►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 03-05-2020
Description
Plan Commission
A
A
A
B
C
A
B
You
Blake,
so
this
is
the
zoning
text
amendment
to
title
21
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
creating
chapter
21,
29,
CL,
Lake,
commercial
district
and
amending
chapter
20,
105,
establishment
of
districts,
chapter
21,
10,
the
summary
of
district
regulations
and
chapter
21,
90
definitions.
So
the
main
the
main
action
that
we're
looking
at
is
that
we
are
creating
the
lake
commercial
district
or
the
main
agenda
item
that
you
guys
will
be
taking
action
on.
B
We've
been
working
on
this
since
December
and
I've
been
bringing
it
to
you
as
old
business
and
taking
it
kind
of
step
by
step.
So
we
have
had
public
discussion
so
and
because
we
wanted
the
public's
input
as
well
as
well
as
the
plan
Commission's,
and
so
when
we
first
started
the
draft
on
this,
we
did
us.
We
had
a
subcommittee
and
that
consisted
of
Todd,
myself,
Blake
and
Diana
Ford,
and
so
we
had
probably
three
meetings
and
just
whatever
we
had
presented
to
you
at
the
plan.
B
So
you'll
see
this
will
be
chapter
21,
29
added
to
title
21
and
the
purpose
of
the
late
commercial
district
is
to
establish
appropriate
locations
within
the
CL.
Lay
commercial
commercial
boundary
map
in
section
21,
2906
and
2120
907
too
late,
comp,
Eska
and
Lake
Pelican
that
are
conducive
to
late
commercial
activity
too,
and
then
also
to
permit
development
of
service
and
retail
centers
complimentary
to
Lake,
Recreation
and
living
adjacent
to
Lake,
Camp,
Eska
and
Lake
Pelican,
as
shown
in
the
comprehensive
Land
Use
Plan.
B
Here
you'll
see
the
permitted
uses
are
a
retail
establishment,
service,
establishment,
restaurants,
recreational
use,
campground
storage,
shops,
apartments
and
recreation
facility,
and
then
for
conditional
uses.
We
have
included
car
wash
automatic
or
semi-automatic
motels
and
hotels,
automobile
parking,
lot,
storage
units
and
office
building
and
then
also
a
bar
or
tavern
or
a
transit
station.
B
So
and
then
for
the
area
in
bulk
requirements
that
refers
you
to
chapter
21
10,
which
is
what
we're
also
amending
to
add
in
the
district
requirements
which
we
kept
consistent,
basically
with
the
the
c2
neighborhood
commercial
district
and
which
allows
for
well,
you
can
see
on
the
on
the
chart,
but
I'll
explain
what
we
did
for
the
the
CL
district
and
to
the
last
meeting.
We
talked
about
the
variations
and
how
to
deal
with
that.
So
you'll
see
that
there
it's
in
it
has
two
two
rows
on
this
table.
B
So
the
minimum
lot
area
would
be
ten
thousand
square
feet
and
then
a
hundred
foot
four
lot
width
and
then
we
kept
everything
consistent
for
the
setbacks.
So
the
front
yard,
rear
yard
side
yard
are
all
30
feet
and
then
that
if
it
were,
if
the
lot
were
a
hundred
feet,
the
maximum
mean
height
would
be
35
feet
and
then
for
the
second
row
there
you'll
see
everything
is
the
same,
except
for
the
lot
width
is
150
feet
and
then,
if
you
have
150
feet
of
frontage,
then
you
could
have
60
feet
in
height.
B
E
B
B
It
would
be
for
the
height,
so
the
one
the
one
row
allows.
So
at
our
last
discussion
we
had
the
issue
of
how
are
we
going
to
deal
with
the
height
and
everything
else
in
a
commercial
district
does
allow
for
60
feet
and
so
I
felt
that
we
shouldn't
take
that
away
necessarily
from
the
CL
district,
because
it
is
commercial,
but
also
to
protect
neighboring
properties
if
they
are
residential,
because
the
lake
is
built
out
with
residential
properties
for
the
most
part
that
we
were
protecting
there.
