►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 06/07/2021
Description
City Council Meeting - 06/07/2021
B
B
Us-
and
we
thank
you
for
this
time
together
for
the
work
that
to
the
mayor,
the
city
council,
does
we
pray
that
you
would
bless
the
deliberations
and
the
conversations
and
the
discussions
for
the
greater
good
this
night
and
we
pray
that
you
would
be
with
us
as
well
in
all
we
do
day
in
and
day
out,
all
this,
lord
with
grateful
hearts.
We
pray
in
the
name
of
jesus
christ.
Our
lord
amen,
amen,.
A
A
D
E
F
B
E
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
I
have
a
motion
by
helene
and
a
second
by
manti,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Anyone
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
the
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
public
comments.
This
is
the
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward
and
do
so.
A
A
See
no
one
will
move
on
to
item
7
approval
of
agenda
and
I
have
a
whole
bunch
of
changes
to
make
here.
So,
first
of
all,
I'm
going
to
move
item
x,
which
is
the
multi-purpose
ice
arena
update,
which
was
the
last
item
on
the
agenda.
I'll
move
that
to
the
first
item
on
the
agenda,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
you
are
here
to
talk
about
that
or
listen
anyway.
So
we'll
move
that
to
the
top,
and
then
I
want
to
move
item
n
immediately
after
that,
so
n
will
be.
J
C
A
D
So,
as
chairman
of
the
ice
committee
for
the
city
council
of
watertown,
I
just
wanted
to
give
an
update
as
to
a
lot
of
exciting
things
that
have
been
happening
and
the
momentum
that
continues
to
build
to
solve
this.
Let's
say
years
old,
if
not
decades-old,
problem
that
the
city
of
watertown
has
been
trying
to
solve.
D
Just
to
give
you
a
quick
idea
of
what
the
agenda
is
we'll
go
through
a
history
discuss
the
march
29th
presentation
where
we
voted
unanimously
to
approve
this
proposal.
Our
memorandum
of
understanding,
quick
talk
about
finance.
We
will
hear
from
our
owner's
representative
dick
strasberg
from
tegra
group,
we'll
discuss
the
engineering
and
keeping
the
momentum
before
I
go
any
further.
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
do
have
some
visitors
out
here
and
I
wanted
to
in
particular
point
out
mark
vox
from
watertown
development
company.
He
is
here
to
discuss
this
if
need
be.
D
We
also
have
jamie
andrews
from
j
j,
earthworks
jesse
craig
from
craig
llc
and,
of
course,
the
city
council.
So
we
have
all
four
players
who
signed
the
memorandum
of
understanding
that
is
keeping
this
project
going
forward.
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
adam
sullivan,
the
head
of
our
design,
review
committee
and
vince
foley,
president
of
watertown
hockey
association
and
marcy
cole,
president
of
watertown
figure
skating
club.
D
D
In
february,
first
premier
bank
pledged
one
million
dollars.
Now
this
is
just
one
million
of
3.75
million
dollars
that
we
have
pledged.
If
this
proposal
goes
forward,
we
had
our
city
council
presentation
on
march
29th
of
this
year
at
the
lakes
at
willow
creek.
It
received
unanimous
approval
to
move
forward
with
a
memorandum
of
understanding.
I
want
to
make
that
clear.
We
didn't
vote.
The
idea
was
not
finished
at
that
time.
It
was
just
we
agreed
to
a
momentum
of
a
memorandum
of
understanding
to
move
forward
to
reach
completion.
D
We
had
the
full
support
of
the
council
and
the
mayor.
I
encourage
anyone
who
is
curious
as
to
the
proposal
go
back
and
watch
that
and
see
the
glowing
reviews
that
all
of
us
up
here
said
about
it
april
of
this
year
we
hired
tegra
group,
dick
strasberg,
representing
them
as
our
owners
rep
for
the
city,
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
above
board
architecture,
soil,
flood
everything
may
of
this
year.
The
planning
commission.
Just
a
couple
weeks
ago,
planning
commission
commission
unanimously
approved
the
plat
for
the
lakes
at
willow
creek.
D
Also
in
last
month,
we
visited,
as
the
ice
committee
visited
several
sites
to
move
forward
with
architectural
designs
and
move
forward
with
this
project
ongoing.
We
just
need
to
commit
to
this
process
and
see
the
memorandum
of
understanding
through
to
completion.
That's
what
we
agreed
to
on
march
29th
and
that's
what
we
are
here
to
basically
keep
moving
forward
with,
and
with
this
we
have
true
collaboration.
We
have
had
staff
in
on
several
city
staff
in
on
several
meetings.
D
G
I
will
address
the
memorandum
of
understanding.
Many
of
you
have
probably
heard
the
phrase
letter
of
intent,
which
is
typically
a
two-party
agreement.
A
memorandum
of
understanding
is
a
phrase
that's
used
for
multiple
parties.
This
was
signed
on
march
29th
2021
after
the
approval
at
the
council.
It
is
a
four-party
agreement.
G
It's
with
the
city
of
watertown,
signed
by
the
mayor,
the
watertown
development
company
signed
by
their
president
j.j
earthworks,
signed
by
mr
andrews
and
craig
development
signed
by
mr
craig
again,
a
public-private
partnership.
I
I
would
like
to
reiterate
to
everybody.
This
is
very
much
a
unique
agreement.
The
wdc
got
together
with
some
others
and
brought
this
forward
as
a
total
economic
type
of
plan
versus
just
a
one
building
plan.
It
was
a
to
develop
a
whole
area
that
could
really
increase
the
tax
base.
G
G
All
four
party
parties
sign
this
with
the
idea
that
this
is
the
plan,
we're
gonna
kind
of
work
with
and
move
forward,
so
it
does
allow
the
process
to
move
forward
false
upon
support
of
the
council.
The
mayor
in
this
medium
at
the
29th,
which
we
mentioned
earlier,
it
kind
of
reminded
me
of
one
of
the
wellness
center
committee
meetings
we
had
years
ago
when
you
could
see
the
community
rallying
around
it,
and
I
and
I
saw
that
happen
on
the
29th,
where
I
think
everybody
really
rallied
around
the
project.
G
The
fact
of
the
matter
is,
we
don't
know
what
the
costs
are
until
we
get
a
design,
get
an
architect
involved,
and
then
we
can
start
figuring
out
what
the
pro
the
product's
going
to
look
like,
and
then
we
can
start
figuring
out
costs,
but
rest
assured
those
of
us
on
the
council
and
the
citizens
involved.
We
are
very
concerned
about
where
the
costs
are
going
we're
watching
that
closely.
G
I
don't
know
where
that
mou
is
going
to
end
up.
We've
got
a
lot
of
steps
to
work
through,
but
we're
working
through
those
as
we
speak.
If,
in
the
end
that
financing
doesn't
work
out,
we
have
talked
with
our
finance
offer
kristen
about
bonding,
but
right
now
we're
going
to
follow
through
with
that
mou,
as
I
think
we
are
bound
to
do
in
terms
of
cost.
I
want
to
mention
two
more
things.
H
I'd
just
like
to
interject
a
little
bit
about
what
don
just
touched
on
to
two
points:
I'd
like
to
make
here
one
the
interest
rates
they
are
at
a
60-year
low.
Currently,
that's
why
we
can't
we.
We
can't
totally
discount
the
idea
of
going
out
bonding
for
this,
but
I
also
want
to
clarify
relative
to
the
bond.
These
are
sales
tax
revenue
bonds.
We
are
not
looking
at
issuing
a
general
obligation
bond
which
will
come
on
the
back
of
the
the
the
property
owners
in
in
the
community
or
the
county.
H
G
Okay,
thanks
glenn
two
points
about
the
budget,
though
you're
going
to
hear
from
dick
strasberg
in
a
little
bit,
but
he's
our
owner's
representative
and
we've
got
him
engaged
because
we
don't
have
all
the
in-house
expertise
to
build
a
facility
like
this.
So
dick's
going
to
be
somebody
that's
going
to
be
our
consultant,
he's
going
to
educate
us
he's
going
to
review
everything
we
get
involved
in
and
that's
what
his
company
does.
G
He
has
all
kinds
of
experts
he
can
rely
on,
so
we
elected
to
engage
with
tegra
group
and
again
dick
strasberg
as
our
owner's
representative.
I
just
want
to
mention
one
thing
about
again:
the
cost.
The
thing
that's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
focus
throughout
the
process
is
really
what's
called
value.
Engineering
and
again
dick
can
talk
about
this,
but
for
just
to
briefly
describe
it
really.
What
value
engineering
is?
Is
we
look
at
the
design
that
we're
given
and
we
can
tweak
that
design?
We
can
change
the
materials.
G
What
the
engineers
and
the
designers
try
to
do
is
to
extract
cost
out
of
the
equation
without
losing
functionality.
That's
really
a
big
area
of
focus
that
dick
and
working
with
the
developers
will
focus
upon
now.
A
couple
of
site
visits.
We've
been
on
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
glenn
because
he
made
both
of
those
trips.
H
Sure,
thanks
don
two
weeks
ago,
today,
councilman
bruce
buehler
and
myself
went
over
to
shockley
minnesota
and
met
dick
strasberg
at
that
facility,
and
then
the
next
day,
bruce
myself
and
don
you,
you
wrote
along
that
time
went
to
west
fargo,
north
dakota
again
met
with
along
with
dick
ours.
Our
visits
were
not
to
review
the
facility
itself,
necessarily
as
far
as
okay.
This
is
what
we
want
for
watertown.
That
was
not
the
purpose
of
it.
H
Our
purpose
was
to
talk
to
two
top-notch
architectural
firms
that
know
their
business
when
it
comes
to
designing
ice
facilities
we
want
to.
We
wanted
to
sound
them
out.
We
asked
a
lot
of
difficult
questions,
appreciate
dick
leading
the
charge
on
that.
Just
so
we
knew
you
know,
get
ourselves
a
little
more
familiar
with
what
what
some
of
the
things
that
we
need
to
be
aware
of
as
we
design
and
hopefully
build
this
at
some
point.
H
So
that's
that's
our
relationship
with
292
design,
group
glj,
architects,
the
west
fargo
firm
that
we
met
with
they're,
actually
the
ones
that
is
that
the
architects
involved
with
our
prairie
lakes
wellness
center,
so
they're
very
familiar
with
the
community.
With
the
you
know
the
climate
and
the
culture
down
here,
and
you
know
the
outstanding
architects.
We
came
away
from
both
those
visits.
You
know
feeling
very
good
about
you
know
if
this
would
be.
H
H
That
hey,
you
know,
they
understand
budget
constraints,
there's
ways
to
save
dollars,
still
get
the
same
functionality
and
use
for
what
we
for
what
we're
looking
at
same
thing,
that
was
done
at
the
wellness
center
when
glg,
when
jlg
was
involved
in
that
a
lot
of
value
engineering
that
saved
millions
of
dollars
on
that
facility,
and
yet
we
still
came
out
with
the
an
outstanding
facility
up
there.
But
again
purpose
of
our
visits
was
not
to
come
up
with
ideas
for
the
actual
facility.
G
G
Both
parties
want
to
know
that
the
other
party's
serious
about
doing
this
so
in
on
behalf
of
the
developers
and
such
they're
investing
money
into
the
project
right
now,
and
the
mou
gave
them
confidence
to
do
that.
The
fact
that
we
were
part
of
the
mou
gave
us
confidence
in
going
forward
to
make
these
trips
to
further
the
cause.
G
J,
j
and
the
city
shall
agree
upon
a
mutually
acceptable
alternative
location
in
the
development.
If
jnj
and
the
city
failed
to
identify
a
mutually
acceptable
alternative
location
in
the
development,
the
responsibilities
of
the
parties
under
this
memorandum
of
understanding
shall
cease.
So
we
do
want
to
address
that.
I
know
dick
will
touch
upon
a
little
bit
because
that's
the
question
we're
getting
and
it's
a
valid
question,
but
we
are
protected
within
the
mou
on
that
particular.
D
Can
I
add
something
on
that?
Just
real
quick
sure
I
just
want
to
stress
of
all
of
the
sites
that
we
considered
in
watertown,
every
single
site
had
some
soil
to
be
moved.
This
is
the
only
site
where
the
city
of
watertown
has
the
assurance
that
it
will
be
done
not
on
the
taxpayer
dime.
This
is
being
done
by
j
j
earthworks.
We
are
out
nothing
as
a
city
while
this
site
gets
prepared,
and
only
if
it
receives
our
full
and
complete
satisfaction.
Do
we
move
forward
with
this
location,
no
other
deal.
K
K
That's
right
down,
29
right
off
the
brand
to
exit
it's
great
to
be
here,
worked
on
the
wellness
center
and
I
was
you
know
we
come
back
here,
a
fair
amount,
so
I
it
wasn't
completely
new,
but
you
know
starting
to
work
and
just
seeing
what's
happening
in
this
city,
it's
amazing
and
then
to
come
back.
