►
From YouTube: BOA Joint & Regular Meetings 10 06 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
We
would
acknowledge
that
this
is
listed
use
and
the
applicant
made
his
application
at
the
appropriate
time
for
his
property
that
this
boathouse
within
50
feet
of
the
high-water
mark
as
I
said,
is
allowable
and
it
would
not
adversely
affect
the
public
interest
and
I'm
I,
don't
see
any
conditions
that
we
would
specifically
need
to
add.
I.
A
Guess
one
point:
if
you're
looking
for
any
direction
out
of
me
from
staff
again
ingress
egress
lighting
trash
utilities,
those
are
the
things
that
we
consider
with
a
conditional
use.
Permit
request.
I
see
nothing
based
on
the
proposed
location
of
where
he's
going
to
be.
Where
he's
going
to
have
a
problem
with
those
things,
I
did
have
one
individual
contact
me
wondering
information,
but
you
can
see
with
the
trees
that
are
located
here.
They're
established,
trees,
they'll
likely
cover
the
shed.
How.
A
Feet
about
the
location
you
see
this
this
X
here
and
Tim's
here,
if
to
prove
me
wrong.
If
I
am
wrong,
I'm
not
100%
sure
that
that's
the
right
spot,
but
it
remains
the
property
remains
pretty
flat
from
about
now.
There's
probably
about
two
feet
of
grade
from
here
to
here,
and
then
about
seven
feet
from
here.
Up
to
here
is
is.
B
D
D
C
A
A
C
C
A
A
It's
it's
an
application
to
have
a
contractor
contractor
yard
and
shop
on
property,
described
as
the
East
1120
of
the
South
1625
of
the
southwest
quarter,
less
bones
addition
and
less
TT
addition
and
last
lot:
h2
in
Section,
35,
a
lot
of
words
to
say
just
west
of
town,
a
half
mile
west
of
ram
coda
or
the
old
plateau.
I
guess
is
what
I'd
think
of
little
ways.
What's
the
discount
seeds
in
this
green
dot,
just
west
of
city
limits
and
touching
city
limits,
the.
A
The
applicants
requesting
sorry
the
applicant
operates
an
excavation
business
and
currently
parks
his
equipment
of
various
locations
around
town
and
is
intending
to
level
an
area
for
gravel
parking
places,
skid-steer
loaders
excavators
and
graders,
and
intends
to
construct
a
barn
on
the
property
within
five
years
with
a
long-range
plan.
That
would
probably
that
would
be
to
subdivide
the
property.
But
that's
it
sounds
like
it's
a
ways
down.
The
road.
I
should
note
that
this,
the
applicant,
the
applicant
and
the
property
owner,
not
one
in
the
same,
however,
they
did
application.
A
A
It's
planned
for
future
industrial
growth
within
the
city
of
water
towns,
land-use
plan,
I,
should
know
typically,
land
proposed
to
be
changed
from
an
acre
agricultural
use
to
more
of
a
commercial
use,
has
been
required
to
be
annexed
into
city
limits.
Before
our
change
in
use,
the
board
is
going
to
need
to
determine
whether
this
change
and
use
warrants
need
an
X
before
change.
A
Ultimately,
the
disturbance
of
more
than
one
acre
for
what
it's
worth
would
require
a
storm
stormwater
permit
from
DNR,
and
the
applicant
would
need
to
verify
the
d-o-t
will
allow
existing
access
to
continue
to
be
used
for
the
proposed
use.
The
will
have
specific
requirements
listed
in
the
ordinance
for
contractor
shops
and
yards
in
this
area.
However,
in
the
past,
where
we've
had
these
requests,
we
have
required
planting
of
at
least
two
rows
of
five
to
seven
foot
tall
evergreen
trees,
spaced
about
25
feet.
A
A
If
a
building
is
built,
it
would
need
to
be
built
according
to
International,
Building
Code
and
any
parking
spaces
for
employees
would
have
to
be
paved.
However,
I
don't
think
that
probably
applies
here
in
the
end
when
you're
voting
here
and
I'll
read
through
suggested
findings
and
conditions
in
a
minute,
but
basically
board
for
your
information.
F
A
We
grant
the
conditional
use
without
them
being
annexed,
or
do
we
require
them
to
be
annexed
before
this
turns
into
this
sort
of
a
use.
Historically,
as
I
said,
any
change
in
use
to
a
more
of
a
commercial
or
industrial
has
been
required
to
be
annexed.
We
have
done
a
couple
of
them
where
we
have
permitted
them
on
the
condition
that
they
annex
within
a
year.
Most
recent
examples
I
can
give.
You
would
be
Strom
Seth's
property
where
there's
a
truck
terminal
out
east
of
town
on
31st.
The
other
example
is
just
west
of
here.
A
You
can
barely
see
it
on
this
map
here
right
here
we
did
the
same
thing.
We
permitted
a
storage
building
there
and
they
annexed
within
a
year
as
well,
so
that
was
those
were
the
conditions
that
we
had
there,
where
they're
already
adjacent
to
city
limits.
The
rest
of
them
have
been
required
to
be
annexed.
A
A
Let's
put
it
this
way,
if,
if
denied
the
the
reasoning
possible
reasoning,
unless
you
have
a
different
one,
would
be
that
the
proposed
use
could
be
accommodated
within
city
limits
and
may
dilute
municipal
and
commercial
industrial
districts
and
would
be
contrary
to
the
land
use
plans
in
areas
of
development
transition,
annexation
of
land
adjacent
to
municipal
corporate
limits
and
sanitary
sewer
is
encouraged
prior
to
development.
