►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 08-02-2021
Description
City Council Meeting - 08-02-2021
A
B
Heavenly
father,
we
thank
you
for
this
this
day
this
day,
you've
given
us
to
live
and
move
about
this
about
whatever
you
call
us
to,
and
tonight
we
gather
the
freedom
we
have
to
gather
and
to
be
able
to
make
decisions
to
to
help
serve
a
community.
Lord
you've,
given
us
the
freedom
to
do
this,
and
we
thank
you
for
that
now.
B
I
just
ask
for
wisdom
tonight
for
all
of
us
that
are
involved
here
this
evening,
lord
wisdom,
to
to
be
able
to
follow
your
leading
and
and
guide
us
down
what,
whatever
even
unforeseen
paths
lord
help
us
to
to
have
discernment,
even
in
clarity
and
we're
where
we
may
be
going
in
the
weeks
and
months
and
years
to
come.
We
pray
this
in
jesus
name,
amen,.
D
E
A
F
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
noticing
that
any
further
comment
on
the
approval
of
the
consent
agenda,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
nay
motion
carries
we'll
start
the
meeting
with
public
comments.
Anyone
wishing
to
come
forward
and
address
the
council
with
matters
pertaining
to
the
governance
of
the
city
of
watertown
is
invited
to
do
so
now.
Just
please
say
your
name
and
keep
your
comments
to
the
point.
Thank
you.
G
G
They
told
us
the
ceiling
will
be
painted
black
to
cover
up
any
piping,
duct
work
and
wiring
from
being
so
noticeable.
We
have
chosen
a
light
gray
for
the
walls,
while
commercial
rubber
mop
boards.
In
a
darker
gray,
we
will
have
metal
doors
and
framing
because
they
are
more
durable.
The
contractor
is
currently
having
a
little
bit
of
problem
getting
supplies,
so
they
have
moved
our
earliest
move
date
to
september
1st
now.
G
G
G
Another
surprise:
we
needed
special
lights
in
the
pool
room
over
the
tables,
and
this
comes
at
an
expense
of
one
thousand
three
hundred
and
eighty
four
fifty
they
will
be
coming
from
jh
larson,
a
new
bingo
machine
cost
is
fifteen
thousand
seven
hundred
and
four
dollars
and
six
cents.
We
had
ordered
this.
The
bengal
machine
will
be
coming
from
watertown
wholesale
watertown
wholesale
is
donating
the
setup
and
wiring
that
is
estimated
value
of
two
thousand
dollars.
G
G
G
A
pa
system
was
donated
by
adventerra,
and
they
also
will
do
the
installation
at
no
cost.
They
are
giving
us
two
new
office
chairs
and
desks
along
with
two
tvs
for
the
wii
machines.
We
are
estimating
this
value
to
be
around
ten
thousand
dollars
carts
for
bingo.
Lunch
is
needed
because
of
the
lack
of
kitchen
counter
space.
This
is
at
a
discounted
price
from
maxwell
food
of
1921.98
randy
tupper
is
going
to
help
us
find
some
movers
for
the
pool
tables
and
it
sounds
like
jesse.
G
Craig
will
be
able
to
get
us
some
guys
to
help
move
the
big
items.
A
moving
container
will
be
provided
by
easy
store
at
no
cost.
All
we
have
to
do
is
feed
the
guys
and
we're
estimating
the
cost
of
pizzas
around
150
dollars.
We're
guessing
we're
going
to
have
about
10
to
12
helpers
for
the
office.
We
need
two
laptop
computers,
a
printer
two
monitors
software
setup
with
this
is
the
cost
of
four
thousand
nine
hundred
eight,
which
is
coming
from
connecting
point.
They
are
going
to
be
donating
150
in
labor.
G
We
would
like
to
get
ipads
for
classes
to
teach
our
members
how
to
download
books
from
the
library
also
teach
them
how
to
connect
to
their
family
on
facetime.
This
would
be
at
a
cost
of
553.76.
This
would
also
come
from
target.
We
did
get
gift
cards
from
them
and
that
is
listed
below
janitor
floor
cleaning
machine
would
be
5
324.99.
G
G
We'll
need
two
sewing
machines
with
cabinets,
and
this
would
be
about
three
thousand
3618.87
coming
from
needlework
sewing.
They
gave
us
300
off
of
the
two
machines
at
this
price.
Currently,
the
ladies
are
using
their
personal
machines
last,
but
mostly
very
important,
is
donor.
Plaques
we
had
an
estimate
of
1224.75.
G
G
G
Crawford
austin's
funeral
home
for
1
500,
great
western
bank
for
500
sanford
for
500
hartley
trucking
for
500
reliabank
for
300,
watertown,
ford
and
chrysler
for
215
50.
brighmann
insurance
for
100
target
gave
us
two
gift
cards,
totaling
50
dollars,
and
our
members
have
donated
a
total
of
2174.86
making
total
in
donations.
G
Thirty
one
thousand
two
hundred
and
seventy
four
eighty
six
county
fair,
has
donated
hamburgers
and
brats
for
grilling
to
have
a
free
will
donation
grill
out
where
we
made
one
thousand
eight
hundred
and
twelve
dollars
and
twenty
five
cents.
But
as
you
see,
we
are
still
short
funds
and
need
your
help.
We
hope
that
the
city
can
help
us,
along
with
our
community,
to
complete
these
needs.
We
still
are
short:
twenty
three
thousand
thirty
one
dollars
and
ninety
cents.
G
I
would
like
to
thank
first
of
all,
the
council
and
the
mayor
for
letting
us
tell
you
the
status
of
the
center
and
hoping
that
everybody's
hearts
will
be
able
to
come
out
and
help
us.
I
have
given
each
one
of
you
a
short
list
here.
It
shows
the
breakdown
of
what
we
need,
what
our
donations
and
our
fundraisers
and
with
the
balance
we
still
need.
A
A
A
With
that,
the
chair
will
is
there
anyone
else
for
public
comments,
seeing
none.
The
chair
will
entertain
a
motion
for
the
approval
of
tonight's
agenda,
moved
by
councilman
vilhauer
seconded
by
councilman
buehler.
Any
comments
on
that
see.
None
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye,
any
oppose,
say,
nay,
motion
carries
the
first
item
on
the
regular
agenda
is
an
application
for
a
special
event:
retail
license
to
shamrocks
and
edelweiss
corporation
from
4pm
saturday
august
28
2021
until
12
a.m.
A
H
Lisa
carrico,
formerly
a
board
member
of
the
boys
and
girls
club,
I
actually
resigned
at
the
end
of
june.
However,
I
am
involved
both
with
dempseys
and
with
the
boys
and
girls
club.
It's
that
time
of
year
again
and
we
are
holding
the
camel
races
and
dempsey's
graciously
offered
to
run
the
bar.
