![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/wmYZOrtvezI/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Commission Meetings 02 08 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
A
A
C
A
B
Andrea
Lindberg
is
the
owner.
Applicant
property
address
is
10:20
cherry
drive,
the
conditional
use
request
per
section,
21,
1403,
five
home
occupations
applicant,
seeks
approval
to
operate
an
unlicensed
home
bakery
business
from
her
primary
residence
located
in
AR,
one
single-family
residential
district
contingent
upon
compliance
with
chapters
chapter
chapter,
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards,
and
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
including,
but
not
limited
to
section
21,
o
o
b7
A
through
H.
In
this
case,
an
unlicensed
home
bakery
is
the
making
and
selling
of
home
baked
goods.
B
Not
a
state
licensed
commercial
kissed
kitchen
staff
finds
that
home
occupations
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
r1
single-family
residential
district
for
2114
o
35.
The
definition
of
a
home
occupation
is
any
occupation
which
is
clearly
secondary
to
the
main
use
of
the
premises
as
a
dwelling
and
does
not
change
the
character
thereof
or
have
any
exterior
evidence
of
such
secondary
use
other
than
a
non
illuminated.
That's
a
lot
non
illuminated
sign
not
exceeding
400
square
inches
in
area.
B
This
occupation
shall
be
carried
on
or
conducted
only
by
members
of
a
family
residing
in
the
dwelling.
The
applicants
submitted
a
site
plan
which
reflects
or
does
not
reflect
the
following
requirements
of
the
section:
21
o
202
to
b7
A
through
H
our
rules,
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
and
it
requires
the
board's
consideration
of
ingress
egress
to
the
property
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering,
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
B
You
can
see
the
site
plan
and
written
request
for
details
on
that
chapter,
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards
Lindberg
proposes
to
utilize
approximately
619
square
feet
or
19%
of
the
3285
square
foot
single-family
dwelling
for
her
home,
baked
goods
business.
She
has
signed
her
assurance
to
comply
with
chapter
20,
170
and
no
specific
signage
is
proposed
at
this
time.
B
Chapter
21
63
is
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
Sufficient
area
exists
for
three
legal
off
street
parking
spaces
to
be
counted
as
a
legal
off
street
parking
space.
It
must
meet
the
minimum
size
and
location
standards
and
allow
the
exit
of
a
vehicle
without
moving
another
vehicle,
and
a
minimum
of
two
off
street
parking
spaces
are
required.
Just
for
the
single-family
dwelling
and
this
board
may
require
more
as
a
condition
of
secondary
uses
such
as
home
occupations,
chapter
21,
65
is
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses.
B
The
ordinance
2165
is
superseded
by
section
21
700
to
the
home.
Lock
you
patient
standards,
number
2
is
no
outdoor,
storage
of
equipment
or
material
used
in
the
home
occupation
shall
be
permitted
and
number
six
is
no
public
display
of
goods
shall
be
allowed
on
the
premises
except
inside
the
principal
building.
There
doesn't
seem
to
be
any
issue
with
these
things.
Chapter
21
73
is
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
The
minimum
number
of
trees
to
be
located
on
the
development
site
shall
be
one
tree
per
50
feet
of
frontage.
B
There
are
no
trees
planted
in
the
boulevard
or
front
yard
at
this
time
and
25
excuse
me.
Titles,
5
1821
is
sidewalk,
trail
curb
and
gutter
requirement
and
the
property
is
compliant.
This
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
titles
described
above.
This
parcel
lacks
minimum
Boulevard
tree
requirements
from
which
the
property
has
never
been
granted
variances.
If
generally
endorsed
the
board,
may
consider
conditions
of
approval
such
as
fulfillment
of
any
are
all
lacking.
A
B
D
B
A
A
E
C
E
F
E
E
H
E
A
B
The
owner
applicant
is
Pat
Shriver.
This
is
1505
through
1521
99th,
Avenue,
southeast
kind
of
commonly
known
as
Shriver
Square.
The
conditional
use
request
is
pursuant
to
zoning
ordinance,
section
21,
2803,
3
bar
tavern
applicant,
seeks
conditional
use
approval
for
this
premises
located
in
the
c
3
highway
commercial
district
to
be
eligible
for
alcoholic
beverage
license
which
may
include
video
lottery
contingent
upon
compliance
with
section,
2.0,
102
location,
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses,
including,
but
not
limited
to
2100
202
to
be
7a
through
H
and
any
other
ordinance
regulations
that
may
apply.