So.
A
D
F
We
are
we
stuck
at
100
and
150
feet.
I
mean
if
it's
150
feet
before
we
get
to
go
to.
60
want
to
be
easier
and
less
confusing,
just
to
have
a
single
row:
CL
districts,
and
then
we
just
have
some
sort
of
a
star
by
the
35
feet:
referencing
yeah
a
bullet
underneath
a
four
blows
lost
with
excess
of
150
feet
of
frontage.
They
may
be
put
60
feet
as
opposed
to
having
two
two
rows,
because.
A
B
B
F
G
H
D
B
F
Take
in
one
right,
whatever
we're
writing
policy
of
any
sort,
it
needs
to
be
written
for
the
person
who
doesn't
speak
the
language
because
I'm
as
a
builder
as
a
developer,
as
somebody
who
wants
to
do
something
I
know,
I'm
gonna
go
out
to
the
zoning
ordinance
and
do
my
due
diligence
ahead
of
time
before
I
come
in,
or
at
least
I
should
at
least
want
to
educate
myself,
and
if
the
ten
of
us
are
11
of
us,
that
city
are
having
our
struggling
with
this.
The
general
public
is
gonna
struggle
with
it.
A
B
The
30
30
foot
set
front
yard
setback
and
then
10-foot
from
the
side
and
10-foot
from
the
rear,
which
that
could
I
changed
that,
but
now
that
I
just
said
that
out
loud,
we
kept
the
consistency
between
the
front
and
the
rear
at
30
because
of
the
lake
and
how
the
front
yards
are
backwards
from
what
they
are
in
city
proper.
So
I,
don't
know
how
you
guys
feel
about
that.
Should
we,
because
if
you
were
putting
a
shed,
I
mean
it's
just
it's.
B
If
you
have,
if
you
were
redeveloping
a
property
or
just
developing
a
property
that
was
adjacent
to
the
lake
or
on
that
had
lake
frontage,
then
you
would
have
I
guess
that
could
be
fine,
because
the
property
line
comes
from
the
ordinary
high
water
mark.
Sorry,
I'm
kind
of
thinking
out
loud,
but
I
think
that
we
almost
should
change
that
instead
of
having
it
say,
ten
change
it
to
30.
B
F
B
B
So
we
said
that
impervious
area
shall
not
exceed
50%
of
the
total
lot
area
and
then
all
exterior
walls
facing
and
immediately
adjacent
to
a
property,
zoned,
r1,
single-family
residential
shall
be
finished
with
the
following
materials
or
similar
fo
materials
or
a
combination
of,
and
then
there
we
have
the
materials
I.
Don't
know.
If
you
guys
want
me
to
read
those
okay
and
then
for
the
metal
siding
at
the
end.
B
There
lap
see
metal
panels
or
sheet
or
corrugated
panels
are
allowed,
if
used
as
an
accent
to
include
not
more
than
20%
of
said
wall,
and
then
the
exterior
of
the
building
shall
have
varied
and
interesting
detailing
large
on
adorned
walls
shall
be
prohibited.
50
foot
or
more
all
large
walls
facing
a
public,
right-of-way
or
residential.
His
own
property
must
be
relieved
by
architectural
detailing
such
as
change
of
materials,
changing
color
offsets
and
other
significant
visual
relief
provided
in
a
manner
or
in
intervals
consistent
with
the
size.
Massive
scale
of
the
wall.
B
A
Intention
here
and
I,
don't
think
you
necessarily
have
to
have
a
background
architectural
design
to
to
understand
that
the
intention
is
to
have
some
variation
in
the
design.
So
it's
not
just
a
big
box
right,
but
we
also
don't
want
to
spell
that
out
in
such
a
way
that
it
becomes
a
burden
for
somebody
to
try
to
fit
within
the
narrow
confines
of
what
we're
defining
so
I
think
we
have
to
balance
that
a
little
bit
by
keeping
it
vague
enough.