For
that
event,
it's
a
pretty
much
a
responsible
fun,
casual,
good,
fundraising
event
for
us,
it'll
be
held
on
august
28th
as
in
the
application,
and
I
invite
all
of
you
to
come.
H
It's
a
lot
of
fun
and
some
of
you
have.
I
know
some
of
you
have
been
there
before
and
have
had
a
good
time,
and
I
know
councilman
tupper
has
volunteered
his
time
at
our
event
every
year,
and
so
that's
all
there
is,
for
that
other
than
you
know,
we're
all
good
to
go.
If
you
guys
are
good
for
us
to
go
our
only
other
comment
which
isn't
entirely
related
but
is
related
to
the
boys
and
girls
club.
I
did
want
to
take
this
opportunity
too.
To
thank
you.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
to
the
council,
albeit
the
former
council,
that
some
of
you
have
carried
over
for
including
in
your
capital
improvement
budget,
our
roof
at
the
facility.
I
can't
tell
you
how
over
the
moon
excited
the
board
was
and
the
staff
we
are
just
totally
jazzed
about
that
and,
as
far
as
I
know,
it
went
along
pretty
well
without
a
hitch,
and
I
just
wanted
to
take
that
time
to.
Thank
you
guys.
So
that's
it.
C
A
F
F
A
J
J
The
the
basis
behind
this
ordinance
amendment
relates
to
the
street
cut
permits
that
we
allow
for
work
within
the
city's
right-of-way
we've
currently
and
previously
required
people
to
obtain
permits
for
work
within
the
right-of-way.
That
includes
work
to
actually
cut
into
the
asphalt
to
do
utility
work
to
install
new
sewer
service
lines.
Water
service
lines,
things
of
that
nature,
and
it
also
includes
work
related
to
stockpile
materials
in
the
street.
J
The
main
components
to
this
ordinance
amendment
since
we've
had
these
permits
in
place.
One
of
the
things
we've
found
we've
been
in
need
of
is
a
moratorium
or
a
prohibition
of
cutting
into
a
new
street
we've
found
in
the
past
that
we've
we'd
pave
or
repave
a
road,
and
then
days
later,
in
some
instances,
we've
had
people
come
in
and
cut
into
that
brand.
J
A
K
J
Absolutely
thank
you
mayor
councilman
paulson.
I
just
did
some
research
on
that
and
we
we
looked
at
several
other
communities,
street
cut
ordinances
and
found
that
very
few.
I
think
only
one
mentioned
anything
about
compaction,
so
we
did
not
incorporate
any
language
about
compaction
in
the
ordinance.
J
Neither
justin
or
I
are
opposed
to
that
language.
We
just
kept
it
out
because
that
seemed
universally.
What
other
communities
had
done
is
they
were
just
silent
on
it.
It
does
stand
to
reason
and
and
councilman
paulson's
point
from
an
engineering
standpoint.
It
stands
to
reason
that
there
would
be
some
compaction
effort
for
any
street
cut
that
occurs
in
our
roadways,
but
we
did
not
incorporate
any
specific
language
to
that.
J
Yes,
absolutely
the
permit
fee
varies
depending
on
the
type
of
work
so
for
an
excavation
permit,
where
you're
going
to
be
digging
into
the
street
for
utility
work.
That's
50
for
that.
Permit
then,
the
other
ones
that
I
mentioned
earlier,
like
storing
materials
on
the
street,
that's
only
25
dollars
and
if
they're
doing
any
curb
and
gutter
or
sidewalk
or
driveway,
work
that
permit
fee
is
also
only
25.
So.
I
The
violation,
so
I'm
clear,
if
there's
a
violation,
you
double
that
fee.
Now
we
have
people
that
do
this
and
try
to
kind
of
get
under
the
radar
and
get
it
done.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
is
that
really
sufficient?
I
mean
if
it's
going
to
cost
me
100
bucks
or
50
bucks,
I'm
going
to
take
my
chances,
maybe
do
we
should
we
give
some
thought
to
putting
a
little
bit
more
meat
behind
that
penalty.
J
Yeah,
I
would
say
that
either
a
combination
or
in
part,
whether
through
the
penalty
in
the
ordinance
or
simply
updating
the
permit
fees,
you
know
fifty
dollars
for
permanent
fee.
The
the
engineering
time
to
issue
the
permit
go,
do
a
field
inspection
depending
on
the
type
of
work,
maybe
two
field
inspections.
J
We're
probably,
I
could
say
confidently
not
recouping
city
staff
time
with
that
50
permit
fee.
So
maybe
that
alone
could
be
looked
at,
which
of
course,
is
is
adopted
through
a
separate
action
of
the
council
and
not
incorporated
in
this
ordinance,
but
either
the
permit
fee
itself
or
increasing
the
penalty,
as
listed
in
this
ordinance,
I
would
say:
you're
right
would
be,
would
make
sense.
I
F
F
J
Yes,
so
we
do
see
a
mix
of
of
applications
from
the
general
public
or
contractors
working
for
the
general
public,
and
we
also
see
a
great
number
of
a
great
amount
of
work
in
the
right-of-way,
obviously
related
to
watertown
municipal
utilities,
utility
work
now
as
far
as
municipal
utilities
is
concerned,
their
contractors,
according
to
the
ordinance,
are
supposed
to
come
and
and
receive
a
permit
from
the
city
engineering
office
to
perform
that
work.
Just
like
any
of
the
other
instances.
J
A
private
contractor
doing
work
for
the
general
public
that
sometimes
happens
sometimes
doesn't,
but
we're
trying
to
foster
a
better
understanding
of
the
permit
requirements
out
there
throughout
the
community.
No
matter
who
the
contractor
is
working
for,
but
the
basis
behind
it
is
that
the
contractor
doing
the
work
would
come
and
get
the
permit
from
the
city
engineering
office,
because
they're
the
ones
ultimately
held
responsible
and
liable
for
the
work
that
they've
done
and
the
excavation
and
the
backfill
and
the
reconstruction
of
the
work
that
they
demoed.
A
D
Thank
you,
mary
and,
if
I
could
bear,
I
got
a
number
of
questions
if
I
could
just
address
them,
yeah
believe
me
and
see
with
with
this
heath,
I'm
assuming
the
current
language
has
been
covered
with
utilities
municipal
utilities.
Are
they
in
agreement
with
that
or
are
there
changes
that
that
you
referenced
at
the
beginning,
take
care
of
any
concerns
that
that
they
had.
D
D
D
J
Yeah,
I
think
my
my
short
answer.
That
is,
if
the
planning
up
front
is
done
intentionally
and
well.
As
far
as
the
lot
layout
is
concerned,
the
coming
back
and
cutting
and
terminating
service
lines
that
aren't
going
to
be
utilized
is
pretty
minimal,
but
there
are
those
instances
that
do
still
arise.
