![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/s3pboKv8W7Y/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 03 08 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
C
B
Agenda,
so
what
you
guys
have
in
front
that
I
present
it
to
you
is
for
agenda
item
number:
six,
the
plat
of
lots,
28
a
and
28
B
and
black
two
of
Hidden
Valley
addition
that
plat
has
changed
since
your
agenda
packets
were
sent
out
and
then
also
for
agenda
item
7
for
the
plat
of
Flyway.
First
edition.
That
plat
has
also
changed.
B
A
B
B
The
background
to
this
application
is
the
applicant
and
owners
of
the
real
property
are
the
are
the
owners
of
both
properties
abutting
each
side
of
2nd
Street
East,
who
have
submitted
a
petition,
a
petition
to
vacate
that
portion
of
a
public
street
right-of-way?
The
petition
was
submitted
because
of
the
public
safety
concerns
of
children
crossing
the
street
from
the
school
to
the
playground
and
for
future
building
part
building
and
parking
lot
expansion.
An
image
of
that
future
expansion
plan
is
attached
in
the
agenda
packet.
B
This
is
the
exhibit
that
was
submitted
for
the
vacation
application,
and
then
this
is
the
site
plan
for
future
expansion.
If
this
vacation
goes
through,
the
engineering
department
has
reached
out
to
Watertown
municipal
utilities
as
well
as
private
utility
companies,
and
there
are
no
utilities
residing
under
this
portion
of
2nd
Street
East.
This
includes
gas,
water
and
sanitary
sewer,
meaning
there
will
be
no
need
to
retain
a
utility
easement
over
the
proposed
vacated
right
away.
B
B
If
the
vacation
is
approved
after
publication
and
the
20
day
waiting
period
for
recording,
if
approved
by
plan,
commission
and
city
council
responsibility
of
the
vacated
portion
of
public
right-of-way,
it
will
then
return
to
the
parent
parcel
being
the
adjacent
platted
property
of
those
portions
of
2nd
Street
East
and
will
become
private
property
on
April
13th
2018,
which
would
be
back
to
the
property
owned
by
a
st.
Martin's,
Church
and
school.
B
B
Yeah,
otherwise,
just
in
that
request
for
action,
it
just
gives
the
setbacks
and
whatnot,
which
will
be
important
when
it
comes
time
if
they
do
if
they
are
able
to
do
their
expansion
recommendations.
City
staff
supports
plan
commission
recommending
resolution
number
twenty
1804,
which
is
the
vacation
of
the
public
right-of-way
as
presented
to
City
Council.
B
A
E
A
F
F
E
G
Would
probably
come
with
approval
of
their
final
plan.
H
I'm
Gary
Simonson
I'm
on
the
planning,
Billie
Committee,
that
we
have
for
st.
Martin's
just
a
little
history.
We
have
been
20
with
the
fact
of
the
early
childhood
expansion
project
and
we
went
to
the
city
with
different
options
and
they
actually
came
back
to
us
saying
that
it
would
be
beneficial
to
vacate
the
street
for
giving
reasons
to
your
question.
Has
there
been
a
study
on
the
traffic
I?
Don't
know
if
there's
anything
on
the
record,
but
I
know
last
year
when
we
first
bought
this
to
some
people
in
the
city.
H
They,
the
police
department,
went
up
there
and
did
the
counter
thing
across
there.
I
don't
know
what
the
outcome
was
on
it,
but
they
did
do
that
so
I'm
uncertain
of
that
as
far
as
breaking
ground.
Our
plan
would
be
that
this
year
we
would
like
to
do
the
parking
lot
end
of
it
and
that
way,
when
we
do
the
parking
lot,
we
can
have
that
all
in
place
prior
to
building
the
building.
That
way,
we're
not
obstructing
you
know
our
every
day
or
every
year
activity
of
the
classroom.
H
F
H
With
the
parking
lot
of
it,
basically,
we
would
probably
take
where
the
school
is
or
where
the
expansion
we
haven't
totally
made
a
decision
on
that.
But
we
wanted
to
keep
the
approach
to
the
south
and
we
would
gate
that
off
when
we
vacate
it
to
close
that
road.
But
we
wanted
to
keep
that
Road
in
there
for
the
when
we
do
the
building
of
the
school.
H
So
we
could
use
that
for
a
construction
entrance
in
and
out
of
there
without
having
to
come
through
our
new
parking
lot,
and
so
we
would
probably
gate
off
on
Highland
Boulevard
to
close
it.
And
then,
when
we
do
the
construction,
that's
what
we
are
construction
equipment
coming
in
and
out
and
then
we
can
put
our
rock
base
so
we're
not
tracking
on
there
and
then
at
the
time
of
the
construction.
Then
we
would
tear
that
all
out
and
finish
the
south
end.
