►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 4 15 2019
Description
Agenda items include Ordinance No. 19-03 and 19-04. Also included is Resolution No. 19-17 and 19-20.
C
C
B
C
D
A
House
all
right.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent,
agenda
and
I'm
going
to
move
item
16
and
17,
which
have
to
do
with
the
lake
cam
Pesce
trail
project
to
the
consent
agenda,
because
those
were
discussed
pretty
thoroughly
in
the
Public
Works
Committee
meeting.
So
with
that
change,
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
by
albertson.
Second,
by
Bueller
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
here.
A
The
second
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
public
input
time,
and
this
is
the
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
come
forward
and
do
so.
Please
state
your
name
into
the
microphone
before
making
your
comment
and
if
your
comment
is
related
to
an
agenda
item,
please
wait
until
that
agenda
item
is
taken
up
by
the
council,
otherwise
you're
free
to
speak.
So
thank
you.
E
My
name
is
Robin
Starkman
and
I
live
at
well.
I
live
right
next
door
to
cloud
9
bar
and
Casino.
My
issue
is
is
that
they
have
their
music
extremely
loud.
It
vibrates
the
windows
in
the
house
and
we
can
hear
it
and
that's,
including
having
TV
on
or
music
on
in
our
house
to
be
able
to
try
to
get
rid
of
the
noise
on
our
end
I'm
asking
that
there's
some
sort
of
agreement
that
has
to
get
made
either
the
bar
closes
down.
E
They
have
their
music,
where
they
have
it
no
longer
after
10
o'clock
at
night
or
they
need
to
buy
the
property,
because
it's
ridiculous
there's
grown
men
that
pull
down
their
pants
to
pee
outside
day
or
night.
It
does
not
matter
and
I,
don't
need
to
hear
it,
and
neither
does
my
two-year-old
or
my
14
month
old
and
my
two-year-old
has
very
high.
Sensory
needs
he's
that
old
enough
to
get
tested
for
autism,
but
it
does
bug
him
and
being
a
mother
and
I
am
due
in
July
this
year.
E
A
Is
there
anyone
else
that
would
like
to
speak
all
right,
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
comment
period
and
move
to
item
3,
which
is
approval
of
the
agenda?
Is
there
a
motion?
Second
for
approval
moved
by
Ville
Hauer?
Second,
by
y,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
posts
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item.
4
is
announcement
of
the
2019
spring
litter,
blitz
and
I.
See
barb
Brinkman
is
here
to
talk
about
this
so
barb
you
have
the
floor.
F
F
Okay,
we're
starting
it
today
and
running
it
through
May
first,
and
we
will
work
with
mother
nature
to
see
if
she
likes
those
dates
or
not.
Sign
up.
This
is
a
little
bit
here.
Different
sign
up
is
what
you
see,
but
then
add
forward.
Slash
right
up
here,
add
forward
slash
spring
litter,
blitz,
okay,
and
it
will
be
available
I'm
going
to
say
tomorrow
morning
go
for
it.
F
F
Look
at
the
the
map
or
the
zones
that
there's
a
list
of
all
the
zones
that
are
listed
available
and
you
choose
on
the
one
you
want
and
then
that
pulls
it
out
of
that
form.
So
nobody
else
can
can
choose
that
zone
to,
hopefully
that
works
that
nice
and
smoothly.
That
way,
you
can
then
print
out
the
injury
in
instructions.
Have
them
reviewed
with
your
group?
F
There
is
in
them
feet.
Do
the
cleanup.
There
is
a
little
a
site
on
arrow
Avenue
that
our
street
department
will
be
setting
up
and
let's
go
back
a
minute
to
give
you
know
you
move
your
trash
and
recyclables,
so
we're
kind
of
sorting
those
out
and
then
leave
the
unused
supplies.
They're
like
the
vests
and
the
other
bags
and
Reacher's
that
you
have
gotten
at
the
Watertown
Community
Foundation
Center.
F
The
directions
are
so
and
then
feel
like
go
back
on
the
website
and
do
the
feedback
that
will
enter
you
into
a
drawing
in
May
for
100
Watertown
bucks,
so
we're
still
very
thankful
for
it,
the
chamber
to
do
that.
So
we
pick
up
supplies
again,
reviewing
pick
up
supplies
at
the
Watertown
Community
Foundation
office,
and
if
they
are
not
open
phone
number,
is
there
they're
just
closed
on
good
friday
afternoon
and
and
Friday
Thursday
and
Friday
of
their
big
event,
and
some
excitement
has
always
been
had.
There's
always
interesting
things
to
find.
F
This
is
the
return
site
things
to
our
street
department.
Lots
and
lots
of
people
work
to
get
this
going,
and
so
we
appreciate
all
of
the
groups
that
that
that
faithfully
sign
up
year
after
year,
we
encourage
new
groups
to
do
this.
Take
photos
of
your
group
send
them
to
the
phone
number
we'll
use
them
and
the
litter
blitz,
reporting
and
publicity
and
the
feedback
is
important
to
help
us
plan
and
how
we
can
better
serve
the
city.
F
A
G
Like
to
put
a
plate,
you
heard
me
put
a
plug
in
a
couple
of
weeks
up,
but
I
really
would
like
to
put
a
plug
in
again
and
we've
got
dozens,
if
not
hundreds
of
groups
out
there
that
can
take
part
in
this,
and
everybody
does
a
little
bit
of
their
own
share
of
picking
up.
It
makes
such
a
difference
within
the
community
so
really
ask
for
community
support
in
getting
the
job
done
against
this
again.
G
F
A
All
right
item
number
five
is
authorization
for
the
finance
officer
to
issue
special
checks
to
BNSF
Railway
for
$750,
for
a
pipeline
license
and
$1,899.00
for
railroad
protective
liability
insurance
for
the
highway
212
construction
project.
So
look
for
a
motion,
second
for
approval
by
Roby
and
second
by
l'olam
and
Heath.
Would.
H
You
pre
it
one
for
the
license
that
allows
us
to
place
that
sanitary
sewer
pipe
further
out
into
their
property
and
then
two
for
a
required
railroad,
protective
liability
insurance
coverage
that
lasts
through
the
duration
of
the
project.
Essentially,
the
coverage
lasts
for
a
full
year
through
Matt
and
Chris,
and
we've
confirmed
our
current
liability.
Coverages
do
not
cover
what
the
railroad
requires
us
to
cover
for
working
on
their
property,
so
we
elected
to
go
ahead
and
purchase
their
insurance
that
they
offer
on
this
annual
basis.
Okay,.
A
A
Just
in
case,
you
know
that
works
okay.
Item
number
six
is
approval
of
alcohol
consumption
at
bramble,
Park
Zoo
on
May
21st
2019
for
the
Lati
cat,
think
big
conference
participants.
So
look
for
a
motion.
Second,
for
approval,
move
by
Bueller,
second
by
Y
and
Matt.
Would
you
please
explain
this?
Yes,.
C
I
J
So
I'm
not
sure
I'm.
The
expert
on
this
event,
Chris
PI
from
le
TI,
was
the
one
that
approached
us.
There
will
be
about
eighty
gentleman
here
from
all
over
that
are
part
of
the
think.
Big
program
and
they'll
be
having
a
conference
here.
It'll
be
after
zoo
hours.
The
zoo
will
be
closed.
Hopefully
it's
nice
weather
will
be
out
in
our
shelter
and
have
a
grill
out
and
they're
just
going
to
provide
some
wine
and
beer
for
the
gentleman
and
they
can
walk
around
the
zoo
and
just
visit
and
mingle.
I
K
L
A
A
Zappos
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you
item
number.
Seven
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19
17
resetting
the
on
sale,
alcoholic
beverage
license
fee
for
full-service
restaurants,
and
since
there
is
no
number
in
that
blank
I'll
do
some
discussion.
First,
that
acceptable
Matt
and
then
we'll
have
to
remember
to
get
a
motion.
A
specific
motion
later
and
I
can
see.
There
are
quite
a
few
people
in
the
audience
and
I
believe
many
are
here
for
this
discussion
on
resetting
the
on
sale
license
fee
for
full-service
restaurants.
A
In
order
to
allow
time
for
all
views
to
be
heard.
Please
try
to
limit
your
comment
to
three
minutes
or
less
and
try
not
to
repeat
what
has
already
been
stated
unless
it's
necessary
in
order
for
you
to
clarify
your
point
and
I.
I
have
received
literally
dozens
and
dozens
of
comments
on
this
through
email
and
social
media
and
text
and
I
think
it
boils
down
essentially
to
what
is
the
goal
or
purpose
of
the
city
in
setting
this,
and
if
we
are
primarily
looking
to
protect
the
existing
license.
Holders
of
the
full
license.
A
That's
on
restricted
is:
is
that
the
council's
responsibility
to
maintain
the
private
business
asset
market
value,
or
is
the
council
responsible
for
providing
the
paths
needed
to
promote
economic
development
and
new
business
opportunities
in
Watertown?
And
then
also
what
precedent
are
we
setting
with
a
council
action
designed
solely
to
protect
the
market
value
of
an
established
business
assets
with
regard
to
other
businesses?
And
if
the
council
acts
to
protect
the
existing
bar
licenses
at
the
expense
of
creating
a
market
favourable
to
a
new
business
development?
A
What
other
businesses
could
be
expect
to
request
similar
treatment
with
regard
to
their
assets?
And
this
is
you
know,
a
situation
that
we
didn't
create
this
problem
and
I?
Don't
think
any
of
these
council
members
enjoy
having
to
make
this
call
on
this?
It's
a
very
difficult
thing
for
them
to
do,
and,
and
it
is
I've
had
people
saying
you've
got
to
protect
me
on
one
hand
and
I've
got
people
saying
you've
got
to
provide
opportunities
for
people
to
get
into
the
market,
and
we
do
not
have
a
free
market
situation
not
because
of
anything.
A
This
council
has
done,
but
really
more.
What
our
state
has
done,
and
but
here
we
are,
our
10
years
have
passed
and
we
have
a
resolution
which
was
meant
to
last
ten
years
and
it's
now
expired
and
the
council
should
take
some
sort
of
action.
And
after
said,
you
want
to
say
something
Matt
in
addition
to
that
before
I
start
taking
comments.
I
C
I
The
the
previous
meeting
had
the
number
of
$100,000
in
the
resolution
and
that's
been
removed,
so
in
order
to
foster
discussion,
and
so
any
motion
that
is
ultimately
made
should
include
a
number
whether
that's
205,
to
keep
it
as
it
currently
is,
or
some
other
number.
We
should
have
a
new
motion.
A
new
active
resolution
on
the
books.
I
think
you
kind
of
you
covered
it
as
far
as
the
history
of
the
ten
years
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
right.
A
G
Like
to
make
a
comment
to
the
the
public,
I
saw
some
comments
directed
towards
the
mayor
and
and
the
council
that,
to
the
effect
that
we
were
trying
to
push
something
through
without
proper
notification,
etc.
I
want
to
show
that
what
that
is
absolutely
not
the
case.
This
is
the
what
third
or
fourth
and
fourth
meeting
Matt
puts
his
fingers
up.
G
A
Value
every
single
business-
that's
here
in
this
town
and
we
thank
you.
We
know
it's
not
easy
to
run
a
restaurant
in
this
town,
it's
hard
to
find
help
and
it
is
it.
This
is
a
big
issue.
It's
not
a
lot
of
times
a
high
profit
sort
of
business
to
have,
and
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
up
front
and
and
regardless
of
the
action
that
the
council
takes.
A
I
know
they
understand
that
too,
and
so
they
they
really
don't,
have
an
agenda
against
or
for
or
they're
just
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
for
our
community,
and
so
that
means
said.
Is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak?
Please
come
forward
and
say
your
name
into
the
microphone
for
the
record
before
you
speak.
N
Then
I
had
two
hours
to
think
about
it.
