![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/E8q5-5UxFUM/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: BOA Meeting 12 08 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
You
first
first
item
on
the
agenda:
is
the
approval
of
the
November
10th
2016
minutes
gonna
get
a
motion
in
a
second
I'll
make
a
motion
motion
by
mr.
Guerra
second
by
mr.
Hanson
on
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
item
number
2
is
applicants
Michael
and
Angela
beavers
permit
number
171,
37
or
peeling
zoning
ordered
seeking
a
variance
for
a
garage
unattached
garage
in
our
one
single-family
district
at
1101,
Skyline
Drive,
correct.
B
This
particular
application
has
come
before
the
board
and
2011
application
was
made
for
this
garage
14
foot
setback
and
was
denied
in
2014
this
same
application.
Similar
application
came
back
for
a
15
foot
setback
and
was
denied,
and
now
their
goodness
again
before
you.
There
is
sufficient
buildable
area
on
this
21,000
30
square
for
a
lot
to
construct
a
compliant
garage
of
equal
or
greater
area,
without
variance
in
addition
to
the
nine
compliant
setback.
18
feet
is
not
also
not
sufficient
off
street
parking
lengths
in
front
of
a
proposed
garage
as
any
vehicle
park.
C
And
I
told
Ken
originally
I
was
against
this
and
I
just
met
with
Mike
and
the
reason
I
was
against.
It
would
have
more
to
do
with
landscaping
and
so
on,
because
the
last
several
years
we've
lost
some
trees
and
so
on.
So
it
kind
of
opened
it
up.
So
I
thought
was
this:
it
was
going
to
change
how
it
would
look
down
there
and
everything,
but
talking
with
Mike
and
so
on.
I've
changed
my
mind.
I
feel
comfortable
with
what
he
has
in
mind
to
do.
C
D
C
E
Are
the
ones
that
are
requesting
the
variants
on
the
setback
of
the
property
lines
when
we
applied
last,
we
and
at
that
time
the
board
had
a
split
decision.
Do
they
the
fact
that
they
did
extend
the
sidewalk
up
from
the
west
to
the
east,
up
the
hill
that
that
there
wouldn't
have
been
enough
space
for
a
full-sized
vehicle
to
park
between
the
front
face
of
the
garage
and
the
sidewalk
and
I
believe
it
was
the
board's
recommendation
at
that
time
to
do
the
the
18
foot
variance
on
the
setback?
E
E
We
have
moved
it
back,
18
18
feet
to
what
it
was
recommended
and
as
as
Don
mentioned,
we'd
prefer
not
to
move
it
any
further
back
into
our
property
due
the
fact
that
there
is
a
nice
tree
there,
that's
not
only
visually
aesthetic
for
ourselves,
but
for
many
of
our
neighbors
I'm.
Referring
to
is
this
one
right
here,
you
know
it's
visually
I,
think
it's
that
aesthetic
for
us
and
for
in
for
Don
and.
H
A
H
A
B
E
E
A
E
E
E
Then
it's
not
the
original
proposal.
A
few
years
back
was
in
line.
It
was
the
15
feet.
This
would
actually
be
three
feet:
setback
to
the
north
farther
due
the
fact
that
the
board's
recommendation
I
believe
at
that
time
was
for
18
feet
if
they
ever
did
extend
the
sidewalk
from
the
Hogs
up
through
here,
which
and.
E
E
B
J
A
Most
big
pickups
nowadays
like
22,
aren't
they
Ken
Yeah
right.
Anyone
else's
speak
in
public,
see
now
I'll
close.
The
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
further
discussion,
some
of
motion
by
mr.
Albertson
second
by
mr.
McGuire
discussion.
Any
want
to
have
any
questions
like
I
said:
I
went
up
and
took
a
look
at
it
and
I
do
see
why
the
neighbors
would
prefer
not
to
look
out
the
window
and
see
a
garage
if
they
could
see
no
discussion
last
for
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
all.
B
A
C
A
B
Again,
application
was
submitted
requesting
to
construct
a
non-conforming
12,000
square
foot
60
by
200
foot
commercial
building.
On
the
sixty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
square
foot
parcel
located
in
the
c3
highway
commercial
district
says,
structure
proposed
to
be
constructed
zero
feet
from
the
West
property
line
where
a
minimum
of
40
feet
setback
is
required
also
without
Boulevard
improvements
for
a
minimum
of
15
feet
of
grasps
Boulevard
area,
the
one
tree
per
50
foot
of
frontage
is
required.