You
know
what
five
years
later
it
is.
It's
just
real
encouraging
to
see
what's
happening
here.
You've
got
just
just
a
just
a
great
great
city
and
a
great
place
to
live.
K
So
I
can
tell
you
just
a
little
bit
about
the
tegra
group,
some
of
you
know,
but
I'll
I'll,
just
kind
of
run
through
it.
First
I
met
architect
by
background.
I
went
to
ndsu
and
as
an
architect
I
saw
that
there
were
owners
that
had
their
act,
togethers
and
and
other
ones
that
just
didn't
have
their
act
together
and
it
was
a
lot
easier,
an
architect
to
work
with.
K
You
know,
a
knowledgeable
owner,
someone
who
knew
the
process,
someone
who
had
been
through
it
before
and
then
I
worked
for
a
developer
first
in
colorado,
springs
and
then
los
angeles
worked
on
very
large
projects,
and
I
realized
that
you
know
the
owner
needs
a
voice
to
make
sure
that
you
know
someone's
representing
the
owner
because
developers,
contractors
architects,
they
all.
They
know
their
business
as
well.
But
you
know,
let's
make
sure
that
the
one
who's
in
this
case
you
know
that-
would
be
the
tenant
on
it.
K
That's
ultimately
paying,
for
it
make
sure
they're
they've
got
a
voice,
so
we
started
tegra
25
years
ago
and
we
were
fortunate
to
work
on
a
lot
of
great
projects.
The
ones
that
are
notable
are
the
big
ones
like
target
field
or
target
center
alliance
field.
Those
kind
of
projects,
big
headquarter
kind
of
projects,
but
I'm
61-
and
I
I
did
the
sioux-
falls
event
center
and
when
I
did
that
I
psyched
man,
people
in
south
dakota
are
great.
K
I'm
going
to
finish
my
career
working
in
south
dakota,
and
that's
that's
exactly
what
I'm
doing
so.
We've
got
projects
ranging
from
you
know:
vermilion
we're
doing
rapid
city
event
center
right
now,
so
we
know
these
kind
of
projects.
Well,
we
know
ice,
you
know
hockey
and
you've
got
a
great.
I
love
the
structure
on
this
deal.
This
is
this
is
a
it's
a
unique
one,
maybe
to
watertown,
but
it's
not
completely
unique
to
how
other
cities
have
put
together
projects
and
it's
it
looks
like
you've
got.
You
know
a
good
process.
K
So
basically,
if
you
looked
at
our
role,
if
I
were
to
summarize
it
it's
to
say
that
we're
process
managers,
we
manage
the
process
and
we
keep
it
going
and
it's
a
little
bit.
You
know
an
analogy
might
be
like
a
jazz
band
because
jazz
band,
you
know,
there's
a
leader
in
a
jazz
band,
but
you
maybe
not
you
may
don't
know
who
it
is,
because
someone
will
do
their
little
gig
and
the
next
person
does
their
gig.
You
know,
but
there's
a.
I
K
And
that's
usually
what
our
role
is.
We,
if
anything,
we
might
be
the
drummer
making
sure
everything
keeps
moving.
Keeping
everybody
in
line,
get
keep
it
you'll
keep
the
tempo
of
it
going.
So
that's
what
we've
structured
the
firm
as
we've
got.
I
happen
to
be
an
architect
or
others
that
are
you
know,
construction,
background,
interior
design,
legal
property
management,
mostly
missing
accounting,
banking.
K
So
that's
what
our
company
is
just
on
a
third-party
basis
and
we're
fortunate
to
work
on
some
great
projects.
So
if
we
look
at
this
project
kind
of
at
the
beginning
of
it
I'll
just
run
through
the
process
that
we
would,
you
know
foresee
on
this
project
first,
you
got
a
good
start.
You've
got
a
minimum
of
understanding.
That's
that's
a
that's
an
accomplishment
to
get
to
that
and
to
you
know
all
the
things
it
takes
to
get
there.
K
But
if
I
had
a
white
board,
I'd
probably
take
the
a
handful
of
markers
and
I'd
hold
them
in
my
fist
and
I'd
go
up
and
I'd
start
scribbling
and
then,
as
I
moved
across
the
board
some
waves
and
then
ended
up
being
aligned
with
parallel
lines.
Well,
right
now,
you're
in
that
that
that
stage
where
the
roles
and
responsibilities
are
all
bumping
into
each
other,
and
it's
all
you
know
a
lot
of
agendas
trying
to
you
know
be
heard,
voices
to
be
heard
and
there's
still
a
lot
more
of
that
to
come
with.
K
I
happen
to
have
a
daughter
that
was
a
figure
skater.
You
know
and
got
up
real
early
in
the
morning
to
take
her
in
because
you
know
the
fight
for
ice
time
is
big
because
everybody
wants
that
same
sweet
time
at
the
morning
and
right
after
school.
So
there's
still
a
lot
of
that.
That's
got
to
be
worked
out,
but
I
think
the
thing
I'd
throw
out
there
after
being
through
this
process.
You
know,
I
can
say
many.
Many
many
times
is
there's
a
lot
of
the
there's.
K
K
But
if
we
look
at
this
project
I
mean
within
you
know
like
60
to
90
days.
It
should
start
to
be
kind
of
still
some
people,
some
things
bumping
into
each
other,
but
you
know
pretty
soon.
It'll
become
parallel
lines
where
the
roles
and
responsibilities
are
defined
and
understood,
and
right
now
is
a
it's
a
snarly
time
and
and
like
doing
the
site
due
diligence.
K
K
Now
you
can
make
decisions
now
you
can
say,
is
it
worth
a
million
dollars
more
to
have
x,
y
z
or
whatever
you
know,
whatever?
The
points
are
because
right
now
it's
it's
hard,
because
this
is
where
we
kind
of
bump
into
each
other.
It's
like
I
want
this.
I
want
that
and
that's
typical,
but
once
you
start
getting
dollars
on
it,
then
you
can
start
making.
K
K
Now
you
can
make
decisions,
so
the
process
is,
you
know
you
get
the
architect
hired
and
then
you
know,
do
the
the
community
input
and
I'm
very
big
on
tours,
because
on
target
field,
when
I
sat
with
the
owners
of
target
field,
they
decided
they
wanted
to
have
a
local
owner's
rep
and
I
told
them
I've
never
done
a
baseball
stadium.
I
I'm,
I
told
the
wrong
guy
because
I
didn't
think
I
could
do
it
and
they
wanted
somebody
local,
so
kind
of
agreed
to
him.
K
But
I
said
we
got
to
be
able
to
go
study
these
other
facilities.
So
we
did.
We
there's
30
major
league
baseball
facilities
and
we've
studied
most
of
them,
went
to
most
of
them
and
and
really
really
got
into
the
details
on
it.
Just
the
real
like
real
details
on
it
on
how
you
do
these
things
and
and
then
also
with
that
one
of
the
big
advantages
of
doing
these
tours,
you
get
to
know
the
people
who
are
running
them
so
now.
You've
got
this
whole
cast
of
characters.
K
You
call
when
you're
making
decisions
and
you're
you're.
You
know
like
take
the
ice
system
you'll
be
dealing
with
here.
You
know,
let's
talk
to
people
who
have
had
it
for
five
ten
years
and
see
how
it
works,
and
so
now
you
get
this
whole
network.
When
you
start
to
talk
to
these
other
people-
and
you
start
getting
some
real
good
input
on
it
and
the
reason
target
field
got
voted.
As
you
know,
the
top
professional
sports
venue,
I'm
convinced,
is
because
we
just
went
and
went
around
and
learned
and
didn't
make
the
same
mistakes.
K
Everybody
else
did
because
and
plus
everybody
wants
to
help
you,
especially
when
you're
a
city
like
this
doing
this
all
the
other
cities
they
want
to
help.
So
that's
part
of
the
process
get
out
there
and
learn
from
others,
learn
the
mistake
and
and
have
it
something
where
there's
you
know,
people
that
are
the
hockey
people
involved
and
you
know,
get
to
get
people
involved
that
are
that
really
understand
these
things
and
then
come
to
decisions.
K
So
our
job
is
to
manage
the
process
and
to
to
guide
you
through
it,
and
we've
we've
done
this
now
for
25
years.
We
have
not
had
one
over
budget.
Yet
that's
why
I
got
gray
hair.
I
think-
and
I
think
that,
but
you
know
if
you
manage
the
process
and
do
you
know
carefully,
consider
it
that's
achievable
the
caveat.
I
say
on
that
right
now,
in
35
years
of
doing
this,
I've
never
seen
cost
escalation
in
construction
like
we
got
right
now.
K
What
we're
seeing
in
steel,
it's
it's
nuts!
It's!
We
had
one
project,
for
example,
that
we
bought
out
the
steel
in
in
december
at
1900
a
ton,
and
we
have
another
one
that
was
at
forty
three
hundred
dollars
a
ton
recently
and
we've
got
one
priced
up
right
now,
where
they
were
talking
about
seventy
two
hundred
a
ton
so
we're
in
some
hyper
inflation
right
now
it
will
likely
level
out
by
the
time
this
gets
built.
K
I
think
you
see
it
in
home
building,
you
know
the
cost
of
lumber
and
it's
just
a
real
unsettled
time
right
now,
but
also
the
thing
that
is
a
counterbalance
to
that
is
the
low
interest
rates,
because
it's
a
I
was
born
in
59.
That's
the
last
time.
1959
to
the
last
time
we
saw
interest
rates
that
are
where
they're
at
right
now,
so
that's
just
a
quick
overview
on
it
and
we
can
talk
more
specifics
on
it.
K
The
process
is,
I
just
want
to
touch
on
the
soil
thing,
because
I
know
that's
something.
That's
being
discussed
is
first,
there's
a
soils
report
that
was
completed
and
I
met
with
jesse
and
jamie
and
mark
this
afternoon
and
just
just
discussed
it
didn't
get
into
the
details
on
it,
but
what
I
want
to
know
is
who
did
it
and
at
first
it
was
a
et
very
reputable
firm.
K
K
I
just
use
them
on
on
on
the
headquarters
for
thrivent,
I
mean
they're
they're,
a
very
solid
firm,
so
we
we
trust
that
report
and
the
questions
I
asked.
You
know
the
landowner.
I
said
so
tell
me
about
this,
so
it's
a
gravel
pit,
so
is
there
phil,
and
the
answer
is
of
course,
there's
fill
in
every
gravel
pit,
we've
developed
and-
and
that's
not
unusual
and
where's
the
water
table
at
so.
We
know
those
two
things.
Well,
the
fill
the
fill
on
this
site.
K
It's
got
to
be
taken
out,
so
I
go
to
the
mou
and
fortunately,
whoever
negotiated
it
did
a
good
job.
It's
the
land
owner,
that's
responsible
for
bringing
that
back
up
to
an
engineered
fill
they
have
to
have
engineered
phil
and
aet
would
be
the
one
testing
it.
They
tested
every
foot
that
comes
back
up
and
that's
very
typical.
It's
not
unusual
to
have,
you
know
soil,
that
is,
that
needs
to
be
removed
and
and
brought
in
with
engineered
fill
it's
a
little
unusual
to
have
this
much
of
it.
K
But
this
is
a
gravel
bit.
So
that's
not
unusual,
but
it's
there's
film
material,
that's
nearby
and
the
way
you
negotiate
the
development
agreement
or
the
mou
for
the
development
agreement
is
that
that
it
would
be
on
the
responsibility
of
the
land
seller
to
bring
it
up
to
an
engineered
fill
level
and
then
also
on
the
on
the
floodplain.
K
You
know
their
their
neck
on
the
line
on
it,
they're
going
to
make
it
right
they
have
to
and
and
and
when
we're
involved
they
they
know
they're
I'd
say
they
absolutely
have
to,
because
we
know
this.
We
know
we
know
what's
involved
with
it
and
the
fact
you
got
an
aet
on
the
soils
issue.
I
think
that
that
relieves
my
concerns
on
it
that
it
will
get
brought.
K
It
will
be
corrected
to
what's
what's
needed
and
also
knowing
that
the
engineers
I
personally
know
the
engineers
that
both
of
these
firms
are
have
proposed
and
they're
conservative
they're
going
to
sign
off
on
anything
unless
they've
got
the
compaction
reports
and
everything
tested
from
from
aet.
So
that's
my
perspective
on
soils.
K
I
think
the
next
process,
then
is
to
you
know,
is
to
make
the
architect
selection
if
they
get
back
to
us
with
their
their
fees
and
some
of
the
things
we've
asked
them
for
and
then
start
letting
them
dig
in
and
start
getting
the
you
know
the
community
input
and
and
and
and
drill
into
the
process.
So
that's
my
my
perspective
on
it.
I
could
talk
all
day
and
I
love
this
stuff
but
I'll
I'll,
hush
up
and
ask
if
you've
got
any
questions
or
got
to
go
from
there.