H
E
H
Basically,
when
I
met
with
our
principal,
we
met
with
the
police
department,
Fire
Department
and
everybody
had
hand
on
that.
We
talked
about
different
things
with
traffic
of
what
it
would
affect,
and
basically
the
main
corridor
like
the
fire
department.
They
had
made
the
comment
if
they're
gonna
go
up
to
any
place
on
a
fire
and
they're
gonna
chase
up,
probably
maple
or
81,
and
then
go
across
the
traffic
that
comes
down
second
Street
and
I.
H
Think
our
people
in
the
school
could
contend
to
that
also,
and
there
was
also
a
gentleman
that
lives
on
second
to
the
south.
A
lot
of
people
will
come
if
they're
coming
from
the
north.
They
turn
on
12
just
to
stay
out
of
the
school
zone,
so
the
traffic
that
goes
through
there
is
probably
very
minimal,
except
for
our
own
school
Church
traffic.
H
I
H
A
A
grid
of
streets
that
go
in
block
patterns
and
I'm,
not
particularly
in
favor
of
closing
any
of
those
we
had
a
similar
request
from
Makka
Concepcion
school
back
in
89,
and
they
use
the
same
argument
that
children
going
across
the
street
back
and
forth.
It
was
a
hazard
and
stuff
like
that,
and
at
that
time
that
was
denied
and
200
maple
place.
A
H
H
The
church
is
on
one
side,
the
schools,
on
the
other,
that's
kind
of
the
way
it
was
in
the
same
with
two
hundred
maple
place
and
Jenkins
I
mean
it's
kind
of
two
hundred
two
different
entities
and
and
and
things
like
that,
if
we
were
to
put
our
early
childhood
across
the
road
which
we
have
talked
about,
the
problem
that
we
have
is
that
we
have
situations
with
lunch
there.
They
would
have
to
come
back
to
our
main
building
for
activities
like
that.
H
The
gym
is
over
there,
so
we
would
increase
our
traffic
of
children
coming
across
the
road
and
what
would
that
make
it
dangerous?
We
had
also
had
plans
of
going
to
the
salt
and
we
and
we
could
put
to
that,
but
it
wouldn't
it's
not
there's
not
enough
room
to
do
what
we
need
to
do
on
that.
South
side
can.
C
H
F
J
J
Proposal
like
this
is
presented
again,
we
contact
the
next
turn.
You
know
the
genial
adjacent
landowners
well,
in
this
particular
case,
there's
many
people
that
perhaps
utilize
the
street
that
aren't
necessarily
adjacent
landowners.
That
may
have
a
major
objection
to
closing
off
this
street.
Would
you
agree
with
that.
H
I'm
around
there,
quite
a
bit
and
and
obviously
I
didn't,
have
the
Colorado
I
wish
that
we
had
those
results
of
that
when
the
police
department
did
put
that
down
there,
but
I
guess
in
my
mind,
if
there
would
have
been
a
problem,
I
think
they
would
have
presented
it
to
us
at
that
time,
but
it
it's
quite
minimal
under
traffic
and
the
letters
that
Brandi
sent
out
to
adjacent
land
holders.
If
you
look
at
that,
most
of
them
are
all
to
the
north
of
that.
H
H
G
F
G
G
H
K
H
G
H
Could
just
make
one
closing
comment:
go
ahead,
we've
had
the
architect,
do
some
extensive
work
on
this
and
we
met
with
the
city
several
times
with
the
engineer
and
and
many
people
at
large,
the
mayor
and
I
think
most
important
people
that
I
can
think
of,
and
we
would
not
have
proceeded
with
the
$35,000
worth
of
architectural
study
that
we
have
done
if
we
weren't
half
way
confident
that
this
could
happen.
That
I
mean
we
felt
like
we
had
the
city's
blessing
to
do
this.
H
F
That
would
be
my
comment
is
that
I
know
people
go
out
and
if
you
were
misled
to
believe
that
you
need
to
have
full-blown
concept
as
bill
type
design.
Work
done
on
your
building
to
prove
your
point,
whether
or
not
I
hope
that's
not
the
case,
because
in
this
situation,
just
knowing
that
weird
this
all
you
would
have
had
it
done
is
put
a
square
on
a
on
a
napkin
showing
that
this
is
what
we
plan
on
doing
for
my
purposes.
F
H
A
K
K
We
have
emergency
medical
stuff.
That's
got
to
get
through.
You
know,
everybody
comes
straight
up,
2nd
Street,
it's
not
that
they
come
go
around
everything
and
the
ones
that
use
the
north
side
of
2nd
Street
do
not
go
out
the
14th
they
go
down.
South
okay,
so
I
mean
I,
don't
know
why
everybody
thinks
they
can
do
just
whatever
they
want,
just
because
it
appeases
them
at
that
time.