Commercial
industrial
development,
which
can
be
accommodated
within
town,
should
be
a
municipal.
Commercial
districts
should
be
protected
and
should
not
be
diluted
by
scattered
commercial
development.
A
Suggested
conditions
would
be
that
the
applicant
agrees
to
plant
two
to
five
rows
are
sorry,
two
rows
of
five
to
seven
foot
tall
evergreen
space,
not
more
than
25
feet.
Apart
to
screen
any
materials
that
would
be
stored
outside
from
the
east,
south
and
west,
any
vehicles
or
equipment
associated
with
the
business
would
be
allowed
to
be
stored
outside.
Of
course,
all
vehicles
and
equipment
stored
outside
would
be
stored
in
the
rows.
All
vehicles
start
out,
sided
be
operable,
there'd
be
no
junk
stored
outside
be
no
off-premise
signs
or.
A
Signage
associated
with
the
contractors
yard,
the
storage
or
equipment
and
materials
will
not
be
carried
out
in
a
manner
which
would
create
a
breeding
ground
for
rodents.
Noxious
weeds
need
to
be
controlled,
the
permit
for
a
contractor
shop
and
yard
would
not
be
transferable.
Subsequent
owners
would
need
to
apply
for
another
conditional
use
permit.
G
A
A
point
that
you,
this
board
would
have
to
decide
what
the
trigger
mechanism
would
be
for
that.
So
I
can
write
that
in
two
points
into
here
as
well.
I've
got
highlighted
weren't
on
our
report
on
our
website,
but
applicant
agrees
to
provide
documentation
from
d-o-t,
verifying
that
they've
reviewed
and
approved
the
access
for
the
proposed
property
in
use
and
that
any
future
structures
shall
be
reviewed
for
compliance
with
restrictions
on
building
height
and
reference
to
approach
and
runway
protection
zones,
given
where
it's
at
with
the
airport
and
then.
Lastly,
we
have
our
normal.
A
H
No
I
think
he
pretty
much
covered
it.
I
mean
I,
don't
I
want
to
use
it
as
a
contractor's
yard
parking
equipment
and
in
five
years
I'd
like
to
put
up
some
kind
of
well.
He
said
it
was
a
barn.
It
looked
like
a
barn,
but
you
would
enter
it
from
the
back.
It
would
be
a
heated
shop
and
I
guess.
I
I
would
like
to
clean
it
up
a
little
more
than
it
is.
You
know,
but
I
do
want
to
farm
the
majority
of
it.
A
H
G
B
A
I
H
H
H
C
A
C
H
G
E
C
F
Ruth,
how
rude
my
husband
and
I
owned
the
Gaylord
bone
farm
that
Dennis
alluded
to
right
adjacent
to
this
property,
so
we
just
would
like
to
be
informed
as
to
if
any
impact
that
would
have
on
our
property.
If
Lorne
is
allowed
to
develop
this
land,
then
does
that
impact
us
at
all?
As
far
as
our
driveway
would
he
have
to
create
his
own
access
to
that
property
that
he
is
looking
at
purchasing?
Okay,.
A
There
is
a
portion
of
an
agreement
that
that
indicates
that
eventually
this
this
road
may
have
to
come
through
and
across
and
I
think.
That's
probably
a
part
of
the
question
for
one
of
the
one
of
the
primary
reasons
that
I
had
added
in
there,
that
a
condition
of
approval
would
need
to
be
that
that
highway
access
be
verified
by
the
state
is
because
of
that
right
now,
direct
access
to
this
property
is
is
given
by
these
two
approaches.
A
A
Is
the
expected
location
of
access?
However,
we
would
need
verification
from
the
state
before
he
could
start
pulling
stuff
out
to
there
that
he
does
have
access
at
those
locations,
because
anytime
I
use
changes,
they
need
to
review
access
and
they'll
either
tell
him.
This
is
not
a
change
in
use,
or
else
we
need
to
look
at
it
and
we
just
need
to
know
what
that
conversation
is.
The.
I
B
A
G
F
I
So
there
is
the
East
approach
which
would
be
on
the
proposed
property
were
discussing
here.
That
evidently
was
put
in
when
the
highway
was
widened,
but
we
don't
know
nobody
had
knows
or
in
the
lore.
Maybe
that's
a
question.
You
have
used
research
buying
this
property,
but
is
that
access
for
you
listed
I
mean?
Is
that
an
access
you're
planning
on
being
able
to
use
mr.
Bello
can.
H
B
B
E
A
C
Is
there
anyone
else
in
this
audience?
Who
wishes
to
speak
to
this
particular
issue
tonight
Mertz
afternoon,
okay,
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
hearing,
Luke
I,
have
a
question:
the
verbage
on
F
number
one.
The
applicant
agrees
plant
two
rose
five
to
seven,
four
to
Evergreen
space,
not
more
than
25
feet
apart.
That's
pretty
common
language
in
the
county
here,
if
he
plans
to
develop
that
in
the
future,
whatever
his
setbacks
from
the
property
lines
to
put
those
trees.
A
G
A
A
D
C
B
Dennis
and
I
had
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
earlier,
and
my
thought
was
my
original
thought
was
as
24
acres.
It's
used
mostly
as
AG
land
as
far
as
the
annexation
are
bringing
it
in
or
out
of
the
city.
I
thought
it'd
be
more.
It
would
apply
more
at
the
time
of
a
building
permit.
You
know
we're
gonna,
look
at
it
when.