I
K
What
we'd
recommend
on
that
and
we've
done
this
on
with
quite
a
few
cities,
is
have
a
hydrologist
look
at
the
big
picture.
Look
at
the
big
picture
and
see
where
this
goes,
because
it's
all
that's
all
something
they
can
calculate
and
we've
got
some
firms
that
specifically
do
that
we'd
recommend
they
use
their
real
big
studies
to
do
it,
but
you
know
have
have
a
you
know,
usually
they're
the
phd
types
that
they
are
hydrologists
and
that's
all
they
do.
This
is
what
we
just
just
dealt
with
it
in
in
sioux
falls.
K
I
Just
do
these
have
to
be
directed
here.
Can
we
ask
questions
just
of
the
committee
out
of
curiosity,
okay
and
again,
everyone's
in
full
support
of
the
ice
rink,
I'm
just
reflecting
these
for
other
people,
but
there's
questions
right
now
on
where
we're
at
for
budgeting
management,
operations,
maintenance
and
promotion.
Could
you
guys
talk
on
that
at
all?
Are
we
at
that
point?
Are
we
still
kind
of
in
infancy
point
and
it's
okay?
If
that's
the
answer
right
now,.
G
G
I'd
love
to
say
this
is
what
it's
going
to
cost
and
if
it's
too
much
we're
not
going
to
vote
for
it.
That's
really
what's
going
to
happen,
but
we
don't
know
yet-
and
I
think
our
hope,
of
course,
is
with
the
value
engineering
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
m
change
the
design
to
the
point
that
we
can
afford
the
functionality.
We
want
that's
impossible
to
predict
mike
I've
heard
numbers
over
20
million
and
I'm
sure
you
guys
have
heard
those
too.
K
Yeah
the
process
we
like
to
go
through
on
that
is
start
out
with
a
concept
design
and
the
concept
may
have
you
know
four
or
five
different
different
ideas
and
what
we
saw
even
in
west
fargo
and
shakopee.
We
saw
one
design
that
had
the
second
level
was
really
a
viewing
deck
that
went
so
the
the
seats
were
top
loaded.
K
You
know
the
goal
is
you
you
want
to
at
least
let's
understand
what
it
is
to
do
it
absolutely
right,
and
if
we
can't
afford
it,
we
got
to
make
compromises
from
that,
but
start
out
with
doing
it
right.
Because,
then,
you
know
you
go
into
eyes
wide,
open
and
and
start
pulling
the
prices
down.
One
of
the
ways
that
we
get
these
projects
in
on
budget.
We
have
a
pricing.
You
know
we
recommend
the
construction
manager
at
risk
and
south
dakota
has
a
is
from
a
legal
perspective.
K
It's
it's
great
because
you
can
hire
the
construction
manager
right
away
and
have
them
help
with
the
pricing
get
their
subcontractors
in
help
them
understand
how
they
can
save
money,
because
some
of
the
subs
are
you
know,
there's
some
pretty
pretty
smart
people
that
are
subcontractors
and
they've
seen
what
works
and
what
doesn't
work.
So
we
try
and
get
all
this
input
in
so
that
way,
you're
making
the
decisions
kind
of
you
kind
of
you
look
at
a
big
picture
and
organize
it.
You
know
on
the
different
different
types,
different
layouts,
different
structural
system.
K
Is
this
going
to
be
pre-engineered
building,
or
is
it
going
to
be
a
bar
joist
and
someone
even
threw
out
that
wood?
Because
right
now,
there's-
and
I'm
not
sure
about
that-
I
haven't
done
one
in
wood,
but
in
t
south
dakota
there's
this
grunwald,
which
is
a
contractor,
for
example.
That
could
be
a
potential
that
they
do
with
these
long
span,
dairy
barns
and
you
know-
and
they
do
it-
it's
not.
You
don't
have
to
have
wood.
That
is
the
you
know
the
highest
quality
wood,
because
it's
all
glue
laminate
glue,
lamb
beams.
K
You
know
so
I
don't
know,
there's
things
to
look
at
on
that,
but
that's
that
early
stage,
where
you
start
looking
at
those
big
picture
things,
then
you
start
building
a
cost
model.
It's
not
an
estimate,
it's
really
just
a
cost
model
and
you
start
building
up
on
that
and
start
looking
at
the
options
and-
and
you
know
it's
really
really
starting
to
get
into
it,
because
one
of
the
things
you've
got
on
the
variable
here.
K
That's
a
big
one
is
the
lobby
and
you
think
how
big
a
deal
is:
a
lobby
well,
the
two
that
we
saw
are
probably
the
most
extreme
that
I've
seen.
We've
got
west
fargo,
which
has
a
very
small
lobby
because
it
got
value
engineered
down.
The
one
we
looked
at
in
shakopee
has
a
very
big
lobby
and
when
you've
got
tournaments,
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
people
coming
having
a
lot
big
lobbies,
nice,
but
it's
a
variable
and
it's
it's.
You
know
it's
it's
got
to
be.
K
You
got
to
be
able
to
afford
a
big
lobby,
something
we
try
and
do,
though,
on
these
things
is,
if
you
think
about
it,
like
with
a
car,
you
can
buy
a
base
model
car,
it's
got
the
wheels
the
seats,
the
engine
you
can
drive
it
down
the
road
it
works,
it
doesn't
have.
The
leather
seats
doesn't
have
all
the
options
on
it,
but
you
know
it's
still
a
car.
If
we
can
bring
it
down
to
that
level
and
establishing
what
that
base
model
is,
then
we
can
start
talking
about
it.
K
You
know
about
having
you
know
a
dry
training
room
or
having
all
these
different
nice
to
haves.
Then
it's
a
little
easier
to
make
it
once
you
realize
this
is
what
we
this
is.
The
minimum
we've
got
to
spend
to
do
it
and
how
does
that?
How
do
the
numbers
look
on
that?
As
far
as
being
able
to
afford
the
lease
payments
on
something
like
that.
I
Sorry
I
came
with
a
list
so
speaking
of
the
wellness
center,
this
is
kind
of
one
of
the
confidence
things
that
we're
trying
to
build
with
the
public,
but
in
the
situation
that
we
had
with
the
wellness
center,
when
we
did
a
little
bit
of
value
engineering
there,
we
currently
have
an
issue
with
the
bleachers
in
the
building,
and
I
don't
know
if
we
could
talk
on
that
and
how?
Maybe
we
can
avoid
a
situation
like
that.
K
You
know,
I
think,
if
we
look
at
every
project,
you
end
up
with
a
whole
list
of
things
that
that
you
make
compromises
on
and
it's
all
it's
just
like
building
your
house.
You
know
you
want
hardwood
floors
everywhere
or
do
you
put?
You
know,
lower
cost
carpet
places
you
know.
So
it's
all
it's
a
choice
you
go
through
and
the
thing
that
our
role
is
isn't
to
make
the
decisions.
K
Our
role
is
to
make
sure
you
can
make
informed
decisions
saying
this
is
what
it
costs
to
do
versus
option
a
versus
option
b
and
then
and
try
and
get
it
so
you've
got
all
the
information
out
there
and,
and
then,
and
also
the
thing
we
really
push
on
is
with
the
relationships
we
have
within.
You
know
that,
with
the
operators
of
other
facilities,
we
get
talk
to
them
because
they'll
tell
us
what
the
problems
are.
K
So
you
know
what
the
problems
are
before
you
make
the
decision,
then
there's
things
you've
got
to
do
and
you
do
on
every
project
where
you
know
this
thing
would
be.
I
don't
know
25
30
million.
If
you
got
everything
you
wanted
so
you're
making
compromises
and
just
make
sure
they're
informed,
so
I
think
that's
the
thing
to
do
is
make
sure
you've
got.
So
if
there
is
something
that's
going
to
be
a
problem
potential
problem.
K
Okay,
we
cut
back
on
it.
We
didn't
put
the
glass
wall
in
between
the
two
pools.
It
was
a
conscious
decision
and
that
means
that
the
two
pools
have
to
be
closer
to
the
same
temperature,
which
we
can
tell
you
up
front.
We
did
back
then,
and
it
was,
but
there
wasn't
the
dollars
to
put
it
in,
and
that
was
you
know
the
the
people
that
are
training
in
the
in
in
the
lap
swimming
they
want
it
colder,
but
the
mom
with
a
little
toddler.
K
You
know
she
wants
about
like
the
bathtub,
but
you
can't
keep
both
both
of
those
happy.
You
get
you
know
and
then,
if
you
start
to
keep
the
water
temperature,
you
know
that
far
apart
you're
going
to
have
humidity
problems,
you're
going
to
have
problems
in
the
building,
so
then
you
try
and
bring
the
temperatures
together
and
you'll
make
that,
but
that's
an
example
of
a
compromise
and
that's
what
you
hope
you
can
build
this
thing
and
just
kind
of
do
it
all
right
right.
K
You
know
so,
then
you
start
pulling
it
down
a
little
bit,
but
what
the
goal
is,
is
you
have
a
pro
a
building
that
you
build
it
and
you
don't
have
to
dump
more
money
in
it
in
the
future,
because
it's
hard
enough
to
have
the
money
you
know
come
in
up
front
and
to
pull
this
all
together
and
get
the
lease
payments
and
get
everything
you
can
afford.
It's
another
thing
if
you
got
to
spend
a
million
dollars
later,
so
the
goal
is
to
try
and
you
know,
really
make
a
high
quality
facility
here.
I
Okay,
I
think
some
of
what
I
was
trying
to
just
point
to
is
that
when
we
did
that
they
became
non-functional,
it's
not
so
much.
The
compromise
compromises
are
going
to
happen
and
that's
100
acceptable.
That's
part
of
the
process,
it's
just
if
there's
safeguards
in
that,
as
we
go
forward
to
make
sure
everything
is
functional,
and
I
know
you
guys
are
doing
your
due
diligence
on
it.
I
just
want
it
on
our
radar
a
little
bit
to
be
careful
of
those.
So
we
don't
repeat
some
of
our
mistakes
that
we've
unfortunately
made.
K
And
that's
the
thing
you
learn
when
you
get
when
you
go
to
all
these
other
facilities.
I
do
have
to
throw
out
one
comment
on
the
the
wellness
center,
though
it's
the
envy
of
most
communities
one.
Is
it
operated
in
the
black
that
is
not
typical
and
you've
got
a
there
we're
working
with
another
community
if
they
could
afford
to
build
exactly
what
you
built?
They
build
it
even
with
the
problems
it's
like.
It
is
a
it's
a
very
well
within
the
facilities
like
that.
It's
a
very,
very
highly
acclaimed
facility.
I
L
L
Now
that
gets
a
little
bit
off
topic,
because
I'm
talking
about
the
subdivision
as
a
whole,
not
specifically
just
the
ice
arena
location
and
that
report
for
the
public
rights
of
way
where
utilities
and
roads
were
will
be
built,
is
in
the
works
as
we
speak
by
the
same
consulting
firm
that
dick
has
indicated.
American
engineering
testing,
I
believe,
out
of
sioux,
falls
again
well-renowned
geotech
firm
that
I'm
sure
will
do
a
great
job
and
provide
some
good,
accurate
information
for
us
to
assess
and
see
what
kind
of
soil
conditions
exist.
L
With
that
right
away
soil
report,
we
are
also
going
to
be
receiving
pavement
recommendations
from
that
geotech
engineer,
which
is
a
typical
practice
for
geotext
to
provide
based
on
their
soil,
bore
findings,
and
I,
in
communications,
with
the
developer,
jamie
andrews
for
again
the
entire
subdivision
that
helps
safeguard
his
engineers
design.
It
double
checks
his
engineers
design.
It
gives
city
staff
something
to
check
it
off
against,
and
then
we
use
our
own
professional
judgment
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
the
right
types
of
roads
being
designed
and
built
in
this
particular
type
of
an
instance.
L
As
far
as
the
soyuz
report
for
the
the
structure
location,
the
proposed
location
for
the
ice
facility,
yes,
I
would
anticipate
getting
that
at
some
point
down
the
road
here
too,
from
a
regulatory
standpoint.
As
far
as
staff
is
concerned,
that
could
come
as
late
as
is
really
as
late
as
a
building
permit
time
frame.
As
far
as
staff
is
concerned,
we
would
want
to
see
that
we
would
want
to
have
it
checked
off
I'd,
imagine
being
plugged
in
at
some
point.
A
Right
because
the
mou
says,
the
city
will
be
furnished
with
the
structural
engineers
recommendation
for
or
whatever
from
the
soil
borings
correct,
and
so
we
expect
to
see
that.
But
we
think
that
some
people
have
seen
it
because
it
councilman
vilhauer
was
quoted
in
the
paper.
As
saying
it
looks
good
structural,
structurally,
sound.
H
I'll
I'll
address
that
comment
mayor
when
the
public
opinion
reached
out
to
me
roughly
three
weeks
ago.
I
I
had
not
seen
it,
but
our
committee
had
reached
out
to
the
developer
and
got
the
the
the
the
comment
that
at
that
point
there
was
no
problems
for
seeing
with
the
boring.