You
know
we
have
to
abide
by
all
the
city
rules.
K
K
K
A
K
For
emergency
vehicles
and
whatnot,
we've
had
emergencies
on
the
road
and
they
come
up.
Second,
they
don't
always
go
all
the
way
around
I
mean
that's
wasting
time.
I
had
a
neighbor
that
died
and
it
mattered
whether
he
got
to
the
hospital
on
time
or
not.
He
had
a
blood
clot
and
they
were
there
and
they
did
come
up
second,
so
you
can't
I
mean
it
wasn't
that
that's
why
he
died,
but
because
the
blood
clot
went
right
to
his
heart,
but
you
know
that
that's
why
I'm
saying
the
emergency
vehicles
do
come
up.
L
Sara
Karen
mayor
normally
I
would
be
pretty
opposed
to
something
like
this
and
I
I'm
sure
you
all
notice
the
staff
recommended
approval
of
this
and
that
didn't
come
easily.
There
were
numerous
meetings
I
did
meet
with
the
church.
They
had
several
different
layouts
that
they
proposed
trying
to
make
this
safe
and,
as
an
engineer
working
for
the
city
of
Watertown
I
received
numerous
requests
throughout
the
years
for
a
mid-block
crosswalk
yep
in
in
this
block,
so
that
they
could
get
their
kids
safely
across
the
street
and
those
were
denied.
L
We
don't
like
to
give
mid-block
crosswalks,
because
cars
aren't
looking
for
a
crosswalk
in
the
middle
of
the
block.
This
case
is
a
little
different
in
some
respects,
because
second
Street
dead
ends
at
14th
and
then
it
does
not
go
all
the
way
through
it.
It
stops
and
jogs
over
at
another
collector
out
to
the
south,
so
it
isn't
a
major
thoroughfare.
However,
it's
very
close
to
several
collectors,
east-west
and
north-south.
L
So
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
grid,
the
emergency
personnel
that
looked
at
this
did
not
feel
that
2nd
Street
would
be
used
for
an
emergency
vehicle.
Going
anywhere,
but
this
block
they
would
be
coming
from
the
south,
they
take
maple.
They
would
not
take
second
street
because
you
have
to
jog
around
a
couple
times
to
get
to
it,
so
the
staff
felt
fairly
comfortable
that
safety
was
not
compromised
in
any
way.
L
That's
a
big
deal,
however,
to
get
access
to
a
different
layout
for
them
that
worked
for
them
being
that
they
own
most
of
both
sides,
and
maybe
all
of
it
now
was
going
to
be
challenging
with
that
road
in
the
way.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
it
wasn't
with
careless
consideration
that
the
staff
recommended
Ruvo,
that
they
did
look
at
the
circulation
and
safety
routes.
Also,
the
city
owns
this
road
and
is
responsible
to
replace
the
asphalt
every
20-30
years,
overlay
it
every
seven
years
or
so
put
chip
seal
down.
L
We
remove
the
snow
on
it.
We
keep
the
curbs
and
gutters
up
and
so
I
don't
think
it's
a
loss
to
the
city
to
take
this
right-of-way,
which
doesn't
have
any
utilities
in
it,
which
primarily
serves
the
church
and
vacate
it
back
to
the
parent
parcels,
which
are
the
property
on
either
side.
In
this
particular
case,
I
can't
say:
that's
been
true
on
the
other
examples
which
were
given,
and
it
is
unusual
to
vacate
an
improved
Road,
but
we
did
it
on
Broadway
for
similar
reasons
that
the
overall
benefit
was
the
same.
L
They
want
to
expand
their
church.
That
means
more
traffic,
not
less
so
I
know
you
have
a
really
hard
decision
to
make
and
I'm
sure.
Whatever
you
decision,
whatever
decision
that
you
make
will
be
appropriate
and
and
I
get
the
uncomfortable
position
you're
in
in
this
situation,
but
it
isn't
one-sided
and
I.
Don't
want
you
to
think
that
there
wasn't
a
great
deal
of
thought
that
went
into
this.
I
Good
afternoon
I'm
Jeremy
Holman
I
serve
as
Board
of
Education
chairman
at
st.
Martin's
School.
Just
for
some
perspective.
I
wanted
to
add
that
our
school
Stern
at
this
time
has
147
students
and
the
addition
that
we're
proposing
would
add
another
60
students
early
childhood
care,
there's
already
a
lack
of
parking
in
that
neighborhood
for
school
and
church
and
I
also
want
to
make
one
comment
for
public
service.
We
do
offer
an
education
to
the
community
and
not
all
of
the
students
that
attend.
A
I
M
M
It
was
moved
across
the
street
because
we
have
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
students
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
space
down
there
for
playground
area,
and
so
that's
why
the
playground
was
moved
across
the
street
to
take
advantage
of
the
green
space.
