![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/X9ZOb5rg0QM/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 02 23 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
C
C
E
A
These
are
council
liaison
mister
Albertson
you'll,
be
straight
to
the
principal's
office.
First
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
agenda
Coutu
get
motion
in
a
second
motion
by
mr.
Hanson's
second
by
mr.
stone,
Barbara
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
second
item.
Is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
February
9
2017
a
motion,
mr.
Arland
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
third
item
on
the
agenda
as
a
resident
resolution
amending
chapter
twenty
one
point:
two:
three
and
regarded
the
RGB
residential
garage
district.
C
So
then
it
was
brought
as
new
business
and
old
business
and
then,
as
of
last
meeting,
we
came,
or
you
guys
came
to
the
conclusion
of
raising
the
maximum
sidewall
to
sixteen
foot,
to
revise
the
written
consent
percentage
to
be
55
percent
instead
of
a
hon
percent
of
all
property
owners.
Owning
property
immediately
adjacent
to
the
proposal
to
allow
a
sanitary
sewer
connection,
leave
finishes
for
structure
aesthetics
up
to
the
building
officials.
Discussion
and
includes
sidewall
articulation
language.
C
There
you'll
see
the
written
consent
changed
to
the
preferred
55%
for
property
owners
immediately
adjacent
to
the
proposed
zone
and
property
owners
within
250
feet
of
the
proposed
zone,
and
then
this
change
here
is
just
changing
into
a
sentence.
It
was
just
a
clerical
thing
if
we're
doing
amendments,
and
then
here
is
where
a
garage
is
maximum.
Sidewall
Heights
shall
not
exceed
16
feet
and
then
the
sidewall
articulation
comes
in
at
F,
where
it
says
a
sidewall
of
a
building
that
it
exceeds
twelve
feet
in
height
and
20.
C
So
as
long
as
you
don't,
if
your
side
wall
is
taller
than
12
feet
and
it's
not
longer
than
20
foot,
you
don't
need
sidewall
articulation
and
then
that's
what
this
is
show.
This
figure
is
showing,
and
then
this
figure
is
showing
that
if
it
was
higher
than
12
foot
the
sidewall
height,
then
the
run.
If
the
run
is
over
20
foot,
then
they
need
to
include
the
articulation
like
so
and
then
just
for
clarity.
A
One
thing
brandy
and
I
talked
to
Dennis
about
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
talk
to
anybody
else
on
it
is
when
I
went
back
and
looked
our
minimum
lot
size
in
the
RG
district
is
five
thousand
square
feet.
Our
maximum
building
size
is
2,100
square
feet,
which
is
43
percent
of
the
lot
coverage,
which
is
fine
that
that's
what
we
but
what
we,
what
we
haven't
covered
here
is
somebody
who
has
a
bigger
lot.
A
A
What
I
looked
at
and
I
talked
to
Dennis
on
it
is
this
if
we
could
add
into
the
ordinance
that
says:
2120
180s
your
maximum
building
size
or
20%,
whichever
is
greater,
which
means,
if
you
got
a
25,000
square
foot
lot,
you
could
put
up
a
5,000
square
foot,
building
you're
still
only
using
20%
of
the
lot
coverage.
The
rest
of
the
lot
is
vacant
bare.
You
know
in
that
my
thought
was
a
larger
building.
What
we
did
with
the
5020
180
is.
We
said
we
don't
want
too
much
building
on
too
small
a
lot.
A
B
A
Our
thought
is
trying
to
make
it
look
like
it
belongs
there,
and
there
are.
You
know
what
we
found.
We
started
this
garage
district
and
we
kind
of
threw
it
up
against
the
wall
a
few
years
ago
and
said
we're
gonna
put
something
out
there
that
we
think
has
a
need,
but
it
really
hasn't
been
used
very
much.
You
know,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
lots
out
there
that
fit
into
this
5,000
square
foot
area.