B
Staff
finds
that
bar
tavern
is
a
list
of
conditional
use
for
the
C
3
highway
commercial
district
for
21
2803
3.
The
definition
of
bar
tavern
is
any
establishment,
including
restaurants
and
gambling
establishments
licensed
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
upon
the
premises
were
sold
or
provided.
The
term
bar
tavern
shall
also
include
establishments
licensed
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
off
the
premises
were
sold.
The
applicant
submitted
a
site
plan
which
reflects
or
does
not
reflect
the
following
requirements
of
the
ordinance
section.
B
21,
o
2
O
2
to
be
7
A
through
H
are
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
This
requires
the
board
consideration
of
ingress
and
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering,
signage,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
These
points
were
not
particularly
addressed
on
the
site
plan.
B
2.0
102
is
location,
and
this
no
longer
applies
to
the
c3
zone.
As
of
some
recent
fairly
recent
ordinance
revisions.
So
we
don't
have
to
talk
about
that.
Chapter
21
63
is
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
design
standards.
Again,
you
can
see
the
submitted
site
plan.
The
dimensions
were
not
specified
for
the
aisles
and
parking
spaces,
but
sufficient
area
address
is
is
available.
B
According
to
the
building
official
and
chapter
21
65
outside
storage
and
display
requirements
for
specific
uses,
the
the
application
did
not
address
outside
storage
I,
don't
believe
there
really
is
any
there
chapter,
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
This
property
lacks
required
boulevard
grass
tree
improvements,
as
the
parking
lot
is
blacktop
to
the
curve
where
approximately
20
off
street
parking
spaces
are
defined
or
striped
and
dumpsters
are
not
screened.
They
are
located
behind
the
building,
but
they
are
not
screened.
Titles,
5,
18,
21
and
24
sidewalk
trail
curb
gutter
and
subdivision
of
land.
B
The
property
is
lacking
in
required,
well-defined,
safe
infrastructure
sidewalk,
as
the
parking
lot
is
black
to
top
to
the
curb,
and
this
board
must
determine
in
the
end
of
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
section
21,
o
202
to
b7
A
through
H,
and
the
chapters
and
titles
described
above
previously.
This
parcel
lacks
minimum
Boulevard
and
infrastructure
grass
trees,
sidewalk
trail
requirements.
B
If
generally
endorsed,
this
board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval
such
as
fulfillment
of
any
are
all
lacking:
Boulevard
infrastructure
requirements,
waiver
a
right
to
protest
development,
lot
agreement,
limiting
the
scope
limiting
the
scope
of
approval,
for
example,
the
building
only
or
including
the
parking
lot
etc
for
the
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages,
and/or
any
other
conditions.
The
board
deems
necessary.
A
B
A
A
B
B
Were
that
request
does
not
part
specifically
been
made,
but
it's
up
to
you,
that's
what
we
have
been
doing
on
a
regular
basis
is
kind
of
considering
the
whole
area
in
case
they
want
to
do
some
kind
of
an
event
or
something
you
know.
Is
it
appropriate
for
that?
Yes,
so
you
can,
you
know
demian
entire
property
as
as
okay
approved
site,
and,
if
not,
you
can
just
say,
limited
to
building
this.
D
Area
has
been
here
basically
had
an
active
liquor
license
that
since
the
1970s,
when
I
was
a
bouncer
at
the
Red,
Baron,
no
and
and
Stanton's
opinion
in
the
past
is
whenever
so
place
had
to
just
be
kind
of
grandfather,
the
end
or
whatever.
But
we've
asked
Pat
and
he's
agreed
to
come
in
to
try
to
make
this
book
worthy
legal
and
and
with
the
conditions
that
he
knows
if
the
liquor
license
ever
goes
away
for
more
than
twelve
months.
But
what
this
will
allow
to
do
with.
D
F
D
C
C
H
H
B
What
kind
of
happened
here
is
we
started
getting
some
inquiry
by
being?
Actually
the
restaurant,
the
Italian
restaurant?
That's
in
there
now,
and
then
we
got
to
thinking
well.
Why
don't?
We
just
have
Pat
kind
of
get
the
whole
area
approved,
because
you
know
several
of
these
spaces
could
want
to.