B
B
We
wouldn't
is
that
from
from
a
city
standpoint,
I
didn't
have
a
problem
with
it
being
left
as
it
is
in
the
county
until
the
time
of
permit
the
only
question
I
had
is,
do
we
say
yeah
he
has
to
annex
it
into
the
city
at
the
time
that
the
building
permits
going
to
be
applied,
or
do
you
put
a
time
of
or
five
years
you
know
when,
when
they
say,
I'm
gonna
put
up
a
building
in
five
years?
That's
a
lot
of
time,
normally
we'll.
B
B
Is
such
a
long
range
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
handcuff
him
to
five
years
that
he
has
to
annex
in
or
if
we
just
say
to
the
building
permit
as
far
as
the
stipulations,
the
a
through
G,
those
all
made
sense
to
us,
that's
what
we
would
ask
for
anyway
and
then
have
a
man
extended.
You
know
it
may
never.
Eight
may.
B
I
That's
what
Pat
and
I
discussed
the
and,
for
the
sake
of
maybe
reiterating
what
he
just
said,
I
I
believe
once
mr.
Bell
comes
in
a
request,
a
building
permit
to
do
something.
Then
a
lot
of
other
things
and
I
think
the
annexation
would
come
at
the
same
time,
then
just
to
take
that
piece
of
property
and
develop
and
clean
it
up
and
park
some
equipment
in
there
following
these
guidelines,
I,
don't
feel
that
would
need
to
be
annexed
into
the
city
at
this
time.
I
Number
one
under
F
I
question
a
little
bit
too,
because
if,
if
and
when
the
time
did
come
that
he
annexed
into
the
city,
those
trees
that
are
probably
all
get
destroyed,
we
could
put
them
in
there
now
at
25
feet
and
then,
whether
it's
two
years
or
five
years
or
seven
years,
you
have
to
dig
them
all
out,
tear
them
all
out.
So
if
we
were
gonna
require
trees
to
be
planted
this
time,
I,
don't
I
wouldn't
require
that
I
wouldn't
be
in
favor
of
saying
25
feet.
I
I
think
the
buffer
is
good,
but
the
25
feet
I'm
afraid
to
be
a
waste
of
money.
One
other
thing:
five
years,
no
matter
when
he
does
at
weather.
Does
it
next
summer
times
are
good
or
times
really
get
tough
and
he
can't
do
it
for
seven
years.
The
point
is
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
say
five
years
or
three
years
or
seven
years,
I
think
it's
when
he
comes
in
to
request
a
building
permit
and
all
these
other
things
kick
into
place.
That's
what
I
would
feel.
I
A
Typically,
the
county
has
his
funnel
commercial
industrial
uses
into
town
is
a
bottom-line
part
of
the
reason
is
to
make
sure
that
things
don't
spiral
and
get
get
a
get
harder
to
control.
There
are
some
contractor
shops
yards
around
city
limits
that
aren't
in
city
limits
that
have
done
that
in
the
past.
I.
Don't
really
expect
that
to
happen
to
mr.
belt
here,
but
that's
one
of
the
things.
A
The
other
thing
we
do
have
to
keep
in
mind
is,
as
we
do
this
make
sure
that
we're
okay
with
that
sort
of
thing
going
into
the
future,
with
with
other
properties
as
they
get
close.
If
there's
a
similar
idea,
I
know,
there's
a
property,
that's
surrounded
by
city
limits
just
to
the
east
of
here
it
has
power
lines
or
the
top
of
it.
That
would
make
pretty
good
sense
to
do
something
similar,
and
so
again
we
keep
in
mind
that
someone
has
to
do
this.
We
we
need
to
be
consistent.
A
C
Just
follow
up
a
little
bit,
Brendan
Luke
I've
been
talking
about
for
with
the
city.
Gentlemen,
here
part
of
the
reason
that
County,
when
something
is
this
close
to
the
city
or
is
partly
surrounded
by
the
city,
that
the
county
has
pretty
much
encouraged
them
just
go
into.
The
city
is
because
we
don't
want
and
I'm
not
referring
to
mr.
C
Bell,
particularly,
but
we
don't
want
situations
where
all
of
a
sudden,
we
have
people
wanting
to
stay
just
outside
of
the
city
limits
to
avoid
the
taxes
and
to
avoid
other
issues
and
then
hope
that
they
get
grandfathered
in
someday
with
some
things
that
aren't
compliant
with
what
the
city
may
may
require.
And
oh
we're
talking
just
a
lot
here,
destroy
our
machinery
on,
but
we
set
a
precedent
then
that
okay,
just
on
the
edge
of
the
city,
you
can
start
doing
these
kinds
of
things
and
the
county
is
okay.
G
C
L
L
Guess
you're
gonna
have
to
clarify
because
I'm
still
confused
I
mean
is
he
gonna
have
to
use
that
West's
approach
I
mean
or
can
we
I
guess
I'm
not
comfortable
and
having
him
use
that
West's
approach
I'd
like
to
really
find
out
if
he
could
use
that
East
approach?
So
he's
not,
you
know
using
somebody
else's
because
he's
gonna
have
to
go
across
their
land
to
get
into
his,
even
though
it's
a
small
amount,
yeah.
A
Enough
top
of
my
head
I,
that's
gonna,
be
entirely
controlled
by
the
state
as
to
how
how
they
would
handle
that
it
is
possible
that
they
would
have
to
share
that
that
west
access,
that's
on
that
property
and
go
across
on
an
easement.
But
again
that's
it's
also
possible
that
they
may
say
this.
Isn't
a
significant
change
in
you
see
their
I.
Don't
know
what
they'll
wind
up
saying
on
it,
so
I'm
afraid.
I
can't
answer
that.
How.
