►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 01 04 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
And
thirdly,
the
mayor
will
not
be
here
tonight
he's
gone
on
personal
business,
so
he
won't
be
able
to
bog
us
down
so
we'll
get
right
along
here
and
and
we'll
get
business
done
so
we'd
like
to
call
the
meeting
to
order,
and
tonight
we
welcome
father
Michael
when
seen
from
Holy
Name
Catholic
Church.
That
will
lead
us
in
prayer.
B
B
Well,
Lord,
as
we
turn
the
page
on
the
new
calendar
year
of
two
zero
one:
six
in
a
community
Watertown,
South
Dakota,
a
new
time
of
life,
growth
and
peace
bless.
Our
new
time
bless
our
calendars,
our
holy
days
and
holidays,
our
feasts
and
fasts.
Our
birthdays
anniversaries
and
all
special
days
of
remembering
in
the
new
year
bless
our
instruments
of
time
as
well
from
our
iPhones
to
big
grandfather
clocks,
whose
chimes
make
the
passage
of
time
more
pleasant
and
he
ever
faithful,
even
if
old-fashioned
wristwatches
bless.
B
The
chimes
and
bells
of
church
tops
to
tell
us
to
pause
for
prayer
for
prayer,
each
noon
and
call
us
to
worship
each
Sunday.
And
finally,
we
bless
the
Lord
for
whom
time
is
not,
but
yet
yet
made.
Each
time
important
as
we
proclaim
with
the
psalmist's
and
1:06.
Give
thanks
to
the
Lord
for
the
Lord
is
good
for
his
kindness,
endures,
forever,
amen.
D
E
F
C
F
A
A
A
The
third
item
is
the
application
for
a
new
retail
on
off
sale,
malt
beverage
license
to
prayer,
wins
Golf,
LLC,
doing
business
as
Prairie
winds
on
Kemp
at
eat
at
11,
East
Kemp?
The
first
item
will
will
be
the
public
hearing
so
we'll
open
that
public
hearing.
This
is
the
time
in
the
place
for
anyone
speaking
in
favor
against
this
item.
Is
there
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
hearing?
None
we'll
close.
The
public
hearing
like
to
have
a
motion
for
discussion
have
a
motion
by.
G
A
H
C
A
A
And
so
the
mayor
felt
that
it
is
best
for
us
to
put
a
moratorium
on
them
and
and
then
convene
a
group
of
people
to
reassess
history
on
this.
And
in
regards
to
that,
the
the
intention
is
a
sign
ordinance,
the
current
language
of
the
sign
ordinance
and
where
we
were
at
in
Erie.
In
regards
to
the
creation
of
the
overlay
district.
Now
the
moratorium
can
last
up
to
a
year
and
I
believe
that's
what
it
does
state
on
the
document.
A
But
it
would
be
the
mayor's
intention
and
should
be
our
intention
to
get
this
thing
addressed
in
as
short
a
period
as
what
we
can,
and
so
we
would.
We
would
certainly
ask
and
want
the
mayor
to
put
a
high
priority
on
it,
so
we
get
this
thing
done
and
resolved,
and
then
we
move.
We
know
where
we're
at
and
everybody
moves
forward,
and
we
certainly
know
that
this
impacts
individuals
that
are
in
this
business,
and
so
we
want
to
get.
I
Approach
explain
the
main
reason
his
concern
was
billboards:
that's
the
term
that
he
used
and
my
understanding
when
they,
when
they
talk
about
billboards,
which
there
really
is
not
to
find
in
our
sign
ordinance
as
billboards
they're
talking
about
signs
that
are
288
square
feet
and
up
okay.
What
we're
doing
with
this,
if
we
decided
to
do
this
is
basically
shutting
off
any
opportunity
for
off-premise
signs
in
the
whole
community
that
might
be
smaller
than
that.
I
believe
that
the
concern
was
for
the
larger,
but.
I
Was
a
great
big
sign
with
the
wood
frame
on
the
back
that
kind
of
thing
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
be
careful
with
this
now
I
got
to
say
I'm
in
the
sign
industry,
but
I'm
saying
this
because
I
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
them
prior
than
I
did
prior
to
now
and
the
industry
itself,
but
also
I,
think
the
mayor
had
mentioned
that
he
was
concerned
about
the
gateway
overlay
district.
That
was
the
main
concern.
I
The
the
Gateway
over
overlay
district
is
currently
completely
saturated.
If
you're,
just
looking
at
a
billboard
type
sign
or
a
sign
of
over
288
square
feet,
there
really
is
no
opportunity
there.
At
this
point
in
time,
First
Avenue,
we've
already
said:
First
Avenue
cannot
have
billboards
if
you
want
to
call
them
billboards
more
signs
of
that
size.
I
So,
if
we're
going
to
do
this,
I
would
suggest
that
we
localize
this
to
the
gateway
overlay
district,
and
if
we
can't
do
that,
then
I
would
say
that
we
not
put
this
I
wouldn't
say,
set
this
up
as
all
off
premise:
advertising
all
off
premise
signs
I,
would
say
anything
that
is
larger
than
244
square
feet.
That's
my
opinion,
because
we
do
have
people
in
this
community
that
rely
on.
I
They
have
jobs,
and
there
are
companies
in
this,
the
community,
obviously
that
manufacture
signs
and
that
would
basically
shut
off
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
them
for
smaller
signs,
underneath
that
244
square
foot
size,
so
I
think
we
really
need
to
consider
that
before
we
just
go
ahead
and
make
an
all-out
moratorium
across
the
town-
and
we
really
don't
know
how
long
it's
going
to
take.
It
took
18
months
last
time
when
we
did
that
sign,
ordinance
and
I
was
a
part
of
that
group.
I
K
A
I
A
The
mayor
put
that
on
there
and
then
with
every
intention
of
getting
this
thing
done
in
the
most
expedient
manner.
Bruce
you'd
mentioned
that
to
put
a
30
or
60
day
time
frame
on
that,
that's
probably
it's
really
is
an
issue
with
the
mayor,
as
the
mayor
is
the
one
that
would
be
the
one
to
convene
a
committee
and
if
it
involves
staff,
he
is
the
one
at
direct
staff.