So
when
a
subdivision
comes
in
and
they
have
their
lot
layout,
they
then
design
that
water
system
to
serve
a
service
line
per
lot.
J
Every
every
lock
gets
a
service
line
designed
and
then
subsequently
constructed
and
as
soon
as
those
sewer
and
water
mains
and
services
go
in.
That's
when
the
developer
follows
up
with
the
roadway
construction,
after
that,
so
everything's
there
in
place,
according
to
the
plat
and
those
construction
plans,
match
the
plat
and
everything's
in
sync.
J
Now
those
instances
do
still
arise
where
a
buyer
or
purchaser
of
the
property
wants
to
buy
two
lots,
for
example,
and
that's
probably
more
prevalent
in
like
commercial
subdivisions
than
it
is
residential
residential
or
a
few
more
regulations
in
place
where
you
know
lot
sizes
and
things
like
that
are
held
up
and
make
it
maybe
a
little
less
viable
to
see
those
changes
in
a
residential
subdivision,
but
commercial
subdivisions.
Definitely
that
happens
frequently
where
commercial
lot
or
land
buyer
wants
something
different
than
what
was
planted
and
constructed.
J
D
Okay,
a
couple
more
questions
here,
what
happens
with
if,
if
I'm
a
contractor,
I
come
to
you
for
a
permit.
Tell
you
what
my
scope
of
work
is
I
get
in
there
and
we
also
know
sometimes
the
scope
work
changes
significantly
based
on
what
we
find
do.
They
have
to
come
back
to
you
to
to
revise,
or
is
that?
Are
they
able
to
just
continue
with
with
the
the
changes
on
the
fly
so
to
speak
as
they
as
they
arise?.
J
J
So
this
is
just
us
checking
off
knowing
that
they're
there,
knowing
what
they're
going
to
be
working
on,
whether
it's
the
sewer
main
the
water
main
whatever
it
might
be.
So
really
if
they
run
into
something
in
the
field
that
modifies
their
construction,
it
really
doesn't
cause
or
necessitate
them
to
come
back
in
and
get
any
kind
of
an
amended
permit
from
us.
Not
the
scope
of
what
they're
wanting
to
do,
maybe
is,
is
blowing
up
in
the
field
because
they
have
to
dig
out
a
whole
half
a
block.
Instead
of
just
a
hundred
feet.
J
D
Okay
last
question:
we
note
that
there's
a
one
year,
warranty
period
in
there
and
it
kind
of
goes
to
what
colin
was
talking
about
and
that's
the
compaction.
It
seems
like
more
times
than
not
the
problems
that
we
see
with
these
things.
Is
they
just
they
sink,
so
we
come
in
and
we
backfill
and
we
put
blacktop
on
it
and
patch
it
and
then
a
year
later
they
sink,
and
now
it's
you're
constantly
running
over
them
is
our
one
year
period
sufficient
to
get
through.
D
J
Yes
great
question
again,
I
generally
speaking
I'll,
share
a
quick
story
here
in
a
prior
community.
I
worked
for
they'd
mark
on
the
curb
and
gutters
where
the
service
lines
went
into
the
property
they
put
a
w
for
the
water
service
line
and
it
asks
for
the
sanitary
sewer
service
line.
The
ongoing
joke
was
that
it
wasn't
to
indicate
where
the
services
are,
but
it
was
stood
for,
will
settle
and
settled
because
of
the
trench
settlement.
K
Thank
you
mayor
and
I'm
gonna
hit
on
the
planning
and
kind
of
the
idea
behind
this
being
written
and
implemented
now
into
the
city
is
obviously
we're.
Looking
for
integrity
of
our
streets,
we've
all
heard
the
discussion
on
how
our
streets
are
and
it
it's
frustrating
to
see
a
new
road
be
disturbed
immediately
and
we've
seen
it
over
and
over
in
this
community,
so
we're
trying
to
implement
enough
planning
into
everyone,
not
just
the
utilities,
not
just
the
city
side,
but
hopefully,
contractors
too,
where
they're
saying
all
right.
K
K
This
is
trying
to
help
the
a
to
aid.
The
discussion
of
our
street
conversation
because
our
trenches
are
the
biggest
issue,
especially
you
know,
on
19th
we
had
a
brand
new
road
and
there's
100
trenches
in
it,
and
obviously
that
was
an
emergency
situation,
but
it
just
goes
to
show
that
if
we
would
have
been
forward
thinking
and
had
planning
before
we
did
that
project
it,
we
could
have
probably
prevented
it
so
and
then
that
kind
of
goes
back
to
what
mike
asked
before.
K
B
B
B
J
J
D
D
D
You
know
so
it
seems
like
it's
there,
I'm
going
to
say
always
it's
probably
not
always,
but
so,
unless
we
have
a
means
of
following
up
before
that,
one
year
time
frame
is
up,
we
may
have
problems
that
we
we
don't
enforce,
and
so
really
I
would
be
specific
as
I
could
be,
and
the
whole
issue
then
becomes
enforcement
is
how
do
we?
How
do
we
flag
it
check
it
to
make
sure
at
the
end
of
one
year
warranty
that
it's
either
good
or
it's
not.
J
This
is
one
of
those
I
don't
want
to
say
lesser
concerns,
but
is
it
one
that
was
next
on
the
list
to
move
towards
putting
more
emphasis
on?
So
that's
something
we're
going
to
definitely
be
working
on
with
staff
again
that
comes
back
to
the
whole
presence
in
the
field
and
and
having
spot
inspections,
and
things
like
that,
but
following
through
with
each
of
these
permits,
as
far
as
the
warranty
is
concerned,
is
part
of
that
process
as
well.
I
J
Generally
speaking,
for
all
sewer
and
water
connections,
the
ran
laterally
90
degrees
from
the
main
to
the
property.
We
try
to
avoid
long,
winding
service
lines
running
through
the
right
of
way,
for
obvious
reasons.
Once
we
go
back
into
that
right
away
to
do
work,
it
creates
all
kinds
of
problems
and
and
coordinating
and
facilitating
that
work.
J
J
J
F
L
A
L
F
A
In
fact,
the
chair
would
like
to
ask
the
council
there
was
a
lot
of
very
good,
legitimate
questions
on
a
topic
that
has
been
important
in
watertown
for
a
while.
So
I
would
ask
the
council
if
the
general
mood
would
be
to
have
this
revisited
either
as
more
information
for
us
in
the
future,
or
there
were
a
couple
different
things,
such
as
the
staff
follow-up
on
some
of
these
locations.
Being
more
specific
with
the
some
of
the
language,
the
monetary
penalty,
the
planning
up
front
and
the
one-year
period
is
that
being
sufficient?
A
M
L
A
A
A
I
suppose
yeah
there
is
a
motion
on
the
floor,
so
motion
to
postpone
to
a
time
definite
next
city,
council,
meeting
correct,
moved
by
councilman
tupper
seconded
by
councilman
paulson
any
comments
on
that
motion
scene.
