![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/jcc9nte4owA/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 04 06 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
In
the
80s
apologizing
for
the
mr.
popular
my
dad
was
mayor
of
machole
when
I
was
a
kid
in
on
City
Council
and
you
guys
need
the
prayer,
so
the
Lord
be
with
you:
gracious
Heavenly
Father,
you
sanctify
us
with
your
Commandments
and
you
plant,
eternal
life
in
our
midst
in
this
Easter
season,
we're
grateful
Lord
for
the
gift
of
forgiveness
and
eternal
life.
Your
son
Jesus
says
no
authority
is
given
unless
from
above.
We
thank
you
for
these
leaders
that
you
yourself
have
raised
up.
We
pray
that
you
might
guide
them.
B
A
D
E
F
A
It's
nice
to
have
everybody
back:
Don,
yeah,
yeah,
all
tanned
up
got
rid
of
the
beard;
everything
all
ready,
good
deal.
Okay,
this
time
we're
gonna,
get
started
up.
Number
one
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
I
will
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
section
by
Bruce
second,
by
Don,
any
questions
on
the
consent
agenda.
Hearing
none
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
G
A
Motion
carried
number
two
will
approval
of
the
agenda.
I
will
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Beth.
Second,
by
Randy
any
questions
on
the
agenda
hearing
none
I
will
look
for
Council
action,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
three
ordinance
number
1509
amending
section,
12.1
0:01,
regulating
security
guards
within
and
for
the
city
of
Watertown.
This
is
a
second
reading.
A
G
A
Know
if
you
can
just
run
quickly
through
this
ordinance
again
for
us
I
know
we
had
first
reading,
but
I
would
like
second
reading
to
have
a
little
discussion
about
the
500
bucks.
Though-
and
you
know
we
go-
that's
still
gonna
be
on
the
ordinance
$500.
Are
we
supposed
to
keep
it
at
500
or
is
the
suggestion
to
take
it
down
a
little
bit
for
other
folks?
Besides
police
officers,.
H
I
H
H
H
J
G
A
E
While
you're
doing
that,
because
here's
what
I
you
know
I
go
out
to
race
events,
I
go
to
the
concerts,
they
had
out
there
and
they
got.
You
know
people
that
are
out
there
that
either
of
volunteered
or
have
been
paid-
and
it
says
security
on
them
right,
I,
don't
know
if
that's
a
secured
yard.
If
it's
not
a
security
guard,
you
know
go
to
school
events
and
and
oftentimes
there's.
There
may
be
some
non
school
employees
that
are
serving
as
security,
but
there's
some
of
their
things.
D
I
H
The
ordinance
says
that
no
person
partnership
corporation
shall,
from
and
after
the
effective
dates
to
sort
of
be
permitted
to
engage
in
occupation
of
security
guard.
So
to
me,
that's
an
occupation,
that's
a
job!
I
would
call
them,
maybe
more
so,
but
security
can
be
anything
you
want
it
to
be
an
event
staff.
I
guess
you
could
say
that
that
there's
securing
this
event
like
basketball
games,
that
you're
talking
about
Micah
school
event
or
it.
I
H
Me
I
would
think
you'd
have
to
have
some
sort
of
uniform,
whether
it
be
a
badge.
Insignia
security
guard,
I,
don't
think
a
t-shirt
saying
security
guard
really
would
fit
the
bill.
If
it's
a
uniform,
you
know
professional,
uniform,
Duty
belts.
Those
types
of
things,
in
my
opinion
would
be
security
guard.
My.
K
H
F
Think
Mike's
right,
there's,
no
there's
no
guide
as
to
what
how
do
I
recognize
you
as
being
different
security
than
somebody
that
has
a
t-shirt
on
it
says:
security
garden
is
just
unpaid,
help
and
and
I.
Think
you
made
some
comment
last
time
to
the
fact
that
when
it
says
security
guard
on
there
or
even
says
security,
I,
don't
know
what.
G
F
E
That
I
think
we
need
to
do
something
with
that,
and
the
second
thing
is
here
in
it,
maybe
just
to
play
with
words
but
somewhere
on
there.
It
says
that
soreness
shall
not
apply
to
any
South
Dakota
certified
officer
or
to
any
employee
who
draw
a
salary
directly
from
one
employer
to
me:
a
salary
as
a
set
wage,
not
an
hourly
wage.
So
are
we
talking
about
compensation
and
really
not
a
salary
or
okay?
E
A
So
then
I
have
a
amended
motion
by
Mike
second
by
Randy.
Any
other
discussion
on
that
hearing.
None
outlook
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
so
Stanton
you'll
you'll
work
on
that
and
then,
of
course
you
will
get
something
that
security
guard.
Okay
right
number:
four
thanks:
Lee
number
for
first
reading
ordinance
number
15
ten
Sara
will
you'll
be
able
to
slide
that
up
there,
quick
for
us
I'm
any
zoning
district
boundaries
by
zoning
property
to
see
three
highly
commercial
district.
We
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
prior.
A
You
can
see
that
what
she's
just
showing
there
is
what
we're
going
to
be
turning
into
c3,
that's
at
Doug's,
ANCA,
marine
next
to
highway,
Tony,
okay,
we're
gonna
move
on
number
five:
first
reading
ordinance:
number
15,
11
amending
zoning
district
boundaries,
a
zoning
property
east
of
25th,
Street
East
to
r1
single-family
residential
district,
and
if
you
show
this,
this
is
actually
folks.
This
is
the
Eastwood's
18
division,
I
believe
it
is
joined,
Nelson
and
Peggy.
Haugen
is
bringing
that
it's
in
the
blue
right
where
she's,
showing
they
are
bringing
this
into
the
city.
L
A
C
Can
basically
this?
This
is
an
administrative
change.
Only
the
only
section
that
was
changed
was
section
2a
and
the
reason
that
it
changed
is
that
through
our
srf,
which
is
state
revolving
fund,
we
have
loans
through
the
state,
low-interest
loans
and
one
of
their
rate,
covenants
or
loan
covenants
is
that
we
have
to
keep
a
hundred
and
ten
percent
coverage.
So
the
total
2150
is
not
changing.
The
total
892
or
$0.99
or
whatever
that's
getting
put
towards
the
surcharge
is
not
changing.
What
is
changing
is
the
individual
amount.
C
That's
going
to
s
are
a
5
s,
RF
7,
+
s,
RF
9,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
s
RF
5
no
longer
carries
at
110
percent
coverage
and
the
s
RF
7
is
getting
close
to
that
hundred
and
10
percent
coverage.
So
we
have
more
in
some
in
less
than
others,
so
we're
just
changing
that
around
to
remain
in
compliance
with
the
state,
and
we
told
them
that
we
were
going
to
do
this
to
remain
with
our
debt
covenants
and
and
so
really
it's
just
basically
an
administrative
change.