So
I
we
have
not
seen
it
other
than
what
you've
referred
to
now
dick,
but
that's
what
we're
going
up
on
was
the
representation
that
we
got
from
the
developer
when
the
prior
to
the
public
opinion
reaching
out
to
me.
A
A
So
there's
no
bonding
required,
but
nobody
thinks
it's
going
to
be
14
million
after
talking
to
the
292
and
jlg
architects,
we're
thinking
it's
significantly
more
than
that,
but
the
mouse
does
say
14
million.
So
the
basic
premise
of
the
mou
can't
be
met
and
I
don't
think
that
that
should
be
glossed
over.
A
We
want
the
information
to
be
factored
in
so
that
we
get
the
right
product,
a
sustainable
product
that
isn't
going
to
flood
and
the
the
city
can
afford
to
maintain
going
forward
in
the
future,
and
so
that
that's
what
I'm
concerned
about
is
I
don't
want.
We
don't
have
room
to
subsidize
a
couple
hundred
thousand
dollars
towards
a
beautiful
new
facility.
No
matter
how
beautiful
it
is,
we
just
don't
have
a
couple
extra
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
subsidize.
A
So
that's
important
information
to
know-
and
I
guess
what
I'm
hearing
from
you
dick
and
I
do
trust
you.
I
think
our
wellness
center
turned
out
great,
it's
fantastic.
It's
an
amenity
worth
moving
to
watertown
for,
and
I
want
the
ice
arena
to
be
that
as
well,
and
we
need
to
go
through
the
proper
steps
to
make
sure
that
we're
making
the
right
decisions.
We
don't
want
to
cut
the
wrong
corners
when
it
comes
time.
So
I'm
not
too
concerned
about.
K
A
So
then,
I
feel
better
yeah,
because
I
I
know
that
it's
that
I
don't
need
to
see
the
soil
report
right.
If
we're
removing
it
right,
then
it
doesn't
matter,
but
I'm
glad
you're
on
board.
I
think
that's
going
to
help
us
get
the
facility
that
everybody
wants
and
one
that
will
earn
us
money
like
the
wellness
center
does
yep
councilman
lalum.
B
The
mou
that
was
put
in
place
on
that
is
essentially
it's
a
safeguard
for
all
parties
involved,
financially
speaking.
If
it
gets
to
the
point
where
it's
something
that
the
city
can't
afford,
we
either
have
to
go
back
and
come
up
with
either
additional
funding
through
outside
sources
or
through
you
know.
B
If
we
have
to
bond,
we
have
to
bond
and
at
the
end
of
the
day
I
mean
we're
going
to
have
to
go
through
the
same
process,
no
matter
what
we
got
to
figure
out,
what
we
want
for
a
building,
how
it's
going
to
function
and
then
have
to
come
up
with
some
pricing
at
the
end
of
that
report,
either
way.
So
whether
that
is
through
the
mou
or
we
end
up,
you
know
not
using
mou
and
having
to
bond
it
separately.
I
mean
that's
something
we
have
to
decide
as
a
community.
B
What
we
want
to
do
with
it.
So
I
mean
we
can
throw
out
numbers
whatever
you,
you
know
I've.
I
saw
22
million.
I
think
in
the
paper
that
I
don't
know
where
that
number
came
from,
I
haven't
been
told:
22
million
dollars,
I've
seen
12
million
I've
seen
14
million-
I
mean
I
don't
know,
I
would
assume
it's
somewhere
between
there.
I
mean
we
could
say
30
million
if
we
really
wanted
to
doesn't
mean
it's
going
to
come
in
at
30
million
dollars.
B
You
know
we're
talking
about
potentially
bonding
that
and
using
money
from
second
penny
sales
tax,
which
comes
in
from
not
just
people
that
are
from
watertown,
but
people
outside
of
watertown.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
to
decide
what
we
can
afford,
what
it's
going
to
be
and
how
it's
going
to
work
for
years
to
come,
I
mean
that's
the
thing
that
we've
talked
about
as
an
ice
community
is.
B
This
is
a
this
is
a
50-year
facility
or
longer
I
mean
you,
don't
typically
get
to
build
an
ice
rink
every
five
to
ten
years.
Obviously,
as
we've
been
trying
to
do
this
for
the
last
20,
you
know
this
is
something
that
has
to
be
done
right,
so,
whether
that's
14
million
or
it
pushes
close
to
the
22
million
dollars
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
to
do
what's
right
for
our
community
and,
if
that's
to
spend
additional
money,
that's
to
spend
additional
money.
B
If
it's
fundraise
additional
money,
then
that's
what
we
need
to
do.
So
the
mou
is
supposed
to
help
us
get
to
that
point
and
move
forward.
So
I
mean
we
can
pick
it
apart.
All
we
want
to,
but
we
haven't
even
got
to
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
a
facility,
yet
as
to
whether
that
mou
is
going
to
work
for
all
parties
involved
and
it
needs
to
work
for
all
parties
involved,
not
just
the
city.
K
So
I
would
I'd
second
that,
in
terms
of
the
process,
something
we'll
set
up
with
the
architect
contract
is
is
do
it
in
steps
get
through
the
concept
design
get
some.
You
know
some
pricing
and
then
you'll
have
a
better
idea
and
then
get
through
schematic
design,
do
pricing
and
have
it.
So
we
can
stop
at
any
point,
because
these
projects
have
a
way
of
to
start
with
it's
that
snarly
stage
we're
in
right.
K
Now
everybody
bumps
into
everybody
and
all
that,
then
you
know
once
it
starts
to
get
real
numbers
on
saying
this
is
what
it
is
and
we'll
start
it'll
start
coming
down
to
a
range
that
the
range
is
14
to
16
or
18
to
20,
whatever
whatever
it
is,
and
you
can
go
very
inexpensive
on
these
facilities.
You
can
you
can
you
can
make
them?
You
know
so,
they're.
J
K
I
think
that
should
be
if
we,
if
we
were
to
go
and
just
if
this
thing
is
full
steam
ahead,
then
I
would
say
it's
probably
within
the
next
60
to
90
days.
You,
you
start
talking
to
people
on
that
and
there's
a
lot
of
approaches.
There's
management
companies
that
come
in
that
will
sort
of
coach
along
the
city.
K
There's
other
ones,
that'll,
take
it
over
completely
and
take
you
know,
for
example,
the
ymca
is
an
example
of
a
is
of
someone
that
managed
them
would
manage
like
a
wellness
center
they
take
over
and
they
they
run
it
and
they
take
the
financial
responsibility
on
it.
So
you've
got
models
like
that
and
you've
got
other
ones
where
you
just
hire
them
as
a
manager,
but
I
think
that's
we
like
bringing
them
in
early
on
because
they
usually
get
a
lot
of
experience
on
these
things
and
they
can
it's
all
about.
How
do
you?
H
I
just
like
to
touch
on
something
that
that
adam
just
said:
this
is
a
community
decision.
Yes,
the
10
of
us
represent
the
community,
but
but
but
we're
not
the
end
all
and
be
all.
In
this
discussion
I
mean,
if
we
make
a
decision
based
upon
the
information
that
we
have,
that
the
community
is
not
like.
H
This
is
not
taking
out
the
hands
of
the
people,
that
is,
that
can
be
referred
to
a
vote,
and-
and
I
I
would
welcome
that,
we
had
the
same
situation-
help
the
wellness
center
and
the
the
the
the
vote
was
overwhelmingly
in
support.
I
sense
would
be
the
same
way
with
the
ice
facility
if
it
got
that,
but
that
is
the
people's
prerogative
to
challenge
any
decision
that
we
might
make
along
the
way.
I
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear
again,
I
don't
think
anyone's
trying
to
pick
it
apart.
I
don't
think
that's
the
point
of
the
questions.
It's
really
just
trying
to
get
some
answers
for
some
people
that
have
been
asking
questions.
It's
it's
not
meant
to
poo,
poo
it
or
bring
it
down
or
anything
like
that.
I
think
it's
just
bringing
us
a
little
more
clarity.
That's
all
because
a
few
people
in
the
community
feel
like
they've,
just
been
kind
of
in
the
dark,
and
I
know
it's
just
part
of
the
process
at
this
point.
I
You
know
and
I'm
curious
are
there
mechanisms
where
we
can
use
a
tiff
and
then
bond
on
top
of
that
rapid
city,
your
mark
or
your
black
excuse
me
earmarked
two
percent
on
their
sales
tax,
specifically
on
liquor
and
restaurant
sales,
that
they
put
directly
towards
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
rushmore
plaza
like
there's
a
lot
of
creative
solutions
to
it.
I
hope
we
don't
have
to
do
an
additional
tax,
but
I'm
just
saying
there's
options
out
there
to
make
it
happen.
I
think
we
all
want
to
see
it
too,
so.
B
B
To
councilman
hoyer's
point
there,
I
think
you'd
have
to
look
at
all
options
depending
on
what
the
price
take
comes
in.
At
I
mean,
if
you
really
want
to
do
the
right
facility,
you
have
to
figure
out
what
you're
willing
to
sacrifice
as
a
community
is.
That
is
a
certain
portion
of
your
tax.
You
know
that
comes
in.
B
You
know
I
mean
come
ask
you
know
we
hired
dick
after
a
meeting
with
him,
so
he
could
help
us
work
through
those
problems
as
a
community.
We
don't
want
to
have
those
issues
going
forward
and
it's
nothing
against
j,
j,
earthworks
or
or
craig
development.
Either.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
our
community
is
protected,
that
we
can
have
the
best
facility
that
we
can
for
what
we
can
afford
to
build
plain
and
simple
hi
beth.
Are
you
waving?
C
Who've
talked
to
us,
so
I
don't.
I
want
to
make
sure
we
continue
to
do
this
because
sometimes
it's
not
a
matter
of
them
coming
to
us,
it's
them
not
knowing
what
to
ask
and
then
we
answer
their
questions
by
things
doing
things
like
this,
so
so
this
is
a
good
process
that
we're
going
through
right
now.
So
I
think
this
is
really
important
that
there's
the
give
and
take
so
councilman.
A
G
If
I
may,
I
have
a
question
for
heath
if
I
could
maybe
just
explain
where
we're
at
behind
the
scenes
at
the
city,
because
we
just
approved
the
plat
at
the
planning
commission,
because
that's
the
question
I'm
getting
what's
the
process
internally,
that
goes
forward
at
this
point.
Could
you
maybe
just
update
us
on
that.
L
L
L
Every
development
agreement
sometimes
has
a
few
little
nuances
to
it
and
some
uniqueness
to
it,
depending
on
what's
going
on
this
one
very
well,
may
have
that,
but
that
is
being
drafted
as
we
speak,
so
that
platt
was
slated
to
go
on
the
agenda
for
tonight's
council
meeting
for
council's
approval,
but
we
were
missing
the
final
draft
of
that
development
agreement.
Along
with
that
soils
report
that
I
referenced
earlier
for
the
public
rights
of
way.
L
I
needed
those
two
documents
before
staff
could
bring
that
platform
to
council
for
their
consideration.
So
we
are
on
track
to
see
that
information
given
to
us
in
in
amount
of
time
where
it's
reviewable
before
the
june
21st
council
meeting.
So
we're
anticipating,
seeing
that
plat
before
council
on
june
21st
once
that
plat
and
development
agreement
are
approved
and
the
construction
plans
have
all
the
information
we
need
for
them.
L
The
developer
is
able
to
go
and
construct
a
way
as
far
as
the
public
infrastructure
is
concerned
and
at
a
certain
point
in
the
construction
process,
they're
also
available
as
able
to
start
pulling
building
permits
on
those
platted
lots,
and
so
that's
in
a
in
a
rough
cap
of
what
the
subdivision
process
looks
like
and
where
we're
at
in
this
one
in
particular,
you
know
as
far
as
the
ice
arena
process.
I
just
add
this
too.
Just
for
the
community's
level
of
comfort.
I
myself
personally
am
no
stranger
to
projects
like
this.
L
I
came
from
a
community
that
had
a
lot
of
structural
development.
We
had
a
lot
of
joint
projects,
mainly
with
public
agencies
like
the
county
and
the
the
college
that
was
in
our
community,
but
we
built
student
housing
and
a
partnership
with
the
technical
college.
In
my
last
job,
I
was
at
we
built
a
new
fire
station
in
collaboration
with
the
county.
In
that
same
community
we
had
an
eight
million
dollar
outdoor
softball
complex,
a
very
elaborate
well
put
together
project.
L
All
those
three
projects
were
ran
a
cmar
process,
a
construction
manager
at
risk,
so
bringing
dick
on
board
with
the
tegra
group
has
been
a
very
it's
brought
high
level
comfort
to
me
to
have
that
in
my
last
place
of
appointment,
I
had
five
licensed
engineers
working
under
me.
I
don't
have
that
here,
so
bringing
a
consultant
on
with
this
level
of
knowledge.