None.
We
will
vote
on
the
motion
to
postpone
action
until
the
next
city
council
meeting,
at
which
point
revisions
might
be
considered
all
in
favor.
Of
that
please
say:
aye
aye.
Any
opposed
motion
carries
we'll
revisit
this
at
the
next
meeting.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Next.
Item
on
the
agenda
is
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-32
subdivision
regulation
text,
amendment
to
chapter
24.05,
general
requirements
and
design
standards
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown
clarifying
the
floodplain
representation
requirements
on
platz
chair
will
entertain
a
motion
moved
by
councilman
danforth
seconded
by
councilman
buehler.
J
J
We
have
two
different
sections
that
discuss
that
in
our
current
ordinances,
one
of
them
specifically
says
that
the
boundary
of
the
floodplain
shall
be
identified
on
the
plat
and
the
other.
One
generally
says
that
a
note
will
be
included
on
the
plot
that
references.
The
flood
plain
firm
panel
number
that
ex
that
exists
for
that
platinum,
property
staff
and,
I
would
say,
applicants
developers
surveyors
in
particular
have
had
interest
in
removing
the
requirement
to
show
the
floodplain
boundary
on
the
maps.
J
Surveyors
have
issue
with
that,
because
it's
not
a
formal
part
of
their
survey
that
they're
stamping
when
they
put
a
plat
together.
It's
work
represented
for
done
by
others
and
for
the
for
that
reason
it
causes
some
some
concern
from
them
from
a
staff
standpoint.
We
recognize
and
acknowledge
that
floodplains
are
amended
from
time
to
time
and
those
boundaries
do
change
over
time,
so
by
showing
it
on
a
plat
with
the
physical
line
of
the
boundary
on
the
plat.
J
Having
the
understanding
that
that
could
shift
over
time,
we
felt
maybe
wasn't
an
appropriate
representation
of
the
floodplain,
rather
we
would
like
to.
Instead,
we
would
like
to
strike
that
language
from
the
ordinance.
That's
what
this
amendment
is
doing
and
we
would
retain
the
ordinance
requirement
that
still
lists
the
floodplain
firm
panel
number
on
the
face
of
the
platte
and
the
notes
of
the
plat.
J
So,
generally
speaking,
that
helps
clean
this
up
a
little
bit.
It
takes
care
of
that
discrepancy.
That's
in
the
ordinance
and
in
a
nutshell,
we
would
still
have
the
note
indicating
a
flood
plane
exists
and
give
the
right
firm
number
and
remove
that
requirement
of
showing
the
boundary
brandi
is
online
with
us
tonight.
Our
urban
planner.
If
we
have
any
questions
or
I
can
help
answer
them.
A
J
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
a
progress
change
order
as
the
work
has
commenced
on
10th
avenue
north.
As
with
any
project
this
magnitude,
we
always
have
some
reserve
money
within
the
budget
to
account
for
any
overruns
or
change
orders
of
this
nature.
I
would
say
that
most
of
these
on
here
pretty
routine
as
far
as
the
cause
for
the
change
orders,
some
of
it
includes
additional
sidewalk
work,
some
of
which
will
be
reimbursed
by
the
homeowner
at
the
end
of
the
project.
J
J
I
would
note
I
didn't
need
to
make
one
correction
here.
The
council
agenda
item
shows
a
change
order
amount
of
thirteen
thousand
three
ninety
five.
Seventy
we
did
have
to
reduce
that.
We
had
to
redact
a
couple
of
these
items
out
of
here,
because
they
are
related
to
watertown
municipal
utilities,
contract,
not
the
city's
contract.
J
A
F
J
The
original
original
resolution
of
necessity
did
include
an
estimate.
I
I
don't
believe,
we've
gone
back
with
any
final
numbers
to
them
yet,
but
we
we
would,
depending
on
how
the
final
numbers
pan
out,
we
have
options
in
state
statute
that
allows
us
to
continue
with
the
resolution
of
necessity,
number
or
fine-tune
that
based
on
final
costs
and
depending
what
those
final
costs
are,
we
would
likely
come
back
with
an
adjusted
number.
I.
F
J
J
E
Okay,
so
jason
peterson
civil
design,
inc,
the
sanitary
services
that
we
are
talking
about
when
those
got
dug
up.
We
found
that
those
were
some
of
them
were
six
inch
and
in
our
plans
we
had
included
four
inch,
four
inches
of
typical
residential
size,
and
so
it
was
determined
that
we
would
use
six
inch
service
pipe
in
order
to
tie
these
back
in.
F
J
J
J
N
Yes,
heath
that
is
correct.
There's
a
couple
of
homeowners
that
asked
for
additional
sidewalk
and
this
this
cost
would
be
relayed
or
assessed
back
to
them.
I
think
the
discussions
that
we've
had
with
the
particular
homeowners
that
they'd
reimburse
the
city
at
the
end
of
the
project
so
technically
won't
even
be
assessed.
It
just
would
be
paid
by
the
homeowner
at
the
end
to.
C
C
As
this
happens,
I
know
that
they
do
sometimes
make
contact.
Sometimes
they
don't
with
the
homeowner.
I
think
engineering
now
will
probably
go
back
and
determine
how
much
the
real
value
is
per
owner.
It
looks
like
a
lot
here,
but
it
could
end
up
being.
You
know,
100
bucks,
which
there
again
the
resolution
of
necessity,
kind
of
has
some
language
in
there
too,
that
they
know
this
isn't
ac.
You
know
it's
not
exact,
it's
an
estimate
and
then
what
will
happen
as
the
project
gets
closed
out
and
it
is
finalized.
C
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
further
council
comments
or
questions
seeing
none.
The
motion
is
to
approve
this
change
under
order,
as
amended
all
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
aye
aye,
any
opposed
saying
a
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
item
e,
a
first
reading
of
ordinance,
21-28
and
ordinance,
adding
chapter
7.22
to
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown,
creating
a
process
for
administrative
appeals.
This
is
a
first
reading,
no
motion
required.
L
Thank
you
mayor.
The
this.
This
change
to
our
ordinance
or
added
section
of
our
ordinance
comes
to
coincide
a
bit
with
our
change
in
form
of
government.
Here,
the
south
dakota
constitution
provides
that
homeworld
charter
community
can
essentially
establish
a
executive
legislative,
administrative
government
that
supersedes
state
law
so
long
as
there's
an
administrative
appeals
process.
That's
subject
to
judicial
review,
and
so
because,
with
this,
our
changing
form
of
government,
our
our
seven-member
council
city
manager,
former
government,
is
a
bit
different
than
what
statute
calls
for.
L
We
would
be
required
to
have
this
process
so
essentially
the
long
and
short
of
it
is.