C
C
But
that's
that's
just
kind
of
what
I
can
see
is
the
revenue
will
change
a
little
bit
every
year
and
the
debt
payments
will
change
a
little
bit
every
year.
We'll
change
that
percentage,
and
it's
such
a
small
number
of
what
you
know
the
dollar
figure.
It
doesn't
take
much
to
change
that
from
107
to
113
percent
five
cents,
we'll
change
it
from
107
percent
113
percent
coverage,
so
I
mean
that's
just
how
close
it.
M
A
G
A
Those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
7
planted
the
turbot
second,
addition
to
the
municipality
of
Watertown,
cotton,
County,
South,
Dakota
resolution
number,
1511
and
Sara.
If
you
will
take
this
force,
this
was
in
front
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
it
comes
before
you
with
their
approval.
So
if
you
want
to
touch
base
on
them,
sure.
L
This
is
a
condominium,
plat
that's
been
proposed
and
we
don't
address
it
very
explicitly
within
our
ordinance.
So,
just
looking
at
our
ordinances
for
subdivision,
which
is
proposed,
he
wants
to
break
the
lot
into
nine
units.
Our
definition
of
lot
is
a
unit
of
a
recorded
plat,
and
we
can't
I
cannot
administrative
ly
approve
anything
with
more
than
five
Lots
that
there
are
also
has
been
no
preliminary
plan
done
for
the
area
and
we
don't
have
anything
against
the
way
this
is
being
done.
We
just
don't
address
it
explicitly.
L
A
E
B
E
E
A
pretty
sad
day
when
something
when
a
plan
is
brought
in
before
our
plan
Commission
and
with
a
promise
made
to
do
something,
an
explicit
promise
on
new
construction
and
the
person
or
persons
or
entity
distinctly
chooses
not
to
do
it
and
now
we're
sitting
here
with
this
thing,
that's
that
now
is
on
our
books.
It'll
be
in
our
system
out
of
compliance,
I
think
that's
a
very,
very
poor
representation
and
I
know
it's
not
the
current
owners
fault,
but
I
think
that's
ridiculous
and
I.
E
A
Because
one
of
the
things
that
you,
if
you
look
at
Mike,
if
you
would
look
at
Sarah's
notes
on
this
page
here,
there
was
no
preliminary
plan
approved
at
this
time.
Property
I
was
only
one
connection,
there's
a
number
of
things
that
never
it
really
didn't
go
through
so
I
mean
we
have
as
a
as
a
body
here
to
make
those
decisions.
A
E
Sad
thing
about
is:
is
now
you've
got
a
current
owner
that
wasn't
a
party
to
this
whole
thing.
That
is
correct
and
that's
the
thing
that's
really
unfortunate
victory.
I
will
tell
you
in
when
we
have
worked
with
those
other
businesses
there
and
they
put
a
lot
of
money
into
their
areas.
We
have
required
them
to
do
this
and
now
we're
just
going
to
say
and
and
again
I'm
not
faulting
the
current
owner
I'm,
assuming
that
sailors
went
through
or
whatever
I'm.
A
E
E
J
I
guess
in
that
there
may
be
some
contingency
in
the
purchase
agreement
between
the
new
owner
and
the
and
the
person
who
sold
it
was.
It
was
clear.
The
city
required
that
that
that
infrastructure,
the
boulevard,
be
part
of
as
part
of
the
approval.
Originally
there
may
be
some
recourse
to
the
current
owner
to
go
back
to
the
person
they
bought
it
from
for
having
failed
to
comply,
but
the
city
I
take
Mike's
point:
I,
guess
we
could
you,
you
could
probably
require
the
current
owner
the
new
owner
to
do
something
but
boy.
E
I
and
that's
I,
don't
like
that
idea
doing
that,
but
it's
just
something
Sarah
that
if
we,
if
we
didn't,
approve
this
tonight
and
had
time
to
meet
with
the
current
ownership
and
with
Stanton
and
to
see,
maybe
they'd
share
the
purchase
agreement
with
us,
and
maybe
we
could
see
what
our
recourse
potentially
could
be
and
then
bring
it
back.
I
mean.
Is
you
know
if
this
is
of
urgent
nature,
that
it
couldn't
wait
two
weeks
or
tell
the
next
council
I.
J
Would
like
to
think
that
the
purchase
agreement
included
as
a
contingency,
your
approval,
this
plateau
I,
don't
know,
but
that
would
be
prudent,
is
that
this
is
what
we
want
to
do.
This
is
our
intention
so
absent
the
council
granting
approval
this
condominium
plat
we're
not
going
to
close
on
the
sale.
I,
don't
know
if
it's
closed,
yeah.
E
And
I,
don't
you
again?
I,
don't
want
to
make
a
mountain
out
of
a
molehill,
but
this
is
a
complete
slap
in
the
face
to
all
the
people.
All
the
time
we
spend
working
on
our
ordinances,
all
the
people
that
comply
to
our
ordinances
and
then
for
something
just
to
be
not
done,
I,
think
it's
a
slap
in
the
face
and
to
all
those
people
that
that
are
trying
to
do
the
right
thing.
Yeah
and.
A
E
All
right,
let
me
ask
question:
are
we
better
off
approving
this
and
putting
a
stipulation
for
compliance
in
and
then
dealing
with
Scott
in
whomever?
Where
are
we
better
off
withdrawing
it
or
tabling
it
or
whatever,
and
then
working
with
Scott
to
figure
out
things
and
if
we
need
that
bring
it
back,
which
is
the
most
proper
way,
I
think.
J
Probably
the
the
best
course
would
be
to
have
a
vote
on
the
motion.
That's
on
the
floor
to
approve
or
not
approve
the
plat.
You've
got
a
motion,
a
second
to
approve
the
plat.
You
guys
could
recommend
not
approving
it
and
recommend
it
go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
have
them
review
the
plat
and
impose
some
additional
conditions.
If
that's
what
you
think
is
appropriate,
send
it
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
there
I
assume
they're
the
ones
that
recommended
it
forward
to
you.
J
A
D
N
J
N
L
L
N
L
N
That
exemption,
I
think
I've.
You
know
I've
heard
of
these
before
I
think
that
this
is
something
that
is
relatively
new.
I
think
this
is
something
that's
happening
in
other
communities,
this
type
of
thing,
but
but
again
with
our
current
ordinances,
I
think
our
Kirk.
We
may
need
his
separate
ordinances
to
cover
this
type
of
a
planning.
I,
don't
know
that
our
existing
ordinance
would
even
allow
this.
G
N
L
Been
constructed
that
way,
but
not
necessarily
plaited
that
way
and
and
all
over
town
we
have
places
that
have
been
sold
unit
by
unit
on
eight.
