►
From YouTube: BOA Meeting 01 19 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
A
B
C
B
A
Right,
thank
you.
Application
to
a
submitted
requesting
construct,
a
non-conforming,
5,000,
62
square
foot,
commercial
building
with
a
944
square
foot,
drive-through
canopy
and
approximately
27,000
568
square
feet
parcel
located
in
the
c
3
highway
commercial
district
said,
structure
be
constructed,
8
feet
from
the
side.
North
property
line
or
20-foot
setback
is
required
and
15
feet
from
the
front
west
property
line
or
40
feet
is
required.
A
A
Even
with
FEMA
is
no
mo,
in
addition
to
the
redevelopment,
this
property
with
a
non-conforming
structure,
the
submitted
site
plan
does
not
meet
the
minimum
order.
Clearance
for
landscape
and
parking
lot.
I'm,
not
gonna,
go
all
through
all
those,
because
this
again,
this
is
kind
of
a
peculiar
item.
In
the
main
things
that
we
need
to
concentrate
on
with
you
guys
is
to
allow
or
consider
the
setbacks
this
way
in
this
way.
A
So,
even
when
you
do
your
approval
tonight,
I'm
gonna
be
asking
for
another
kind
of
a
blanket
open
thing,
what's
required
to
any
screening
requirements,
any
landscape
requirements
everything
else,
because
this
is
in
the
flood
way.
We
have
to
make
sure
we
meet
the
floodway
FEMA
requirements
with
that
in
conjunction
so
that'll
go
for
screening,
trees,
curb
and
gutter
and
those
other
items
and.
A
But
I
chain
might
have
to
jump
in
correct
me
on
this,
but
they
have
already
contacted
a
few
months,
so
they're
gonna
take
out
a
bigger
footprint
and
put
in
a
lesser
footprint,
so
they're
actually
going
to
be
improving
that
amount
of
restrictions
that
will
be
in
the
area,
the
actual
building
elevation
of
this
area
and
what
they're
going
on
is
it
above
that
flood
like
base
flood
elevation
requirement,
and
but
those
are
all
those
final
things
still
need
to
be
put
together
and
no
permit,
even
with
your
approval
tonight.
If
can.
B
B
D
So
they
met
with
staff,
and
we
reviewed
that
and
what
they
had
done
before
they
met
with
us,
was
have
a
surveyor
go
out
and
verify
elevations
around
the
existing
Goodyear
property
and
that
elevation
work
showed
that
the
majority
of
the
Goodyear
property
in
building
structure
is
technically
outside
of
the
floodway.
At
this
point,
based
on
elevation,
the
the
floodway
is
a
model
that
that
FEMA
created
and
and
and
doesn't
recognize
the
local
elevations.
Perhaps.
D
So
what
they've
done
now,
then,
is
they're
working
with
FEMA
and
they're.
Reducing
the
footprint
of
the
new
buildings
gonna
be
a
much
greater
reduced
footprint
than
the
existing
structure.
So
our
recommendation
was
that
they
work
with
FEMA
and
if
they
could
get
all
the
FEMA
approvals
that
this
building
would
be
allowable
to
be
built
at
within
the
portion
of
the
Goodyear
property.
That
should
be
out
of
the
floodway
based
on
elevation,
correct,
so
they'll.
D
So
so
they're
in
the
process
of
doing
all
that-
and
you
know
so-
it's
really
final
approval
we'll
be
hanging
on
FEMA
and
then
the
other.
Only
other
consideration
here,
which
isn't
really
a
concern
of
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
is
that
they're
working
on
their
final
approval
for
their
driveway
entrance
from
the
d-o-t
and
the
d-o-t
just
wants
them
to
retain
their
existing
driveway
and
I.
Think
they
can
make
that
work
and
everybody
will
be
happy.
So
my.
D
So
the
d-o-t:
that's
why
the
d-o-t
is
recommending
that
the
existing
driveway
stay,
as
is
what
their
footprint
and
then
because
they're
gonna
come
back
and
improve
it.
So
that's
why
they're
recommending
that
the
driveway
entrance
stay
where
it
is
and
how
it
is
at
this
time.
Yes
and
then
they
can
improve
everything
on
the
interior
side
of
that
lot
and
I
can't
speak
for
the
d-o-t,
but
I
believe
this
might
be
in
an
area
where
they're
requiring
up
to
five
feet
of
additional
right
away.
Anyway,.
B
A
To
allow
for
the
parking
as
they
proposed
and
everything
else
on
there
and
actually
within
our
ordinance,
that
site
is
in
line
with
these
other
existing
buildings
to
in
a
car
to
be
allowed
to
be
within
that
area
anyway,
because
it's
already
just
matching
the
existing
structures
to
the
north
of
it.