A
That
makes
sense,
but
I
think
we're
gonna
find
there's
some
larger
Lots
out
there
too,
that
people
would
put
a
little
bigger
building
on
and
when
you
start
looking
at
your
building
sizes,
a
40
foot
width
building,
a
20
foot
to
foot
pontoon
takes
up
37
feet
from
the
back
of
the
motor
to
the
front
of
the
tongue.
I
measured
it
you're
gonna
find
guys
that
are
gonna
want
50s
and
60s
now,
so
they
can
get
them
in
and
move
them.
A
You
know
they
might
be
wide
and
more
narrow,
but
I
do
think
we
might
find
some
bigger
Lots
that
are
out
there.
That
guys
are
gonna
want
to
put
one
big
building,
because
their
only
option
would
be
to
split
the
lot
and
make
it
two
lots
and
put
two
smaller
buildings
on
there
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
what
we
want
either
from
the
busyness.
Looking
I'd
rather
see
one
large
building
on
large
lot
than
a
bunch
of
small
buildings
on
there
taking
up
more
lot
coverage
than
a
large
building,
but
my
thoughts
in
it.
F
A
C
D
A
I'm
just
gonna
say
anything
I'm,
just
gonna
say
our
lot
size
I
way,
I
did
it
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
right
or
wrong
is
maximum
building
size
is
20,
180
or
20%.
Whichever
is
greater,
which
means
20%
could
be
greater,
but
that
if
we
said
20%
well,
then
a
5,000
square
foot
lot
can
only
put
up
a
thousand
foot
building
I.
A
G
H
Don't
have
a
preference
myself
I
just
want
to
put
this
out
there
in
2013
when
this
our
G
district
came
forward.
At
least
one
member
of
the
council
is
how
that
limit
of
20
180
got
set
and
I.
Don't
know
how
the
council
would
receive
your
new
recommendations,
of
course,
because
we
haven't
discussed
this
before
this
point
in
time,
but
I
do
know
that
they
were
concerned
about
the
size
of
the
garages
on
these
Lots
at
that
time,
and
they
may
not
share
your
the
board's
opinion
on
you.
A
Know
I
think
that's
why
we're
talking
on
bigger
Lots
I
mean
they're
20
180
on
a
small
lot
versus
20
180
I
mean
you
look
and
go
say
guys,
guys
1,
there's
25,000
square
foot
Lots
out
there
and
we're
limiting
them
to
almost
8%
of
their
light
usage.
They
can't
put
a
house
there
because
the
sewer
is
three-quarters
of
a
mile
away.
True.
A
A
F
F
A
F
G
A
Know
we
used
to
be
able
to
do
that
where
we
had
areas
of
art
to
highlighted
and
potential
r2
it'd
be
interesting
to
see,
and
we
did
it
with
fireworks.
Also
of
what
Lots
were
available
to
have
fireworks
stands
it'd
be
interesting
to
see
if
we
could,
what
plaited
Lots
in
the
city
limits
would
fall
into
that
category,
where
there's
enough
square
footage
to
qualify
as
or
as
a
garage
district
and
how
big
those
Lots
are.
I'm.
H
A
I
was
seeing
rise
to
that.
We
just
I
thought
this
would
be
the
a
really
neat
district
on
the
outskirts
of
all
these
developments
in
the
less
valuable,
lower
land
and
I.
Think
in
in
some
cases
we
haven't
had
a
big
development
come
in
yet
and
I
think
some
of
these
other
areas.
You
know
this
particular
area
and
antelope
Lane
over
here
we've
gone
back
to
this
one
many
times
can
you
put
up
there
just
out
of
curiosity
where
the
sewer
and
water
is.
A
You
go
further
down
to
your
lower
corner
there.
These
are
the
Lots
that
I
that
that
people
have
come
to
me
on
see
how
far
they
are
from
the
sewer
I
mean
these
are
all
these
Lots
are
all
owned
by
someone
else,
and
you
could
be
go
even
further
down
where
hessed
Ed's
are
way
down
there.
You
know,
there's
some
sewer
that
so
sewer
does
run
through
that
area
where
they
could
hook
in,
but
those
Center
Lots,
there's
no
sewer
access
to
any
of
them.