A
Don't
think
it
usually
takes
all
that
along
with,
because
that's
the
question
that
can
be
answered
here
at
this
local
office,
but
I
will
also
say
that,
for
what
it's
worth
I
mean
mr.
Bell's
been
told
that
he
should
expect
that
he's
going
to
be
using
this
approach.
Not
these
so
I
best
available
data
at
this
time
is
that's.
What's
going
to
happen,
I
don't.
J
Know
but
the
county
did
put
an
application
into
the
d-o-t
for
that
property,
because
we
would
need
a
separate
access
as
well
it.
It
was
a
little
more
process
for
that
I.
Don't
know.
We
never
really
did
here,
because
it
kind
of
got
dropped
with
the
whole
boat
or
whatever,
but
it
does
need
to
go
beyond
this
office
for
that
particular
access
and
it
had
to
go
to
the
State
Board.
So.
G
A
C
G
C
Right
on
highway
81
going
towards
the
interstate
there,
and
he
wanted
to
do
industrial
type
uses
on
that
and
we
denied
him
multiple
times
on
that
piece
of
property
for
for
a
building
or
just
to
utilize
it
to
utilize
it
for
anything
other
than
a
because
he
wanted
to
do
different
commercial
want
to
sell
my
used
farm
machinery.
There
start
an
auction
different.
C
I
Okay,
well,
maybe
you've
partly
answered
my
question
or
my
comment
might
be
affected
by
your
answer
here.
But
what
I
was
what
I
was
trying
to?
In
my
own
mind,
say
what
would
be
the
difference
if
the
farmer
next
door
wanted
to
park,
his
four-wheel
drive
tractor
there
and
a
couple
of
discs
and
things
which
which
they
could
do
versus
mr.
Bell
Park
and
a
couple
of
pieces
of
construction
equipment
there,
because.
C
It
goes
from
AG
to
industrial
use
and
that's
part
of
the
reason.
Let
me
just
back
up
you're
part
of
the
reason
these
situations
are
probably
dealt
with
better
in
the
city
is
because
you
have
better
regulations
to
control
if
they
get
out
of
hand
out
in
the
country.
We
have
some
farmsteads
that
are
absolutely
the
beautiful.
C
We
have
some
that
don't
take
care
of
the
property
it's
hard
to
get
after
one
and
not
get
after
all,
where
we
have
one
right
on
19th
Street,
that's
been
a
problem,
it's
in
the
county
and
it
could
be
dealt
with
better
in
the
city.
You
have
better
regulations
to
deal
with
that.
That's
part
of
the
reason
awesome.
A
Me
get
us
caught
up
on
a
motion.
That's
there
first,
okay,
right
now,
unless
someone
wants
to
specify
differently
what
we've
got
in
there
for
conditions,
and
it
would
be
as
of
now-
and
someone
could
certainly
change.
This
applicant
agrees
to
plant
two
rows
of
five
to
seven
foot
evergreen
space,
not
more
than
25
feet.
Apart
to
screen
materials
stored
from
the
east,
south
and
west,
only
vehicles
associated
with
this
business
would
be
allowed
on
the
site.
All
vehicles
and
equipment
start
outside
or
in
knee
rolls
Rose
all
vehicles.
Third
outside
shall
be
operable.
F
A
Or
on-premise
signage
associated
with
this
permit,
storage
of
equipment
and
materials
will
not
be
carried
out
in
a
manner
which
creates
breeding
grounds
for
rodents.
The
permit
is
not
transferable
I'm
not
going
to
read
these
word
for
word,
the
the
blank
that
I
asked
you
to
fill
in
earlier.
The
applicant
agrees
to
annex
into
the
city
of
Watertown
upon
application
for
a
building
permit
on
this
property.
That
was
a
blank.
I
asked
you
to
fill
in.
A
That's
what
I
hear
and
then,
when
the
property
is
annexed,
the
applicant
agrees
to
abide
by
the
city's
rules
at
the
time.
With
regard
to
connection
to
sewer,
paving
that
sort
of
thing
applicant
agrees
to
provide
documentation
from
d-o-t
verifying
that
they
have
reviewed
and
approved
of
the
access
wherever
that
access
is
for
the
property,
any
future
structures
shall
be
reviewed
for
compliance
with
restrictions
on
building
height
and
reference
to
approach
and
runway
zones.
A
Those
are
the
canoe
I
would
ask
for
clarification
before
a
vote
where
trees
would
be
suggested
or
allowed
if
they'd
be
allowed
right
up
to
property
lines
or
if
you
would
expect
them
to
be
150
feet
off
or
somewhere
in
between.
My
suggestion
would
be
on
the
south
between
80
and
100
feet
from
the
right
away
line,
because
the
long-term
plan
would
be
to
have
this
service
road
is
likely
to
come
through
long
term
and
so
it'd
be
only
wisest
to
keep
those
trees
off
of
that
right-of-way.
A
C
I
C
I
I
Certainly
on
the
east
and
the
west
side,
I
don't
see
any
reason,
with
the
trees
being
closer
to
the
property
line.
We've
got
both
property
owners.
Here,
we've
got
the
county
here
and
we've
got
the
people
who
live
on
the
west
side.
I
would
think
a
buffer,
for
them
would
be
an
advantage
either
ways
something
the
property
line
or
close
to
the
property
line
would
be
fine
before
I
answer
the
South.
I
Let
me
go
back
to
asking
the
county
a
question
when,
when
the
building
that
the
county
is
proposing,
what
do
you
have
the
new
jail?
Just
look,
my
name
the
term
you
put
on
it
yeah
at
that
time,
you
were,
you
said
you
were
talking
to
DoD.
Was
it
proposed
that
that
service
road
would
have
been
put
in
at
that
time?