That
day
and
I
was
somewhat
emotional,
I
think
when
I
spoke
last
time
and
I've
had
two
weeks
to
sleep
on
it
think
about
it
and
actually
go
to
talk
to
2025
out
of
the
27
liquor
license
owners
in
their
concerns,
which
I
think
all
their
concerns
were
they
didn't
even
know
this
was
happening.
Almost
none
of
them
knew
what
was
going
on.
N
N
I've
been
in
the
business.
Many
many
years,
I
probably
have
my
liquor
license
almost
paid
for
and
I
get
different
beliefs
of
what
people
pay
for
these
liquor
licenses
and
I
spoke
to
everyone
behind
me
and
they
ranged
from
150
to
235
to
this,
and
that
I
think
we've
all
agreed
that
205
is
the
proper
number
and
many
of
these
people
I
think
there's
new
owners
I
have
a
nephew
sitting
to
my
left
that
just
bought
a
business
went
to
the
bank.
N
The
bank
borrowed
him
money
on
that
license
being
worth
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars.
What
is
going
to
happen
in
those
people
when
you
devalue
that
license
to
whatever
number
you
guys
think
it
is
this
day
was
a
hundred
thousand
two
weeks
ago.
Now
there
is
no
number
and
who's
gonna
make
the
number
the
unda
stree
makes
the
number
the
supply
the
demand,
the
leaving
of
restaurants,
the
coming
of
restaurants,
and
that
is
how
the
value
are
set
on
a
liquor
license.
N
I
get
that
same
thing
from
everyone
that
owns
a
business
behind
me
that
we
do
not
have
enough
staff
to
run
our
businesses
and
what
you're
proposing
will
not
help
that
situation
and
I
think
will
be
harmful
for
the
industry
and
I
think
will
be
harmful
long
after
you're,
not
in
office
or
anyone
elses
in
office
in
the
city
of
Watertown.
This
is
going
to
go
down
many
years
down
the
road
and
it's
going
to
be
harmful,
almost
25
out
of
the
27
license
or
mom
and
pop
organizations.
N
We
buy
our
cars
here,
we
buy
our
carpet
here.
We
buy
our
paint
here.
We
buy
everything
here.
The
resolution
you're
proposing
will
bring
franchises
here.
I
wonder
where
the
profits
go
from
those
of
Buffalo,
Wild,
Wings
and
Applebee's.
Where
did
those
owners
buy
their
cars
and
trucks?
It's
not
in
the
city
of
Watertown
we're
a
small
pop
and
cop
bring
unity.
N
We
need
to
protect
each
other,
and
that
is
what
we
do:
we're
22,000
people
and
we're
trying
to
offer
things
that
we're
not
population
smart,
wise
yet-
and
that
is
the
only
comment
I'm
not
going
to
go
on
here.
Those
are
my
feelings
is
this
is
a
bad
bad
idea
and
it'll
be
bad
for
the
industry,
not
just
the
restaurants,
not
just
the
bars
it's
going
to
be
bad
for
the
wheel,
end
and
all
the
other
restaurants.
We
have
two
or
three
new
restaurants
coming
right.
N
At
this
present
time
we
have
North,
Shore
building,
looks
like
he's
going
to
put
about
a
million
in
it.
I'll
stir
the
Waverley
accident.
I,
see
someone
building
a
very
nice
building.
That's
to
be
an
inventor.
We
have
the
gas
that
have
hundreds
and
thousands,
maybe
millions
invested
into
it,
and
they're
gonna
try
to
open.
N
So
we
have
new
businesses
and
we've
had
many
closed
the
last
year
or
two,
and
that
is
what
the
industry
is
about
and
we
do
need
to
direct
our
attention
and
population
growth
in
the
list
of
offering
more
liquor
licenses
is
going
to
hurt
not
just
the
liquor
and
bar
industry.
It's
going
to
hurt
the
industry
of
restaurants
and
everyone
through
the
city
of
Watertown
I.
N
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
that's
just
my
feelings
and
comments
and
I've
had
two
weeks
of
very
uneasiness
and
the
most
time
I've
owned
a
liquor
license
in
thirty
years
in
the
city
of
restaurant,
it
feels
like
the
city
of
Watertown
is
pulling
the
sheets
out
from
under
me.
I
had
to
sit
in
front
of
the
council
members
to
be
improved
twice
for
a
liquor
license
and
notice.
Now
it's
like
we're
gonna
change.
N
O
Hi,
my
name
is
Daniel
Shuang
I
am
the
owner
of
the
lounge
and
I've
actually
had
to
sit
and
think
about
this
myself
I'm
a
new
small
business
owner
in
town.
We
are
actually
just
a
beer
and
wine
establishment
ourselves.
The
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollar
set
rate
at
that
point
which,
to
my
knowledge,
I,
didn't
even
know
anybody
had
bought
one.
Yet
is
anybody
ever
purchased.
C
A
O
Didn't
think
so,
it's
just
a
pretty
outrageous
amount
for
someone
to
try
as
a
small
business
owner,
to
try
to
actually
go
out
and
get
themselves
just
for
the
liquor
license,
as
well
as
buying
a
business,
the
establishment,
the
food,
the
booze,
all
that
stuff.
So
to
me,
I
think
it
it
makes
sense
to
lower
it
with
a
hundred
and
five
or
the
hundred
thousand
I.
Don't
know
if
you
should
lower
it
that
far,
but
at
the
same
time,
free
market
place
on
the
liquor
license
that
are
in
town.
O
What
do
we
have
twenty-seven
I
think
I
heard
Rogers
say
out
of
the
twenty-seven.
How
many
of
them
were
basically
auctioned
off?
Probably
all
of
them
might
would
be
my
guess,
anyways,
because
I
believe
that's
how
you
get
them
the
auction
right.
It's
a
highest
bid
kind
of
deal.
That's
why
they
range
from
150
to
some
people
have
paid
two
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
for
them,
something
that,
in
my
fact,
which
to
me
is
that's
the
public's
fault.
That's
not
that's!
Not
anybody
else's
really
fault!
O
That's
just
that's
the
higher
value
of
the
market
who
ever
wanted
to
pay
the
most
for
it
to
go
and
get
it.
This
is
a
whole
different
situation.
I
guess
there
are
only
27
liquor
license.
You
can't
get
any
more.
So
for
a
person
like
me
trying
to
get
a
liquor
license,
you
would
have
to
either
rent
one
from
somebody
that
owns
one
that
doesn't
have
an
establishment
to
put
it
in
which
right
now,
I
don't
think
there
is
anybody
or
someone
would
have
to
fail
or
burn
down
or
leave
or
something
to
that
effect.
O
So
for
me,
I
guess
as
I
look
at
this
I
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
I,
don't
think
it's
going
to
necessarily
drop
the
value
of
someone
else's
liquor
license
because
of
the
fact
that
if
you
do
it
this
way,
just
for
the
other
business
owners,
like
just
say,
maybe
you
made
a
stipulation
on
it
to
where
I
paid
150
thousand
for
a
liquor
license,
but
it's
a
non-transferable
liquor
license.
O
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
sell
it
to
Joe
Schmo
down
the
way
I
would
have
to
keep
it
until
I
decided
to
go
out
of
business.
I
could
sell
it
back
to
you
for
the
same
exact
amount
that
I
bought
it
for
and
then
you
guys
ended
up
being
able
to
sell
it
to
someone
else.
Something
to
that
effect.
It
wouldn't
hurt
anybody,
and
then
the
value
of
everybody
else's
27
liquor
license
would
stay
in
the
same
generality
of
aspect
would
be
my
guess
for
me,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
O
O
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
and
I
think
whatever
you
guys
decide
to
work
for
the
public,
I
think
I
do
somewhat
agree
with
Roger
on
the
whole,
bringing
in
outside
places
like
Applebee's
things
like
that
to
where
they're
not
providing
a
lot
of
the
money
back
into
the
community
like
a
small
business
like
Foxy's
or
the
lounger
sparkies,
or
any
of
them
places
that
stay
local.
Do
all
that
stuff
like
we
do
buy
all
your
stuff
from
here.
O
A
You
I
would
like
to
clarify
that
the
license
that
we're
talking
about
selling
has
some
severe
restrictions
that
the
27
do
not
have.
You
have
to
limit
alcohol
sales
to
40%,
60%
or
more
has
to
come
from
food
and
non-alcoholic
beverages,
and
that
has
to
be
reported
every
year
or
the
license
is
lost
that
there
is
no
such
restriction
on
the
27
current
full
unrestricted
licenses.
P
Q
My
name
is
Becky
Sheryl
I've
worked
in
the
bar
in
industry,
restaurant
restaurant
industry,
since
I
was
14
years
old,
part-time
I
still
work
there,
I
currently
bartend
at
Sparky's,
so
I'm
not
an
owner
of
any
license,
but
this
does
affect
me
directly
and
I
feel
like
the
initial
proposal
was
made
with
good
intentions.
You
know
to
probably
promote
growth
within
our
community
I.
Just
don't
think
it
was
fully
thought
through
of
how
this
would
affect
local
businesses
and,
as
mentioned
before,
these
people
have
put
an
investment
into
their
liquor
license.
Q
They
put
that
money
towards
liquor
license
instead
and
that
investment
was
made
with
the
knowledge
that
they
were
limited
for
availability
and
the
mic
comes
back
into
the
community.
I
mean
you
have
all
of
these
locally
owned
businesses
and
people
who
have
put
up
that
money
for
that
fee,
which
is
nothing
for
a
Red
Lobster
or
al
back
Steakhouse
or
another
restaurant
who
would
come
into
the
community.
Q
And
you
know
you
had
mentioned
protection
earlier
and
I,
just
it
made
me
think
of
when
the
liquor
stores
were
protected
when
Target
and
Walmart
and
other
stores
want
to
carry
liquor
in
their
store,
and
it
was
voted
against
to
protect
the
local
owners
of
local
liquor
stores
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
know
how
you
would
determine
the
fair
market
value
after
I've
discussed
it
with
other
owners.
You
know
I,
think
$205,000
seems
fair
and
I'm,
not
even
an
owner.
I
just
know
all
the
investments
that
they've
made
into
it.
R
Jeff
Kaiser
Clifford's
steakhouse
again
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
we
did
make
a
big
investment
to
purchase
the
licenses
that
we
do
have
we
pay
interest
on
those
licenses
because
we
had
to
borrow
money
to
buy
those
licenses.
We
had
to
put
our
earthly
possessions
on
the
line,
the
houses-
you
know
you
name
it
whatever
you
got,
you
got
to
put
it
on
the
line
to
get
the
money
from
the
bank
to
buy
those
licenses
and
that's
the
investment
that
I
committed
to
to
make
sure
my
business
succeeded.
R
You
make
it
too
easy.
You
know
you
just
can't
make
it
too
easy
so
anyway,
there's
the
the
cost
of
the
interest
on
the
loan.
There's,
of
course,
our
annual
fees
that
we
have
to
pay
to
the
city
in
the
state.
You
know
you
name
it
whatever
other
costs
are
involved
in
it.
Our
insurances,
there's
a
lot
of
overheads
that
fall
into
the
responsibilities
of
operating
a
business
with
the
liquor
license,
and
you
have
to
be
very
responsible
and
very
diligent
in
what
you
do
for
the
safety
of
the
community.
Thank
you
thank.
A
S
S
We
bought
my
uncle
out
July
1st
of
last
year
and
when
we
bought
him
out
the
equivalent
of
what
we
pay
in
was
around
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
a
liquor
license,
and
that
was
just
why
first,
it
would
have
been
five
hundred
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
for
the
for
the
property
and
the
license,
and
the
property
sits
then
about
eight
380
390
right
in
that
area.
So
just
last
July
we
paid
for
it.
S
We
took
a
loan
out
on
it.
Just
like
Jeff
said
I'm
responsible
for
that
loan
I
was
totally
comfortable
paying
that
amount,
because
I
had
confidence
in
working
the
hours
and
running
the
business
and
doing
it
and
making
the
payments
on
it
and
I
know.