Yeah.
F
A
F
A
F
The
issue
with
things
being
vague
means
then
there's
discretion
gets
to
be
involved
and
then
discretion
makes
things
difficult
to
defend
and
so
I
like
to
remove
the
discretion
from
the
decision-making.
If
we
can
as
much
as
we
can
I
find
out,
I'm
not
gonna,
hold
it
up,
but
I
just
think
the
first
time.
Well,
one
person
does
this
and
then
somebody
else
comes
in
and
they're
required
to
do
something
different,
because
we
didn't
like
the
way
the
first
guy
did
it
the
first
time
no.
F
D
Would
say
that
you
know
you
do
have
a
hard
line
there,
but
with
the
word
unadorned
large
unadorned
walls
shall
be
prohibited
and
then
the
the
next
sentence,
I,
would
say
kind
of
clarifies
the
meaning
of
what
adorned
means
and
what
kind
of
gives
you
some
ideas
of
what
you
can
do
to
make
yourself
not
adorned.
But
it's
something
is
either
adored
or
it's
not,
and
so
I
would
say
that
is
a
right
line
and.
B
Actually,
I
might
add
to
almost
I'm
thinking
that,
instead
of
having
that
the
stipulation
where
it
says
facing
a
public,
right-of-way
or
residentially
zoned
property
I
think
we
should
change
that
to
say
large
unadorned
walls
shall
be
prohibited
when
facing
a
public,
right-of-way
or
residential,
his
own
property
and
then
then
period
in
and
say
all
large
walls
must
be
relieved
by
architectural
or
instead
of
large.
We
could
say
unadorned,
probably
so,.
B
F
D
D
D
E
A
F
C
D
C
B
C
Could
have
a
100-foot
wall
unadorned
lakeside
and
you're
gonna
have
a
fair
amount
of
people
lakeside
that
would
be
traveling
and
traversing.
It
and
I
think
that
part
of
it
part
of
this
whole
process,
obviously
from
the
street
and
from
the
neighbors
it
want.
It
needs
to
look
good,
but
as
we're
floating
around
on
pontoons
at
what
done
should.
B
F
A
The
thought
here
so
this
isn't
just
the
stuff-
that's
immediately
adjacent
to
the
lake.
It
sits
in
this
radius
right
and
so,
if
you've
got
a
wall,
that's
facing
other
commercial
development
out
there.
It's
less
of
a
concern
for
us
because
we're
looking
at
the
aesthetic
to
the
to
the
street
to
the
lake
to
the
residential
neighborhoods.
F
C
B
B
Then
I
was
trying
to
come
up
with
adjectives
for
on
a
door
and
I
guess
plain
so
the
outside
storage
displaying
screen,
then
it
would
be
storage
or
display
of
items
outside.
It
is
limited
to
those
items
related
to
the
nature
of
the
business
occurring
within
the
primary
structure.
Outside
storage
or
display
shall
not
be
allowed
on
any
regular
parking
spaces.
Storage
of
excess
inventory
shall
be
screened
by
means
of
an
opaque
fence,
plant
materials
walls
or
earth
berms,
where
groupings
of
conifers
and
deciduous
shade
trees
are
utilized
for
screening.
B
In
order
to
provide
year-round
screening
a
minimum
of
50%
of
the
trees,
shall
we
can
difference
and
then
for
transitional
yards.
We
wanted
to
incorporate
this
like
we
do
in
the
Gateway
overlay
district
and
so
I
took
some
language
from
there
and
we
put
that
property
as
adjacent
to
residential
zone
districts
shall
maintain
15
feet
of
grass
on
on
the
side
yards,
to
extend
the
entire
length
of
the
property
boundaries
and
landscaping
and
screening
devices,
including
fences,
are
allowed
to
be
placed
within
the
transitional
yard.