A
If
you
go
back
see
all
those
Lots
right
there
that
there
are
long
ways
from
the
sewer,
so
those
Lots
sit
there.
Vacant
idle
can't
put
a
house
there,
because
it's
it's
my
understanding
that,
if
you're
in
this
one
of
these
lots
that
are
far
away,
how
do
you
get?
How
do
you
get
the
sewer
to
you
who
pays
for
it?
A
F
But
in
one
sense,
if
we
require
that
and
that
might
muddy
the
water
a
little
bit
in
this,
our
G
district
they've
got
a
dig
sewer
in
from
across
the
road
and
dig
up
the
road
and
repair
the
road
and
everything
else.
What
would
the
thoughts
be?
I,
just
I'm,
just
thinking
out
loud
of
letting
them
have
a
holding
tank
KITT.
F
F
F
A
H
Don't
know
I
can't
see
the
drawings
like
I
can't
answer
your
question.
I
can't
see
the
screen,
but
typically
okay,
standard
development.
You
extend
the
till
these
that
you
think
the
property
needs
in
front
of
the
property,
so
they
have
access.
So
if
there
isn't
any
sewer,
you
would
have
to
evaluate
whether
a
it's
available
to
to
extend
that
way
and
maintain
its
standard
depths
that
we
like
to
design
in
and
B,
then
somebody's
going
to
have
to
weigh
whether
it's
cost-effective
to
do
this
now.
H
One
thing
we
haven't
discussed
here
is
by
adding
sewer
and
water
to
these
provisions.
They
will
be
getting
a
sewer
of
charge
and
pay
at
least
the
base,
sewer
charge
and
meter
charges
and
all
that
stuff
you're
tying
that
to
this
development
as
well.
So
that
said,
you'd
still
have
to
extend
utilities
by
by
our
standard
ordinances
and
procedures
to
allow
them
to
have
the
utilities.
Now,
if
it
happens
to
be
there
already,
then
that
investments
already
been
made
been
me,
but
if
it
doesn't
exist,
somebody
would
have
to
develop
and
install
said
utilities.
I
A
H
Then
and
that's
not
to
say
that
that
can't
be
extended
to
closer
to
them,
but
that
somebody's
cost.
Then,
with
regard
to
the
question
that
mr.
Arnold
asked
about
holding
tanks
the
caveat
to
holding
tanks
in
this
community
is
we
have
a
very
extensive
portion
of
the
city,
that's
in
the
aquifer
protection
zone
and
that
puts
arduous
criteria
on
those
holding
tanks.
B
I'm
sorry
sidewall
articulation
and
then
even
with
the
it
does,
we
don't
really
address
the
eve
issue.
I
know
we
have
one
foot
to
me:
one
foot
really
isn't
enough
and
if
you're
afters
are
yeah
I'm,
sorry
you
want
me
to
start
over.
Then
all
right.
We
talked
about
the
the
one
foot
in
depth.
You
know,
realistically
your
rafters
gonna
be
a
minimum
of
two
foot.
That
I
don't
think
one
is
enough
and
then
to
me
you
know
the
eaves
I
guess
also
should
have
a
be
in
proportion
with
the
height
of
the
building.
A
F
A
F
F
F
F
D
J
C
What
and
where
I
came
up
with
the
1
foot
by
6
foot
is
I
modeled
it
from
st.
Paul's,
and
they
said
that
that
was
an
issue
that
they
ran
into
is
not
having
their
if
it
could
encroach
in
their
side,
yard
setbacks.
And
that's
where
I
think
it
would
just
I
mean
we,
wouldn't
that
wouldn't
even
be
an
issue,
because
it
would
just
be
included
in
your
set
back
like
that.
You
would
still
have
the
same
setback
and
if
you
had
to.
F
Up
I
guess
you
have
to
narrow
your
whole
garage.
Oh,
that's!
That's
the
bottom
line.
I'd
rather
see
it
look.
