![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/8ZGN276Q7Us/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 04 17 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
E
A
A
A
Second,
by
Mike
any
questions
changes,
hearing,
none,
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
three
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
1712
amending
section,
21.2
3:03
in
chapter
twenty
one
point:
nine:
zero,
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
regarding
the
RG
residential
garage
district.
At
this
time,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
If
there's
an
one
that
wants
to
speak
in
favor
of
or
against.
This
is
your
opportunity.
A
F
E
F
With
the
Planning
Commission,
as
they
look
for
ways
to
enhance
the
availability
of
people
to
park,
the
recreational
vehicles
in
storage
units
off
of
the
city,
streets
and
off
of
side
yards
and
cetera,
so
this
does
only
apply
to
the
RG
residential
garage
district.
They
allowed
the
maximum
size
of
these
structures
to
be
30%
of
the
lot
as
a
maximum.
They
also
increased
the
height
of
the
structures
to
be
allowed
for
a
16-foot
tall
sidewall.
F
Then
they
enhance
the
offset
distance
from
a
side
yard
to
include
an
extra
half
a
foot
of
setback
for
each
additional
foot
above
the
12-foot
height.
So
a
nine
foot
setback
would
be
increased
with
the
new
buildings
and
they
also
included
an
articulated
side
if
the
wall
like
this
exceeds
20
feet.
So
that's
the
highlights
any
questions.
Any.
A
G
A
A
H
Happy
to
mayor,
thank
you.
As
the
council
will
recall,
there
were
two
there
are,
or
were
two
statutes
in
our
state
statutes
that
authorize
the
creation
of
a
Municipal,
Airport
or
one
of
those
statutes
was
eliminated
a
few
years
back
by
the
legislature
for
redundancy.
It
just
so
happened
that
that
was
the
authority
of
the
two
that
we
had
in
our
ordinances.
This
ordinance
would
merely,
as
a
housekeeping
measure,
reinstate
the
proper
statutory
citation
to
Authority.
H
A
Okay,
I
do
have
a
motion,
a
second
on
the
floor
at
this
time.
I
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
five
ordinance
number
1715
amending
section.
Nineteen
point:
zero:
seven
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
to
regulate
personal
conveyances,
including
bicycles.
This
is
a
second
reading.
I,
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion,
motion
by
Mike
sang
by
Brad
and
again
Justin.
If
you,
if
you
will
thank
you
here,
the.
H
Council
will
recall
that
between
the
work
session,
when
this,
this
ordinance
concept
was
first
proposed
and
then
the
first
reading
there
were
concerns
brought
up
about
the
scope
of
the
changes
initially
set
out
at
the
time
it
was
pretty
straightforward.
There
would
simply
be
a
clarification
of
section
1907
o4,
to
ensure
that
you
know
there
wasn't
any
confusion
regarding
any
prohibitions
on
biking
on
sidewalks.
J
H
Such
a
way
that
it
could
endanger
the
rider
themselves
or
others.
So
the
way
this
ordinance
now
reads
is
to
define
what
these
personal
conveyance
azar,
rollerblades,
rollerskates
non
self-propelled
scooters,
meaning
human
propelled,
scooters
and
wheelchairs
electric
wheelchairs,
electric
personal
assistive
devices
which
are
defined
in
state
law
as
Segway
like
devices
and
then
to
essentially
apply
the
existing
regulatory
framework
to
an
expanded
list,
not
just
bicycles,
but
to
all
of
these
personal
conveyance
--is.
One
item
to
point
out,
in
addition
to
that,
is
that.
H
1907
o4
has
added
within
it
the
explicit
prohibition
of
operating
segway
like
devices
those
personal
assistive
devices
on
city
city
sidewalks.
It
turns
out
in
state
law
that
that
is
not
prohibited,
but
state
law
explicitly
allows
municipalities
to
prohibit
them
from
sidewalks.
So
that's
what
this
language
would
do.
If
you
have
any
other
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
them.
Tim.
H
E
J
H
K
It
seems
like
in
their
urban
renewal
district
you've
got
people
coming
out
of
those
businesses,
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
sidewalk
there,
and
it
just
seems
like
in
that
area.
The
two
abreast
thing
should
be
frowned
upon,
I
mean
I
could
be
riding
in
one
of
those
tricycle
things
that's
this
wide,
and
that
could
be
two
abreast.
According
to
this,
you
know
trike
bikes
or
whatever
they
call
them.
H
There
is
that
provision
Marion
councilman,
there's
also
that
reference
in
1907
o-5
has
proposed
that
the
personal
conveyance
shall
not
be
ridden
in
a
manner
that
may
otherwise
cause
injury
to
the
operator
or
other
persons.
It's
sort
of
language
akin
to
what
we
see
with
the
careless
driving
ordinance
for
via
for
motorized
vehicles
on
the
roads.
It's
broader
meant
to
encompass.
You
know
those
sorts
of
situations
really.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
Justin
here,
you're,
not
I,
will
look
for
a
counsel
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
six
ordinance,
number
1707
repealing
section.
Nineteen
point
zero,
four
one:
seven
regulating
parking
in
the
uptown
business
district
within
and
for
the
city
of
Watertown.
This
is
a
second
reading.
I
will
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Beth,
second
by
Randy
Justin.
If
you
will
thank.
H
You
I
won't
belabor.
This
conversation
too
much
on
my
and
here
you'll
recall
that
this
has
been
a
long-running
issue
with
the
downtown
area
that
the
urban
renewal
board
has
taken.
Multiple
looks
at
this
that
the
council
has
taken
multiple
looks
at
this.
This
is
the
latest
iteration
to
come
out
of
the
urban
renewal
board.
H
The
suggestion
from
the
urban
renewal
board
being
laid
out
here
in
my
memo,
essentially
focusing
on
the
enforceability
of
the
two,
our
ordinance
provision,
the
fact
that
there
are
aren't-
and
he
signs
up
denoting
it
anymore,
but
you
know
that's
certainly
something
that
you
know
is
open
to.
Interpretation
is
open
to
the
council's
discussion
here.
The
only
thing
I
would
add
is
that
I'd
ask
you
to
excuse
the
typo
there
at
the
bottom
of
the
memo.
