►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - 02-04-2021
Description
Agenda can be found here - https://watertown.civicweb.net/Portal/MeetingInformation.aspx?Org=Cal&Id=312
B
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
B
B
A
F
G
A
B
H
F
H
A
A
F
F
B
A
A
Okay,
so
here's
the
property
it
is
along.
North
lake
drive,
as
you
can
see
here,
and
here
is
the
site
plan
that
is
being
requested.
So
an
application
was
submitted
to
construct
a
proposed
garage
in
addition
to
an
addition
to
the
house
here
and
one
of
the
corners.
Is
it
eight
feet
from
the
side
property
line?
The
zoning
ordinance
does
require
a
nine
foot
setback
in
the
r1
single
family,
residential
district.
B
On
that
note
stacy
regarding
the
the
narrowing,
I
I
see
on
the
street
side
that
this
property
is
96
foot
wide,
which
is
a
pretty
large
width
for
for
some
of
these
lake
lots
where
we
have
historically
had
some
some
substandard
width
sizes.
What
is
what
is
the
lake
side?
It
looks
almost
like
the
house
is
actually
skewed
versus
the
lot
narrowing.
A
B
And
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
have
seen
you
know
in
other
areas
too,
where
homes,
especially
older
homes,
can
be.
You
know,
sitting
slightly
skewed
on
on
the
property,
which
then
presents
a
challenge
when
you're
looking
at
side
yards,
where
you're
trying
to
be
consistent,
and
you
know,
keeping
parallel
walls
while
it's
not
parallel
with
the
property
line,
but
it
is
a
challenge
that
you
know
people
people
have
to
deal
with
in
regards
to
setbacks.
B
I
Okay,
I'm
leanne
swenson,
the
one
that's
here
for
the
variants.
The
owners
adjacent
to
us
is
my
brother
and
sister-in-law,
and
so
they
have
signed
a
letter
here
stating
that
they
are
perfectly
okay
with
what
we're
asking,
but
there
isn't
any
easement
or
anything.
I
guess:
that's
there,
that's
just
how
the
property
line
goes
and
we
share
pretty
much
everything
out
there.
D
D
I
No
they'll
be
able
to
come
in
their
driveway
and
the
what
we
put
out
there.
It
will
not
block
the
driveway,
it's
not
going
to
so
we're
coming
in.
I
guess
we
both
come
in
and
out
of
both
of
those
things,
but
it's
not
going
to
block
if
they
want
to
leave
out
ours
because
they
actually
leave
out
our
driveway
more
because
there's
a
big
sign
and
a
hill
and
it's
kind
of
hard
for
traffic.
Oh
okay,.
D
I
I
guess
I'm
not
sure
what
you're
asking,
because
the
garage
is
going
to
set
forward
from
the
house
so
that
we
can
have
the
right
length.
So
it's
not
the
same
length
as
the
house
and
also
for
the
look
of
coming
in.
We
didn't
want
everything
you
know
just
flat,
so
we'd
be
driving
in,
because
we
have
a
entry
into
the
house
with
a
set
of
steps,
so
we'd
be
basically
driving
in
to
the
steps
to
park.
Our
vehicles.
I
Do
you
see
where
the
20
like,
where
it
says,
proposed
house
that
goes
along
in
the
proposed
garage,
the
middle
dotted
line
there
that
yes,
okay,
the
set
of
steps
runs
where
it
says
number
22,
because
we
come
up
sideways
and
then
we
turn
and
enter
into
the
house.
So
right
where
she's
got
the
pointer
is
the
set
of
steps
so
we'll
be
coming
straight
in
and
straight
on
to
the
steps.
A
I
C
B
C
I
have
one
more
one
more
comment,
one
more
question:
blake
I
see
on
the
on
the
forum
that
was
filled
out
when
it's
asked
to
describe
the
hardship
that
the
variance
was
denied
it
just
says
the
garage
would
be
too
small
for
larger
vehicles.
It
doesn't
there's
nothing
on
this.
That
describes
anything
about
steps,
and
it
also
right
above
that
talks
about
the
definition
of
unnecessary
hardship,
something
that's
substantial
and
of
a
compelling
force,
not
merely
for
reasons
of
convenience.
C
So
I'm
trying
to
figure
that
out,
I
guess
a
garage
being
too
small
for
larger
vehicles.
I
would
consider
a
reason
for
convenience,
but
now
that
the
applicant
has
discussed
the
steps,
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
figure
where
the
steps
that
weren't
initially
discussed
on
this
application,
where
they
come
in
as
far
as
being
an
unnecessary
hardship.
I
I
guess
I
didn't
write
that
on
the
application
either
we're
going
to
have
to
put
some
sort
of
a
smaller
furnace
in
this
garage
to
heat
the
proposed
part
of
the
house
that
sits
towards
the
lake
side
and
so
we're
trying
to
figure
that
out
actually
right
now.
But
if
I,
if
I
had,
the
steps
are
like
four
foot
wide
and
I
I
can't
enter
them
straight
into
the
house.
I
have
to
come
up
sideways
and
then
turn
and
go
into
the
house,
so
I
have
nowhere
to
put
those
steps.
I
D
I
B
E
E
Just
to
throw
something
else
out
there,
I
do
realize
that
the
gibsons
and
swensons
are
related.
There
is
a
14
foot
portion
of
lot
24,
that
is,
that
is
owned
by
the
swensons.
I
mean
it
could
be
possible
that
they
could
ask
their
neighbors
for
another
foot
and
and
not
need
the
various
as
well.
That's
a
possibility,
too
correct.
I
A
I
We've
discussed
that,
but
when
we
talked
to
marty
mack
the
guy
that
did
the
surveying,
he
said
that's
an
awful
lot
of
work
to
go
through
for
just
one
foot,
and
so
he
said
I
would
go
for
the
variants
because
it
seems
to
make
more
sense
for
everybody,
because
otherwise
you're
re-plotting
and
re-lotting
and
doing
all
kinds
of
different
things.
So
we
choose
to
come
this
option.
H
H
I
Yeah
we
have
entry
on
the
lakeside,
but
for
somebody
that's
coming
and
pulling
up
there's
we
won't
be
able
to
even
see
that
somebody's
even
come
or
have
them
walk
all
the
way
around
the
house
or
for
for
us
per
se
to
travel
all
the
way
around
the
house.
You
know
they
would
come
in
most
of
the
time
they
come
in
through
the
house
and
out
the
patio
door.
