►
From YouTube: Public Works, Finance & Safety Meeting 12-21-2020
Description
Public Works, Finance & Safety Meeting 12-21-2020
C
B
D
D
B
D
A
B
D
C
C
A
Thank
you.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
public
input,
and
this
is
the
time
reserve
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward
and
do
so
there's
no
one
in
the
room.
So
if
there's
anyone
online,
please
indicate
that
you
would
like
to
speak
by
saying
your
name
and
then
request
permission
to
speak.
A
A
B
D
D
A
Motion
carries
thank
you
item
six
is
the
regular
agenda
and
we'll
start
with
a
approval
of
construction
change
order
number
one
final:
with
donek
inc
for
the
2020
pmsc
neighborhood
street
reconstruction
project
number
2004
for
a
decrease
of
twenty
five
thousand
two
hundred
three
dollars.
Sixteen
cents
bringing
the
total
contract
cost
to
three
hundred
sixty
seven
thousand
six
hundred
forty
one
dollars
nine
cents
and
I
will
have
heath
von.
I,
the
public
works
director
city,
engineer,
explain
this
after
I
get
a
motion
motion.
D
A
E
Yes,
absolutely
thank
you
mayor.
This
change
order
is
in
relation
to
one
of
our
annual
payment
management
system
projects.
Council
recalls,
we've
split
those
up
into
three
different
projects:
pavement
management
system,
a
b
and
c.
This
is
schedule
c
from
this
this
current
year,
2020
and
it
related
to
improvements
on
14th
avenue,
northeast
and
5th
avenue
southwest
this.
This
particular
schedule
of
the
project
evolved
a
little
bit
because
of
the
necessity
to
do
some.
E
E
E
They
were
checking
depths
and
thicknesses
as
the
paving
crew
commenced
with
their
work
on
this
project
by
having
those
the
staff
in
the
field
and
that
presence
on
this
project
I
think
really
paid
off
and
is
why
we're
seeing
a
little
bit
of
a
cost
savings
on
it.
So
I
give
that
some
of
that
credit
to
our
staff
and
their
their
work
that
they
did
on
this.
So
with
that
I'll
stand
by
for
any
questions
that
the
council
might
have.
A
A
A
E
E
E
E
Most
of
this
work
that
this
change
order
came
from
is
related
to
the
hall
route.
That
was
initially
used
on
the
project
and
had
to
be
reconstructed
once
it
got
done
being
pummeled
as
being
a
haul
route.
So
it
had
a
little
bit
extra
expense
in
there
to
rebuild
that
section
of
pavement
back
to
what
it
needed
to
be
and
with
that
we've
got
todd
syrey
the
airport
manager
online
with
us-
and
here
I
can
stand
by
for
any
questions.
A
D
A
D
A
C
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
also
with
me,
john
smalls,
in
the
lineup
turn
it
over
to
him
shortly.
We
don't
come
to
you
with
good
news.
This
was
a
shock
to
john
and
myself
to
how
this
was
found
through
a
recently
entered
into
preventative
maintenance
contract,
but
john
has
done
the
the
leg
work
with
the
contractors,
our
consultants,
so
john
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
for
explanation
to
the
committee.
C
G
After
after
we
signed
on
the
the
agreement,
with
gnr
incorporated,
sioux
falls
who
installed
the
the
system
and
what
the
system
is
is
one
of
two
huge
rooftop
units
that
above
the
the
pool
and
it
affects
the
air
flow
and
the
air
quality
of
the
pool
and
when
they
went
through
the
whole
system.
This
fall.
G
They
found
a
leak
and
we
were
having
situations
with
the
air
quality
in
the
pool
and
and
they
found
a
leak
in
the
refrigerant
circuit,
which
caused
water
to
leak
into
the
whole
system,
and
it
just
domino
effect
where
it
ruined
the
heat.
Exchanger.
The
compressor,
the
coil
filter,
dryer
contractor
contactor
and
receiver,
which
it's
just
huge
pieces
of
the
of
the
unit
and
and
it's
about
the
worst
scenario
that
that
we
could
could
phantom
to
have.
G
And
besides
replacing
these
issues,
these
pieces
also
there's
100
gallons
of
glycol
and
then
also
we
will
need
to
rent
a
crane
to
to
lift
the
whole
unit
up.