Was
that
being
discussed
along
with
everything
else?
Could
I
know
you're
quite
a
ways
down
the
road
in
those
discussions,
because
that
affects
where
these
trees
would
go.
J
J
I
A
A
I
B
Because
look
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
if
we,
if
we
have
a
Manik
sat
in
he's,
gonna,
have
to
plot
it
and
break
it
up,
it's
24
acres
and
then
at
this
point
he
doesn't
even
know
where
his
buildings
going
to
be
into
the
future.
But
we're
gonna
ask
him
to
annex
it
in
Zona,
plat
it
and
establish
lot
lines
which
it's
a
virtual
guess
for
him
right
now.
My.
A
A
C
A
C
F
M
C
I
I
No
job
the
tree
that
would
be
an
amendment
than
to
the
existing
motion.
Okay,
then
I'd
make
motion
to
amend
the
original
motion
to
have
the
trees
on
the
east
and
the
west
side
beyond
the
property
line
or
just
right
inside
the
property
line
and
the
trees
on
the
south
be
I.
Think
Luke,
you
said
eighty
feet
from
the
right
away:
okay,.
C
C
A
I
A
G
C
Case
the
amendment
will
pass
now.
I
want
to
go
down
board
members
to
number
10,
and
it
says
the
applicant
agrees:
the
annexation
of
the
city
of
Watertown
connection
to
the
city
of
arts
on
sanitary
sewer
system
and
hereby
ways
right
to
protest
and
I'm,
not
gonna.
Read
it
all
either
because
it
gets
into
the
legal
description.
A
Basically
mr.
Chairman
I
I
think
for
for
procedural
sake.
We
probably
should
have
a
formal
motion
to
say
what
I
had
said
earlier,
which
is
at
the
time
of
a
building
permit
to
amend
that
to
say
that
annexation
would
be
required
at
prior
to
issuance
of
any
building
permits
on
this
property,
which
is
what
was
discussed
there.
And
we
probably
should
have
a
formal
amendment.
Just
to
that
point.
Just
to
say
that
four.
G
K
C
C
G
A
The
applicant
will
agree
to
annex
prior
to
the
issuance
of
any
building
permit,
and
that
goes
for
applicant
agrees
to
annex
prior
to
the
issuance
of
any
building,
permit
and
waives
the
right
to
protest
connection
to
City
sewer
at
that
time.
If
so
needed
and
applicant
agrees
for
number
11
applicant
agrees
to
annex
prior
to
issuance
of
any
building
permits
and
agrees
to
meet
all
requirements,
the
city
of
Watertown
regarding
pavement
and
parking
and
loading
areas
at
the
time
of
annexation.
Okay,.
I
A
J
J
A
Have
the
county
has
on
home
occupations
and
even
in
some
commercial
businesses,
I
think
I
saw
an
individual
here
who
was
involved
in
that
conversation
a
while
back,
but
I'll
leave
that
up
to
you.
If
you
want
to
specify
a
number
or
you
just
want
to
say
we're,
okay
as
long
as
it
screened.
That's
really
up
to
you!
That's.
C
A
Along
212
for
what
it's
worth,
we
have
kind
of
Clark
Electric,
which
was
required
to
put
up
a
fence
if
they're
going
to
be
storing
stuff
outside
they've
done
that
we
have
grand
guard,
did
not
grand
guard
anymore,
I,
think
it's
a
tech,
sewer,
probably
I,
think,
is
what
it's
called
now
when
they
went
up.
We
required
two
rows
of
five
to
seven
foot
tall
evergreens
and
we
did
not
put
a
number
because
it
was
going
to
be
screened,
I
will
say
in
the
AG
district,
though
it's
pretty
hard
and
fast.
A
C
J
A
Do
fortunately,
or
unfortunately,
have
one
one
question
of
interpretation
I
wanted
to
run
by
you
and
I
appreciate
the
audience
sticking
around.
We
had
a
question
come
up
just
this
week
that
an
individual
was
asking
whether
or
not
he
could
on
a
lake
Park
District
construct
a
construct,
a
garage
you
would
for
all
practical
purposes.
Look
like
a
residential
storage
garage.
It's
in
the
lake
park
district,
where
accessory
uses
without
a
primary
structure
are
not
allowed.
A
G
C
B
M
B
M
M
G
I
B
You
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
922
minutes
which
aren't
ready
so
we're
going
to
skip
item
number
one
and
go
on
to
number
two
applicant
Patricia
Schwartz
permit
number
one
702
460
conditional
use
to
operate
a
home
daycare.
Business
in
ER
are
three
multifamily
residents
at
eight
18th
Street
Southwest.
M
Yes,
the
applicant
seeks
to
to
operate
a
home
daycare
business
from
her
single-family
dwelling
property
located
in
the
are
three
multifamily
district
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
section
21
to
zero
zero,
three
one
and
twenty
one
1403
one
and
five
and
contingent
upon
compliance
with
chapter
twenty
one.
Seventy
which
is
home
occupations
and
specific
rules
governing
conditional
uses,
including,
but
not
limited
to
2100
202
to
be
six
a
through
H.
A
daycare
home
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
are
three
multi-family
two
residential
district
for
2103
one
and
twenty
one
1403
one
and
five.
M
As
stated
previously.
Such
facilities
shall
provide
not
less
than
35
square
feet
of
interior
floor
area
and
50
square
feet
of
outdoor
recreation
space
for
each
child.
In
addition,
such
facilities
shall
supply
adequate
off-street
parking
or
other
suitable
plan
for
the
loading
and
unloading
of
children
so
as
not
to
obstruct
public
streets
or
create
other
traffic
or
safety
hazards.