I
talked
to
the
bank,
our
personal
banker,
our
our
business
maker,
and
he
said
there
may
be
issues
that
arise
may
not
be
issues
that
arise
if
it
goes
for
$100,000,
that's
what
was
brought
up
last
time.
S
So
if
it
goes
down
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
I
know
it's
a
different
license.
I
know
it
has
stipulations
on
it,
but
there's
no
way
that
that
is
not
going
to
affect
the
cost
of
my
license
or
the
worse
I
should
say
of
my
license
and
there's
no
way
if
it
drops
down
that.
That's
not
gonna
affect
the
collateral
that
it
adds
or
holds
at
the
bank.
So
that's
just
one
of
my
concerns.
One
of
my
main
concerns
is
the
bank
and
I
guess.
S
A
T
T
You
have
the
old
people
like
us
on
this
side.
Who've
worked
our
tails
off
to
pay
for
it,
and
you
have
the
young
people
over
here
on
this
side
that
are
just
beginning,
there's
no
way
that
they're
gonna
make
it
if
the
city
brings
in
these
licenses
at
this
cost
I'm,
just
like
the
rest
of
you,
I
would
like
to
have
an
Olive
Garden
here
or
a
Texas
Roadhouse
or
whatever,
at
our
expense
and
our
disposable
and
a
night
to
eat
supper
at.
T
But
on
the
other
hand,
if
the
general
public
did
realize
what
we
paid
for
our
licenses,
I
felt
I
strongly
believe
that
they
would
back
us
a
little
bit
more
they're,
the
ones
that
support
our
businesses.
They
don't
understand
what
we
paid
for
it
and
how
hard
we
work
for
it.
So
I
really
strongly
believe
you
should
keep
it
at
the
205.
Thank
you.
Q.
A
U
Take
a
whack
at
it.
You
know
the
more
I
hear
about
it
and
I
appreciate
what
you
said
earlier
mayor
about
not
steaming
new
businesses,
but
I.
Also
look
out
at
these
people
and
and
I
know
that
these
people
have
put
blood
and
guts
and
tears
into
their
businesses,
and
we
do
have
two
more
starting
out
very
soon,
back
with
the
Goss
coming
and
and
Northshore,
and
that's
going
to
be,
hopefully
successful
businesses
both
of
them
and
if
we
do
open
it
up
and
and
lower
the
prices.
U
I
tend
to
believe
that
what
they're
saying
is
going
to
make
a
huge
difference
to
their
businesses
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there
are
a
whole
bunch
of
people
waiting
for
a
license
and
and
I
appreciate
what
you're
saying
straight
starting
off
and
maybe
liquor
is
a
big
deal
for
him
to
have
an
lunge,
but
I
think
we
really
have
to
watch
out
for
our
people.
U
A
You
I
sent
her
on
to
the
council
an
idea
of
offering
a
graduated
fee
based
upon
the
size
of
the
dining
area
for
these
full-service
restaurants
and
starting
with
a
very
tiny
startup
which
would
be
a
local.
It
wouldn't
be
a
franchise,
let
them
in.
Let
them
offer
alcohol
at
a
very
tiny
rate
and
if
they
expand
their
size,
they'll
have
to
come
up
with
the
ultimate
I
mean
you
could
set
that
size.
Whatever
you
want
but
say
you
know
less
than
500
square
feet.
That's
it
that's
a
hole
in
the
wall.
A
Somebody
starts
a
business
in
a
closet
somewhere
essentially,
and
their
license
is
$25,000,
but
then,
if
they
increase
their
dining
area
so
that
they
can
have
more
patrons
and
pay
for
more
of
it,
then
you
could
have
a
fee,
that's
higher
and
get
ultimately
to
that
205
for
a
small
franchisee
and
pick
whatever
size.
You
think
that
is
as
a
community
that
I
mean
if
you
want
a
business
to
come
in.
A
That's
one
idea:
I
had
a
lot
of
people
telling
me
they
wanted
to
see
local
businesses
and
we
want
to
spur
entrepreneurship
in
our
community
and
get
people
who
live
here
the
chance
to
get
started.
We've
seen
a
lot
of
restaurants
start
and
close
local
little
ones
that
just
can't
keep
their
doors
over
them
because
they
can't
sell
a
mixed
drink
and
it's
well
I'm,
not
a
restaurateur.
I
know
it's
really
hard,
but
I
I,
don't
know
what
the
business
is
but
I'm
guessing.
A
If
you
start
out
at
less
than
five
hundred
square
feet,
you're
never
gonna
be
rich.
Unless
you
can
expand
that
footprint,
I
mean
you
can
barely
even
have
a
kitchen
that
you
know
to
make
that
60%
food
and
non
alcohol.
For
that
small,
a
place,
you
don't
have
to
be
cooking
a
lot
of
food
and
if,
if
you
can't
make
it
you've,
you've
lost
the
twenty
five
thousand
dollar
investment
or
whatever
I
mean
the
council
could
set
that,
but
you're
not
competing
with
the
big
established
bars
who
can
sell
without
restriction.
A
A
So
if
you
give
that
option
for
a
little
place
to
open
up
at
a
very
small
price,
with
the
intention
that
if
they
did
expand
up,
they
are
gonna
pay
that
full
two
hundred
five
thousand
or
whatever
you
want
to
set
it
at
if
they
get
to
the
point
where
they
can
actually
compete
with
some
of
these
places
and
that's
just
healthy
competition
and
and
I
know,
nobody
wants
competition,
it
doesn't
matter
if
you're,
a
restaurant
or
a
dress
shop,
if
you're
a
dress
shop,
you
don't
want
another
dress
shop.
Of
course
you
don't.
A
I
just
I
have
a
lot
of
people
telling
me
our
climate
here
is
very
difficult.
I
will
add-
and
you
probably
know
this,
but
Aberdeen's
price
is
100
thousand
and
they've
only
had
one
sell
in
ten
years,
so
I
mean
if
we
set
it
at
a
hundred
thousand
I'm
guessing.
It
would
be
the
same
thing
here.
A
hundred
thousand
is
a
lot
for
a
little
tiny
hole
in
the
wall,
just
starting
out
business.
It's
nothing
for
a
franchise,
but
we
don't
have
the
population
to
attract
a
franchise.
At
this
point.
A
This
is
what
we
want
to
encourage,
would
be
entrepreneurship,
or
you
know,
as
somebody
who
is
just
trying
to
get
started
and
I,
think
that
that's
what
I
heard
is
nobody
wants
to
drive
our
existing
bar
businesses
out.
We
certainly
don't.
We
want
everybody
to
be
healthy,
but
if
we
had
some
options
and
could
at
least
have
a
pathway
for
people
to
enter
the
market,
they
may
be
buying
your
license
in
a
few
years
and
moving
in
when
you're
ready
to
retire.
Who
knows
so?
That's
just
my
two
cents
turn
on
the
microphone.
Please.
Okay,.
Q
Q
A
A
Q
A
A
A
Q
A
Are
gonna
lie
we
you
know
I'm,
not
gonna,
say
people
aren't
gonna
lie
and
where
we're
gonna
catch
them,
I
I,
don't
know.
That's
that's
not
my
question
for
tonight,
but
this
is
a
question
that
all
communities
in
South
Dakota
are
facing
because
the
ten
year
period
of
frozen
value
started
10
years
ago
and
we're
one
of
the
first
communities
that
passed
an
or
evolution
and
now
so
we're
the
first
one
that
has
to
address
this
issue.
A
J
I
I
Think
so
they
hadn't
they
had
the
choice.
The
minimum
was
the
current
fair
market
value.
The
minimum
was
the
average
is.
My
understanding.
Aberdeen
must
have
chose
the
average
in
my
discussions
with
them.
There's
30
licenses
in
Aberdeen,
which
is
well
over
the
1
per
thousand
amount
somewhere
does,
but
they,
the
market
value
of
the
full
on
sale,
license
up.
There
is
substantially
less
than
ours
and.
A
It's
possible:
the
free
market
has
determined
that's
the
number
of
appropriate
number
of
businesses.
I
mean
we're
not
going
to
get
a
flood
of
100
businesses.
If
the
market
will
support
27,
we'll
open
one,
one
will
close
and
that's
what
happens
and
if
we
have
a
available
market
for
something
different
and
something
different
comes.
It
may
not
even
impact
what's
already
there
it,
because
there
are
people
that
might
choose
to
do
that.
I
can
see
Glenn
wiggling,
actually.
G
I
Before
we
could
sell
a
license,
we
would
have
to
set
a
fee
a
new
fee
before
we
could
sell
on
these
licenses,
because
the
previously
set
amount
is
expired.
So
if
somebody
came
forward
tomorrow
asked
to
buy
one
for
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars,
we
would
have
to
set
it
at
two
hundred
and
five
again
in
order
to
sell
it.
So
that's
my
recommendation
is:
is
that
whether
you
set
it
at
this
at
a
lower
amount
or
205?
We.
D
G
G
I
think
I
know
the
answer.
My
last
question
anyway,
of
the
27
current
license
holders.
Those
are
required
to
be
active
licenses
right
or
operational,
whatever
the
terminology
would
be.
In
other
words,
we
don't.
We
don't
have
people
sitting
on
licenses
that
are
speculating
to
trying
to
sell
those
at
some
higher
rate.
Is
that
a
fair
statement?
They.
G
G
Guess
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
handle
on
what
kind
of
demand
there
is
is
in
the
marketplace
for
additional
license
of
some
sort,
whether
it's
restricted
or
unrestricted,
not
sure
I
got
a
definite
answer
on
that,
but
also
ask
the
question,
because
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
we
were
getting
talked
about:
leasing
a
license,
city
leasing,
a
license
out
and
I
understand
Matt,
because
we
are
a
local
option
community.
We
cannot
do
that.
Do
an
expert
because.
I
S
For
a
waiting
list
or
not
a
waiting
list
or
what's
going
on
I
know
here,
you
just
start
Harry's
right,
downtown
just
started
serving
hard
alcohol
within
the
last
year,
whether
they
bought
it
or
they
lease
it.
I,
don't
know:
Dakota
butcher,
Eastside
just
started
serving
alcohol
within
I
believe
the
last
six
months,
my
admit
within
for
sure
the
last
year
so
I
they
just
did
right.
S
A
A
A
C
S
A
S
S
A
S
There's
there's
not
a
waiting
list
that
there
was
a
waiting
list.
There
would've
been
on
demand
for
this
beforehand.
I
just
think
I,
don't
I
like
competition.
Competition
brings
out
the
best
in
everybody.
It
really
does,
but
there's
no
reason
that
some
people
should
be
able
to
come
in
for
half
the
price
that
I
did.
C
S
Would
have
to
sit
down,
TRADOC
would
I
I
would
not.
Maybe
it
depends.
We're
sit
when
we
opened
up
and
Roger
brought
this
up
two
weeks
ago
about
when
you
open
up
an
establishment,
it
may
change
for
what
it
is
not
completely.
But
when
we
opened
up,
we
were
60%,
liquor,
sell
liquor
and
beer.
We
were
40%
38%
food
in
the
first
year,
I
believe
in
the
last
four
years,
or
so
we've
been
over
60
or
right
at
60.
Their.
A
S
Appreciate
that
you
want
to
keep
them
good,
we
just
you
know,
competitions
getting
another
example
about
a
liquor
license
and
people
failing
because
they
can't
sell
alcohol
is
false,
Harry's
opened
up
and
they
did
not
serve
alcohol
until
the
last
six
months.
Let
me
tell
you
right
now:
they
put
a
dent
in
our
business,
they
did
and
good
for
them.
They
did
a
great
job
with
it,
but
we
are
now
back
ahead
of
where
we're
before
competitions
a
great
thing
and
they
didn't
need
a
liquid
license
to
do
it.
R
Yeah
Jeff
from
Clifford's,
just
you
know
talking
about
being
first,
you
know
when
I
decided
to
quit
the
factory
life
and
start
my
business
and
Uptown
Watertown,
my
heart
was
in
it
a
hundred
percent
and
I
bought
an
old
building,
I
fixed
it
up.