That's
over
there
to
be
able
to
use
that
we
realized.
Of
course,
we
would
be
having
across
the
street
to
do
that
and
so
on,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
there
was
enough
space
so
that
the
students
would
be
able
to
play
safely
when
they
went
out
for
recess.
M
You
have
cars
parked
up
and
down
both
sides
of
the
street
for
drop-off
and
pickup,
and
it's
very
difficult
for
parents
to
see
children,
even
as
we
as
teachers
are
out
there,
helping
them
cross
coming
into
those
crosswalks,
and
so
it
makes
it
difficult
with
drop-off
and
pickup
and
with
the
parking
lot
that's
being
proposed
to
be
put
in
this
summer.
That
would
eliminate
that
problem.
M
We've
worked
with
the
architect
to
set
it
up
so
that
the
students
would
be
able
to
be
safely
picked
up
both
by
the
bus
and
by
parents
as
they
come
in
and
that's
been
an
issue
also.
The
street
gets
so
crowded
at
times
it's
very
difficult
for
the
bus
to
even
sometimes
be
able
to
pull
in
and
pick
up
students
and
drop
them
off
both
in
the
morning
and
in
the
afternoon,
and
just
wanted
to
reiterate
what
mr.
Holman
said
as
well.
You
asked
about
a
benefit.
M
We
do
provide
an
education
to
the
community
currently
about.
15%
of
our
students
are
not
members
of
st.
Martin's.
If
you
look
at
the
preschool,
it's
an
even
higher
number
that
are
not
members
of
st.
Martin's
and
with
the
addition
of
the
preschool
that
would
increase
the
number
of
members
of
the
community
that
would
be
making
use
of
the
school.
So
with
this
addition,
we
would
have
even
more
members
of
the
community
benefiting
from
this.
G
John
I'll
I'll
say
a
few
words
the
mirror
summarized
it
pretty
well,
the
staff
did
meet
with
church
folks
on
several
occasions.
We
did
discuss
just
for
full
disclosure,
I
mean
besides,
we
discussed
other
options.
Besides
vacation,
we
talked
about
rerouting
2nd
Street
through
their
property
and
and
then
that
would
come
out
over
along
the
alley.
That's
adjacent
to
the
east
side
of
the
property.
G
So
we
did
talk
about
rerouting
2nd
Street
we've
talked
about
vacation,
it
was
ultimately
where
that
landed,
but
Fire
and
Police
Department
was
both
involved
in
that
engineering
and
I'm
a
you
know.
The
former
mayor
was
part
of
that
discussion
originally
and
then
subsequently,
mayor
Karen
was
brought
into
the
discussion
in
her
term
as
well.
So
we
we
didn't
gravitate
to
the
vacation
as
the
first
idea,
but
ultimately
decided
that
the
benefit
may
be
apparent
for
this
section
of
the
roadway
primary
use
was
identified
as
the
school
I
did.
G
We
can
do
provide
that
traffic
count.
Data
I
didn't
have
it
prepared
for
this
discussion.
I'm
sorry,
but
primarily
it
does
drop
off
on
either
side
of
the
block.
You
know
a
block
north
and
a
block
south,
so
the
traffic
by
the
school
probably
is
the
driving
factor
in
this
particular
block.
But
the
mayor
did
summarize
it
very
well
that
this
was
vetted
heavily
through
staff
and
that's
why
we
landed
with
the
recommendation
vacate.
F
H
We
did
not
explore
that
for
a
couple
of
reasons
on
the
Westside
parking
lot
that
we
have
is
one
of
our
main
parking
lots
for
our
church
at
this.
Given
time
and
I,
don't
think
we
could
sacrifice
the
parking
spaces
or
gain
enough
for
that,
and
then
also
when
we
did
do
that
church
building
project
originally
that
area
there.
The
ground
was
not
good.
H
When
we
put
the
parking
lot
in,
we
went
down
probably
three
four
feet
put
the
fabric
in
and
so
I
don't
feel
it
would
be
suitable
for
building
construction
plug
plus
we
do
have
a
storm
so
we're
going
under
there
at
this
point
in
time.
That
actually
goes
around
the
whole
north
side
of
our
property
and
feeds
into
the
main
storm
sewer
themself
and
to
your
question
Jason
on
the
utilities
on
the
south.
It
is
only
a
storm
sewer.
D
B
That
wing
concern
they're
concerned
because
in
the
letter
the
legal
description
mentioned
portions
of
vacated
alleys,
so
that
was
when
people
had
contacted
me.
It
was
more
so
because
they
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
alleys
in
the
area
weren't
being
affected
that
they
weren't
subject
to
be
vacated
to.
They
just
wanted
clarification.