You
know
one
lot
and
you're
getting
you
know
a
piece
of
that
lap,
but
it's
not
recorded
as
a
Platt
and
that's
something
we
don't
require.
The
applicant
is
coming
to
us
saying:
I
want
to
record
a
Platt,
and
this
is
how
I
want
it
to
look
and
I
want
each
unit
to
have
its
lines
drawn
and
I'm
gonna
sell
those
off.
J
A
G
A
A
A
Very
good:
we
will
move
on
to
number
eight
a
resolution
providing
for
the
repeal
of
certain
capital
expenditures
appropriations
and
allowing
for
the
carryover
other
catholics
bender
appropriation
from
2014
budget
resolution
number
1507,
and
this
is
you
Shelley
and
Sarah?
Can
you
bring
up
the
one
that
I
was
asking
about?
Thank.
C
C
There's
a
couple
changes
I
put
that
on
everybody's
in
front
of
everybody
and
gave
one
to
the
press
from
what
was
submitted
in
the
agenda
packet
and
I'll.
Just
tell
you
what
those
couple
changes
are
under
the
park:
recreation
of
Forestry
fund,
the
first
line
item
improvements
to
building
four
seven
thousand
one
hundred
fifty
dollars
has
been
removed
that
does
not
need
to
be
carried
over.
There
is
no
project
there.
C
The
the
request
was
that
they
didn't
think
that
a
hundred
thousand
is
going
to
cover
all
of
the
right
away
acquisition,
that's
needed
for
that
project
and
that's
what
the
city
has
to
pay
for,
and
the
state
will
pay
for
the
rest
of
that
rail
closure
and
and
getting
a
another
Road
in
there
added
back
I
to
see
what
I
called
it
Uptown
redevelopment
project
has
been
added
for
ninety
six
thousand.
That
was
for
an
alley
that
was
budgeted
for
uptown.
C
That
wasn't
done,
and
the
request
from
the
mayor
was
that
it's
staying
in
and
get
carried
forward
in
just
in
case
there's
some
other
alleys
around
town
that
need
to
be
worked
on
or
if
there's
any
issues
so
that's
been
added
in
and
then
I
did
under
zoom
improvements
decrease
that
carryover
amount
from
what
what
you
saw
went
through
this
afternoon
through
all
the
expenditures
and
and
found
which
projects
were
still
hadn't
been
started
or
were
in
the
process.
I
needed
to
be
carried
over
and
some
projects
were
done
and
came
in
under
budget.
C
So
not
all
of
that
was
required,
and
so
those
are
the
changes.
So
now,
if
you
look,
I
also
handed
out
a
sheet
that
says,
carry
over
explanations
and
it
it
mirrors,
basically
that
whole
entire
list,
starting
with
the
general
fund
and
the
line
items
that
are
being
requested,
and
why
the
request
is
there,
it's
either
equipment
that
hasn't
been
purchased
yet
and
then
under
the
second
penny,
there
are
projects
that
haven't
been
completed,
haven't
been
started
under
the
zoo
improvements.
There's
a
few
projects,
because
this
has
been
kind
of
a
three-year.
C
G
G
C
C
The
reason
that
they're
requesting
all
of
it,
there's
about
two
hundred
and
thirty,
eight
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
remaining
in
that
about
eight
thousand
of
that
has
been
spent
in
2015
they're,
going
to
have
about
another
thirty
thousand,
yet
they
figure
in
2013
when
they
budgeted
for
the
service
building.
They
were
directed
by
the
previous
mayor
and
some
of
the
council
members
that
they
would
be
allowed
to
use
the
remainder
of
the
children's
zoo
money
if
there
was
any
left
and
only
to
put
in
what
extra
they
needed
for
that
service
building.
C
That's
where
the
six
hundred
thousand
has
come
in
and
it
hasn't
been
addressed
previously
because
they
haven't
been
done
with
the
project
and
they
had
no
idea
whether
they
were
going
to
have
extra
funds
or
not.
So
now
we're
kind
of
to
the
end
of
that
project,
and
so
now
would
be
the
time
to
give
that
direction.
But
I
left
the
whole
entire
amount
in,
because
that
was
kind
of
the
the.
A
Direction
that
you
know
that
the
Park
and
Rec
was
given,
whose
I've
had
this
discussion
with
the
with
the
zoo,
folks
and
and
and
J
that
it
was
left
in,
but
at
this
particular
time,
I
I,
don't
feel
that
it's
justified
to
spend
six
hundred
thousand
on
a
building.
So
if
I
was
a
council,
I
would
sit
back
even
though
there
may
have
been
direction
by
another
body.
I
think
this
body
needs
to
take
that
direction
and
and
really
look
at
it
again.
E
C
E
A
M
A
C
Probably
okay!
Well,
in
that,
that's
up
to
you
guys,
if
you
don't
wish
to
carry
over
the
six
hundred
thousand
or
the
two
hundred
thousand.
We
can
decrease
that
by
the
eight
hundred
and
that
that's
completely
up
to
you
guys,
but
that's
what
the
request
is
here
from
the
parking
rack
so
and
then,
if
you
guys
have
any
other
questions
that
if
you've
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
carry
over
explanations,
it's
kind
of
you
know
standard
stuff.
There
is
Nathan.
C
The
other
thing
would
be
the
golf
course
projects
for
the
two
hundred
ninety
four
five
sixty
they
had
requested
that
that
entire
amount
they
don't
need.
They
need
about
fifteen
to
seventeen
thousand
dollars
to
finish
the
intake
project,
and
they
wanted
to
use
the
remainder
of
that
to
complete
additional
greens
and
add
that
to
the
two
hundred
and
some
thousand
they
have
for
2015.
So
that
would
be
another
reallocation
of
funds.
C
The
other
one
would
be
under
the
airport,
the
de-icing
truck
and
the
improvements
other
than
building
they
that
those
would
be
carried
over
to
be
used
for
the
hangar
construction
that
you
authorized
to
go
up
for
bids.
There
is
no
budget
currently
in
2015
for
that,
but
this
could
be
carried
over
and
reallocated
for
that
purpose.
If
you
authorized
once
those
bids
come
in,
so
those
would
be
the
only
ones
that
that
would
be
out
of
the
ordinary
I
do.
A
A
A
Two
of
them
there
that
that
truly
need
to
get
finished
and
and
we've
kind
of
dinked
and
did
a
little
bit
here
and
a
little
bit
there.
We
got
to
get
them
done
and
the
plan
guys
is
to
get
into
these
greens
at
the
end
of
the
the
golf
league,
whether
it's
men's
league
women's
league
whatever
and
start
on
these
greens
and
get
them
finished
up,
come
August
in
September,
so
that
they're
done
right
there.