It's
page
one
of
one,
not
one
of
two.
A
Also
encourage
this
body
at
some
point
in
time,
hopefully
in
the
very
near
future,
to
maybe
take
a
look
at
some
of
our
parking
in
our
parking
lots
and,
let's
take
a
look
at
at
least
seen
some
of
these
spaces
to
the
apartment
owners,
where
they
would
have
a
space
where
they
can
go
park
because,
right
now
the
issue
that
I'm
seeing
is
apartment,
folks
that
are
in
the
apartments
are
parking
there
all
day
all
night
and
they
did
they
don't
move
their
vehicle.
This
is
unenforceable
if
we
were
to
have
a
two-hour
parking.
A
We've
tried
it
in
the
past,
but
I
do
think
that
we
should
try
to
encourage
that
we
could
lease
some
parking
to
them
and
to
get
them
off
of
the
off
of
the
main
main
roads
and
in
front
of
the
businesses,
because
it
is
it
it's
frustrating
when
you're
a
business
owner
and
there's
a
vehicle
sitting
there
all
day
long
and
it's
been
there
all
night
long.
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
do
something.
You.
I
Can
look
at
it
a
couple
different
way:
I
mean
not
so
much
for
the
tenants.
I
totally
agree
with
you,
100%
and
in
part
of
that
needs
to
be
done
on
the
educational
site.
I
mean
we
we
need
to.
It
will
identify
the
people
that
have
spent
the
money
to
renovate
the
Uptown
or
the
apartments
up
other
buildings
in
in
lease
amount,
and
we
want
to
encourage
that,
but
we
need
to
identify
those,
so
we
can
get
with
them
and
and
I
do
a
little
education
as
far
as
not
enforcing
this.
I
If
you
look
at
the
two-hour
limit,
if
I
want
to
go
downtown
and
we've
we've
spent
so
much
money
with
with
trying
to
encourage
people
to
come
downtown,
we
did
the
Art
Walk.
We've
did
things
like
that
now,
if
I,
if
I
want
to
bring
some
of
you
downtown,
to
show
them
off
or
downtown
district
and
really
spend
some
time,
I
can't
do
it
in
two
hours,
so
that
limits
me
of
not
being
able
to
come
downtown.
A
E
A
G
In
that
23
years,
I
guess
I've
seen
a
lot.
We
had
the
original
two-hour
parking,
which
I'll
be
honest
with
you,
everybody
hated.
That
was
the
same
thing
that
rooking
says
currently,
which
was
the
if
I
remember
what
five
tell
to
or
somewhere
in
that
area
and
the
no
parking
in
between
all
the
owners
that
I
know
in
the
Uptown
area
agree
that
that
that
overnight,
parking
was
asinine,
that
it
basically
was
for
one
reason:
the
joke
of
get
the
DUI,
and
that
was
it.
It
really
didn't
serve
a
whole
lot
of
purpose.
G
Unfortunately
I
blistered
our
mayor
one
day,
because
a
tenant
of
my
next-door
neighbor
sat
right
in
front
of
my
door
for
five
straight
days
and
I
was
told
there
was
nothing
I
could
do
about
getting
him
out
of
my
doorway
and
what
I
read
in
here
basically
says
you
know.
True,
you
can't
tell
who
a
customer
is
I
mean
I
can
to
a
certain
extent,
because
after
23
years,
I
can
walk
down.
G
Broadway
and
I
can
tell
you
the
16
owners,
employees
and
tenants
that
are
going
to
be
parked
on
Broadway
every
single
day,
they'll
move
for
dinner.
They
may
not
move
for
dinner
and
then
they'll
come
back
and
I
know
you
say
it
causes
disputes.
It's
a
bigger
dispute.
When
I
talked
to
the
owner
he
basically
tells
me
to
kiss
his
posterior
because
he
doesn't
have
to
do
it.
Now
the
biggest
problem
that
we
run
into
in
regard
to
enforcement
Elm.
E
G
I
feel
sorry
for
the
gentleman
sitting
back
here
is
in
the
fact
that
preview
we
did
have
people
that
were
doing
it.
When
I
first
moved
uptown,
we
had
a
gentleman
that
was
coming
around
ticketing.
I
asked
him
how
things
were
going.
He
says:
watch
this,
he
walked
right
out,
walked
up
to
a
specific
vehicle,
told
me
whose
it
was
but
to
take
it
on
it
and
said
now.
G
You
can't
have
exceptions
now
to
me:
I,
don't
care
one
way
or
another,
because
I'm
not
downtown
either
did
in
the
shop,
and
it
doesn't
take
me
two
hours
to
do
anything
and
I,
don't
know
of
any
business.
That
normally
has
the
customer
take
over
two
hours
to
do
business
other
than
maybe
the
little
beauty
shop,
because
I
can't
remember
my
mother
used
to
be
a
beauty
operator
and
it
it
took
longer
to
do
a
die,
a
cut
and
a
perm
or
something
like
that
it
might.
G
The
Monday,
through
Friday
for
most
of
us,
is
not
a
big
deal
as
far
as
to
our
parking
during
the
daytime.
If
you're
looking
at
a
weekend
to
me,
it's
real
difficult
together,
because
the
fact
that
is
when
the
majority
of
the
things
occur,
that
is
the
shows
that
are
downtown.
That's
the
dart
tournaments
of
pool
tournaments
and
the
things
that
you
can't
regulate
within
two
hours
and
Sunday
basically
nobody's
open.
G
G
Right
here
this
is
our
current
one
as
a
business
listed
on
it
and
our
building
is
no
longer
there.
They
weren't
even
in
business
for
two
years
and
I
would
guarantee.
None
of
you
sitting
here
tonight
would
want
to
visit
with
that
business
owner
because
she
was
so
mad
at
the
parking
thing
in
same
situation.
The
day
I
stopped
to
visit
with
her.
It's
like
I
said
what
are
your
problems?
She
said
that
vehicle
that
vehicle
and
that
vehicle
they
sit
here
all
day.