It
provides
a
formal
relief
valve.
I
guess,
for
an
aggrieved
citizen
to
appeal
through
the
process
and
get
a
final
determination
by
an
independent
third
party
of
whether
or
not
the
process
or
whether
or
not
a
decision
was
was
valid,
and
then,
if
that
decision,
if
they
still
disagree
with
that
decision,
they
can
then
appeal
to
the
circuit
court.
One
piece
that
we
tweaked
since
we
first
considered
bringing
this
forward
is
we
had.
L
I
had
a
language
that
essentially
says
that
no
decision
is
appealable
unless
it's,
unless
there's
something
specific.
That
says
that
a
certain
person
in
the
organization
is
the
final
decision
maker,
for
example.
I
know
there's
multiple
instances.
It
says
the
city
engineer
can
can
approve
or
deny
certain
things,
but
unless
there's
something
specific,
no
decision
would
be
appealable
under
this
ordinance
unless
it
first
goes
through
the
city
manager.
A
D
L
L
L
Yeah
and
there's
a
case
to
be
made
that,
as
we
sit
right
here
today,
that
a
decision
of
the
finance
officer
is
potentially
appealable
today
directed
to
the
circuit
court
circuit
courts
in
south
dakota
operate
under
the
open
courts
doctrine,
they
basically
will
take,
take
all
comers
almost
you
know,
but
this
really
formalizes
the
process
so
going
forward
once
this
is
implemented
after
publication
and
effectiveness,
a
decision
that
would
not
otherwise
be
appealable
would
go
through
this
process.
If
somebody
disagreed
with
the
city
manager
or
a
final
decision
maker.
L
A
Thank
you.
Any
council
comments
on
that
last
mo
any
for
any
further
questions
or
comments
from
the
council
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much.
Next.
Item
on
the
agenda
is
another
first
reading
of
an
ordinance
number
21-33
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
watertown,
south
dakota
for
lot
8
and
a
portion
of
lot
7
in
block
3
of
the
platte
of
watertown
development
company
edition
from
i2
heavy
industrial
district
to
i1
light
industrial
district.
J
J
J
And
if
you
can
see
that
on
the
map,
this
area-
that's
hatched
here-
is
the
property
to
be
rezoned.
You
can
see
in
the
zoning
designations
around
here
that
this
darker
purple
area
is
what's
remaining
of
i2
in
this
air.
This
district
along
21st
street
southwest,
so
northwest
of
here
is
the
airport
property
straight
north
are
the
some
of
the
ball
fields
and
the
complex
further
north
of
there
and
then,
of
course,
south
of
the
property
here
on
21st
is
highway
212..
J
So
this
this
area,
this
hash
is
the
areas
proposed
to
be
rezoned,
and
I
believe
we
did
an
area
up
here
further
northeast
in
the
last
couple
years.
It
was
also
rezoned
from
i2
to
i1,
but
this
was
recommended
for
approval
by
the
planning
commission
and
before
you
tonight
for
first
reading
and
again
brandy,
hampton
urban
planner
or
I
can
both
help
answer
any
questions.
A
All
right
seeing
none,
we
will
move
on
to
the
next
item
on
the
agenda:
approval
of
insurance
policies
and
authorization
for
payment
for
premiums
for
general
liability,
auto
liability
and
physical
damage,
law
enforcement,
liability,
buildings
and
contents
equipment,
property
damage
and
equipment
breakdown,
boiler
and
machinery
coverage
and
authorization
for
the
finance
officer
to
issue
a
special
check
with
that.
The
chair
will
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
this
by
councilman
vilhauer
seconded
by
councilman
paulson
and
we'll
open
public
testimony.
By
going
to
our
finance
officer,
kristen
bobzin.
C
Thank
you
mayor
before
the
council
tonight
is
our
standard
insurance
renewal
through
south
dakota
public
assurance
alliance.
The
memo
that
I
attached
kind
of
breaks
down
the
increase.
It
was
a
12.3
percent
increase
about
51
000
over
last
year's
premium.
Some
of
that
can
be
equated
to.
We
did
do
our
standard
on
review
of
all
property.
That
happens.
C
I
think
it's
every
five
years,
but
they
go
through
pretty
much
with
a
fine
tooth
comb
and
review
all
of
our
physical
property
kind
of
reevaluate
it
based
off
their
again
of
its
condition
and
what
the
market
is
kind
of
driven.
So
some
of
that,
when
we
talk
about
our
our
property
values
went
up.
That's
due
to
that
being
done.
We
also
did
add
some
property
to
the
insurance,
our
new
admin
building
at
wastewater,
the
increase
of
value
there
for
that,
and
then
also
the
future
city
hall,
the
old
wells
fargo
building.
C
So
those
were
some
bigger
dollar
amounts
for
our
property,
also
a
little
bit
of
increase
in
our
law
enforcement
liability
and
that's
due
to
the
three
new
officers
that
were
added
to
the
budget
other
than
that
it
was
a
standard
renewal.
I
know
the
increase
seems
a
little
bit
high,
but
I
think
with
having
that
valuation
done,
our
lost
credit
did
come
back
at
21
000.
So
with
everything
I
feel
like.
It's
good.
We've
always
been
happy
with
south
dakota
public
assurance
alliance,
and
I
think
they
do
a
good
job.
C
E
B
C
F
C
So
for
this
renewal,
just
because
it
is
due
now
the
the
plan
and
I've
talked
to
adam
at
watertown,
municipal
utilities
is,
we
will
be
staying
together
for
this
and
diving
into
this
next
round
of
really
getting
what
that
cost
looks
like
not
only
for
the
utilities
but
also
for
the
city,
so
that
everybody's
well
aware
of
what
that
split
would
would
look
like.
So
that's
the
plan.
C
A
Any
further
council
comments
or
questions
seeing
none.
The
motion
is
to
approve
the
policies
and
payment
for
premiums.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
for
the
professional
services
agreement
for
services
associated
associated
with
the
willow
creek
sub
basin
drainage
study,
update
with
ulteg
engineers,
incorporated
in
the
amount
of
nine
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
and
authorize
the
city
manager
to
sign
all
applicable
documents,
we'll
open
up
public
testimony
by
going
to
our
public
works
director
heath
von
nai.
A
J
J
J
J
K
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
director
bonai
I
do
have.
I
know
this
study
pretty
well
from
working
here
before,
and
I
guess
my
thought
is:
why
won't
we
just
update
the
whole
drainage
study
instead
of
just
one
portion
of
it
and
obviously
I
know
that
comes
with
increased
increased
cost,
but
if
we're
going
to
update
a
study
with
the
way
our
city
is
growing
and
the
potential
for
growth
in
this
city,
I
guess
my
comment.
J
I
think
that
merits
some
some
follow-up,
that
I
guess
my
comment
to
that
councilman
paulson
would
be.