You
know
could
be
restaurants
or
you
know
wanting
to
sell
alcohol,
so
we
just
thought.
B
H
C
F
C
I
Correct,
in
fact,
I
think
the
state
and
I'm
not
sure
on
this
corridor
if,
if
they've
identified,
every
honor,
but
what
they've
been
doing
is
acquiring
additional
right
away
and
or
easements
to
accommodate
the
sidewalk
where
they
need
it.
This
and
I
can't
say
that
this
property
needs
to
give
up
space
to
for
more
right
away
or
not
that's
a
VOT
question,
but
they
are
planning
to
install
a
sidewalk
and
they're
acquiring
right
away.
Accordingly,
mister.
J
J
C
B
A
A
So
basically,
the
way
it's
working
now
is:
if
anybody
wants
to
have
alcoholic
beverage
in
your
building,
they
have
to
come
before
this
board
individually
and
request
it
and
you're
just
trying
to
eliminate
that
step.
They'll
still
have
to
go
to
the
City
Council
and
get
individual
approval
there,
but
this
would
just
allow
you
to
bypass
this
board
and
have
a
good
for
the
entire
building
and
property
correct.
F
J
Alcohol
on
the
premises
since
1972
as
we
can
go
as
far
back
where
the
discrepancy
was,
is
the
way
we
maintain
and
monitor
our
conditional
use.
No
one
could
tell
us
if
there's
ever
been
a
conditional
use
on
the
property
or
not
the
way,
they're
logged,
so
we
just
said,
come
in,
let's
get
the
conditional
use
if
I
have
an
open
space
and
I'm
going
to
lease
it
to
a
restaurant,
you
don't
want
to
go
through
the
leasing
process.
J
J
There's
one
six
yard
dumpster,
it's
in
the
you
can
see.
We
read
about
where
that
pointer
is
at
it's
screened
by
my
building
that
storage
built
by
three
storage
buildings
is
the
screen.
There's
no
residences
with
you
can
see.
You've
got
Runnings,
you've
got
400-foot
storage,
building,
200
foot
store.
F
J
J
Hard
to
screen
back
in
there
just
because
of
one's
snow
and
the
wind
blows,
and
if
you
had
a
fence
up
there,
you
can
see
how
tight
it
is.
Everything's,
zero
lot
line
back
there,
you
start
putting
fences
and
screening
up
and
you're
gonna
start
stacking
snow
on
your
neighbor's
property.
It's
hard
for
the
snow,
mobile.
A
D
H
J
F
J
Of
their
the
encroachment
which
has
all
been
handled
by
easements
and
agreements
for
ingress
and
egress
is
the
area
that
that
triangle,
where
her
pointer
is
that
goes
up.
Part
of
their
car
washes
on
my
property
and
then
that
square
that
triangle
square.
That's
a
different
color.
There
that's
concrete
floor
pavement,
but
we
handled
that
back
in
1996,
mm-hmm.
F
J
J
Anything
we're
not.
We
don't
have
a
casino,
we
don't
have
a
video
lottery,
we
don't
have
a
bar.
There's
a
restaurant.
That's
been
there
since
1994
the
restaurant
that
went
in
in
2010
and
again
in
2012
Stan's
opinion
was
because
the
property
already
had
alcohol
on
it.
It
wasn't
required
to
come
before
the
Lord
for
conditioners,
and
that
was
the
opinion
of
the
attorney
at
that
time.
That
was
the
opinion.
I
believe
a
foley
also
when
he
was
before
Stan
right.
So
we're
not
changing
anything.
F
A
C
A
B
G
A
A
A
Ready
brain
okay.
K
E
G
A
By
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say,
aye
aye
motion
carries
and
we're
to
is
approval
of
the
minutes
of
January
2018
meeting
a
motion,
some
of
motion
by
mr.
Kay's
second,
second
by
mr.
Hanson,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
item
number
3
platter,
the
River
Ridge
Park
edition
Randy.
So.
K
This
plat
was
presented
to
you
two
meetings
ago
and
then
was
postponed
the
last
time
being
postponed
from
the
January
18th
meeting.
And
since
then,
we
have
had
contact
with
mr.