And
I
asked
him,
I
said:
is
this
something
that
was
just
abused
by
us
by
whoever
came
up
and
worked
on
him
in
the
in
the
past
or
an
act
of
god?
And
and
he
said
it's
just
no
idea-
there
was
a
hole
that
somehow
was
created.
If
it
was,
it
was
punctured
whatever.
G
Maybe
when
it
was
installed,
but
nobody's
gonna,
step
up
and
say
yeah,
we
did
it,
you
know,
and-
and
maybe
it
was
an
accident
I
don't
know,
but
we
had
to
it's
something
we
have
to
replace.
The
total
cost
was
67
284
dollars,
but
with
the
service
agreement
that
we
have
with
gnr,
we
automatically
get
a
20
discount
on
labor
and
tool,
labor
and
equipment,
and
so
it
came
to
the
58
491..
G
Now,
if
you
guys
approve
it,
then
terry
will
sign
off
on
it
and
they
will
order
the
equipment
and
it'll
take
about
four
to
five
weeks.
They
have
it
up
and
running
the
best
they
can
until
they
get
repaired,
but
they
will
not
do
it
during
cold
weather
because
there's
welding
and
soldering
going
on
and
they
want
to
have
it
so
they'd
be
able
to
provide
a
proper
warranty
with
it.
G
So
we're
probably
looking
at
you
know,
late
march
early
april,
it'll
be
about
a
week-long
project,
and
that's
so,
and
we
really
don't
have
an
option
because
we
do
have
issues
with
the
airflow
and
the
quality
of
the
air
we've
the
past
a
couple
years
now
we
had
issues
with
the
swim
team.
A
lot
of
the
kids
were
getting
sick
and
and
and
to
a
point
where
they
quit
swimming
and
that's
so
it's
something
we
need
to
do.
So.
A
D
G
G
H
G
H
G
H
G
I
can
go
up
there
and
easily
locate,
you
know,
have
you
know,
find
the
location
of
it,
but
you
know
I
don't
you
know
we
can.
We
can
go
after
whoever
you
want,
and
you
know
gnr
and
the
company
that
that
designed
and
makes
these
units
are
o'connor
and
they're
out
of
canada
and
that,
but
you
know
who's
going
to
step
up
and
say
yeah.
I
think
we
might
have
poked
a
hole
in
you
know.
G
I
mean
at
this
this
cost
of
money
and
and
that's
something
that
we
have
dealt
with
ever
since
we
opened
the
doors
that
facility
where
people
are
pointing
fingers.
You
know
at
each
other,
but
nobody
will
ever
take
up
any
ownership
on
once
the
warranty's
off.
Then
it's
just
there's
no
ownership
after
that.
Yes,.
H
I
guess
I'd
respond
to
that.
This
way,
john,
I
think
we,
it
would
be
nice
to
know
how
it
happened.
So
perhaps
we
don't
it
doesn't
happen
again,
but
the
other
part,
I
think,
is
if
it's
something
to
do
with
the
manufacturer.
If
it's
something
to
do
with
the
system,
I
I
think
that's
important
to
know
I
mean
how
that
is.
G
I
will
that's
fine,
I
can
call
tomorrow
and
and
visit
them
and
and-
and
I
did
you
know
like
I
said
I
I
mentioned
it-
you
know-
was
it
anything
that
you
know
was
on
our
part
or
because,
basically
all
we
do
up,
there
is
change
filters.
You
know
as
far
as
the
the
units
you
know,
we
we
don't
touch
anything
else
than
that,
but
was
it
something
you
know
looked
like
it
was,
you
know
damaged,
or
was
it
like
that
or
what?
H
G
C
I
G
G
F
I
My
question
is,
I
picked
up
a
little
bit
of
this
issue
when
it
started
happening
a
while
ago.
So
the
question
is
this:
if
we
fix
this,
will
it
fix
the
problem?
Is
it
a
performance
problem?
My
concern
is:
is
it
a
design
problem
or
we
think
the
design's
okay?
If
it's
not
designed
properly,
we're,
probably
going
to
always
have
the
issue.
G
G
But
at
the
time
was
the
then
they
found
out
the
issues
with
the
the
leakage.
So
I
said
well,
let's
just
wait
till
until
we
get
you
know
this
fixed
the
leak
and
that
and
see
and
the
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
they
got
it
going.