G
My
customers
can't
get
to
my
place
and
if
this
keeps
up
I
quit
and
she
did
and
that's
the
same
problem
that
we
have
throughout
the
Uptown
area
now
I
speak
mostly
in
the
Broadway
north
and
south
and
first
west
to
first
East,
because
I've
seen
that,
like
I
say
for
23
years,
the
only
thing
that
I
would
ask
is
that
you
seriously
seriously
look
at.
Is
this
truly
what
the
uptown
business
people
want,
and
the
only
way
you're
gonna
find
out
is
actually
take
a
take.
A
survey
of
the
people
that
are
up
there.
G
I
know
chief
vitek
did
it.
You
know
back
in
2013,
but
this
is
kind
of
a
misnomer
as
to
what
it
shows,
because
it
says
community
parking,
30%
of
the
people
had
editors
concern
no
parking,
two
to
five
twenty
four
percent
and
only
two-hour
parking
21
percent.
The
community
parking
that
they
were
talking
to
her
about
was
the
fact
that
their
neighbors
were
parking
in
front
of
your
places.
G
So
my
suggestion
is
is
to
please
before
you
actually
implement
this
visit
with
the
owners
uptown
to
make
sure
it's
exactly
what
they
want
and
personally,
if
you
can't
afford
to
do
it,
I'll
do
it
for
free
for
you,
because
my
concern
is
as
a
businessman:
it
loves
the
downtown
area.
I
don't
want
to
see
any
more
businesses
come
and
go.
You
know.
A
G
G
I
A
G
I
I
I
G
A
G
G
G
G
State
moved
to
town
fifteen
years
ago,
I
have
walked
to
work
every
day,
and
two
weeks
ago
my
son
went
on
vacation.
I
ran
the
business
me
and
yet
the
same
two,
ladies,
that
parked
in
the
parking
lot
with
me
back
fifteen
years
ago,
are
the
only
three
people
that
are
parking
in
that
same
city
lot,
which
is
a
sad
state
of
affairs,
because
when
you're
talking
about
a
rental
or
that
of
the
city
parking
lots
for
some
of
the
people.
G
Yes,
the
Uptown
area
does
definitely
need
more
development
when
it
comes
to
the
upper
areas
of
it,
and
there
are
some
people
that
are
willing
to
at
least
invest
money
into
it.
The
only
thing
I
would
say
is
when
I
look
at
the
city
of
Mitchell,
for
example,
the
city
of
Mitchell
over
the
years
have
been
highly
successful
when
it
comes
to
that
development,
and
the
only
reason.
Why
is
every
time
they
get
a
building
that
burns
or
there's
something
wrong
with
it?
The
city
buys
it
and
turns
it
into
a
parking
lot.
G
J
Things
and
I
think
you're
hitting
all
the
points
that
you
know
have
been
discussed
for
the
last
probably
15
years.
You
know
and
I've
been
involved
with
urban
rule
for
10,
so
you
got
five
years
on
me,
but
you
know
I
think
everything's
been
said.
The
same
thing
you
did
I
went
and
talked
to.
J
Or
who
actually
or
whatever
and
girls
I
talked
to
she
was
in
her
70s.
Why
do
you
go
downtown
up
deep,
dining
retail
and
she
has
a
insurance
down
there
and
I
said:
does
parking
where
you
park
cause
you
any
problem
and
she
said
no.
Unless
it's
I
see,
then
she
reschedules
her
appointment
and
if
we
put
parallel
parking
up
there,
she
won't
come
down.
J
Entertainment
and
shopping,
they
said,
have
never
changed
their
mind
about
a
destination
based
on
where
they
have
to
park.
I
spoke
with
a
person,
who's,
a
resident
building
owner
and
landlord.
She
thought
that
this
had
been
done
a
long
time
ago
and
wondered
why
we
were
still
talking
about
it
and
she
said
she
likes
the
feel
of
not
having
limitations
for
people
downtown.
J
Works
fine
for
her,
has
off
street
parking
for
tenant
and
I.
So
I
just
wanted
to
get
a
kind
of
a
cross-section
of
what
people
were
thinking
about.
In
it,
it
wasn't
just
the
people
who
lived
and
worked
there.
I
wanted
to
know
what
people
who
came
downtown
to
shop,
and
so
I
was
starting
to
get
the
sense
that
people
were
willing
to
Park
where
they
needed
to
to
go
where
they
wanted
to
shop,
and
so
I
think
Steve
hit
the
nail
and
they
had
to
about
getting
some
leasing
for
tenants.
J
G
A
A
Okay
believe
I
have
a
motion,
a
second
on
the
floor.
At
this
time,
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
all
right:
number:
seven,
first
reading
ordinance
number
1717
amending
chapter
3.01
to
clarify
the
regulation
of
service
animals,
assistance,
animals,
police
dogs
and
kennels.
This
is
a
first
reading,
I'm
not
going
to
spend
very
much
time
at
all
on
any
of
these
three
that
are
coming
up
or
four.
So
if
you
spent
just
a
short
minute
on
them,
I'll.
H
H
So
not
only
do
we
have
that
page
in
here,
but
we
also
have
all
the
notations
next
to
each
provision
that
was
changed,
so
you
have
comment
bubbles
showing
why
these
were
changed,
making
reference
to
the
authority
as
to
why
it
needed
to
be
changed
in
short,
changed
these
ordinances
to
reflect
federal
statute,
changing
federal
law
with
regard
to
service
animals
and
assistance
animals,
and
we
tried
to
address
issues
with
dog
kennels
and
distinguishing
between
commercial
kennels
versus
plain
old
dog
houses,
less
onerous
regulations
on
plain
old
dog
houses.
So
that's
a
okay.
A
A
H
A
F
A
F
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
my
screen.
Still
up
right.
We
received
a
petition
from
the
owners,
James
K,
Lindsay,
revocable
trust
and
sweet
Properties
LLC,
who
is
an
interested
party.
The
idea
is
that
there
want
to
change
the
zone
from
C
to
commercial,
to
be
rezone
to
r3
multifamily
and
basically
it's
an
expansion
of
the
existing
r3
district
to
the
immediately
to
the
west
of
this
property
that
this
is
a
long
1st,
Avenue
north
east,
near
the
intersection
of
19th,
Street
East
and
again.
This
was
entertained
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
approved
for
your
entertainment.