I
started
out
with
a
beer
and
wine
license
in
a
small
space
like
you're,
referring
to
I
worked
my
tail
off
I
saved
money.
I
got
to
know
my
banker
real
well
and
and
I
was
able
to
finance
a
full
liquor
license.
That
is
a
commitment
I
made
to
my
business.
R
X
On
one
hand,
I
don't
disagree
with
that.
On
the
other
hand,
we
cannot
forget
that
these
are
distinctly
different
licenses
and
I'm,
not
in
that
business.
But
I
will
tell
you
that
if
I've
got
two
hundred
and
five
for
unrestricted
or
205
for
a
restricted,
I
know
which
one
I'm
gonna
go
by,
they
are
not
the
same
license.
There
are
issues
and
there
are
much
greater
risks
in
there.
I,
don't
I,
don't
believe
in
the
hundred
thousand
okay,
but
I,
don't
believe
in
the
two
hundred
five
thousand
either,
because
there
is
a
difference.
O
Wom
from
the
lounge
I,
just
I,
guess
I
had
a
question
on
a
couple
of
stipulations
on
that
liquor
license
as
well,
so
if
per
se
I
did
buy
one
for
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
I
had
my
food
sales
at
sixty
sixty-five
percent
thirty
five
percent
alcohol
by
the
time
five
months
went
by
my
liquor.
Sales
were
raised
above
my
food
sales,
because
now
I'm
selling
alcohol
I
went
from
35
to
70
percent
alcohol.
To
you
know
thirty
percent
food.
Do
you
guys
take
the
license
back
then?
O
N
N
N
You
know
I've
sat
over
here
and
a
lot
of
the
statements
I'm
hearing
from
out
ears,
like
wow
wow,
a
little
hole
in
the
wall.
They
can
start
up
for
twenty
five
thousand,
because
someone
thinks
it's
a
good
idea.
It
costs
you
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars
to
get
in
the
Lincoln
understa
business,
and
no
one
up
here
should
be
involved
in
it.
It's
been
set
by
the
state-
and
it's
been
this
way
for
how
many
years
Nelson
they
put
this
loophole
in
this
law.
N
N
27
of
us
sit
right
here,
have
the
possibility,
whose
2.7
million
dollars
they
are
not
the
same
license,
but
they
compete
against
you
the
same
way
and
we're
not
thinking
of
that.
We're.
Not
thinking
of
that
you're
asking
us
to
take
a
big
hit
here
and
we
should
just
leave
it
at
205
and
let
it
go
the
way
it
has
been.
It's
not
broken,
and
no
one
here
has
to
fix
it.
Thank
you.
Thank.
X
X
X
If
I
could,
if
I
could,
what
I
would
ask
is
I
would
want
to
have
every
license
holder.
I
would
like
to
know
when
you
bought
your
license
and
how
much
you
bought
it
for,
because
that's
the
kind
of
detail
that
enables
me
to
make
a
decision
I
understand
that
that's
that's
private,
confidential
information
right
I
understand
that,
but
without
that
information.
X
At
least
for
me,
I'm
more
apt
to
make
a
bad
decision
without
having
the
detail
in
front
of
me.
You
know
I
offered
anywheres
from
150
to
220
five
I,
don't
out
of
the
27
licenses
their
economy,
how
many
of
them
were
at
the
150
mark
I.
Don't
know
that
those
are
that's
important
detail
for
us
to
try
to
figure
out
what
is
fair
again
if
we
don't
want
the
businesses
here
that
our
vote
should
be
to
scrap
the
ordinance
altogether.
X
But
if
we
do,
if
we
have
that
that
we
want
that
opportunity,
my
my
job
here
Roger
is
not
to
protect
any
given
industry,
because,
if
that's
the
case,
then
our
industrial
parks
are
going
to
ask
us
not
to
bring
people
into,
because
it
takes
workers
away
from
them
or
hotels.
We
don't
need
more
hotels,
I
mean
every
industry
is
gonna,
say
I'm
having
problems
getting
people
don't
bring
any
more
people
and
any
more
businesses
into
town.
That's
not
my
job.
My
job
is
to
try
to
bring
businesses
into
town
now,
I,
don't
believe
anyway.
X
I,
don't
believe
we're
out
soliciting
restaurants
or
bars
or
section
to
open
up
in
our
community
that
that's
pretty
much
a
a
somebody's
going
to
decide
to
do
it
or
they're
not,
but
is
there
a
willingness
to
show
us
in
a
confidential
manner
when
you
bought
your
license
and
what
you
paid
for
that
license?
Is
there
a
willingness
in
order
for
us
to
get
better
information?
Is
there
a
willingness
for
the
license
holders
in
here
to
share
that
confidentially
with
us,
because
that
would
help
me
get
really?
X
What
because
again
I
want
to
get
to
a
point?
That's
that's
right
and
fair.
I
don't
want
to
restrict
business.
That's
not
my
job
and
but
I
want
to
try
to
make
a
right
decision.
So
I
I,
don't
even
know
how
many
people
out
here
raise
your
hand
if
you
represent
a
license.
I
now,
there's
more
than
one
of
you
here
from
a
business
okay,
so
we've
got
a
dozen
of
you
out
there.
X
Because
I
don't
know
about
the
other
council
members,
but
I
know
that
would
be
very,
very
beneficial
to
me
and
if
there
is
that
willingness
to
do
that,
my
suggestion
tonight
is
is
that
we
vote
to
leave
it
after
2:05.
We
take
the
time
to
get
that
information.
We
consider
other
options
and
to
see
what
makes
sense
and
we
come
back
at
this,
but
I
do
that's.
My
recommendation
is
that
we
we
make
a
motion
to
approve
it
at
the
continuation
of
the
205
and
continue
our
homework.
Y
We
just
like
to
ask
Mike
a
question
clarifying
what
information
you're
looking
for.
Are
you
looking
for
it
in
terms
of
the
investment
I
mean
I?
Don't
disagree
with
you
I'm
just
I'm,
just
trying
to
figure
this
out
is
the
idea
of
knowing
what
was
paid
and
what
the
value
is
now.
Is
that
an
idea
of
looking
at
how
its
raised
in
value
I?
Don't.
X
Those
are
the
two
honestly,
the
other,
only
little
bit
information
out
there,
the
name
I'd
like
to
really
know
whether
you
bought
it
directly
from
the
city
through
a
bid
process,
auction
process
or
whether
you
bought
it
through
another
license
holder.
Those
are
the
three
bits
of
information
that
I
would
like
to
have.
U
I
have
a
question
for
you
in
Aberdeen,
and
maybe
you
don't
know
the
answer
to
this
Aberdeen.
Has
these
hundred
thousand
dollar
licenses
that's
what
they
paid?
Do
they
have
other
people
like
the
folks
sitting
in
the
audience
here
that
are
saying?
Oh,
my
gosh,
we
paid
two
hundred
thousand
and
now
Aberdeen
changed
it
to
a
hundred
thousand
or
has
a
hundred
thousand
always
been
the
benchmark
for
Aberdeen.
U
I
Understanding
is
that
the
hundred
thousand
has
been
the
benchmark
from
the
inception
of
the
ordinance.
So
what
the
city
attorney
up
there
is
is
relatively
new,
so
he
wasn't
around
when
they
did
this.
But
his
impression
is
that
the
market,
at
the
time
for
on
sale
licenses
was,
was
around
that
hundred
thousand
dollar
mark.
There's
thirty
I
know
that
there's
thirty
regular
on
sale
licenses
in
Aberdeen.
Y
One,
of
course,
is
the
competition
part
of
it,
but
there
always
was
an
adage
and
development
that
if
there
was
a
successful
convenience
store
in
one
corner,
eventually
there
were
before
successful
convenience
stores
on
every
corner
or
on
all
corners.
But
I
don't
know
if
that's
true
anymore,
I
think
to
Dan's
point
about
losing
the
license
if
he
switched
his
food
to
liquor
percentage.
Okay.
So
now
that
would
not
happen
to
an
unrestricted
license.
Correct
right.
C
Y
Y
And
they
don't
have
to
report
any
of
that,
whereas
somebody
who
buys
a
restricted
license
has
to
not
only
report
their
percentage
of
alcohol
and
liquor
sales.
If
they
should
change
that
percentage,
they
would
be
out
purely
out
that
money
that
they
originally
invested
into
that
the
restricted
license.
Okay,
so
I
just
I
need
to
make
sure
that
everybody
understands
that
that
there
is
some
significant
advantages
on
that
unrestricted
license
in
terms
of
the
reporting,
the
value
of
the
license.
Y
How
long
you
can
hold
it
if
you
can
hold
it
and
I'm,
not
saying
that
any
of
you
didn't
work
hard,
but
I'm,
saying
that
that
a
young
man
like
Dan
is
working
hard
too
he's
he's,
purchased
a
building,
a
business
he's
working
at
it.
He
made
another
thing
available
for
us,
downtown,
I'm,
sorry
I'm
picking
on
you
Dan,
because
you
just
have
to
know,
but
so
so
I'm
I
think
I
see
his
point
very
clearly.
Y
He
would
love
to
probably
get
into
a
different
level
of
his
business,
but
as
a
start-up
there's
no
way
you
can
afford
that
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars
license.
That's
risky
I
mean
you
could
potentially
lose
it
correct,
I'm,
saying
something:
that's
correct
right,
so
so
I
think
that
you
know,
if
you
take
all
the
start-up
costs,
I,
don't
know
that
a
person
who
had
to
pay
100
or
150
or
whatever
that
investment
was
would
have
any
less
I,
mean
I'm,
sure,
there's
other
people
who
yeah
they
could
walk
in
the
door.
Y
You
know
that
nobody
wants
to.
Like
Mike
said
you
know,
nobody
wants
to
see
more
businesses
coming
in,
but
or
you
said
that
I
guess,
but
that's
not
always
the
case.
Sometimes
traffic
increased.
So
if
we
had
several
more
smaller
restaurants
and
herb
and
stuff
downtown
I
think
the
foot
traffic
generated
downtown
would
actually
be
good
for
everybody.
Y
Iii
really
believe
that
that
that
there's
a
people
like
to
be
where
other
people
are
so,
if
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
a
neighborhood
in
a
business,
district
or
entertainment,
district,
more
people
are
going
to
want
to
come
they're
both
customers
and
developers.
So
I
I,
don't
know
what
the
right
price
is,
but
I
don't
think
it
should
be
205
either.
The
fact
that
we
haven't
sold
any
at
all
I
kind
of
go
back
to
my
explain.
Y
If
you,
if
that's
the
case,
then
you
know
I,
have
it,
but
I
just
want
to
remind
people
that
the
person
with
the
unrestricted
license
does
not
have
to
keep
track
of
their
sales
does
not
have
to
can
keep
it
for
whatever
they
want,
sell
it,
for
whatever
the
market
value
is
the
other
one
would
have
to
surrender
it
if
it
were
flopped
and
they
can't
there's
a
video
lottery
component
to
it
too.
Isn't
there
no.
V
W
C
Y
Notes,
no,
but
so
putting
that
out
there
for
thought
you
know
and
realizing
that
not
only
are
we,
but
all
of
you
are
in
a
difficult
situation.
I
just
would
I
I
do
believe
and
I
agree
with
the
mayor
that
our
role
is
to
both
support
the
businesses
we
have,
but
to
also
offer
opportunities
for
other
people
to
develop
a
business.
A
I
Would
have
to
do
some
follow-up
research
on
that,
the
original
information
that
was
provided
to
us
nowhere
in
the
statute
to
say
that
that
information
was
confidential
if
we
work
because
this
would
be
a
voluntary
providing
of
information
by
the
the
owners
of
the
licenses.
Oh,
that's
a
research
to
see
yeah.
Z
You
know
I,
don't
feel
comfortable.
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
tonight
to
make
a
decision
on
a
monetary
value
for
one
of
these
things
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
other
questions
I
think
that
needs
to
be
answered
for
us
is
what
kind
of
demand
would
there
be
what
what
opportunities
are
out
there
if
say
we
sold
one
of
these
for
fifty
thousand
two
hundred
thousand
will
be
the
opportunities
for
us
for
development.