Nice
I
mean
that's
the
reason
we're
going
through
this
whole
exercise
of
change
in
this
whole
ordinance
is
to
allow
people
to
use
these
garages,
make
them
practical,
but
make
them
look
nice
when
we're
finished.
A
J
I
J
E
I'm
Mike,
Lawrence,
yeah,
I,
guess,
I
see
what
you're
doing
and
I
just
want
you
to
look
at
like
the
rough
line
in
the
rafter
line.
When
you
think
about
bumping
that
out
as
well
as
aesthetically
I
mean
if
you
side
that
the
same
color
as
the
rest
of
the
building
you're
gonna
that
bump
out,
doesn't
it
isn't
added
any
more
attraction
in
my
book
you
just
have
a
bump
out
with
the
exact
same
color
as
the
rest
of
your
shed.
I
mean
yeah.
E
It
makes
it
not
so
big
and
boxy,
but
it
just
it's
still.
Plain
Jane
with
I
mean
if
you,
if
I,
build
a
50
foot
by
twenty
foot,
shed
and
I
the
whole
thing
Stan
and
I
bump
it
out
you're,
not
gaining
anything
by
having
that
bump
out
there.
In
my
opinion,
it
just
looks
like
an
ulcer
sticking
out
of
the
building.
I
mean
you
got
to
look
at
it.
That
way,
as
at
one
point
that
could
look
worse.
B
F
Know
Dennis,
you
got
no
solutions.
Last
meeting
Brandi
brought
pictures
and
showed
us
garages
that
were
built
like
the
one
on
the
left
and
one
and
ones
that
were
done
with
some
bump
outs
on
the
right.
Your
picture
that
you're
showing
we're
not
saying
every
single
garage
that
have
it
it
has
a
two-foot
jog
and
the
wall
has
to
look
like
that.
No.
F
A
That's
what
I
was
gonna
say
we
put
the
verbage
in
there
that
the
intent
of
the
ordinance
to
what
we
wanted
to
do.
We
wanted
to
allow
people
to
to
make
their
buildings
more
functional
for
the
properties
that
we're
asking
them
to
store
inside
basing
it
on
the
size
of
the
Lots.
But
we
want
that
building
official.
You
still
have
to
use
the
the
customary
materials
used
on
the
homes.
You
know
in
your
right,
Mike
everyone
somebody's
going
to
go
out
there
and
build
the
minimum
standards
yeah.
E
A
Hope
is
people
go
out
there
and
say
I
own
the
half,
a
million
dollar
house
across
the
street
I'm
not
going
to
put
a
junk
shed
up
across
the
road
you'd
hope
they
do,
but
eventually
somebody's
going
to
put
a
minimum
standard
building
across
from
someone
else's
property.
That's
where
we
want
to
put
a
little
bit
of
a
stopgap
in
there
with
the
building.
F
I
A
I
J
Talked
about
that,
you
know
all
the
different
methods
that
you
can
utilize
on
those
high
side.
Walls
I
mean
you
could
do
you
know
brick
part
of
the
way
up
and
then
siding
and
there's
any
number
of
features
that
you
can
from
an
aesthetic
portion.
Do
you
dial
it
in
and
spell
it
all
out
here
kind
of
leave
it
up
to
to
Ken
to
make
that
call?
Yes,
that's
the
question,
but
it
should
be
aesthetically.
Pleasing
is
the
point
of
it.
You.
F
Know
and
I
look
at
this.
This
way,
I,
don't
think
the
we
as
a
board
can't
dictate
how
somebody
who
builds
their
buildings
and
what
they
wanted
to
look
like
it's
their
money
and
they're
spending
their
money.
But
if
we're
gonna
do
something,
it's
it's
our
responsibility,
because
what
we
allow
and
what
we
don't
law
allow
the
citizens
of
Watertown
have
to
look
at
for
the
next
hundred
years.
F
C
A
A
I
C
A
E
G
A
I
C
A
A
Right
that
was
my
point,
as
is
these
buildings
on
large
lots.