A
D
E
And
I
got
another
question:
is
this
one
bite
at
the
Apple
thing,
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
voted
on
whatever
here
and
we
find
out
mid
season
here
mid
year,
that
you
know
we
don't
want
to
do
a
given
project
on
here
and
we'd
rather
have
those
dollars
be
used
elsewhere?
Do
we
have
the
opportunity
then,
to
do
that,
or
is
this
one
time
of
year
type
deal
this.
J
C
A
A
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
all
know
that
Sarah
and
I-
and
we
had
we
had
engineers
here-
we
also
had
I
believe-
was
a
Susan
and
a
Jeff
Susan
from
Sioux
Falls
and
Jeff
from
Aberdeen
with
the
Department
of
Transportation.
We
also
had
Ron
here
and
then
there
was
one
other
gentleman
from
the
d-o-t
here
in
Watertown.
A
But
if
you
remember
right,
if
you
go
back
in
2007,
there's
a
railroad
that
the
city
of
Watertown
said
they
would
close
and
that
railroad
is
down
here
on
First
Avenue
over
by
the
old
home
bakery
in
that
area,
the
council
had
decided
on
that
one
to
to
close
the
city
kept
budgeting.
Four
hundred
thousand
for
this
prod
project
was
kind
of
weird
how
it
was
because
the
engineering
department
always
said
well
we're
budgeting
four
hundred
thousand,
but
yet
then
we
find
out
that
it
was
also
four
hundred
thousand.
A
They
expected
in
revenues
to
come
in
to
pay
the
foreigner
thousand
for
the
project.
Shelley
has
put
some
dollars
away
for
this
project.
So
what
we're
going
to
do
just
so,
you
understand
we
are
going
to
go
ahead
and
close
that
that
railroad
crossing
that
road
will
be
sending
out
for
RFPs
requests
for
proposals
for
consulting
engineer,
Sarah's
already
started
that
project
what
it.
A
What
will
happen
is
they
will
have
to
be
a
state,
approved
engineering
firm
and
once
we
get
those
our
P's
back,
we'll
discuss
that
and
kind
of
take
a
look
and
see
which
one
is
best
and
also
the
state
is
working
with
us
on
that.
So
here's
kind
of
the
way
it's
going
to
run
you're
gonna
see
a
plan
layout
so
that
April
the
RFPs
go
out.
May
the
consulting
firm
has
chosen
the
summer
2015
this
summer.
There
will
be
surveying
that
gets
done
and
it
will
start
in
the
year.
A
2016
and
and
I
wrote
on
here.
The
funding
part
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
This
is
a
federal
project.
This
is
not
a
state
project
or
a
city
project.
It's
a
federal
closure
project,
project
and
construction
on
this
project.
When
it
was
originally
thought
that
we
would
have
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
rightaway
expenditures
that
we
would
see
and
the
cost
of
the
projects
was
around
three
hundred
thousand
susan
seemed
to
think
that
the
construction
is
going
to
cost
about
five
hundred
thousand
now
at
this
time.
A
A
A
A
L
A
F
F
A
Exactly
correct
so
here
before
we
go
to
that
bill,
here's
the
current
way
that
that
is
going
to
look.
If
you
look
right,
where
the
baseball
bat
is
to
the
right
of
that
is
the
the
fire
department.
So
the
fire
department
can
come
out
of
there
and
go
right
straight
down
first
down
and
take
a
little
corner
and
come
right
on
to
kempt
Avenue
Kemp
Avenue
on
the
bottom.
A
There
is
right
away
that
we're
going
to
have
to
have
to
get
a
hold
of
we'll
have
to
look
at
that,
because
Kemp
will
curl
up
to
first
Avenue,
then
first
Avenue,
as
it
comes
across
on
the
very
top
again
goes
through,
and
then
there's
a
turnaround
out
there
by
where
gosh
the
old
home
bakery
is
and
the
same
thing
on
the
west
side
of
that.
That
is
the
way
that
it
will
look
in
the
future.
A
C
F
F
G
C
K
A
K
N
A
K
N
N
N
O
O
Ali
have
a
question
when
that
money,
if
the
zoo
needs,
do
they
need
this
building,
if
that
money
goes
away
that
we
say
you
know,
let's
not
have
that
in
there
anymore
and
I'm,
not
saying
it
should
be.
Six
hundred
thousand
I
I
don't
have
any
idea
what
a
but,
but
if
they
come
in
and
say
they
really
do
need
this
building,
and
if
we've
taken
that
money
out
which
we've
been
talking
about,
how
did
it?
How
do
they
get
it
back
in.
G
C
Have
to
go
back
through
the
budget
process,
they
they
put
it
in
as
a
need
right
now
they
share
space
with
the
park
shop
to
do
some
of
their
repairs
and
maintenance.
They
don't
have
a
building.
They
also
have
three
other
older
buildings
and
an
ice
storage
building
and
a
couple
others
that
are
are
falling
down.
They
need
some
repair
work
to
them
and
and
then,
with
the
the
new
part
of
the
zoo,
with
otter
exhibit
and
the
Children's
Zoo
the
flow
you
know
isn't
as
good
as
it
probably
could
be.
C
C
C
So
if
you
as
a
council,
do
not
want
to
see
this
project
continue,
it
would
be
a
good
thing
to
tell
them
now,
because
they
are,
they
are
spending
the
architect
fees,
getting
something
put
together
and
try
to
keep
it
within
that
budget
and
and
to
try
to
go
up
for
bids
at
probably
December
of
this
year.
So
I
thought.
A
P
C
A
E
A
Q
I
need
I'm
confused
now,
even
if
we
okay,
so
if
we
take
it
out,
it's
gone
right.
We
can't
carry
it
over.
We
can't
do
anything,
but
if
we
leave
it
in
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
used
for
the
zoo
it
can
be
used
for
we
can
come
back
and
say
now.
Let's
take
that
six
hundred
thousand
that
we
carried
over
now
and
put
it
towards
XYZ
right
is
that
correct
or
I
might
get
to
have
that
wrong.
You.
C
Can,
or
can
just
not
be
used
at
all,
you
know
just
because
something
is
there
doesn't
mean
that
it
has
to
be
spent.
It's
just
it's
just
you're
marked
for
that
project,
and
until
the
project
is
done
or
it's
deemed
that
it's
not
going
to
ever
be
done
and
as
far
I'm,
not
Spencer
about
the
walkways,
but
only
eight
hundred
thousand
of
this
would
be
towards
that
service.
C
Building
the
rest
of
it
is
for
the
walkways
that
have
been
budgeted
and
the
rest
of
the
children's
zoo
expenditures,
so
part
of
this
would
would
need
to
to
stay
in
to
finish
those
projects
that
have
been
already
budgeted.