A
Entertainment
there
you
go
Showtime
alright
number
eleven
repealer
carryover
of
capital
outlay
appropriations
from
the
2016
fiscal
year
resolution
number
1708
Shelly!
Do
you
want
me
to
get
a
motion?
A
second
for
discussion?
Let's
do
that?
Let's
get
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Randy,
second,
by
Don
or
Dan,
okay,
she'll.
D
Thank
you,
Mary
I
also
be
very
brief.
This
is
something
that
comes
before
you
every
year,
as
it
stated
in
here
home
world
Charter
does
allow
for
us
to
carryover
any
capital
budget,
not
any
operating
or
personnel
just
capital
budgets
for
projects
that
are
either
not
completed
or
were
not
started
during
that
budget
year.
D
It
allows
you
to
carry
them
over
for
three
years
or
until
the
project
is
complete,
anything
that
we
don't
carry
over
that
budget
lapses,
and
they
would
have
to
be
rebutted
in
a
future
year
and
there's
just
one
other
I
I,
it's
kind
of
an
accounting,
scriveners
error.
Nobody
would
really
know,
except
for
Connie
when
she
tries
to
put
these
adjustments
in
under
the
26th
Street
East
improvements
line
item.
D
C
A
D
I
I
do,
and
as
far
as
as
far
as
I'm
aware
we're
supposed
to
call
those
out-
and
it's
counsel
that
needs
to
authorize
those
two-
you
know
cuz,
then
they
wouldn't
be
in
the
same
line
item.
They
would
be
reappropriation
other--
line
items
somewhere
in
the
2017
budget.
So
my
understanding
is
that
they're,
either
continuations
or,
for
instance,
like
under
the
capital
improvement
to
12
for
3184
3,100
land.
We
never
really
specified
a
project,
but
any
appraisals,
any
land
purchase
opportunities
are
used
under
this
budget.
D
K
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
Shelley.
On
this
hearing.
None
I
would
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
12
Plateau
the
Morris
first
addition
resolution
number
17,
11
I'm
gonna,
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
and
we'll
have
Shane
go
through
that
so
motion
by
John.
Second,
by
Glen,
okay,
go
ahead.
Shane
Thank.
F
F
The
plan
was
brought,
but
for
the
Planning
Commission
at
their
February
23rd
meeting
that
was
approved
at
that
meeting
was
certain
conditions
which
are
included
in
the
development
agreement,
which
you
will
entertain
after
this
motion,
the
plat
of
the
Mars
first
edition
was
approved
on
April
6
2017
by
said,
Planning
Commission.
The
zoning
is
intended
to
be
C
3
highway
commercial
district
plan
will
create
8
Lots,
in
conformance
with
the
zoning
requirements
for
said,
zoning.
K
Jana
I
do
have
a
question
on
this:
the
access
that
comes
out
to
the
north
on
to
Willow
Creek
Drive
for
the
Lots
that
will
be
to
the
east
of
that.
That
will
be
a
long,
Willow
Creek
Drive.
Will
they
be
allowed
to
have
access
from
Willow
Creek,
or
will
they
need
to
go
on
to
what
is
this
26th?
Well,
they
need
to
go
into
the
development
to
get
to
those
properties.
The.
F
According
to
the
standards
that
we
set
for
our
driveway,
which
there
is
potential
for
a
drive
way
over
to
the
east
of
26th
Street,
because
it
has
the
proper
distance
and
we
would
anticipate
that-
that
may
be
a
shared
driveway
with
between
two
Lots.
But
in
short,
there
is
a
one
axis
that
can
be
allowed
on
lot.
1
in
this
and
off
of
either
street.
A
It
kind
of
depends
also
on
what
goes
in
there,
because
I
know
those
two
Lots
have
been
sold
based
on
this.
So
if
there's
something
that's
going
in
there,
that's
quite
large,
they
may
not
want
ins
and
outs,
and
we
had
to
be
very
careful
because
all
sudden
you're
coming
down
on
that
and
then
you
have
the
curve
the
curve
coming
over
there.
We
need
to
be
very
careful
about
how
we
access
on
to
Willow
Creek
Drive
for
just
safety
reasons.
You
know
that's.
E
A
A
F
That's
correct
and
if
you
look
at
the
drawing
I
have
up
here
now,
this
is
the
proposed
location
of
26th
Street.
It
is
a
long
ways
over
to
the
next
intersection
of
8th
Avenue,
so
we
will
have
to
allow
some
metered
access
points
along
that
this.
Otherwise
it's
just
too
great
a
distance.
Our
anticipation
is
that
they're
gonna
be
typically
about
a
block
apart.
So
you
know
in
that
350
to
400
what
range,
but
what's.
K
A
F
A
K
Think
the
access
is
a
concern
of
mine
on
to
on
to
that
role,
because
there's
getting
to
be
more
and
more
and
more
traffic,
there
I
mean
it's
I
like
to
see
that
that's
what
the
intention
of
that
road
was
in
part,
but
it
is
going
to
present
challenges
in
regards
to
access,
not
so
much
into,
but
out
of
those
properties.
So,
let's.
E
F
These
are
extremely
large
lots.
I
mean
we're
talking
about
a
three
point:
six
five
acre
lot
one.
So
you
know
if
you've
got
one
large
business
in
there,
if
they
have
one
driveway
out
there,
it's
not
like
you
have
fifteen
driveways
coming
in
that
distance.
So
again,
our
plan
is
to
just
meter
those
driveways
out
and
push
them
to
have
combined
driveways,
especially
where
we
can
so.
A
C
J
A
Of
the
things
we
have
to
be
aware
of,
though,
is
that
when
the
original
development
agreement
went
through,
they
did
have
those
numbers
already
in
place
in
the
development
agreement
that
the
city
of
Watertown
agreed
to.
So
we
have
to
be
aware
of
those
things
also
that
they're
on
the
table.
So
if
there's
no
other
questions,
I
believe
we
have
a
motion.
A
second
on
the
floor.
I
will
look
for
council
action.
A
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
13
follows
right,
along
with
it
its
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
development
agreement
for
the
morris.
First,
addition
I
will
entertain
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Randy,
second
by
Beth
Shane.
If
you
will
do
this,
then
for
us
yeah.