B
And
then
we
get
to
the
boundary
Maps
there,
and
so
those
are
referenced
in
the
beginning
of
the
ordinance
and
then
this
that
just
depicts
where
a
property
can
petition
to
be
rezone
or
annexed
and
zoned
as
CL
and
so
then
to
the
boundary.
Is
there
because
we
don't
want
somebody
in
city
proper,
asking
to
rezone
to
CL,
because
these
are
only?
This
is
for
the
lake
and
lake
commercial
activity.
B
That
was
a
little
like
relateable,
so
that,
when
we're
looking
at
these
properties,
specifically
when
somebody's
looking
at
developing
that
it
would,
you
were
able
to
tell
that
it
wasn't
so
arbitrary
and
then
to
first
district
will
have
this
will
send
them
the
boundaries
and
we'll
have
this
on
our
GIS.
So
it'll
be
clear.
I.
B
So
the
we
didn't
have
car
wash
defined
in
our
ordinance,
so
I
defined
car
wash
and
then
stored
shops
is
a
new
one,
and
that
is
a
building
for
personal
use.
Only
as
a
storage
facility,
each
structure
is
allowed
to
have
water
and
water
and
sewer
utilities,
commercial
uses
and
living
quarters
are
prohibited
and
then
transit
station
is
an
area
or
building
used
for
transporting
them
good
people.
B
People
are
goods
by
vehicle
from
one
place
to
another,
and
that
was
because,
if,
if
you
say
that
we
have
a
trolley,
stop
there
someday
or
whatnot,
then
to
have
that
still
available,
because
the
other
there
was
a
different.
What
was
the
other
word
that
it
seemed
like
you
could
potentially
have
I
don't
care.
It
was
called
yeah
truck
terminal.
That's
what
it
was,
which
yeah
didn't
seem
like
something
that
we.
D
B
B
A
Think
is
the
storage
shop
ones
and
it's
topic:
that's
come
up
quite
a
few
times
over
the
years
difference
between
a
storage
unit
and
a
contractor
shop
we've
talked
about
it
in
relation
to
residential
garage
district.
So
the
key
here
is
this
is
a
storage
building
that
allows
for
water
and
sewer
which
a
storage
unit
does
not.
A
D
Mike
Lawrence
I've
been
here
for
a
couple
of
different
reasons
at
the
lake
and
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I,
hadn't,
I
didn't
wasn't
very
involved
in
this
at
all.
Michael
Hoyer
brought
this
up
and
the
staff
works
really
well
and
I
just
want
to
commend.
This
is
something
that
has
been
in.
The
works
have
been
worked
on
for
many
many
many
years,
and
it's
just
it's
it's
refreshing
to
to
see
something
like
this
could
get
actually
done
and
and
moved
forward
on.
B
Blake
had
kind
of
touched
on
it,
but
so
before
in
our
ordinance
we
had
the
storage
unit,
which
was
a
starred
shop,
but
you
couldn't
have
sewer
and
water.
And
then
the
only
thing
that
we
allowed,
that
was
storage
related,
was
a
contractor
shop.
So
and
then
that
was
actually
supposed
to
be
used
for
commercial
for
a
commercial
business,
not
personal
storage.
So
then
this
would
allow
for
somebody
to
have
a
storage
unit,
but
we're
calling
it
a
storage
shop
to
call
it
something
different
with
sewer
and
water
and.
A
People
that
want
to
have
some
recreational
vehicles
in
the
facility
or
if
they
want
to
you
know,
have
limited
access
to.
You
know
like
a
sink
and
a
drain
cleaning
fish.
You
know
we're
at
the
lake
here.
What
we
wanted
to
avoid
was
the
the
need
for
those
contractor
shops
which
are
really
buildings
where
somebody's
running
a
business
out
of
mm-hmm.
A
F
H
B
D
H
C
H
And
at
that
time,
I
don't
have
to
tell
anybody
what
I'm
going
to
be
putting
on
it.