F
Not
that
I
have
objection
to
what
they're
trying
to
do
but
I'm
trying
to
think
about
other
areas
of
the
community
where
you
have
similar
situations,
I,
think
of
Skyline
Drive
between
Holy
Name
and
the
exist
in
the
old
school
there.
If
they
wanted
to
do
something
and
wanted
to
close
off
that
section,
what
would
we
do
in
that
situation?.
E
A
J
E
F
A
L
This
is
seen
as
a
benefit
to
safety
overall
and
then
the
lack
of
need
to
maintain
this
section
of
roadway
is
a
financial
benefit
to
the
city
taxpayers.
Is
it
as
expensive
to
maintain
roads
and
those
may
not
seem
like
large
benefits,
but
there
should
be
a
benefit.
There
should
always
be
a
benefit
to
the
public
before
you
would
vacate
any
right-of-way
improved
or
not.
J
C
N
My
frustration
is
the
the
lack
of
a
traffic
count.
On
the
one
hand
we
say:
there's
not
much
traffic
and
then
the
next
issue.
We
say:
oh,
it's
terrible
traffic
and
it's
a
safety
issue.
I
guess
I'd
like
to
see
a
traffic
count
and
then
compare
that
to
other
schools
in
the
in
the
area,
whether
it
be
Millette
or
Lincoln
and
say
you
know
what
is
the
traffic
count
and
in
the
on
similar
schools.
G
I'll
make
a
comment
to
that.
All
of
those
other
schools
that
you
reference
and
primarily
all
of
the
public
schools
now
I,
would
say
almost
all
of
them,
with
the
exception
of
maybe
Jefferson
in
the
new
middle
school,
about
a
major
collector
Street
in
our
community.
This
side
of
this
school
is
on
a
more
residential
side.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
an
apples-to-apples,
but
I
I
do
think
it
would
be
emeritus
to
compare
the
traffic
counts.
G
North
and
south
of
this
block
and
I
think
you'll
see
that
there
they'll
be
different,
in
other
words,
that
they're
close
most
of
the
traffic
that
goes
through
this
block
segment.
Is
it's
anticipated
that
it's
turning
off
of
the
streets
on
either
end
of
the
block
and
not
continuing
north
or
south
and
I
will
look
for
that
data
and
presented?
D
L
L
It's
it's
school-related
traffic
and
would,
if
there's
not
a
lot,
I
mean
I,
don't
know
what
you're
gonna
do
with
that
information
it.
There
is
a
lot
of
traffic,
but
it's
felt
that
it's
school-related
traffic,
and
so
if
the
school
is
reconfigured
in
the
road
is
closed
off
cars
will
take
the
collector
out
right,
one
block
away
to
get
to
the
school,
and
then
we
coming
in
a
different
way.
F
F
That
there's
also
the
philosophy
that
people
may
always
want
something
more
than
what
they
have.
Never.
They
may
want
to
build
a
bigger
house
than
what
they
have
my
answer,
that
use
and
then
buy
more
property
or
locate.
What
is
that
you
want
to
do
in
a
certain
location,
so
I'm
not
trying
to
be
crass
I'm,
not
trying
to
be
indifferent
to
the
requests,
but
sometimes
you
can
only
do
with
what
you
got,
and
so
those
are
things
that
are
weighing
in
my
head.
I.
E
L
F
E
F
L
Case
you're
concerned
that
the
staff
led
the
applicant
on
I,
don't
think
that's
a
case,
every
conversation
that
I
had
with
them
and
that
the
staff
had
with
them
where
I
was
present.
We
always
said
that,
ultimately,
this
needs
to
be
approved
by
the
public
bodies,
a
planked
mission
in
the
City
Council.
If
the
plan
commission
fails
to
approve
this,
they
can
still
move
it
forward.
A
L
A
A
F
F
The
traffic
count
is
at
this
point.
Time
is
gonna,
be
substantive
enough
to
make
decision
one
way
or
the
other
I
think
really
becomes
more
long-range
policy
decision
and
whether
or
not
the
who
is
truly
benefit
is
the
public
at
large
or
is
it
the
benefit
the
school
and
the
church
and
I
think
there's
a
difference
when
I?
When
you
think
public
public
doesn't
just
mean
you
know
two
or
three
again:
I'm
not
trying
to
be
indifferent,
but
public
is
public.
F
I
J
I
just
think
it's
important
to
recognize
that
I,
don't
think
that
we
are
setting
a
precedent.
I
think
we're
taking.
This
is
a
very
specific,
very
unique
case,
and
there
are
some
very
unique
circumstances
surrounding
it
and
I
don't
I,
don't
for
one
think
that
that
is
opening
the
floodgates
to
having
people
come
back
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
I.
A
J
B
Okay,
the
petitioner
is
Jaime
Andrews,
who
is
the
acting
agent
for
J&J
land
sales.