H
I
guess
I'd
say
my
only
concern
about,
let's
assume
a
variance
is
approved,
establishes
the
encroachment
and
to
adjacent
property
and
forecasting
the
future
of
transfer
the
property
to
non-relative
owners
or
even
relatives.
You
know
don't
get
along
down
the
road
somewhere.
Whatever
the
case
might
be,
creates
a
situation
where
you're
gonna
have
an
encroachment,
that's
gonna
affect
you
know,
second,
order.
Third
order
effects
with
the
you
know,
going
through
financing
with
mortgage
lenders
and
continued
variance.
K
A
B
I
A
B
D
D
B
A
B
J
J
The
and
I'll
read
those
here
it'll
be
for
the
train,
loading
and
unloading,
fertilizer
manufacturing
and
salvage
storage
of
wind
turbine
blades,
which
that
third
one
the
salvage
salvage
storage,
is
actually
what
was
brought
to
our
attention.
And
then
just
looking
at
the
property
and
looking
looking
at
the
history,
we
realized
that
we
were
going
to
bring
forward
the
other
two,
the
train,
loading
and
unloading
and
the
fertilizer
manufacturing
just
because
they
are
conditional
uses
in
the
ordinance
and
just
to
memorialize
it
on
the
entirety
of
the
property
all
at
once.
J
Here
and
but
we
will
act
on
them
separately
and
so
you'll
be
able
to
consider.
If
there's
any
conditions,
the
the
salvage
storage
and
wind
turbine
blades
is
the
newest
use
that
the
property
owners
would
like
to
utilize
and
that
they
will
be
storing
wind
turbine
blades
for
salvage
in
this
general
vicinity.
Here,
and
I
actually,
I
have
a
map
of
that
on
the
agenda
to
kind
of
show.
You
guys
a
better
idea
of
where
some
of
these
uses
are
taking
place.
J
J
So
there's
a
lot
of
uses
going
on
with
this
property.
Another
thing
to
consider
and
that
I
that
I
foresee
the
board
will
be
hearing
from
will
be
the
adjacent
properties.
These
are
residential
properties
within
the
county,
adjacent
to
the
i2
zoning,
designation
of
the
rail
spur
and
the
rail
spur
has
been.
J
B
And
I
I
apologize,
I
grabbed
the
wrong
agenda
and
made
mention
of
item
b
from
the
planning
commission,
but
brandi
you.
You
spoke
to
the
correct
one.
So
thank
you
question
for
you.
In
relation
to
the
the
meeting
that
staff
hosted
with
the
neighborhood
that
took
place
on
january
22nd
is
that
is
that
correct.
J
L
No,
mr
chairman,
yes,
sir
heath
von
impe,
here
just
as
a
point
of
clarity
for
the
sake
of
the
meeting
and
the
structure
of
it,
leave
it
up
to
you,
of
course.
But
would
you
prefer
to
discuss
this
holistically
with
all
three
of
these
conditional
uses
being
discussed
at
one
time
or
proceed
individually
with
each
conditional
use
as
presented
on
the
agenda.
B
I
think
in
situations
like
this,
historically
we've
treated
it
collectively
from
a
public
discussion
standpoint,
even
though
we
may
at
times
take
them
as
separate
actions
from
a
a
planned
commission
or
board
of
adjustment
action
standpoint.
So
we'll
do
that
today,
as
well
with
the
public
hearing,
as
we
probably
have
a
a
few
people
that
want
to
to
speak
today.
I
would
ask
that
we,
you
know,
we
limit
our
comments
to
about
five
minutes
a
piece
and
give
everybody
a
chance
to
speak.
B
B
B
G
G
Looking
at
building
a
fertilizer
plant,
we
had
looked
at
three
sites:
one
site
up
by
the
waverly
exit
off
the
interstate
one
site
over
by
grover
and
the
site
that
we're
on
today
back
in
january,
31st
of
11
about
2
o'clock.
In
the
afternoon
we
met
with
the
mayor
attorney,
stanton
fox
engineer,
thomas
drake,
the
utilities
focus
watertown,
craig
atkins
about
constructing
this
facility,
and
we
actually
had
more
than
just
one
meeting
with
them
in
the
next
couple
of
months.
G
That
spring
we
had
a
a
meeting
with
the
the
adjacent
landowners
out
at
the
ramcota.
It
was
chuck
sweetie
and
myself
that
were
there,
we
discussed
what
was
going
on
with
the
facility
what
we
were
doing
and
they
had
asked
the
the
the
one
neighbor
to
the
northwest
had
asked
for
a
fence
instead
of
trees.
So
we
put
up
a
fence,
the
ones
to
the
southeast
of
us.
G
G
The
soil
bores
came
back
that
we
could
not
put
the
building
on
the
north
side
of
this
facility.
We
had
to
switch
it
to
the
east
side
of
the
facility
okay,
so
we
met
several
times
with
the
city
with
the
mayor
and
tom
drake
and
other
ones
trying
to
put
this
proposal
together.
We
kind
of
leaned
on
them
on
what
we
had
to
do
as
far
as
building
this
facility.
What
permitting
and
everything
else
that
we
needed
to
do?
G
G
G
G
G
D
G
E
E
For
bonnie's
sake
just
again
case
here,
my
understanding
is
at
the
time
it
was
it
was.
It
was
understood
that
the
entire
parcel
was
going
to
be
annexed
into
the
city,
and
if
we
remember
last
month,
we
were
talking
for
some
odd
reason
that
south
part
was
not
so
because
we
knew
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
rail
spur
built
that
we
couldn't
just
stop
the
railsburg
without
making
the
circle
complete
to
the
south.
B
B
Question
question
for
you
related
to
the
use
at
that
time,
so
we're
talking
about
three
conditional
uses
here
in
front
of
the
board
today:
first
being
train
loading
and
unloading,
the
second
being
fertilizer
manufacturing,
both
of
those
uses
were
part
of
the
original
scope
of
this
property.
Is
that
correct.
G
G
Not
what
we
did
when
we
built
this
plant,
we
used
to
have
two
plants
that
were
in
town
and
what
happened
was
we
land
locked
ourselves
to
where
we
can
never
grow
anymore,
so
they
outlived
their
use
the
amount
of
stuff
that
we
were
moving
through?
We
could
not
do
it,
no
more
so
when
we
did
this
one
on
the
south
side
of
our
building
today,
the
dirt
work
is
already
done
to
go
out
another.
G
We
could
actually
go
out
to
180
feet
if
we
want
to
do
to
the
south.
