![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NZS8l4Ox46U/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting 7/8/21
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting 7/8/21
A
B
A
A
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Brandi
moving
on
item
three
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
the
june
24th
2021
meeting.
A
Yes,
motion
carries
item
4
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
open
public
comments
period
we'll
have
that
later
on
in
the
meeting?
If
you'd
like
to
speak
on
something,
that's
not
on
the
agenda
today,
you
can
go
ahead
and
sign
up
there
in
the
room
or
or
notated
on
the
the
teams.
Well,
we'll
ask
for
that
in
a
minute.
C
All
right,
so
this
one
is
a
combination.
We
have
a
conditional
use
and
a
variance
request
for
blue
tied
car
wash,
and
this
the
owner
is
jeremy
christopherson
with
rsa
architecture
and
design
and
the
property
that
they're
looking
at
incorporating
this
use
on
is
within
east
park's
second
edition,
and
in
the
recent
past
we
just
hadn't.
We
had
another
car
wash
conditional
use
again
in
the
c3
highway
commercial
district.
That
is
what
this
property
is
zoned,
and
so
it
incorporates
all
of
lot
2
and
then
the
east.
C
The
east
79.86
feet
of
lot
one
black
one
of
east
park.
Second,
so
if
you
can
see
on
this
map
here
that
portion
of
lot
one
so
that
lot,
one
two
three
and
four
within
east
park,
second
edition,
so
that
is
the
this
property-
is
also
within
the
gateway
overlay
district,
which
brings
us
to
the
variance
request.
C
So
if
we
pull
up
the
site
plan
that
is
being
proposed,
you'll
see
that
and
we've
also
dealt
with
this
in
2019
when
holiday
inn
express
came
forward,
they
had
to
ask
for
a
variance
for
the
transitional
yards
in
the
gateway
overlay
district.
We
require
a
10
foot,
transitional
yard,
that
is
to
be
not
encroached
upon
and
just
left
as
grass
area,
so
that
is
when
it's
on
the
rear
and
the
side
yard
setbacks.
C
So
if
you
can
see
here,
they're
showing
where
that
10
feet
is
for
the
for
those
transitional
yards
and
then
to
reflect
on
the
discussion
that
plan
commission
had
in
2019
was
that
we
wanted
to
revisit
those
transitional
yards
because
of
how
it
has
impacted
people's
people's
designs
and
that,
if
they're,
really,
if
it's
really
necessary,
you
know
they
were
implemented.
It's
it's
really
for
aesthetics,
but
we
also
have
additional
or
greater
aesthetic
requirements
with
that
gateway
overlay
district
that
they
have
to
do.
C
So
when
we
looked
at
that
application,
we
ended
up
reducing
that
transitional
yard
from
five
feet
to
ten
ten
feet
to
five
feet,
and
we
were
wanting
to
look
at
an
ordinance
amendment
so
that
we
didn't
have
this
this
type
of
application
again.
So
what
you
can
see
here
with
tidal
wave
and
also
in
their
application,
they
submitted
a
nice
description
of
what
their
hardships
are.
C
If
you
had
a
chance
to
read
that-
and
the
applicant
is
online
too-
and
I'll
kind
of
just
give
an
overview
and
then
if
you
guys
have
additional
questions,
I'm
sure
that
he
would
be
able
to
answer.
But
you
can
see
here
that
they
there's
a
10
foot
utility
easement
along
the
entire
north
property
line
and
then
that
there
are
two
fronts
along
eighth
avenue,
south
and
highway
212
with
this
property.
And
then
the
flood
plain
covers
the
southern
portion
of
this
property,
which
did
restrict
the
buildable
area
that
they
had.
C
B
B
D
B
B
C
Would
only
be
required
if
the
building
is
within
the
floodplain,
which
it
is
not,
and
I'm
trying
to
get
that
that
layer
to
work
they
that
would
have
to
be
either
built
up
or
wet
flood
proofed
and
because
it
is
a
car
wash,
it
probably
will
be
built
of
wet
floodproof
materials.
So
they
could
do
it
that
way
with
it
being
commercial
residential
doesn't
get
that
option
and
the
parking
areas,
though,
could
be
within
the
floodplain,
because
we're
not
worried
about
the
we're.
