►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 01 04 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
A
A
A
No
plat
will
be
recorded
until
Park
dedication
requirement
has
been
met
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
park
board
in
accordance
with
the
ordinance
section,
1401
2-0
and
then
10
that
a
letter
of
assurance
between
High
Plains,
Development,
Corp
and
the
city
outlining
the
timeline
for
dedication
of
the
approved
park
to
city.
So
the
park
board
met
and
approved.
The
park
proposal
is
presented
by
high
plains
development
Corps
on
April
25th
2017.
A
In
the
letter
of
assurance,
that's
attached
in
your
packet,
Greg
Hoff
teaser,
guaranteed
to
plat
and
dedicate
to
the
city
of
Watertown
the
8.6
two
acre
park
area
as
depicted
as
Exhibit
A.
This
plat
is
following
through
with
that
agreement.
The
letter
of
assurance
was
also
presented
and
accepted
at
the
June
8th
2017
plan
Commission
meeting
the
area
encompassed
with
the
plat
within
the
plat
of
River
Ridge
Park.
Addition
is
currently
zoned
a1
agricultural
district
and
will
remain
within
that
zoning
designation.
A
So
we
have
it
on
there
that
staff
recommends
that
the
plan
Commission
approved
the
plat
of
River
Ridge
Park
addition,
but
after
some
discussion
with
the
developer
and
looking
forward
at
like
infrastructure
improvements
for
the
development
agreement
that
would
come
with
this
plat,
we
would
recommend
to
table
this
item
until
some
of
those
details
are
worked
out
and
I
can
kind
of
go
into
detail
of
the
routes
where
that
could
go
or
discussion.
That
needs
to
happen.
Potentially,
with
with
you
guys.
B
A
So
we
had
them
draft
the
letter
of
assurance
saying
that
they
would
dedicate
the
8.6
two
acres
required
for
their
subdivision
before
December
31st
2017,
and
they
did
submit
this
on
December
14th,
and
this
was
the
area
that
the
park
board
and
Planning
Commission
approved
and
then
after
talking,
though,
with
Greg,
he
was
hesitant
to
I
guess
to
take
all
the
responsibility
of
doing
those
infrastructures
improve
infrastructure.
Improvements
on
26th
and
I
can
read
this
summary
to
that.
A
In
there
too,
we
have
the
title:
24:05
1
references
for
completion
of
minimum
improvements,
and
that
is
saying
that
no
plat
of
any
subdivision
shall
be
approved
unless
the
improvements
required
by
this
ordinance
have
been
installed
prior
to
such
approval
or
unless
the
developer
has
signed
a
development
agreement
to
establish
the
responsibility
for
the
construction
of
such
improvements
in
a
satisfactory
manner
within
a
period
specified
by
the
City
Council
such
period
not
to
exceed
two
years.
An
extension
to
the
two-year
period
may
be
granted
at
the
discretion
of
the
City
Council.
A
This
development
agreement
shall
be
recorded
with
the
register
of
Dee's
at
the
time
the
plat,
so
the
Platte
River
Ridge
Park
edition
has
challenges
because
one
it's
not
adjacent
to
any
of
the
River
Ridge
Editions.
Creating
an
access
issue
to
it
has
a
large
portion
of
right
away
with
unimproved
streets
and
three.
It
has
a
requirement
being
made
by
the
Erb.
It
was
a
requirement
made
by
playing
Commission
and
park
board
to
ensure
the
five
percent
park.
A
Dedication
requirement
is
completed
so
and
then,
after
some
discussion
with
the
developer,
who
was
unable
to
meet
to
make
the
meeting
today
on
improvement
requirements,
he
expressed
his
resistance
to
being
solely
responsible
for
street
improvements
adjacent
adjacent
to
the
park,
as
he
feels
dedicating
the
developable
developable
land
to
the
public
is
sufficient
and
that
the
infrastructure
improvements
shouldn't
be
solely
his
expense.
He
is
willing
to
explore
other
strategic
locations
for
the
park
that
doesn't
require
such
a
lengthy
expansive
Street
that
he
would
be
unable
to
recover
classroom.
A
A
E
A
E
Another
housing
ask
another
question:
what's
the
current
policy
for
the
city
when
we
are
annexing
and
planning
and
developing
property,
when
we
were
butting
up
against
Township
our
County
roads
and
only
taking
to
the
half
of
the
half
of
them
right
away?
Is
there
any
have
we
had
a
policy
in
place
of
taking
the
whole
right
away,
so
we
don't
run
into
other
development
issues
that
move
forward.
E
We
do
that
on
41st
out
there
passed
the
pheasant
ridge,
our
43rd
did
you
take
part
of
that?
It's
just
something.
I
think
we
should
be
considering
you,
even
though,
if
we
could
figure
out
a
way,
maintenance
rate
agreements
with
the
townships
or
the
counties.
But
it
seems
to
me
that
if
we
are
looking
at
annexing
property
or
developing
property
and
only
taking
half
streets,
it
becomes
cumbersome
down
the
road
when
we
are
only
building
half
streets
and
those
types
of
things
and
I'm.
Just
thinking
forward-looking.
D
Speak
to
that
Sarah,
Karen
Mayer.
Now
in
the
past
we
we
tried
to
annex
the
full-width
in
some
cases,
there's
two
property
owners
and
we
they're
on
several
occasions
unable
to
even
reach
the
property
owner
on
the
other
side
from
the
development.
But
wherever
we've
been
able
to
annex
the
entire
right-of-way,
we
have-
and
we
think
that's
the
best
policy.
So
then
there's
no
confusion
about
who's
right
of
way.
That
is,
and
it's
it's
because
you
have
1/2
the
county
or
the
township
1/2.
The
city's
responsibility
for
maintenance
has.
D
A
F
B
F
The
sole
participant
in
their
portion
of
26th
Street
for
that
they
feel
that
they've
given
up
the
5%,
which
is
by
ordinance
but
in
other
developments,
the
city's
acquired
the
5%
Park
dedication
and
still
got
the
infrastructure
improvements
done
by
the
developer.
So
we're
that's.
Our
our
course
is
to
pursue
that,
and
what
we've
got
on
the
table
now
is:
okay.
They've
supplied
us
this
plat,
which
is
consistent
with
the
Park
Park
and
Rec
committee
recommendation,
and
the
preliminary
plan
recommendation
that
was
approved
in
the
spring
of
2017
I.
