![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/JX1BtMnrXCM/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 04 06 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
B
B
You
first
item
on
the
agenda:
is
the
approval
of
the
agenda?
Could
I
get
a
motion?
A
second
motion
by
mr.
Arnold
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion.
Carries
second
item.
Is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
the
February
23rd
2017
meeting
motion
by
mr.
stone
Barger
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
rizona
cax.
First
addition
are
three
from
an
r3
multifamily
residential
district
to
an
r1
single-family
residential
district
go
ahead,
Brandi.
A
So
Steve
Horning,
with
cax
lakeside
addition
incorporated
submitted
an
application
and
petition
requesting
approval
for
rezoning
the
current
described
property
from
r3
multifamily
residential
districts,
who
are
one
single-family
residential
district.
The
adjacent
zoning
designation
is
r3
to
the
north
and
R
2
R
3,
which
is
multi-family
residential
and
then
r2,
which
is
single-family
attached
residential
to
the
South.
A
The
adjacent
public
right-of-ways
will
be
included
in
the
rezone
and
it
meets
the
requirements
for
an
r1
minimum
lot
requirement
and
although
some
of
the
Lots
with
the
coming
plat
will
appear
small,
they
it'll
fit
because
they're
going
to
be
doing
a
smaller
Habitat
for
Humanity
homes
in
this
area.
That's
why
that's
the
reason
for
the
rezone
and
then
it
does
lie
within
the
AE
floodplain
zone.
A
D
B
D
B
By
mr.
stone
barker
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
any
other
discussion
on
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
any
commercial,
we're
kind
of
actually
going
down
and
zoning
and
we've
got
our
across
street,
so
it
makes
sense,
call
for
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say.
Aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda
item
number
four
rezone
of
this
laments
key
2nd
edition
from
a
c2
local
commercial
to
r3,
multifamily
residential.
A
So
the
petitioners
James
K,
Lindsey,
revocable,
revocable
trust
the
property
owner
and
then
the
interested
parties,
Suite
Properties
LLC,
submitted
the
application
and
petition
requesting
approval
for
rezoning
the
current
described
property
from
C
to
local
commercial
district
to
r3
multifamily
residential
district,
which
is
this
area.
That's
hashed
with
the
black
outline.
It's
43
feet.
B
A
B
B
C
B
D
It
don't
come
back
for
a
variance
how
much.
B
C
A
B
D
B
C
A
Okay,
so
the
Morris
family
is
the
petitioner
who
submitted
the
plat
on
March
17
2017,
requesting
approval
of
the
plat
of
Morris.
First
addition,
the
preliminary
plan
of
Morris
first
edition
was
approved
by
the
Planning
Commission
on
February
23rd
of
2017
with
conditions.
The
adjacent
zoning
designation
is
all
c3.
A
A
Detention
pond
is
required
to
hold
a
two-year
capacity
volume
for
the
Willow
Creek
watershed
which
will
be
included
in
the
regional
pond
for
the
area
and
the
conditions
from
resolution.
20
1709
have
been
met.
A
development
agreement
has
been
drafted
from
the
preliminary
plan
and
with
that
we
did
make
a
few
changes
to
the
development
agreement
just
with
working
with
municipal
utilities
and
making
sure
that
we
were
accounting
for
the
private
water
lines
that
is
requested
by
the
petitioner
and
I
can
pull
that
up.
A
B
D
D
C
An
existing
storm
sewer
system
there
and
they're
gonna
utilize
that
and
part
of
the
storm
water
treatment
facilities
will
be
over
on
coho
property.
This
is
a
cooperative
effort
between
coho
and
Morris,
and
then
the
Morris
Platt
also
then
includes
two
private
ponds
located
on
its
own
property
as
well.
You're.
B
With
that,
I'll
open
did
have
all
be
caring,
yet
I'll
do
that.
If
anyone
has
anything
say
four
against
the
Platte
I
approached
the
mic,
you
guys
have
taken
a
look
at
floodplain
drainage,
lot,
sizes
right
away.