F
This
development
agreement
fits
our
pretty
much
our
standard
development
agreements
that
we've
been
doing
on
commercial
properties,
especially
in
this
East
Park
area,
and
it
it
covers
all
of
the
questions
that
were
entertained
at
the
Planning
Commission
and
covers
all
of
our
typical
basis
as
to
who's
paying
for
what
public
infrastructure
etc.
So
I
guess
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
I'm
gonna
have
some
questions.
A
K
K
I
will
tell
you
that
the
bike
trail
along
First,
Avenue
or
Willow
Creek
just
seems
like
I
know
we
use
it
as
a
bike
trail,
but
it
seems
a
little
odd
to
me
that
we
would
go
right
in
front
of
all
these
retail
businesses.
The
bike
trail
and
set
of
sidewalks
and
beside
watches
can
be
used
for
bikes
I'd
like
to
see
us
go
more
to
the
sidewalks
in
these
types
areas
and
to
actually
put
a
bike
trail
out
in
front
of
them.
F
So
so
there's
I
mean
again.
The
preliminary
plan
did
show
sidewalks
along
both
sides
of
the
street
and
I
can't
divulge
too
many
details
at
this
time,
because
it's
just
a
concept
discussion
but
I
have
started
conversations
with
the
developers
in
that
region
to
start
to
identify
where
the
potential
areas
for
extending
the
bike
trail
down
from
Long
Willow
Creek
to
the
South
may
exist,
and
so
we
started
talking
about
that.
F
We
don't
have
anything
concrete
or
defined
at
this
point,
but
it
is
a
goal
of
not
only
myself
but
the
Parks
and
Rec
board
as
well.
To
ultimately
have
the
bike
trail
system
extend
to
the
south
and
wraparound
back
to
the
west
and
connect
back
up
by
the
softball
complex
and
the
the
ANZUS
Sports
Complex.
So
it's
it's.
It's
a
long-range
goal
that
we
have
to
recognize.
The
trail
systems
got
to
be
completed.
One.
A
Of
the
things,
though,
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
aware
of
is
that
when
somebody
puts
inside
walking
for
another
place,
we
expect
them
to
remove
the
snow.
But
yet
on
our
bike
trails,
we
don't
do
anything
so
I
think
we
need
to.
We
need
to
look
at
that
Rob
I'm,
just
saying,
okay,
yeah.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
those
bike
trails
in
certain
areas
out
there
are
open
to
the
public
to
be
walking.
A
C
C
F
We
don't
I
hate
to
say
that
we
don't
have
a
plan,
but
we
don't
have
a
completely
written
out
plan
that
identifies
those
type
of
things
and
I
think
whenever
we
do
a
an
update
for
to
our
Houston
plan
of
our
whole
community.
That
needs
to
be
updated
as
well,
so
in
our
comp
plans
should
should
identify
our
priorities.
F
That
are
part
bike
trails
and
one
thing
that
we've
also
started
discussing
is
the
potential
of
getting
projects
in
marked
for
the
safe
routes
to
schools,
which
would
then
concentrate
in
those
areas
that
are
closest
to
school
districts
and
try
to
utilize
that
kind
of
funds
that
are
available
too.
So
we
are
talking
about
it.
I
can't
just
say
that
I
have
a
specific
plan,
that's
in
place
or
in
motion
yet,
but
we
have
started
to
identify
those
and
we'll
prioritize
just
a.
L
F
A
A
So
if
there's
no
other
questions,
I'll
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
14
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
professional
service
agreement
with
Great
Plains
sponsorship,
sponsorship
to
market
prairie
lakes,
wellness
center
sponsorships
I
tell
you
out,
Ryan
I
want
to
have
you
come
up?
Would
there
probably
a
few
more
questions
but
I'm
going
to
get
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
on
this
matter
and
and
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
before
you
get
going
here?
A
A
That's
where
we're
at
right
now
so
I
do
have
a
motion
by
it
was
it
Randy?
Did
you
Mike
Mike
made
it
I'm
looking
for
a
second,
so
I
have
a
second
by
Bill
for
discussion.
Now,
look
let's
go
ahead
and
let's
talk
about
this
a
little
bit
and
just
see
where
we're
at
and
again
Ryan,
there
probably
be
some
questions
that
come
in
front
of
you,
mayor.
A
Restrictions
do
we
have
there
actually
he's
going
to
be
working
extremely
close
with
prayer
lakes,
if
he's
talking
to
sponsors,
because
they
have
to
give
that
that
okay,
in
order
for
let's
say
he
went
to
mg
mg
T
and
they
wanted
to
give
dollars
that
would
have
to
be
approved
by
prayer
lakes
on
their
site.
Also,.
N
There
we
go
this
works
so
as
far
as
that,
the
two
options
go
in
either
scenario:
I
will
do
an
evaluation
and
an
analysis,
and
you
know
really
kind
of
come
in
and
and
look
at
every
quantitative
benefit,
qualitative
benefit.
All
the
assets
identify
new
assets,
look
at
current
assets
and
then
what
I
do
with
that
is
either
I
go
to
market
with
it
and
I
would
take
that,
and
with
my
you
know,
my
team,
if
I
need
one
which
I'm
not
sure
that
I
would
but
I
would
go
and
execute
sales.
N
Otherwise,
the
first
option
is
giving
that
evaluation
to
you
as
a
city
and
then
between
yourselves
and
prairie
lakes.
You
can
do
with
that
as
you
please.
So
there's
been
a
couple
good
examples
of
where
I've
done,
that
in
the
past,
where,
with
like
the
Washington
pavilion,
Performing
Arts
Center
in
Sioux
Falls,
they
had
the
wherewithal
and
they
had
them
amount
of
employees
to
where
they
could
conduct
the
sales
themselves.
N
So,
instead
of
you
know
paying
my
firm,
what
it
would
cost
to
you
know
have
us
conduct
the
sales
there
was
we
really
kind
of
just
understood.
There
was
no
no
point
in
that
and
they
took
the
valuation
which
I've
kind
of
put
into
color.
In
the
the
page
document
we
talked
about
earlier,
which
comes
out
to
be.