The
applicant
is
regularly
utilizing
the
main
level
of
her
2528
square-foot
single-family
dwelling
for
her
daycare
business.
M
The
property
surpasses
the
minimum
square
footage
of
interior
floor
area
and
soon
to
be
fenced
outdoor
recreation,
space
required
for
twelve
children
for
city
ordinance.
Twenty-One
1403
one
Swartz
plans
to
be
registered
with
the
state.
The
applicant
submitted
a
written
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plans
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance.
M
Clients
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance
21:02
o2
to
be
6a
through
H
are
the
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
that
involves
ingress
and
egress
to
the
property
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
rest
of
the
area.
Those
are
the
basic
basic
requirements
of
meeting
those
for
conditional
use.
This
property
has
an
approximately
twenty
four
foot:
wide
paved
driveway
parking
area
allowing
for
a
maximum
of
two
legal
off
street
parking
spaces.
M
The
minimum
number
of
legal
sized
and
durable
surfaced
off
street
parking
spaces
required
for
just
the
single-family
dwelling
uses
to
this
board
may
consider
requiring
additional
compliant
off
street
parking
spaces
as
a
condition
of
secondary
use
approval
and
to
comply
with
21
1403
one
for
the
safe
loading
and
unloading
of
the
children.
Chapter
20
170
is
home
occupations
and
standards.
We
note
that
Schwartz
has
acknowledged
by
signature
her
assurance
to
comply,
that
is
in
your
packet.
M
No
signage
is
proposed
at
this
time:
chapter
21,
sixty-three
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards
that
I
previously
described
2165
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses,
I'm
sure
it
will
be
typical
to
the
average
single-family
dwelling
and
21
chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
Infrastructure
is
compliant
Boulevard.
Trees
are
lacking,
there's
mature
front
yard
trees
very
close
to
the
sidewalk
and
probably
not
room
to
to
put
in
Boulevard
trees.
At
this
time.
B
M
M
O
O
B
Any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
anyone
else
like
to
speak
in
public
hearing
before
I
close.
It
say
none
I'll
close
for
the
public
here
and
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
sänger
by
mr.
stone
burger
any
other
discussion.
Any
questions
see
not
asked
for
vote
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
item
number
3
applicant
calvin
john
permit
number
1,
702
v,
seasick
conditional
use
approval
to
operate
a
home-based,
handyman
blade,
sharpening
business
at
401,
16th
Street,
northeast.
M
The
definition
of
home
occupation
is
that
any
occupation
which
is
clearly
secondary
to
the
main
use
of
the
premises
as
a
dwelling
and
does
not
change
the
character
thereof
or
have
any
exterior
evidence
of
such
secondary
use
other
than
a
non
illuminated
sign,
not
exceeding
400
square
inches
in
area.
This
occupation
shall
be
carried
on
or
conducted
only
by
the
members
of
a
family
residing
in
the
dwelling.
M
The
applicant
submitted
a
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plans
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance
21:02
o2
to
be
6
A
through
H.
Again,
our
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
and
generally
include
ingress
and
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
M
The
site
plan
and
written
request
are
in
your
packet,
so
you
can
check
that
out
for
those
items,
chapter
xx,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards,
Kelvin
John
proposes
to
utilize
the
single-family
dwellings,
490
square
foot
third
garage
stall
for
his
business.
He
has
acknowledged
by
signature
his
assurance
to
comply
with
chapter
20,
170
Sean
lor
Ben,
Ben
John,
currently
utilizes
385
square
feet
of
the
single-family
doing
for
her
hair
salon
business.
She
she
has
previously
gone
through
the
conditional
use
process
and
was
approved
and
I
believe
that
was
back
in
2012.
M
So
together
they
will
utilize
16%
of
the
single-family
dwelling
for
the
business
purposes.
No
signage
is
proposed
at
this
time:
chapter
21,
63,
off-street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
There.
Sufficient
area
exists
for
at
least
three
legal
off
street
parking
spaces.
M
Chapter
21,
65,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses
per
21-7
double-o
to
no
outdoor
storage
of
equipment
or
materials
used
in
the
home
occupation
shall
be
permitted
and
no
public
display
of
goods
she'll
be
allowed
on
the
premises
except
inside
the
principal
building,
chapter
21,
73
and
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
Property
lacks
the
required
Boulevard,
trees
and
sidewalk,
fulfillment
of
which
may
be
considered
as
a
condition
of
approval.
M
This
board
must
determine
if
the
request
shows
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
concerning
chapter
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards,
21
o
202
to
v6
a
through
H
specific
girls
governing
individual
conditional
uses
in
chapters
21,
63,
65
and
73.
If
endorsed
this
board
may
consider
imposing
any
conditions
of
approval
deemed
necessary
for
this
additional
secondary
use.
B
M
B
M
G
Q
B
Q
There
that's
deep
enough
that
I
can
get
a
vehicle
in
there
hand
a
shop
or
add
two
benches
is
all
it
is.
There's
just
two
benches
like
I
said:
I
mean
to
sharpen
lawnmower
blades,
you
need
about
two
little
belt
Sanders
and
a
grinder,
and
that's
it
so
the
equipment's
already
in
there
I
mean
it's
and
there's
a
vehicle
in
there
and
there's.
There's
grass
containers
in
there
and
garbage
cans
and
I
mean
it's
I'll
be
visit.
It's
probably
30
some
feet
deep.
Q
So
it's
a
there's
plenty
of
room
in
the
front
of
that
in
the
front
of
the
vehicle.