The
dirt
work
underneath
is
already
done.
All
we
got
to
do
is
take
off
the
top
a
little
bit
of
gravel
and
add
storage
and
then
also
on
the
east
side
in
one
of
the
bays
we've
got
it
to
where
we
could
construct
another
tower.
Today
we
are
saying
no
right
now.
We
do
not
have
no
future
of
doing
that.
G
Finally,
in
october
I
called
in
again-
and
I
said,
if
I
don't
hear
back
from
anybody
from
city
hall-
I'm
stating
that
this
project
can
move
forward.
I
still
did
not
get
nobody
to
call
back,
so
I
wait.
It
was
about.
A
month
later
we
had
already
signed
the
contract
with
this
company
martin
bender
they
had.
Somebody
from
the
city
had
called
me
on
and
asked
if
we
were
going
to
go
through
with
the
project-
and
I
said
yes,
we
had
signed
a
contract.
G
He
said
we
have
concerns
with
them
going
through
the
roundabout,
and
I
said
that
was
one
of
the
discussions
that
we
had
with
this
company,
so
that
we
would
not
block
off
the
traffic
and
they
did
not
have
a
concern.
Well
at
that
time,
that
project
fell
through
and
then
martin
bender
brought
this
project
that
bringing
in
the
salvage
blades
and
then
loading
them
out
right
now
we
they
just
loaded
their
first
rail
car
and
doing
a
test
run
to
see
if
this
is
even
going
to
work.
D
G
So
so,
what's
being
done
so
what
this
project
is
is
as
wind
blades,
the
blades
themselves
become
to
where
they
can't
use
them.
No
more,
they
take
them
off.
They
cut
them
into
three
sections,
the
very
tip
of
it.
That's
way
on
the
outside,
that's
shoved
into
the
very
part
that
hooks
right
up
to
the
motor,
and
so
they
bring
in
them
two
pieces
into
our
lot
they're
offloaded
by
a
truck
they
bring
in
by
truck
and
they're
going
to
go
out
by
rail.
G
So
what's
going
on,
is
these
blades
are
going
to
go
to
missouri
and
be
ground
up?
What
I
was
told,
I
don't
know
if
the
guy
from
martin
is
on
with
us
or
not.
I
was
told
that
they're
going
to
use
the
ash
and
the
fiber,
maybe
for
concrete-
I
don't
know
for
sure,
but
that's
what
that's
what
it
is
they're
just
disposing
of
the
blades.
G
There
is
no
no
there's,
no
the
motor,
the
generator
part
is
not
it's
just
the
blades
there's
no
oil
or
nothing
in
the
blades.
All
it
is,
is
just
a
blade
itself.
They're
cut
up,
they
bring
them
in.
They
set
them
down.
They're,
going
to
wait
for
rail
cars
they're,
going
to
pick
them
back
up,
they're,
going
to
set
them
on
the
rail
cars
and
send
them
out.
G
B
F
L
B
G
So
the
ones
that
you
see
up
there
right
now,
the
8
to
4
30,
that's
our
normal
business
hours
and
off
seasons
spring
and
fall.
We
could
we
start
at
7
in
the
spring
7
a.m,
and
it
varies.
We
could
be
done
at
five.
We
could
be
done
at
seven.
We
could
be
done
at
nine.
We
don't
ever
know
our
unloading
when
a
train,
it's
different
between
a
loading
of
a
train
and
an
unloading
of
a
train.
G
I
have
more
flexible
hours,
and
this
is
the
reasoning
why
I
do
because
when
product
is
loaded,
if
it's
loaded,
warm,
let's
say
in
galveston
texas
comes
up
to
watertown
south
dakota.
The
fertilizer
goes
through
a
cooling
down
process
in
that
process.
It
sets
up.
So
that's
why
we
get
more
time
to
unload
our
cars.
G
It's
because
of
that
because
it
can
take
us.
We've
had
a
train
where
it's
taking
us
four
days
to
unload,
because
we
can't
get
it
out
of
the
car,
our
normal.
If
a
train
comes
in
in
decent
shape,
we
usually
start
if
the
train
comes
in
during
the
night,
we
start
at
seven.
We
warm
up
the
equipment
by
quarter
after
seven
we
are
operating
and
what
we
try
to
do
to
be
neighborly
to
everybody.
We
try
to
stop
at
six
o'clock.
G
G
M
Yes,
ma'am,
there
might
be
some
times
where
our
customer
will
request
weekend
work,
but
that
usually
only
happens
if
there's
rain
delays
or
so
forth,
but
for
this
particular
project
where
we're
doing
recycled,
it
should
run
typically
on
schedule
and
there
shouldn't
be
any
weekend
work.
We
did
get
in
a
couple
situations
where
we
had
to
receive
trucks
over
the
weekend
for
receiving
this
this
first
bill
round,
but
that
was
corrected
and
we
pushed
trucks
back
during
the
weekdays.
G
One
thing
the
car,
their
their
cars,
will
only
come
in.
On
monday,
we
get
service
out
of
wilmer
minnesota
on
single
car
units,
not
not
on
unit
trains.
They
come
whenever
they
send
them.
On
single
cars.
We
get
service
to
watertown
on
mondays,
so
they'll
either
bring
them
out
late
monday
afternoon
or
early
tuesday
morning.
That's
when
they
set
up
and
they
give
us
our.
A
M
B
F
F
D
D
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
G
C
B
D
G
M
That's
going
to
vary
on
on
the
customer
supply
of
recycled
blades
to
us,
so
for
this
time
we've
received
85
blades
and
that's
what's
on
the
ground.
Right
now
and
with
like
terry
mentioned,
we
loaded
our
first
rail
car
up
since
this
is
a
test
shipment
outside
of
that.
Once
we
offload
this
rail
car
and
we
get
the
green
light
from
the
customer
to
finish
our
loading
we'd
be
looking
at
approximately
20
25
to
30
rail
cars.
M
M
D
M
M
I
mean-
and
I
can
I
can
kind
of
shine
light.
I
mean
this.
This
business
opportunity
is
completely
new.
It's
at
its
infancy
in
the
wind
energy
market
and
recyclable
market.
Most
these
blades
have
been
buried
underground
in
wyoming,
so
the
oems
are
trying
to
be
proactive
and
find
ways
to
recycle
these
blades.
B
And
in
your
workflow,
with
this,
you've
got
85
blades
on
the
ground,
you're
going
to
cut
these
off
it's
four
per
unit.