You
know,
but
to
make
the
parking
work
along
the
easterly
side
of
it
to
have
a
driveway
in
the
parking
and
everything
else
in
there.
It's.
A
F
A
F
A
A
B
A
A
G
A
A
A
A
If
it's
allowed
by
FEMA
to
add
the
screening,
then
we'll
put
the
screening
in
it.
But
if
you
must
says
no,
that's
in
the
floodway
and
that's
in
the
other
part
and
it's
gonna
create
an
obstruction.
Then
no
we're
not
going
to
require
them
to
do
that.
That's
going
to
be
the
same
thing
with
the
possibility
of
a
tree
here
you
might
say
the
same
thing
no
tree.
A
A
B
E
B
Thing
I
always
like
to
say
too
is
we
have
eight
members
on
this
part?
It
takes
five
five,
yes,
five
as
regardless
of
the
attendance,
so
it
does
require
all
five
members
that
are
here
today
to
vote
YES
for
the
variance
to
move
forward
at
any
time.
If
the
applicant
would
like
to
table
the
motion
until
the
next
meeting,
they
can
do
that.
Also
for
the
record.
C
Is
the
public
still
open,
I'd
like
to
say
a
couple
words?
If
I
may
it's
interesting
to
see
this
happen
on
this
corner,
because
if
you
look
further
down
into
our
CIP,
which
is
about
three
or
four
years
within
the
city,
we're
looking
expanding
11th
Street
to
carry
right
down
to
Jensen
Avenue,
which
this
will
be
an
attractive
spot
for
that
for
that
row,
so
I'm
totally
in
favor
of
this?
Just
so
just
so,
you
would
know
that.
H
My
name
is
Dan
Kumbi
and
I'm.
The
president
of
Dakota
Land,
Federal,
Credit
Union.
We
have
nine
branches
across
eastern
South
Dakota
and
we
have
already
applied
and
received
our
Loma
from
from
FEMA
and
it's
a
meets
and
bounds,
meaning
the
current
footprint
is
like,
in
all
essence,
a
dam
of
that
that
Creek
and
it's
row,
B
Creek,
just
the
history
on
Robie
Creek.
H
We
went
with
or
found
out
in
that
Loma
process
at
row.
B
Creek
in
1905
I
think
was
filled
in
through
here
and
there's
a
big
six-foot
culvert
that
comes
under
11th
Street,
and
so
essentially
the
Creek
has
been
moved
from
surface
Creek
to
underground.
However,
it
can
still
flood,
and
so,
if
it
ever
were
to
flood
and
over
overrun
that
that
culvert
it's
going
to
spread
out
quite
a
bit,
because
that
is
pretty
flat
in
that
area
and
so
the
engineer
out
of
Omaha.
He
said
that
really
this
flood
way
is
fictional.
H
Now,
not
quite
all
of
it
was
mapped
out
and
there's
a
really
detailed
map
that
Loma
has
or
this
loma
letter
of
map
adjustment
has
taken
out
of
the
flood
flood
way
or
out
of
the
flood
zone.
It
still
leaves
a
nice
area
right
through
the
center,
and
actually
it
reduces
the
amount
of
damming
so
to
speak,
because
really
in
a
flood
way,
you
don't
want
to
back
the
water
up.
You
know
and
create
problems
for
your
neighbors
upstream.
You
don't
want
to
let
that
water
flow
through
and
our
plan
will
do
that.
H
But
in
that
Loma
we
had
to
stay
approximately
80
feet
from
the
east
border.
That's
kind
of
the
setback
that
Loma
has
in
in
stone
approximately
80
feet,
and
so
we
are
we're.
Gonna,
be
right
up
to
the
edge
of
that
and
and
with
our
structure
with
the
15
foot
setback.
You
know,
that's
what
we
need,
because
FEMA
kind
of
trumps
everybody
with
their
rules.
You
know
we
have
80
foot,
essentially
an
80
foot
setback
from
the
East
line
in
a
15
foot
from
the
west
side,
and
then
that
just
leaves
about
a
couple
feet.
H
B
G
B
Concern
was
the
11th
Street.
Shame
one
quick
question
on
11th
Street
is
that
some
day
may
extend
through
there?
What's
the
width
of
that
Street,
that's
a
collector
Street
there
and
is
set
back
off
the
actual
Street
we're
not
gonna
we're
not
gonna,
put
a
building
there
and
then
need
to
widen
that
Street.
Are
we
well.