L
I
have
not
been
part
of
target
field
project
dick
has
been
so
he
brings
all
the
more
to
this
team
to
help
ensure
that
this
thing
goes
right.
So
all
I
wanted
to
stress
was
not
only
through
our
consultant,
but
also
through
staff
experience
we're
going
to
do
everything
we
need
to
do
as
staff
to
make
sure
that
this
thing
is
being
checked
off
each
step
of
the
way,
make
sure
that
the
regulations
are
followed,
that
things
are
safeguarded
and
designed
in
an
appropriate
manner.
L
D
Thank
you
knowing
that
the
presentation
is
almost
over,
but
I
did
want
to
stress
a
couple
different
things
that
were
part
of
the
debate,
but
nobody
to
my
knowledge
has
prematurely
declared
success
on
this
project,
even
in
that
march
29th
meeting,
I
don't
think
I
ever
said
this
is
over.
I
said
what
we'd
have
is
a
memorandum
of
understanding
to
move
forward
to
find
success.
D
So,
but
I
do
know
one
thing
that
to
attack
it
from
a
different
point
of
view
to
attack
the
facility
to
just
unduly
place
a
tax
on.
It
is
a
certain
recipe
for
failure,
so
I
would
encourage
people
to
try
to
find
success,
but
I
do
want
to
address
two
things
with
the
soil
with
anyone
who
has
legitimate
questions
for
the
soil,
both
dick
and
jamie,
and
while
dick
and
jamie
andrews
and
jessie
craig
are
all
here
they
can
address
that
issue.
D
Yes,
the
material
costs
are
going
up,
but
if
history
proves
us,
one
thing
with
hockey
with
an
ice
arena
in
watertown
is
the
cost
is
never
going
to
get
cheaper
than
what
it
is
today.
There's
an
old
saying
that
the
best
time
to
plant
a
tree
is
10
years
ago.
The
next
best
time
is
today.
I
would
liken
that
to
the
ice
arena
in
watertown.
D
Yes,
we
could
have
done
this
years
ago.
We
didn't,
but
what
we
do
is
we
have
an
opportunity
to
do
it
now.
So
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
be
part
of
the
solution
to
move
this
forward
and
if
you
have
any
legitimate
questions,
rather
than
attack
this
facility
and
burden
it
with
undue
expectations
that
not
only
possibly
derails
it
from
completion,
but
also
then
burdens
it
with
a
negative
public
stigma
going
forward,
that's
unfair
to
the
community.
So
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
do
ask
them
now.
A
Thank
you
and
when
I
asked
you
in
my
office
the
questions
you
told
me
you
couldn't
answer
because
you
had
stepped
down
from
your
leadership
role
and
you
know
it
depends
on
who
you
ask.
That's
that's
the
answer
you
gave
me.
I
was
asking
you
and
you
didn't
give
me
answers,
but
if
now
you're
saying
you're
going
to
give
answers,
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
ask
the
committee
and
also
please
include
the
professional
staff
members
in
the
committee
from
here
on
out.
We
have
an
engineer
on
our
staff.
He
should
be.
A
He
can
be
very
helpful,
he's
very
knowledgeable
in
project
management,
so
I
I
would
feel
much
better
knowing
that
he's
included
in
the
meetings,
not
just
included
by
asking
him
questions
here
and
there,
but
he's
part
of
the
process.
The
attorney
I'd.
Please
include
the
attorney
and
please
include
the
finance
officer
and
the
park
and
rec
director
and
I'll
feel
a
lot
better.
A
Knowing
that
there
there
is
a
support
group
available
and-
and
I
am
you
know-
extremely
happy
that
we've
hired
dick-
I
that
does
take
away
a
lot
of
the
fears
knowing
that
that
he's
going
to
insist
that
we
follow
the
due
process
to
get
the
facility
that
we
want
and
that
we
can
afford.
But
it
is
a
team
effort.
It
isn't
something
that
a
handful
of
council
members
can
tackle
on
their
own.
That's
what
we
have
staff
for.
D
Mayor,
I
would
like
to
say
they're
here
right
now,
so
you
can
ask
them
if
they
were
part
of
the
process
if
they
have
anything
to
contribute,
but
I
will
want.
I
do
want
to
address
one
thing,
because
you
have
said
it
multiple
times
in
public,
including
tonight.
Yes,
that
was
a
private
conversation.
I
did
say
that
I
was
stepping
back
publicly.
D
You
are
neglecting
to
you
are
neglecting
to
say
the
second
part
of
what
I
said.
I
am
stepping
away
publicly
because
I
did
not
want
this
to
be
used
as
a
political
campaign
agenda
item
that
would
derail
the
city
of
watertown.
This
is
bigger
than
any
one
of
us
up
at
this
council.
The
only
person
guaranteed
to
come
back
here
is
glenn
vilhauer.
D
All
of
us
may
be
gone,
or
some
of
us
might
not
be
here.
This
is
bigger
than
any
one
of
us
and
that's
what
I
said
to
you
is.
I
did
not
want
this
to
be
used
as
a
political
attack
against
either
me
or
anyone
else,
because
this
is
for
the
good
of
watertown
very
seldom.
Do
you
have
the
chance
to
do
something
that
will
be
good
for
the
quality
of
life
that
will
improve
improve
the
life
for
citizens
all
over
watertown,
particularly
the
thousands
of
kids?
D
A
D
I
D
I
A
A
A
B
The
figure
skating
club,
but
we're
eager
to
work
together
to
make
this
a
great
investment
for
our
community
and
I've
been
of
the
mindset
and
most
of
the
feedback.
I've
gotten
from
the
community
public
in
general
is
build.
It
right
and
I've
been
again
a
big
proponent
of
all.
The
all
we
need
from
a
user
standpoint
is
a
couple
of
sheets
of
ice,
but
done
right.
I
believe
this
can
be
an
asset
for
the
community
that
brings
in
income
and
provides
a
great
quality
of
life
initiative.
B
D
A
Hi,
I'm
marcie
cole,
I'm
president
of
waterton
figure
skate
club.
I
would
just
echo
what
eric
said.
We
are
excited
about
this
project.
We
want
to
work
with
the
watertown
hockey
association.
We
want
to
see
this
rink
happen.
We've
talked
about
it
for
so
many
years
and
we
want
to
see
it
happen,
we're
willing
to
work
together
and
we
hope
you
guys
are
too
and
and
get
this
project
done.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
G
B
G
B
B
B
A
E
D
I
just
want
to.
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
being
part
of
this
process.
I
think
it
was
invaluable
for
the
community
and
for
the
council
to
know
what's
going
to
go
forward.
I
just
want
to
stress.
We
have
committed
to
the
memorandum
of
understanding.
We
want
to
continue
with
that
process.
That
is
going
to
be
the
mechanism
that
will
that
will
eventually,
hopefully
guarantee
success
for
us
keep
the
momentum.
We
have
never
been
closer
to
solving
this
long-standing
problem
for
the
community
and
we
have
never
had
an
opportunity
to
do
it.
D
D
A
B
Just
the
last
comment
on
this
whole
deal,
I
mean
this
is
not
just
for
for
hockey
or
for
figure
skating.
This
is
also
for
our
community.
I
I
don't
want
anyone
in
the
community
to
think
that
it's
not
for
the
open
skate.
I
know
there's
been
talk
about
a
junior
league
team
and
things
of
that
nature.
It
is
for
the
entire
community
so
that
we
as
park
and
rec
and
figure
skating
and
hockey
can
utilize
this
for
years
to
come.
So
thank
you
all.
E
M
A
Say
the
title
for
the
record:
we
are
doing
talking
about
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-23
to
supplement
the
2021
budget
for
various
departments
and
projects
and
line
item
transfers
and
there's
no
action
on
this
item
today
and
julie.
Knutson
is
here
from
the
cvb
to
talk
about
one
of
the
line
items,
but
there
are
several
so
okay
go
ahead.
Julie.
M
Thank
you
mayor,
as
the
mayor
just
said,
julie,
knutson,
the
executive
director
of
the
convention
and
visitors
bureau.
Just
we
don't
have.
I
had
just
a
very
short
presentation,
but
I'll
just
go
through
it
real
quickly
at
the
beginning
of
this
year,
due
to
covid
and
just
not
knowing
what
the
bbb
was
going
to
do
and
what
kind
of
performance
we
were
going
to
see,
there
was
a
reduction
to
what
we
had
requested
for
our
budget.
M
We
are
putting
together
a
sports
alliance,
we're
also
putting
together
a
new
position
for
marketing
and
sales.
Also,
we'll
be
we're
bidding
meetings
and
events
and
group
business
five
years
in
advance.
We
lost
over
a
million
dollars
in
in
meeting
business
and
that's
just
what
we
could
count.
It
was
much
much
more
than
that,
so
we're
trying
to
make
up
for
lost
time
a
bit
and
with
a
lot
of
those
groups,
once
you
miss
a
year,
they
just
go
on
to
their
next
destination,
maybe
they're
regional
and
they
go
from
state
to
state.
M
So
we
wouldn't
get
a
lot
of
those
groups
back
for
three
four,
five
or
more
years
when
it's
our
turn
and
then
we
would
be
bidding
against
other,
say
south
dakota
cities,
so
also
business
retention
and
honoring.
Our
current
commitments
we've
had
a
lot
of
interest
in
watertown.
Our
website
views
are
up
over
200
percent,
so
people
are
excited
to
come
to
south
dakota.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
that
we
are,
we
we're
out
there
and
we're
asking
people
to
come
here
and
groups
to
come
here
and
spend
their
money.
M
M
Nobody
rolls
out
the
red
carpet
like
watertown,
and
we
do
some
great
things
for
the
groups
that
come
in
and
we
hear
about
it
for
for
months
and
years
afterwards,
and
so
we
really
don't
want
to
drop
the
level
of
our
customer
service
and
hospitality,
updating
and
maintaining
our
website
and
digital
assets.
Our
virtual
brick
and
mortar
is
outdated.
That's
going
to
be
a
big
line
item
for
us
next
year.
M
They
have
a
new
commissioner,
and
his
intention
is
to
have
is
to
have
five-year
contracts
for
these,
which
is
a
pretty
good,
solid
piece
of
business
for
watertown
that
we
never
had
before,
and
I
just
want
to
since
we're
just
got
done
talking
about
the
hockey,
not
the
hockey
arena
the
ice
arena
when
roger
turnes
was
here.
I
had
park
and
rec
meet
me
out
at
the
premier
ball
fields
and
watertown's
facilities.
M
M
So
the
sports
facilities
don't
produce
revenue
like
this
overnight,
but
we
can't
give
up
on
it
because
there's
potential
out
there
and
there's
a
potential
to
bring
in
some
of
these
big
groups,
we
are
going
to
be
with
the
hotel.
That's
going
up
with
the
ice
arena,
we're
going
to
be
close
to
a
thousand
rooms.
That's
a
complete
game.
Changer
for
watertown
in
being
able
to
accommodate
some
of
these
bigger
groups,
so
don't
lose
sight
of
the
big
picture.
M
That's
a
really
important
thing!
Venue
space
is
huge.
Waterton
watertown.
Does
sports
really
well
we're
a
sports
community?
That's
one
of
the
things
we
excel
at
in
the
visitor
industry,
so
now
back
to
budgets
and
why
we're
different?
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
a
couple
of
things.
Most
group
business
is
procured
two
to
five
years
in
advance,
marketing
and
show
planning
tracks
six
to
15
months
in
advance.
M
M
M
We
don't
know
who's
going
to
want
to
come
here
and
we
don't
want
to
lose
that
business
so
just
to
be
patient
with
us
when
we
come,
and
maybe
we
need
a
little
bit
more
money
or
to
understand
that
planning
is
really
part
of
what
we
need
to
do,
and
it's
really
hard
to
wait
until
november
to
know
even
what
we
have
to
spend
and
if
there's
not
a
way
around
that
that's
fine,
we'll
just
have
to
figure
it
out.
But
as
long
as
we
all
work
together.
M
The
commitment
for
that
we're
looking
for
when
we're
bidding
on
things
is
the
first
thing
that
that
we
need
to
know
is
a
number
of
hotel
rooms
which
is
growing
the
venue
logistics,
which
you
know,
we've
got
great
venues.
We
just
need
to
know
their
availability
and
desired
dates
and
then
availability
of
funding,
assistance,
amenities
and
services
provided,
and
that's
at
the
point
when
everything
when
all
those
things
fit.
M
The
roi
was
nearly
ten
dollars
so
for
every
dollar
you
gave
me,
I
gave
you
almost
ten
dollars
back
nine
dollars
and
seventy
one
cents,
six
dollars
and
forty
seven
cents
of
that.
Ten
dollars
went
to
the
city's
general
capital
funds
for
things
like
potholes
salaries,
flowers
and
to
improve
our
facilities.
So
it's
a
great
partnership.
I
appreciate
your
support,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
rundown.