So
that's
where
you
came
up
with
that
21
22
units
to
ship
these
out,
but
you're,
not
necessarily
going
to
do
that.
All
at
one
go:
you're
gonna,
fill
a
car
or
two
and
then
ship
that
out
and
fill
another
couple.
M
That
that's
kind
of
where
this
is
a
test
for
us,
because
the
end
receiver
they're
going
to
have
to
learn
how
to
handle
this
commodity
they're
going
to
have
to
you
know
we're
going
to
figure
out
how
much
time
it
takes
them
to
offload
the
rail
car
and
they
only
have
a
four
rail
car
spot.
So
it's
not
like
we
can
send
them.
20
rail
cars
at
once
and
they'll
be
able
to
manage
it.
So
you
know
we're
going
to
have
to
be
able
to
balance
it
with
what
the
offloading
capabilities
can
handle.
G
D
G
M
That
that's
correct!
We
don't
want
them
on
the
ground
any
longer
than
we
have
to,
because
it
cost
us
money,
so
we
have
an
incentive
to
get
those
blades
out
of
there.
The
only
reason
that
these
blades
are
on
the
ground
for
the
time
being
that
we've
had
them
this.
This
long
is
because
we
have
to
test
this
real
car,
since
this
is
the
first
time
this
particular
blade
and
load
have
moved
across
to
anywhere
in
north
america.
M
B
B
K
B
F
J
J
J
J
A
J
J
K
K
K
The
annexation
into
the
city
that
was
previously
done
of
the
northern
half
was
21
march
of
2011,
so
that
bottom
part
was
never
purchased.
At
the
same
time
is
the
reason
I
have
that
in
there
and
our
previous
annexation
meetings,
they
have
said
that
it
was
all
purchased
at
one
time
that
is
partially
correct.
K
K
F
K
E
J
Right
and
that's
what
I
was
this
is
brandy.
I
was
going
to
state
that
as
well,
that
that
is
typical
procedure
that
the
res
the
annexation
resolution
always
states.
That-
and
I
did
I
did
talk
with
evan
about
that
earlier
and
then
how
there's
a
subsequent
ordinance
that
implements
the
zoning.
So
it's
it
is
done
hand
in
hand,
but
that
resolution
that
he
has
here
in
this
packet.
That
is
why
it
states
that
that
there's,
no
zoning
so.
K
If
we
go
to
the
next
page,
the
pre,
the
the
land
owner
had
stated
that
they
did
send
a
email
out
chs
and
that
the
landowners
were
invited
to
a
meet
and
greet.
How
can
we
help
you?
We
we
did
have
a
sit
down,
not
all
neighbors
were
there,
but
we
did
have
a
sit
down
with
chuck
sweetie
back
in
2011,
and
he
stated
at
that
time.
Cars
would
never
sit
long
periods
of
time.
K
K
L
K
K
K
I
also
went
to
the
city
hall
in
watertown
to
see
if
there
were
any
additional
building
permits
or
whatnot
on
partial
3
that
dirt
work
is
currently
being
done
on.
As
of
september.
29Th,
there
were
none.
Partial
3
is
not
annexed
into
the
city.
As
of
the
rest
of
your
property,
it
seems
to
me
there's
something
not
being
disclosed
to
all
the
adjacent
landowners
that
you
say,
you're
trying
to
be
a
good
neighbor
to,
and
then
I
asked
him
in
this
email.
K
K
Charlie
yep
right
there,
the
first
bullet
there,
it
says
all
required.
Improvements
shall
be
installed
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
engineer
within
five
years
of
the
day
of
the
instrument
and
with
the
registered
deeds.
Developer,
acknowledges
and
degrees
that
all
terms
and
conditions
contained
herein
shall
remain
a
continuing
obligation
until
satisfaction
and
completion.
K
Towards
the
bottom,
it
says
it
is
understood
by
the
developer
that
the
city's
primary
consideration
for
granting
approval
of
the
subdivision,
plaid
on
the
huron
described
property
immediately
install
aggregate
base,
engrading
concrete,
curb
and
gutter
binomials
pavement
sidewalk,
sanitary
sewer
and
services
water
services.
Now
in
here
it
also
states
that
some
of
these,
like
sidewalks
walking
paths
and
stuff
are,
are
not
viable
because
of
where
it's
located.
K
and
to
go
along
with
the
previous
meetings
that
we've
had
with
chs
here
at
the
city
council,
they
said
that
they
do
not
own
the
railroad
tracks
and
they
have
no
control,
but
there
is
actually
no
right
of
way
for
either
great
northern's,
railroad,
company
or
bnsf,
so
they
do
actually
own
the
whole
track.
They
control
it.
Now
they
may
not
control
the
time
the
train
comes
in,
but
they
actually
control
the
track
itself.
There's
no
right
of
way.
K
K
K
K
K
K
J
We
so
we
recently
amended
that
ordinance
and
I'll
have
to
check
at
what
application
we
do
need
to
update
some
of
the
things
on
our
website,
but
definitely
the
ordinance
would
be
what
would
stand
our
our
applications.
They
should
be
consistent,
yes,
but
if
that
has
not
been
changed,
thank
you
for
bringing
that
to
our
attention
and
we'll
make
sure
to
get
that
noted.
B
K
A
good
catch,
mr
brantley,
thank
you
so
the
actual
next
page,
the
train
log,
so
the
city,
the
you
board,
members
actually
asked
us
last
time,
we're
here
to
keep
a
train
log
since
the
our
last
meeting
on
seven
january,
twenty
one
so
they're.
Actually,
if
you,
if
you
look
at
this
list,
there
actually
has
been
seven
trains.
Since
our
last
meeting
chs
said
that
there
would
not
be
any
trains
in
the
next
couple
weeks,
there's
actually
one
the
very
next
day
at
2am.
K
D
K
K
D
K
So
what
I've
learned
about
the
trains
just
looking
at
stuff
and
and
trying
to
figure
things
out
what
I've
learned
about
the
trains?
They
are
correct.
They
have
no
control
when
the
train
comes
in
or
when
it
leaves
they
do
all.
They
do
ultimately
have
24
hours
to
unload
once
they
sign
over
the
engine
if
they
get
loaded
in
10
hours
or
less,
they
get
an
incentive
a
bonus.
K
They
they
did
not
want
to
split
cars
like
it
currently
was
in
in
city
limits
where
it
currently
is
on
212
and
highway
20.,
and
just
one
thing
to
point
out
on
this
train
log
2,
not
since
our
last
meeting,
but
previously
in
the
past.