The
petitioner
submitted
the
application
and
petition
On
February
16
2018,
requesting
approval
for
rezoning
the
current
described
property
from
our
one
family
from
single-family
residential
district
in
our
three
multifamily
residential
district.
All
to
our
two
single-family
attached
district
here
on
the
exhibit
that
was
submitted
with
the
petition
Lots
one
through
four
are
what
are
currently
zoned
r1,
which
is
single-family
residential
and
then
lat.
B
Five
is
currently
zoned,
r3
multi-family
residential
when
Valley
View
first
edition
was
an
axon
zoned
in
2017,
the
Planning
Commission
and
City
Council
approved
what
is
depicted
in
the
attached
exhibit
to
the
particular
petition
that
was
submitted.
For
this
reason,
when
the
developer
J&J
land
cells
presented
the
preliminary
plan
to
plan
commission,
they
approved
the
resolution,
with
the
condition
that
lat
5
block
5
would
be
would
not
be
zoned
r3,
but
instead
are.
This
request
was
never
memorialized
by
a
rezone,
which
is
what
this
petition
is
doing
for
lat
5
black
5
for
Valley
View.
B
First
edition,
the
remaining
Lots
also
included
in
this
rezone,
are
currently
zoned
r1
and
are
being
proposed
to
be
changed
to
r2,
along
with
lot
5
black
5.
So
the
entire
black
would
be
zoned
R
to
the
r2
single-family
attached.
Residential
district
allows
for
the
following
permitted
uses
any
permitted
use
within
the
r1
district,
2
family,
residential
dwellings
or
type
1
manufactured
home,
which
are
described
in
2170
101.
B
Some
facts
for
this
is
the
existing
zoning
designation
designations,
as
I've
said,
are
r1
and
r3
adjacent
to
this
property
to
the
east.
It's
not
annexed,
it's
in
the
county,
so
egg,
presumably
and
then
north
to
the
north,
south
and
west.
It
is
all
zoned
r1,
single-family,
residential
district
and
the
reason
will
extend
and
apply
to
the
center
line
of
the
adjacent
public
grade.
Wood.
A
A
G
A
B
B
E
A
B
F
F
B
B
F
O
O
A
F
F
A
B
Okay,
the
proposed
ordinance
amendment
modifies
the
chart
outlining
the
maximum
mean
height
requirements
for
non-residential
structures,
specifically
the
I
1
light
industrial
district.
The
maximum
mean
heights
were
previously
amended
on
September
19
2016.
When
commercial
zones
were
increased
to
allow
for
taller
buildings,
multiple
variances
had
been
given
for
an
increased
maximum
mean
height,
which
prompted
the
ordinance
amendment.
This
is
also
true
for
I
1,
light
industrial
districts
and
should
have
been
included
during
the
previous
approved
ordinance.
Amendment
staff
city
staff,
supports
plan
commission
recommending
resolution
28
1805
as
presented
to
City
Council.
So.
A
P
B
A
A
A
A
J
D
A
B
B
The
petitioners
submitted
every
plat
requesting
approval
to
split
Lots
28
of
black
Hidden
Valley
addition
into
two
conforming
Lots
lat,
28
8
and
28
B
in
black
of
Hidden
Valley
addition,
which
was
heard
by
the
Planning
Commission
on
June
22nd
of
2018
Planning
Commission,
approved
the
plat
at
the
time,
with
the
condition
that
a
turnaround
isn't
being
negotiated
with
adjacent
landowners.
The
updated
plat
of
Lots,
28
and
28
be
in
black
of
Hidden
Valley
addition
include
a
reconfigured
right-of-way
dimension,
which
is
included
to
accommodate
for
the
alternative
to
the
120
foot.
B
Hammerhead
turn
around
isn't
for
pompous,
get
Drive,
which
was
which
has
historically
came
to
a
dead-end,
causing
issues
for
adjacent
landowners,
garbage
pickup,
snow
removal
and
the
general
public.
Some
facts
about
where
this
plant
is
located
or
these
lots
are
the
adjacent
zoning
designations,
are
our
three
multi-family
residential
district
to
the
south,
a
one
agricultural
district
to
the
east
and.
E
B
B
The
access
Turner,
the
access
road
turnaround,
easement
granted
to
the
city
of
Watertown
by
this
plot,
which
is
located
on
Dennis
Arnold's
property,
described
as
out
lot
a
of
the
in
flat
entitled
Prairie
Hills
development,
2nd
edition
Denis
has
signed
off
on
the
easement,
which
is
not
on
the
proprietor
certificate.
That's
not
attached
to
the
plat
and
that's
what
was
handed
out
to
you
all,
because
it's
a
separate
easement
document,
she's.
C
A
F
F
B
Will
be
seeing
in
the
future
Dennis
Arnold
was
okay
with
me,
alluding
to.