Z
If
we
sold
between
a
hundred
and
two
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars,
I,
don't
know
that
I
would
like
more
information,
some
more
some
better
idea
as
to
what
the
development
opportunities
they're.
Not
there,
then
to
me
that's
a
moot
point
I
think
I,
like
Mike's
idea
of
getting
a
true
market
value
of
what
these
things
are
worth
right
now.
I
think
that's
good,
but
I,
don't
think
in
my
opinion,
I
don't
have
enough
information
tonight.
I
would
definitely
like
and
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
where
we
get
that
you
know
maybe
Chris.
Z
Maybe
somebody
else
can
can
answer
to
that
question.
Julie
I
don't
know,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
get
some
input
in
that
regard
before
we
keep
pushing
forward
of
this,
because
if
we're
gonna
pick
up
a
big
fight
here
or
draw
a
line
or
put
a
number
down,
we
should
at
least
have
the
information
we
needed
for.
G
Man
that
the
resolution
that
you
drafted
for
us
has
the
amount
blank
and
then
said
and
said
and
said
he
shall
remain
in
effect
until
further
action
by
the
City
Council.
Can
we
specify
a
date
in
the
resolution
rather
than
keeping
it
open,
ended
like
this,
but
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
I'd
like
to
propose
that
we
keep
it
at
the
205.
G
But
let's,
let's
put
a
death
on
a
date,
so
we
and
then
in
the
meantime,
gather
the
information
that
we're
asking
for
and
then
at
that
point
will
force
us
to
make
a
decision
or
take
action
again
after
reviewing
the
topic,
so
I
guess,
I
I
threw
out
205
with
using
July
first
as
a
as
an
end
date
on
this,
and
you
know
see
we're
at
at
that
point.
Give.
I
I
X
Don't
mind
having
an
end
date,
but
to
me
it
doesn't
make
sense,
pass
the
2:05
and
we
the
work
on
it
or
we
don't
work
on
it.
We
need
to
come
up
with
something
where
we
don't.
You
know
that
that's
our
effort,
we,
why
not?
Why
put
a
deadline
on
it?
Because
we
might
sit
here
three
months
from
now
I'm,
not
ready,
because
we
don't
do
that
with
any
other
ordinance.
I
understand.
G
That,
but
but
Mike
this
is
to
be
the
topic
total
that
drag
on
indefinitely,
both
for
those
that
are
in
favor
one
way
or
the
other.
That's
why
I
think
by
putting
in
India
is
going
to
force
us
to
take
action
one
way
or
the
other.
Maybe
we're
not
going
to
be
any
better
position
at
that
point
Mike,
but
I,
but
I'd
like
to
have
us
use
that
as
an
alarm
clock
as
the
mayor
refers
to
it
as
as
a
point
that
would
force
us
to
address
it
again,
I
would.
A
Like
to
say
to
I,
I
did
receive
a
lot
of
input
and
it
was
heavy
on
both
sides
actually
for
those
restaurant
owners,
I
have
to
tell
you,
it
was
heavier
on
the
lower
the
price
size
than
it
was
on.
Keep
it.
In
fact,
almost
no
one
said
keep
it
the
same
very
few,
a
few
did
most
said,
lower
it
and
most
a
lot
of
them
said.
Please
don't
reveal
my
name
because
they're
my
buddy
they're,
my
client
they're,
my
neighbor
they're.
A
You
know
whatever
that
you're
part
of
our
community
and
we
don't
want
to
hurt
your
feelings.
We
love
you.
We
want
you
to
stay
in
business
and
continue
to
thrive,
but
actually
having
the
ability
for
someone
else
to
have
a
chance
to
do
what
you
do
is
going
to
make.
You
tighten
your
belt
a
little
bit
and
I
know
that's
uncomfortable.
A
But
if
you
have
more
restaurants
in
town,
it's
harder
for
the
existing
restaurants,
then
if
you
don't,
you
have
to
put
a
little
money
into
your
place,
make
it
a
little
nicer,
because
you
got
to
work
a
little
harder
to
keep
the
same
clientele
and
I.
Get
that
hurts!
That's
what
you
don't
want
it's
hard
enough
as
it
is,
and
that
probably
would
tip
some
over
to
the
point
where
they
can't
continue
and
I
get
that
fear.
I.
Don't
think
the
council
wants
to
do
that
to
anybody
so
I'm.
Just
so.
X
A
A
L
A
X
U
M
A
I
I
just
heard
from
a
lot
of
people.
They
want
to
be
able
to
spark
entrepreneurship
in
our
community.
How
can
we
help
the
little
guy
who
doesn't
have
a
huge
capital
to
get
started
and
there
you
know
they
that
being
able
to
sell
booze
for
whatever
reason
in
our
society
matters
it
matters
makes
a
big
difference.
D
D
A
D
L
A
Z
C
C
A
Moving
along
are
we
back
on
okay
item
number:
eight
is
approval
of
resolution
number
19-20
to
amend
the
major
street
plan
to
designate
18th
Avenue
North
East
as
a
minor,
collector,
Street
subject
to
all
planning
requirements,
so
look
for
a
motion,
second
for
approval
by
Mantee
and
second
by
Bueller
and
I'll.
Ask
Heath
to
please
explain
this.
Thank.
H
You,
madam
mayor
I,
am
a
little
bit
saddened.
I,
don't
have
quite
the
captive
audience,
I'm
gonna
forward
with
this
as
necessary,
so
the
city
per
state
statute
is
required
to
maintain
a
what's
called
a
major
street
plan
and
in
that
major
street
plan
are
our
major
streets,
and
routes
are
categorized
as
arterials
and
collectors
and
and
classifications
of
that
nature.
H
That
major
street
plan
is
also
adopted
into
our
comprehensive
land
use
plan
and
becomes
part
of
that
document
as
well.
The
comp
plan
is
in
the
current
process
of
being
updated
and
we
hope
to
have
that
done
in
the
next
few
months
here
as
far
as
bringing
a
final
draft
forward
to
the
council
after
going
through
Planning
Commission
readings.
H
H
This
document
here
shows
what
our
map
will
actually
look
like
and
be
emitted.
This
is
18th
Avenue
and
the
reason
for
the
application
to
come
forward.
They
wanted
this
18th
Avenue
be
identified
as
a
collector
route.
They
have
particular
land
ownership
along
this
route
that
they
in
order
to
do
certain
amounts
or
developments
on
those
Lots.
It
has
to
be
adjacent
to
a
collector
route.
H
H
Those
are
based
on
common
ash
tool
criteria,
the
American
Association
of
state
transportation,
highway
officials,
as
well
as
other
engineering
traffic
design
criteria,
and
in
reviewing
that
staffs
review
of
that,
we
did
agree
that,
yes,
18th
Avenue
should
be
classified
as
a
collector
route
and
we
supported
the
application
from
the
citizen.
The
landowner
to
the
Planning
Commission
level
and
the
Planning
Commission
subsequently
passed
unanimously
to
make
this
modification
to
the
major
street
plan
for
the
city.
A
Won't
change
what
happens
in
that
neighborhood
what's
happening
in
that
neighborhood
is.
This
is
acting
like
a
minor
collector
already
if
it
were
a
new
minor
collector
with
no
development.
Next
to
it,
we
would
be
restricting
access
onto
it,
but
like
a
lot
of
our
collectors
in
town,
they
already
have
driveways
on
them
and
we
just
live
with
it.
But
when
new
development
comes
like
east
and
west
of
there,
we
would
keep
that
in
mind
with
the
platting
and
we
would
probably
restrict
access
from
driveways
and.
H
I
apologize,
I,
don't
have
a
definitive
list
here
in
front
of
me.
I,
don't
know
Brandi
if
you
have
reference
to
it,
but
some
of
the
other
streets,
like
11th
1st
Avenue
downtown,
for
example,
is
probably
a
collector
I'm
assuming
Kemp
for
that
matter,
those
those
streets
where
you
could
get
from
one
end
to
one
into
town
to
the
other.
With
you
know,
a
few
stops
here
and
there,
but
not
oh.
M
L
M
H
No
that's
a
good
question:
there
were
some
roadblocks
and
then
drawing
that
line
on
this
map,
one
being
the
current
housing
that's
in
place
is
the
primary
one
and
then
school
district
property
immediately
west
of
those
houses
is
another
potential
roadblock
to
run
a
street
through
that
segment
is
less
than
likely
than
doing
some
kind
of
alignment
than
what's
showing
on
here.
These.
These
are
this
future
route.
I
would
note,
is
an
idea,
that's
not
set
in
stone.
M
A
Know
if
it
looks
like
a
duck
and
quacks
like
a
duck,
it's
probably
a
duck
and
I
I
mean
weekend
when
we
plat
modify
a
little
bit
and
tweak
will
exact
the
exact
position.
But
the
the
main
thing
is
that
we
have
a
thir
through
route
that
we
keep
in
mind
as
we're
plotting,
and
it
gives
us
a
plan
to
build
upon
rather
than
just
let
development
happen
haphazardly
there
and
yes,.
W
K
Been
very
critical
to
city
since
I've
been
on
the
council
with
our
long-term
planning
and
this
all
the
obeah.
A
small
project
has
the
hint
of
some
long-term
planning
here
that
ran
it.
It
acts
like
a
collector
route
with
all
these
driveways
on
it,
at
least
in
the
parts
that
they're
going
to
expand
upon
we'll
limit
some
of
that
access
and
we'll
be
able
to
get
it
to
behave
more.
The
way
we
really
wanted
to
right.
AA
AA
Historically
in
the
city
of
Watertown,
we
have
adopted
that
major
collectors
or
minor
arterioles,
the
19th
streets,
the
3rd
avenues
of
the
world,
those
roads
that
are
on
section
lines.
They
usually
have
a
larger
right-of-way
accommodate
more
of
that
traffic.
That
we
would
see
our
general
policy
is
to
try
to
keep
minor
collectors
on
the
quarter
lines,
the
quarter
sections.
AA
So,
as
you
see
this
property,
this
road
going
somewhat
to
the
north
on
the
west
side,
it's
getting
us
closer
to
that
collector
line,
and
some
of
that
has
to
taking
into
account
some
some
geographical
areas
some
those
types
of
things
when
we
take
a
look
on
section.
20
excuse
me
right
here.
Well,
we
can
see
that
we
have
a
major
drainage
here.
AA
The
placement
of
a
collector
here
is
probably
not
going
to
happen
in
the
immediate
future,
and
so
we've
also
done
some
preliminary
planning
of
the
Auris
property
north
of
14th
Avenue.
So
those
were
some
of
the
things
that
the
Planning
Commission
looked
at
when
they
were
coming
forth
with
a
recommendation.
I
wasn't
there
as
far
as
the
decision
making
of
that
of
that
board,
but
I
know,
Liam
was
here.
AA
A
Thank
you
other
questions,
no
more
questions.
This
was
recommended
by
the
plant
by
Planck
mission
too,
so
that
helps
I'll.
Look
for
action.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
there's
opposed
signify
by
saying
aye
motion
carries
item
number.
Nine
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
19
0-3
to
amend
zoning
district
boundaries
for
the
West
portion
of
block
28
syndicate
addition
from
our
to
a
single-family
attached
residential
district
to
our
one,
see
compact
single-family
residential
district
subject
to
our
all
planning
requirements,
and
this
does
not
require
action.
A
So
I
won't
look
for
a
motion,
but
we'd
like
to
point
out
that
this
was
recommended
by
the
planned
Commission,
and
this
is
the
first
application
for
our
brand-new,
affordable
housing
zone.
The
r1
compact
so
kind
of
an
exciting
moment.
Are
there
any
questions
about
this
or
Heath?
Did
you
want
to
add
to
that?
I'm.
C
H
As
the
mayor
indicated,
the
intention
of
the
applicant
in
this
case
was
to
make
utilization
of
the
r1c
district
and
they
incorporated
the
former
school
property
which
is
privately
owned
now
I
believe
into
their
rezone
for
a
couple
different
reasons.