Some
of
the
neighbors
have
actually
called
the
sheriff
to
have
that
engine
of
the
train
moved
to
a
different
location,
because
it's
it's
loud,
it's
it
needed
to
be
moved.
K
So
board
member
oletsky,
you
asked
us
to
contact
or
look
into
those
houses
along
fourth
avenue
along
the
river.
So
I
actually,
I
do
know
a
gentleman
that
does
live
there,
he's
in
the
military
retired,
but
I
spoke
with
him
and
I
actually
took
a
picture.
The
first
one
on
the
left
is
the
rail
spur
along
4th
avenue
it's
empty,
because
all
the
train
cars
are
mainly
out
by
us.
Now
I
mean:
are
there
a
few
cars
here
and
there?
K
K
K
And
then
the
bottom
right
picture
is
actually
a
picture
of
a
hundred
plus
cars
on
a
rail
loop.
So
when
that,
when
that
hundred
plus
car
train
comes
in
on
that
rail
spur,
it
almost
takes
up
that
whole
loop,
there's
probably
less
than
a
quarter
of
that
loop.
That
does
not
have
a
car
sitting
on
it.
That's
the
length
of
the
the
train
just
perspective,
so
the
next
page,
the
top
left
is
the
egg
works
and
cha
chs
sign.
K
K
K
Correct
so
these
are-
and
we
didn't-
I
didn't
put
them
on
here.
You
know
as
priorities.
I
just
listed
them
out.
There's
no
priority
on
this,
so
number
one
I
mean
that
we
really
talked
about
was
loading
unloading
hours
and
one
thing
that
we
thought
as
adjacent
landowners
7
to
10
7
am
to
10
pm.
Now,
if
a
train
comes
in
at
2am
in
the
morning,
let
it
sit
there
till
7am,
don't
start
unloading
on
unloading
or
loading
it
until
7am.
K
Second,
one
increase
the
noise
control
buffer
additional
trees,
either
spruce
or
evergreen.
It's
something
that's
green
and
year-round,
so
they
did
state
that
we
requested
three
rows
of
trees
be
planted
earlier
back
in
2011.
We
did
request
a
buffer,
but
we
didn't
specify
how
many
rows
and
what?
But
it's
right
now
in
the
wintertime
there's
no
leaves
there's
nothing.
K
K
Another
number
four
sound
barriers
constructed
around
the
bean
dryers.
So
when
them
bean
dryers
are
running,
it
sounds
like
it's
right
outside
your
door,
I
mean
and
we're
on
the
east
side
and
they're
on
the
west
side.
I
can't
imagine
the
people
right
to
the
north
of
those
bean
dryers
and
plans
have
it
that
they're
going
to
put
up
more
bins
this
summer,
if
possible.
K
K
J
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
that
tax
deduction
point
and
I
was
able
to
talk
to
somebody
at
the
director
of
equalization's
office
and
I
know
that
evan
has
two
and
they
there
is
a
process
for
that
and
obviously
it's
nothing.
The
city
itself
can't
really
doesn't
have
any
control
on
that.
So
that
would
be
a
matter
to
take
up
with
the
director
of
equalization
and
then
ultimately,
it
would
go
to
the
township
board
for
their
consideration.
K
D
D
D
F
K
F
K
D
H
K
D
F
L
Perhaps
some
of
the
larger
cities
across
the
country
have
actual
design
standards
for
something
like
that
that
they
deal
with
a
lot
more
frequently
and
you'll
see
sound
deadening
walls
built
along
interstates
in
the
twin
cities,
for
example,
and
things
of
that
nature.
They
may
have
some
some
design
criteria
that
they
utilize.
B
E
I
believe,
because
of
the
quantities
of
the
materials
that
the
crs
has
there,
many
of
those
things
are
probably
required.
Sarah
reporting,
therefore
they
they
are
part
of
reporting
requirements.
With
the
south
code
office
of
emergency
management,
the
south
dakota
kyanton
county,
happens
to
have
a
hazardous
materials
plan
which
does
have
a
response
plan
for
first
responders
to
come
to
places
like
that.
In
the
event,
there
was
a
spill
and.
E
K
G
G
We
got
the
earth
berm
dike
with
the
rubberized
and
stuff
the
state
said
we
wouldn't
had
to
went
that
far,
but
we
did
the
ones
that
are
alongside
the
small
building
the
same
thing:
they're
all
in
certified
by
the
state
and
what
we
did
over
along
the
road
of
ag
works
up
over
go
up
a
little
bit
more
okay
down
right
right.
There
go
down
a
little
bit
nope.
The
other
way
right
up
up
up
up,
keep
going
a
little
more
a
little
more
a
little
more
right.
G
There
we
actually
put
in
the
shutoffs
so
that
if
something
would
start
to
leak,
we
can
shut
the
we
can
shut
them
off
so
that
the
water
would
so
that
the
stuff
would
never
reach
pelican
lake.
We
wouldn't
have
done
that,
but
we
did
it
because
we
have
the
same
concern
as
everybody
else
does.
We
do
not
want
to
ruin
the
environment.
G
L
Yeah,
I
guess
the
for
a
synopsis
of
mr
brandley's
question
there.
The
city
is
involved
to
I'd,
say
a
small
extent
to
what
fire
marshal
primus
has
chimed
into.
We
otherwise
rely
on
the
state
agencies
that
oversee
these
spill
prevention
measures
and
emergency
response
actions
and
plans
that
the
state
requires.
We
let
them
be
the
big
brother
agency,
if
you
will
that
oversees
and
administers
those
regulations.
It
sounds
like
mr
nelson
has
touched
on
how
they
do
have
those
in
place
with
the
state
appropriately.
F
L
That's
a
good
question,
mr
chairman.
I
I
wouldn't
want
to
speak
to
how
the
city's
handled
that
in
the
past,
I
can
speak
to
today's
processes
that
we've
been
administering
since
last
two
and
a
half
years
anyway.
Where
the
time
lapse,
I
guess
hasn't
been
a
concern
and
obviously
to
the
fullest
extent
possible.
We
as
staff,
try
to
prevent
that
from
happening.
B
Understood-
and
I
appreciate
you,
you
know
speaking
to
the
the
way
that
we're
taking
things
forward
as
well.
You
know
because,
because
it's
important
that
well,
we
do
recognize
that
we
may
have
had
you
know
issues
in
in
the
past.