M
So
if
the
money
that
we
were
the
money
that
came
back
out
of
the
budget
that
we
requested,
if
there's
a
way
that
we
can
have
that
back
or
have
or
be
able
to
use
that,
that
would
be
great
and
then
going
forward.
We've
submitted
our
budget
to
the
finance
office
for
next
year
and
we
appreciate
your
support.
A
G
Thank
you
mayor
just
in
support
of
what
julie
said.
I
am
the
cvb
liaison,
and
that
is
indeed
how
it
kind
of
rolled
out
julie.
Thanks,
you've
done
a
lot
of
good
work.
You've
done
a
lot
of
good
things
and
brought
to
this
community
a
north
star
being
one
of
them,
so
that's
appreciated.
I
also
want
to
reiterate
that
you
heard
the
roi
n
dollars,
but
also
the
highlight
the
fact
that
what
they
work
on
today
shows
up
a
year
or
two
years
down
the
road.
A
I
B
For
instance,
they're
in
the
high
school
arena
and
they're
going,
we've
never
been
in
a
place:
that'll
seat,
5,
000
people,
our
arenas,
see
200
or
300.,
so
they
really
are
thrilled
to
come
to
watertown
and
they
do
bring
a
lot
of
people
in
these
five
tournaments.
That
she's
talking
about
golf,
I'm
not
so
sure,
but.
K
G
M
Right,
they're
not
going
to
have
the
following
in
the
the
crowds
but
the
last
nsaa
basketball
tournament
that
we
had.
I
think
you
were
there
mayor
and
dan.
You
were
there,
the
crowds
were
great
and
actually
the
bbb
was
up
10
in
february,
and
that
was
2020.
yeah
and
that
really
saved
us
actually,
and
we
missed
those
two
tournaments
that
they
they
took
back
to
the
college
campuses
but
they're
anxious
to
come
back
here
and
actually
the
student
experience
is
really
what
sells
that.
That's
what
the
coaches
want.
M
That's
what
the
ads
want
and
that's
what
the
commissioner
wants.
They
want
those
kids
to
have
an
extraordinary
experience,
and
you
know
we
add
things
every
year
to
try
to
make
it
a
little
more
fun
and
some
of
the
comments
we've
gotten
from
those
kids
that
it
seems
like
such
a
big
time
tournament
and
things
like
that
and
dan.
I
can't
go
without
saying
too
that
the
impression
that
they
walk
in
and
see
in
that
in
that
arena
is
150
percent
dan
albertson.
So.
A
F
Thank
you,
mayor,
okay,
so
we're
looking
at
this
ordinance.
What
we
have
going
on
is
this
is
the
first
reading
of
a
budget
supplement
everything
on
here,
except
for
what
julie
just
presented
on
the
council
has
discussed
prior
and
has
kind
of
given
the
go-ahead.
So
I'm
just
going
to
kind
of
run
over
what
they
mean.
If
there's
any
questions,
I
can
try
to
help
cover
that.
But
when
we
look
at
the
first
item,
it's
95
000
that's
going
to
go
to
icap.
F
So
that's
to
give
me
authority
to
up
the
budget
there
and
then,
under
the
recreational
facility,
improvement
the
million
seventy
three
five.
It's
a
combination
of
a
couple
things:
a
million
five
thousand
for
the
city
park,
additional
funding,
not
city
park,
wow
downtown
park;
okay,
that's
to
supplement
that
and
then
68
500
of
that
is
to
help
supplement
the
ada
park.
That's
going
to
go
in
when
we
look
at
the
second
page
of
this.
This
is
actually
for
the
line
transfers.
F
In
the
general
fund,
rob
with
the
street
department
has
actually
asked
that
we
could
take
some
of
his
budget
that
was
used
for
the
dub
trucks.
They
came
in
a
little
bit
less
and
he
did
purchase
one
pickup
and
he
thinks
if
he
transfers
this
he'll
be
able
to
get
another
pickup
for
the
street
department.
I
know
heath
is
in
there.
I
don't
know
if
rob
is
in
the
chamber
or
not.
F
If
the
council
has
any
more
questions,
they
could
ask
rob
or
heath
that
and
then
the
last
part,
the
ten
thousand
dollars
that's
to
actually
help
cover
again
that
ada
park
so
terry
between
all
the
donations
and
then
the
supplement
and
kind
of
getting
everything
handled
to
cover
that
ada
park.
We're
gonna
do
a
ten
thousand
dollar
transfer
of
some
other
capital
improvement
funds.
So
if
there's
any
questions,
I
can
try
to
answer
them.
Otherwise
this
is
the
first
reading
and
it'll
come
back
to
the
council
at
the
next
meeting.
A
B
N
N
Both
our
patch
crews,
actually
this
year
we're
trying
to
have
two
crews.
Again,
we
didn't
have
we
had
one
crew
last
year,
but
our
patch
crews
use
pickups
a
lot.
We
always
have
our
hot
box
hooked
up
to
one
all
the
time
and
then,
if
there's
any
flooding
or
raining
going
on,
we
send
out
two
man,
crews
throughout
town,
to
make
sure
we
don't
have
any
drains
blocked
up
and
flooding
people
so
yeah.
N
I
N
Right
sort
of
thing:
we
do
a
lot
of
that
in-house
on
on
rainy
days,
if
we
can,
if
it's
something
that's
close
to
or
is
overdue,
we'll
take
them
in
generally,
all
of
our
big
trucks
and
our
loaders
and
stuff
like
that.
We
try
to
do
it
in-house,
because
that
gets
quite
expensive
to
have
a
mechanic
come
down
and
do
that
type
of
stuff,
but
sometimes
local
places
will
do
oil
changes
on
our
pickups
and
stuff
like
that
through
them,
that's
reasonable.
L
Looking
at
the
bids
that
we
purchased
our
other
equipment
off
of
this
year,
finding
some
cost
savings
and
actually
trim
back
some
of
what
he
had
anticipated
buying
on
some
of
the
systems
and
equipped
pieces
of
equipment
and
as
a
cost
savings
due
to
a
change
in
the
plans,
and
so
I
felt
as
more
than
appropriate
to
go
ahead
and
use
these
leftover
funds
from
the
21
budget
to
allocate
towards
a
new
pickup
and
as
far
as
the
pickup
usage,
you
know
he
cited
the
newest
one.
They
have
as
an
09.
L
If
you
think
back.
That's
that's
a
good
handful
of
years
ago
now,
already
and
just
kind
of
like
the
street
facility
rob,
is
making
do
with
a
lot
of
older
pieces
of
equipment,
older
facilities
and
he's
doing
a
great
job
at
it.
But
I
just
want
to
express
my
support
for
the
street
division
of
public
works
to
continue
to
build
those
fleet
pieces
of
equipment
up
to
an
updated
level
that
they
deserve
to
have
a
lot
of
times
there.
L
For
instance,
the
operations
are
impacted
negatively
because
he
doesn't
have
a
crew
cab,
pickup
they're,
sharing
a
regular
cab
or
a
double
cab.
So
little
things
like
that
go
a
long
way
in
gaining
efficiencies
for
their
operations
as
well.
So
it's
not
just
about
driving
a
new
truck,
but
also
about
the
operations
and
gaining
efficiencies
too.
So.
A
I
think,
we're
item,
a
application
for
a
new
retail
on
off
sale,
malt
beverage
and
south
dakota
farm
wine
license
to
north
shore
inc,
doing
business
as
north
shore
inc
at
100
north
lake
drive,
and
I
will
ask
the
I
guess
I
can
take
a
motion
for
approval,
have
a
motion
by
manti
and
a
second
by
redempsky,
and
I
will
ask
the
finance
officer,
kristen
bob
zine,
to
tell
us
about
this.
One.
F
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
for
both
of
these
a
and
b
it's
the
same.
It's
north
shore
doing
business
as
north
shore
incorporated
one
would
be
for
your
malt
beverage
farm
wine
license
and
then
the
others
for
the
wine
insider
license
both
of
these
are
for
the
on
off
sale.
Currently,
what
they
hold
is
an
actual
retail
on
sale,
liquor
license
and
with
that
license,
there's
no
ability
to
sell
any
alcoholic
beverages
off
sale,
which
means
like
a
six-pack
or
12-pack,
so
that
would
give
them
that
ability
with
both
of
these
licenses.
A
A
Seeing
no
one
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
entertain
council
discussion,
any
comments,
counsel
or
questions
all
right
hearing,
none
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Anyone
a
post
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
he
item
b.
Is
application
for
a
new
retail
on
off
sale
wine
and
cider
license
to
north
shore
inc,
doing
business
as
north
shore
inc
at
100
north
lake
drive.
A
I
have
a
motion
by
lollam
and
a
second
by
albertson
and
kirsten
already
talked
about
this
one,
so
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
Is
there
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
about
this?
Please
approach
the
microphone
or
say
permission
to
speak
hearing
no
one.
I
close
the
public
hearing,
counsel
any
questions
or
comments
scene,
nine
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
A
A
F
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Questions,
counsel,
no
questions
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
oh
wait.
Do
we
need
a
public
hearing
on
this?
No,
not
for
the
renewal.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
okay,
this
next
one.
We
need
a
public
hearing
item
e
is
application
for
a
special
retail
malt
beverage
and
wine
license
to
the
watertown
area
chamber
of
commerce
from
six
o'clock
p.m.
On
thursday
june
july,
15
2021
until
11
o'clock
p.m.
On
saturday
july,
17
2021
for
cooking
on
compesca.
F
A
Okay-
and
we
did
advertise
a
public
hearing
for
this
one,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
open
that
public
hearing
at
this
time
is
there
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
about
cooking
on
compesca
online,
just
say
permission
to
speak
hearing
no
one.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
counsel
any
questions
or
comments.
Councilman
bill,
harr.
J
They,
yes,
the
description
on
the
application
would
limit
them
to
the
boundaries
in
which
they
can
sell
and
also
where
that
alcohol
that's
sold
can
be
consumed.
Now
now,
if
you
know,
there's
people
that
obviously
bring
their
own
alcohol
to
the
park-
and
you
know,
hang
out
their
campsite
and
stuff
like
that,
so,
but
legally,
the
alcohol
that's
sold
pursuant
to
the
special
event
license,
needs
to
be
consumed
in
the
same
footprint.
Okay,.
H
J
A
Much
police
chief
shaking
his
head,
no
problem,
so
that's
reassuring
any
other
questions
or
comments
all
right.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
and
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item
f
is
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-16,
an
amendment
to
chapter
24.06,
subdivision
procedure
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown.
A
L
Thank
you
mayor,
of
course.
As
a
second
reading,
I
gave
a
brief
introduction,
the
last
meeting
at
first
reading
about
the
necessity
to
add
some
language
back
in,
at
least
from
staff's
perspective
regarding
the
subdivision
regulations.
There's
two
specific
sections
in
there
that
we'd
be
mending
with
this
ordinance.
L
That
is
the
preliminary
plan
requirements
and
the
construction
plan
requirements
both
found
in
chapter
24
of
the
city
ordinances,
which
are
the
subdivision
regulations.
This
is
specific
to
the
groundwater
elevation
being
identified
on
both
those
plans
and
then
ensuring
that
the
lowest
recommended
floor
elevations
for
the
structures
or
at
least
two
feet
above
those
observed-
groundwater
elevations.
L
This
was
something
that
has
been
in
our
ordinances
in
the
past
and
if
you
recall
a
few
months
back,
we
updated
chapter
24
to
excuse
me
to
create
some
more
streamlined
development
review
processes,
and
we
inadvertently
didn't
plug.
Keep
this
language
plugged
in
it
was
going
to
get
moved
to
a
different
section
and
staff,
it
just
kind
of
slipped
through
the
cracks,
and
we
didn't
get
it
put
back
in
that
section.
So
we're
just
cleaning
that
up
and
adding
it
there
now
and
with
any
questions,
I'd
be
glad
to
help
answer
them.
I
L
L
I
L
A
J
Thank
you
mayor.
This
was
a
ordinance
amendment
project
that
was
kind
of
spearheaded
by
councilman
hoyer.
Essentially,
what
this
ordinance
change
would
do.
It
would
strike
from
the
definition
of
bar
tavern
off
sale,
alcoholic
beverage
sales
and
so
an
establishment
that
was
only
intending
to
sell
off
sale.
Alcohol
would
no
longer
need
to
receive
the
conditional
use
permit
for
bar
tavern,
and
this
was
approved
by
the
plan
commission
on
may
6th.
H
I
know
when
not
this
particular
change
came
before
us,
but
something
that
had
the
same
net
effect
several
years
ago
and
I
believe
target
was
a
specific
location
that
was
being
looked
at
at
that
time.
I
know
we
had
our
police
department
weigh
in
with
their
thoughts
on
it.
I
have
talked
to
the
chief
tim
toomey
prior
to
the
meeting.
He
has
shared
some
comments
to
me
by
email.
I
guess
I
would
like
to
have
chief
toomey
just
make
a
few
comments
from
from
his
perspective.