F
Think
where
this
is
headed
is,
if
there's
a
bad
enough
taste
about
those
public
infrastructures
that
we'll
have
to
visit
with
the
developer
and
renegotiate
a
different
park
location
we
and
we,
as
staff
at
least,
have
one
place
that
we
would
like
to
propose
that
and
brandy
can
show
you
that
on
the
screen
right
now
and
then
see
where
that
discussion
goes
and
if
that's
amenable,
then
what
we
would
do
is
bring
that
back
to
the
park
and
Rec
community
to
have
them.
Re--
bless
it.
F
We
probably
change
the
preliminary
plan
and
get
this
move
to
a
different
location.
That's
more
acceptable
to
the
developer,
based
on
the
cost,
but
we're
thinking
something
like
where,
where
this
red
box
is
shown
might
be
doable,
it's
still
got
some
infrastructure
beside
it,
but
certainly
a
lot
less
than
his
other
commitment
would
be,
and
so
we're
gonna
we're
trying
to
set
up
a
meeting
with
the
owner.
And
what?
If,
if
where
this
goes,
is
this
direction?
What
we
would
do
is
or
I'll
back
up?
F
What
we're
gonna
recommend
to
you
today
is
that
you
table
the
plat.
That's
before
you,
staff
will
go
forward.
Have
these
conversations
to
make
sure
that
the
developer
and
city
all
agree
to
a
change
of
course,
then
likely?
What
would
happen
is
they
will
rescind
the
plat?
That's
before
you
today
we
would
bring
forward
a
different
plan
and
get
this
thing
resolved.
You.
F
And
what
we
would
do
is
now,
because
this
still
wouldn't
be
contiguous
to
the
to
the
length
to
the
previous
subdivisions.
The
portion
south
of
this
red
box
I
would
propose
being
included
as
an
outline
to
start
with,
so
that
it
does
touch
the
city
proper,
and
then
he
can
change
that
outline
forward
with
a
different
plan.
A
Plan-
and
so
that
would
be
the
route
that
if
but
with
this
plat,
they
were
trying
to
fulfill
their
letter
of
assurance,
because
it
is
important
that
we
get
that
8.6
2
acres
for
them
to
meet
that
part
requirement.
Park
dedication
requirement,
but
then,
when
we
had
conversations
about
the
infrastructure,
there's
more
strategic
places
where
he
will
have
to
put
in
I
mean
26th
Street.
He
would
still
have
to
improve
to
a
local
street
standard.
A
F
A
E
I
make
a
motion
to
postpone,
not
is
the
proper
motion
and
when
my
postpone
it
means
that
it
comes
back
next
month.
And
if
we
don't
take
action,
then
the
motion
would
be
to
deny
or
would
be
to
approve.
But
we
would
have
to
deny
that
approval,
because
if
we
were
to
table
the
motion,
which
means
we'd,
have
to
take
it
up
off
the
table
during
this
meeting.
But
Luke
will
tell
us
all
about
that
later.
E
E
E
E
G
A
So
Luke
will
be
giving
us
a
presentation.
I
was
just
going
to
update
you
guys.
Previously.
We
had
talked
about
looking
forming
a
committee
about
adding
resorts
in
the
r1
single-family
residential
district
and
that
you
would
asks
us
to
form
a
committee
in
January
and
we
are
putting
a
list
together
right
now
and
we
should
be
able
to
be
in
contact
with
those
people
next
week.
So
then
we
can
keep
this
moving
forward.
So
then
we
can
eventually
bring
something
to
you
guys.
G
Thank
you
and
good
afternoon
board
thanks
for
the
chance
to
come
and
speak
to
you
I've,
the
presentation
will
be
real,
similar
I've
handled
this
presentation
a
few
times
a
lot
of
different
places,
including
in
Watertown.
Some
of
the
information
will
be
a
little
bit
similar
to
what
we've
done
a
couple
years
ago,
but
some
of
you
weren't
here
a
couple
years
ago,
I'm
Luke
Muller.
For
those
who
don't
know
me
a
planner
with
first
District
Association
of
Governments
I
serve
as
owning
officer
in
that
job.
G
One
of
the
topics
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
is
is
I.
Do
a
lot
of
trainings
across
the
area
that
we
work
with
in
first
District
Association
of
Governments,
and
what
I'm
going
to
talk
about
today.
I've
got
about
what
amounts
to
six
hours
so
strap
in,
and
we
will
sit
for
the
rest
of
the
night.
It's
about
six
hours
of
presentation
that
I
figure.
G
We
go
over
as
you
get
time
over
the
course
of
the
next
year
or
so,
and
it
starts
at
a
very
high
level
more
about
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
it's
real
handy
time.
Of
course,
six
months
into
you
doing
this
gig
that
we're
gonna
teach
you
now
what
you've
been
doing
for
the
last
six
months,
but
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
sorts
of
permits
are
out
there,
how
you're
handling
them
and
just
kind
of
mindset
a
little
bit
from
a
from
an
idea,
ideology
and
I
figure.
G
We're
gonna
call
the
game
for
the
day,
but
from
today
we're
going
to
talk
about
permits
and
then
a
little
bit
in
to
meeting,
and
so
that's
where
I'm
going
to
start
as
far
as
just
the
zoning
ordinance
itself
in
the
the
permit
process
or
the
permit
pyramid
as
I
guess
we
talked
about
it
and
on
this
pyramid
you
see
here,
you've
got
more
and
less
discretion
at
the
top.
You
get
less
discretion
as
far
as
building
permits.
That's
basically,
when
Ken
gets
a
building
permit
application
he's
got
a
narrow
box.
He
can
look
at.
G
Does
it
meet
these
things?
Yes
or
no?
If
it
does
you
get
the
permit,
if
it
doesn't,
then
we
got
to
go
down
a
step.
It
either
gets
goes
back
to
the
person,
or
else
they've
got
to
ask
for
a
variance
or
for
a
conditional
use.
That's
why
often
times
and
I.
This
is
the
part
where
I
become
the
apologist
for
the
staff.
In
some
case.
That's
why
sometimes
staff
gets
the
the
rap
of
really
rigid
you're
only
thinking
in
the
box.
G
Well,
that's
because
the
ordinance
is
written
that
we're
supposed
to
only
think
in
the
box,
and
so
staff
comes
in
that
way
handling
that,
but
if
there's
a
request
for
something
that
needs
that
needs
a
variance,
there
are
cases
where
that
can
happen.
There's
the
same
thing
with
conditional
uses
we'll
talk
about
what
those
are
now
this.
G
This
is
the
process
for
reviewing
a
permit
and
I'm,
really
not
going
to
go
through
all
of
these
jigs
and
arrows.
You
can
go
ahead
and
study
that
as
you
want,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
every
step
of
that
process
is
in
there.