That's
not
always
to
say
that
they're
going
to
continue
into
the
future
right.
E
B
E
I
guess
my
my
basic
question
is:
I
understand
the
history
of
what's
happened
on
the
property
and
I
understand
the
neighbors
concerns
and
I
was
curious.
Have
you
been
made
aware
of
these
suggested
recommendations
from
the
neighborhood
prior
to
this
meeting,
or
was
this
the
first
time
that
you
experienced
this
information.
G
G
E
F
F
F
E
E
Seeing
that
I
just
want
to
provide
my
perspective,
the
way
I
see
it
is
that
we
have
property.
That's
been
annexed
annexed
in
stages.
What
have
you
into
this
city?
It's
been.
It's
been
zoned
i2.
The
city
has
issued
permits
to
construct
the
the
rail
spur
and
two
of
the
existing
uses.
I
I
think
I
want
to
comment
that
I
don't
think
any
of
the
existing
staff
was
part
of
any
one
of
those
two
things,
I'm
not
sure
any
of
them.
E
Any
of
you
were
working
for
the
city
at
the
time,
and
I
also
realized
that
there
was
no
conditional
use
permit
issued
in
the
past.
So
I
think
at
this
point
we
are.
We
are
obligated
to
follow
our
ordinance
in
our
ordinance
stipulates
in
a
situation
like
this.
We
have
to
follow
our
cup
process,
which
is
a
notice,
a
hearing,
and
then
we
issue
those
permits
that
are
allowed
potentially
subject
to
additional
conditions,
and-
and
I
want
to
be
very
emphatic
on
potentially.
E
There
were
some
conditions
that
were
applied
at
the
time
of
the
annexation.
They
seemed
to
be
have
complied
with
that
were
suggested.
You
know
some,
so
what
I'm
really
struggling
with
today
is
you
know
the
need
to
attach
additional
conditions.
You
know
maybe
to
the
wind
blades,
because
that's
something
new.
B
Thank
you,
mr
case,
and,
and
we
will
take
them
each
individually.
So
we
appreciate
that
and
and
your
comments
you
know,
I'm
generally
in
agreeance
with
you
and,
and
it
is
a
struggle
based
upon
the
you
know,
the
use
that
we've
had
on
the
property
and
the
history
of
the
property
on
when
we
would
potentially
attach
additional
conditions
and,
like
you
said,
I
think
the
one
exception
to
this
may
be
the
the
new
use
that
we're
seeing
with
the
the
blades,
but
the
rest
of
the
uses
have
in
effect
been.
B
J
E
F
B
E
E
E
L
E
E
B
J
And
now
just
for
clarity,
so
this
is
for
and
it's
not
specifically
for
chs
or
ag
works.
It
is
on
the
property.
So
it
is.
This
todd's
motion
is
for
the
train,
loading
and
unloading
and
the
fertilizer
manufacturing
conditional
uses
and
that
he's
making
a
motion
to
approve
those
with
no
conditions,
and
then
we
will
still
act
on
the
salvage
storage
of
wind
wind
turbine
blades.
K
E
Then,
mr
chair,
as
the
maker
of
the
motion,
I
would
request
that
if
we
do
attach
conditions
that
we
vote
on
the
conditions
individually,
so
that
when
we
handle
the
the
final
motion
as
amended,
it's
going
to
be
very
specific
and
it
might
not
be
just
a
kitchen
sink
full
of
conditions.
I
want
those
conditions
voted
on
individually.
B
D
G
F
L
E
C
E
J
B
F
C
Protecting
those
residential
properties-
and
the
second
thing
I
wanted
to
say,
is
that
perhaps
some
of
you
also
listened
to
the
city
council
meeting
on
monday
night,
when
they
annexed
and
zoned
this
property
and
several
council
people
were
pretty
concerned
about
the
protecting
the
residents
in
that
area,
and
I
wrote
down
three
comments
that
three
different
council
people
said.
One
said
they
hoped
that
the
board
of
adjustment
would
give
this
deliberate
thought.
C
C
B
C
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
attach
some
conditions:
timing,
wise
about
the
loading
and
unloading
of
those
trains
that
apparently,
since
we
had
our
last
meeting,
how
many
seven
or
eight
trains
have
appeared
in
that
short
time
period
and
several
of
them
were
arriving
in
the
middle
of
the
night.
I'm
not
a
railroad
person.
C
I
I
I
feel
for
the
property
owners,
the
business
people
and
the
residents
there's
been
certainly
some
missteps
and
errors
in
the
whole
way
this
was
handled
throughout
the
years.
I
don't
believe
the
property
owners
should
have
to
listen
to
a
train
engine
and
unloading
a
train
at
two
in
the
morning,
so
I
would.
C
A
Mr
chair,
this
is
stacy.
I
just
wanted
to
point
something
out
for
the
board's
consideration.
One
of
the
things
we've
thought
a
lot
about
this
and
looking
back,
it's
very
difficult
to
know
how
this
ordinance
was
interpreted
back
at
the
time
with
the
information
that
the
community
leaders
and
the
city
officials
had
so
it
could
have
been
possible
back
then
that
some
of
these
uses
were
interpreted
as
permitted
uses
rather
than
conditional
uses.
A
C
C
I
am
asking
for
some
input
put
first
todd
on
what
someone
might
consider
to
be
an
appropriate
time
frame
that
might
satisfy
the
landowners
and
not
be
too
restrictive
for
the
for
the
business
I'm
just
asking
for
people.
If
they
have
some
information,
aren't
we
aren't
we
into
a
discussion
period
now
on
your
motion,
tag.
E
C
D
C
C
E
I
don't
argue,
I'm
not
going
to
argue
with
on
that
diana.
I
think
it's
very
important,
but
I
think
some
of
this
discussion
should
have
happened
10
years
ago
when
the
railroad
was
allowed
to
be
constructed
and
when
the
building
permits
were
issued
to
the
youths
that
have
been
operating
for
years.
At
this
point
in
time.
E
You
know,
if
you
take
a
look
at
yes,
we
are
to.
We
are
to
protect
residential
uses,
but
generally
our
rules
only
apply
to
those
uses
within
this
within
the
boundaries
of
the
city
limits
and
as
the
city
grows,
we
are
going
to
be
encroaching
other
residential
uses,
other
commercial
other
agricultural
uses
that
are
going
to
be
incompatible
with
the
city's
growth
patterns.