It's
just
the
eight
hundred
thousand
that's
in
question
that
they
want
to
be
set
aside
for
the
service.
D
E
Here's
what
I'm
thinking
we
need
I'm
gonna
use
a
term
that
we
need
to
come
to
Jesus
meeting
in
regards
to,
what's
all
done
at
the
zoo
we
really
do
and
and
I'm
not
close
enough
to
it,
but
you
know
maybe
what
we
do
need
to
do
in
in
hindsight.
E
Maybe
we
just
leave
it
for
now.
Knowing
the
end
point
in
time,
we
can
reallocate
those
dollars,
but
we
need
to
know
I,
don't
think
you
know
best.
I
think
you've
got
some
concerns
and
I
think
and
probably
we
so
we
probably
don't
know
enough
to
to
really
go
out
and
say:
I
have
pull
it.
You
know
it
might
be
a
knee-jerk
reaction,
I.
A
C
A
Q
E
Q
Right
I
would
we
necessarily
take
that
money
out
just
because
of
the
zoo,
if
we
think
we
might
be
able
to
reallocate
that
somewhere
else?
That's
what
that's
the
thing
I'm
trying
to
get
clarification
of,
of
leave
it
in
and
then
deal
with
the
zoo
when
they
come
back
that
that
was
just
what
I'm
trying
to
get
clarification
on.
Cuz
I
have
some
concerns
too,
but
I
also
am
Not.
Sure
I
want
to
just
say
hello.
It's.
I
E
Got
put
in
there
several
years
ago
under
and
it's
just
kind
of
been
in
there.
I'll
be
honest.
There
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
buy-in
from
the
council
that
that's
my
interpretation.
There
hasn't
been
it
because
I'm
not
sure
we
really
understand
it
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
believe
in
the
need,
quite
frankly,
and
because
of
that,
it's
always
kind
of
been
out.
It's
just
been
sitting
out
there.
So
with
that,
it's
kind
of
out
of
sight
out
of
mind.
C
A
A
C
L
E
E
A
A
Hearing
none
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
aye,
opposed
motion
carried
I.
Think
that's
a
good
call
by
you,
guys:
okay,
number,
nine
authorization
for
the
purchase
of
a
Kubota
utility
vehicle
and
trailer
with
urban
renewal
funds
for
uptown
watering.
I
will
look
for
a
motion
and
a
second
on
this
for
discussion
pushing
by
Don
second
by
Bruce
Brandi.
You
want
to
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
this
yeah.
D
Last
year
we
were
able
to
actually
basically
borrow
a
couple
pieces
of
equipment
for
the
watering
project
for
the
urban
renewal
downtown
district.
This
year
we
felt
that,
being
we
were
going
to
turn
that
over
to
the
Park
and
Rec
Department,
that
we,
of
course
there
was
unbudgeted
item
for
the
park
and
Rec
Department.
Q
F
Q
D
Q
G
Q
H
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
thanks,
Randy
I
believe
we
have
a
motion
a
second
on
the
floor.
I
am
looking
for
counsel
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
10
consideration
of
the
alone
extension
request
from
Kerr
Mar
LLC.
If
you
folks
remember
this
is
the
verifications
building.
They
owe
us
seven
hundred
thirty,
two
thousand
one
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
and
ninety
cents.
That
was
due
on
March,
the
24th
of
2015.
A
What
happened
is
that
they
are
going
out
for
a
loan
and
that
loan
is
by
Bank
West
I
believe
is
who's
doing
that
for
them
they're
asking
and
the
state
allowed
it
also
because
they
do
have
some
debt
within
the
state
of
South
Dakota,
the
goe
D
and
in
the
same
amount
the
state
did
allow
them
to
get
an
extension
on
it
in
for
two
months.
Is
that
correct
Shelly
for
two
months?
A
So
what
they're
asking
us
if
they
would
give
them
a
two-month
extension
on
this
loan
they'll
still
pay
the
interest
they'll
still
make
the
payment
fact.
They
made
a
payment
we're
sitting
on
it
waiting
for
you
guys
approval
to
to
allow
the
two-month
extension
to
May
of
2015.
So
I
will
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
dessert.
J
F
A
A
C
This
this
is
something
that
came
in
to
our
office.
I'm
sure
you've
all
had
a
chance
to
read
it
I'm,
not
necessarily
going
to
speak
to
the
statement
that
a
previous
employee
told
them
not
to
call
I
I,
can't
say
they
did
or
did
not.
What
I
can
tell
you
is
that
the
current
staff
that
we
have
they
do
tell
everyone
that
they
have
to
call
in
every
fall,
because
we
have
no
idea
when
they're
leaving
and
we
prefer
that
they
call
every
month.
For
that
credit
versus
waiting
the
the
policy
stated.
C
We
would
go
back
six
months
and
some
would
wait
until
you
know
the
spring
and
then
make
us
go
back
to
six
months.
It's
so
much
easier
to
do
month
by
month,
and
this
gentleman
called
in
the
afternoon
of
Monday
March,
2nd
and
heard
that
the
policy
was
going
to
be
changed
and
wanted
the
credits,
and
then
we
did
not
have
the
information
back
from
the
utilities
and
so
on.
C
The
third
I
instructed
that
may
2nd
was
our
cutoff
day
for
no
more
additional
utility
credits,
and
so
anything
that
was
that
had
been
that
she
was
working
on
had
from
the
utilities
and
was
working
on.
The
credits
up
to
March
2nd
was
to
continue
to
be
done.
Anything
after
that
was
not,
and
this
one
just
fell
into
that
gray
area
was
asked
on
the
second
hadn't
been
processed,
wanted
to
go
back
to
the
six
months.
C
I'm,
the
rest
I
think
is
just
kind
of
dialogue,
which
is
a
moot
point,
because
the
the
policy
has
been
changed,
but
the
the
request
was
for
the
council
to
consider
allowing
us
to
go
back
the
six
months
to
see
if
they
would
be
eligible
for
for
any
of
those
credits.
So
that's
what's
before
you,
okay,.
E
A
E
Well,
I
think
my
own
opinion
is
we're
talking
$200
and
the
tip-off
is
in
20
minutes,
but
no
but-
and
it
seems
how
he
did
call
prior
to
ours-
that
night,
just
I
think
we
ought
to
get
it
done.
If
we
can,
we
can
argue
about
whether
he
did
or
didn't
call.
It
has
been
done
for
my
understanding
on
that
property
in
previous
years.
A
I
can
I
can
tell
you
that
I
had
a
call
from
and
I
think
bill.
You
talked
to
the
gentleman
to
that
was
in
Watertown
and
moved
to
Milbank,
and
he
claims
that
he
had
called
also
that
day
before
hour,
before
our
meeting
for
a
couple
of
months
back-pay
on
his
that
he
had
shut
off
I
forget
the
guys
name
bill.