I
spent
hours
and
hours
making
this
and
I've
spent
it
in
total
about
45
seconds
showing
this
to
people,
because
it's
so
convoluted
that
it
really
is
difficult
to
follow
along.
But
the
point
is
you're
gonna
look.
Staff
is
gonna.
Take
that
thing,
they're
gonna,
look
at
it!
G
Whether
or
not
the
use
match
is
something
that
they
can
do.
If
it's
not
a
permitted
use
that
they
can
issue
it,
they
realize
they
either
it's
either
something
that's
prohibited
and
they've
got
to
go
to
amend
the
zoning
ordinance.
They
can
either
be
told,
no
just
don't
do
it
or
they're
going
to
have
to
apply
for
a
conditional
use
if
it's
something
that's
a
conditional
use,
and
so
it's
it's
somewhat.
It's
going
to
be
one
of
those
instances.
If
it's
a
permitted
use,
they
can
look
at
whether
or
not
it
needs
a
variance.
G
G
G
Yes
or
no,
we
find
something
that
doesn't
meet
the
ordinance,
that's
where
the
variance
comes
in
and
you
handle
you've
obviously
had
a
few
variance
requests
in
front
of
you
and
just
kind
of
get
you
in
as
far
as
what
that
is,
you've
got
the
idea
that
this
is
that
it's
a
request
to
to
do
something:
that's
outside
of
the
ordinance,
but
it's
far
a
statute
ability
to
do
this
or
statutory
authority.
It
comes
in
statute
11
for
17,
under
the
powers
of
the
board,
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
G
That's
you
have
the
ability
to
hear,
and
it
outlines
three
things,
but
number
two
is
to
authorize
you're
allowed
to
authorize
variance
from
the
terms
of
the
ordinance
we're
owing
to
special
conditions.
A
literal
enforcement
of
this
ordinance
would
result
in
unnecessary
hardship,
and
so
the
bottom
line
is
that's.
What
you're
keeping
in
mind
is
you're
issuing
it
variances.
It
is
not
it's
not
a
case
of
well
it'll,
be
easier
for
them.
Well,
easier!
Is
not
what
that's
about
it's
about.
G
It's
an
unnecessary
hardship
that
is
unique
to
this
person,
we'll
talk
about
that
in
a
minute,
but
that's
where
that's.
Where
the
the
statutory
authority
comes
from
from
standpoint
of
your
ordinance,
then
you,
you
list
that
into
your
ordinance
and
you've
just
got
defined
in
there
and
I'm.
Not
gonna
read
totally
from
your
ordinance,
but
it's
it's.
It
summarizes
what
number
two
says:
you're:
granting
relief
from
the
provisions
of
the
ordinance
as
applied
to
a
specific
piece
of
property.
G
One
thing
that's
important
to
note,
though,
and
I
don't
always
get
into
this,
but
it's
important
to
keep
in
mind
note
how,
in
your
definition,
it
says
that
it's
a
relief
from
the
provisions
of
this
ordinance
as
it
applies
to
the
specific
piece
of
perdy,
it's
not
to
that
building
project
it's
to
the
property.
So,
if
I
grant
a
setback,
variance
to
allow
me
to
be
one
foot
off
of
the
property
line,
it's
not
just
for
that
8
by
10,
shed
it's
for
the
whole
property
line.
That
lines
been
now
moved
you
can.
G
You
can
perhaps
specify
where
that
winds
up
being,
maybe
through
findings
to
specify
here's.
Why?
But,
if
you
don't
it's
you
just
move.
The
line
on
them
is
what
it
amounted
to.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
to
keep
in
mind
as
you
do.
That
is
that
is
it
it's
intended
to
be.
If
that
hardship
is
unique
to
this
property,
it's
unique
to
the
property.
It's
not
unique
to
the
building
project.
That
would
be
more
of
a
monetary
thing.
So
that's
something
to
keep
in
mind
as
you
as
you
handle
variances
in
plain
English.
G
As
far
as
the
definitions
go,
you
need
to
have
them
based
upon
the
application
to
the
regulations
you're,
not
taking
the
individual
you're,
taking
the
application
specific
on
their
property,
the
things
they
want
to
do
in
reference
to
the
ordinance
itself.
They
need
to
prove
that
there's
unreasonable
hardship
to
receive
the
variance
that
it's
something
that's
not
bore
of
their
own
accord
and
it's
something
that's
not
their
own.
It's
not
their
own
doing
I!
Guess
each
community
has
their
own
standards
based
for
variances.
However,
most
of
those
are
based
into
either.
G
A
lot
of
them
are
based
into
Court.
Decisions
is
where
a
lot
of
them
come
from.
I
mean,
let's
be
honest,
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
the
municipality
zoning
ordinances
are
similar
and
there's
a
reason
for
that,
and
that's
because,
as
far
as
variances
go,
they
come
from,
they
come
from
court
cases,
they've
come
out
and
people
have
that
experience
out
there.
They
know
where
they
need
to
go.
Some
places
do
have
listed
into
their
ordinance
things
that
I
can't
like
to
see
taken
out
to
be
honest
and
they're
called
variance
standards.
G
Essentially,
where
you
get
a
variance,
if
you
do
X
Y
Z,
one
thing
that
I
would
say
is
it
is
you
look
at
ordinances
you
may
want
to
take
out
those
ghetto
jail,
free
cards,
turn
them
into
permitted
uses
or
conditional
uses,
or
something,
but
bottom
line
is
if
you've
got
some
boxes
to
check
to
allow
that
does
have.
That
does
have
some
merit
to
it,
but
it's
really
technically
not
a
variance
at
that
point
anymore.
Then
the
important
thing
is
you
gotta
treat
everyone
the
same.
The
equal
treatment
is
important.
G
There
keep
in
mind
when
you're
issuing
variances,
that
a
variance
is
an
application
to
break
the
law.
I've
heard
it
said,
before
variance
is
an
application
to
drive
75
and
a
75
mile
an
hour
and
a
55
mile,
an
hour,
speed
limit
or
vice
somewhere
along
that
lines.
You're
calling
the
Highway
patrolman
and
ask
letting
them
know
I'm
gonna
be
on
this
road.
G
Don't
pull
me
over
and
I've
got
a
really
good
excuse
and
really
that's
where
you
come
in
you're
the
board
trying
to
determine
whether
or
not
they've
got
a
really
good
excuse
and
they
may.
They
may
have
a
flood
plain
on
their
properties
too,
which
is
gonna,
which
you'd
rather
not
have
them
in
the
flood
plain
anyway,
or
they
may
just
know
that
if
they
do
that,
it's
gonna
cause
some
$10,000
more
and
they'd
rather
not
spend
it.