You
know
it's
not
100,
but
they
do
have
it
operating,
and
I
know
it
has
improved
and
I've
been
talking
to
the
swim,
coach
and
and
the
swim
team
manager
on
a
regular
basis.
G
Making
you
know
asking
and
that
and
recently
like
during
their
their
last
swim,
meet
the
staff,
the
coaches
or
the
the
people
that
worked
the
meet.
That
was
there
all
day.
They
said
they
had
sore
throats
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
and
and
that,
but
but
far
as
the
kids
on
a
it
has,
they
felt
improved
in
that,
but,
as
I
mentioned,
they
have
it
up
and
going.
But
you
know
it's
not
at
a
hundred
percent
and
it's
something
they
just
can't
continue
to
do
so.
G
G
And
what
that
is,
is
it's
at
a
inadequate
pressure
of
the
air
coming
in
and
forcing
the
air
that's
there
out,
because
we
had
it
the
air
tested.
Last,
oh,
I
want
to
say
early
february
late
january,
early
february
and
they
said
and
what
they
found
out,
that
the
air
you
know
above
the
water
above
the
deck,
maybe
up
to
six
feet.
High
was
just
not
you
know,
was
not
good
quality
air
and
that,
and
what
was
happening
was
it
wasn't.
G
A
C
G
A
We
had
issues
before
the
year
was
up.
We
just
had
no
idea
what
was
wrong
and
everybody
was
pointing
fingers.
Like
john
said,
nobody
take
any
responsibility.
Nobody
knew
at
that
time.
There
was
a
hole
in
any
line,
but
if,
if
this
is
what
caused
that,
I
I
think
we
got
to
keep
that
in
mind
any
other
questions
or
comments.
C
Just
mayor
the
you
know,
depending
what
the
committee
does
or
the
council,
the
financing
aspect
will
be
brought
back
forth
right
now,
just
with
production
time.
We
wanted
to
just
get
the
authorization
to
move
forward.
I
have
been
working
with
kristin
on
on
means
of
financing
and
we
do
have
dollars
available
that
are
sitting
in
contingencies
or
for
cash
balances
to
be
able
to
to
fund
it
depending
on
what
direction
the
council
wants
to
go.
D
I'm
going
to
direct
this
to
to
our
city
attorney
matt,
I
don't
know,
are
you
have
you
been
in
the
loop
on
this?
I
guess
you
know
this
really
rubs
me
the
wrong
way.
I
mean,
like
sarah
said,
we've
had
troubles
with
this
when
we
open
the
door
from
when
we
open
the
door
and
do
we
do
you
have
any
do
we
have
any
recourse
in
your
opinion
on
this
matt
or
maybe
you're,
not
that
up
to
speed
on
the
whole
situation?
But
I
I
don't
like
this.
I
G
G
You
know
thing
is
right.
After
you
know
time
they
complete
it.
It's
going
to
be
heading
into
the
summer.
We
still
will
have
a
swim
team,
but
there'll
be
no
swim
meets
and
and
that,
but
the
kids
will
still
be
there.
So
you
know
that
that's
what
affected
you
know,
the
the
day-to-day
people
that
go
into
swim,
laps,
they're,
not
in
there
that
long
aqua,
size
classes,
they're,
they're,
they're,
not
there!
That
long.
H
Yeah
thanks
mayor
just
you
know
I
gotta
say
john.
I
know
enough
about
hvac
equipment
and
refrigeration
to
be
dangerous,
but
I
do
know
that
installation
of
some
of
these
systems
is
critical
and
how
they're,
how
these
tubes
and
how
the
components
are
soldered
together
and
with
what
and
I
mean,
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
come
into
play
on
those
systems
and
typically
they
will
pressurize
those
systems
at
a
high
pressure
and
hold
it.
H
You
know
they
can
test
the
pressure
in
those
for
a
long
period
of
time.
So
if
there's
leaks,
they
they
normally
will
show
up,
but
sometimes
those
things
happen
in
if
the
building
shifts
or
there's
excessive
vibration
in
some
of
the
equipment.
Those
kind
of
things
too,
but
I
I
will
follow
up
john
with
this,
because
I
I
would
really
like
to
know
kind
of
where
that's
at
so
we
get
a
better
idea
of
how
it
happened.