It
fit
the
current
school
building
fit
that
zone
well,
and
the
intention
is
to
build
up
the
Lots
north
of
that
school
building
are
better
accomplished
by
utilization
of
the
r1c
zoning
district
than
what
it's
currently
zoned.
H
A
K
AB
Thank
you.
So
when
we
created
this
district,
we
did
consider
all
of
that.
So
we
actually
have
restrictions
on
driveway
widths
to
make
sure
that
there's
20
feet
of
contiguous
curbing
to
still
accommodate
the
on
street
parking,
and
so,
if
they
it's
limited
to
12
feet,
unless
they
can
show
that
they
can
have
20
feet
of
the
contiguous
curbing
if
they,
if
they
have
more
space
and
they
can
have
a
wider
driveway,
but
just
to
ensure
that
they'll
have
that
20
feet.
So.
A
AB
A
L
AB
AB
H
L
H
AB
AB
L
AB
A
Any
other
questions,
thank
you
brandy,
all
right
item
ten.
This
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
19
0
4
to
amend
sections
21
point
to
602
and
21.2
802,
allowing
recreational
use
as
a
permitted
use
within
the
c2
local
commercial
district
and
C
through
C
3,
highway
commercial
district
subject
to
planning
requirement
all
planning
requirements
and
again
this
is
a
first
reading,
no
actions
required,
but
I'll.
Let
heath
elaborate
on
what
this
is.
I
think.
H
Currently,
recreational
use
is
only
allowed
as
a
conditional
use
in
the
C
1
zoning
district.
This
will
expand
that
use
unconditionally
to
the
C
2
and
C
3
commercial
districts
as
well.
This
was
a
split
vote.
The
Planning
Commission
I,
remember
the
exact
numbers
of
5
to
1
or
I
think
was
5
want,
remember,
8.
H
The
Brandis
got
this
definition
memorized
a
lot
better
than
I
do
and
she
can
maybe
ramble
off
a
few
more
examples,
but
things
of
that
nature,
recreationally
other
things
like
some
of
the
public
parks
and
recreational
uses
of
that
nature
can
fall
under
this
category
as
well,
but
some
of
the
other
private
uses
brandied.
You
have
a
list
that
you
could
share
well.
G
H
It's
correct
councilman
bill
our
that
the
primary
concern
was
that
the
current
C
2
or
C
3
zoning
districts
adjacent
to
the
lake
and
the
areas,
because
that
district
is
so
minimal
around
the
lake
wanting
it
to
be
preserved
for
certain
other
commercial
uses.
Other
than
what's
defined,
as
recreational
use.
AB
Just
as
far
as
the
looking
at
a
lake
district,
we've
talked
about
that
for
ever
since
I've
been
here
and
what
well
for
sure
ever
since
I've
been
here
and
longer,
and
so
we're
hoping
to
that,
the
lake
campus
capacitor
plan
will
shed
some
light
and
then
that
we
can
move
forward
with
I'm
developing
that
sort
of
zoning
district,
knowing
that
it's
necessary
and
that
it
is
different
than
our
districts
within
city
limits.
It
E
proper.
Z
H
That
option
was
discussed
at
length
at
the
Planning
Commission
as
well,
and,
of
course,
the
planning
Commissioner
could
chime
on
this
also.
But
the
discussion
led
towards
wanting
to
streamline
you
know
the
98%
of
these
districts,
to
where
we
think
it's
it's
an
approved,
approvable
use
without
conditional
or
exceptions,
is
where
the
discussion
really
led
to
is
not
wanting
to
bring
the
98%
forward
to
the
BOA
for
conditional
use
permit
because
of
the
2%.
That's
out
there
that
we
may
want
that
for
how.
AA
Todd
Keyes
Watertown
planning
Commissioner,
the
Planning
Commission
Board
of
Adjustment,
has
taken
the
general
approach
over
the
course
of
the
last
year
that
we
want
to
limit
the
number
of
Board
of
Adjustment
actions
that
are
consistently
approved
on
a
regular
basis.
Why
create
work
when
we
don't
need
to
create
work,
make
it
cumbersome
for
individuals
that
want
to
do
business
in
this
community?
So
that's
been
our
approach.
This
idea,
here
of
having
three
or
four
c2
areas
currently
zoned
around
the
lake
inside
of
a
year.
AA
There
won't
be
any
c2
areas,
is
honor
on
the
lake
because
we
will
be
developing
and
proposing
a
new
lake
district
that
will
allow
and
then
take
these
things
into
consideration.
So
I
don't
want
you
all
to
hang
up
get
hung
up
on
three
properties.
When
we
really
tried
to
streamline
an
entire
process,
that's
going
to
move
the
community
forward.
Those.
AB
I
would
just
add
that
I
pulled
this
up
here
of
like
what
the
permitted
uses
are
currently
in
the
c2
district.
So
you
know
right
now
we'll
allow
an
automobile
parking
lot:
a
bank
neighborhood
retail
establishment,
service,
establishment,
public
utilities,
an
office
and
then
the
c3,
it's
you
know
those
things
and
then
at
a
few
additional
things,
but
to
to
think
about.
If
that,
if
those
are
more
obtrusive
uses,
then
a
recreational
use
is
kind
of
where
we
tried
to
relate
that
in.
A
I
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor
I'll,
just
touch
on
a
couple
of
the
high
points
and
then
I
know.
Councilman
velour
has
been
intimately
involved
in
this
matter,
so
I'll,
let
him
chime
in
as
he
deems
appropriate.
So
this
is
basically.
This
is
the
last
of
the
sponsorship
agreements
that
Ryan
query
was
working
on
and
it
carried
over
until
now.
This
agreement
would
be
a
10
year
term,
$15,500
provided
to
the
city
per
year
and
in
exchange
active
heating,
we'll
have
signage
in
the
above.
I
The
concession
area
in
the
park
and
rec
gym
the
park
and
rec
gym
will
essentially
be
renamed.
The
active
heating
sports
zone
at
Prairie
lakes,
Wellness,
Center
and
they'll,
be
signage
to
that
effect
as
well,
and
they'll
also
be
signage
on
each
of
the
four
scoreboards
in
the
gym
and
if
you're
interested
in
seeing
the
mock-ups
of
that
signage,
it's
on
the
council
agenda.
It's
in
the
council
agenda,
yeah.
G
Not
a
whole
lot
more
to
add
to
that
what
you
said:
Matt
I
gave
you
Brian
query
credit
for
this.
He
really
went
went
to
bat
for
active
heating
on
this.
Even
beyond
the
term
of
his
contract,
which
ended
last
fall
and
the
last
last
month,
or
so
was
kind
of
turned
over
to
me-
has
gotten
Prairie
lakes.
Approval
number
of
us
on
the
council
have
also
waited
on
this.
A
D
A
A
AC
Evening,
thank
you.
So
this
is
agreement
for
the
the
whirlwind
effect
we
went
through
last
year
for
the
supplemental
funding.
We
are
still
trying
for
that.
We
have
not
heard
a
determination
on
the
second
round
yet,
hopefully
in
a
couple
of
weeks
here
we
hear
if
we
got
funding
for
the
terminal
or
not.
If
we
do
not
have
funding,
we
will
apply
next
year
again
with
the
FAA
reauthorization
bill.
There's
a
1
billion
dollar
supplemental
program,
the
next
four
years.
AC
AC
Actual
this
is
the
concept
budget
report.
So
this
the
four
options
that
we
came
up
with
our
meat
hunt
came
up
with
the
location.
The
dollar
amount
the
square
footage
that
we
need
in
them
peak
time
hours
when
we
actually
have
flights
on
the
ground.
That's
what
this
study
did
was
tell
us
how
big
the
building
needed
to
be
how
many
square
feet
we
had
to
have
for
the
the
flights
we
have
currently.
D
A
Z
A
A
A
V
V
V
I
mean
I,
don't
know
Koho,
but
tell
me
about
the
development
company
that
really
thinks
that
business
is
done
like
that
I
think
somebody's
pulling
some
wool
over
somebody's
eyes,
not
to
suggest
that
you
know
that
you
shouldn't
be
able
to
trust
the
word
of
a
mayor,
but
by
the
same
token,
he
presumably
was
not
authorized
to
make
that
I
find
it
kind
of
hard
to
believe
that
these
people
operate
without
legal
counsel,
and
it
also
is
incredible
to
me
to
imagine
that
anybody's
attorney
would
have
told
them.
That's
fine
just
rely
on
it.
V
We
don't
need
to
get
an
amendment
to
the
contract
so
before
we
rush
to
what
did
you
say,
300,000
to
you
know,
to
give
up
$300,000
of
taxpayers
money
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about.
You
know
why,
in
the
world
these
you
folks
think
that
this
company
was
reasonably
entitled
to
rely
on
that
it
should,
in
my
opinion,
have
been
clearly
something
you
would
not
rely
on.
AA
I'm
in
the
same
boat
as
a
planning,
Commissioner
and
also
as
a
citizen
of
the
city
of
Watertown
trying
to
understand,
is
this
something
that's
been
discussed
and
decided
an
executive
session
and
coming
out
doing
this,
there's
just
something
that's
been.
How
did
we
get
to
this
point?
That's
something
I'm,
just
curious
about.
AA
Remember
that
when
this
whole
situation
with
coho
development
started
years
and
years
ago,
prior
to
this
issue,
there
was
agreements
in
place
at
coho
was
going
to
be
paying
for
a
significant
portion
of
the
first
debt
of
the
Willow
Creek
Drive,
and
then
that
was
forgiven
by
the
city.
So
the
city
has
already
granted
several
chunks
of
change
back
to
a
private
developer
and
and
in
that
same
part
of
time
we
haven't
seen
a
real
significant
amount
of
development
happen
on
the
coho
property
since
then.
So
why
are
we
incentivizing
development?
That's
not
occurring!
K
I'll
just
make
a
cop
I,
don't
just
disagree
with
what
I
just
heard,
I
and
others
on
this
council
had
complained
in
the
past
about
documenting
things
after
the
fact
and
I.
Think
if
you
go
back
and
you
watch
some
some
of
the
past
council
news,
you'll
hear
some
of
those
comments
and
I
think
that
that
practice
has
certainly
decreased
in
the
last
couple
of
years.
So
I
would
just
say
I'm
not
happy
with
how
this
rolled
out,
but
under
the
circumstances,
there
were
some
discussions
that
were
made
and
some
commitments
that
were
made.
K
V
Don
Nancy
turbek
berry.
It
also
usurped
the
power
of
the
people.
I
mean
that's
really
why
this
stinks,
and
this
bit
this
kind
of
business
of
somebody
getting
too
big
for
his
britches
and
making
promises
that
he
had
no
authority
to
make
is
not
something
that
the
taxpayers
of
Watertown
should
pay
for.
V
You
know
obviously,
I
haven't
you
know.
I
haven't
been
involved
in
the
legality
of
this
at
all,
but
I'd
have
done
litigation
for
well
over
thirty
years
and,
as
I
said,
I
think
most
attorneys
would
know
that
it's
pretty
hard
to
modify
a
written
agreement,
an
especially
one
that
involves
real
estate
by
an
oral
occurrence.
So
it
seems
to
me,
like
maybe
the
council
should
should
say
to
this
company,
we're
so
sorry
that
you
were
that.
You
apparently
believed
something
that
you
should
not
have
believed.
V
U
Know,
I
think
that
what
has
happened
is
that
when
we
talked
as
a
council,
we
did
talk
about
the
importance
of
getting
businesses
in
here
and
we
talked
about.
There
are
some
things
we
can
do
and
we
did
talk
about
that
and
I
think
mayor
Thorson
did
have
the
idea
that
he
was
going
to
go
out
and
try
to
work
a
deal.
I
think
what
didn't
happen
is
he
didn't
come
back
and
really
inform
us
as
to
what
it
was.
So
we
could
have
the
final
say
on
it,
and
so.