E
We,
as
the
community,
have
made
the
determination
ten
years
ago
or
more
that
this
is
a
place
that
we
wanted
to
see
a
rail
spur,
because
a
rail
spur
was
important
to
the
city
of
watertown
at
that
time,
to
promote
this
sort
of
economic
development
and
I'm
not
trying
to
be
callous
to
the
individuals
that
are
living
out
there
in
the
community.
But
the
city
had
made
a
path
10
years
ago
and
and
and
the
individuals
that
are
before
us
today
asking
for
permission
for
something
that
they
believe
they've
already
received.
E
I
find
it
hard
to
go
back
and
say
we're
changing
the
game
on
them.
If
we
want
to
have
this
discussion
on
the
wind
blades,
I'm
I'm
I'll
be
with
you
100
on
that,
but
I
think
there's.
I
think
I
think
there's
been
some
indication
by
the
municipality
that
we
are
okay
with
this
particular
use
being
located
at
this
particular
location.
C
C
C
E
C
I
think
it's
unfortunate
that,
because
the
city
failed
to
act
appropriately,
that
these
residential
land
owners
are
the
ones
that
bear
the
brunt
of
someone's
oversight.
It
certainly
doesn't
appear
to
be
them
if
they
hadn't
come
forward
with
questions
about
these
blades
right
now,
we
still
wouldn't
be
having
this
discussion,
because
we
still
wouldn't
know.
K
C
No,
I
I
didn't
say
you
did
todd,
I'm
simply
saying
I
don't
believe
it
was
their
fault,
and
we
have
here
two
businesses
that
are
multi-million
dollar
businesses,
who
obviously,
I
would
think,
have
attorneys
at
their
disposal
who
should
be
able
to
read
city
ordinances
and
know
what's
happening.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
dropped
the
ball.
I
just
don't
personally
believe
the
landowners
should
take
the
full
brunt
of
that.
I
would
like
to
find
a
way
to
cut
them
a
little
bit
of
a
deal.
B
B
J
C
F
D
It's
a
tough
one,
because
I
have
other
things
that
I
want
to
do
too.
I
wish
we
could
all
do
them
separate.
You
know
together,
there's
another
one
that
I
would
like
to
bring
out
too.
Maybe
this
might
help
with
the
timing
frame,
because
I
would
like
to
put
bring
one
forward
where
they
have
to
do
a
berm
and
trees
where
they
have
that
crop
lamp
that
goes
right
behind
their
homes,
and
I
think
that
would
help
a
lot
with
the
noise
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
because,
like
one
of
the
owners
was.
N
D
B
B
D
Okay,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
do
a
berm
on
the
side,
a
berm
and
trees
that
they
were
talking
about
on
the
side
that
the
homeowner
said
that
you
know
there's
some
of
their
solutions,
and
I
thought
the
berm
that
earth
berm
with
trees
would
really
take
care
of
a
lot
of
that
problem,
because
you
can
tell
by
when
you
go
into
big
cities,
and
you
look
at
those
berms.
They
have
to
do
something,
they
have
to
really
work
for
them.
D
B
A
N
For
clarity
and
convenience
and
bonnie,
I
I
appreciate
your
comments
and
I
don't
necessarily
disagree
with
them,
but
let's
I
think
there
was
eight
different
conditions.
One
of
them
was
the
tax
deduction
which
we
can't
impact
at
all,
but
but
why
don't
we
take
the
remaining
six
conditions
and
then
we'll
we
make
a
motion
on
them.
We
second
the
motion.
If,
if
there's
somebody
that's
willing
to
second
it,
then
we
have
the
discussion
as
opposed
to
having
the
discussion
on
the
front
end.
D
N
D
H
Yeah
so,
instead
of
specifying
the
solution
in
terms
of
the
noise
mitigation-
and
I
would
support
a
measure-
you
know
a
condition
that
would
a
lot-
you
know
allow
some
mitigation
noise
mitigation
for
the
residential
areas
there,
but
we're
getting
beyond
you
know
at
a
board
meeting
you're
looking
at
the
feasibility
or
getting
beyond
feasibility
of
what
an
appropriate
solution
is
whether
or
not
a
berm
can
even
fit
in
the
space
between
the
rail
and
the
the
existing
road
or
tree
line
between
the
property
and
the
industrial
area
there.
So
I
don't.
E
E
C
H
F
J
J
D
B
N
J
N
I
guess
I'd
be
I
I
could
make
the
motion
for
both
or
we
could
do
it
one
at
a
time
and
then
see
what
the
board's
taste
is.
I
I'm
inclined
to
trees
or
fence
or
both,
and
I
would
say,
no
less
than
three
rows
of
coniferous:
trees,
coniferous
being
evergreen
type
trees,
as
opposed
to
deciduous,
which
would
be
leaf
bearing
trees.
B
N
I'd
make
a
motion
chair
I'd,
make
a
motion
for
the
area
highlighted
on
the
gs
which
would
be
in
the
southeastern
quadrant
of
the
property
bordering
the
residential
properties,
as
well
as
the
tree
road
to
the
south
of
the
property
that
there
be
a
coniferous
trees
planted.
No
more
than
excuse
me,
no
less
than
three
rows
of
coniferous
trees
planted
as
a
sound
barrier
trying
to
think
about
with
you
know
no
more
than
20
feet
apart
from
each
other.
N
H
So
if
I
may,
this
is
a
mr
spider.
Just
a
quick
question
from
the
scholar,
so
there
really
literally,
is
only
like
about
150
feet
between
the
tree
line
assistant
tree
line
there
and
the
the
rail
and
to
specify
the
solution
amongst
the
board.
Right
now
may
or
may
not
deliver
the
noise
mitigation
without
some
kind
of
study
or
analysis
done.
H
N
And
I
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
respectfully
disagree,
because
I
think
we
have
to
put
specific
conditions
on
this,
but
maybe
I'm
wrong.
I
mean
that's
part
of
the
challenge
of
being
on
this
board.
When
we
talk
about
conditional
use,
maybe
maybe
we
can
simply
put
a
decibel
condition
on
it,
which
in
that
case
I'd
be
open
to
that.
You
know.
E
E
E
E
And
concur
with
this
yeah
the
idea
of
doing
a
sound
study,
a
sound
barrier
study
where
the
city
has
no
noise
standards
throughout
industrial
and
residential
properties,
where
we're
basically
legislating
things
without
going
through
a
formal
legislative
process.
People
complain
all
the
time
about
judges
being
advocates
and
and
making
laws
that,
while
they're
doing
you
know
judicial
actions
and-
and
I
don't
want
to
be
in
that
position
where
we
are
creating
potential
legislation
on
an
individual
administrative
app.