G
H
Okay
and
I'll
just
say
to
to
councilman
drudemski
his
question,
you
know,
nor
the
maintenance
guy
probably
is
not
going
to
have
the
sophistication,
I'm
not
saying
he
doesn't,
but
typically
would
not
for
that
type
of
equipment.
When
you
start
getting
to
the
compressors
and
all
the
other
stuff,
that's
hooked
into
that
system.
I
know
not
to
the
person
doing
that,
but
that's
that
can
get,
I
think,
fairly
sophisticated.
G
But
I
could
let
me
if
you
interrupt
here,
what
I
can
do
also
is
we
have
a
good
working
relationship
with
active
heating
and
and
I
can
and
they
work
they
work
closely
with
gnr
also,
and
that
so
I
could
talk
to
jason
roricks
and
see
if
maybe
somebody
up
there
just
can
kind
of
be
around
too.
You
know
that
so.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
john.
E
Just
briefly
mayor
just
for
whatever
it's
worth
having
administered
a
good
number
of
facility
contracts
like
this
john's
spot,
on
that
a
bumper-to-bumper
warranty
is
typically
12
months,
it's
kind
of
like
buying
a
new
car.
I
use
that
analogy
anyway.
Now
there
may
be
other
warranties
within
that
new
car,
like
your
engine
or
your
transmission,
that
have
a
longer
extended
warranty
and
oftentimes.
A
C
A
D
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
This
is
simply
a
purchase
that
the
airport's
gearing
up
and
wanting
to
get
approval
on
to
try
to
make
use
of
this
piece
of
equipment
here,
yet
through
this
winter
season.
Fortunately,
they
haven't
had
a
use
for
it.
Yet
at
this
point,
but
this
money
is
budgeted
in
2021
for
the
purchase
of
a
bobcat,
what's
called
a
tool,
cat
piece
of
equipment,
along
with
several
components
of
attachments
that
would
go
with
this
naspo,
is
similar
to
something
like
source.
E
Well,
it's
an
umbrella
of
government
bid,
type
of
types
of
equipment,
and
things
like
that
that
we,
of
course,
as
a
government
agency,
are
then
able
to
purchase
directly
from
bobcat
of
watertown,
happens
to
have
an
approved
naspo
bid
for
this
particular
piece
of
equipment.
This
something
todd,
cyres
worked
out
done
the
research
on
and
presented
also
to
the
airport
board
for
their
approval
and
recommendation
as
well
and
stand
by
for
any
questions
that
the
council
might
have.
E
E
Yeah
they
have
they've
had,
I
think,
todd
refer
to
it
as
a
hand-me-down
type
of
piece
of
equipment.
They've
had
some
good
luck
with
that
when
they've
had
availability
to
use
it,
but
it's
kind
of
one
of
those
things
where
it's
needed
in
multiple
areas
in
multiple
divisions,
and
so
this
will
help
provide
the
adequate
amount
of
equipment
where
it's
where
it's
needed
and
todd.
I
let
you
chime
in
that
too.
If
you
got
anything
to
expand
on
there.
C
The
golf
course
is
actually
using
the
schisterian
blower,
I
believe,
terry,
if
you're
still
online
here,
maybe
you
can
explain,
but
we
we
have
shared
it
between
departments
and,
unfortunately,
it
just
gets
used
at
multiple
departments
at
the
same
time,
and
this
would
free
up
the
golf
course
to
use
the
skid
steer
and
blower
they
have
available
over
there
yeah.
I.
B
C
A
C
C
B
C
C
I
A
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
there's,
actually,
three
of
these
similar
items
coming
up
here,
there's
two
more
additional
to
this:
one:
bmp
maintenance
agreements,
their
best
management
practice,
maintenance
agreements.
These
are
essentially
the
agreements
that
the
landowners
are
entering
into
with
the
city
that
stipulate
the
requirements
to
maintain
their
detention
ponds.
A
detention
pond
is
one
one
form
of
a
bmp,
a
storm
water,
best
management
practice
and
commonly
there.
Those
bmps
as
far
as
permanent
ones
are
concerned,
they're
commonly
installed
in
the
form
of
a
detention
pond.
E
E
If
I
could
we'd
like
to
move
forward
with
these
and
execute
them
administratively,
and
just
have
the
city
engineer
sign
off
on
these
maintenance
agreements,
they
I've
bounced
that
idea
off
the
mayor
and
the
city
attorney,
and
we
believe
that
chapter
23
of
our
city
ordinances
would
allow
us
that
latitude,
but
I
know
we've
always
brought
them
to
council
in
the
past
and
so
before,
making
that
change.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
the
public
works
committee
was
okay
with
that
why
the
city
attorney
thought
that
be
amicable.