That's
where
you
come
in
to
figure
out.
Is
this
a
hardship?
G
That's
a
board,
buy
the
land
and
our
ordinance
or
is
it
something
that
is
really
not
the
community's
issue?
The
burdens
on
the
applicant
to
explain
it?
It's
not
for
you
to
come
up
with
reasons
for
them
and
I've
pounded
into
the
dirt
that
money
isn't
a
isn't
the
reason
for
it,
but
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
encourage
you
to
do,
and
I've
said
this
before
in
this
town
as
well.
G
G
If
there's
a
variance,
you
keep
issuing
clearly
it's
not
that
important
of
a
rule,
because
if
you
get
to
a
point
where,
where
you
look
at
it-
and
you
say
in
these
three
instances,
we
keep
on
having
people
come
in
and
we
keep
granting
this
variance,
you
may
need
to
change
the
rule
and
that's
really
what
what
that
comes
in
for
in
the
future.
Is
you
take
a
look
at
that
and
you
help
you
help
help
yourself
write
a
better
zoning
ordinance
and
I
I
always
keep
I
always
keep
the
headline
on
on
this.
G
This
slide
here.
The
avoiding
idiotic
variances,
which
made
me
feel
real,
comfortable
deceive
this
was
written.
This
Lane
kindig
was
I
believe
out
of
Pennsylvania,
with
the
American
planners
Association
made
me
feel
real
good
to
know
that
everyone
issues
variances
and
feels
like
the
issue,
several
of
them
and
that's
just
kind
of
a
planner
thing
that
we
see
that,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
do,
that
I
do
tell
people.
You
know
when
we
issue
them
regularly
it
we
have,
if
you're
consistent
as
a
board.
That's
really
a
major
key.
G
Is
it
if
you're
you're
going
to
be
consistent?
You
want
to
treat
everyone.
Similarly,
the
only
ones
you
issue,
I
mean
I'll,
give
an
example
out
of
the
county.
They
do
issue
quite
a
few
variances,
but
they
wind
up
being
the
same
request
as
what
they
are,
and
that's
one
of
them
that
I'll
tell
you
it's
one
that,
as
the
county's
re,
revising
their
ordinances
they're
going
to
turn
that
into
a
special
type
of
a
use
as
opposed
to
variances.
But
you
see
them
become
the
same
sort
of
thing.
G
That's
that's
where
you
see
some
of
them
so
anyway,
in
your
ordinance,
you've
got
specific
criteria
for
evaluating
them,
you're
familiar
with
them.
Well,
what's
important
to
look
at
you've
got
one
two
three
four
five
bullet
points
into
there
to
have
a
lot
of
sub
points
into
it.
These
are
and
doc.
These
are
and
statements
they're,
not
our
statements.
They're
not
I,
checked
one
of
these
boxes.
So
therefore,
I
get
a
variance
it's
all.
G
G
This
was
a
lot
that
was
planted
in
1910
and
it
was
only
four
thousand
square
feet
at
the
time.
Okay,
not
every
lot
has
that
problem.
You
know
everyone
else
may
have
nine
thousand
square
foot
Lots
variances
are
not
allowed
to
be
granted
if
they
allow
a
use,
that's
specifically
excluded
in
a
zoning
district.
That's
called
a
use,
variance
if
you're
issuing
use
variances.
You
may
as
well
not
have
zoning
you're,
basically
just
legislating
on
the
fly
at
that
point,
saying
that
I
can
sure
do
that
here
too.
G
So,
that's
why
you
don't
you
don't
do
that
you're
legislating
on
the
fly
of
the
proper
way,
if
you
think
it's
a
good
place
for
this
sort
of
use
of
it's
not
listed
step
back,
timeout
amend
the
zoning
ordinance.
Let's
let
them
do
it
doesn't
mean
never
ever,
shall
they
never,
but
it
does
mean
it
does
take
some
time
to
go
through
that
process,
because
it's
intended
that
the
community
gets
a
chance
to
review
whether
or
not
that's
a
good
use
for
for
this
district,
not
just
this
property.
G
You
need
to
review
whether
or
not
the
strict
application
would
deprive
the
applicant
of
any
reasonable
use
of
the
land,
and
a
loss
in
value
shall
not
justify
a
variance
within
your
ordinance,
I
kind
of
breezed
over
that
part,
but
depriving
the
the
applicant
of
any
reasonable
use
of
the
land.
That
the
point
is:
is
that
it's
it's
not
depriving
the
use
they
want
to
use
it's
it's
any
use
of
the
land,
it's
something
that
that
would
be
allowed
in
the
district.
G
The
other
couple
and
then
I'm,
going
to
back
off
from
from
being
so
luxury
here
shall
be
to
the
minimum
adjustment
necessary
for
the
reasonable
use
of
the
land
someone
comes
in.
They
want.
They
want
to
be
one
foot
from
the
property
line
because
they
need
a
42
by
58
garage.
Maybe
you
could
make
that
work
in
a
36
by
42
garage.
You
know
it.
The
minimum
adjustment
to
make
reasonable
use
of
the
land
I
would
argue
you
might
even
be
able
to
get
by
with
smaller.
G
But
the
point
is
it's
the
minimum
necessary
and
that's
really
where
you
come
in
as
a
board
to
figure
out
whether
or
not
it's
reasonable
or
not,
and
then
the
last
point
in
here
is
that
it's
in
harmony
with
general
purpose
and
intent
of
the
ordinance-
it's
not
injurious
to
the
neighborhood
or
detrimental
to
the
public
welfare
conflict
with
the
land
use
plan.
Is
it
in
the
character
of
what
we
intend?
This
is
owning
district
to
be
so
now
I'll
kind
of
get
into
this.
Obviously,
you've
issued
variances
before
this
is.
G
This
is
the
part
where
you
realize
we've
issued
variances
before
we
need
to
be
consistent
with
how
we
handle
things
to
a
degree,
but
in
the
same
breath
we
can't
just
go
out
willy-nilly
issue
in
variances,
because
yeah
I,
like
this
guy
or
this
really.
Maybe
this
should
be
the
rule
when
you
change
the
rule,
if
that's
the
case,
but
you're
always
going
to
have
some
and
there's
gonna
be
one.
That
goes
that
that
you
kind
of
wish
she
had
back
as
a
board
and
you
sit
on
that
board
long
enough.
G
You'll
wish
you
had
one
back
or
two,
but
the
bottom
line
as
you
do.
Your
best
be
consistent
with
how
you
handle
things,
and
you
do
have
I
mean
you're
on
the
board.