Hoff
Teezer,
who
is
the
applicant
and
property
owner
or
the
area
of
River
Ridge
Park
edition,
which
was
presented
to
dedicate
the
park
requirement
for
his
subdivision
of
River
estates,
and
here
pull
open
the
the
letter
of
the
letter
to
rescind
the
plat
so
on.
K
January,
30th,
Shane
and
I,
presented
to
the
Park
and
Rec
board
and
informed
them
on
where
we
were
at
with
this
dedication
and
that
he
would
be
coming
back
with
concepts
of
different
locations.
After
we
had
more
discussion
about
infrastructure
improvements
and
maybe
coming
up
with
a
more
strategic
location
for
the
park.
K
K
K
B
At
the
board's
direction,
we
were
asked
to
come
up
with
or
start
looking
at
drafting
some
changes
to
the
home
occupations
ordinance.
One
of
those
changes
was
to
basically
eliminate
home
daycares
from
home
occupations,
and
we
have
talked
about
removing
them
all
together
and
having
them
state
registered,
having
to
have
state
registration
and
just
taking
it
out
of
the
city's
hands
and
leaving
it
with
the
state.
When.
C
A
G
C
We
make
them
a
permitted
use
subject
to
meeting
those
requirements,
then
they
don't
have
to
come
see
us
such
as
the
parking
standards
that
we
always
have
to
have,
such
as
a
minimum
square
footage
some
of
those
types
of
things
you
can
there's
plenty
of
examples
out
there
in
other
communities
that
have
put
together,
I,
look
at
many
home
and
it's
not
just
daycares
I,
look
at
most
home
occupations
as
an
accessory
use
to
the
principal
structure.
It's
not
the
main
purpose
right.
C
That
I
need
to
know
that
maybe
Liam
decides
open
up
a
legal
practice
at
his
house
or
an
accounting
service
at
his
house
and
as
long
as
the
traffic
levels
are
this
that
and
the
other
thing,
and
he
doesn't
have
a
big
bright
sign
out
there,
causing
things
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
what
I
care.
If,
as
long
as
we
have
some
set
standards
and
the
standards
are
being
mad,
that's
my
opinion.
I.
G
A
B
C
We
know
if
we
were
just
to
go
back
and
take
a
look
at
a
litany
of
the
last
five
years.
The
last
ten
years,
the
number
of
home
occupation,
premiss,
we've
tracked
them
types
and
we
and
we
come
up
at
there's,
there's
six
that
are
here
every
year
that
we've
never
denied
and
then
we've
attached
all
the
conditions
that
we've
always
condition.
While
we
just
make
that
the
standard,
and
then
we
don't
have
to
see
them,
it's
less
work
for
us.
It's
a
lot
less
work
for
you.
B
Well,
and
on
the
same,
the
second
thing
we
are
going
to
talk
about
was
the
the
very
low
impact
type
of
home
occupations,
which
would
be
basically,
you
know.
Telemarketing
telecommunicator
excuse
me
telecommuting,
direct
sales,
vendors,
artists,
hobbyists,
your
farmer,
trucker.
That
does
not
bring
a
vehicle
or
anything
home,
but
just
has
his
own
office
there
and
he
works
off-site.
B
A
Think
that's
a
good
direction
to
go.
Just
you've
heard
our
you
know
comments
on
the
state-registered
stuff,
also
too.
In
that
vein,
I
noticed
that
when
I
was
viewing
the
last
two
meetings
that
I've
missed
so
I
didn't
really
miss
out
on
all
the
stuff
that
there
was
questions
about
variances
and
that
have
been
coming
came
up
through
the
last
few
years
and
the
frequency
of
certain
variances
that
may
trigger.
Maybe
we
should
change
the
ordinates.
If
we
have
a
you
know,
denote
amount
of
the
same
type
of
variance
requests.
A
G
B
K
H
K
Okay
and
then
we
have
the
staff
report
and
recommendation
for
pheasant
Lane.
So
we've
been
talking
about
pheasant
Lane,
since
last
March,
when
we
rezone
Padma
holds
property
to
our
G
from
our
one,
and
so
in
October
staff
was
tasked
with
reaching
out
to
property
owners
and
I
guess
seeing
what
their
appetite
was
for,
what
they
want
to
do
with
their
property,
and
we
sent
out
a
letter
on
December
21st,
and
we
have
heard
back
from
all
of
the
landowners
except
for
three,
and
so
we
gave
them
two
options.
K
K
So
we
got
all
the
property
owners.