I
don't
believe
that
we've
seen
as
much
disruption
to
the
plan,
if
you
will
in
all
these
other
sub-base
areas,
so
I'm
not
sure
that
an
entire
comprehensive
update
would
necessarily
be
warranted.
Just
due
to
that
fact,
I
think
that
we've
more
or
less
either
not
seen
development
or
any
disruption
of
the
original
plan,
and
things
are
kind
of
as
they
were
back
in
2007.
J
A
A
J
J
Some
of
the
things
that
sparked
interest
in
seeing
this
model
is
just
general
growth
and
development
throughout
the
community.
We'd
oftentimes
have
questions
about
sewer
capacities
in
an
engineering
office
or
the
wastewater
division
of
public
works,
wouldn't
necessarily
have
clear
answers
for
them.
So
we
knew
one
of
the
ways
to
obtain
better
information
would
be
through
a
comprehensive
sewer
study
for
the
entire
city.
J
With
that
we've
got,
we
have
hdr
on
the
line
with
us.
I
believe
scott
humphrey
from
hdr,
who
did
a
lot
of
the
the
brunt
of
the
work
on
this
model,
is
with
us
this
evening
and
can
walk
through
some
slides
that
they
have
prepared
and
talk
about.
Some
of
the
highlights
from
the
study.
Scott.
Are
you
in
line
with
us?
Yes,
sam.
O
Okay,
great
so
good
evening,
I'm
scott
humphrey
from
hdr-
and
I
am
here
to
talk
about
the
2020
sanitary
sewer
capacity
model
and
results
of
the
analysis.
So
I've
I've
prepared
a
high
level
presentation
here.
I've
got
about
five
or
six
slides.
I
don't
want
to
go
into
too
much
detail,
but
I'll
open
it
up
to
questions
at
the
end
and
I'd
be
happy
to
go
into
as
much
detail
as
you
would
like.
O
I'm
going
to
talk
about
those
capacity
results
and
then
talk
about
the
next
steps
from
here,
what
you
can
do
with
the
model
and
and
what
we
should
be
using
it
for
moving
forward.
So
a
project
overview
quickly.
The
the
city
went
out
to
rfp,
as
was
mentioned,
they
wanted
to
develop
a
hydraulic
model
that
could
evaluate
capacity
not
only
today
but
in
the
future,
as
development
comes
in
and
wants
to
connect
to
the
sanitary
sewer
system.
O
O
Now,
subsequent
to
the
study,
we
had
a
request
from
stony
point
to
add
68,
000
gallons
per
day
upstream
of
lift
station
12,
which
flows
into
lift
station
11,
which
is
on
the
north
west
side
of
the
figure
near
near
the
lake
and
and
what
we
found
there
is
that
that
development
would
actually
exceed
the
capacity
of
12
and
12
flows
into
11.
So
it
would
actually
exceed
the
capacity
of
of
11
as
well.
O
So
that
was
the
existing
system,
and
then
we
moved
forward
to
the
future
2035
system
and
when
we
run
peak,
wet
weather
flows
through
this
system,
as
can
be
expected
with
future
flows.
Based
on
what's
projected
to
build
out
today,
we've
got
a
number
of
additional
pipe
capacity
limit
stage
stations
now
we're
at
27
instead
of
just
14,
so
almost
double
and
we're
starting
to
hit
our
limit
on
some
pump
station
capacities,
lift
station,
11,
13
and
and
23
are
are
hitting
their
limits
and
and
those
those
will
need
to
that.
O
O
We
had
to
make
some
assumptions
based
on
the
data
we
had,
so
it
would
be
good
to
go
back
in
the
future
as
we
can
and
collect
some
of
that
data
and
and
validate
and
get
it
into
the
model.
The
other
thing
here,
which
I
probably
should
have
mentioned
up
front,
is
because
of
the
data
that
we
had.
We
decided
to
do
a
trunk
system
model
which
was
basically
12
inch
mains
and
greater,
and
then
some
pump
stations
for
for
connectivity
that
we
were
interested
in.
O
So
one
of
the
next
steps
also
would
be
to
start
to
fill
in
some
of
the
model
with
some
of
these
non-trunk
mains
and
then
maybe
even
more
pump
stations
and
in
facilities
upstream
so
start
to
fill
in
the
model,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
tying
this
to
gis
is
we
made
sure
that
as
new
data
is
collected
and
as
we
could,
we
could
update
this
model
and
basically
fill
it
in
without
much
much
effort.
We
also
want
to
update
future
projections.
O
We
were
using
your
general
plan
or
land
use
data
and,
as
new
data
becomes
available
as
specific
development
comes
into
town,
you
have
specific
plan
information.
We
want
to
get
that
into
the
model
and
analyze
that,
and
probably
the
biggest
benefit
for
the
hydraulic
model
is
that
now
you
have
a
tool
that
you
can
use
to
analyze
future
growth
as
future
growth
comes
in.
O
O
Well,
what
we
would
need
to
do
is
start
to
expand
this
model
out
around
the
lake
and
and
fill
this
in
with
pump
station
capacities
and
and
the
data
now
now
the
nice
thing
about
our
model
is
that,
even
though
we
skeletonized
it,
we
have
run
all
of
the
flows
that
would
have
flown
through
these
facilities
into
this
pump
station.
So
they
did
get
point
loaded
and
flowed
downstream.
O
Right
so
that
that
would
probably
be
my
recommendation,
for
you
know
when
I
say
next
steps
here
on
filling
in
this.
What
we
didn't
model
is
is,
let's
start
to
look
at.
Where
are
the
the
high
priority
items
or
the
areas
that
you're
most
interested
in,
and
we
can
start
to
start
to
fill
in
the
data
gaps
and
and
put
that
data
in.
O
It
was
not,
we
had
a
limited
flow
monitoring
period,
so
we
did
two
weeks
of
of
dry
weather
flow
calibration
and
unfortunately,
with
with
two
weeks,
it's
usually
not
enough
time
to
get
a
storm.
If
we
were
lucky
enough
to
get
a
storm
during
those
two
weeks,
we
we
could
have
done
some
ini,
but
but
I
guess
the
the
short
answer
is
no.
We
didn't
do
it.
An
exhaustive
ini
study
at
for
this
location
for
this
at
this
time,.
O
Oh
infiltration
and
inflow
it's
basically
the
the
rainfall
that
gets
back
into
the
sewer,
either
through
cracks
or
leaks,
or
sometimes
illicit
connections,
some
grain
connections
or
roof
drain
connections.
So,
basically
anything
that's
not
sanitary
sewer
that
gets
into
the
into
the
collection
system.
A
K
O
O
We
loaded,
we
developed
a
peak
factor
equation
for
you,
so
we're
peaking
these
dry
weather
flows
through
a
steady-state
model,
which
is
relatively
conservative.