So
this
body
here
tonight,
I,
don't
believe,
can
really
make
that
commitment
for
his
his
staff.
A
I
think
you
know
not
knowing
everything
that
he
or
they
have
on
their
plates.
I
think
we
just
need
to
to
trust
that
we
can
get
this
thing
done
in
a
relatively
short
period
of
time,
without
specifically
defining
that
and
that
we
need
to
and
NC
and,
like
John
said,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we
we
get
these
things
that
we
know
exactly
where
they
can
go
today
and
that
we
get
them
in
the
right
place,
because
once
they're
there
they're
there
we're
gonna
live
with
them
forever.
M
Advertising
is
just
to
find
us
off
premises,
advertising
just
to
maybe
clarify
what
this.
What
this
thing
is
is
it's
that's
I
can't
receive
any
applications
and
approve
an
application,
so
your
temporary
off
premises,
advertising
which
you'll
see
use
sometimes
I,
don't
get
an
application
for
that,
so
that
stuff
could
still
go
up.
You
know
election
signs,
things
like
that.
M
M
On
wheels
on
carts
those
those
are
not
affected
by
this
yep,
that
is,
it's
actually
a
whole
separate
piece
of
the
ordinance.
This
is
just
your
permanent
off-premise
advertising,
which
they've
commonly
referred
to
as
billboards
is
what
this
affects,
so
that
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
a
little
bit
so
everybody
knows
and
and
the
one
year
is,
you
were
correct.
That
is
how
it
works.
M
M
We
could
maybe
get
some
language
put
together
fairly
quickly,
but
by
the
time
we
get
meet
our
deadlines
for
Planning,
Commission
and
City
Council
for
seconds
those
kind
of
things
I
mean
you're
talking
probably
six
weeks
is
the
minimum
amount
of
time.
If
we
had
something
an
idea,
what
we
want
it
to
say
right
now,
so
just
that's
the
other
part
I
want
to
clarify
so.
I
A
M
F
M
To
clarify
another
thing,
too,
is
the
existing
billboards.
This
really
doesn't
affect
them
unless
some
sort
of
catastrophic
event
comes
through,
like
we
had
a
couple
years
ago
where
wind
came
through
and
knocked,
and
then
we
had
another
one
that
had
to
go
be
redirected
because
of
it
was
a
right
away
issue
but
as
far
as
then
want
to
change
a
face,
sell
advertising.
It
doesn't
affect
that
at
all
because
face
changes
are
not
do
not
require
them
to
come
and
see
me
or
Ken,
it's
just
any
new
or
reconstructed.
M
Billboards
is
the
only
thing
this
really
affects,
so
you
know,
for
instance,
if
somebody
buys
parcel
property
takes
it
down,
because
it's
in
the
way
and
they
want
to
put
it
up
in
another
spot.
They
could
not
do
that
during
this
moratorium
until
we
decide
what
we
want
that
to
be
or
snowstorm
piles
up
and
knocks
it
over
something
to
that
effect,
then
you
know
maybe
that's
something
we
look
at
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
If
something
like
that
happens,
maybe
we
can
look
at
it
at
that
point.
H
M
It
would
probably
you
know:
legal
council
would
be
better,
but
it
would
probably
require
a
lift
temporary
lifting
of
the
moratorium.
You
know,
because
even
the
Planning
Commission
can't
override
a
moratorium
without
you
guys
lifting
it
so
I
believe
I
shouldn't
speaking
I,
believe
that's
how
it
works,
but
I
mean
it
can
be
done
if
it,
if
that,
if
it
comes
that,
hopefully
we'll
have
something
resolved
before
we
ever
get.
To
that
point,
I
mean
I.
Think
the
mayor
has
everything
from
him.
M
E
Is
this
someone
come
out
of
that
your
goal
meeting
that
we
had
dealing
with
other
signage,
and
we
had
this
discussion
about
issues
and
different
areas
and
some
of
them
being
currently
being
pretty
close?
We
don't
want
to
have
those
things
come
up
in
the
future
to
two
right
away
and
whatnot,
so
that
was
discussed
practically
a
year
ago.
I,
don't
remember
what
the
timeframe
was.
Not
everybody
was
before
the
last
election.
F
G
N
I
guess
one
of
the
there's
a
couple
concerns
that
we
have
as
a
company.
That's
a
lot
of
our
you
know.
This
is
a
big
chunk
of
our
operation.
Here
is
is
off-premise
science.
So
a
couple
of
things
that
that
jump
out
and
kind
of
freak
me
out
a
little
bit
is
one
is
the
timeframe.
You
know
if
we're
talking
about
a
two-month,
maybe
three
months
of
evaluating
this
and
coming
up
with
a
better
plan.
N
I
think
that
we
could
probably
all
agree
that
we
could
live
with
that,
but,
as
somebody
stated,
I
think
it
was
Bruce
that
the
last
the
last
time
we
worked
on
the
really
worked
on
the
site.
Lawrence
was
18
months.
So
that's
that's.
That
scares
me
a
little
bit
for
a
couple
reasons,
one
being
that
at
any
given
time
for
our
company
in
particular,
we've
got
these
off-premise
signs.
N
You
know
in
an
area,
that's
gonna
have
a
lot
of.
Hopefully
it's
gonna
have
a
lot
of
building
going
on
soon
right.
You
know
right
out
there
on
on
East,
highway,
212
in
in
and
near
that
bypass.
So
what
happens
is
if
we
are
some
of
that
land
gets
sold
and
we
are
forced
to
try
and
find
a
new
location
for
a
billboard
that
houses
multiple
advertisers,
we're
just
we're
just
out
of
luck.
You
know
so
that
not
only
are
we
out
of
luck,
but
the
the
advertisers
that
utilize,
our
billboard
are.
N
N
In
some
cases,
some
might
have
to
go
away
because
there's
nowhere
for
them
to
go,
but
in
a
situation
like
that,
if
we
haven't
resolved
this
by
then
I
need
a
permit
to
move
a
billboard.
Eight
feet:
it's
a
corrective
yeah.
Okay,
so,
for
example,
you
know
we
have
a
billboard
on
212,
that's
gonna,
be
in
that
zone.