A
F
E
C
E
A
O
A
A
S
We've,
looked
at
several
different
equipment
options
and
so
forth
over
the
last
30
days,
and
we
at
the
Watertown
Police
Department
feel
that
we
would
be
able
to
accommodate
that
request.
If
you
guys
give
us
the
authority
to
go
ahead
and
provide
contractual
9:1
services
with
them.
This
agreement
be
similar.
S
S
For
that
question,
okay,
okay,
thank
you
asked
me
that
question
last
time
to
equipment
wise,
yes,
dual
County
has
agreed
to
upgrade
our
recorder
system.
That
was
the
piece
of
equipment.
I
mentioned
last
time
that
we
would
have
to
upgrade
staffing
I.
Think
you
also
asked
that
question.
Would
we
have
to
increase
our
staffing
levels?
It
would
be
my
intent
to
ask
for
your
permission
to
add
to
part-time
positions
during
the
peak
hours
of
the
day,
maybe
between
hours
of
noon
and
6:00
p.m.
S
Yes,
historically,
if
you
look
at
the
911
budget
and
the
amount
that
the
city
has
contributed
to
that
budget,
going
back
to
about
2000
moving
today's
date,
almost
on
an
annual
basis
that
amount
has
increased
and
back
in
about
2013,
we
met
chief
and
I
and
we're
able
to
see
that
at
some
point
in
time,
we
needed
to
make
some
changes
to
close
that
gap
to
reduce
the
amount
of
contributions
that
the
city
has
to
put
towards
it.
We're
not
quite
to
that
point
yet
where
we
can
reduce
the
city's
contribution
and
I.
S
Don't
know
that
we
will
get
to
that
point,
because
there's
rising
costs
associated
with
911
employee
cost
it
all
it
all
adds
up.
But
what
we
do
know
is
is
that
by
bringing
on
Clark
County,
that
was
an
additional
thirty
eight
thousand
dollars
a
year
of
revenue
by
bringing
on
dual
County.
We
know
that
that
would
be
approximately
forty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year
of
additional
revenue.
S
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
we're
trying
to
close
that
gap
that
we
know
exists,
but
the
fact
is,
is
water.
Toners
is
now
and
probably
will
continue
to
have
a
fairly
large
contribution
towards
911
services,
as
well
as
dispatch
staff
to
take
care
of
the
water
tone
needs
the
daily
needs
of
our
officers
as
they're
out
there
performing
traffic
stops.
The
daily
needs
to
meet
our
local
customers
are
public
here
in
Watertown.
The
business
line
calls
you
know
just
general
questions
for
police
officers.
We
still
need
those
staff
to
operate
our
business.
It's.
N
N
S
Think
with
the
employees
that
we've
been
able
to
attract
in
a
911,
Center
they're,
very
dedicated
people,
they're
professional
people,
they're
people
that
are
motivated
to
do
that
job.
To
help
people
to
multitask
to
to
do
all
the
work,
that's
required
of
a
communications
officer.
It's
not
an
easy
job.
There's
not
a
lot
of
people
that
want
to
do
that
type
of
work,
because
you're
dealing
with
life
and
death
situations
in
some
case,
but
the
people
that
we've
attracted
to
the
911
Center
typically
have
stayed
with
us.
S
Are
annual
funds
last
year
we
would
have
received
roughly
$80,000
of
incentive
funding
for
the
counties
that
we
serve
this
year,
there'll
be
an
additional
5,000
roughly
for
Clark
County,
because
we
just
brought
on
Clark
County
this
year.
January
1st
of
this
year,
so
they'd
be
approximately
$5,000
there
and
then
the
same
with
dual
County
it'll
be
a
little
less
than
5,000,
because
we're
not
looking
at
having
a
start
date
until
probably
around
July
1st.
S
It
takes
a
lot
of
behind-the-scenes
work
to
work
with
the
telephone
companies
to
work
with
radio
equipment
and
a
lot
of
other
things
that
need
to
be
taken
care
of
behind
the
scenes.
Already,
we've
started
looking
at
the
radio
equipment
side,
what
it
would
take
for
equipment
to
go
from
Watertown
over
to
Clear
Lake
Dule
County
area,
and
we
already
have
some
estimates
of
what
that'll
cost
and
again
the
dual.
G
S
Commissioners
have
voted
to
take
care
of
those
cost
up
to
a
certain
dollar
amount,
so
they
have
they've
been
stepping
up
to
the
plate
to
at
least
accommodate
us
with
those
funds
to
expand
our
nice
recorder
and
take
care
of
the
radio
communications
which
is
part
of
the
contract.
They're
required
to
do
so.
S
E
S
E
S
Going
across
South
Dakota
right
now,
actually
it's
national
trend
that
larger
piece,
apse,
public
safety,
answering
points
or
dispatch
centers
are
absorbing
smaller
centers,
because
smaller
centers
just
can't
stay
in
business
with
the
cost,
the
equipment
and
the
cost
of
employees.
For
example,
if
you
know
do
a
con,
you
wanted
to
stay
in
business,
they'd
be
looking
at
probably
five
six
employees.
S
You
know
take
that
times.
Forty
thousand
dollars
employee.
They
only
receive
$50,000
in
surcharges.
So
it's
not
it's
hard
for
them
to
stay
in
business,
so
the
advantage
to
us
is
working
with
our
friends
and
our
neighbors
neighboring
counties
to
bring
those
folks
on
board
so
that
at
some
point
as
we
move
forward,
we
can
maybe
share
in
some
of
the
capital
expenditure
issues
that
we
have,
or
maybe
we
can
share
in
some
other
maintenance
expenses
right
now.
Our
contract
doesn't
call
for
that
right.
Now.
S
F
S
There,
though,
mr.
Danforth
is
that
we
have
911
launch
which
results
in
about
25
percent
of
our
business,
and
then
we
have
all
the
other
activities
that
we
do.
The
business
line
phone
calls
the
taking
traffic
for
officers
all
those
things
that
the
city
Watertown
certainly
has
a
vested
interest
in
and
maintaining
all
those
operations.
So
even
if
we
didn't
do
911,
if
we
simply
just
answered
business
line,
calls
here
and
took
care
of
the
officer,
traffic
we'd
still
need
at
least
two
people
per
shift
to
do
that.
S
N
O
N
E
N
A
couple
of
things:
first
of
all,
how
how
do
we
establish
the
fee
structure
for
these
guys?
That's
one
question
the
other
one
is
and
and
I
don't
I,
don't
doubt
for
a
second
that
you've
got
great
qualified
people
up
there,
but
in
lieu
of
the
fact
we
can't
get
people
say
we're
out
six
months
and
we've
got
a
contractual
agreement
with
those
folks.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
take
care
of
that?