As
to
this
change.
E
Thanks
good
evening,
council,
madam
mayor,
we
really
don't
see
an
issue
with
it.
It
is
going
to
increase
our
enforcement
action
as
far
as
law
enforcement
is
concerned
for
compliance
checks.
You
know
our
concern
is
keeping
alcohol
out
of
the
hands
of
the
underage,
so
we
would
increase
our
compliance
checks,
but
by
as
far
as
the
police
department's
point
of
view,
we
really
don't
have
an
opinion
so.
A
G
A
A
See
no
one,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
now
I
will
ask
for
action
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
and
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
okay,
I'm
going
to
move
these
around
item.
I
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-21,
an
amendment
to
chapter
2.01,
alcoholic
beverages
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown.
J
What
this
will
also
do
is
revise
the
subsection
one
here
of
this
ordinance
to
state
that
the
essentially
alcoholic
beverage
licenses
can't
be
operated
in
residential
districts.
What
that
accomplishes
for
us
is
that
previously,
that
was,
the
agricultural
zone
was
listed
and
that
was
going
to
pose
an
issue
for
us
with
the
operation
of
a
bar,
tavern
restaurant
at
the
airport
and
then
finally,
here
it
does
remove
the
reference
to
mayor
and
city
council
and
and
leaves
it
to
say
just
city
council,
with
the
impending
change
in
form
of
government.
A
A
L
H
L
M
F
A
J
A
J
A
A
A
O
J
O
O
Jay
sure,
okay,
my
husband
and
I
are
here
to
express
our
opposition
to
the
approach
to
the
recommended
approval
of
ordinance,
2119
amending
section,
3.0
105,
for
multiple
reasons.
We
feel
the
five
dogs
per
house
limit
within
the
city
of
watertown
is
way
too
high
and
we
are
opposed
to
the
elimination
of
the
50
foot
setback.
O
O
Their
side
yard
is
five
feet
from
our
patio,
and
so
when
we
saw
that
we
were
concerned
that
the
new
neighbors
were
going
to
be
building
a
kennel
right
along
behind
that
alcove,
because
there's
a
door
from
the
garage
that
leads
out
there.
So
we
called
animal
control
and
they
did
contact
them
and
shared
with
them.
The
information
and
at
that
time
they
weren't
going
to
they
decided
not
to
build
a
kennel
the
wall,
the
kennel
pieces
are
still
all
there.
O
It
didn't
take
long
after
may,
when
they
moved
in
that
we
had
the
issues
with
bulk
barking
running
through
our
backyard
defecating
peeing
on
our
patio,
and
I
did
go
to
a
animal
control
board
meeting
at
the
police
department
in
august
of
that
year.
Regarding
those
issues-
and
I
relayed
those
to
greg
huff
teaser
and
he
was
just
shocked-
he
said
he
didn't
know.
O
So
before
we
left
for
florida
that
same
year,
the
winter
of
2019
four,
they
did
ultimately
put
up
a
partial
fence
on
our
border.
Just
on
that
one
side
dividing
our
side
yard
from
theirs
and
before
we
left
for
the
winter,
we
saw
that
they
were
attaching
four
kennel
sections
from
that
fence.
Five
feet
from
our
patio
to
their
house
and
closing
that
alcove,
where
the
dogs
could
go
in
and
out,
but
being
very
close,
we
again
called
animal
control
and
were
informed
that
this
was
a
temporary
fence
that
would
be
taken
down
on
monday.
O
They
were
going
to
the
cities.
Okay,
so
we
went
to
florida.
We
came
back,
it's
back
up,
it
had
been
up
all
winter,
so
this
temporary
kennel
knot,
kennel,
has
become
a
temporary
fence,
has
become
a
permanent
fence,
called
animal
control.
They
said
sorry,
it's
legal!
Your
only
options
are,
they
can
keep.
It
up
are
to
call
the
police
when
the
dogs
bark
okay,
so
we
don't
want
to
call
the
police
every
time
the
dogs
bark,
because
that's
every
day,
okay,
so
we
did
deal
with
animal
control,
probably
five.
Six
times
we
dealt.
O
Finally,
ultimately
the
worst
case.
More
recently
was
they
went
out
of
town
multiple
days
had
no
one
checking
on
the
dog
they
used
to.
Have
somebody
come
and
check?
Let
them
out
bring
them
back
into
the
garage.
What
seems
to
be
their
dog
house
now
or
kennel,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it,
and
so
intermittently
night
and
day,
you're
barking,
a
husband
sleeps
in
a
recliner
due
to
a
health
issue
and
a
hip
issue
intermittent,
doesn't
help
when
it
wakes
you
up.
O
O
So
now,
when
they're
gone,
which
was
just
recently
again
for
multiple
days
this
past
week,
and
but
they
have
this
man
that
comes
over
two
three
times
a
day,
lets
them
out
of
the
garage
to
do
their
job
and
puts
them
back
well
to
top
it
off,
my
husband
was
sitting
on
the
patio
or
the
deck
very
small
deck
right
outside
of
our
dining
room
and
the
dog
started
barking
and
he
had
the
guts
to
say.
You're
harassing
my
dogs
get
back
in
your
house
now.
O
That's
fine
and
they've
still
got
that
out
there
and
I
don't
care
how
often
they
run
that
sprinkler
system,
which
is
two
to
three
times
a
day,
just
indicating
how
they
have
too
many
there
to
dilute,
and
in
the
summer
when
it's
hot
it
still
stinks,
and
it's
right
next
to
our
patio
and
anytime,
anybody
comes
over.
That's
that's
the
mess
we
have
to
deal
with,
and
I
don't
know
what
the
solution
is.
O
I
just
know
that
two
years
it's
been
a
nightmare
and
it
only
pertains
to
us
only
affects
us
because
of
the
proximity
of
our
deck,
our
patio,
our
fire
pit,
our
garden
are
all
right,
five
feet
in
from
that
border,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
that
it
looks
like
if
this
passes
we're
going
to
never
solve
this
problem.
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
and
thank
you.
I
hope
they
reconsider
this
because
it
affects
us.
O
O
G
G
Matt
I'll
put
you
on
the
spot.
Here
is.
I
know
there
are
some
issues
that
pop
up,
maybe
not
dogs
but
other
things
where
it
does
violate
covenants.
That's
not
an
ordinance.
It
goes
with
the
property
and
it's
unfortunately
incumbent
upon
the
property
owner
to
take
an
action
with
that
matt.
You
have
any
experience
with
that.
J
G
J
J
O
O
They're
barking,
they've
already
been
a
nuisance
and,
like
I
say,
we've
called
the
police
twice
and
one
of
the
reasons
we
haven't
called
them
earlier
is
because
we're
gone
half
of
the
year
if
they
get
cited
and
they
can
test
it
we're
going
to
be
out
of
state
by
the
time
it
gets
to
court.
So
it's
just
kind
of
like
we
don't
go
out
much,
but
it's
pretty
aggravating
when
somebody
tells
you
that
we're
harassing
them
we're
harassing
their
dogs
when
they've
been
disturbing
us
for
two
years.
O
So
I
I
don't
know
we
don't
seem
to
have
a
solution,
but
when
I
saw
these
changes
I
thought
I
thought
they
might
help.
I
don't
think
so.
Five
dogs
out
there
barking
at
one
time
is
very
loud,
and
I
don't
know
this
probably
doesn't
pertain
to
this
at
all.
I
probably
have
to
go
to
somebody
else
I
might
might
not.
O
I
don't
know
that
any
of
them
are
licensed
which
would
require
them
to
be
vaccinated
because
you're
supposed
to
I
read
the
law
pertaining
to
how
much
time
and
the
licensing
and
how
often
and
having
to
be
vaccinated.
First,
I
don't
know
that
any
of
them
are,
but
we
don't
talk
to
them
because
I
don't
want
to
get
in
a
hassle.
G
C
C
So
if
you
have
a
dog,
kennel
and
a
dog
house,
that's
what
we're
calling
an
enclosure
instead
of
a
kennel
and
that's
the
ones
that
are
required
to
meet
the
setbacks
that
we
have
for
any
other
accessory
structure,
a
shed
or
whatever.
So
what
we
did
was
we
took
out
that
confusion
about
the
word
kennel
and
changed
the
residential
structure
to
be
enclosure,
so
it
would
be
the
dog
house
and
then
the
dog
enclosure.
So
that's
what
we
did
with
the
last
change
we
just
made
to
the
zoning
ordinance.
C
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
more
questions
I
can
clarify
on
that.
Did
I
get
that
all
got
that
okay
got
guys
not
in
their
heads
over
there,
so
we've
got
that
now
as
we
get
to
the
next
one
in
terms
of
the
five
dogs,
the
reason
we
came
to
five:
it
was
a
negotiation
and
kind
of
a
back
and
forth
between
planning
and
zoning
and
the
animal
control
board.
Typically,
in
the
past,
there
had
been
a
push
back
against
a
limit
on
the
number
of
dogs.
C
We
shouldn't
have
any
limits
and
we
should
have
some
limits,
and
so
that's
where
they
came
up
with
that
now
I
had
something
going
to
go
with
that
five
anyway,
there's
where
we're
at
you
know
just
to
do
that,
and
so
we
looked
at
other
cities
and
what
their
rules
were.
We,
like
I
said
we
talked
to
animal
control,
police
department,
veterinarians.
C
What
was
their
experience
with
that,
and
so
this
was
a
very
rare
occurrence,
so
so
it
was
one
of
those
things
where
we
went
back
and
forth
with
planning
and
zoning.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
on
it
and
this
was
where
everything
fell
out
that
everybody
was
comfortable
with.
So
that's
that's
how
that
worked,
and
I
I
don't
know
what
the
answer
is,
and
I
don't
know
if
matt
can
help
or
whatever
what
is
happening
up
with
you.
C
Guys
is
a
matter
of
a
combination
of
of
covenants
and
not
being
you
know
in
just
a
bad
neighbor
situation,
and
I
I
wish
I
had
answers
for
you
as
to
how
to
resolve
that
bad
neighbor
situation.
That's
a
rare
thing
that
have
we
don't
get
calls
on
a
regular
basis
for
other
situations
like
yours,
and
I
I'm
not
a
lawyer.
So
I
don't
I'm
back
out
of
my
depth
now
when
I
say
that
I
don't
I
don't
know
what
else
we
can.
C
I
believe
that
these
new
setback
rules
will
actually
help
people,
because
you'll
no
longer
be
able
to
stick
your
kennel
right
up
on
the
lot
line
and
be
able
to
say
yep,
I'm
slapping
my
kennel
up
on
the
lot
line,
and
then
you
do
have
somebody
who
has
their
dogs
running
right.
Next
to
I
don't
know
what
your
layout
of
your
of
your
property
is,
but
so
this,
by
by
doing
the
setbacks,
will
actually
keep
people
from
putting
their
dog
enclosures
right
on
the
lot
line.
C
J
I'll
chime
in
a
little
bit
too
so
it
sounds
like
maybe
one
of
the
primary
issues
is
the
odor
that
just
even
though
it's
not
on
your
property,
it's
coming
from
is
that
was
that
I
understood
you
correctly.
So
there
I
mean
there's
a
statute
or
excuse
me
an
ordinance
that
the
police
department,
couldn't
you
know,
investigate
and
potentially
cite
them
for,
allowing
for
allowing
that
to
occur
and
and
for
to
offend
you
as
a
neighbor.
J
J
Now
there's
been
debate
about
whether
or
not
that
was
the
intent
of
the
original
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance,
because
there's
the
definition
of
kennel
is
identical
to
the
title
iii
definition,
with
the
exception
of
the
word
own.
So
the
word
own
is
in
the
definition
in
title
21,
meaning
again
it
could
be
interpreted
to
mean.
If
you
want
to
have
more
than
two
dogs,
you
need
to
get
a
conditional
use
in
the
egg
zone
and
the
animal
control
board.
A
C
B
I
sympathize
with
what
you're
talking
about
with
your
neighbor
situation.
I
also
noticed
that
chief
toomey
did
stop
over
and
visit
with
you
and
my
feeling
with
chief
toomey
is
that
he
will
do
everything
he
can
to
help
you.
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
think
of
how
this
policy
is
going
to
help
your
situation
and,
quite
frankly,
I
don't
think
a
yes
or
a
no
vote
is
going
to
help
that,
but
chief
toomey
might
be
able
to
help
you,
and
I
know
you
don't
wanna.
B
I
know
you
don't
want
the
hatfields
and
mccoys,
but
the
truth
is.
I
think
that
chief
toomey
is
your
answer
to
it
and
not
this
particular
policy
or
either
one
of
these
two
and
you
don't
want
to
go
there,
but
I
think
I
mean,
if
you're
getting
accused
of
disturbing
somebody's
dogs
by
sitting
on
your
patio,
I
would
say:
keep
calling
chief
to
me
until
he
gets
tired
of
you
calling
him,
because
when
he
does
he's
going
to
say
you
know,
I've
tried
to
work
this
out
and
now
we're
going
to
get
serious
about
it.