B
In
August,
2016
spice
correlation
successfully
petitioned
to
vacate
the
West
portion
of
the
10th
Avenue
south
public
right
away,
the
lies
between
block
2
of
Paulson's
additions
in
black
2
of
the
south
side.
Addition,
these
spies
corporation
properties,
gain
nine
thousand
nine
hundred
nine
thousand
nine
square
feet,
6565
a
buildable
area
of
at
the
vacation
of
the
right
away.
Currently,
in
non-conforming,
three
thousand
seven
sixty
seven
square
foot
office
building
exists
on
the
north
side
of
the
property.
B
This
structure
there's
now
approximately
twenty
nine
thousand
four
in
72
square
feet
of
compliant
buildable
area
available
on
this
property
within
the
structure
district.
If
application
is
endorsed,
this
board
has
the
authority
required
fulfillment
of
any
of
Awlaki
boulevard
infrastructure
require
missing
injection
with
any
structural
improvements
authorized
by
a
building
permit.
B
B
A
B
A
B
So
you
can
see
the
red
area
here
within
the
floodplain,
as
this
is
a
non
residential
construction.
They
have
the
option
of
either
build
nests
at
whatever
weather
the
finished
floor
is
in
or
out
of
it
they
can
do
flood
proof,
construction
or
flood
resistant
construction
that
has
to
be
certified
by
an
engineer
they
do
or
they
have
the
option
of
elevating
it
to
above
the
base
flood
elevation,
which
they
may
want
to
do
anyway,
because
this
end
is
are
already
out,
even
if
they
just
run
that
flat
level
more
than
likely.
B
A
That's
a
question
I
had,
is
you
know
when
I
looked
at
the
layout
of
it,
I
went
well,
the
doors
are
gonna
face,
Third
Street,
so
my
my
thought
was
is
if
anytime,
somebody's
gonna
back
in
or
out
of
there
they're
gonna
back
across
the
public
right
away,
they
stop
to
take
anything
in
or
out
of
there
that
actually
be
parked
on
the
street.
How
was
that
that's
gravel
right.
A
B
B
A
D
The
discussions
at
both
the
Planning
Commission
level
and
the
city
council
level
during
the
there
was
two
separate
vacations
of
10th
Avenue
South
and
through
each
of
those
processes
we
stressed
that
it's
the
intention
of
the
city
to
have
third
Street
southeast,
develop
south
of
212
and
become
part
of
the
corridor
that
reaches
down
to
that
current
development
of
the
theater
area
and
I.
Guess
Pete
can
put
my
screen
up
a
minute
because
I
have
a
larger
picture
out
here.
D
So
3rd
Street
is,
is
this
piece
north
and
south,
and
the
development
is
currently
down
here?
It's
the
south,
the
bottom
of
my
screen,
3rd
Street,
would
be
extended
all
the
way
down
to
or
near
that
intersection
and
then
4th
Street
would
would
also
be
developed.
Eventually,
you
know
what
the
anticipation
that
the
cement
plant
some
day
may
not
be
there,
and
11th
Street
will
be
the
main
connector
back
out
onto
highway
81,
so
encroaching
in
this
right
away
or
near
this
right.
D
11Th
Avenue
excuse
me
yep
11th,
Avenue,
so
encroaching
in
this
third
Street
against
that
right
away,
may
compromise
the
future
use
or
intended
use
for
traffic
traveling
through
there.
I
I
have
apprehensions
of
doing
a
zero
setback
alone
that
we
do
have
other
storage
units
in
the
community
that
were
built
similarly,
but
they
come
with
headaches,
and
you
know
problems.
A
K
A
On
two-thirds
kind
of
what
I
was
gonna,
I
was
gonna,
have
him
zoom
in
and
show
that
because
I
looked
at
that
too
and
I
don't
know
if
those
other
units
have
doors
facing
third,
but
that
one
right
by
your
your
left
in
up
one
building
that
one
there?
Probably
it's
not
on
third,
but
it's
a
different
Street
there,
but
those
probably
are
opening
up
onto
a
zero
setback,
but
all
the
other
one,
the
ones
probably
dunno.
Well,
both
of
those
do
that
one
to
the
south
and
the
one
to
the
north.
A
A
K
A
A
A
Yeah,
that's
that's!
That's
the
angle
that
I
was
I,
think
Shane
you're!
Okay
with
you
know,
possibly
because
there's
a
future
Street
there.
If
that
buildings,
20
foot
back,
then
there's
not
quite
as
much
of
an
encroachment
routine
encroachment
on
to
that
city
right
away
with
vehicles
coming
and
going.