If
we
can't
find
the
people,
we
need
those.
S
Are
my
two
questions?
First
question:
how
did
we
arrive
at
the
contract
that
we
currently
have
as
far
as
collecting
surcharges?
This
has
been
an
agreement.
That's
been
in
place
as
far
back
as
I
can
remember.
One
of
the
first
counties
we
had
come
on
board
was
Hamlin
County
in
2001,
and
then
we
had
Dade
County
in
2005
Grant
County
in
2006,
Clark
County,
and
this
year
now
dual
County.
Every
time
we've
added
those
counties,
we've
had
the
same
contract.
S
That
said,
you
know,
X
amount
percentage
of
your
surcharges,
I
think
when
Hamlin
County
first
came
on
board
with
us,
we
asked
for
50
percent
of
their
surcharges
over
the
years
that
is
growing
same
with
Grant
County
I
can
recall
that
being
75
percent,
but
over
the
years
it
has
increased
to
where
it
is
today,
90
percent.
We
looked
at
some
other
options
when
we
implemented
that
process
and
actually
I've
had
recent
conversations
with
other
directors
across
the
state
and
some
still
charge
per
capita.
S
Some
do
like
we
do,
which
makes
it
really
really
simple,
has
just
given
or
send
90
percent
of
your
search
hours.
It's
an
easy,
easy
financing
method
to
to
figure
that
out
versus
trying
to
figure
out.
Let's
see
did
somebody
move
from
the
county
that
telephone
lines
change
did
all
those
things
change,
it's
it's
so
much
easier
to
just
look
at
a
certain
percentage
of
their
funding.
So
that's
that's.
The
first
part
of
that
second
part
was
employees.
S
What
I
would
say
to
that
Bruce
is.
If
we
don't
have
two
part-timers
on
board
on
July
1,
it's
not
going
to
be
an
extremely
urgent
issue
that
we
have
somebody
then,
and
there
on
that
first
day,
that
we
start
services
as
a
matter
of
fact,
it'll
take
us
a
couple
months
just
to
train
these
people,
probably
three
months,
just
to
just
to
go
through
a
training
process.
S
So
I
would
say
that
with
the
12
full-time
staff
that
we
have
we'll
be
able
to
make
that
work,
if
there's
special
advanced,
where
we
know
there's
going
to
be
additional
people
in
towns
such
as
like
the
Clear
Lake
rodeo,
that
they
have
probably
what
we
would
do
is
look
at
paying
some
overtime
so
that
we
have
extra
staff
in
the
center
on
a
day.
Like
that
same
with
water
tone,
you
know
fourth
of
July.
We
would
have
extra
staff
on
board
that
day.
So
short-term
answer
is,
if.
I
D
A
Would
also
like
to
add
Mike
gun
on
your
comment
that
is
just
water
Tom
paying
for
this.
When
you
go
through
those
parking
lots
I
see
a
lot
of
2330
twos,
18s
they're
paying
you
know,
those
folks
are
shopping,
Watertown
and-
and
there
are
dollars
coming
here
because
of
those
towns,
any
other
questions
for
Scott.
Oh
just.
D
S
S
Well,
if
we
answered
just
for
Canton,
county
and
city
Watertown,
Kyneton
County,
the
surcharge
dollars
coming
back
to
us
from
the
state
are
about
two
hundred
fifty
eight
thousand
dollars
a
year
staff,
wise
I,
say:
we'd
still
need
approximately
eight
people
times
fifty
thousand
be
four
hundred
thousand,
and
then
we're
still
going
to
have
the
maintenance
of
our
equipment,
whether
we
serve
one
County
or
we
serve
several
counties.
We're
still
gonna
have
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year
in
maintenance
cost.
So
this.
S
You're
at
five
hundred
thousand
versus
two
hundred
two
hundred
thousand
and
I
would
add
to
that.
Back
in
2013
I
contacted
several
of
the
larger
cities
in
South
Dakota
Mitchell,
Aberdeen,
Brookings,
Sioux,
Falls,
Rapid,
City
and
I
compared
what
the
city
of
Watertown
was
putting
in
which
at
that
time
was
one
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
a
year
compared
that
with
what
all
the
other
cities
were.
Paying
and
Watertown
came
in
at
the
the
lowest
amount
that
we
were
contributing
towards
our
9,
1
centers,
so
I
think
we're
we're
highly
efficient
in
our
operations.
S
A
And
I
might
add.
I've
listened
to
a
number
of
the
9-1-1
calls
that
they've
sent
to
my
office
and
those
people
are
highly
trained
because
it
takes
quite
a
person
not
to
lose
your
temper
on
some
of
those
folks.
It's
it's
amazing
what
they
go
through
any
other
questions
we
have
for
Scott.
Otherwise,
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carried.
Thank.
A
Number
thirteen
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
Denham
to
the
airport
lease
what
this
is.
This
is
very
simple
guys.
We
have
sold
a
couple
of
parcels
off
of
the
airport
grounds.
The
Fleming
folks
have
a
lease
agreement
with
us
for
currently
774
acres.
Since
we
have
sold
a
few
of
the
acres,
it
is
now
758
acres
and
we'd
like
to
have
this
addendum
to
their
lease.
So
at
this
time,
I
would
look
for
a
motion
as
a
second
for
discussion
where's,
my
brew
second,
by
Dan.
Any
questions
on
that
Stanton
could
answer
them.
A
L
D
I
C
F
C
A
A
Any
other
questions
I
didn't
mean
to
stop
you.
There
Bruce,
okay,
hearing,
no
more
questions.
I
looked
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
number
15
authorization
for
the
mayor,
sign
engineering
contract
with
Austin
engineering
for
15th,
Street
and
18th
Avenue,
Northeast
design
and
Platt
project
in
the
amount
of
twenty
six
thousand
six
hundred
dollars.
Now,
if
I'm
correct
on
this
Sara
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
all
of
18th
Avenue
on
the
city
property
over
to
15th,
Street
and
14th
Avenue
up
to
18th
Street
great.
G
A
Hearing
not
now
we
look
for
a
most
console
action.
All
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
16
authorization
for
the
mayor's
and
engineering
contract
with
Austin
engineering
for
the
community
center
construction
project
in
the
amount
of
sixty
seven
thousand
dollars.
I.
Look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
on
this
portion
by
bill
second
line.
A
One
of
the
interesting
things
on
this
I
had
conversation
today
with
with
our
I
believe
it
was
Tegra.
Tegra
group
we've
got
this.
This
amount
budgeted
within
the
the
whole
you
the
facility
up
there,
the
Watertown
Community
Center
has
this
actually
as
a
line
budget
we
actually
have
$70,000
put
in
on
the
line.