N
You
know,
a
comprehensive
analysis,
a
presentation
that
you
guys
can
actually
kind
of
plug-and-play
and
take
to
businesses
an
inventory
catalog
that
identifies
all
the
assets
you
have
that,
maybe
you
knew
you
had
and
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
that
you
don't
know
you
have
and
how
to
put
together
comprehensive
partnerships
for
regional
companies
and
maximize
the
revenue
to
the
fullest
right.
My.
A
Guess
is
I
would
like
to
see
the
evaluation
and
then,
of
course,
we'll
come
back
and
frankly,
you
know
to
pay
a
commission
for
something
we've
got
something
in
return,
rather
than
no
commission
in
no
sales
I
mean
there's,
there's
a
huge
advantage
for
us
to
do
that.
That
would
be
my
recommendation
that
we
do
on
this
I
think.
K
K
We're
I'm
with
you
is,
is
lets
on
this
first
go-round.
Let's
focus
on
pre-election
wellness.
Let's
get
that
in
see
what
it
looks
like
at
that
point.
Then
Ryan,
we're
gonna,
know
what
you're
suggesting
our
items
or
areas
that
we
can
create
revenue
with
what
their
approximate
value
is
from
your
your
work,
correct,
we're
gonna
know
what
that
total
package
looks
like
yes,.
N
Those
are
things
that
are
proprietary
until
you
say
we
don't
really
need
you.
I
would
give
those
to
you
and
we,
you
know,
you'd,
have
that
intellectual
property
to
say
we're
gonna,
take
this
presentation
and
make
it
our
own,
but
yeah
so
you'll
have
the
tools
to
go
hey.
Can
we
do
this
ourselves
with
this
evaluation
and
what
he's
going
to
provide
us
or
is
it
something?
It
seems
like
it's
a
little
more
comprehensive
than
you
want,
underneath
you.
K
I
N
Know
that's
what
they
specialize
in
so
and
just
in
transparency.
That's
that's!
You
know
in
Sioux,
Falls
and
in
other
cities.
That's
the
way
that
they've
done.
It
is
kind
of.
Let
us
look
at
it.
Let
us
discuss
it,
whether
with
me
or
internally
and
I,
think
the
good
news
is
we
operate
on
good
faith
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
these
other
cities
would
attest
that.
M
M
K
N
Also,
it's
so
in
in
in
the
industry
whether
this
matter
might
matter
to
you
it's
a
valuation
or
a
valuation,
it's
kind
of
all
of
the
above.
So
it's
an
evaluation
of
the
market,
it's
a
valuation
of
assets
and
then
it's
an
analysis
of
so
you
could
take
all
that
and
put
it
into
one
word
or
use
them
all
cover.
M
H
Understanding
is
that
option
a
is
essentially
what
we
are,
what
what
is
being
discussed
right
now,
and
so
in
terms
of
embellishing
any
additional
terms
to
it.
If
you're
content
with
the
terms
is
provided
here,
this
proposal
is
effectively
in
legal
parlance,
a
term
sheet
which,
if
you
feel
that
these
are
the
necessary
terms
as
presented
to
you,
then
we
can.
H
You
can
authorize
the
mayor
to
sign
an
agreement
that
incorporates
those
terms,
and
that
would
then
permit
us
to
be
able
to
produce
a
contract
and
have
it
signed
with
the
terms
that
the
council
has
authorized.
That
would
be
in
keeping
with
SDC
l
9
5
1
5,
as
you
have
provided
the
terms
for
the
contract
and
have
authorized
the
mayor
to
sign
that
contract
with
those
terms.
So.
A
L
H
We
would
need
to
have
that
agreement.
That's
right.
We
would
need
to
have
the
agreement
and
then
get
it
signed
and
then
once
it's
signed,
then
he
can
hit
the
ground
running
doesn't
have
to
come
back
to
us
another.
No,
no,
it
does
not
so
long
as
that
agreement
encapsulate
s--
option
a
it
can
be
signed
a
and
as
long
as
the
Council
of
Greece
to
those
terms
in
option
a
as
depicted
Oh
any.
L
And
now
my
comment:
I
want
to
apologize
to
my
colleagues
and
to
Justin
and
to
the
mayor
and
Ryan
that
this
this
moved
awfully
fast
from
last
Tuesday
evening
about
seven
o'clock
had
to
get
things
to
Shelly
or
wherever
the
whoever
puts
the
agenda
together
so
that
there
were
some
moving
pieces
there.
That
probably
didn't
quite
come
together
way.
Should've
and
I'll
take
full
responsibility
for
that.
In
light
of
how
the
whole
process
moved
within
the
last
few
days,
I
hope
we're
on
the
right
track.
L
Iii
like
what
I'm
hearing
but
now
I
do
have
a
question
for
you
Ryan.
Okay,
these
are
professional
services.
We
don't
have
to
go
out
for
bid
on
that.
I
understand
that,
but
normally
we
would
probably
put
an
RFP
out
and
see
you
know
who
else
is
out
there
in
the
industry
that
do
the
same
sort
of
work.
Tell
us
why
we
why
we
were
comfortable?
Why
we
don't
have
to
do
that
or
why
you
don't
think
we
have
to
go
down
their
route
and
contract
with
you
right
now.
N
N
All
great
plain
sponsorships
does
is
sponsorships
and
naming
rights
the
firms
that
you
would
find
that
also
do
that
are
companies
such
as
van
Wagner,
Learfield
and
legends,
my
predecessor,
the
company
that
I
used
to
work
for,
and
they
are
more
focused
on
NFL
stadiums,
NHL
stadiums,
MLB
stadiums,
international
soccer
and
so
as
I
was
coming
away
from
my
former
company.
What
I
was
finding
is
they
were
actually
turning
down.
What
I
thought
were
big
projects
in
Sioux
Falls,
not
because
they
didn't
like
Sioux
Falls
or
anything
like
that.
N
They're
just
quote-unquote
wasn't
enough
meat
on
the
bone
so,
as
I
saw
them
starting
to
stray
away
from
projects
such
as
the
Aquatic
Center.
That
was
a
twisting
and
arm
to
get
them
to
do
that,
even
though
it
became
out
to
be
a
great
thing.