You,
if
you
limit
to
a
smaller
building,
it's
a
very
small
building
on
a
large
lot,
looks
out
of
place
in
an
area
because
there
won't
be
a
house
there.
You
know
you
there's
no
room
for
a
home,
you
know
there's
no,
allowing
for
a
home
there.
J
A
A
C
Okay,
so
the
Watertown
School
District
Lake,
Area,
Technical,
Institute,
South,
Dakota,
Health
and
educational
facilities
in
the
South
Dakota
Board
of
Education,
submit
an
application
and
petition
requesting
approval
for
rezoning
the
current
described
property
from
our
for
manufactured
house,
our
homes,
residential
district
to
our
three
multi-family
residential
district.
They
previously
received
a
conditional
use
from
the
Board
of
Adjustment
on
February
9th,
because
schools
are
conditional
uses
in
residential
districts,
but
they're
not
allowed
in
our
four,
but
are
they
are
allowed
in
our
three
adjacent
zoning
designations?
C
There
you've
got
c2
to
the
south
r3
to
the
north
and
east
and
r2a
to
the
west.
The
adjacent
public
right-of-ways
will
be
included
in
the
rezone.
It
meets
all
the
requirements
for
our
three
minimum
sizes.
Municipal
utilities
will
provide
service
to
the
annex
property.
Oh,
that
is
not.
This
is
not
getting.
J
C
A
C
C
A
A
A
D
H
Think
that
that's
more
common,
particularly
in
communities
that
Harbor
larger
state
or
private
universities,
probably
more
so
than
the
small
you
know
we
know
it-
hasn't-
been
commonly
used
for
elementary
schools,
middle
schools
and
high
schools,
but
it
certainly
at
the
next
level
of
Education.
It's
a
lot
more
common
and
also
it's
becoming
more
common
in
districts
or
areas
that
house
hospital
facilities,
because
Hospital
hospital
facilities
used
to
be
pretty
small
and
on
a
local
scale
and
now
they're
becoming
regional
centers
and
occupying
a
larger
footprint
in
the
community.
H
So
I
think
that,
at
least
from
my
perspective
and
the
staff
and
we've
been
visiting
the
first
district
a
little
bit
about
this
as
well,
that
we
would
like
to
figure
out
how
we
would
incorporate
a
campus
district
zone
into
our
system,
and
so
I
would
say
that
we're
we're
talking
about
it
behind
the
scenes.
We,
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
momentum
right
at
this
moment,
because
we've
had
a
lot
of
other
ordinance
and
and
policy
changes
that
we've
been
reviewing.
But
I
I
would
like
to
think
that
we're
gonna
step
to
that
subject.
H
A
Thank
you
and
I'll
remember
to
use
that
it
when
I'm
behind
I,
don't
have
a
lot
of
momentum.
I
like
that
politically
correct.
Thank
you
that
answer
your
question
John.
What's
the
advantage
of
that
institutional
district
I
mean
here,
we
we
have
existing
zoning
I
mean
I
can
see
it
in
a
new,
a
newly
planted
piece
of
property
in
an
existing
zone.
We
would
just
rezone
what
we
have
to
institutional.
Is
it
building
Heights
setbacks
or
those
are
things
that
they
they're
out
of
the
ordinary
with
well.
H
Yes,
but
what
what
giving
a
its
own
zoning
district
would
do
is
it
would
maybe
reduce
the
amount
of
public
hearings
like
we
have
these
public
hearings,
where
we
include
the
whole
neighborhood,
you
know,
or
everything
that
kind
of
touches
or
within
impact
or
what
we
perceive
an
impact.
Is
it
kind
of
diffuses
some
of
that,
because
it
gives
them
some
Liberty
to
do
what
they
need
to
do?
H
I'll
give
you
the
that
I
guess
the
classic
example.
Is
we
just
rezone
this
or
in
the
process
of
resolving
this
to
an
R,
3?
Well,
R
3
is
residential
construction
and
a
school
flat
out?
Isn't
residential
construction
so,
by?