That's
gonna
be
reconstructed.
If
that
right-of-way
bumps
into
our
board,
we
can
potentially
we
can
move
that
so
it's
out
of
the
right
away,
but
with
this
moratorium
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
this.
K
A
A
A
G
A
Can't
make
that
commitment
for
the
mayor
here
because
I
don't
I,
don't
direct
in
schedule
staff.
So
you
know
it
was
drafted
and
represented
here
by
the
mayor
as
as
the
one
year,
but
I
will
tell
you
that
he
and
I
have
had
several
conversations
about
it
and
there's
no
intention
of
this
thing
even
last
anything
close
to
a
year.
Okay,.
M
A
You
know,
and
then
so
maybe
what
we
can
do
is
is
for
our
purposes
here
tonight
is
we
need
to
act
on
on
the
request.
The
resolution
that's
in
front
of
us,
you
know
with
the
maximum
of
the
year,
but
I,
don't
think.
There's
anybody
up
here.
That
has
any
desire
for
this
thing
to
go
on
here.
This
is
something
that
has
been
kicked
around
I've
been
on
the
council
for
a
little
over
four
years.
A
It's
just
always
been
a
lingering
issue
for
us
and,
like
Tim,
said
a
you
know.
Year
ago
we
had
something
that
was
up
here.
Well,
we've
had
these
discussions,
it
seems
like
they
come
up
periodically
and
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
we
need
to
just
take
a
look
at
this
thing.
I,
don't
want
something
I'll
call
it
a
once
and
for
all
basis
and
clearly
understand:
where
could
they
go
today?
In
the
city
of
Watertown,
under
the
under
the
current
ordinance
requirements,
so
we
understand
what
what
the
today's
opportunities
look
like.
A
You
know
and
then,
as
our
community
grows,
we
had
to
look
at
it
and
and
potentially
make
changes.
Whether
that's
opening
or
tightening
the
sign
ordinance.
But
I
I
am
not
in
favor
of
isolating
the
moratorium
simply
to
the
212
area
out
by
the
gateway
district.
I.
Don't
think
that's
fair
to
to
put
a
moratorium
solely
on
that
ownership.
Group
I
think
that
would
be
inappropriate
for
us
to
do
that.
I.
N
K
E
K
Unknown
are
where
they're
gonna
pop
up.
You
know,
that's
that's
the
biggest
thing
is
you
know
we
had
one
couple
of
them
pop
up
in
the
center
of
town
there
and
until
we
figure
out
exactly
where
we
can
put
them
and
where
we
don't
want
them
and
where
they're
appropriate,
that's
probably
the
biggest
unknown,
because.
M
We
have
the
right
as
staff
to
refer
anything
to
plan
commission
any
application
whatever
under
21
but
legally.
If
we
denied
it
and
it
met
all
of
our
standards,
I
think
we
could
definitely
open
ourselves
up
to
litigation
because
you
didn't
really
give
you
know.
We
don't
have
sound
reasoning.
We
just
don't
think
it
fits
there
while
you're,
and
it
says
it
does
so.
You
know
I
think
we
could
definitely
open
ourselves
up
I,
just
to
clarify
these.
What
these
are
is
all
the
billboards
within
the
city
proper
Watertown.
Those
circles
represent
the
500-foot
radius.
M
They
have
to
be
so
essentially
where
the
500-foot
from
the
center
to
the
outside
of
the
line.
So
wherever
there's
a
gap
between
circles
is
where
there's
availability
for
signage
and
off-premise
advertising.
A
premise:
advertising
is
loud
in
any
c1
c3
and
any
of
the
I
industrial
zone
locations
within
the
city
water
tone.
It
doesn't
say
anything
whether
it's
on
two
1281
highway,
20
middle
of
town,
whatever
that's
that's
the
only
way.
That's
when
it's
reads
presently.
So
that's
why
you
see
some
of
these
scattered
about
on
the.
M
A
One
of
the
problems
we
have
is
we
don't
define
billboard.
You
know,
let's
be
honest
if
you're
talking
about
putting
up
a
sign
and
it's
a
six
by
six
sign
and
it's
off
premise:
I
knees
on
a
post,
I'm,
probably
less
concerned
with
it.
That
I
am
a
sign
us
up
to
288
square
feet
with
a
four
foot.
Diameter
pole
and
you
know
some
massive
structure
up
there.
That's
I
am
a
much
much
more
concerned
with
that
and
where
that
might
go.
Where
are
the
right
places
for
those
things?
A
A
But
we
need
to
do
it
right
and
I
think
that
I
think
our
first
step
must
be
to
define
Billboard
and
then
go
from
there,
because
that's
really
what
we're
talking
about
here.
We're
really
not
talking
about
all
the
other
acid
there's
many
different
kinds
of
off-premise
signage,
we're
not
talking
about
those
we
really
are
talking
about
in
our
own
minds.
I
G
I
was
just
gonna,
say:
I,
don't
disagree
with
you.
It
sounds
as
though
there's
some
clarity
that
needs
to
be
made
in
the
sign
code
and
I'm
all
for
that
and
would
be
happy
to
be
involved
with
any
discussions
as
a
representative
from
our
company,
at
least
for
for
contributions,
I
guess
one.
One
final
comment
that
I
would
like
to
make,
at
least
from
from
our
company's
perspective,
is
that
you
know:
there's
really,
there's
really
no
other
business.
That
I
can
think
of
that.
G
If
you
were
to
put
a
moratorium
on,
say,
alcohol
sales,
or
you
know,
seals
and
gutters
and
a
fascia
I
mean
this.
This
is
impacting
our
business
you're,
not
allowing
our
business
to
to
put
any
more
billboards
up
as
a
as
a
revenue
source
and,
if
you
think
of
any
other
business
that
that's
as
a
revenue
source,
that's
ultimately
impacting
you
know
the
company
and
the
employees
that
work
for
it
and
I
feel
as
though
you
can
sort
out
the
sign
code,
you
can
sort
out
the
locations
on
where
you're
going
to
allow
billboards.
M
I've
been
here
since
April
of
13
and
I've
issued
one
billboard,
off-premise
advertising
permit.