There
were
a
lot
of
other
projects
that
came
along
that
they
just
they
didn't
have
the
time
or
the
capacity
they
felt
to
do
that
worth
the
dollar.
N
So
that's
the
main
reason,
but
the
other
I
would
say
is
that
if
you,
if
you
did
go
out
for
for
RFP
what'll,
come
back,
is
potentially
marketing
companies
that
have
the
capabilities
to
do
amazing
things
such
as
websites
and
graphic
design,
but
they've
never
done
sponsorships
and
they'll
throw
their
name
in
the
ring,
and
they
wouldn't
know
how
to
price
it.
They
have
no
experience
in
it
and
it's
it's
really
kind
of
getting
there
they're
they're
getting
way
out
of
there.
N
It'd
be
like
me
trying
to
sit
here,
and
let
you
guys
to
let
me
do
search
engine
optimization
for
you
I
I,
wouldn't
it
would
come
out
terrible,
so
you
know
it.
We
only.
We
only
specialize
in
one
thing
and
we're
the
only
company
I
believe
in
any
state
that
borders
this
state.
That
does
that.
So
that's
that's!
Where
I
would
go
and
I'd
encourage
you
to
do
research
that
will
testify
to
that.
So,
okay.
A
M
A
Number
15
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
an
agreement
with
Mike
Sheehan
doing
business
as
Drive
by
signs
for
a
permit
to
Maine
a
bill
to
maintain
a
billboard
on
city
property.
At
this
time,
I'll
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Don,
second
by
Beth
Justin.
If
you
want
to
do
this
for
me,.
H
H
H
Prior
to
that,
it
had
been
a
part
of
D
M&E
right-of-way,
and
it
is
somewhere
in
that
milieu
of
ownership
with
the
D
M&E
that
in
talking
with
Mike
Sheehan,
the
sign
had
been
placed
up
there
and
it
was
mr.
Cheyenne's
understanding
that
that
sign
had
been
placed
up
there
lawfully
earlier.
You
know
per
contract
with
D
m
and
E.
H
He
explained
to
me
that
there
was,
at
the
time,
discussions
with
DME
to
purchase
that
land
and
somehow
the
sign
had
been
put
up
there,
but
none
of
the
ownership
in
indices
of
ownership
had
ever
been
vested
in
in
she
hands
billboard
company.
So
all
that
is
laid
out
here
in
the
whereas
clauses
in
the
agreement
before
you
and
basically
it's
a
question
of
what
to
do
going
forward.
The
agreement
as
it
stands
and
I
would
note
that
the
first
paragraph
there
should
be
changed
over
to
Mike
Sheehan,
as
opposed
to
his
son.
H
What
this
lays
out
is
that
licensee
is
to
maintain
a
sign
for
the
benefit
of
the
city
that
advertises
a
city
department,
advertises
something
of
city,
the
city
of
Watertown
interests,
be
it
a
PSA,
or
what
have
you
on
that
billboard
and
for
then,
the
next
five
years,
with
an
option
for
mr.
Sheehan
to
renew
for
another
five
years.
That
sign
must
be
maintained,
must
be
to
code,
must
have
all
utilities
and
maintenance
paid
for
by
Shi
hands
operation
and
the
city
gets
to
sign
off
on
what
gets
placed
up
there.
H
The
city
in
response
would
provide
a
permit
effectively.
This
agreement
saying
you
can
have
this
billboard
on
city
property.
The
city
warrants
that
it
will
allow
a
period
of
60
days
for
sheehan's
to
replace
any
defective
signage,
and
the
city
would
then
allow
for
sheehan's
company
to
access
the
sign
on
a
limited
basis
to
be
able
to
make
those
improvements
or
to
make
those
maintenance
to
maintain
the
sign.
H
Also,
the
city
would
waive
then
any
claim-
and
that's
not
saying
that
we
have,
when
I,
haven't
thoroughly
researched
this
this
sufficiently,
but
would
be
happy
to
that
that
we
would
have
a
claim
against
Sheehan's
for
the
sign
being
on
our
property.
For
the
last
13
years,
almost
14
I
mentioned
the
term.
The
right
of
termination
is
vested
in
Shi
hands
whenever
he
so
chooses,
but
he
then
must
remove
the
sign.
Whenever
this
contract
is
terminated,
he
would
have
to
remove
this
sign.
The
city
may
terminate
only
upon
breach
that
isn't
cured
within
30
days.
H
K
H
K
M
M
H
I,
initially
in
in
talking
with
mr.
Sheehan
I,
had
provided
a
template
whereby
he
would
be
able
to
essentially
spell
out
the
sigh
well
that
there
would
have
to
be
certain
dimensions
of
sign
placed
up
there
and
in
saying
that
he
wanted
that
to
be
removed.
He
said
essentially
what
you're
saying
that
it
would
be
at
least
one
of
the
signs
on
the
billboard.
A
A
I
K
A
B
A
M
A
A
So
that
it
it
shows,
one
of
four
panels
is
for
the
city
of
Watertown
and
Beth
will
second,
that
any
further
discussion
hearing,
none
I
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
16
consideration
of
bids
received
for
the
2017
sidewalk
accessibility,
improvement
project.
I
will
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion,
where's,
my
mic.
Second,
by
Beth
Shane,
you
wanna
show
second
one
sure.
F
This
is
our
annual
accessibility
improvements
project.
We
did
receive
bids
on
April,
6,
2017
I
won't
claim
it's
a
record
number,
but
seven
bidders
is
the
highest
number
of
bidders
on
this
sidewalk
project.
In
the
near
history
of
it
we
did
receive
the
low
bid
from
artistic,
concrete
LLC
of
water
tone
and
a
low
bid
amount
was
one
hundred
ninety
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
$1.50,
which
was
18%
lower
than
the
engineer's
estimate
of
two
hundred
and
forty
four
thousand
seven
hundred
and
twenty
five
dollars.
The
other
bids
ranged
from
two
hundred
and
seventeen
thousand
nine.
F
Seventy
three
to
I
have
a
typo
there,
three
hundred
and
twelve
785,
so
a
good
spread
on
the
bids.
A
portion
of
the
work
is
intended
to
be
paid
by
the
parks
department.