V
M
V
Right
then
John,
you
also
should
have
known
better
I
mean
the
people
of
Watertown
deserve
to
have
their
business
done
in
the
open
and
according
to
law,
not
according
to
winks
and
shaking
hands,
and
understandings
and
I
don't
care
if
it
was
mayor,
Thornton
alone
or
mayor
Thorson
and
two
or
three
council
members.
That
is
not
the
way
our
government
should
work
and
and
I
believe
that
the
council
of
all
people
should
know
that
your
powers
shouldn't.
We
assert
that
you
serve
that
way.
X
X
AA
I
AA
A
X
X
V
C
V
All
right,
then,
was
it
by
did
the
majority
of
the
council
members
in
executive
session
agree
to
this
I
mean
if
this
is
where
the,
where
the
authority
goes
back
to
I,
guess
I
just
like
to
know.
Was
it
a
couple
of
people
that
thought
it
or
the
majority
of
the
council?
If
that's
where,
supposedly
the
the
legally
binding
action
took
place,
no,
there
must
be.
I
X
We
could
take
the
stance
that
you
suggested
to
simply
say,
tough
luck,
but
that's
probably
the
right
way
to
do
if
you're
gonna,
just
purely
look
at
it
from
a
legal
standpoint
but
I
sure
as
hell
wouldn't
want
to
be
a
developer
and
look
anybody
in
the
face
and
take
their
word
for
anything
at
all.
If
that's
what's
gonna
happen,
knowing
that
it's
a
technicality
as
to
why
the
ball
got
dropped
well,.
R
V
M
Have
to
also
realize
oh
and
Todd
knows
that
too,
when
you
get
into
economic
development
discussions,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
have
to
go
on
behind
the
scenes
before
you
actually
there's
negotiating
and
stuff
like
that.
That
is
pretty
common.
Todd
knows
that
just
as
well,
and
you
should
too
sure.
V
H
Matter
mayor
for
me:
yes,
just
as
one
of
the
administrators
of
these
agreements,
along
with
my
colleagues
to
my
left
here,
I
think
that
I
would
just
like
to
come
in
the
council
for
the
action
moving
forward
in
a
direction
that
does
solidify
these
measures.
I
think
that
and
moving
forward
I
can
speak
for
myself
and
I.
H
Think
my
colleagues
to
my
left
that
knowing
the
importance
of
these
amendments
and
the
impact
on
them
and
how
critical
it
is
to
get
them
in
writing
and
modified
is
definitely
something
that
will
be
on
our
radar
to
bring
forth
to
this
council
at
any
time.
We
were
brought
aware
of
any
such
amendments
that
are
being
proposed
to
us
by
the
developers.
H
I
just
wanted
to
state
that
for
the
record
and
also
come
in
to
Council
for
taking
a
step
and
wrapping
up
these
loose
strings
that
have
hung
out
for
so
long
on.
This
particular
development
I
do
think
right,
wrong
or
otherwise,
with
the
antique
agreements
or
verbal
discussions
that
were
had.
This
is
the
right
way
to
solidify
it
by
taking
formal
action
by
way
of
amending
it.
If
that's
the
council's
choosing
to
honor
what
was
verbally
committed
two
years
ago,
I.
A
So
there's
no
mistaking
that
in
the
future
to
any
obligation
of
taxpayer
funds
which
I
offer
in
any
of
these
deals
going
forward
as
I
am
involved
in
those
kinds
of
deals,
I
will
tell
the
people
with
whom
I'm
dealing
that
it's
not
a
deal
till
the
council
has
acted
upon
it
in
a
public
meeting
such
as
this
three,
the
City
Council
members
must
strive
to
see
that
all
dealings
by
the
city
are
done
in
a
manner
that
protects
and
favors
public
welfare.
If
that
also
favors
private
welfare
good.
A
A
Don't
sit
back
and
wait
for
it
and
finally,
five
I
will
support
any
proposed
changes
to
our
ordinances
that
the
council
believes
are
necessary
to
clarify
the
responsibilities
of
the
mayor,
the
City
Council
and
the
staff,
because
it
seems
to
me,
we've
had
a
lot
of
confusion
in
years
past
and
as
a
former
staff
member
of
the
city
of
Watertown
I
was
deeply
frustrated
and
disturbed
by
that
confusion.
If
there's
confusion,
let's
iron
it
out
from
this
point
going
forward,
I
will
support
any
change.
A
You
think
is
needed
for
us
to
be
able
to
go
forward
with
confidence
so
with
that
I
understand
that
this
isn't
comfortable
for
anybody,
but
this
had
to
happen.
This
had
to
happen
because,
right
now,
development
cannot
occur.
We're
done
until
this
is
resolved
in
that
particular
neighborhood,
because
this
there
is
an
agreement
signed
and
recorded
at
the
courthouse
that
says
no
building
permits
until
these
payments
are
made
and
the
landowner
feels
he
shouldn't
have
to
make
those
payments
because
he
was
told
by
the
mayor
he
didn't
have
to
so.
X
It's
no
different
than
the
discussions
that
this
body
has
had
with
trying
to
retain
Terrax
in
this
community.
It's
no
different.
There
are
discussions
that
take
place
that
are
done
in
executive
session
that
are
part
of
negotiations,
and
that
is
not
a
matter.
If
that's
the
case,
then
that's
not
transparent.
No.
A
X
X
X
X
A
U
Z
A
A
Z
No
I
would
like
to
make
it
count.
Talisman
Bueller,
you
know
with
this.
You
said
there
are
several
other
issues.
I'd
like
I'd
like
for
you
to
point
some
of
those
out
I
can
tell
you.
I
worked
with
all
these
folks
for
a
long
time.
There's
there
was
never
the
spirit
in
the
intent
of
making
shady
deals
on
the
outside.
We
we
tried
to
work
something
out
that
we
felt
was
the
right
thing
to
do
and
I
don't
know
how
much
I
should
be
talking
about
executive
session.
Z
That's
probably
why
I
didn't
chime
in
earlier,
but
we
did
make
this
council,
with
exception
of
a
couple
of
us,
made
the
agreement
that
we
would
go
up
to
a
certain
amount
to
help
that
industrial
action
at
that
industrial
development
action.
There
was
nobody
here
and
there's
never
been
anybody
here
that
we're
trying
to
do
shady
deals
and
that's
what
we're
painting
a
picture
of
here.
That's
ridiculous.
This
is
there's
an
honorable
bunch
of
people
that
worked
on
this
project.
What
what
benefit
is
us
we're
trying
to
develop
the
community?
Z
These
are
things
that
we
did
to
help
foster
that
growth.
It
was
nothing
shady
and
I
will
say:
okay,
it
did
go
to
Steve,
okay,
we
said
Steve,
you
have
the
latitude
to
look
at
this,
make
some
suggestions
and
I
will
say
that
that
was
a
transition
at
that
time
with
Stanton
Fox
and
as
we
know
there
were
some
issues
at
that
time.
So.
C
Z
A
I'm
not
saying
that
the
council
has
been
aware
of
these
things.
I
these
things
have
occurred
at
the
staff
level,
with
a
different
executive
in
this
chair
and
I
can
tell
you
one
of
the
other
things
that
we've
passed
recently
was
a
development
we're
having
to
do
with
drainage
things
that
weren't
done
and
we
met,
and
we
resolved
that
in
this
room
a
few
months
ago
and
prior
to
that,
we
spent
hours
and
hours
in
mediation
before
bringing
an
agreement
forward
in
a
public
setting
and
voting
on
it
and
passing
it.
A
X
A
X
X
A
Right
I
agree,
but
I
think
here
what
I'm
saying
is
when
Hobby
Lobby
came,
there
was
an
announcement
made
and
the
town
was
thrilled
that
Hobby
Lobby
was
coming.
There
were
probably
other
property
owners
who
had
wished.
Hobby
Lobby
had
gone
on
their
land,
but
the
town
was
happy
and
the
council
knew
there
was
something
in
the
works
that
made
that
happen.
Were
you
expecting
their
development
agreement
that
you
approved
had
just
been
signed
with
less
than
a
year
had
passed
with
an
obligation.
I,
don't
know
if
you
even
knew.
A
That
was
how
the
$300,000
grant
I'm
not
blaming
you
for
that,
but
how?
How
does
it
we
have
to
work
together?
It
isn't
just
the
mayor,
it
isn't
just
the
council,
it
isn't
just
the
staff.
We
as
a
community
should
be
looking
out
for
the
public
number
one
public
welfare,
that's
what
we
do
and
we
all
have
a
part
in
it
to
work
together
to
see
that
it's
done
appropriately.
Everybody
has
a
piece
in
that.
It's
not
all
any
one
person's
fault
and
the
the
deals
that
went
down.
A
K
We
should
lower
the
temperature
a
little
bit,
everybody
here's,
what
I
will
say
the
proper
procedures
weren't
followed,
I,
don't
think
anybody
up
here
did
anything
ill
intention.
I
I
agree
with
those
comments.
Nobody
had
that,
but
the
reason
why
there's
a
kick
in
my
stomach
because
it
happened
on
my
watch
now
certain
things
you
don't
know
things
you
should
know
certain
things
you
can't
find
out.
K
You
know,
III,
don't
think
that
the
city
got
anything
of
a
raw
deal
per
se,
but
the
proper
procedures
weren't
followed
and
anytime.
That
happens.
It
casts
shadows
on
this
body.
That
is
the
issue
we
have
just
got
to
make
a
commitment.
We
follow
the
proper
procedures,
I'm
not
placing
blame
anywhere
in
this
statement,
but
if
we
don't
follow
them,
this
is
what
happens
so
I
I
know
we're
all
committed
to
doing
that.
K
A
You
and
and
I
do
stick
up
for
the
council.
I
I
admire
you
for
doing
the
job
that
you
do
and
as
well
as
the
staff
and
the
staff
members
who
are
here
know
that
I
am
completely
dedicated
to
doing
the
right
thing
for
the
public
and
I
tell
them
that
all
the
time.
If
you're
not
sure
what
to
do,
you
know
ask
some
questions.
A
Do
the
right
thing
and
if
there's
ever
a
question
about
it,
you
know
your
gut
will
probably
tell
you,
but
if
it
doesn't
reach
out
and
talk
to
people,
because
that
has
not
been
necessarily
the
case
in
the
past,
but
moving
forward
it
is.
We
have
to
work
together.
The
City
Council,
the
staff
and
the
mayor
must
work
together
to
serve
the
public,
because
that's
why
we're
here
to
serve
the
public
and
I
know
he
want
to
do
that.
A
D
A
A
A
Item
number
14
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
an
agreement
with
McGrath
for
the
comprehensive
compensation
and
classification
study
and
authorization
for
the
finance
office
to
issue
special
checks,
as
required
by
the
contract.
So
look
for
a
motion,
second
for
approval,
move
by
Manties
second
by
l'olam
Kristin.
Would
you
please
explain
this
for
us.
B
Thank
you.
As
you
all
remember,
at
the
last
council,
we
brought
before
you
the
results
of
the
RFP
for
the
wage
study
that
we
wanted
to
do.
We
had
it
narrowed
down
to
the
two
different
companies
and
we
were
given
the
direction
to
proceed
with
McGrath,
so
we
requested
them
to
give
us.
The
agreement.
Matt
has
reviewed
that
agreement
and
before
you
is
the
agreement
to
sign
with
McGrath,
to
do
not
only
the
classification
compensation,
but
also
to
do
the
job,
description
and
organizational
structure
review.
B
B
Haven't
once
we
get
to
this
point
once
the
agreement
signed-
and
we
start
I'm
it'll
start
pretty
soon,
because
it
was
actually
about
a
month
behind
all
right,
so
I
know
they're
they're
prepared
I
did
ask
the
question.
I
know
the
last
time
the
question
was
posed
about
it.
Do
they
do
on-site
and
they're
within
this
price?
