►
From YouTube: Public Works Finance & Safety Meeting 8 6 2018
Description
Public Works/Finance/Safety Committee agenda for 8-6-18
A
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
the
public
works,
Finance
and
Safety
Committee
meeting
of
Monday
August
6
2018,
and
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
So
motion
second
for
approval,
so
move
have
a
motion
by
solemn
and
a
second
by
manty,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
2
is
public
input.
This
is
a
time
for
anyone
to
come
forward
if
they
want
to
talk
about
something
not
on
the
agenda.
A
A
Item
number
3
approval
of
the
agenda:
is
there
a
motion?
Second
moved
by
Bill
powers?
Second,
my
wife:
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item.
Number
four:
is
consideration
of
change
order
number
three
with
donek
Inc
for
the
2018
sanitary
sewer,
replacements,
project
number
1808
for
an
increase
of
nine
thousand
six
hundred
seventy
dollars,
and
let
Colin
tell
us
what
this
is
about.
C
Yes,
you've
previously
seen
to
change
orders
for
this
project.
This
one
we
ran
into
a
couple
more
issues,
I
guess,
I'll
call
them
one.
We
ran
into
an
eighthinch
service
that
we
believe
to
be
a
six
inch
and
that
8
inch
did
not
run
into
a
manhole,
so
it
we
had
to
have
a
special
connection
there
and
they
had
to
run
up
to
Fargo
to
get
that
and
that's
where
this
cost
is
coming
from.
And
then
this
is
one
of
the
other.
Other
change
orders
was
putting
12
inches
of
base
course
in
this
one.
C
Instead
of
putting
the
full
12
inches
of
base
course,
we're
gonna
put
six
inches
of
millions
in
provided
by
the
street
department,
and
we
had
a
lot
of
extra
millions
this
year,
so
we're
gonna
they're
still
going
to
haul
and
weigh
load
and
then
place
that
those
millions
and
that's
where
this
this
total
cost
comes
into
and
then
we'll
put
six
inches
of
base.
Course,
on
top
of
that,
it'll
be
a
better
product,
probably
in
the
end.
Okay,.
C
C
A
A
Had
we
known
this
was
going
to
be
an
eight-inch
tap.
I
know
that
would
have
been
bid
out
and
it
would
have
been
more
expensive
because
that's
a
really
unusual
fitting
most
of
the
time,
an
8-inch
pipe
won't
connect
into
another
pipe
it'll
go
right
into
a
manhole,
so
they
don't
make
that
many
fittings
for
that
size
of
service.
We
would
have
gotten
a
bid
price
on
it
same
with
the
material.
If
we'd
had
known,
we
were
gonna
have
to
haul
out
the
material
we
would
have
bid
it
out.
A
A
A
E
A
E
That
area
there
are,
there
are
county
properties
that
abut
the
city
or
are
within
those
areas
that
that
joint
jurisdictional
area
that
would
not
in
any
way
even
come
close
to
meeting
our
our
city
standards
for
cleanliness
organization.
You
know
those
types
of
things
and
there
are
some
people
in
the
city
that
live
a
budding
to
the
counties
that
have
concerns
with
some
of
that
and
I
know.
There
are
some,
even
within
the
county.
I
had
a
call
today
from
somebody
within
the
county.
That's
concerned
with
that.
E
A
A
E
There's
I
think
there
is
a
need
for
that.
You
know
they
have
the
same
types
of
zoning
designations
as
we
do.
You
know
they
get
residential
and
AG
and
they
got
commercial
and
industrial
and
it
seems
to
me
the
biggest
problem
has
a
tendency
to
be
when
we're
when
we're
a
budding
residential
areas
and
there's
just
different
standards
there
and
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
one's
more
enforceable
than
the
other
or
what
the
issue
is.
But
there
are
issues
that
come
to
play,
we're
where
those
areas
in
the
county
just
are
unacceptable.
E
I
use
that
word,
but
it
really
is
to
either
abutting
neighbors
within
the
county
or
or
neighbors
that
would
be
city
residents,
so
I
think
we
should
see
if
we
can
take
a
look
at
coming
up
with
some
kind
of
standard
within
and
place
it
within.
The
joint
jurisdictional
agreement
would
be
nice
if
we
could.
Please
consider
it
anyway,
sure.
A
We
know
we
can
do
that,
no
problem
I'm,
not
sure
how
often
they
meet
or
if
it's
only
as
needed.
If
the
city
wanted
to
propose
a
change,
I
guess
we
would
take
it
through
our
system
to
make
it
considerated
considered
by
the
county
and
I
I'm
sure
they
would
be
happy
to
consider
it.
They
may
not
agree
with
it,
but
they
consider
it
damn.
I
was.
A
A
Because
it
is
the
enforcement
they
aren't
set
up
to
do
the
type
of
services
that
we
provide
in
the
city
limits.
They
don't
have
the
staff
we
have,
they
don't
have
the
resources.
So
if
we
would
take
on
the
responsibility,
they
would
probably
be
happy
to
allow
the
change
in
regulation
and
it
would
be
defined
by
where
you
are
right.
E
I
would
agree
with
that
I.
You
know
that
joint
jurisdictional
area
may
be
subject
to
different
standards
anyway,
so
you
know
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
at
least
have
the
discussion
to
see
what
the
issues
are,
what
makes
sense,
and
if
we
get
somewhere
it's
great.
If
we
don't,
then
we're
no
different.
We
are
today
so.
A
A
B
B
A
Should
be
following
up
on
complaints
because
we
do
have
staff
that
are
paid
to
look
into
code
enforcement
issues.
So
if
there's
a
violation
of
code,
we
already
have
a
set
procedure
for
deal
with
that
and
we
can
follow
up
on
that.
So
it's
just
a
matter
of
someone
needs
to
perhaps
lodge
a
complaint
so
we're
aware
of
it.
Yeah.
D
D
D
F
D
A
We
we
have
a
process
for
that.
If
someone
thinks
that
a
house
is
uninhabitable
or
should
be
condemned,
then
that
gets
reported.
The
building
official
has
to
take
that
very
seriously
and
that's
not
ever
done
lightly.
There
are
very
specific
criteria
that
have
to
be
met
before
a
structure
can
be
condemned.
If
it
meets
those
legal
requirements,
it
will
be
condemned
by
the
building
official,
but
it
you
know,
that's
a
last
resort
if
it's
possible
to
bring
it
into
compliance.
A
That's
the
first
choice
is
to
in
you
know
you
go
through
the
steps
you
notify
the
owner
of
the
deficiencies
and
ask
them
to
comply
by
a
certain
date.
Follow-Up,
and-
and
that's
you
know
if
you
I,
do
remember
you
I,
don't
know
where
what
the
status
of
that
one
is,
but
I'm
sure
the
building
services
department
knows
what
the
status
is
and
they
could
let
you
know,
but
there
you
can't
just
go
out
and
condemn
a
place
that
looks
like
a
dump.
You
have
to
make
sure
truly
meet
the
legal
requirements.
A
A
Exactly
so,
and
and
people
are
often
emotional
when
they
report
that
a
dump
should
be
torn
down
because
it's
uninhabitable
and
we
often
find
out
it's
really
it's
a
matter
of
maintenance.
It's
not
a
matter
that
it's
uninhabitable,
but
you
know
sometimes
absent
landlords
or
whatever.
That's
where
it's
ripe,
so
other
new
business,
all
right,
seeing
none.
There
is
no
need
to
go
into
executive
session
pursuant
to
SDC,
l1,
25
and
so
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
by
damn.