E
That's
a
great
question:
councilman
roby,
the
the
language
in
them
are
very
similar
each
time.
Of
course,
the
land
description
changes
and
maybe
some
of
the
descriptive
language
on
what
the
best
management
practice
is.
You
know
sometimes
it
might
not
be
a
full-blown
detention
pond,
so
there
might
be
some
logistics
that
way
that
change
from
one
agreement
to
the
next
but
overarching
the
language
remains
the
same.
A
A
All
right,
thank
you.
So
we
have
two
more
of
these
that
are
similar,
but
does
anybody
have
any
qualms
about
staff
administratively
approving
these
to
have
the
city
engineer,
so
they
are
pretty
much
the
same.
I'm
in
fact,
I
did
a
lot
of
these
and
there's
the
only
things
that
you
really
change
are
the
owners
name
and,
of
course,
the
specific
legal
description
and
what
the
pawns
are,
but
they're
all
pretty
much
the
same.
I
wrote
that
table
in
2007
or
eight
and
we're
still
using
it.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that
administrative
rule
or
allowing
it.
I
guess
I
just
want
to
know
is
there.
I
can't
envision
a
scenario
where
a
property
owner
would
have
a
problem
with
this,
but
if
a
property
owner
did
have
a
problem,
what
would
be
their
recourse?
Would
they
still
have
a
policy
or
procedure.
A
A
A
E
No,
I
have
not
personally-
and
I
think
too
mayor
to
your
point.
I
think
it
lends
to
the
fact
that
it's
in
the
storm
water,
ordinance,
chapter
23,
you
know
mandate
by
the
epa
down
through
the
south
dakota
dnr,
and
I
think
it's
just
a
well-known
common
fact
that
these
most
these
businesses
and
in
commercial
and
industrial
property
just
know
that
that's
a
level
of
responsibility
that
they
hold.
But
the
councilman's
point.
E
I
Well,
they're:
the
actions
are
being
required
in
the
in
the
agreement
are
required
by
ordinance,
so
if
they
they
didn't
want
to
take
the
actions
that
were
requiring
by
the
agreement,
we'd
have
to
change
the
ordinance
in
theory.
If
somebody
blocked
at
actually
signing
one,
our
recourse
would
be
to
withhold.
I
Of
the
plat
or
depending
on
where
we're
at
in
the
process
the
building
permit,
and
then
they
can
lobby
the
council
to
to
change
the
ordinance.
But
again
what
we're
asking.
What
we're
requiring
by
the
agreement
is
actually
require
by
ordinance
just
the
formalization
of
those
requirements
and
a
document
that'll
run
with
the
land.
F
C
H
C
C
A
Right,
thank
you.
Okay.
Let's
move
on
to
item
f,
which
is
council
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
stormwater
best
management
practice;
maintenance
agreement
for
lot
three
of
calvin
industrial
park.
First
edition
have
motion
by
robin
in
a
second
by
holleen
and
heath
want
to
tell
us
about
this
one.
Please.
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
This
is
the
same
similar
action
here,
of
course,
also
in
the
calvin
industrial
park
subdivision.
This
one
is
for
lot,
three,
which
I
believe
is
for
east
side
implement,
if
I
remember
correctly
up
top
my
head
here,
but
same
thing,
outlining
the
responsibilities
of
the
landowner
to
keep
their
detention
bond
maintained.
A
C
A
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
this
again
same
thing
outlining
responsibility
as
a
landowner
to
maintain
their
detention
pond.
This
is
in
pheasant
ridge,
eighth
edition,
and
I
would
have
to
defer
to
brandy
to.
Let
me
know
exactly
who
this,
what
business
this
is,
but
a
similar
situation.
They
recently
constructed
a
private
detention
pond
for
their
own
ownership
and
maintenance.
A
B
D
C
H
A
I
B
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I've
got
my
screen
shared
here
and
I'll
walk
through
a
few
different
pieces
of
information
with
the
public
works
committee.
This
is
obviously
in
relation
to
10th
avenue
north
our
reconstruction
project
up
there
and,
as
you
recall,
we've
had
some
preliminary
discussions
on
the
need
to
make
some
sanitary
sewer
improvements.