Twenty-Eight
percent
of
them
were
in
favor
of
rezoning
to
RG,
and
then
twelve
percent
were
interested
in
rezoning
or
in
an
improvement
to
pheasant
lane.
So
it
was
under
fifty
percent,
which
didn't
really
tell
us
a
lot,
but
also
during
that
process
we
had
the
surveying
crew,
go
out
and
stake
different
property
pins
and
lay
out
where
the
right-of-way
is
within
that
area.
And
there
is
it's
passable
as
far
as
the
grading,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
obstructions
and
there
are
there's
people's
property
within
the
right-of-way.
K
K
F
I
I
Some
of
the
some
of
the
vegetation
is
what
I
would
say,
volunteer,
trees
and
obstructions
that
way,
but
there
are
some
that
are
intentional
plantings
of
trees
too.
That
would
need
to
be
relocated.
So
there's
a
variety
of
encroachment
issues.
We
would
just
look
to
maybe
get
it
all
cleaned
up,
so
that
we
can
kind
of
reestablish
where
pheasant
lane
is
is.
E
K
And
since
that
there
have
been
some
stakes
that
are
removed,
so
I
mean
that
will
just
be
a
matter
of
remarrying
I
know
doc.
Howard
was
the
property
on
the
north
side,
he
has
put
a
white
electric
fence,
so
it's
very
clear
where
the
boundary
is.
So,
if
anything,
you
could
measure
60-foot
off
of
that,
because
that's
what
the
right-of-way
is.
A
K
C
A
I
Yes,
but
we
we
don't
pursue
that
much
when
it's
not
in
the
developed
portion
of
town,
where
it
is
a
higher
standard
of
grooming.
This
is,
it
is
technically
right
away,
but
we
hit
there's
no
complaints
that
we
receive
on
that
and
most
of
those
issues
like
that,
our
complaint
driven.
So
we
do
clear
up
the
complaint
driven
so.
A
C
F
C
D
C
C
Don't
believe
that
there,
the
city
has
won
out
and
made
if
I
it's
a
different
situation,
if
you're
talking
about
a
piece
of
property
that
is
developed
or
I
have
a
structure
on
it,
where
there's
an
implied
idea
that
you
need
to
be
maintaining
it.
But
if
you
got
a
piece
of
ground
where
there
is
no
road
there
are
there
are,
there
are
no
public
improvements,
it
doesn't,
but
up
to
anything
except
a
backyard
or
somebody's
house
or
another
piece
of
property.
I
don't
find
that
that
that
the
requirement
should
apply
to
them.
H
Would
would
the
direction
whatever
ends
up
going
with
the
zoning
impact?
What
you've
done
with
this?
You
know
the
staking
and
the
roads,
that
is
to
say
that
if
it's
rezone
does
our
G
with
that,
but
that
have
an
impact
on.
You
know
any
of
these
issues
with
the
the
trees
and
the
volunteer
trees
and
no.
I
The
the
right
away
is
the
right
away
the
what
I
guess
I'll
skip
ahead
here
a
little
bit,
but
the
one
thing
we
might
want
to
consider
is
if
the
public
were
ever
to
choose
to
use
the
right
away
as
it
is
volunteer,
trees,
tall
grass,
that's
one
thing,
but
if
somebody
has
like
a
camper
or
fence
or
planted
a
roll
of
evergreen
trees
across
it,
that
this
allows
the
public
to
use
the
right
way.
I
That's
probably
the
discussion
that
needs
to
be
had
from
that
aspect
and
when
I
say
skipping
ahead,
just
kind
of
simplify
this
all
this
research
that
Brandi
did
with
the
property
owners
is
really
led
to
a
non
consensus
on
how
to
address
pheasant,
Lane
and
access
and
and
get
the
issuance
of
building
permits
is
ultimately
the
goal.
So
I
think
with
that.
We've
clearly
not
got
a
consensus
where
we're
going
to
include
multiple
property
owners.
I
think
we
need
to
step
back
now
and
probably
look
at
mr.
I
mow
Holtz
request
on
a
individual
basis
and
then
kind
of
apply
it
from
our
ordinance
driven
view,
which
typically
is
an
improved
Road,
and
things
like
that.