He
has
submitted
a
plat
that
he
would
like
to
pull
out.
Some
Lots
that
are
not
within
that
wetland
doesn't
mean
the
wetland
to
the
east
side
of
the
road
which
this
turnaround.
Easement
is
in
those
plans,
and
it's
configured
that
it
I
mean
it's
not
going
to
effect
so.
A
C
J
G
L
A
E
F
B
Okay,
let
me
pull
up
the
planet,
and
so
the
reason
why
you
were
presented
with
an
amended
plat
is
because
we
requested
a
additional
ten-foot
utility
easement,
which
is
required
by
ordinance
on
that
lot
line.
So
that's
what
changed
from
what
was
in
your
packet,
the
petitioner
Gary
Steinmetz
is
the
acting
agent
for
the
Flyway
Properties
LLC
and
is
the
owner
of
the
property
located
in
Airport
industrial
addition.
B
The
petitioners
submitted
a
plaid,
a
Flyway
first
edition
on
April
16th
2018,
requesting
approval
for
subdividing
the
existing
Airport
industrial
addition
into
five,
not
five,
conforming
lots
with
I
1
light
industrial
and
i2
industrial
zoning
designations.
Lots
one
through
four,
as
you
guys
remember,
probably
we're
Ruiz
owned
from
I
to
to
i1
adjacent
zoning
designations
I
to
heavy.
E
B
B
A
A
A
P
A
F
C
A
B
Okay,
so
staff
was
approached
about
looking
into
group
homes
in
reference
to
a
transitional
halfway
home
that
a
community
member
would
like
to
start.
So
when
we
looked
at
it
group
homes
that,
by
definition,
is
a
supervised
living.
Your
counseling
arrangement
in
a
family
home
context
providing
for
the
24-hour
care
of
children
are
adults.
The
the
person
thought
it'd
be
more
appropriate
if
we
put
a
definition
in
for
transitional
homes
and
then
also
and
can,
if
you
remember,
which
zones
are
group
homes
currently
they're
allowed
and
are
3
2.
P
B
A
A
B
F
We
wouldn't
we
be
looking
at
having
you
know,
you
have
a
group
home
and
then
because
it's
still
under
the
umbrella
group
home,
but
you'd
have
to
say
that
a
group
home
that
is
solely
for
adults
that
are
alcoholic
or
drug
addictions
that
are
receiving
some
sort
of
protected
class
right.
That's
what
we
that's,
what
we're
looking
we're,
not
talking
about
sex
offenders
and
other
felons
and
things
like
that.
No.
B
F
A
F
F
So,
if
I'm,
if
we
perceive
group
home
today,
meaning
people
that
are
children
or
adults
under
some
sort
of
supervised
care,
whether
that
be
like
that
could
very
well
be
alcohol
or
drug
counseling.
But
if
we
change
that
to
transitional
housing
where,
where
what
residential
district
could
I
still
do
adult
drug
and
alcohol
treatment
couldn't.
E
F
B
For
the
old
business,
we
are
going
to
just
give
a
quick
update
on
our
meeting
with
the
park
board
on
February
27th
for
the
river
Ridge
Park
edition
and
the
new
concept
that
they
came
back
to
the
park
board
with.
Let
me
pull
it
up
here,
okay,
so
this
was
what
was
presented,
the
new
location
for
the
park
previously,
as
you
guys
remember,
it
was
approved
by
park
board
and
by
the
preliminary
plan
that
was
approved
by
plan
Commission.
It
was
in
this
area
this.
B
C
B
B
When
we
presented
it
to
the
park
board,
when
they
looked
at
it,
they
they
did
not
like
the
locations.
So
then
the
conversation
spun
to
if
they
would
accept
no
park
in
this
area
would
not
dedicate
land
and
they
would
just
accept
money
in
lieu
of
the
eight
point:
six
two
acres,
so
they
their
request.
They're
recommending
was
for
the
engineering
department
to
work
with
the
director
of
equalization
and
look
at
what
the
land
value
was
in
1997
when
it
was
annexed
and
then
incorporate
the
Consumer
Price
Index.
So
what
that
came
to
was.
B
Five
thousand
two
hundred
and
thirty
six
dollars
and
thirty
nine
cents
that
this
number
has
not
been
presented
to
the
park
board
so
but
upon
talking
with
staff.
Obviously
this
number
is
not
acceptable.
So
then
the
park
board
will
have
to
go
back
and
look
and
decide
if,
if
this
isn't
acceptable,
what
is
and
maybe
they
do
want
park
land
instead.
Okay,.
F
Let's
just
back
up
from
it
from
a
history,
lessons
perspective
back
when
the
original
preliminary
plan
was
proposed
for
this
quarter,
section
of
land
that
was
to
be
developed.