Just
we're
worried
about
structures.
B
C
Yeah
and
because
there
there
is
this
drainage
ditch,
I
don't
know
why
this
is
not
showing,
but
it's
really
within
this
drainage
ditch
is
where
the
floodplain
is.
B
C
B
D
Yes,
okay,
good!
We,
the
applicant,
does
know
that
we
will
require
an
admin
plat
to
actually
create
a
parcel
there.
D
C
No,
these
areas
yeah,
no,
those
are
just
low,
and
so
it's
just
within
the
floodplain
and
actually
what
what
I'll
do
that.
My
presentation
is
for
the
most
part
concluded.
So
if
blake,
if
you
want
to
open
the
public
hearing
and
and
have
discussion.
E
Okay,
wonderful,
my
name
is
jeremy
christopherson,
I'm
representing
the
owner,
I'm
with
rsa,
and
thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening.
Just
one
thing
I
wanted
to
touch
on
or
a
couple
points
we
are
trying
to
stay
out
of
the
flood
plain
if
at
all
possible
and
the
site
plan
that
we
submitted
is
with
the
intention
that
the
curb
line
that
we're
showing
for
the
stacking
at
the
pay
canopy
there
you
go.
B
E
Staying
outside
of
that
with
our
paved
parcels
and
then
the
second
point
for
the
the
transitional
areas,
we
did
try
to
minimize
the
the
impact
and
transition
areas
as
much
as
possible
on
the
east
side
of
the
site
there.
We
do.
We
encroach
in
it
a
little
bit
for
the
radius
area
to
enter
into
the
tunnel
wash
there's
a
minimal
amount
of
paving
there
and
the
light
hatch
that
you
can
see
on
both
sides
of
that
curved
radius
drive.
E
We
intend
to
fully
landscape
that
entire
area,
so
that
would
not
be
turf
that
would
be
fully
landscaped
and
then
over
on
the
other
side
of
the
site.
On
the
west
side,
we
do
need
a
considerable
amount
of
circulation
for
traffic
to
move
around
the
building
and
around
the
site.
So
that
side
we
are
encroaching
mostly
into
the
transitional
space
to
make
circulation
work
properly.
E
The
difficulty
that
we
have
on
that
west
side
of
the
site
is
we
need
to
provide
an
appropriate
amount
of
space
as
you
exit
the
tunnel
wash
so
that
we
don't
have
traffic
being
forced
into
the
lane
of
traffic
without
the
proper
ability
to
stop
and
let
people
pass
by
just
in
the
nature
of
how
how
the
tunnel
wash
works.
It's
a
conveyor
system,
so
everything
kind
of
runs
in
a
smooth
fashion.
And
if
someone
has
to
stop
inside
of
the
tunnel,
it
disrupts
the
operations
of
the
business.
E
So
we
really
need
to
provide
an
adequate
amount
of
space
outside
of
the
tunnel
exit
if
somebody
needs
to
stop
to
wait
for
traffic.
So
that's
kind
of
what's
driving
the
width
of
the
development
on
the
parcel,
and
then
this
here
image
is
it's
just
a
representation
of
the
general
aesthetic
of
the
building.
We
use
a
lot
of
stone,
glass
and
metal
on
the
building.
E
Everything
is
a
nice,
durable,
low
maintenance
materials
that
have
a
nice
high
value
for
aesthetics,
everything
everything's
very
well
up
kept,
and
this
one
was
taken
right
after
the
yard
was
put
in.
So
it's
just
sprouting
grass,
but
we
do
have
an
owner
on
these
parcels
that
takes
very
good
care
of
his
properties.
So
you
would
have
a
very
good,
very
good,
established
car
wash
in
this
location.
A
Thank
you,
mr
christopherson,
a
question
about
the
landscaping.
So
you
mentioned
a
lot
of
the
the
hatched
area
is
going
to
be
landscaped
with
with
vegetation
and
rock
you're
showing
18
trees
on
the
site
plan
is
the
intention
that
we
would
put
in
at
least
18
trees
on
this
property.
E
Yes,
we're
we
are
trying
to
show
the
the
requirements
along
both
of
our
front
yards
and
I
believe,
we're
meeting
that
requirement
of
the
one
to
forty
for
linear
frontage,
and
then
we
are
also
showing
at
least
six
other
interior
trees
for
landscape
purposes.