So,
even
though
we
didn't
do
an
exhaustive
ini
study
to
to
you
know
to
start
to
dive
into
the
details
of
routing
a
storm
through
the
system,
we
did
run
a
peak
factor
equation
and
accounted
for
wet
weather
flows
above
and
beyond
the
the
sanitary.
I
J
I
Yes,
what
we
do,
for
example,
right
now
lift
station
43
on
south
highway
81.
that
lift
station
has
quite
a
bit
of
capacity,
but
over
time
we've
developed
a
lot
of
information
on
it
and
we
know
that
the
limiting
factor
to
that
lift
station
is
simply
would
be
to
increase
the
force
main.
So
in
conjunction
with
the
project
that
we're
doing
next
year,
we
will
upsize
that
force
main
while
we're
digging
in
the
area
which
will
actually
allow
that
lift
station
to
have
more
future
capacity.
I
I
D
L
D
L
Not
that
I'm
aware
of
there
might
be,
is
I
don't
know
if
tk's
on,
I
know
that
there
is
some
sort
of
formal
or
informal
relationship
amongst
the
park
department
in
the
senior
center.
I
believe
that
they
help
facilitate
some
some
events
with
them
and
I'm
not
sure
the
extent
of
that
relationship,
but
I
expect
that
that
would
continue.
L
Yes,
yes,
I
think
that
would
probably
continue,
but
as
far
as
our
owning
and
and
being
responsible
for
the
space
itself,
we
would
our
our
obligations
for
them
are
going
to
cease
once
they
transfer
to
that
new
space.
Now
you
know,
as
far
as
their
request
tonight
that
you
know,
obviously
that
doesn't
prevent
the
council
from
taking
action
to
help
them
out
in
in
some
way,
but
there's
nothing
contractually
obligating
us
to
it.
B
C
I
don't
have
it
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
do
know
that
we
do
contribute
to
icap,
but
I
don't
think
we've
actually
ever
given
anything
to
the
senior
citizen
center
as
far
as
an
external
organization
contribution,
but
I
do
know
that
we
have
put
dollars
forth
to
help
maintain
that
building.
I
know
we
did
some
roof
work
and
we've
done
some
of
the
other
upgrades
as
per
the
lease.
C
I
I
Kind
of
relates
in
there-
maybe
there's
food
over
there,
so,
but
no,
I
I
do
want
to
comment
on
just
another
issue
that
in
regards
to
what
our
current
discussion,
that's
the
55,
plus
dining
just
to
kind
of
come
out,
bring
everybody
up
to
speed.
I
think
I'd
mentioned
before
we
were
looking
at
trying
to
utilize
the
equipment
that
exists
currently
at
the
old
facility,
and
last
week
I
met
with
the
park
and
wreck
director
terry
kelly
park
and
rec
director.
Terry
kelly.
I
Was
there
other
representatives
from
the
zoo
as
well
as
park
and
rec,
and
it
looks
as
though
a
lot
of
the
a
lot
of
that
equipment
will
be
usable
in
other
locations,
the
potentially
the
hood
and
the
suppression
system,
along
with
the
stainless
steel
tables
and
there's
numerous
refrigeration
units
and
freezers,
that
it
looks
like
we'll
be
able
to
utilize
in
other
areas
with
the
park
and
rec
department.
So
and
the
zoo
thank
you,
which
is
part
of
the
park.
Thanks.
F
B
B
B
M
Sure
I
had
responded
to
councilman
tupper
late
last
week
that,
if,
if
they
had
wanted
to
come
and
make
a
request
to
the
city
that
they
needed
to
submit
it
in
writing
to
the
finance
officer
and
that
we
would
bring
it
to
council
for
discussion,
I
think
the
number
that
we
had
that
had
been
presented
with
six
thousand.
They
were
gonna
ask
for
a
six
thousand
dollar
contribution
towards
this
twenty
three
thousand
dollar
shortage,
but
I'll.
Let
councilman
tupper
fill
in
the
the
rest
of
the
details.
B
Yes,
originally
the
discussion
with
the
city
manager
and-
and
the
mayor
was
at
the
6000,
because
I
kind
of
took,
wants
and
needs
analysis
with
them.
I've
been
helping
them
trying
to
raise
some
money
for
this
really
needing
the
six
thousand
dollars,
get
the
new
tvs
and,
of
course,
they
run
into
which
I
wasn't
aware
of
till
the
day,
with
the
software,
the
electrical
part
of
it
or
whatever.
B
K
But
there
just
seemed
to
be,
you
know,
they're
asking
for
four
smart
tvs
and
then
they're
also
asking
for
two
tvs
just
for
the
wii
systems
and
it's
like
they're.
You
know
that
was
gonna
be.
My
comment
is
there
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
wants
and
not
necessarily
needs
at
this
point
but
yeah.
I
guess
if
it's
not
the
full
20.
A
It
would
be
my
interpretation
that
a
formal
request
would
have
to
be
made
by
the
organization
to
the
city
staff,
barring
that
it
could
also
appear
on
the
agenda.
If
two
council
people
wanted
to
place
it
on
the
agenda,
but
I
would
ask
that
a
specific
amount
would
be
requested
and
for
what?
Because
that
would
definitely
be
part
of
the
debate-
is
what
is
a
want?
What
is
a
need?
A
Councilman,
tupper
and
myself
were
both
aware
of
some
of
the
things
that
are
going
on
and
the
money
that
they're
trying
to
raise.
I
allowed
some
leeway
for
valgronky
to
come
and
testify
in
part
to
hope
that
the
community
might
see
this
and
help
come
forward
with
donations,
because
I
do
believe
that
this
would
be
a
good
community
asset,
and
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
it
is
the
city's
responsibility,
however,
to
pay
for
all
of
this.
But
that
can
be
a
debate
among
the
full
council
and
I
believe
it
might
be.
A
B
Tupper
and
if
it's
fine
with
everybody
else,
I'll
reach
out
to
val
in
the
next
couple
days
and
kind
of
sit
down
with
her
again
and
try
to
get
an
exact
number
and
a
wants
and
needs,
you
know,
and
and
of
course
it's
all
needs.
Of
course
we
all
want.
If
we
built
a
new
house,
we
all
want
all
new
furniture,
but
once
and
needs
are
two
different
things.
So
I
I
will
reach
out
to
her
and
see
what
we
can
formally
get
together
and.
D
For
2021.,
okay,
I
would
one
things
I
think
that
we
should
do,
though,
is
like
we
do
with
everybody
else
that
we
fund
on
outside
is.
Is
we
do
look
for
a
what's
where
they
want
to
use
a
a
transparency
in
regards
to
like
their
assets?
If
they've
got
savings
and
you
know
their
financials,
if
whatever
that
is
so
that
we
have
a
statement
of
knowing
where
they're
at
to
know
what
we
should
be
doing,
we
do
that
with
everybody
else,
and
we
should
have
that
same
thing
here.