Now
the
city
is
also
in
the
process
and,
albeit
nothing's,
been
approved
yet,
but
we,
we
are
kind
of
looking
at
a
set
of
engineering
standards
that
we're
proposing
in
the
future
to
bring
into
the
community
I
think
we
would
probably
try
to
look
at
that
and
see
how
that
would
address
this
situation
too.
I
And
ultimately,
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
come
up
with
a
couple
of
possible
options
that
and
discuss
those
with
Mr
Mol
and
I'll,
we'll
vet
this
through
staff,
to
make
sure
that
we
were
comfortable
how
that
goes
and
then
bring
that
back
to
this
board
for
another
open
discussion
and
yet
know
if
we
follow
every
portion
of
the
ordinance
ik,
it
does
require
to
have
a
developed
road
with
pavement,
curb
gutter
utilities,
all
that
and
I,
don't
think.
That's
probably
where
this
will
land.
I
But
we
certainly
need
to
recognize
that
it's
important
to
indoctrinate
that
those
improvements
are
expected
at
some
point
in
the
life
time
of
pheasant
lane,
and
so
we
have
to
respect
both
or
at
today
and
where
we
need
to
be.
You
know
20
30
years
from
now.
So
that's
where
we
got
to
go
and
that's
where
what
I
think
will
come
out
of
this.
A
K
K
I
Well,
my
goal
would
be
I
mean:
we've
we've
put
in
a
lot
of
work,
I
know
you
and
will
put
in
whatever
it
takes
to
get
us
moving
for
it,
and
if
I
I
don't
want
to
make
any
commitments,
but
I
mean
ultimately
one
reality
could
be.
That
going
forward
means
we
do
nothing
but
I,
don't
think
that
that's
where
I
want
it
to
land,
but
presently.
I
A
I
K
I'm,
having
ditches
and
in
the
design
standards
that
is
allowed
within
city
limits,
and
there
are
specifications
for
it
that
that
might
be
an
option
where
it
would
be
written
into
like
an
access
agreement
where
they
have
to
improve
that
right-of-way
to
the
extent
of
their
property
lines,
and
then
also
say
say:
Pat
would
develop
his
property
right
here
and
then
this
property
owner
down
the
road
came
and
they
wanted
to
build
a
garage.
But
they
would
need
a
public
road
provement
in
front
of
their
property
as
well
to
get
the
building
permit.
K
F
K
I
A
You
brandy,
I,
have
one
other
question
for
you
or
for
Shane.
Are
there
any
other
issues
for
that
need
to
be
resolved
before
the
current
construction
season
starts
on
this
or
any
other
thing
that
may
be
starting
this
summer?
Do
you
know
of
any
construction
parties?
People
always
say
well
they'll
come
in
June
and
want
something
approved
by
July,
or
do
you
know
anything
on
the
burner?
That's
we.
K
Are
still
working
towards
the
resort
subcommittee
and
looking
at
that
in
the
r-1
ordinance
to
see
if
we
can
put
that
in
as
use,
and
that
would
be
something
that
I
think
people
would
want
to
utilize
this
summer
in
the
building
season.
If
that
were
an
option,
and
that
committee
is
formed
and
I
sent
out
a
poll
yesterday
to
see
availability
and
then,
if
we'll
get
a
meeting
together.
Next,
it's
looking
like
beginning
of
next
week
when.
K
A
I
D
A
A
K
A
minute,
but
as
far
as
Pat
then
letting
him
know
where
we're
at
with
it.
I
guess
do
we
say
if
you
want
right
now
where
it
would
be
in
ordinance
if
he'd
want
to
get
a
building
permit
tomorrow,
he
would
have
to
assure
that
he
would
improve
the
road
to
city
standards
to
the
full
extent
and
obviously
then
he
would
not
be
in
favor
of
that.
So
then
he'd
come
forth
with
like
a
variance
and
I.
Don't
know.
I
We'll
work
with
mr.
Mahone
find
out
what
options
are
viable
if
they
don't.
If
it's
anything
that
doesn't
follow
the
rights
that
our
office
have
to
issue
will
definitely
be
brought,
but
for
the
Planning
Commission
and
probably
ultimately
the
City
Council,
because
we
don't
have
the
authority
to
bypass
the
ordinances.
We
have
to
run
that
through
the
process
and
come
out
accordingly.
So
that's
that
would
be
our
intention
with
will
have
to
first
roll
up
our
sleeves
and
hopefully
come
to
some
terms
with
mr.