If
you
created
a
campus,
then
they
would
have
different,
liberalized
building
standards,
even
though
they're
abutting
and
a
residential
things
so
there's
ways
to
enhance
their
ability
to
build
buildings
and
change
face,
show
without
dragging
all
the
residents
and
then
into
the
discussion
makes
sense.
Is.
H
A
C
We'll
get
this
squared
up
here,
okay,
so
the
Morris
family
is
the
owner
of
the
property
and
petitioner
submitted
preliminary
plans
on
January
11th,
requesting
approval
of
Morris
addition.
The
adjacent
zoning
designation
is
c3
and
then
proposed
is
also
c3.
Highway
commercial
district,
the
auto
Lots,
meet
the
minimum
requirements
for
the
c3
district.
The
plan
will
create
eight
Lots,
all
in
conformance
with
zoning
requirements,
the
purple
it's
a
proposed
66
foot,
right-of-way
with
which
is
city
standard
and
then
detention
pond
is
required
to
hold
the
two-year
capacity
volume
for
the
Willow
Creek
watershed.
C
D
C
A
K
K
Hang
on
it
bring
up
the
other
one
that
has
has
know
where
you
were,
but
then
bring
in
Morris's
and
then
bring
in
Andres.
You
had
that
one,
oh
okay,
so
I
don't
know
what
you're
looking
for,
because
what
they've
got
is
two
Big
Lots
there
to
the
right
on
the
east
side.
Those
are
actually
going
to
be
sold
to
the
developer
on
the
right.
He
then
is
going
to
be
putting
in
internal
routes.
Inside
this
thing.
Some
of
these
Lots,
you
have
to
realize,
are
four
acres.
They'll.
K
A
K
A
Do
you
you
know
that
was
the
question
we
had
last
time.
It's
like
this
street
lights,
gonna
be
on
23rd.
The
big
question
was:
why
is
it
over
there
who
put
it
over
there
because
the
internal
makings
of
this
hadn't
been
developed
at
that
time,
so
this
street
light
really?
Is
there
isn't
a
street
light
there?
It's
not
and
there's.
K
Still
determinate
Chenoa
street
light
until
the
DLT
comes
in
and
literally
tells
us
where
the
were,
which
corner
warrants
a
street
light
now
I
do
have
to
say
that
when
you
said
we
wanted
to
get
all
three
landowners
together,
we've
done
that
we've
had
conversations
with
the
Co
hole,
people
with
Morris's
and
with
endris
all
in
the
same
conference
call
or
all
sitting
down
at
a
table.
This
is
the
plan
that
they're
working
together.
That
is
really
a
workable
plan.
K
You
know
what
we've
been
focused
on
right
now
is
anything
south
of
8th
Avenue,
which
has
been
the
biggest
part
of
on
the
East
Park
side.
That's
just
going
through
the
planning
process
right
now
with
their
development
agreement,
which
you
guys
I
think
have
looked
at
so
you've
got
that
really
taken
care
of
you
get
to
the
north
side
of
that
taken
care
of
now.
K
K
That
whole
thing
that
that's
all
gonna
be
owned
by
the
one
ownership
he
has.
What
his
plans
are,
what
she's
not
showing
he
doesn't
want
to
be
held
to
that,
but
he
wants
to.
You
know
you
to
understand
that
there
are
internal
roads
going
to
go
there
all
the
water
on
that
side,
they've
actually
declared.
You
know
that
whole
side
he's
worked
it
in
there
into
the
north
across
the
road.
That's
where
the
water
is
going
to
go
for
all
those
lives.
D
K
Yeah,
that's
their
intentions
to
have
internal
rules,
because
there
is
actually
businesses
that
are
looking
at
those
right
now,
rather
large
ones
that
are
looking
they're
going
to
need
to
have
that
access
and
they're
going
to
need
to
have
that
internal
Road
at
some
point
if
they
get
the
property
sold,
there's
just
so
much
so
many
moving
parts
on
thing
right
now
is
kind
of
scary.
We.
K
Me
and
it
goes
to
a
half
Street.