You've
got
discretion
to
review
whether
or
not
we're
your
own
definition
of
each
of
these
items
are,
but
that's
really
the
intent.
Is
that
really
in
the
the
basic,
the
basic
premise
on
a
variance
you
walk
through
the
door?
G
The
intention
of
the
ordinance
and
the
in
its
plainest
form
is
that
when
you
walk
into
a
meeting
know,
you
can
have
your
decision
already
made,
but
your
mindset
is
completely
different
when
you're
talking
to
variants
versus
a
conditional
use
so
variants
you
walk
through.
The
mindset
is
no,
unless
there's
a
damn
good,
darn
good
reason
for
it.
G
So
the
point
is:
is
that
you
walk
through
there
better
you
they're
gonna
have
to
convince
you
of
it.
Let's
switch
gears,
though
we
go
into
other
permits.
How
am
I
doing?
Okay,
we
go
into
other
permits
and-
and
we
talk
about
types
of
uses
that
are
out
there-
you're
just
getting
go
into
the
zoning
districts
and
just
point
out
in
general
in
your
zoning
districts
as
we're
looking
down
that
list
of
is
this
something
we
can
do
here.
G
We've
got
permitted
uses
which
are
those
by
right
uses.
Those
are
the
things
I
can
roll
out
of
bed
and
do
I
walk
in
I
asked
for
a
permit
as
long
as
I
meet
the
setbacks.
I'm
golden
I
can
do
that
accessory
uses
is
anything
that
if
I
have
X
it's
expected,
I
can
do
Y.
If
I
have
a
house,
it's
expected,
I
can
have
a
garage
if
I
have
a
gas
station,
it's
expected
that
I
can
have
a
filling
pump.
It's
those
things
that
go
along
together,
that's
the
customarily
incidental!
G
So
if
I've
permitted
one
I
can
expect
the
other
one
to
go
on
ice
cream,
shack
and
and
iron
smithing,
maybe
not
so
much.
But
the
point
is
that
there's
things
that
you
would
expect
one
with
the
other
permitted
special
uses
of
something
we
don't
see
as
didn't,
although
it
is
coming
back
a
little
bit
more
and
more,
you
see
a
lot
in
Sioux,
Falls
and
Lincoln
County
in
the
southeast,
and
then
Brookings
County
had
a
few
at
Brookings.
City
had
a
few
of
these.
G
D
G
Some
of
these,
where
they
have
to
meet
certain
performance
standards
to
get
a
building
permit,
even
as
a
permitted
use
and
although
unfortunately
they're
escaping
me
right
now,
but
an
example
would
be
perhaps
a
garage
of
a
certain
size
would
be
a
good
example.
They've
only
got
certain
criteria
they
need
to
meet,
so
that
would
be
the
best
example.
I
can
think
of
right.
Now
it's.
D
G
Permitted
use,
it's
got
certain
conditions
that
it
meets
if
it
meets
those
it
still
can
be.
It
issued
conditional
use
as
though
those
are
the
ones
that
you
see
they
are
uses
that
are
approved
by
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
but
they're,
subject
to
certain
criteria
in
certain
conditions,
however,
there
uses
that
are
allowed
in
the
district,
they're,
not
exceptions
like
we
used
to
believe
or
like
they
used
to
be
listed
in
ordinances.
They
used
to
review
them
as
exceptions
to
the
rule.
G
Well,
old
terminology,
it's
basically
it
well
frankly,
it
doesn't
exist
in
state
law
anymore.
We
have
conditional
uses
which
are
do
the
more
and
more
court
cases
we
see
they
wind
up
being
things
that
are
allowed
in
the
district
is
based
on
the
conditions
that
we
as
a
community
have
established
for
them.
So
if
there's
some
ways
place
means
we
don't
like
that
idea.
We
need
to
add
that
in
as
a
condition
as
far
as
where
they
need
to
go
so.
E
Luke,
are
you
saying,
then,
if
there
is
a
uses
listed
as
a
conditional
use,
it's
it's
generally
compatible
because
the
community
has
said
that
it's
generally
compatible
to
be
in
that
district.
Only
you
may
want
to
attach
conditions
to
to
protect
any
other
issues
that
might
be
in
affecting
a
neighborhood
yeah
I
mean.
G
That
that's
where
it
comes
down
to
the
the
fact
that
if
it's
listed
it's
something
that's
allowed
there.
We
made
the
decision
as
a
community
that
it's
compatible
when
we
listed
it
in
in
that
district.
If
it's
not
a
lot,
if
it's,
if
it's
something
we
don't
want
in
that
district,
we
shouldn't
have
it
listed
there,
because
that's
where
prohibited
uses
comes
in
if
it's
not
listed
in
the
district,
it's
not
something
you
can
do
there.
G
So
the
point
is:
if
it's
something
we're
willing,
if
it's
something
that's
Lissa,
is
a
conditional
use
its
compatible
already,
that
question
is
there?
The
compatibility
more
comes
in
to
the
palatability
is
the
way
that
I
refer
to
it
with
people
is
that
is
that
I
mean
you
do
have
discretion
as
a
board,
but
it's
very
narrow,
as
far
as
where
that
goes,
you've
got
to
have
a
specific
criteria
that
you
can
measure
a
measuring
stick,
basically
for
where
it
comes
in.
Who
I
got
some
fancy
animation
into
this
one?
So.
G
Bottom
line
conditional
uses
process,
they
make
an
application.
You
need
to
publish
notice,
at
least
ten
days
before
the
hearing
and
notify
adjacent
property
owners
here,
you're
sending
to
adjacent
property
owners
right,
not
within
a
certain
distance
I'm
looking
around
for.
Can
you
send
it
to
adjacent
property
owners
only
right,
okay,
but
there's
a
yeah.
You
have.
G
And
where
that
comes
from
the
notification
specifically-
and
we
hear
this
from
time
to
time
in
a
meeting,
I
didn't
get
notice
or
this
or
that
what
it
comes
in
is
the
communities
will
identify
how
they
go
about
doing
that.
This
just
comes
in
on.
Instead,
the
statute
11
for
21,
as
far
as
providing
due
notice
given
to
the
parties
of
interest
standard,
has
been
most
places.
G
G
Property
very
good
question:
a
conditional
use
permit
is
generally
for
the
property
itself.
So
what
we're
saying
when
we're
issuing
a
conditional
use,
permit
and
you're
kind
of
stealing
my
thunder
as
I
get
past
this
next
one,
but
I
think
it's
okay
to
jump
ahead.
The
point
is
we're
issue
when
we're
reviewing
this
we're
reviewing.
Whether
or
not
this
given
piece
of
property
is
okay
for
a
24
Plex.