Since
I've
been
here,
they
erected
a
couple
that
were
permanent
just
before
I
started
that
there's
a
couple
places
in
town
but
I
bet
in
the
last
four
or
five
years.
We
maybe
had
four
or
five
of
them,
and
they
were.
There
was
one
company
put
a
three
and
another
one
put
up
one,
and
there
was
once
inside
business.
A
So
we're
not
we're
not
even
averaging
one
a
year
here
right
now
correct
right,
so
honestly,
I
find
it
hard
to
grasp
that
a
moratorium
of
a
period
of
time
that
we
can
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
commit
to
you
know
a
three
month
or
a
four
month
period,
especially
based
on
that
the
history
of
the
erection
of
these
things,
I
can't
believe.
That's
going
to
be
a
significant
bother
to
anybody.
Hey
am
I
wrong
in
that.
N
The
one
thing
that
would
kind
of
change
all
of
this
as
far
as
frequency
of
how
many
have
gone
up
in
the
last
year
or
two
years,
even
is
we
know
with
the
new
building
the
new
business
is
coming
in
on
East
212.
We've
got
several
billboards
that
we
know
we're
gonna
either
need
to
replace-
and
that's
that's
soon,
that's
coming
so
we
know
that
we
either
need
to
replace
them,
or
we
have
to
deal
with
the
loss
of
that
the
loss
of
that
revenue,
the
loss
of
that
potential
for
our
advertisers.
N
So
that's
what
makes
it
a
little
bit
different
than
the
last
year.
I
was
told
within
this
last
two
weeks
that
it
looks
like
a
set
of
those
billboards
that
we
have
out
on
he's
to
12,
thereby
the
bypass
that
could
be
going
away.
Really
quick
leaves
me
with
for
advertisers
that
are
going
to
be
without
without.
A
You
know
I
in
here's
where
I
haven't
had
time
to
work
on.
This
was
part
of
where
I
need
to
get
my
mind
on
this
thing,
but
as
I
go
back
to
the
development
of
that
area
and
going
way
back
to
the
Gateway
district,
all
the
work
that
was
put
into
that
it
was
my
understanding
that,
as
soon
as
those
Lots
started
to
sell
out
there
and
were
developed
if
a
lot
was
sold-
and
there
was
a
billboard
on
it
that
that
billboard
could
no
longer
exist
and
be
placed
on
that.
A
A
M
Haven't
been
able
to
find
anything
within,
writing
I
think
that
was
what
was
portrayed
and
what
was
maybe
I,
don't
want
to
say,
sold,
but
I
think
is
what
was
was
given
to
you
and
reasoning,
giving
to
you
at
the
time.
Looking
back
and
what,
in
the
master
development
agreement
in
that
area,
there's
no
language
within
there
stating
that
they
have
to
go
away.
M
The
only
one
that
has
to
go
away
that
is
in
writing
is
the
one
that's
directly
adjacent
to
the
first
Avenue
Willow
Creek
Drive,
highway,
d1
intersection
to
the
east,
because
that
sign
was
put
there
by
conditional
use
because
it's
too
close
to
another
one.
It
wasn't
that
right
away
got
moved
over
had
a
five
year
sunset
that
five
year
sunset
was
extended
to
the
end
of
next
calendar
year
of
seventeen.
M
A
Well,
like
I,
said,
I
am
very
comfortable
in
what
I
was
told
in
what
I
understand
in
regards
to
the
Gateway.
Now,
whether
it's
not
in
writing
or
whatever
or
if
it
ended
up
not
being
documented
I,
do
know
that
specifically
with
one
of
the
Lando's
I
talked
to
them,
and
and
he
knew
clearly,
he
knew
clearly
that
when
that
land
sold
the
the
Billboard
was
going
away,
and
that
was
not
an
issue.
He
says
I
understand
that
and.
M
A
I
am
thinking
we
need
to
do.
We
need
to
pause
and
go
figure
out
what
what
truly
was
intended
and
discussed
and
and
and
I'll
say
agreed
to
whatever,
because
here
we
have
a
landowner
that
has
that
was
a
part
of
this
Gateway
development
that
understands
it
and
that's
not
the
same
one.
That
I
had
a
discussion
with
so
now
when
you
got
to
landowners
that
have
that
same
understanding.
A
L
N
N
The
issue
with
that
is
there's
no
way
to
once
you
put
that
in
the
ground.
You
don't
get
to
reuse
that
so
it's
a
it's
very
cost
prohibitive
to
just
go
up
and
put
billboards
up
willy-nilly
that,
once
that's
put
in
the
ground,
you've
got
12
to
15
feet
of
your
structure
buried
in
the
ground.
There's
just
really
no
reusing
that
I.
N
L
L
L
A
D
L
E
O
A
Think
mayor
has
appointed
yet
because
the
resolution
passed.
What
he
has
said
is
that,
as
a
state
earlier
is
that
he
needs
to
to
convene
a
body
of
people
to
get
this
thing
looked
at
and
to
look
at
the
historical
aspects
and
also
look
at
you
know
once
we
understand
that,
because
that
really
really
is
pertinent
to
the
to
the
Gateway
district
and
then
figure
out.
Are
there
other
areas
that
we
you
know?
F
I
This
to
the
council
would
would
it
make
sense
to
if
we,
if
there
is
a
desire,
a
strong
desire
to
to
have
this
moratorium
in
place?
Would
it
make
sense
for
us
to
wait
until
the
mayor
has
a
body
in
place
and
gets
this
started
before
we
put
the
moratorium
in
that
way?
We're
not
waiting.
Two
months
before
we
finally
get
a
group
together.
No.
K
He
can
put
a
group
together,
we
put
the
moratorium
in
that'll,
give
you
an
authorization
to
put
a
body
together
and
then
go
about
the
business.
The
minute
you
if
we
don't
put
a
moratorium
and
they're
gonna,
have
about
15
applications
for
billboards
on
their
desk
tomorrow.
To
put
them
up,
you
know,
I
know.
A
And
that's
exactly
my
point,
though
Bruce
is
how
many
have
we
built
in
the
last
number
of
years
and
I.