B
D
Even
if
it's
not
yearly
randy,
I
think
we
still
need
to
know
what
their
financials
are.
If
we're
going
to
be
giving
away
taxpayer
dollars
to
something
whether
it's
annual
or
whether
it's
a
one-time
offer,
I
think
we
we
have
that
that
obligation
to
the
taxpayers
to
know
what
who
we're
giving
our
money
to
and
what
their
financial
standing
is.
I
wouldn't
totally
disagree
with
that.
So.
A
And
this
was
old
business,
but
on
this
one
not
that
this
was
getting
contentious
or
anything
but
in
the
future.
When
there's
conversation
like
this,
it
should
still
go
through
the
chair
to
make
certain
that
if
a
question
does
not
want
to
be
answered
or
things
like
that,
but
on
more
contentious
issues
going
forward.
I
think
that
would
be
more
appropriate.
So
just
wanted
to
advise
the
council
on
that,
but
city
manager,
mike.
M
Thanks
councilman
bill
howard,
just
just
what
we
had
reported
in
our
bi-weekly
leadership
update
to
the
council,
continue
to
communicate
with
with
dick
strasberg
we're
looking
at
august,
9th
and
10th
to
go
and
tour
ice
facilities.
I
did
send
an
email
to
all
of
you
prior
to
this
meeting,
both
of
our
council
committee.
Members
are
unable
to
attend
so
we're
looking
for
at
least
one
other
elected
official
who
might
be
able
to
go
on
those
dates.
I
Just
a
question
in
that
regard,
I
I
know
that
first
off
glenn
and
I
have
been
fairly
intimately
involved
with
this
whole
process
and
unfortunately,
neither
one
of
us
are
going
to
be
able
to
attend.
I
know
I
I
had
talked
to
dick
strasberg
a
little
bit
last
week
and
amanda.
I
think
I
you
and
I
had
the
discussion
as
well
about
potentially
moving
that
date
is
that
is
that
still
possible,
because
according
I
mean
in
my
discussion
with
dick,
he
said
yeah,
we
need
to
move
that
out.
M
Well
that
we're
on
a
public
meeting,
we
can
continue
to
look
at
it
if
we
need
to
change
the
date.
I
do
know
that,
just
with
the
outside
organizations
that
are
attending
those
dates
worked
for
them,
so
I,
I
guess
I'll
take
direction
from
you
all.
If
you
would
prefer
that
we
try
to
find
some
later
dates,
we
can
do
that.
A
A
F
M
Take
it
well,
I'm
gonna,
look
at
city
attorney
roby
to
provide
an
update
on
that.
I
will
say:
there's
an
internal
working
group
who,
who
has
spent
a
considerable
amount
of
time,
vetting
potential
regulations
around
medical
marijuana,
looking
at
proposed
rules
from
the
state
and
how
they
may
apply
to
the
city.
Matt
can
give
a
better
update
on
where
we're
at
in
the
in
the
actual
process
of.
L
L
L
What
we're
tentatively
looking
at
or
proposing
the
first
formal
action
or
formal
proposal
will
occur
at
the
second
council
meeting
of
august,
where
there
will
be
a
first
reading
of
the
ordinance
and
then
in
between
that
first
reading
and
second
reading
at
that
planned
commission
is
where
the
planned
commission
will
consider
and
approve
the
ordinance.
What
kind
of
got
a
little
bit
goofed
up
here?
A
L
L
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
city
manager
mack,
and
I
as
well
as
some
council
people
and
staff,
have
been
in
contact
with
representatives
from
the
state
and
the
district
five
legislators
to
discuss
and
prepare
for
this
going
forward.
So
any
further
new
business
see
none
are
there
liaison
member
reports
councilman
bill,
hauer,
sorry.
F
It
was
addressed
to
you
at
kxlg
last
week
as
far
as
water
and
electricity
usage,
what
we
were
being
told
at
the
meeting
last
week
is
they're
holding
their
own,
don't
anticipate
any
kind
of
you
know,
rationing
or
anything
of
that
nature
relative
to
water
and
electricity
use
so
good
shape.
There
everybody's
probably
seen
the
the
the
charging
stations
out
at
hyvee.
I
think
the
understanding
initially
was
that
those
would
only
be
able
to
be
utilized
by
those
owning
tesla
vehicles.
F
That,
apparently,
is
not
the
case
and
randy
or
looks
like
you're
agreeing
with
me
on
that,
so
those
charging
stations
would
be
available
to
the
general
public
if
you'll
have
an
electric
car
so
I'll
just
pass
that
on
they.
The
utilities
had
a
record
month
of
billings.
Last
month
they
build
over
five
million
dollars
in
billings.
F
F
Those
costs
will
only
be
20
percent
incurred
by
the
developer,
2022
40
percent
until
up
by
2025,
the
developer
will
be
bearing
100
percent
of
the
cost
of
those.
Those
water,
main
installations
and
presumably
developer,
will
then
pass
have
to
pass
those
costs
on
to
the
ultimate
property
owner.
So
that
will
be
something
that
could
have
an
impact.
You
know
upon
development
and
ultimate
homeowners
here
in
watertown,
but
that,
but
their
board
did
pass
that
policy
change
here
very
recently,.
K
Thank
you
mayor.
I
am
going
to
speak
on
that
as
well
coming
from
the
development
side
that
is
alarming
from
the
development
community.
It's
something
that
we
tried
to
push
back
on
a
little
bit
and
was
we
were
met
with
pretty
much
great
force
by
their
leaders,
saying
don't
even
go
there.
This
is
our
decision,
and
this
is
what
we
decided
and
I
do
think
it
is
going
to
have
an
effect
on
our
community.
K
A
negative
effect
actually-
and
I
talked
about
this
with
glenn
a
little
bit
too
previously-
is
it's
going
to
start
affecting
the
relationship
between
developers
in
the
city
even
more
than
it
has,
and
I
think
trying
to
work
on
that
relationship
is
going
to
be
key
not
only
from
the
city
side
of
things
into
the
utilities,
but
I
just
wanted
to
touch
base
with
a
little
a
little
bit
on
this,
because
we
are
you're.
Gonna
see
lot
increases.
K
The
costs
are
already
going
up
by
a
couple
thousand
dollars
per
lot
because
we're
putting
and
we're
only
doing
20
this
year.
If
we
were
to
actually
phase
it
in
like
we
were
intending
to,
it
would
have
been
a
lot
larger
than
that
per
lot,
and
I
guess
it's
something
that
I
feel
like
should
be
part
of
a
larger
discussion,
at
least
with
utilities,
and
I
know
that
our
relationship
is
already
not
great
with
the
utilities.
That's
what
the
feeling
I
get,
but
it's
affecting
the
relationship
with
developers
as
well.