Is
this
property?
Okay
for
a
24
Plex
so
mean
our
setbacks?
Is
a
density.
Okay
is
a
size.
E
Isn't
the
bigger
question
is
if
the
community
issues
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
gas
station
and
and
as
a
condition
of
that
I
build
this
gas
station
and
I
turn
around
and
sell
it
to
Megan.
But
now,
if
it's
not
transferable
Megan
has
to
come
back
in
and
maybe
because
I
was
a
bad
gas
station
operator,
the
neighborhood
doesn't
like
it.
So
Megan
can't
buy
that
by
making
that
happening,
you've
devalued
the
property
that
you've
issued
me
a
permit
before,
which
then
leads
to
down
the
road
of
a
possible
takings
issue
per
se
takings.
E
G
The
bigger
problem
is
it
and
it
could
be,
it
could
be
based
on
no
we're,
not
gonna
transfer
it,
because
Todd
did
a
bad
job
of
running
it
or
it
could
be
the
other
way
around
that
Todd's
not
allowed
to
sell
it
to
somebody,
because
they
had
a
problem
in
Maine
one
time
35
years
ago
and
they
cleaned
it
up.
But
you
know
we
want
to
add
seven
conditions
that
we
know
that
person
can
be
or.
G
But
that's
exactly
the
point
is
that
it's
a
long
way
to
get
to
your
answer,
but
I
mean
you're
you're,
issuing
the
permit
to
the
property
the
use
on
the
property,
not
necessarily
the
person
doing
it.
They
change
the
use.
Yep
we
come
in,
we
get
a
new
permit
for
it,
they're
doing
the
same
use
by
the
same
conditions.
It
makes
perfect
sense
to
keep
it
going
that
way,
because
you
really
run
your
risk
of
running
yourself
into
a
brick
wall.
B
G
It's
a
good
question
because
the
video
lottery
makes
it
tricky
because
that's
that's
also
tied
in
to
Department
of
Revenue.
As
far
as
how
we
do
it.
I'm
gonna
go
very
general.
If
the
use
is
a
permitted
use
and
they're
changing
to
another
permitted
use,
it's
fine
go
ahead
and
do
it.
If
the
uses
of
conditional
use
and
I
am
a
laundromat
casino,
not
a
laundromat,
casino
and
I
want
to
change
it
from
a
laundromat
casino
into
a
I.
Don't
know
what
else
would
be
allowed
in
that
district.
G
But,
let's
just
say
it's
a
let's
say
gas
stations
allowed
in
that
district
as
a
permitted
use
and
I
want
to
make
it
a
gas
station
casino
I,
don't
see
where
you
would
have
that
ability
to
change
that.
Because
of
the
fact
that
I
mean
the
casino
was
probably
the
conditional
use.
The
laundromat
was
probably
the
permitted
use,
they're
changing
the
permitted
use.
I.
Don't
know
that
you
would
be
able
to
do
that.
E
G
E
Long
as
as
long
as,
if
you,
if
you
attach
a
specific
condition
that
that
deals
with
transferability
and
what
the
requirements
of
transferability
may
be
other,
it
might
be
that
the
next
person
just
has
to
sign
off
the
same
agreement
that
the
previous
individual
had
when
he
was
issued.
The
permit
but
I.
Think
again,
you
need
to
be
careful
boxing
people
in
to
how
you
can
transfer
property,
because
we
still
have
all
them,
because
zoning
we're
dealing
with
property
rights
right,
yeah,.
G
I
mean
the
issue.
The
issue
is:
is
that
to
a
degree
your
are
you're
saying
that
laundromats
and
and
casinos
are
compatible
together,
and
so
then
you're
going
to
or
it's
one
as
accessory
to
the
other
essentially
can
like
the
whole
beauty
shop
and
selling
beer
at
the
same
wine
at
the
same
time
you
know
to
one
it
may
be
to
the
other.
It
may
not
be,
and
so
it
it.
It
does
definitely
have
credence
to
tie
the
two
together.
It's
another
one
of
those
where
I
would
caution.
You,
though,
is
that
is
it.
G
You
can
box
yourself
in
to
your
your
more
about
the
use
of
the
property.
Is
it
the
use
and
how
it's
is
it
run
the
same
way
as
you
had
envisioned
the
first
time,
and
so
I'm
barely
answering
that
question,
it's
what
I
would
say.
I
am
going
to
spare
you
the
lecture
on
statutory
authority
and
tell
you
that
by
statute
you're
allowed
to
define
what
a
conditional
use
is.
G
You
can
define
how
you
issue
them,
who
issues
them
as
a
community
and
what
they
are,
what
the
process
is
and
what
all
is
a
conditional
use?
You
look
it
up
in
state
law.
If
you
don't
believe
me,
the
conditional
use
is
in
plain
English,
it's
that's
where
we
went
we
went
to
and
you
pretty
well
going
through
these.
The
questions
that
you
had
asked
mark
answered
most
of
these.
That
I
already
pointed
out
once
the
conditions
are
met,
though.
G
Basically,
what
I
want
to
make
clear
is
that
I'm
going
to
reference
a
court
case
that
meant
to
forward
onto
your
attorney
as
well
ahead
of
time
here,
but
it's
a
court
case
that
went
on
in
in
Rapid
City,
but
what
went
on
in
there
is
it.
It
basically
takes
you
down
the
road
that
a
conditional
use
is
a
permitted
use
that
has
conditions
tied
to
it
that
the
board
reviews,
so
the
board's
got
the
discretion
to
determine
whether
or
not
these
conditions
are
being
met
and
I
mean
it's
a
little
they're
looser.
G
But
you,
you
also
need
to
provide
a
measuring,
stick
and
I'll
get
into
that
in
a
second,
but
the
standards
should
be
clear
and
objective.
The
approval
needs
to
be
based
upon
factual
findings,
because
you
are
a
quasi
judicial
board.
Your
board
of
adjustment
you're
supposed
to
be
making
findings,
but
once
the
conditions
are
met
and
the
proposed
use
is
supposed
to
be
allowed
as
a
matter
of
right,
it's
important,
though,
that
this
permit
is
issued
it'll
land
for
the
use
not
to
the
person
for
what
they're
doing
so.
G
G
G
2009
there's
a
case
out
of
Rapid
City,
in
which
something
that
you
could
hear
see
in
here,
where
they
denied
a
casino,
was
what
it
amounted
to
and
at
the
hearing
the
people
came
in
and
said
this
is
gonna
blight
our
community.
This
is
gonna,
be
a
start
to
have
an
a
casino
district
and
we're
gonna
have
we're
in
decrease
our
property
values.