E
E
E
E
Now,
if
you
look
at
this,
each
four
of
these
have
their
individual
service
that
comes
out
to
brought
the
property
line,
but
you'll
also
notice,
then
they're
all
combined
into
one
shared
service
that
ties
into
the
city
main
over
here
in
third
street,
so
that
this
setup,
this
configuration
is
really
in
a
nutshell,
what
we're
trying
to
correct
anytime.
We
have
new
development.
Now,
today,
it's
required
that
each
separate
lot
each
separate
structure
have
its
own
individual
sewer
service
connection.
E
E
E
We
would
extend
the
sewer
main
some
some
distance
here
of
oh,
maybe
100
feet
and
then
appropriately
connect
each
one
of
these,
with
these
yellow
service
connections
to
the
city's
sewer
main
and
what
that
does.
Why
that's
a
benefit
to
the
city.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
how
that's
a
benefit
to
these
homeowners,
but
why
that's
a
benefit
to
the
city
is
then,
once
these
individual
homes
are
connected
appropriately,
that
that
very
much
diminishes?
E
I'm
afraid,
if
we
leave
these
like
this,
what
could
happen
is
you
will
see
five
years
from
now
ten
years
from
now?
Something
goes
wrong
with
these
shared
lines,
and
these
homeowners
are
then
required
to
tear
up
the
public
infrastructure
in
order
to
get
access
and
appropriate
individual
connection
to
the
sewer
mains.
E
So
that's
what
this
yellow
line
work
does
it
helps
clean
that
up?
There
are
a
few
locations
throughout
10th
avenue
that
we're
proposing
to
do
this.
Here's
a
stretch
of
main
that
we
would
add
for
about
the
entirety
of
a
full
block
here,
and
it
helps
correct
again
with
these
yellow
lines.
It
gets
these
homes
individually
connected,
and
it
removes
these
green
shared
service
connections
again
here,
there's
a
shared
one.
E
E
Now,
if
we
just
assess
the
service
lines,
that
is
approximately
a
little
over
two
thousand
dollars
a
piece.
Now,
that's
going
to
vary
on
a
per
lot
basis,
depending
on
the
linear
footage
of
service
line,
but
just
a
real
rough
estimate,
you're
looking
at
a
little
over
two
thousand
dollars
per
property
owner.
D
E
Yes,
great
questions
as
far
as
the
extent
that
the
property
owners
have
been
contacted
on
these
costs
I'll.
Let
marcy
expand
on
that,
but
first
I'll
address
your
second
part
of
your
question
this
this
amount.
If
we
were
to
assess
let's
say
we
took
option
two
and
we
assessed
the
service
line
work
to
each
property
owner.
E
We
would
do
that
through
the
formal
assessment
process
and
follow
state
statutes
regarding
the
assessments
for
public
improvements,
and
that
could
then
be
spread
out
over
a
10-year
time
frame,
and
I
believe
our
interest
is
a
little
high.
It's
like,
I
believe,
10
percent
kristen
could
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
there,
but
this
would
essentially
then
be
spread
out
over
a
10-year
time
frame,
which
becomes
all
the
more
palatable
for
any
given
homeowner
to
be
able
to
afford
in
that
respect.
F
E
Yes,
councilman
radimski,
it's
another
good
question.
We
absolutely
have
a
lot
of
areas
in
town
that
are
that
are
set
up
and
structured
the
same
way
and
I'll
use
marcy's
point
she
just
made
as
a
differential,
a
differential
in
my
mind
on
how
we
could
handle
this
one
by
assessing
only
the
the
service
lines
and
not
the
mains
on
new
development.
E
Yes,
the
the
main
construction
and
the
service
line.
Work
is
completely
the
developer's
responsibility
or
the
landowner's
responsibilities,
and
that's
the
conventional
way
that
we
would
build
something
out
and,
of
course,
to
our
standards
today
they
would
be
required
to
give
each
individual
building
their
own
private
service
line.
E
The
way
they
are
that
there
be
a
little
bit
of
a
negotiation
or
give
and
take
or
a
compromise
or
whatever
we
want
to
call
it.
They
would
say:
okay,
the
city
agrees.