No,
we
don't
want
a
half
Street
right
now.
I
have
an
MoU
that
we're
drawing
up
for
the
addresses
in
the
coho.
There's
a
there's
30
feet
to
the
north
side
of
that
piece
of
property.
If
you
look
where
that
dotted
line
goes
on
on
26
right,
there
see
that
that
actually
is
kind
of
the
question.
One
landowner
says
he
owns
30
feet.
The
other
landowner
says
no
I
own
30
feet.
So
what
I'm
looking
for
is
an
MoU
from
both
of
them.
K
That
says
no
mayor,
it's
okay,
we're
going
to
build
this
road
and
whoever
comes
out
in
the
civil
course
or
wherever
it
goes
then
dedicates
that
to
the
city
of
Watertown.
Another
thing
I
just
want
you
understand
is
that
we've
had
numerous
discussions
with
the
municipal
utilities
on
this
part
and
our
our
plan
is
to
not
have
your
normal
street
lights
and
things
like
that.
This
is
going
to
be
an
upscale
street
lights.
Gonna
have
the
LED
upscale
lights.
K
It
isn't
just
your
normal
flip
over
we're
going
to
have
some
dollars
that
are
we're
going
to
put
into
as
a
city
in
addition
to
the
lights
that
their
utilities
puts
in
for
us.
So
I'm
really
excited
to
see
this
come
in
front
of
you
guys.
This
is
a
process
taken
for
years,
just
to
get
the
Morrises
to
move
forward
and
I
think
it's
a
plan
that
can
be
worked
and,
as
I
said,
there
will
be
internal
roads
even
on
Morris's
to
the
west.
Over
there
they
have.
K
They
have
plans
to
bring
different
type
of
roads
down
into
those
two
lots.
I
think
it's
a
lot
one
in
lot,
two
right
there
they're
working
with
them,
so
there's
different
ideas
that
are
floating
around,
but
we
wanted
to
get
this
plan
together.
To
show
you
that
something's
going
on
and
and
they
want
to
get
those
Lots
sold-
looks.
A
K
A
H
Roads
that
the
mayor's
discussing
it
would
be
remain
private
roads,
they
wouldn't
become
public
roads.
If
they
were
ever
to
become
public
roads,
then
they
would
have
to
revisit
how
our
standards
are,
and
outlets
and
and
part
of
the
issue
is,
let's,
let's
say
they
built
the
private
road
in
here.
It
would
need
to
have
an
outlet
then
somewhere
else,
to
to
have
an
out.
H
But
what
we
have
discussed
with
the
developers
is
that
they
could
do
a
private
road
that
came
in
here
and
maybe
exited
here,
and
that
occupies
two
of
the
entrance.
This
is
that
we
typically
do
discuss
up
these
preliminary
plans.
That's
why
we
have
the
we've
established
similar
to
the
East
Park
addition
as
to
where
what
space
we
desire
to
have
between
all
those
openings
and-
and
you
know
we
want
to
be
able
to
control
access
to
a
certain
extent,
but
you
can't
stranglehold
the
whole
development
area
either.
A
B
H
No
I,
we
wouldn't
accept
the
private
roads.
The
these
are
roads,
I
hate
to
use
examples
in
other
communities
per
se,
but
if
you
can
envision
along
Louie's
Avenue
in
Sioux
Falls
to
the
east,
every
one
of
those
parking
lots
is
tied
together
and
there's
only
like
three
or
four
accesses
that
actually
come
out
onto
the
public
street.
H
We
want
to
them
to
utilize
one
or
one
or
two
of
those
accesses
that
we
we
give
them
and
then,
if
they
want
to
build
internal
roads
between
their
parking
lots
that
you
could
drive
along
the
developed
area
on
private
property,
we're
not
going
to
discourage.
That
is
that
a
little
clearer
example
I
mean
so
we're
still
gonna
restrict
how
many
public
access
points
there
are
it's
just
that
we're
also
going
to
allow
them
to
interchange
their
parking.
Lots
does.