To
have
my
two
little
benches
there
and,
like
you
said
it
right
now,
I
don't
know,
I
mean
I'm
retiring
March,
1st,
so
I
really
don't
know
how
much
business
I'm
gonna
get.
You
know
she's
been
closed.
Her
dales
been
closed
for
almost
a
year,
so
I
mean
there's,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
whether
it's
gonna
work
or
not,
but
I
just
thought.
I
should
approach
the
city
before
I
did
too
much
anyway.
So.
B
Thank
You
anyone
else
here
to
speak
in
the
public
hearing
scene
on
I'll
close.
The
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
Stein.
Second,
second
by
mr.
Hanson,
any
other
discussion.
Any
questions
seeing
none
ask
for
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
item
number
4
applicant
prime
site
center,
LLC
permit
number
1,
702,
6,
seeking
and
conditional
use
to
serve
for
the
sale
serving
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages
in
a
commercial
property
located
at
1920
333
and
201
3
Willow
Creek
Drive.
M
Applicant
seeks
approval
for
the
sale
serving
and
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages
at
this
property
located
in
the
C
3
highway
commercial,
gt1
gateway
overlay
and
a1
agricultural
districts,
pursuant
to
section
21,
2803,
3,
bar
or
tavern,
and
contingent
upon
compliance
with
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
including,
but
not
limited
to
21
Oh
OH
to
be
6a
through
H
bar
Tavern
is
a
listed
conditional
use
in
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
for
21:28
o33.
If
approved
the
tenants
leasing.
Space
in
these
buildings
will
apply
to
the
City
Council
for
both
on
sale
and
off
sale.
M
Alcoholic
beverage
licenses
note
that
this
is
not
required
note
that
it
is
not
required
that
property
approved
under
this
conditional
use,
permit
reappear
before
this
board
for
changes
to
their
alcoholic
beverage
license
location
is
usually
something
that
is
considered
in
these
types
of
conditional
uses.
However,
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
is
exempt
from
this
section
of
the
ordinance.
So
we
don't
need
to
consider
that
closeness
to
boys
and
girls
clubs,
things
like
that.
The
following
requirements
and
regulations
of
the
ordinance
are
to
be
considered
for
approval.
M
Applicants
submitted
a
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plans
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
terms
of
the
ordinance
again
21:02
o2
to
be
6
through
a
through
H.
Specific
rules
governing
conditional
uses
includes
such
things
as
ingress
and
egress
to
the
property
off
street
off
street
parking
loading
screening,
buffering,
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood.
M
According
to
the
application,
all
signage
will
comply
with
the
sign
ordinance
chapter
21
54,
the
gateway
overlay
district.
The
property
has
been
reviewed
for
compliance
for
with
previous
building
permits,
and
the
gt1
regulations
have
passed
with
each
building.
Permit
they've
been
approved,
chapter
21,
63,
off-street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
Again.
The
building
in
general
complies
with
the
parking
requirements,
chapter
21,
65,
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses.
M
This
was
not
address
necessarily
in
their
site
plan
or
their
letter,
but
we
assume
it
is
typical
to
the
nature
of
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district
for
retail
and
service
establishments,
what
they
will
do:
chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
Two
things
I
pulled
out
as
not
being
addressed.
You
might
want
to
look
into
in
their
in
their
submit
all
lighting
and
required.
M
Screening
of
parking
lot
from
adjacent
residential
residential
used
property
is
not
addressed
and
all
outside
dumpsters
or
other
garbage
receptacles
on
the
site
are
required
to
be
screened
by
an
opaque
fence
or
wall.
According
to
our
ordinance,
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
v6
a
through
H
in
chapters
21
54,
63,
65
and
73
for
such
uses
to
be
operated
at
this
location.
N
M
Actually,
this
board
doesn't
really
decide.
That's
why
I
noted
at
the
very
beginning
that
if,
if
they
change
their
liquor
licenses,
they
don't
have
to
reappear
before
this
board,
so
this
board
has
to
kind
of
see
this
as
a
worst-case
scenario.
If
you
want
to
call
it
that
for
for
all
of
these
uses,
let's
say
they
could
all
have
off
sale.
They
could
all
have
you
know
serving
and
consumption
if
they
are
approved
for
this
site
for
sale
serving
and
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages,
but
their
license
can
change
over
time.
Okay,.
B
Historically,
what
we
do
is
we
approve
the
ground.
That's
under
it
in
that
area
that
zone,
giving
examples
of
a
restaurant
changes
hands
the
conditional
used
to
have
alcohol
on
that
premise
is
goes
with
the
land
basically,
but
the
owners
of
that
business
have
to
go
to
the
City
Council
for
their
that's
kind
of
our
stop-loss.
N
B
B
July
had
one
question:
is
there
any?
This
is
in
the
Gateway
district?
It's
the
first
time.
We've
crossed
this
in
the
gateway
district,
which
is
when
that
was
put
together,
was
put
together
a
little
tighter
than
some
of
the
other
districts.
If
there
any
stipulations
in
that
Gateway
district
that
they
haven't,
I
thought
I
heard
something
on
fencing
your
screen.
Is
there
anything
stipulations
in
that
gateway
district
that
they
haven't
complied
with
to
this
point
before
we
open
any
more
up
the.
M
M
The
only
thing
that
I'm
aware
of
right
now
is
the
the
lack
of
screening
on
their
dumpsters
and
other
garbage
receptacles,
and
that,
because
the
area
around
them
is
developing
fairly
quickly
into
residential
areas,
they
have
not
addressed
possible
screening
to
basically
the
north.