Just
don't
see
a
three
or
four
month
period
really
haven't
that
great
of
effect,
because
if
it
doesn't
change,
then
the
the
area
out
on
east
to
12
isn't
adversely
affected
in
regards
to
its
possibility
for
signage
there
Chris.
F
N
A
C
C
And
you're
asking
me
what
normal
is
so
I,
probably
can't
do
that
I
guess
to
give
the
most
flexibility
to
not
have
to
continue
to
come
back
and
address
this.
The
up
to
one
year
or
until
you
get
it
settled
is
is
probably
the
all-encompassing
way
to
just
address
it
once
get
it
done
and
come
back
and
lift
it.
If
there's
concerns
that
feet
are
gonna
get
dragged
and
it's
not
going
to,
then
then
you
probably
have
to
address
that
that
length
of
time
that's.
O
What
I'm
thinking
is
that
we
in
the
language
it
has
the
opportunity
for
us
to
lift
it
at
any
time,
and
so,
if
you
come
to
us
Stewart
and
say,
I
got
like
twelve
permits
here,
stacking
up
on
my
desk
and
you
guys
haven't
done
anything
yet
I.
Think
then
it
but
hooves
us
as
a
council
to
take
us
a
look
at
it
and
say:
do
we
need
to
change
this
so
I?
O
O
We're
not
getting
anywhere
we're
stalled,
but
I
really
do
think
that
it
is
time
to
take
a
breath
and
say
you
know:
where
do
we
want
these
to
go
because,
like
you
said
when
you
put
them
in
they're,
not
moving,
you
know
and
we've
got
such
a
huge
amount
of
potential
and
actual
development
going
on
there.
So
I
think
I.
Think
that's
my
understanding
as
I.
Listen
to
the
conversation
is
that
you
know
I
I,
understand
completely
where
you're
coming
from,
but
I
also
feel
as
a
council.
O
A
Stewart,
here's
here's
about
I'll,
commit
to
you
and
I'll
make
a
suggestion
that
is
for
Don
and
I
as
the
the
president
and
vice-president
Council
and
I.
Don't
think.
There's
anybody
on
this
council
that
wants
to
sing
to
drag
out.
This
kinda
has
been
a
pain
in
the
butt
for
a
lot
of
years.
So
let's
just
get
it
done
the
mayor
not
being
here
tonight.
A
We
will
communicate
to
the
mayor
this
council's
desire
to
get
this
thing
done
in
a
30
to
90
day
period
to
90
to
120
day
period,
we'll
try
to
work
with
him
and
get
a
commitment
that
is
going
to
be
much
much
shorter
than
the
year.
But
I
honestly
think.
If
we
said
six
months
tonight
more
than
it
could
be
six
months,
I
think
the
biggest
opportunity
for
us
to
get
this
into
a
shortest
period
of
time
is
for
us
to
sit
down
with
the
mayor
and
say:
let's
figure
out
a
schedule.
A
Let's
get
it
done
and
let's
make
it
as
short
as
possible
and
I
will
commit
to
you
Don.
If
you
would
join
me
that
will
sit
down
with
the
mayor
when
he
is
back
and
we
will
work
with
him
to
get
a
schedule
set
as
best
we
can,
and
so
it
was
a
little
past,
the
one-year
I
doubt
you
are
that
area
of
development
for
our
community
is
too
important
for
us.
For
this
thing
to
drag
on.
This
is
a
part
of
that
development,
good,
bad
or
other.
A
It
is,
you
know
it's
depending
on
what
side
of
the
fence
you're
on,
so
it
is
important
for
us
to
get
this
thing.
We've
been
working
in
this
for
the
development
of
that
that
whole
area
of
land
for
so
many
years
and
now
we've
got
a
lot
of
really
good
opportunities
that
are
coming.
Let's
we
just
don't
want
to
blow
it.
We
want
to
make
sure
we're
doing
the
right
thing
and
we
want
to
do
it
as
quickly
as
we
can
so
that
we
everybody
knows
where
we
stand.
A
A
Is
the
time
frames
from
it
and
we
will
see
what
we
can
do
to
get
the
most
expedient
type
of
of
work
done
on
this
and
again
I
wish
I
could
commit
to
you
in
a
specific
time
frame,
but
I
really
don't
believe
it's
unreasonable
for
it
to
be
90
to
120
days
and,
like
Chris,
said
I
think
he's,
even
if
it
was
six
months
so
I
know
I
think
six
months
it
does
it
shouldn't.
Take
us
that
long.
You
know,
we've
been
through
this
I
think.
N
A
G
A
A
You
know
I
think
you
know
if
you,
if
you
guys
have
something
specific,
you
know
the
best
way
to
do
it.
Let's
bring
it
forward.
Let's
sit
down,
take
a
look
at
it,
even
if
the
moratorium
is
in
place,
we're
not
we're
not
trying
to
impede
business
here.
That's
not
what
we're
trying
to
do
we're
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
that
this
really
is
a
part
of
the
image
of
Watertown
and
what
we
want
our
community
to
look
like.
A
There's
been
a
lot
of
time
and
a
lot
of
money,
a
lot
of
efforts
put
into
trying
to
beautify
our
community
and
make
it
you
know,
look
better
to
those
that
not
only
live
here,
but
that
that
come
here,
so
in
certainly
that
east
part
of
town
in
a
growth
area
commercially
is
this
is
very
important
to
us.
So
we
want
to
do
it
right,
I.
F
Would
strongly
encourage
you
if
you
do
have
any
opportunities
over
in
that
part
of
town
to
come
to
us
as
soon
as
you
can,
because
that
is
you
know.
That
is
an
important
part
of
your
business.
Your
business,
important
in
the
city
of
Watertown,
but
that'll
also
encourage
us
to
get
this
thing
taken
care
of,
get
it
done
once
and
for
all.
You
guys
can
move
on
with
your
business
said
you
can
move
on
with
theirs
and
we're
doing
the
right
thing
for
the
city,
not
only
residents,
but
also
the
businesses
like
here.
So
what.
A
Know
what
I
would
do
call
we're
still
mad
call
Tim
Tim
at
that
point.
What
maybe
bring
Ken
in
the
mayor
and
whomever
in
and
we'll
just
sit
down
start
take
a
look
at
things,
yeah
and
we'll
just
look
at
things
with
with
no
assurances
of
anything
at
that
point
guys.