D
C
B
D
B
A
E
N
F
J
F
J
B
D
B
G
J
D
D
E
N
I
just
want
to
be
real
deliberate
with
our
actions
here
again:
tax
deductions.
We
don't
have
any
control
over
seven
and
eight
were
rodent
control
measures
and
we
control.
I
believe
that
once
this
is
brought
into
the
city,
the
city
is
responsible.
I
mean
we
have
ordinances
that
cover
that
right.
We
don't
need
to
do
additional
conditional
uses
currently
so.
H
N
B
J
J
F
E
J
H
J
B
E
Case
I
would
make
a
motion
for
number
five.
Both
applicants
have
stated
that
they
would
place
their
trains
on
to
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property.
They
said
that
that
would
not
be
objectionable
to
them,
so
I
would
make
a
motion
that
they
would
be
required
to
place
the
train
engines
on
the
north
end
of
the
railroad.
F
E
J
F
J
H
J
F
E
F
E
E
E
E
Decimal
reasons
doesn't
apply
in
the
i2
zone,
as
just
recently
was
pointed
out
and
two
I
don't
know
what
it
is
that
you're
asking
this
applicant
to
do,
and
and
because
of
that,
if
we
can't
be
any
more
direct
and
succinct
of
what
we're
expecting
out
of
the
applicant,
I
don't
know
how
we
can
apply
condition.
That's
nebulous.
E
E
H
Yeah,
I
can
respect
the
the
opinions
regarding
the
emotion
and
the
yeah.
The
burden
is
going
to
place
on
the
the
business
owner
and
fair
point
that
the
properties
affected
are
outside
of
the
city.
Ordinance.
You
know
control
just.
I
think
it's
a
reasonable
expectation
to
grant
them.
You
know
some
kind
of
mitigation
and
I
would
point
to
that
ordinance
as
a
benchmark,
and
my
only
concern
would
be
that
specifying
a
berm
may
be
infeasible
having
you
know
dealt
with
earthenworks
throughout
my
career.
H
It
just
may
not
be
enough
space
and
for
to
reach
the
height
needed
to
deliver
the
effect
that
it
was
desired.
So
it
was
more
in
response
to
that
trying
to
specify
to
the
business
owner
how
they
will
in
place.
Mitigations
concrete
wall,
it
is
set
to
height,
may
be
a
much
more
feasible
and
acceptable
solution
to
give
mitigation
to
the
land
owners.
But
if
they
come,
you
know
the
board
wants
to
take
the
position
that
they
don't
have
any
recourse,
because
they're
outside
the
city
and
the
ordinance
doesn't
apply
it.
I
think.
B
It's,
I
guess.
The
other
aspect
that
todd
alluded
to
here
is
is
the
the
use
of
the
decibel
figure
in
the
first
place
and
how
how
you
can
determine
what
that
standard
is
going
to
be
right.
So
if
we
just
say
that
it's
going
to
reduce
it
to
an
acceptable
level,
what
is
that
acceptable
level
you
know?
Are
we
talking
about?
Are
we
going
to
reduce
it
by
a
set
amount?
You
know
by
20
decibels
at
the
property
line,
something
more
specific
and
concrete.
H
That
would
be
what
they
would
experience
in
the
residential
area
or,
if
the
board
so
chooses,
they
can
choose
another
reasonable
decimal
level,
say
76,
you
know
a
normal
driving
decibel
in
a
vehicle
or
something
that,
but
now
we're
getting
beyond.
You
know
the
scope
of
some
of
the
ordinance
and
again
we're
getting
into
more
of
an
engineering
and
a
science
study
area.
I
was
just
concerned
about
specifying
x,
number
of
trees
or
x
number
earth
and
work
may
put
a
burden
on
the
the
business
owner.
It's
not
feasible.
F
N
Cohen,
here
again,
I
would
be
willing
to
entertain
and
vote
in
favor
of
something
quote:
mitigation
measures,
but
but
only
in
the
terms
of
screening
and
buffering
type
stuff,
that's
within
the
ordinance-
and,
I
think,
specifically,
coniferous
trees.
I
I
don't
know
about
connect,
you
know
concrete
barrier,
but
I
think,
for
the
reasons
we've
discussed
the
the
feasibility
issues
with
the
berm.
N
You
know
trees
relatively
inexpensive,
relatively
easy
to
plant.
I
understand
that
not
free
but
relatively
easy
quick
to
do.
I
understand
that
there's
you
know
they
take
a
time
to
grow,
but
again.
That
was
why
I
made
that
initial
motion.
Outside
of
that.
I
don't
really
feel
comfortable,
putting
any
other
additional
conditions
even
related
to
sound,
so
I'd
be
willing
to
do
a
fence,
a
barrier
and
or
trees
and
with
a
preference,
strong
preference
for
coniferous
trees.
E
F
B
E
E
J
H
B
F
J
E
J
F
J
B
E
N
N
C
H
Absolutely
yeah
thanks,
so
the
emotion
is
that
a
noise
mitigation
being
placed
based
on
the
feasibility
of
a
study
to
reduce
the
decimal
levels
to
the
residential
area
to
a
specified
level,
and
I
would
have
meant
that
to
say:
let's
take
our
cue
from
the
established
ordinances,
that
you
know
that
specified
level
will
be
65
decibels.
So
it
wouldn't
be
to
predetermine
what
the
noise
mitigation
solution
was.
J
J
H
J
F
A
J
F
J
F
J
B
J
N
A
A
E
F
E
I'm
not
sure
how
to
go
about
making
this
motion,
but
I
would
I
would
like
the
applicant
to
maybe
suggest
something
that
they
would
do
on
their
behalf
to
mitigate
which
doesn't
have
a
long,
doesn't
impact
their
ability
to
use
their
land
and
maybe
put
them
in
the
driver's
seat
and
see
what
they
have
to
offer
and
if
and
if.
If
it
meant
a
motion
to
postpone
action
on
that
to
give
them
an
opportunity
to
do
that
and
then
come
back.
B
A
B
E
B
And
I
appreciate
the
intention
of
mr
spears
proposal
with
the
sound
mitigation
and
not
necessarily
specifying
exactly
what
the
solution
is.
I
can
understand
that
and-
and
I
think
your
your
point,
mr
case
in
regards
to
taking
some
time
and
potentially
deferring
this
until
that
solution
can
be
evaluated
and
something
proposed.