We
would
extend
our
public
maine
to
this
extent,
but
then
each
homeowner
would
still
be
required
to
cover
the
cost
for
their
service
line
work
and
that's
where,
because
it's
a
project
like
this
of
this
nature,
where
we're
building
a
brand
new
road
for
blocks
and
blocks
over
a
collect
on
a
collector
street.
E
I
think
that's
one
determining
factor
in
my
mind
if
we
ran
into
an
issue
down
the
road
just
hypothetically,
where
two
homeowners
had
a
shared
service
line
and
they
needed
to
make
some
corrections,
but
it
was
on
a
street
anywhere
in
town
that
we're
not
doing
a
full-blown
collector
reconstruction
project.
Like
this
I
would
say
yes,
that
cost
would
be
the
homeowners
alone
to
bear
for
them
to
correct
their
situation,
but
because
of
the
nature
of
this
one,
that's
why
we've
laid
out
these
options
that
we
have
for
consideration.
H
I
I'm
sorry
mayor,
I
I
thought
I
was
off
mute.
I
know
in
these
manifolded
systems
most
likely
a
lot
of
these
are
are
pretty
old,
and
I
know
that
from
experience
I've
with
some
of
these
folks
they've
had
issues
with
roots
and
other
obstructions
that
have
damaged
some
of
these
sewer
systems.
I
think
the
idea
that
they're
going
to
get
new
a
new
sewer
system
to
the
to
the
main
would
have
to
give
that
landowner.
H
Some
assurance
down
the
road
that
they're
not
going
to
have
to
have
people
come
in
and
repair
those
those
situations
on
their
own
property.
I
I
guess
I
I
agree
heath
with
the
idea
that
we
want
to
design
away
from
these
manifold
systems.
I
agree
with
that
and
I
for
one
I
guess
I
would
agree
with
with
option
two
and
I
I
would
hope
that
we
could
give
them
some
time
to
pay
for
this,
and
if
there's
a
way
we
could
get
around
that
10
percent
interest
on
those.
H
D
F
So
we
didn't
know
the
extent
at
the
time
of
the
landowner
meetings
and
that's
why
I
talked
more
to
option
two,
because
I
knew
there
was
some
existing.
The
thing
that
they
mostly
responded
to
were
the
people
that
do
have
problems
were
actually
very
much
in
favor
of
this.
There
are
some
that
already
have
to
remove
their
service.
They
would
have
liked
to
have
done
it
years
ago,
but
knew
this
project
was
coming.
D
Just
a
death
for
you
when
these
were
in,
I
agree
too.
We
got
to
get
the
situation
cleaned
up
when
we
get
the
opportunity
now,
but
when
these
were
put
in,
they
were
put,
it
was
allowable
and
okay
to
do
it.
The
way
it
was
done,
I
mean
it
wouldn't
be
allowed
now,
as
I
understand
it,
under
our
design
standard,
but
it
was
allowable
when
it
was
done.
Is
that
a
fair
statement,
heath.
E
A
D
F
E
And
marcy,
could
you
we
we've
looked
at
those
sidewalk
numbers
recently
too,
just
for
perspective
and
context
here,
you're,
you
know
off
top
your
head,
marcy
to
the
extent
some
of
those
assessments
were
coming
in
at,
I
believe,
with
our
four
dollar
per
square
foot
credit
that
that
blow
has
been
lessened.
Quite
a
bit
is
what
I'm
getting
at.
D
D
D
A
A
A
It
depends
on
how
we
we
wouldn't
necessarily
make
them
clean
it
up
if
there's
multiple
people
using
that,
but
I
mean,
if
they're
in
a
dispute
of
who
owns
it,
and
you
know,
then
that
could
get
sticky.
We
have
had
a
situation
where
a
shared
sewer
was
discovered
and
the
private
main
went
under
a
garage
and
the
city
wanted
to
move
it
out
into
the
alley
while
they
were
while
we
were
nearby
on
another
project
and
the
people
didn't
want
to
pay
for
it,
and
so
it's
still
under
someone's
garage.
A
C
C
Yeah
just
elaborate
on
that
heath
over
the
last.
Oh,
I
don't
know.
22
to
24
years,
we
have
sent
out
well,
we've
identified
another
42
homes
on
similar
type
connections
as
these,
whether
it's
a
private
sewer
running
in
the
boulevard,
and
there
would
be
anywhere
from
maybe
two
or
three
homes
on
that
private
line.