So
what
happened
is
that
the
hearing
these
people
said
that
and
the
the
actual
applicant
provided
testimony
and
documentation.
G
That
said
that,
well,
actually
here's
where
our
casino
is
over
here
and
we
don't
have
more
casinos
and
our
property
values
are,
are
not
going
down,
so
that
hasn't
happened,
and
so,
ultimately,
the
city
wound
up
denying
them
anyway.
I
said
well,
no
we're
gonna
deny
you,
because
you're
gonna
cause
a
blight
and
you're
going
to
decrease
property
values
and
ultimately,
what
they
did
is
they.
They
said
that
they
denied
it.
G
The
only
conversation
they
really
didn't
say
this
is
why
but
they
denied
it
and
then
they
just
basically
read
their
fight,
read
their
rules
and
said
well,
it
doesn't
meet
our
seven
things
in
here.
We're
done
those
are
our
findings
and
they
walked
away
and
in
the
end
that
ultimately
got
appealed.
The
circuit
court,
Circuit
Court,
said
no.
G
How
does
this
relate
to
that?
A
little
more
than
repeating
the
ordinances
language
as
part
of
the
motion,
there
was
no
discussion
of
any
comprehensive
plan
or
its
objectives.
The
point
is
they
really
didn't?
They
didn't
tie
the
application
to
it.
They
just
said:
well,
here's
our
ordinance
and
no.
There
was
no
because
statement.
G
They
didn't
provide
any
evidence
of
diminished
property
values,
despite
the
fact
that
that
was
really
the
only
thing
the
court
could
really
find
as
a
reason
for
denying
it
because
I
was
talked
about
and
they
didn't
really
have
any
hard
evidence.
So
it
basically
says
and
I
want
you
to
read
all
of
that,
although
I'm
not
going
to
basically
in
general
the
definitions
that
you're
applying
cannot
be
made
of
differing
views
of
various
council
members
that
three
of
them
said
this
is
this
is
what
I
think
two
of
them
say.
This
is
what
I
think.
G
Well,
that's
good
enough.
We're
done
you
need
to
have
basically
what
they
said
and
literally
an
applicant
has
the
right
to
know
what
is
permitted
and
what
is
not
why
the
application
fails
and
what
can
be
done
to
correct
it,
and
we
see
that
around
I
bring
that
up
to
a
lot
of
boards
and
go
through.
Is
that
so
that's
fine,
if
you
want
to
say
no,
if
there's
something
they're,
not
meeting
that
that's
fine,
but
they
do
have
the
right
to
know
okay.
Well,
what
part
of
this
measuring
stick
didn't
I
meet
I!
G
You
know
I
I
need
to
have
six,
but
I
only
had
five,
what
was
I
missing
there,
and
so
that's
that's
where,
as
a
community,
when
we're
writing
these
rules
and
we're
writing
in
we've
got
this
use
that
use.
We
need
to
be
cognizant
of
what
are
the
things
as
long
as
they
check.
These
boxes
were
okay
with
in
the
end
here
that
it's
more
of
a
more
of
a
thing
with
the
need
for
findings,
but
the
council,
when
they
made
their
decision
again
appeals
appeals
of
the
Planning
Commission
to
go
to
the
council.
G
They
essentially
act
as
a
board.
In
that
case
they
made
it
with
no
factual
record.
They
really
had
no
record
other
than
just
here's.
The
copy
of
I
forget
what
section
you
have
you
know
21:02.
Oh
four,
one,
three
F,
here's
the
copy
of
that
section.
Basically,
what
they're
saying
is
they
handed
them?
The
copy
of
that
section
said
no
because
of
this,
and
that
was
they
really
didn't,
give
them
any
definition
or
indication
as
to
what
it
was
they
weren't
meeting
with
in
it.
G
So
the
point
is,
it's
basically
a
case
of
if
it's
listed
and
they
can
and
they
can
present
a
case
as
far
as
them
meeting
the
conditions.
You're
gonna
have
to
give
them
a
measuring
stick
as
to
what
part
they're
not
measuring
up
to
when
you
issue
the
permit.
The
part
about
the
conditions,
they're
continuing
obligations,
though
keep
in
mind
when
you
issue
this
permit,
it's
not
Todd
and
Megan
and
Markham
I
am
Jason
and
John
issuing
the
permit.
So
city.
G
G
Not
it's
not
just
the
people
sitting
on
this
board
and
that's
where
I
make
that
point
about
be
careful
if
you're
having
other
bites
at
the
Apple
have
a
clear
criteria
as
to
what
why
you
would
get
rid
of
it.
So,
in
the
end,
you've
got
these
sections.
The
one
thing
I
wanted
to
caution
you
on
is
that
ok,
so
I've
made
that
point
now
right.
You've
got
to
have
specific
criteria
that
you're
issuing
these
you've
got
your
general
criteria.
That's
2100,
202
to
b6
a
through
H
and
I
know.
D
G
Those
five
conditions
are
in
there.
Those
are
general
for
everything
all
of
the
conditional
uses
you
get
somewhere.
You've
got
specific
some
specific
criteria
set
for
like
home
occupations,
manufactured
homes,
Wireless
cell
towers,
specific
use
offices
which
I'd
really
like
to
have
a
conversation
about
some
other
day,
but
not
in
here
bed-and-breakfast
campgrounds,
there's,
probably
a
few
others,
but
those
were
a
couple
that
come
up
with.
But
what
are
those
six
bullet
points?
G
I
went
through
a
discounted
number
of
listed
conditional
uses
you
have
in
town
there
129
listed
conditional
use
is
no
granted
a
lot
of
them
do
duplicate,
let's
just
assume
they
duplicate
over
all.
What's
nine
of
your
zoning
districts?
That's
at
least
13
in
every
zoning
district.
That
means
you've
got
well
over
half
that
all
you've
got
to
go
off
of
are
the
five
general
things
so.
E
G
Exactly
what
I
would
say,
because
you
you
really
need
to
you,
really
need
to
hone
down
specifically
what
it
is,
is:
okay
and
what
isn't?
Okay
and
frankly,
some
of
these,
like
I,
said
I
was
looking
in
one
district.
I
think
we've
got
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
30
conditional
uses.
Ask
yourself
if
you
really
do
think
they
all
need
to
come
to
you.
They.
G
Might
just
be
fine
if
we
do
them,
you
know,
do
we
really
need
to
see
those?
Are
they
permitted
uses?
It's
just
one
of
those
questions
as
you
review
these
districts.
Well,
look
at
that
and
say
we
might
have
30.