But
you
know
if
it
is
in
an
area
where
we
really
don't
have
concerns,
and
we
know
that
then
I
don't
know
why
we
wouldn't
look
to
proceed
in
that
manner.
So.
I
I
A
A
A
So
with
that
said,
I
would
look
for
council
action.
All
in
favor
of
the
resolution
to
establish
the
moratorium
for
one
year
say:
aye
opposed
that
motion
passes
and
guys
we
will
as
soon
as
the
mirrors
back,
we
will
get
with
him
and
we
will
try
to
get
something
established
and
we'll
report
that
back
probably
through
the
council
through
through
something
in
regards
to
what
what
his
goals
are
in
regards
to
that
evaluation.
Okay,
thank
you.
C
A
C
Basically,
the
city
has
three
bargaining
units
that
represent
the
police,
the
fire
and
then
basically,
everyone
else
who
is
not
police
and
fire
and
two,
as
you
can
see,
two
of
those
three
bargaining
units
that
are
represented
by
the
police
and
fire
have
reviewed
the
three-year
contract
as
negotiated
and
as
recommended
by
the
Finance
Committee.
They
have
voted
on
their
members
and
they
have
agreed
to
the
terms,
and
so
that's
what
we're
doing
here
tonight
is
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
on
behalf
of
the
city
those
three
year
terms.
C
The
third
bargaining
unit
is
ask
me:
they
cover
all
the
other
eligible
union
employees
that
aren't
police
and
fire.
They
have
received
their
three
year.
Contract
I
did
receive
a
phone
call
on
email
today,
both
and
their
representative
has
received
it.
They
will
have
a
vote
sometime
this
week
and
they'll.
Let
us
know
there
has
been
nothing
presented
to
me
as
far
as
issues
that
that
they
might
have.
C
If,
for
some
reason
they
would
come
back
and
they
would
have
some
sort
of
concern
about
whatever
language
it
was
and
it
did
affect
the
other
two
bargaining
units,
because
we
do
have
some
uniform
language
in
there
at
that
time,
it
be
up
to
the
Finance
Committee
to
make
any
recommendations
for
changes.
If
any
and
kind
of
work
that
out,
we
could
always
do
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding
if
we
do
change
any
of
those
terms
and
they
affect
the
other
two
bargaining
units.
But
in
the
past
it's
been
pretty
standard
to
kind
of
individually.
C
Once
we
get
an
agreement
with
the
bargaining
units
to
come
and
have
them
not
all
three
Inked
at
the
same
time,
it's
pretty
standard
I,
don't
foresee
any
issues.
They
do
know
that
we
do
need
to
have
an
agreement
by
the
second
meeting
in
January
or
we
have
to
at
least
impose
a
one-year
contract
so
that
we
can
get
people
paid
at
the
end
of
January
and
have
something
in
place.
So
again,
I,
don't
foresee
any
issues
with
with
ask
me,
but
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
so
right.
A
D
Not
a
question
just
a
comment
or
I
guess
I:
ask
you
I
just
want
to
to
thank
those
involved.
I
mean
there's
an
awful
lot
of
time
in
the
part
of
Shelley
Stanton
city,
as
our
city
attorney
our
mayor,
the
union
reps
that
have
gone
into
this
and
I
guess
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
their
time
in
patience
and
in
working
through
this
and
glad.
We
only
do
it
at
once.
Every
three
years.
C
A
Thanks
to
to
the
employees
that
are
involved,
they
do
a
wonderful
job
for
our
community.
So,
okay,
we
will
move
on
to
agenda
item
number
seven,
which
is.
We
haven't,
voted
all
right,
we'll
vote
on
that
when
we
don't
leave
the
fire
department
out
all
right.
So
all
in
favor
of
the
resolution
approving
the
settlement
agreement
say
aye
opposed
that
passes
now,
we'll
go
on
to
number
seven
resolution:
number
1608,
establishing
fees
for
city
licenses,
permits
administration
and
other
miscellaneous
items.
L
C
Ii
want
you
I
apologize
when
we
were
making
those
changes.
We
were
working
off
an
older
resolution
version,
so
I
did
make
some
highlights,
and
these
were
actually
done
and
accepted
and
added
to
the
previous
resolution.
But
anytime
you
accept
another
one.
We
pretty
much
cancel
that
one
out
so
I
apologize.
There
is
nothing
that
that
changed
is
just
these
inadvertently
got
omitted
from
the
last
one
that
you
just
approved.
So
we
did
go
back.
We
did
double
check
now.
C
K
A
A
Asked
if
he
would
bring
his
staff
and
some
of
the
a
couple
of
the
council
members
together
to
go
through
and
completely
review
that
type
of
logic
in
all
the
fees
that
we
have
and
to
see.
You
know
where
there
are
some
some
items
that
you
know
in
it
there
little
things
but
like
it's,
you
know
a
photocopy
is
15
cents
at
the
library
and
it's
25
cents.
A
F
You
have
one
question
on
this:
under
liquor:
sales
for
Sunday,
we
got
$200,
we
just
recently
approved
for
the
this,
doesn't
define
on
sale
off
sale.
Okay,
this
just
says:
liquor
sales
Sunday.
We
just
approved
the
off
sale
for
sunday
liquor,
but
we
did
not
actually
tack
on
any
more
license.
We
did
on
the
on
sale
when
we
allowed
them
to
do
a
Sunday
liquor
been
brought
up
to
me.
Why?
Why
do
we
have
to
pay
the
extra
$200
and
they
don't?
This
just
defines
liquor
sales
Sunday
right.
C
I
think
and
I'm,
not
the
liquor
expert
in
our
office,
but
I
believe
that
the
liquor
sales
for
Sunday
is
on
sale,
not
off
sale
off
sale
was
already
defined
that
they
could
sell
on
Sunday
through
the
license
at
there.
They
had.
They
didn't
need
a
second
license
in
order
to
sell
on
Sunday.
That's
why
there's
not
an
additional
fee
for
them.
All
you
did
was
was
changed
the
hours,
so
the.
C
A
A
So
here
not
I
will
ask
for
counsel
action.