Everything
is
within
code
on
this.
You
know,
I,
look
down
as
we're.
26Th
Street
comes
down
onto
someone
else's
property
there.
I
assume
this
is
all
going
to
work
its
way
through
the
system.
We're
here
to
take
a
look
at
just
adjust
the
Morris
property
right
now
correct
yep,
these
Lots
1
&
2
of
these
large
Lots.
B
C
And
actually
lot
1
&
2
of
block
3
already
in
negotiations
for
future
purchase,
buy
from
coho.
B
C
D
C
We
call
them
private
roads,
but
what
they're
gonna
be
is
shared
internal
driveways
between
properties.
So
wearing
that's
the
conversation
when
we
reviewed
this
street
layout
with
the
developers,
as
you
know,
we're
minimum.
We
have
a
minimal
amount
of
actual
public
street
and
right
away
in
these
plans,
but
we
so
we
have
that
conversation
with
them
and
we're
encouraging
that
they
align
their
parking,
lots
and
so
forth,
so
that
they
work
together
to
minimize
and
others
role
in
allowing
so
many
driveways
on
to
the
public
street.
C
C
C
And
the
attorney
can
help
me
with
that
a
little
bit
we
do
have
regulations
within
the
community
that,
if
somebody
let's
park
private
parking,
lots
that
the
public's
intended
to
use
if
they
get
dilapidated
far
enough,
the
city
does
have
a
procedure
to
enforce
them,
to
update
and
maintain
their
Lots.
But
again
this
is
private
property
and
and
they'll
have
to
build
and
accommodate
for
each
other
as
well.
Okay,.
D
D
A
One
more
comment
just
for
assurance
for
municipal
utilities
is
that
machine
is
working
on
a
letter
of
assurance
to
take
care
of
the
private
water
lines
and
then
because
here
we
have
it
changed
this
used
to
be
seven
services.
Now
it's
changing
to
five
and
we
have
the
language
also
in
there
that,
because
usually
the
developer
shall
install
our
cause
to
be
installed.
The
water
services
to
the
property
line,
and
so
the
city
will
work
on
a
letter
to
them.
Just
reassuring.
Look.
C
I'll,
give
you
a
little
more
background
on
commercial
properties,
a
lot
of
times
the
municipal
utility.
You
know.
That's
all
pride,
all
those
services
are
private
and,
depending
on
what
type
of
facility
goes
in
there,
whether
it
needs
sprinkling
or
not,
is
not
something
that
the
municipal
utilities
deals
with.
It's
all
up
to
the
designer
in
the
facility
that's
going
to
be
built
eventually
on
those
Lots
from
my
perspective,
as
manager
of
the
public
right
away.
C
If
we're
building
the
road
ahead
of
the
buildings,
we
need
to
have
a
certain
level
of
service
line
coming
off
of
the
main
into
private
property,
and
so
I
use
the
baseline
standard
of
a
six
inch
service
line,
because
that's
what
we'd
use
for
fire
hydrants.
So
my
presumption
is
that
most
buildings
would
be
adequately
provided
service
with
a
six-inch
service
line
if
it
can
in
fact
be
satisfactory
for
a
fire
hydrant.
C
So
with
that
said,
I
plan
on
stubbing
six
inch
lines
or
having
the
developer
stub
six
inch
lines
into
these
slots
and
what
the
utilities
are
saying
is
if
the
we
don't
subsequently
use
those
six
inch
lines
or
whatever
the
city
or
somebody
needs
to
commit
to
going
back
and
capping
them.
My
idea
is
I
want
those
put
in
ahead
of
time
so
I'm
not
digging.
C
B
All
right,
thank
you
and
a
motion
by
mr.
Arnold
second
by
mr.
Steinberg
that
correct
any
other
questions.
All
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
any
old
business.
New
business
yep.
All
right
I
need
a
motion
to
adjourn
mr.
Dahle
second
by
mr.
Arnold.
All
in
favor,
say,
aye
opposed
motion
carries
were
adjourned.