Just
like
anything
else.
So
if
I
choose
to
do
that
with
my
neighbor's
property,
that's
a
hundred
feet.
I
can
have
then
as
long
as
I.
Just
you
say:
oh
yeah,
we
want
to
do
commercial
because
we
want
to
have
tax
money
revenue
coming
in,
which
is
the
reason
we're
changing
things
to
commercial.
We
want
it
to
be
more
accessible
to
people
at
the
lake.
H
We
want
to
serve
the
community
general
community,
better
all
the
reasons
I've
been
hearing
about.
Why
we're
doing
this,
and
so
it
would
be
then
up
to
me
I
get
it
changed
and
then
I
can
do
any
of
these
permitted
uses
one
through
eight
right,
so
I
can
have
a
retail
establishment
which
would
bring
in
taxes
the
services
establishment
that
would
bring
in
taxes
etc.
C
G
G
H
C
F
You're
going
to
see,
is
you
own,
your
house,
and
your
a
lot.
Your
neighbors
40
or
50
foot
lot
becomes
available.
I'm,
probably
going
to
maybe
build
my
mancave
storage
shop
on
that
to
make
my
entire
property
for
me
to
go
out
and
spend
twenty
five
hundred
three
thousand
dollars
a
running
foot
to
go
out
and
build
a
mancave
is
gonna,
be
very,
very
rare,
but.
B
A
A
Nobody's
gonna
buy
up
a
commercial
lot
for
this
use
because
you
can't
have
living
space
in
it.
You
can't
run
a
business
out
of
it,
and
so
it's
not
economical.
What
we're
doing
is
we're
we're
putting
this
in
the
district
to
serve
the
rest
of
the
bounds
of
the
district
right
right.
We're
not
just
looking
at
this
area
as
lakefront,
because
it's
not
about
just
the
way
I.
H
Understand
that
I
understand
that,
but
I
just
am
trying
to
understand
the
possibility
of
the
use
of
this.
If
I
had
the
money,
if
I
wanted
to
do
it,
this
is
something
I
could
do
and
I'm
understanding
Todd
to
say
if
I
want
to
buy
my
neighbor's
property.
I
could
still
do
this
anyway,
under
the
current
under
the
current
laws.
So.
B
H
H
E
Mr.
chairman,
if
I
made
two
one
aids
point,
if,
if
it
were
consideration,
the
board
would
want
to
make
I
mean
I
think
we
could
make
an
exception
to
the
sword
shop
on
the
lakefront
side.
If,
if
that
were
something
ward
to
want
to
entertain,
I
think
that
would
address
what
Wan
T
is
describing.
As
one
of
the
concerns
is,
do
we
want
this
as
a
primary
soil
use
on
a
lakeside,
lakeshore
lot,
I.
Think
it's
a
fair
question
to
ask
and
contemplate
here
is
we're
drafting
this
I've.
F
Been
to
lakes,
where
I
have
a
man
shop,
man
cave
store
shop,
whatever
the
heck,
you
want
to
call
it,
and
basically
it's
a
big
building
where
I
keep
my
boat
and
my
jet
skis.
I
don't
have
living
quarters
there,
but
I
got
the
things.
So
when
we
go
out
to
the
lake
we
just
to
there,
I
parked
the
car
on
the
roadside.
I
walk
in
the
building
get
in
the
boat
drive
it
out
right
down
into
the
lake,
so
I
think
it's
an
appropriate
use.
Again,
it's
gonna,
be
a
very
rare
use.
B
A
Really
see
it
being
an
issue
either
because
of
primarily
because
of
the
design
standards
as
well.
We've
we've
really
dialed
these
in
so
that
any
commercial
use
that
we
have
on
here
is
conducive
to
a
neighborhood
setting
right
from
the
setbacks
to
the
green
space
requirements,
the
maximum
impervious
surface,
the
types
of
building
materials,
everything
designed
to
make
whatever
the
building
is
inside
amenable
to
a
neighborhood
setting.