All
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
that
motion
passes,
move
on
Genda
item
number
eight
and
that's
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
amendment
number
one
to
the
agreement
with
Houston
engineering
for
services
associated
with
the
landfill
cells,
number
six
design
and
stormwater
analysis
Shana.
Let
you
handle
that
one
okay,.
P
P
The
memo
from
the
engineering
consultant
is
fairly
lengthy,
but
I'll
paraphrase
some
of
it
during
construction
of
self
for
the
crew
intercepted
saturates,
layer
material
and
they
tried
to
rectify
that
by
putting
in
tiles
and
gravity
draining
the
saturated
soil
layer
and,
ultimately,
that
didn't
work
and
they
had
a
collapse.
So
they
had
to
do
redo
some
work
on
self
or
on
the
construction
of
self
five.
P
They
designed
to
accommodate
more
drainage,
but
now
that
they're
going
to
design
cell
six
that's
low
enough
down
the
hill
that
they're
running
out
of
options
to
gravity
drain
those
drain
tiles.
So
their
original
engineering
agreement
did
not
include
the
design
and
analysis
of
the
storm
sewer
that
issues
that
we're
having
out
there,
and
so
the
amendment
here
for
at
requesting
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
is
an
additional
engineering
services
to
design
a
lift
station
that
will
collect
the
drainage
problem
issues
and
pump
it
out
safely
into
our
water
treatment
facilities
and
then
let
it
function.
P
So
it's
it's
a
kind
of
an
issue
that
morphed
into
an
additional
design
piece
for
this
cell
6
and
just
for
a
point
of
reference.
We
are
getting
somewhat
of
a
break
because
the
engineer
had
to
design
a
an
almost
identical
pump
station
for
another
landfill
in
the
area,
so
they
were
able
to
save
us
about
five
thousand
dollars
by
rehashing
their
other
design
and
fitting
it
to
our
site.
So
we
did
get
some
break
in
the
negotiations
of
this
fee.
So
long
story
short,
the
additional
engineering
design
work
was
required
and
we're
recommending
approval.
P
A
A
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
A
F
Q
A
Q
With
the
federal
do
T
this
morning,
and
they
are
in
the
final
stages-
were
hoping
it'll
be
early
this
week
that
we
hear
result
on
the
financial
fitness
of
a
DI,
so
they
had
one
comment
in
the
two
week
comment
period:
that's
that's
federally
regulated
to
have
so
the
government
said
yes,
you're
financially
fit.
We
have
a
two-week
comment
period,
as
anybody
have
anything
to
say
about
it.
They
had
one
comment
ended
up
that
it
was
a
false
comment.
Q
Waiting
for
this
financial
fitness
to
go
through
and
then
they
have,
they
have
an
option
to
go
back
out
for
rebid
for
their
contract.
The
essential
air
service
contract,
so
I
did
talk
to
Mickey
Bowman
as
well,
though,
and
he
said
even
if
Pierre
does
go
back
out
for
bids
and
accepts
ad
eyes
proposal
in
the
the
next
big
process.
They're
still
looking
at
April
1st
our.
If.
Q
P
H
L
P
Well,
essentially,
we're
still
gathering
information
on
how
much
discussion
has
taken
place
between
the
goe
and
their
project
proposal
as
how
it
impacts.
Esco
I
personally
have
received
a
phone
call
from
the
owner
of
Hesse
Kota,
discussed
the
operation
and
and
or
potential
closure
of
Broadway,
and
at
that
time
we
hadn't
received
an
official
petition
to
close
Broadway.
P
So
I
I
told
him
at
that
time
that
we
would
have
to
have
extensive
discussions
on
the
impacts
of
closing
Broadway
to
his
business,
and
he
did
acknowledge
that
the
weight
limits
on
the
bridge-
that's
located
north
of
his
driveway,
currently
don't
allow
him
to
handle
full
legal
limit
loads.
So
that
would
be
one
thing
that
we
would
have
to
strongly
consider
on
Broadway
going
forward
as
the
replacement
of
that
bridge,
and
you
don't
have
to
discuss
that
with
the
overall
area
and
further
again,
the
the
bridge
on
from
the
south.
P
That's
essentially
a
box
culvert.
You
know
that's
in
poor
condition
as
far
as
its
appearance,
but
it
can
adequately
handle
legal
load
trucks.
So
that's
not
an
issue,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
have
extensive
discussions
with
GL
E
and
s.
Co
and
generally
the
public
before
we
make
any
hard
fast
decisions
on
the
future
of
Broadway.
So
that's
ongoing
yeah.
A
A
Okay,
anything
on
new
business
I
would
I'd
like
to
just
talk
about
one
thing
on
new
business
and-
and
that
is
in
regards
to
the
the
article
that
was
in
the
paper
and
I
think
it
was
referencing
the
affordable
housing
by
Derby,
Downs
and
and
I
think.
The
proper
terminology
that
we
we
hope
to
use
is
workforce
housing
which
is
more
affordable,
housing
for
those
in
workforce
and
that
qualify
for
the
mortgage
type
payments,
but
I
think
if
we
all
look
back,
we
paid
for
a
housing
study
and
I
believe
that
was
presented
to
us.
A
Maybe
three
four
months
ago.
Something
like
that
and
one
of
the
things
that
was
brought
up
in
there,
which
we
all
knew
was
going
to
show
up
in.
There
was
the
lack
of
affordable
housing
in
Watertown
and,
and
that
has
been
a
long
topic
of
discussion
of
what
do.
We
do
and
there's
really
only
so
many
options
that
we
do
have.
A
But
the
thing
that
we
didn't
want
to
have
happen
was
we
did
not
want
to
have
that
report
come
in
sit
on
a
shelf
and
then
draw
dust
we
want
to
do
and
we
all
I
think
we
all
said
when
we
approved
the
financing
within
the
budget
for
that
report,
that,
if
we're
going
to
do
this,
then
let's
look
at
doing
something
with
it
and
and
this
is
that
process
it
really
just
takes.
It
takes
a
lot
of
discussion.
A
It
takes
ideas
to
get
thrown
out
on
the
wall
and
see
if
they
stick
and
see
what
has
merit
and
infeasibility
and
I.