There
was
agreed-upon
area
for
parkland
dedication
where
there
was
actually
going
to
be
a
part
constructed,
and
there
wasn't
going
to
be
a
cash
transaction.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct?
Then
they,
the
developers,
came
back
before
the
board
and
said
we
want
to
actually
develop
those
Lots.
Where
we
had
a
park
dedication.
We
all
had
an
agreement.
They.
F
C
F
That's
what
everybody
agreed
to
the
developer
came
back
and
said
now:
let's,
let's
move
it
someplace
else,
we
promised
a
mill
to
move
park
somewhere
else
and
the
Planning
Commission
agreed
to
it.
The
City
Council
agreed
to
it
in
the
park
board,
agreed
I'm
just
trying
to
get
my
bearings
right
so
now,
when
they
came
back
and
offered
to
put
eight
acres,
which
was
the
requirement
which
was
gonna
go
to
the
south,
but
now
it's
on
the
north,
the
park
board
says
I.
F
We
don't
like
that
location
well,
wanted
back
over
here,
closer
to
second
Street,
and
so
now
the
question
is:
do
we
now
that
now
that
offers
been
made
that
well
we'll
just
as
soon
maybe
the
park
boarding
well
we'll
just
take
cash
over
the
five
acres?
My
question
is:
are
there
any
other
locations
in
the
city
of
Watertown,
where
you
have
a
quarter
sectional
land
where
there
isn't
at
least
a
public
park
in
it?
I
know
the
answer:
is
it
now
right.
E
J
F
B
F
After
it's
busted
up
into
individual
more
than
that
I
think
Park
and
Rec
board
has
the
ability
to
choose
whether
or
not
they
take
land
or
cash.
But
the
Planning
Commission
has
the
ability
to
choose
whether
or
not
they
approve
a
preliminary
plat
and
then,
if
the
Planning
Commission
doesn't
approve
a
preliminary
plad,
because
they
initially
thought
that
they
were
supposed
to
be
part
land
that
everybody
agreed
to
20
years
ago.
F
A
F
B
F
C
A
Have
a
lot
of
small
parcels
of
green
space,
but
this
is
a
rare
opportunity
to
get
a
large
park
in
the
city
of
Watertown.
I
mean
I,
can
admit.
I
grew
up
by
diamond
ball,
it's
an
entire
block
and
you
got
a
lot
of
entire
block
parks
in
the
south
side
of
town.
The
only
thing
you
have
up
north
is
Highland
Park
other
than
that
you've
got
very
small,
tiny
little.
Nothing
parks.
B
E
A
They
agreed
to
delay
every
apparently
the
Planning
Commission
agreed
to
delay
a
park
until
they
developed
the
North
half
of
the
property.
After
after
they
decided
they
weren't
going
to
put
it
down
south,
and
so
now
that
they're
developing
the
north
half
of
the
property.
They
have
to
come
up
with
some
parkland.
E
J
Right
that
I
guess
that
would
be
interesting
or
informative
from
you
know
for
me
anyway.
I
guess
is
that,
if
kind
of
mr.
Kay's
point
if
we
approve
a
plat
with
or
1996
one
area
for
the
plant,
that
that
and
and
the
current
board
approves
the
developments
on
so
forth,
the
zoning
and
all
that
jazz,
the
the
Park
and
Rec
board
can
kind
of
make
their
own
side
deals.
I
guess
I
wasn't
aware
of
that.
Well,.
B
What
makes
so
the
ordinance
reads:
the
board
may
allow
the
owner
to
donate
a
sum
in
cash
equal
to
five
percent
of
the
value
of
the
property
to
be
annexed
or
master-planned,
but
in
no
event
no
less
than
$100
such
decision
she'll
be
solely
at
the
board's
discretion.
The
value
shall
be
determined
by
the
director
of
equalization
and,
if
not
accepted
by
the
owner,
the
valuation
may
be
appealed
to
the
City
Council
within
30
days
after
notification
to
the
owner
in
writing
by
the
board.
A
Which
comes
up
as
soon
as
they
exit
that
land
goes
up
in
value,
so
is
it
the
value
prior
to
annexation
or
after
annexation?
And
in
my
opinion,
it
should
be
the
value
after
we
annex
it.
So
if
they're
gonna
sell
those
for
$40,000
a
lot
and
their
one
acre
lots
that
should
be
$120,000.
The
Park
Board
gets
my.
F
E
F
Much
again
whether
the
developer
should
give
money
or
should
give
land
I
think
that's
already
been
determined
they're
supposed
to
give
land.
That's
what
happened.
T97
I
still
think
that
there's
a
need
for
some
public
green
space
in
that
area,
and
so
why
be
right
now
it's
more
or
less
as
if
the
Park
and
Rec
board
decides
that
they
would
rather
take
cash
as
opposed
to
land.
I
think
that's
problematic.
I.