So
to
me,
I
just
don't
see
the
need.
H
Then
I'm
under
psych
I,
don't
know
where
it
fits
in,
and
maybe
this
is
another
ordinance,
but
we
don't
have.
Is
there
something
here
about
noise
and
light
expectations?
You
know
a
commercial
building
going
into
my
neighbor's
lot
next
door
to
me
is
going
to
quite
change
restaurant,
something
like
that
into
our
hundred-foot
law,
whatever
she
decides
to
do
whatever
I
decide
or
she
decides
to
do
or
I
decide
to
do.
But
there's
there
are
kind
of
factors
about
being
neighbors
other
than
just
how
it
looks.
F
Any
one
of
the
conditional
uses
that
you
see
listed,
we
had
a
conditional
use
that
was
just
before
us.
We,
as
a
Board
of
Adjustment,
have
to
look
at
things
such
as
parking
screening
lighting,
refuse
access
all
those
things
so
on
any
one
of
those
conditional
uses,
the
carwash
Motel
hotel
storage
units,
the
office
bar
tavern
transit
station
mm-hmm.
If
any
one
of
those
things
were
to
pop
up
I,
get
the
property
rezone
they
come
back
in
and
ask
for
a
conditional
use.
We
would
look
at
lighting,
we
would
look.
F
B
F
H
Nothing
that
there's
an
expectation
that
that
happened,
though
I
mean
it's
not
something
that
needs
to
be
done.
There's
no
ordinance!
That's
my
question.
There's
no
you're
suggesting
what
might
happen
what
would
be
appropriate
to
happen,
but
there's
nothing.
That's
saying
that
that
is
what
is
going
to
happen
if
I'm
understanding
correctly
and.
F
D
H
H
They
have
said
it
doesn't
matter
what
I
say,
and
so
it's
I'm
just
coming
to
with
these
questions,
because
I
know
people
have
them
and
they
are
absolutely
discouraged
from
coming
here
and
asking
questions
because
they
don't
think
they
can
make
any
difference.
So
that's
why
I'm
here
asking
the
question
just
not
just
about
me
and
my
property.
It's
about
the
intention
of
late
commercial,
which
I
agree
to
I.
Think
you've
done
a
great
job,
I
think
it's
really
important,
because
I
have
been
on
lakes
where
and
all
over
the
world.
H
I
was
just
on
Swiss
lakes,
where
there
are
things
there
are
codes
that
keep
that
beautiful.
Wherever
I
went
along
the
sides
of
the
lake,
so
we
don't
have
to
go
to
our
lowest
common
denominator.
We
can
go
high
and
still
meet
the
intention
of
this,
but
we
can
go
high
so
that
in
the
future
this
is
truly
attractive
and
beautiful.
That
would
be
my
intention
so.
A
That's
what
this
is
kind
of
infest,
the
intention
of
the
board
here
as
well,
and
the
city
staff
in
designing
this
ordinance.
Mr.
Robie,
you
had
mentioned
the
the
city,
landscaping
and
lighting
standards
apply
across
the
communities.
So
it's
not
just
about
the
the
CL
district
and
well,
it's
not
necessarily
spelled
out
directly
here.
It's
something
that
has
looked
at
across
every
development
area
within
town
I,.
F
Just
built
a
building
20
feet
from
planned
development
in
the
northeast
part
of
town
and
our
lighting
has
to
stay
on
our
property
and
I'm.
It
wasn't
because
staff
looked
at
it
in
the
staff
said.
This
is
what
it
has
to
be
so
I'm
gonna,
guess
that
the
same
thing
would
happen
at
the
lake
in
this
situation
as
well.
D
A
Where
we've
gone
above
and
beyond,
and
in
this
district
compared
to
some
of
the
others
is,
is
really
in
the
additional
design
standards
that
we've
placed
on
it
from
the
architectural
look
and
feel
to
the
increase
green
space
to
the
transitional
yards
that
we've
got
in
between
residential.