E
E
Correct
yep,
we
use
a
variety
of
good,
hearty
plantings.
Things
that'll
be
tolerable
to
the
the
locale
things
that
are
hardy
to.
If
there's
a
drought
like
we've
been
having
this
year,
things
that
aren't
gonna
die
on
us
and
and
are
able
to
be
pruned
up
and
and
kept
looking
nice
all
the
time.
A
And
the
the
space
that
would
be
in
the
transitional
yard,
subject
to
the
the
variance
approval
it's
not
to
be
used
for
for
parking.
It
looks
like
this
is
only
for
the
conveyance
of
traffic.
E
Correct
yeah,
the
the
stacking
area
on
the
south
side
of
the
building
that
has
three
lanes
of
stacking
for
servicing
the
the
traffic
through
the
tunnel,
and
that
I
think
I
submitted
a
a
diagram
that
showed
a
typical
stacking
in
there.
There
we
go.
E
So
you
can
see
we
can
stack.
At
least
you
know,
20
to
25
cars
in
that
area
before
we
would
ever
get
into
the
circulation
areas.
So
that's
that's
more
than
enough
stacking
to
be
able
to
serve
the
needs
of
the
tunnel.
The
the
drive
lane
on
the
west
side
of
the
site
is
purely
for
circulation
to
and
from.
A
B
A
Brandi
do
do
we
need
to
take
these
as
two
separate
actions,
one
for
the
conditional
use
and
one
for
the
variance
request.
B
A
And
we
talked
about
a
few
things
with
the
applicant
in
relation
to
the
landscaping
that
could
be
included
in
there
if,
if
we
would
like
the
the
no
less
than
18
trees,
the
other
landscaping
design
elements
represented
in
the
proposal,
the
space
to
be
used
for
conveyance
of
traffic
and
not
parking.
These
are
all
represented
on
the
plan
already.
But
if
we
want
to
include
them
in
the
conditional
use,
okay.
C
So
once
we
would
receive
the
site
plan,
that's
not
actually
a
requirement
to
be
submitted
with
the
conditional
use.
So
if
you
feel
comfortable
with
what
we
already
have
in
ordinance,
then
we
could
forego
additional
conditions.
B
F
If
I
could
just
make
a
comment
on,
I
guess
hours
of
operation
or
light
infiltration,
I
mean,
as
as
the
cars
are,
entering
and
exiting
the
the
tunnel.
F
A
C
F
Correct
and
so
I'm
sorry,
the
gentleman
that's
here
to
represent
what
are
their
typical
hours
of
operation-
I
mean
in
the
summer.
Obviously
it's
late
here
until
nine
ten
o'clock
do
they
have
lighting
that
they'll
be
open
later
in
the
evening,
or
is
it
typically
more
of
a
eight
to
five
eight
to
six
type
operation.
E
E
E
C
A
C
G
F
H
C
D
You
could
also
say,
as
shown
on
the
submitted
site
plan
or
something
like
that,
but
if
that
changes
a
little
bit,
then
that
might.
H
Well,
just
so
I'm
clear
so
the
next,
and
that
I'm
against
I'm
just
again
just
want
to
be
clear
that
the
next
business
and
that
would
go
in
between
him
and
well
to
the
west,
okay
of
his
property
in
the
event
that
they
needed
the
space.
Also
both
driveways,
could
have
joined,
correct.
C
They'll
they'll
have
curb
and
gutter
there,
because
they'll
still
have
their
property
lines
where,
if
they
wanted
to,
they
could.
But
we
we
really
do
need
to
bring
an
amendment
forward
for
this
transitional
yard
and,
like
I
said
that
was
discussed
in
2019,
because
now
we've
seen
two
and
this
area
is
developing,
and
so
it
is
problematic
it
was
really
to
and
then
typically
in
commercial
districts,
we
don't
have
a
setback.
The
only
time
that
there's
a
five
foot
setback
for
parking
is
when
it's
adjacent
to
residential.
C
C
When
you
know
on
this
site,
particularly
two
there
they
will
still
have
the
front
and
the
well
they're
double
frontage
green
space
reserved,
and
I
think
that's
really
where
we'd
want
to
see
the
green
space
anyway
and
just
a
10
foot
strip
and
obviously,
if
both
properties
are
having
it,
it's
20
feet.