This
this
area
here
will
be
residential
I
believe
we
have
at
least
one
house
there
or
permit
there
to
build.
K
K
B
B
M
B
B
R
Either
Brian
brand
right,
I
own
the
property
on
19th
Street
named
Westminster
Apartments,
which
is
just
north
of
this
property.
If
we
could
put
that
on
the
map,
please
I'm
curious
the
lot
to
the
north
of
this.
The
car
wash
there
how
that's
zoned
I'm
a
little
worried
I
have
a
lot
of
elderly
tenants
in
Westminster
the
property
right
across
the
road
from
the
Westminster.
How
was
that
zoned
with.
R
Never
the
one,
the
one
in
question
we're
talking
about
to
me:
that's
the
West,
okay
yep.
Would
that
automatically
be
a
bar,
a
nightclub?
If
this
passes
this
evening
it
could
I
mean,
could
it
roll
into
that
I
mean
I,
don't
have
a
problem
with
that
this
particular
property,
but
the
one
across
from
the
Westminster.
If,
if
this
one
passes,
then
could
the
next
one
pass
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
I
have
a
nightclub
across
from
my
apartment,
complex,
it's
blank
question.
B
In
the
c3
zona,
a
bar
restaurant
Tavern
is
a
conditional
use
like
mr.
stone
Barger
alluded
to
earlier.
We
had
a
in
the
c3
where
the
old
Dairy
Queen
is
that
as
also
c3
highway
commercial
and
when
the
when
they
went
before
for
the
beer
wine
tavern.
That's
where
it
got
a
little
more
tricky.
It
wasn't:
hey
you're
on
highway
212,
just
like
everybody
else,
and
it
is
fair
for
them.
It's
fair
for
you.
B
We
were
a
little
more
stringent
with
the
regulations
as
to
what
was
going
to
go
on
there
and
how
it
could
go
on
there,
because
it
was
in
close
proximity
to
the
r3.
You
know
it's
just
pure
least,
you
know
speculation,
but
if,
if
that
piece
of
property
were
to
turn
into
a
bar
restaurant
because
it's
closed,
you
got
our
three
in
the
back
and
surrounded
on
three
sides
by
a
residential
zone.
I
think
it
would
be
scrutinized
a
little
closer
than
something
on
in
the
Gateway
zone
or
in
highway,
212
or
uptown.
R
Like
I
said,
I,
probably
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
have
a
problem
with
foot
printing
those
two
buildings
tonight,
but
as
far
as
you
know,
would
it
be
automatic,
like
the
next
person
in
line
would
share
will
just
hand
them
them.
You
know
I
would
hate
to
see
something
across
the
road
from
those
apartments,
but
but.
N
An
answered
the
original
question,
the
property
that
we
were
talking
about
tonight.
If
we
grant
this
and
then
the
City
Council
can
give
a
liquor
license
and
it
could
turn
into
a
bar
in
that
area.
Now,
if
the
other
property
across
from
you,
the
c3
was
proposed,
then
you'd
have
to
come
back
and
voice
your
concerns
and
we
would
hopefully
handle
it
in
a
manner
somewhat
similar
to
Dairy
Queen
or
whatever.
So
you
regulate
it
tight
enough,
so
it
doesn't
turn
into
a
bar.
That's
open
tall!
Well,.
R
B
One
quick
question
from
an
ordinance
standpoint
between
here
all
the
way
through
the
City
Council,
a
nail
salon
that
has
a
beer
wine
license
to
serve
an
occasional
beer
to
to
a
client.
Can
that
property
jump
into
a
bar
tavern
without
them
going
through
any
other
hoops?
Can
they
change
the
name
for
Oscars
nail
salon,
two
shooters.
M
B
It
is
a
carte
blanche
from
our
site.
Is
there
any
other
requirement
for
that?
That
owner
would
then
have
to
go
the
new
owner
if
they
didn't
change
ownership?
If
the
person
who
owned
that
nail
salon
now
says
I'm
gonna
turn
it
into
a
sports
bar,
would
they
have
to
go
back
before
the
City
Council
for
any
other
type
of
permit,
not.
M
B
M
B
N
I
B
F
B
B
I
P
B
P
B
G
B
I
have
amended
motion
by
mr.
stone
Berger
second
by
mr.
Arland
I.
Think
that's
a
fair
thing,
since
we
are
in
the
Gateway
overlay
district,
where
we've
always
been
more
careful
in
that
district,
and
this
is
the
first
beer
wine
alcohol
we've
put
in
there
and
I
do
think.
It
sets
a
little
bit
of
a
precedence
that
when
we
see
the
wide
variety
of
this
that
we,
if
the
usage
of
the
building
changes
in
those
spots,
then
they'll
have
to
come
back
before
and
tell
us
what
they're
doing
Toolbar
or
put
a
restaurant
in
there.
B
B
M
B
I
think
we
can
pursue.
You
might
not
tweak
that
ordinance
a
little
bit
that
gives
us
the
leeway
to
to
reconsider
the
conditional
use
if
the
usage
changes
you
know
right
now.
Beer
wine
is
pretty
broad
usage,
it's
detailed
down
a
little
more,
so
I
think
it's
gives
us
a
chance
to
relook
at
something.
If
you
know
we
approve
it
based
on
a
nail
salon
and
because.
I
I
never
understood
it
that
way,
the
one
up
on
1st
Avenue
north
west
of
the
guest
house
salon
that
went
in
there.
You
know
that
was
a
served
wine
just
like
you're
saying,
but
that
could
turn
into
something
a
whole
lot
more
than
what
we
thought.
We
were
approving
that
night.
I
didn't
realize
that,
but.