So
not
only
do
they
have
to
meet
the
the
same
design
standards
as
other
commercial
Lots
with
in
town,
but
we've
we've
added
additional
caveat
to
ensure
that
we
have
that
nice,
aesthetic
that
nice
neighborhood,
the
nice
lake
feel
right.
So.
H
That
is,
and
I
and
I
honor
you
for
that
and
I
have
paid
attention.
That's
why
I'm
here
to
the
details
and
how
these
are
different
and
I
think
this
is
tremendously
important
question.
If
I
am
someone
who
has
a
speaking
of
the
details,
the
question
came
up
who
who,
if
this
isn't
meeting
standard,
who
actually
responds
to
this
and
I,
didn't
get
a
clear
answer,
because
it
because
I
heard
the
question
well,
who
is
the
gatekeeper
and
how
does
that
to
action?
Take
place
and
and
I
just
don't
know,
I'm
wondering.
E
So
in
the
your
chair,
if
I
mean
the
development
review
process,
if
a
lot
were
to
be
zoned
Cl,
for
example,
it
would
have
to
meet
all
these
zoning
sexual
requirements,
but
there's
also
the
building
code
requirements
in
commercial
site
plan
requirements
of
the
city
administers
so
in
that
process.
When
they
submit
the
plans
once
we
determine
what
type
of
a
building
application
permit
it's
for.
H
E
H
Know
that
there's
a
certain
view,
it's
better
to
ask
forgiveness
than
ask
permission
and
that's
always
a
kind
of
concern,
a
practical
concern
when
we're
dealing
with
things
like
this
and
if
I
as
a
resident
I,
maybe
I'm,
just
a
citizen.
Maybe
it's
not
my
anything
to
do
with
my
property
but
I'm.
Looking
at
it
and
I've
been
paying
attention
and
I
say:
gosh,
that's
not
meeting
the
standard.
What
option
do
I
have?
Does
the
public?
Can
we
be
gatekeepers?
Well.
F
You
can
talk
to
the
city
attorney,
but
he
can
talk
to
you
all
about.
What's
something
called
a
writ
of
mandamus
and
it's
a
it's
a
court
proceeding
that
you
could
tell
you
city,
you're,
not
enforcing
your
ordinances
and
you
can
take
the
city
to
court
and
say
enforce
your
just
because
they're
gatekeepers
aren't
keeping
the
cows
in,
but.
C
D
Sidewalk
snow
removal,
ordinance
I,
mean
everyone
with
sidewalk
is
required
to
shovel
their
snow,
and
if
someone
doesn't-
and
you
know,
if
your
neighbor
reports
you
you
know,
the
code
enforcement
officer
will
call
them
knock
on
your
door
and
say
this
is
out
of
compliance.
You
need
to
correct
it.
I'm.
F
H
H
B
H
So
if
someone
wanted
to
do
that,
we
would
go
through
the
same
process
of
having
two
hearings
and
notification
of
neighbors.
All
of
that,
then,
the
question
would
be:
we've
made
some
changes
earlier,
because
people
wanted
to
get
their
properties
changed
before
this
happened
and
they
become
c3
proper.
Is
there
any
expectation
that
the
c3
properties
which
are
now
inside
the
lake
zone,
the
lake
commercial,
maintain
these
standards?
I
mean
I
know
they
are?
They
are
still
c3s
in
the
kinds
of
things
they
could
do.
F
H
I
that
wasn't
my
question.
Thank
you
for
that
answer,
but
that
wasn't
my
question.
It
wasn't
clear.
My
question
is
so:
I
have
a
c3
property
and
I
want
to
keep
it
c3
in
terms
of
the
things
I
want
to
put
on
it.
But
do
you
expect
people?