D
Well,
you
know
we
haven't
had
the
request
yet
either
but
I'm,
assuming
that
there
will
be
a
request
for
a
continuous
driveway
through
that,
and
we
wouldn't
support
that
either
I
mean
there's,
there
needs
to
be
some
limited
access
with
anticipation
of
other
parking,
or
you
know,
traffic
patterns
and
and
so
forth
through
there.
So
twenty
feet
or
more
of
a
setback
is
certainly
I.
D
Would
twenty
feet
might
be
reasonable,
but
you
know
he
has
105
feet
remaining
in
the
rest
of
the
lot
if
he
gets
the
zero
setback
so
I
don't
know
how
that
would
compromise
using
it
if
you've
moved
it
even
closer
to
the
forty,
but
you
know:
you're
gonna
have
equal
space
on
either
side
of
the
building.
Then.
J
A
A
A
A
A
G
A
D
A
D
Trees
and
green
space
and
with
the
think
of
this
to
this
particular
region,
is
right,
now
storage
units,
but
the
next
two
blocks
to
the
south,
maybe
some
other
commercial
use
other
than
this
and
down
there.
We're
gonna
want
to
go
back
to
your
40
foot,
setbacks
similar
to
other
areas
of
town,
so
I,
don't
know
that
I
I
mean
I
can't
say
that
it's
gonna
change
use
but
I
got
anticipate.
There's
gonna
be
at
least
one
business
to
the
south.
I
K
K
F
D
Because
there
have
multiple
driveway
or
you
know
all
that
whole
frontages
garage
doors
so
think
about
how
you
pull
into
or
out
over
utilized
a
garage
door.
It
takes
you
a
solid
20
feet
of
straight
maneuverability
to
even
back
in
to
or
pull
out
of
one.
So
the
closer
you
get
to
the
right
away
line
the
more
you're
going
to
compromise
traffic
on
the
street
to
get
in
and
out
of
those
units.
D
So
that's
part
of
my
concern
and
then,
like
you,
said,
going
south
of
there.
If
we're
going
to
have
a
building
with
a
40
foot
setback
to
accommodate
parking
for
something
else,
you
know
a
boutique
or
an
insurance
agent
or
real
estate
agent
I'll,
throw
them
all
out
there.
So
you
know
that's
what
we're
gonna
ask
for
south
of
there
is
the
40
foot
frontage,
and
so
that's
where
our
standard
lies.
D
A
One
more
question
this
for
Shane
and
Ken,
and
it's
a
little
a
little
oh
go
ahead.
Oh
no!
No!
This
is
a
flood
question
because
I'm
going
back
to
that
floodplain
and
it's
just
so
something
that
I've
seen
happen
a
lot
recently
and
it's
that,
if
a
person
intention
is
to
build
the
property
up
to
get
it
out
of
the
floodplain
or
out
of
above
the
base
flood
elevation.
A
D
D
A
The
city
could
build
the
road,
the
road
lower
than
the
flood
elevation,
but
the
property
owner
if
he
wants
to
get
that
special
letter
from
FEMA
that
excludes
his
property
from
the
flood
requirement
for
flood
insurance
and
makes
it
cheaper.
If
you
buy
it,
it's
going
to
have
to
have
20
feet
of
ground
on
each
side
of
that
building.
That's
above
the.
D
D
A
K
L
K
K
A
K
D
So
at
a
minimum,
I
mean
and
I
can't
say
that
I
mean
we
started
to
say
never
because
we
don't
know
you
know.
Spice
could
sell
this
to
somebody
else
that
ultimately
would
find
a
way
to
make
it
an
economical
to
to
develop
it.
But
at
a
minimum,
I
would
expect
3rd
Street
to
continue
down
to
the
intersection
of
11th
Avenue
and
make
that
the
loop
and
then
correct.
D
Okay,
I
just
turned
the
contours
on,
and
these
are
two
foot
contours,
so
you
can
see
that
it's
relatively
flat
because
there
aren't
more
than
one
or
two
contours
in
the
whole
area.
So
I
would
agree
that
generally
it
drops
off.
But
by
how
much
it's
certainly
less
than
it's
five
feet
or
less,
because
there
aren't
more
than
two
lines
in
there
so
but,
like
I
said
it
would
be
challenging.
But
we've
seen
other
requests
come
through.
D
That
would
change
a
site
like
this
I
I
would
presume
just
frame
of
reference
and,
of
course,
I'm
a
short-timer
in
this
community.
But
I
would
guess
that
this
whole
area
that
the
theater
sat
on
events
at
one
time
was
lower
and
got
built
up
with
fill
as
well,
so
I
mean.
So
it's
it's
not
ideal,
but
it's
possible.