But
it's
also
just
it's
inhibiting
people
being
able
to
use
their
sights
and
then
that's
just
a
matter
of
when.
If
we
bring
that
amendment
forward,
it's
just
a
matter
of
you
guys
deciding
if
that
is
necessary.
A
Yeah,
I
do
think
it
warrants
further
discussion
as
we've
developed
within
the
gateway
overlay
district,
and
it
sounds
like
that
was
the
feedback
from
the
2019
discussion
as
well.
Do
we
have
anything
in
the
works
brandy
or
propose
to
bring
before
the
plan
commission.
C
Yes,
we
we
can,
it
needs
to
be,
I
mean
because
this
was
something
in
2019
that
and
all
of
our
other
priorities
that
we
decided
for
the
next
two
years.
But
this
one
should
be
a
simple
thing
to
bring
forward
and
I
think
it
should
because,
like
I
said
this
area
is,
we
are
seeing
development
happening
and
we
just
need
to
figure
out
what
we
want
to
see
so
that
we
don't
have
to
bring
each
application
as
a
variance
request.
C
H
Okay-
and
just
because
you
know
I
like
to
my,
only
fear
would
be
so
the
next
company
comes
in
and
I'm
not
saying
that
I'm
not
going
to
grant
this
just
for
discussing
discussion
sake
when
you
are
planning
this
and
thinking
about
this.
So
let's
just
say
that
the
next
business
needs
all
of
their
lot
too.
Now,
all
of
a
sudden
we
have-
and
this
guy
needs
to
keep
his
his
traffic
there.
So
he
needs
that
curb
there
and
you
know
how
people
like
to
squeeze
through
businesses
and.
B
H
H
D
So
there
we
will
have
to
look
at
that
closely
from
a
traffic
perspective
and
have
the
engineering
staff
weigh
in
on
that.
But
that's
a
very
good
point
in
terms
of
sometimes
green
space
can
serve
as
that
is.
Is
that
area
just
having
that
and
the
curb
itself
could?
G
Well,
I'd
like
to
say
that
I
share
that
same
concern
and
a
smaller
scale,
but
another
car
wash
in
town
on
19th.
It
looks
like
it
was
intentionally
designed
to
have
contiguous
flow
amongst
the
lots.
However,
their
solution
now
is
to
put
parking
cones,
which
is
not
very
aesthetic,
and
it
can
create
some
confusion
when
people
are
migrating
through
the
areas.
G
So
I
would
ask
that
you
know
that
would
be
my
concern
as
a
future
development,
wise
and
then
I'd
hate
to
see
a
raised
square
curbing
or
something
like
that.
That
was
equally
kind
of
frustrating
for
people.
That
may
not
be
aware
it's
there
or
maybe
you
know
going
between
businesses
in
the
future,
and
you
know
running
over
a
you
know:
one
foot
curbing
that's
raised
and
that's
my
only
fear.
Yeah.
H
C
Yeah
definitely-
and
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
because
that
is
the
that
is
what
we
want
to
avoid
with
the
the
car
wash
on
19th.
I
don't
believe
I
was
here
when
that
conditional
use
was
approved,
I'm
not
sure
of
the
discussion,
but
they
do
have
a
stacking
area
on
their
private
property.
But
it's
more
comfortable
for
people
to
then
stack
over
near
dakota
butcher,
which
that's
private,
that's
their
parking.
C
So
I
think
that's
why
the
cones
had
to
go
into
place,
but
that's
all
within
the
design
and
then
I'm
sure
that
that
car
wash
doesn't
like
that.
They
have
to
have
cones
there
either
and
maybe
they
would
look
at
a
better
design.
But.
H
D
Just
as
a
quick
follow-up,
we
will
continue
working
with
the
applicant,
we'll
have
a
drt
review
meeting
for
other
comments
and
then
platt
to
get
the
property
planted
and
then
proceed
onto
building
permit.
Should
everything
meet
the
requirements.
A
Perfect.
Thank
you
all
right.
Moving
on
from
the
regular
agenda
to
the
open
public
comments,
did
anybody
wish
to
speak
on
something?
That's
not
on
the
agenda.