Is
there
any
retroactive
expectation
that
the
kinds
of
buildings
that
they
put
in,
thus
the
things
that
you've
thought
of
so
carefully
about
how
the
building
the
face
of
the
building
and
how
it
looks
toward
the
public
and
how
it
looks
toward
the
street?
B
F
Would
I
expect
to
apply
the
standards
of
CL
to
those
properties?
You
could
use
a
hockey
analogy.
Those
ones
got
past
the
goalie
before
the
rules
were
implemented,
so
the
rules
that
were
existing
at
the
time
of
their
initial
request
should
be
the
rules
that
they
get
to
utilize
moving
forward
and
which
is
what
and.
B
What
that's,
what
really
catalyzed
us
getting
the
CL
district
in
place
is
because
those
requests
were
coming
and
we
wanted
to
protect
the
residential
properties
that
were
at
the
lake,
because
we
I
mean
we
felt
the
need
for
it.
So
then
that's
really
the
catalyst
to
to
creating
this,
even
though
it
has
been
in
the
comp
plan
since
2005
to
have
a
lake
district,
so
I.
H
A
A
D
F
B
A
A
A
A
My
travel
schedule
doesn't
allow
me
to
to
be
present
at
as
many
of
these
as
I'd
like
to
be
I.
Don't
want
to
quit
being
a
part
of
this
board,
but
I
would
like
to
step
back
from
the
chairman
role.
Give
somebody
an
opportunity
that
that
can
be
more
active
in
this
a
chance
to
to
act
as
the
board
chairperson,
so
brandy,
I'd,
looked
back
in
the
agendas
and
I
couldn't
find
the
last
time
that
we
actually
had
an
election.
A
A
F
B
D
D
B
F
B
B
F
Go
there
and
you
can
find
it
it's
it's
there,
it's
a
rather
large
document,
so
it's
way
too
big
too
too,
too
prone
to
probably
print
if
you,
unless
you
have
a
big
printer,
the
other
quick
thing
again.
Mr.
Muller
has
informed
me
that
the
CL
district
that
was
passed
tonight
is
not
a
part
of
that
draft,
but
will
be
incorporated
at
the
time
of
the
public
hearing
sounds
good.
B
D
B
B
B
A
D
C
F
Gis
access
again
for
everybody
on
the
board
and
you're
gonna
come
up
to
this
thing
is
called
map
net
slide
down,
and
you
can
see
a
lot
of
different
counties
where
there's
different
GIS
websites,
we
host
them,
pull
it
up
and
most
everything
that
that
the
city
staff
has
there's
a
few
things
that
we
don't
put
out
there
for
John
public
review.
Is
you
can
zoom
in
you?
Can
do
searches,
there's
just
all
kinds
of
different
data?
Click,
click,
click,
a
parcel,
tells
you
honey,
that's
the
past
and
there's
different
information,
but
their
zoning
ordinances.
B
Actually
so
we
should
give
a
we'll
give
a
plug
for
the
March
12th
meeting.
We're
gonna
have
a
flood
prep
meeting
at
Lake
area
on
March
12th
at
7
o'clock
p.m.
and
that
too
we're
going
we're
gonna
have
a
handout
so
that
people
know
about
this
service
that
if
they,
if
they
have
they're
questioning
what
their
elevation
is
or
you
know
so
they
can
look
at
what
the
flood
stage
of
the
lake
is
and
what
their
what
their
property
is
at.
It
gives
them
an
idea.
It's
not
accurate.
F
Office
has
worked
with
water
municipal
utilities
to
plot
various
structures
and
water
levels
at
the
lake.
So
when
we
know
the
elevation
is
this,
it
will
determine
whether
or
not
at
least
the
city
of
White
House
municipal
utilities
are
under
water,
which
would
then
give
you
a
good
indication
of
whether
or
not
your
home
might
be
based
upon
the
elevation,
and
so
that's
a
data
thing.
That's
been
worked
with
ryan
hartley
in
our
office.