L
B
Haven't
given
a
specific
number
but
I
know
they
meet
not
only
with
the
department
heads
but
also
with
a
few
supervisors
and
then
other
staff,
so
they
kind
of
try
to
to
get
everybody's
perspective,
so
I
mean
they
won't
sit
down
and
meet
with
all
200
of
our
employees,
but
no,
they
do
meet
with
the
different
levels
throughout
the
different
departments.
Okay,
thank
you.
Other.
H
B
The
goal
we
hope
to
kind
of
have
some
of
the
the
way
to
study
the
actual
salaries
done
during
the
budget
process.
I
can't
say
if
it'll
be
kind
of
more
at
the
end,
but
I
know
the
mayor
Knights,
who
have
discussed
kind
of
putting
in
a
little
bit
of
a
wiggle
room
that
we
kind
of
anticipate
having
into
the
budget.
But,
yes,
the
wages
will
probably
come
first
and
then
more
of
the
job,
description
and
organizational
structure
following.
U
B
Have
a
good
hint
I
mean
the
good
thing
about
this.
Is
we
already
have
job
descriptions
for
all
of
ours?
We
are
at
this
point
are
sending
those
out
Chris
and
I
are
getting
those
out
to
the
departments.
We
want
all
the
departments
to
review
their
current
job
descriptions.
Look
at
them
for
things
that
they're
missing
things
that
they
add
things
that
aren't
relevant
anymore,
so
that
when
it
comes
time
to
sit
down,
they
can
provide
that
Timah
graph
and
kind
of
get
it
started.
B
So
I
mean
a
lot
of
it
is
HR
and
Finance,
but
a
lot
of
it
is
too
for
the
department's
to
come
forward
and
you
know
kind
of
tell
what
their
departments
do
and
where
they
see
some
of
their
job
descriptions
needing
some
clarification.
So
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
city
project.
It's
not
just
a
finance
HR
project
everybody's
going
to
be
involved
and
that's
the
hope
is
that
we
get
McGrath
to
really
look
at
the
city
of
Watertown.
A
Thanks
other
questions
or
comments,
I'll
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
aye
motion
carries
item.
15
is
authorization
to
prepay
a
portion
of
the
2020
annual
dues
in
the
amount
of
seven
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
to
first
District
Association
of
local
governments
in
2019,
in
order
to
facilitate
completion
of
Watertown
area
transit,
coordinated
plan,
and
this
did
receive
recommendation
from
the
committee
meeting
prior.
But
we
have
folks
here
to
give
much
better
detail
than
I
was
able
to
so
I'll.
AA
Our
office,
the
first
planning
district,
was
asked
to
submit
a
bid
on
that
planning
process.
We
did
submit
a
bid
for
$36,000,
of
which
80%
would
be
paid
for
by
a
South
Dakota
Department
of
Transportation
that
out
Stein
outstanding
balance
of
about
seventy
two
hundred
dollars
was
be
in
the
form
of
a
hard
cash
match
and
I
believe
in
our
proposal.
We
had
made
the
the
pitch
that,
in
the
event
we
were
selected
and
we
were
able
to
use
existing
dues
that
are
paid
by
the
city
as
the
hard
cash
match.
AA
That
would
help
the
project
moving
forward.
I
think
we
were
very
competitive
and
I
think
that
was
probably
the
tipping
point
in
comparison
as
a
couple
of
the
other
request
for
Proposal
submittals,
so
where
we're
at
in
the
whole
process
is
in
the
in
order
for
the
first
district
to
do
this
work
on
behalf
of
the
Watertown
area
transit,
we
need
to
come
up
with
seventy
two
hundred
dollars
hard
cash
match.
AA
Now,
every
year
for
the
26
years
that
I've
been
associated
with
the
first
planning
district,
the
city
of
Watertown
has
belonged
to
our
organization
and
we
collect
annual
dues
from
the
city
of
Watertown
and
the
other
76
communities
and
11
counties
across
the
district.
We
use
those
dues
as
an
income
stream,
sometimes
just
to
keep
the
lights
on,
sometimes
to
leverage
it
against
other
state
and
federal
grant
opportunities,
and-
and
so
it's
never
earmarked
monies
generally,
but
every
once
in
a
while.
AA
You
have
an
opportunity
such
as
this,
where
we
can
obtain
a
large
chunk
of
state
or
federal
dollars
to
come
in
to
help
do
a
project,
that's
necessary
for
something
that's
important
to
the
community,
such
as
Watertown
transit,
and
so
what
we
are
making
the
request
today
is
that
next
year
you
have
the
city
watch
on
would
have
dues
of
the
over
ten
thousand
dollars
to
be
paid
to
the
district.
I
would
line-item
seventy
two
hundred
dollars
of
those
dues
and
apply
them
towards
this
project
to
be
used
of
the
cash
man.
AA
A
To
say,
Watertown
area
transit
provides
such
an
important
service
to
our
community
and
thank
you
for
sitting
on
that
board
and
it's
you
know
we
can't
do
without
them,
and
this
is
a
very
small
thing
for
us
to
do
to
that
good
part
of
our
community
and
there's
there's
really
no
loss
to
us
at
all.
This
is
a
win
situation
for
everybody.
Definitely.
AD
Well,
first
off
Randy,
Tupper
I'm
president
as
a
board
of
Watertown
area
transit,
and
thank
you
guys
for
letting
us
come
up
tonight.
I've
been
on
her
board
for
I.
Think
about
17
18
years,
I've
seen
a
lot
of
changes
over
the
years.
You
know.
One
of
these
plans
like
this
is
what
helps
us
be
efficient
in
our
changes.
You
know
some
of
the
things
that
that
we've
really
seen
grow
from
our
last
coordination
plan
is
his
medical
trips.
Medicaid
trips,
you
know,
we've
we've
identified
Saturday
services
in
need.
AD
It
helps
us
go
out
into
the
community
and
find
out
where
the
need
is.
The
only
difference
is
this
time,
as
Todd's
gonna
do
most
of
our
work
for
us.
I
think
we
spent
about
nine
months
doing
it
last
time,
and-
and
we
just
feel
that
with
his
expertise
and
a
lot
of
this
one
of
our
fastest-growing
parts
of
the
transit
is,
is
employment.
You
know,
so
we
hear
every
day
about
economic
development
workforce
in
things
like
that,
you'd
be
surprised
and
the
percentage
of
employment
rights
we
give
every
day
and
it
grows
every
day.
U
U
Y
AD
Of
the
things
out
of
our
last
coordination
plan,
when
you
see
prairie
lakes,
hospital
I
mean
I
got
to
give
my
hats
off
to
them,
because
they've
they've
come
on
board
with
the
transit
they
supply
transportation
to
any
medical
trip
they
pay
for
it,
I
don't
care.
If
it's
a
dentist
appointment,
I
appointment
going
to
the
chiropractor,
you
don't
have
to
go
to
prairie
like
hospital,
you
can
go
to
either
clinic.
AD
AA
AD
Another
thing
we
won't
be
coming
to
you
guys
for
money
for
buses
this
year
because
we
did
have
the
county
was
good
enough
to
give
us
some
money
and
also
we've
had
some
donations
from
private
individuals
that
that
are
really
seen
and
we've
helped
them
through
the
years
with
the
transit
that
really
stepped
up
the
plate.
So
you
guys.
C
A
D
A
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carried
Hey
item
number
18.
Thank
you
guys.
Item
number
18
is
addition
of
airport
worker
position
to
the
budget
and
I'll
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval
and
then
we'll
discuss
moved
by
man
T
second
by
long
and
IC
airport
manager.
Todd
Cyrus
here
want
to
tell
us
about
it.
Sure.
AC
A
AC
Should
be
a
hundred
percent
if
our
numbers
stay
the
same
as
we
are,
the
PFC
is
obviously
a
variable
number.
It's
a
three
dollars
and
eighty
cents
comes
back
to
the
city
into
the
airport
fund,
specifically
okay.
So
if
that
number,
if
that
number
goes
down,
obviously
yeah,
it's
gonna
cost
us
money,
but.
AC
So
this
would
bring
us
up
to
a
minimal
coverage
is
essentially
what
this
is.
This
is
the
bare
minimum
to
run
the
airport
with
the
hours
that
we
need
for
the
shifts
schedules.
The
I'm,
sorry
flight
schedules
that
we
have
for
our
this
would
give
us
4:30
in
the
morning
to
3:30
in
the
afternoon,
Sunday
Monday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday
and
then
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Friday,
Saturday
same
shift
day
shift,
and
we
would
have
a
two
to
one
in
the
morning
afternoon
shift
the
same
days.
AC
A
For
the
benefit
of
the
public
understanding,
we
have
flights
that
will
be
leaving
earlier
than
we
were
experiencing
before
and
we
have
to
have
staff
there
earlier
than
we
had
to
in
the
past,
and
that
means
you're
arriving
at
Denver
earlier
to
make
your
connections
more
flights
are
available
to
you
and
then
coming
back.
The
flights
are
leaving
Denver
later
arriving
in
Watertown
later,
which
means
also
more
connections
available
to
you,
but
it
also
means
more
staff
time
at
the
airport.
A
AC
It
won't
be
easy.
Nobody
likes
to
work
two
to
one
one
of
the
things,
one
of
the
things
that
we've
kicked
around
interdepartmental
II
with
meetings
with
my
staff
was
what
would
entice
somebody
to
work
that
shift
and
shift
differential
definitely
came
up
every
other.
It
seems
like
business
in
town
offers
a
very
decent
shift
differential
to
do
that.
So
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
was
kicked
around.
Are
we
offering
now?
We
are
not
at
the
moment.
L
B
I,
do
want
just
a
point
of
clarification
that
the
motion
should
be
that
it's
a
grade,
four
Airport
maintenance
worker.
Just
so
that's
on
the
record
as
far
as
the
cost,
the
total,
what
we
would
put
into
the
budget-
and
this
would
be
for
a
whole
year,
but
so
it's
a
little
different
with
it
starting
later,
but
that
position
would
be
around
fifty
nine
thousand
dollars
and
that
is
with
salary
all
the
benefits,
retirement
health
insurance
and
we
always
would
budget
that
a
person
would
take
a
family
health
insurance.
B
So
just
so,
you
kind
of
have
a
little
bit
of
an
idea.
That
is
what
the
position
would
be.
So
no
it
would.
What
you
would
essentially
be
doing
is
instead
of
waiting
for
the
budget
process.
When
we
normally
establish
new
positions,
you
would
be
allowing
the
airport
to
have
one
more
position
available
in
that
department.
A
AC
F
AC
L
K
H
We
of
course,
would
do
that,
if
necessary,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
brief
update
on
where
things
are
at
right.
Now
it
looks
like
we'll
be
okay,
and
after
this
event,
when
this
melt
goes
through,
we
will
again
monitor
the
situation
and
see,
if
we're
kinda
in
the
clear
so
to
speak
before
we
start
removal
of
the
temporary
cusco
baskets
that
are
strong
along
the
riverbanks
there.
So,
okay.
A
Around
the
previous
peak,
which
was
seventeen
twenty
two
point
five
ish
this
weekend
and
that
their
refining
that
and
they'll
give
us
the
word-
hopefully
tomorrow
on
that
and
that's
kind
of
somewhat
troublesome,
there
were
some
homes
with
water
in
them
at
the
link.
So
we'll
get
the
word
out
if
we
get
any
different
information
tomorrow.
A
A
D
With
our
recent
transgressions
against
executive
session
I'd
like
to
assume
that
we
can
probably
talk
about
problems
going
on
right
now
with
Burton
501
Steve's
will
probably
bring
it
up
with
a
couple
council
members
to
bring
it
forward
in
the
next
council
meeting.
So
if
it's
okay
to
talk
about
executive
session
in
public
now,
I.
A
G
Just
like
to
give
kudos
utility
apartment
in
the
light
of
storm
last
week
and
in
you
heard
any
number
of
power
outages
around
the
area
dealing
because
the
storm
and
I'm
not
aware
of
anything
net
that
we
experienced
here
in
Watertown.
So
they
get
to
hats
off
to
our
our
Utilities
Department.
Here
in
Watertown,
yep.