We
only
need
six
of
them
or
maybe,
if
they
trip
these
three
buttons,
maybe
we're
we
don't
even
need
to
see
them.
G
So
it's
just
something
you
want
to
look
at,
but
you
you
rely
on
the
where
the,
how
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
and
I
think
you
I
think
everyone
on
this
board
is
familiar
with
the
fact
that
we
do
have
some
one-size-fits-all
zoning
districts
in
our
community
that
may
need
to
be.
They
may
need
to
be
split
up
a
little
bit
to
point
out
that
there's
a
specialty
here
that
this
is
maybe
okay
over
here,
but
not
oh,
not
okay,
over
there.
G
Well,
let's
not
do
that
by
variance
or
conditional
use
change
the
zoning
district
for
crying
out
loud
and
just
let
it
be
okay,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
look
at.
Is
we
update
zoning
ordinances
and
look
at
that
and
I
would
say
that's
a
sooner
than
later
thing,
and
so
I
could
happily
go
before.
E
G
Right
so
many
of
those
listed
are
duplicated,
but
this
is
one
the
other
uses
in
the
general
character,
which
is
one
that
I
know
a
lot
of
communities.
Love
to
have
and
I
can
tell
you
in
conversations
I've
had
with
some
private
attorneys.
They
love
them
too,
because
they
wind
up
in
court
over
them,
because
that's
essentially
making
your
legislating
on
the
fly
when
you
do.
That
is
what
it
amounts
to.
Is
that
you're,
saying
yeah?
G
This
is
pretty
much
the
same
thing
so
we'll
do
it
the
whole
intent
of
zoning
and
leads
into
a
longer
discussion,
but
the
whole
intent
is
owning.
Is
it's
prescriptive?
It's
saying
what
we
can
on
the
property
and
I
we
do
catch
grief.
Do
you
catch
grief
is
abort
staff,
catches,
grief
and,
and
everyone
does
that
well,
you're,
not
letting
me
do
that.
It's
not
listed
in
there.
G
We
understand
that
it's
not
a
listed
use,
because,
frankly,
at
the
time
we
really
didn't
know
whether
or
not
this
was
something
we
wanted
everyone
to
do,
whether
we
wanted
special
conditions
for
it.
We
really
didn't
know
until
it
came
up
what
we
were
gonna
ask
for,
but
once
it's
come
up,
then
you
go
through
the
process
and
you
actually
added
as
a
use
public
hearings
that
sort
of
thing
that's
the
process
to
get
a
use
onto
there.
G
What's
the
measuring
stick
on
my
other
uses,
and
so
the
point
is
that
my
suggestion
is
that,
where
you
see
that
you
should
no
longer
see
that
in
your
ordinance
and
I
do
know
that
that
does
make
it
difficult
makes
it
difficult
on
staff.
It
makes
it
difficult
on
on
everyone
from
a
timeframe
standpoint,
but
really
you're,
you're
you're
doing
that
legislating
from
the
bench
as
you
do
that
if
you
wind
up
having
those
other
uses,
so
if
I
can
make
one
recommendation
out
of
that,
that
would
be
one
of
the
first
things.
G
I'd
try
to
take
out
of
there
and
try
to
capture
what
those
other
uses
might
actually
be
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
the
decision-making
process,
which
I
think,
frankly,
is
probably
what
you
wanted
to
listen
to
a
little
bit
more
because
that's
gonna
be
a
little
more
interactive,
but
this
was
more
of
the
background.
The
conditional
uses
variances
101
the
next
time.
G
What
we'll
talk
about
is
hearings
and
just
going
through
a
meeting
some
ways
that
I've
seen
in
my
11
counties
and
our
offices
seen
in
our
towns
as
far
as
how
meetings
can
go
a
little
bit
more
smoothly
as
far
as
you
know
in
the
towns
handled
things.
Similarly,
and
it's
not
to
say
that
it's
not
working,
you
never
know,
but
there's
always
a
way.
Every
place.
I've
gone
has
said.
G
And
45
minutes,
because
again
this
one
is
probably
going
to
be
the
slowest,
otherwise
the
rest
of
it
it'll
be
more
interactive,
but
whenever
we
look
like
we're,
gonna
have
30
to
45
minutes
that
we
can
handle.
So
as
of
now
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
it'll
be
we'll
kind
of
watch
as
agendas
come
up
and
and
go
with
that
right.
H
B
G
With
the
specifically
with
I've
added
one
one
hour
to
my
previously
five
hour,
one
and
that's
the
pre,
that's
a
parliamentary
procedure
portion
which
all
can
to
work
through.
It's
something
that
I
I'm
a
geek,
so
I,
love
it
and
so
I
was
surprised
to
learn
when
I
was
in
when
I
was
in
agricultural
education,
major
that
that
wasn't
what
all
of
the
education
majors
were
into,
they
want
to
do
stuff
with
building
and
stuff
what
then
like
running
meetings
whatever
so
anyway.
D
A
A
So
the
two
options
that
they
had
were
either
if
they
were
interested
in
resuming
the
property
to
our
G
residential
garage
district
or
if
they
wanted
to,
if
they
wanted
to
eventually
do
a
single-family
home,
which
it's
currently
zoned
to
and
then
make
improvements
to
pheasant
lane
and
we
didn't
state
what
that
improvement
would
be
if
it
would
be
a
rural
section
with
gravel
roads
or
to
city
standards,
because
we
just
haven't
explored
that
we
just
want
to
get
their
intentions
with
their
property
and
we've
gotten
good
feedback.
I've
been
logging.
A
B
I
think
the
most
important
thing
from
my
perspective,
of
having
this
you
know,
come
up
a
feeder
of
times.
If
we're
making
some
progress,
I
see
Pat
back
there,
we've
built.
If
we
feel
ranking
some
progress.
You
know,
then
that
I
think
everybody
would
be
satisfied
with
that.
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
frustrations
before
it
didn't
seem
like.
There
was
much
movement,
but
you
know
I
feel
you're
going
in
a
direction
that
seemed
to
be
generally
consensus
of
making
some
sense.
Then-
and
that's
then,
that's
all
good.
C
C
B
A
And
that's
one
thing
too,
with
the
last
part
of
adjustment
meeting
when
Brittany
lumo
was
here
actually
two
meetings
before
that
she
had
approached
the
board
about
the
Planck
mission,
about
adding
their
being
able
to
have
an
employee
in
her
home
occupation
on
her
day
care,
which
then
we'll
look
into
and
then
look
how
it
handled
daycares.
If
it's
something
that
we
want
to
add
the
employee
or
if
it's
something
that
the
state
can
handle
with
their
licensing
or
we
will
be
addressing
that.