We
would
expect
this
to
really
come
in
at
60,
so
that's
just
a
little
heads-up
on
what
I
understand
on
it.
So
a
few
folks
have
any
questions
on
that.
You
can
bring
them
out
what.
L
A
Ok,
any
other
questions,
something
we
got
to
do
to
get
this
project
moving
along,
so
I
will
look
for
for
council
action
at
this
time.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
17
authorization
for
the
mayor,
sent
agreement
with
the
South
Dakota
department,
transportation
to
fund
a
transportation
planning
study
with
a
20%
city
match.
This
would
be
interesting
when
Sara
gets
on
that,
but
I
will
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
L
This
is
a
grant
to
help
Watertown
establish
a
pavement
management
system,
which
is
a
database
of
our
road
conditions,
so
that
we
can
prioritize
which
roads
to
do
first,
and
we
really
need
this
and
looking
forward
to
to
getting
it
done
and
then
for
the
state
helping
us,
because
they
have
a
lot
of
expertise.
Yeah.
L
A
At
getting
this,
this
is
going
to
be
a
good
deal.
You
guys
know
it
is.
It
does
have
some
dollars,
but
this
will
go
into
2016
budget
year.
It
will
not
be
in
2015
there
than
any
additional
capital
we
got
to
get,
but
I
really
want
to
say
thanks
to
you
guys
you,
because
we've
got
300
plus
miles
of
roads
that
we
need
to.
We
need
to
keep
up
on.
So
thank
you.
If.
G
A
A
Here
came
in,
if
you
take
a
look
at
that,
we
had
one
bid
that
came
back
on
this.
This
is
for
our
our
sidewalk
accessibility.
For
the
handicapped
side,
the
the
engineer's
estimate
was
two
hundred
and
six
thousand
thirty
one
dollars.
There
was
only
one
bid
that
came
in
three
hundred
and
eighty
six
thousand
seven
hundred
ninety
eight
dollars.
I
I
would
say
that
we
should
who
should
not
do
this
at
this
time?
I,
don't
believe
that
we
need
to
do
the
sidewalk
accessibility
this
year,
if
it's
going
to
cost
us
as
much
money.
I
L
D
T
R
A
G
A
A
M
Basically,
looking
for
Council
authorization
develop
for
two
bids
for
three
dump
trucks:
one
of
those
dump
trucks
were
carrying
over
funds
from
last
year,
which
included
when
we
purchased
the
snow
blower.
We
still
had
funds
that
was
allocated
for
a
dump
truck,
so
we
carried
that
over
and
we
do
have
budget
dollars
this
year
for
two
other
dump.
Trucks,
so
probably
get
better
pricing
with
the
three
and
then
a
sander
box,
and
then
I
skid
steer
with
attachments
which
cleaner
snowblower
bucket
and
a
broom
looking
at,
and
it's
all
budgeted.
T
M
L
K
K
A
A
T
Yeah
Lynn
Johnson
here
I'm,
chairman
of
our
group,
and
to
refresh
your
memory.
Maybe
we
need
to
we,
we
put
up
the
helicopter
a
year
ago
and
we
felt
it
after
it
was
done.
We
we
didn't
feel
we
had
quite
complete.
We
would
like
to
add
some
more
sidewalk
around
the
edge
and
fill
in
some
more
dirt
around
the
edge.
Also
finish
out
the
we
have
a
nice
sign
on
the
west
side
when
you
come
into
the
park,
but
there's
nothing
that
identifies
this
very
much
from
the
South
Lake
Drive.
T
So
we
we
have
the
ingredients
that
we
would
like
to
put
a
sign
up
facing
the
South
Lake
Drive,
similar
to
the
sign.
That's
up
on
the
west
side.
We
feel
that
would
identify
us
give
more
complete
the
project
of
the
helicopter.
So
we
last
fall.
We
went
to
the
Watertown
Community
Foundation
and
played
for
the
money
that
was
estimated.
It
would
cost
bid
and
they
immediately
what
was
$8,500.
T
So
they
immediately
gave
us
and
said
we
they
would.
They
would
do
half
of
that
if
we
could
raise
the
other
half
for
from
other
sources.
So
that's
right,
like
last
fall,
we
came
to
the
council
here
and
I
believe
was
postponed
until
the
April
meeting
because
of
budget
concerns,
and
since
then
we
have
had
eleven
hundred
dollars
given
to
us
for
this
fund.
So
our
current
needs
would
be
thirty.
Two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
to
do
comply
with
the
Community
Foundation's
request,
and
so
that
would
be
the
price
that
we.
R
We
just
want
it.
You
understand,
clarify
that
the
water
talk
community
foundation
authorized
us
forty,
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
I
think
it
was,
and
they
will
match
that.
You
know
what
donations
from
other
sources.
They
will
match
that
up
to
forty
two
hundred
fifty
they're
not
going
to
give
us
the
whole
forty
to
fifty
we've
got.
You
know,
we've
got.
A
So
there
are,
there
are
ways
that
you
guys
could
do
this.
You
know
you
do
have
dollars
in
your
special
special
funds
that
the
council
could
do
if
you
wanted
to
I
think
there's
what
about
eight
thousand
dollars
left
in
that
particular
fund.
So
if
you
were
inclined
to
do
it
that
way,
you
could
get
those
dollars
there.
I
don't
know
Shelley.
Oh,
there
are
other
areas
that
could
easily
be
be
a
check
written
off.
It.
E
R
A
F
N
A
Okay,
and
are
you
done
okay
I
just
wanted
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
John
and
I
did
go
to
Minneapolis
for
the
Minnesota
sportsman
show
it
was
a
great
turnout.
They
had
thousands
and
thousands
of
people
there.
We
we
did
giveaway
up
I
believe
it
was
a
hummingbird,
he
looks
five
depth-finder
and
it
was
a
huge
hit.
We
had
I,
don't
know.
We
gave
away
2,500
books
and
everybody
that
wanted
to
sign
up
had
to
take
a
book.
All.
A
A
Like
to
mention
that
some
of
the
biggest
names
that
were
talked
about
it
to
show
was
the
the
Redlands
Center
was
mentioned
and
and
blush
their
art
Webster
Webster
area
in
South
Dakota
is
a
big
hit
with
Minnesota
people,
because
they've
got
the
facilities
for
them
to
go.
Fishing
at
they've
got
the
facilities
that
clean
their
fish.
A
A
In
heaven
we
were
talking
to
everybody,
so
number
22
any
leaves
on
remember
course:
okay,
you
know
there
is
a
need
to
go
into
executive
session.
It
won't
be
very
long.
I
would
expect
some
action
to
be
taken,
so
at
this
time,
I
need
a
motion,
a
second
for
executive
session
which
by
Bruce
second
by
Mike.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
motion
carries
a
secular
session.
It
won't
be
long.