Think
that's
what
what
the
mayor
has
done
in
his
thinking
of
the
area
mentioned
out
by
Derby
dolls,
because
it
was
city-owned
land,
that's
not
to
say
that
that
land
doesn't
have
value
to
our
community.
In
other
ways.
It
does
it's
a
it's
a
very
nice
area
out
there.
A
But
all
this
is
is
that
this
time
is
very
very
initial
discussions.
There
have
been
no
decisions
made,
but
the
the
mayor
and
staff
Shane
and
the
engineering
group
and
us
as
a
as
a
council.
We
have
to
start
having
these
discussions.
I
think
it's
unfortunate
that
the
article
did
somewhat
come
across,
like
it's
kind
of
a
dumb
deal
that's
going
in,
and
that
certainly
is
not
the
case.
That
is
just
the
a
spot,
a
spot
that
was
identified
by
the
mayor
a
number
of
months
ago.
A
Matter
of
fact,
I
think
even
mentioned
it
way
back
a
few
months
ago
within
either
a
councillor
work
session.
So
I
want
to
let
the
public
know,
and
the
mayor
wants
to
let
the
public
know
that
that
this
is
a
process.
It
is
going
to
take
a
lot
of
discussion
amongst
us.
There
is
going
to
be
a
lot
of
public
input
into
these
types
of
things.
There'll
be
public
hearings,
but
we
need
to
see
what
we
can
do
within
our
community
to
create
more
affordable
housing
for
our
people.
A
So
again
we
feel
it's
very
important
to
start
these
discussions
and
and
some
things
will
be
brought
up
and
they
might
have
merit
and
and
some
won't
and
they
might
just
go
away.
So
this
is
just
part
of
a
process
and
I
just
want
to
let
everybody
know
on.
On
behalf
of
the
mayor
and
I
think
probably
on
us
as
well
from
our
standpoint
that
I
think
the
article
somewhat
came
across
as
this
is
well
on
its
way,
and
this
is
really
the
first
little
baby
step
and
there's
nothing
other
than
discussion.
A
H
H
That's
what
was
picked
out
of
that,
and
so
all
of
this
talk
now
about
discussion
and
other
times
to
air
your
opinions
and
to
get
it
I
think
and
then
to
the
fact
that
they
were
going
to
use
the
land
right
by
the
you
know
down
by
the
arena
there
and
what's
going
to
happen
with
you
know,
are
we
going
to
have
rodeos
anymore?
Is
that
all
gone
and
if
so
where's
that
going-
and
you
know
so
there
were.
H
D
Guess
I
just
like
to
add
to
that.
This
is
by
far
generated
more
comments
and
calls
and
emails
to
me
than
anything
in
the
six
months.
I've
been
on
this
on
this
group
and
as
I
walked
through
as
I
understand
how
the
process
would
work
its
alleviate
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
people
have
had
because
they
were
on
the
impression
to
that
boy.
This
is
gonna
start
the
summer
and
we've
got
no
say
in
the
matter,
and
that
was
not
sitting
well
with
the
people
that
contacted
me.
I.
A
P
A
little
bit
essentially,
what
I
brought
that
to
the
parks
board
because
they
are
currently
managing
and
maintaining
that
property
and
I
felt
that
it
was
warranted
them
at
least
hearing
it
before
it
became
a
greater
public
knowledge
which
I
am
appreciative.
The
article
actually
wasn't
too
bad,
I
mean
for
quoting
I
mean
you
know
they
did.
He
did
a
good
job
of
quoting
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
were
made
and
where
we're
going
with
the
process
is.
This
is
a
concept
and
a
location.
P
The
concept
has
a
location
that
we're
considering
I'm,
going
to
bring
a
more
detailed
information
packet
to
the
council
at
the
next
council
meeting
in
the
work
session.
So
we'll
well
that'll
be
a
broader
discussion
of
the
concept,
and
then
you
know
if
the
concept
starts
to
take
shape,
will
will
eventually
end
up
in
the
Planning
Commission
process.
You
know
where
we
get
our
preliminary
plan
and
our
or
all
those
hoops
and
the
public
hearing
and
and
all
those
things
will
come
forward
out
of
this
process.
P
Now
that
doesn't
mean
that
the
concept
isn't
gonna
change
locations,
it
could
change
and
be
anywhere
within
the
city
limits.
The
one
reason
this
particular
location
was
chosen
for.
The
concept,
though,
is
that
the
land
is
available
to
us
and
it's
free
anywhere
else.
We
may
have
additional
expenses
by
buying
available
land
someplace
to
do
a
project
like
this,
which
of
course
then
impacts
the
bottom
line
of
how
much
of
a
project
can
you
do
so
we
do
have
some
budget
in
2016
to
do
some
work.
A
J
I
The
one
thing
that
you're
probably
concerned
me
was,
you
know:
I
wasn't
privy
to
any
of
this
and
I
as
a
sort
of
embarrassed
because
they
did
not
answer
their
questions.
I
said:
I
hadn't
heard
all
these
things.
You
know
so
certainly
I
hope,
moving
forward
that
we're
all
kept
abreast
of
of
what's
going
on
and
step
by
step
through
this
process
right.
P
F
D
F
Think
that
you
know
one
of
the
big
things
is
if
we're
gonna
have
that
on
work
session.
Next
next,
two
weeks
lean
on
the
media
a
little
bit
to
help
us
out
to
get
that
word
out
to
the
people
out
in
that
area.
You
know
if
they
want
to
get
involved
in
and
give
us
their
comments.
Please
encourage
them
to
get
their
that
next
meeting.
So.
A
Any
other
items
that
would
fall
under
new
business
that
you
would
like
to
speak
about
I
will
tell
you
in
regards
to
executive
session
I
with
the
mayor
not
being
here,
I
told
him
unless
he
can
make
some
commitment
to
this
council
being
nicer
in
2016,
that
we
were
going
to
go
into
executive
session
and
impeach
him,
but
he
made
a
commitment
that
he's
going
to
be
nicer,
so
I
have
no
reason
going
an
executive
session.
So
that
said,
do
I
have
a
motion
to
end
motion
by
john
ii
by
glenn.