Approximately
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
is
part,
the
parks
portion
and
the
remainder
174
thousand
seven.
Fifty
five
is
the
street
department's
budget.
F
A
F
M
F
No
yes,
a
little
bit,
not
so
much
prices,
but
we
had
to
take
out
more
curb
to
make
the
ramps
more.
In
other
words,
the
ramp
cutouts
weren't
good
enough
on
the
curbside.
So
we
had
to
add
extra
curb
to
do
the
ramps
correctly.
We've
identified
that
issue
and
corrected
that
through
this
plan,
so
we
won't
have
that
issue
on
this
project,
so
should
be
good.
F
We
have
enough
budget,
we
do
carry
over
a
little
bit
annually
when
we
can,
because
we
don't
use
up
all
of
our
money
in
our
co-op
project
where
we,
you
know,
we
have
that
cost
share
with
the
private
citizens.
So
we
do
carry
that
over
and
make
sure
that
we
use
that
money
on
the
next
ad
a
ramp
project.
So
that's
where
we're
at.
Thank
you
for
the
question.
A
Ok,
so
I
do
have
a
motion,
a
second
on
the
floor.
I'll
look
for
council
action
on
this
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
I'd
like
to
go
step
back
just
one
little
bit
on
the
number
14
for
the
the
service
Green
Earth
Great,
Plains
Shelly.
We
have
talked
to
about
this
the
dollars
where
they're
coming
from
on
this,
because
it
wasn't
a
budgeted
item.
Where
is
the
suggestion
to
come
from
I.
A
Tag
yeah
very
good,
okay,
I
know,
I
knew
we
had
talked
about
I
just
couldn't
bring
that
up.
Okay,
any
old
business
that
we
need
to
discuss
before
we
go
too
far.
I
would
like
to
express
my
condolences
to
the
the
Jim
Christianson
family
Jim,
passed
away
here
last
week,
very
unexpectedly,
and
we're
gonna
miss
him
dearly
here
at
City
Hall,
any
other
old
business
I.
I
A
H
H
So
as
it
stands,
we
will
be
having
a
second
public
meeting.
This
Thursday
6:00
p.m.
second
floor
City
Hall.
There
is
talk
of
potentially
having
a
third
public
meeting
as
well
as
well
as
a
tour
of
the
community
with
stakeholders
and
interested
members
of
the
public
to
actually
go
out
and
see
some
of
these
more
trafficked
areas
where
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
more
more
signs
of
various
types
to
get
a
better
handle
visually
on
what
maybe
needs
to
be
modified.
I
A
A
F
Have
one
item
I
put
a
letter
on
your
each
of
your
positions
prior
to
the
meeting,
and
it
is
the
status
update
for
the
drainage
way
in
Eastwood's
neighborhood.
That
letter
is
going
to
go
out
to
the
public
that
live
in
that
neighborhood,
as
their
update,
so
just
wanted
to
be
clear
on
that.
I
was
requested
by
Councilman
Roby
to
make
sure
that
got
done.
So
this
is
what's
going
out
to
the
public.
C
I
just
have
the
one
thing
about
the
airport:
here
they
got
a
nice
email
from
a
couple
today
that
had
just
used
the
airport.
Everything
went
great
for
them.
She
did
say
there
was
a
concern
by
some
people
that
were
on
that
same
air
flight
because
they
hadn't
used
Expedia,
and
she
said
if
you
use
Expedia,
you
don't
have
to
pick
up
your
own
luggage
and
move
it
to
the
next
airport.
And
if
you
don't,
then
you
have
to
pick
up
your
luggage
and
go
back
through
again
to
your
destination.
C
A
Working
great,
you
know
and
I
think
that
yeah
they
didn't
drag
anybody
yeah,
but
I
do
think
that
Expedia,
Travelocity
and
Orbitz
all
are
the
same
way.
If
you
use
any
of
them,
it
get
it.
You
will
not
have
to
handle
your
luggage,
anything
else,
any
new
business
that
would
need
to
discuss,
and
he
lays
on
member
reports
that
anybody
wants
to
share.
What's
up
Bob
new
business.
A
Are
you
okay
with
that?
Is
it
I
mean
it's
got
to
be
really
quick
because
we
got
to
go
into
executive
session.
Here
too,
it's
gonna
be
ten
o'clock.
Okay,
I'll
give
you.
G
Two
and
a
half
okay
and
what
it
is
I
had
visited
with
Shelly
quite
some
time
ago.
In
regard
to
where
we
stand
in
regard
to
open
government
within
the
city
of
Watertown
and
when
I
got
to
reviewing
Watertown
versus
the
other
four
cities
I
found
out,
we
were
a
little
bit
short
in
regard
to
one
area
within
our
open
government
and
that
begins
with
elections.
So
what
I
did
is
I
visited
with
the
city
of
Brookings?
They
helped
me
put
something
together
talk
with
the
Secretary
of
State.
G
They
suggested
that
I
come
in
and
visit
with.
You
folks
directly
asked
for
one
councilmember
to
go
ahead
and
take
the
paperwork
that
I
have
here
in
my
hand
and
present
it
back
for
adoption
and
that's
up
to
you
to
go
ahead.
If
you
wish
to,
if
you're,
not,
then
we'll
basically
know
it
and
what
it
basically
reads.
G
This
ordinance
number
left
that
open
for
discussion
and
ordinance
establishing
requirements
for
campaign
financing
disclosures
for
candidates
for
mayor
and
councilmembers
positions
in
the
city
of
Watertown,
South
Dakota,
with
that
as
the
ordinance
guidelines
and
all
the
associated
paperwork,
all
you
do
is
plug
in
the
ordinance
number
we're
applicable
and
the
city
of
Watertown
is
ready
to
go
now.
I
know
with
the
way
things
are
with
the
reading
bases
and
stuff
like
that.
It's
far
too
late
right
now
for
the
current
election.
A
Thanks
Bob,
okay,
any
of
any
leads
on
member
reports.
I
do
need
to
go
into
executive
session.
This
is
for
contract
negotiations.
I
believe
there
will
be
action
taken
after
this,
so
I
need
a
motion,
a
second
to
go
into
exec,
most
by
john
ii
by
a
bill,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries.
We
are
in
exec
session.