A
O
G
Regrettably,
in
that
sense,
if
it's
a
covenant
violation,
your
only
real
option-
I
think,
is
small
claims
court
or
to
take
a
legal
action
and
that's
regrettable,
but
when
the
homeowners
association
is
not
staffed
with
the
president
and
officers,
what
have
you
and
they're
paying
dues
it's?
It
really
falls
on
you,
regrettably,
that
that's
kind
of
the
only
option
you've
got
from
covenant.
Standpoint.
O
O
I
don't
know
it's
right
on
our
border
and
our
border
is
real
close,
and
so
it
affects
us
every
day
and
I
do
know
that
they're
getting
them
back
in
after
they
bark,
but
they
have
the
doggy
door.
So
you
got
this
big
garage,
that's
their
dog
house
and
they
go
out
the
doggy
door
into
that
small
enclosure
and,
of
course,
every
time
they're
out
there.
O
So
but
since
we
have
called
the
police,
the
last
couple
of
times
they've
been
more
careful
that
once
they're
barking
within
a
couple
of
minutes,
they
get
them
back
in,
but
that
intermittent
barking
and
that
still
being
there
and
that
their
irrigation
system
goes
off
twice,
sometimes
three
times
a
day,
every
day,
rain
or
shine.
I
know
why
they
did
it
when
the
dogs
were
going
out
in
the
yard
before
the
fence
was
to
dilute
it.
M
O
A
B
A
A
J
J
Yep,
so
in
conjunction
with
the
ordinance
that
was
just
approved,
this
ordinance
affects
title
iii,
the
animal
control
ordinance
and
it,
I
guess
three
main
three
main
results
here.
It
removes
the
definition
of
kennel
from
the
from
animal
control
and
because
it
was
now
it's
now
placed
under
title
21
as
a
commercial
kennel.
C
J
Well,
so
that's
the
kind
of
the
rub
on
this
stuff
is
especially
with
the
kennels
I
suspect.
There's
we've
just
created
a
bunch
of
non-conforming
kennels
we've
also
if
this
is
approved
a
point
in
case
here
with
individuals
that
have
eight
dogs.
I
suspect
we'll
enforce
these
until
we're
until
they
assert
a
grandfathering.
J
We
will
enforce
them
as
as,
if
we
can.
So,
if
we
say
hey,
you
have
a
kennel
that
violates
the
rule.
If
they
push
back
and
say
well,
it
was
here
before
and
they
try
to,
and
they
show
us
that
that's
true,
then
that's
they're,
probably
they're,
probably
exempt
from
that
regulation
same
with
the
number
of
dogs.
If
we
say
hey,
you
have
eight
dogs.
J
C
D
A
A
J
Thank
you
mayor
in
2019,
the
council
approved
a
revision
to
the
dangerous
and
vicious
dog
process
in
ordinance
and
through
the
last
two
years
of
operation.
There's
been
a
few
just
a
few
identified
clarifications
that
were
needed
as
a
result
of
kind
of
road
testing
the
ordinance,
and
so
it
just
makes
some
minor
clarifications.
One.
J
J
H
C
I
believe
it
has
and
as
we
go
forward,
it
also
offers
clarification
to
law
enforcement
and
to
the
animal
control
officer
as
to
what
and
that's
where
some
of
these
changes
have
come
about.
You
know
we,
like
matt,
said
we've
road
tested
it
we've
used
it
we've
taken
input
from
officers,
animal
control
and
we
try
to
make
it
so
that
it's
user
friendly
too
for
law
enforcement
as
well
as
the
public.
C
You
know
somebody
we've
had
problems
in
the
past,
where
we
couldn't
make
much
happen
about
a
vicious
dog
without
going
to
court,
and
that
leaves
a
very
vicious
and
dangerous
situation,
vicious
and
dangerous
danger,
but
it
leaves
a
dangerous
situation
to
the
public
when
we
haven't
been
able
to
take
that
action.
So
this
this
helps
do
that
too.
J
J
There
wasn't
a
whole
lot
to
it.
Really,
the
definition,
the
word
the
word
choice
was
vicious,
so
it
was
a
vicious
dog,
and
so
now
we
have
these
two
kind
of
levels
where
vicious.
If
a
dog
is
declared
vicious,
we're
saying
that
dog
needs
to
be
euthanized,
unless
you
show
us
otherwise,
whereas
dangerous,
it's
it's
it's
less
serious.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Any
other
questions
or
comments
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
okay,
we
removed
item
l
and
we're
moving
to
item
m
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-22,
a
temporary
emergency
ordinance
of
the
city
of
watertown
regarding
the
issuance
of
load,
local
medical,
cannabis,
establishment
permits
and
or
licenses,
and
I
will
ask
the
public
works
director
heath
von
eye
to
kick
this
one
off
for
us.
No
action
tonight.
L
L
The
purpose
of
this
emergency
ordinance
amendment
is
to
allow
time
for
the
city
to
create
and
adopt
the
pertinent
zoning
requirements
for
medical
cannabis
use,
while
also
coinciding
with
the
state
of
south
dakota's
department
of
health
regulations.
Now,
south
dakota
codified
law
allows
for
the
legal
use
of
medical
marijuana
effective
on
july
1st
2021.
L
That
of
course,
falls
under
the
community
development
function
of
public
works
and
with
that
stacy
bungard
community
development
manager
is
online
with
us
tonight
and
she's
helped
draft
this
in
collaboration
with
first
district
and
the
south
dakota
municipal
league
and,
of
course,
matt's
helped
off
and
on
with
those
same
groups
as
well.
So
we'll
all
stand
by
for
any
questions.
J
J
But
the
concern
that
kind
of
prompted
this
this
desire
to
have
a
temporary
ordinance
is
that
if
somebody
applies
for
a
dispensary
license,
for
example-
and
we
don't
have
anything
in
place
well,
if
the
state
comes
out
with
the
rules
they
meet
that
rule,
the
state
calls
us
and
says:
have
they
have?
They
met
your
rules
and
we
say
we
don't
have
any
they
say.
J
Okay,
then
here's
your
license
go
operate
wherever
you
want
to
operate,
so
the
intent
here
is
to
hit
a
little
bit
of
a
pause
button
and
just
to
let's
back
up
a
little
bit.
You
know
you
know
somebody
might
be
looking
at
this
going
well.
Why
are
we
doing
this
temporary
emergency
ordinance?
This
was
passed
in
november
shouldn't.
J
We
have
had
something
ready
to
go
well
part
of
what
happened
here
was
we
were
getting
these
cues
from
the
legislature
all
along
right
up
until
about
almost
the
last
two
days,
the
legislature
that
there
was
going
to
be
some
sort
of
a
fix
that
was
going
to,
I
shouldn't,
say
a
fix,
but
some
sort
of
action
that
was
going
to
put
this
off
into
the
future
a
little
bit
and
then,
even
after
the
session
was
over.
There
was
still
talk
of
a
special
session.
That
said
well.
Do
we
need
to
do
anything
yet?
J
Is
the
legislature
going
to
act?
We
don't
know
so
then
we
got
to
about
six
weeks
ago
and
it
was
pretty
clear
that
we
needed
to
put
something
in
place.
So
this
is
the
immediate
action
that
we
would
take
to
stall
or
not
stall,
but
to
give
us
time
to
put
in
more
permanent
requirements
for
licensing
and
zoning
in
time
to
meet
that
october.
29Th
deadline
that
the
state
has.
A
Okay,
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
we've
already
done
in
o
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-24,
a
temporary
emergency
ordinance
of
the
city
of
watertown
and
coddington
county
regarding
the
issuance
of
local
medical,
cannabis,
establishment
permits
and
or
licenses
sounds
very
much
like
the
one
we
just
did
so
I'll.
Ask
the
public
works
director
heath
von
I
to
introduce
this
one,
maybe
tell
us
the
difference.
L
L
L
J
No
but
the
so
what
thursday
they'll
be
that
that
joint,
that
joint
board
will
be
meeting.
I
guess
brandy
could
probably
chime
in
on
that
and
then
the
actually
the
city
council.
What's
odd
about
that
joint
jurisdictional
zone.
Is
it
actually
has
to
be
a
joint
meeting
of
both
the
county
commission
and
the
city
council?
A
A
All
right,
very
good!
Thank
you
all
right,
we'll
move
on
to
item
p,
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-25
an
ordinance
amending
section,
10.0105
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown,
replacing
references
to
mayor
with
city
manager
relating
to
the
duties
and
powers
of
the
fire
chief,
it's
the
first
reading.
So
no
action
and
I'll
ask
the
city
attorney
matt
roby,
to
tell
us
about
this
change.
J
Thank
you
mayor,
so
this
this
kind
of
tags,
along
with
the
mayor
to
manager,
changes.
I
guess
matter
of
course,
changes
almost
that
we
made
with
the
second
reading
at
the
last
meeting
the
reason
this
one
was
kept
out
separately.
I
just
I
had
this
thought
in
my
head
that
maybe
it
would
be
treated
a
little
differently
because
of
it's
giving
the
fire
chief.
Basically
one
of
the
abilities
it
gives.
J
The
fire
chief
is
to
tear
down
buildings
that
aren't
otherwise
on
fire
and
to
maybe
stop
the
spread
of
a
fire,
but
so
I
didn't
know
if
that
should
be
a
political
decision
or
not,
but
based
on
the
feedback
I
got
from
the
council
at
the
last
meeting,
it
seems
pretty
clear
that
it
should
just
follow
the
chain
of
command.
So
the
proposal
here
is
just
to
replace
mayor
and
council
here
with
city
manager
as
the
fire
chief's
superior.
A
J
J
It
does
two
things
one:
it
just
updates
the
council
composition,
language
and
the
ordinance
to
essentially
just
match
what
the
homeworld
charter
already
says
and
two.
It
replaces
the
election
process
for
council
president
and
vice
president
with
the
election
process
for
deputy
mayor
requiring
the
deputy
mayor
to
receive
four
yes
votes
to
be
elected,
deputy
mayor.
H
A
Yeah,
it
takes
a
word
man
like
that
with
a
big
brain.
So
luckily
we
have
that
on
our
staff,
any
any
other
questions
or
comments.
All
right.
We'll
move
on
to
item
r
approval
of
resolution,
number
21-24,
contingency
transfer,
general
and
capital
improvement
funds
have
a
motion
by
albertson
and
a
second
by
bill,
howard
and
I'll.
Ask
the
finance
officer
kirsten
bob
zine
to
tell
us
about
this,
please
if
she's
still
on
yes,
she
is.
B
F
Okay,
so
the
resolution
2124
is
actually
for
the
contingency
transfer,
as
I
was
saying
to
myself
earlier
so
we'll
start
with
the
general
fund,
so
the
general
fund
in
the
police
department
and
if
there's
any
further
questions
tim,
can
step
up
and
help
too.
But
the
police
department
had
an
opportunity
to
essentially
kind
of
package
deal
the
tasers
on
the
body
cams
and
then
the
video
storage.
F
With
this
it
increases
their
annual
maintenance.
But
what
we'll
see
is
in
the
next
couple
years,
it'll
be
a
reduction
of
the
capital
purchases,
so
there
won't
be
the
need
for
the
purchase
of
the
tasers
and
the
body
cam.
So
the
library
dede
was
here.
I
think
it
was
the
last
meeting
and
she
asked
for
an
increase
to
finish
out
the
carpeting
throughout
the
library.
So
this
will
cover
that
budget
and
then
under
the
capital
improvement
fund.
F
This
was
a
long
time
ago
that
we
talked
about
this,
but
the
hvac
unit
on
the
prairie
lakes,
wellness
center
does
need
to
be
replaced
and
that
kind
of
terry
came
forward
and
asked
for
authority
to
do
that
and
to
get
the
process
started.
And
it's
here
I
think
he
said
it's
coming
in
tomorrow,
so
this
will
give
that
budget
authority.
So
if
there's
any
questions,
I
can
try
to
answer
them.
Otherwise,
that's.
A
D
A
Item
s
is
approval
of
a
professional
services
agreement
for
the
level
3
cultural
resource
inventory
and
architectural
recording
for
the
watertown
regional
airport
project
number
1927,
with
metcalfe
archaeological
consultants
inc
in
the
amount
of
thirty
eight
thousand
six
hundred
sixty
eight
dollars
authorize
the
mayor
to
sign
all
applicable
documents
motion
by
heuer
and
a
second
by.
Why,
and
I
will
ask
the
public
works
director
heath
van
I
to
tell
us
about
it.
L
Thank
you
mayor
this.
This
professional
services
agreement
will
help
the
airport
accomplish
a
few
things.
It'll
get
the
full
airport
property
certified
and
cleared
for
additional
development,
and
we've
ran
into
a
couple
issues
recently
where
we
haven't
had
adequate
space
that
have
had
this
study
and
this
level
of
clearance
performed
yet,
and
that's
prevented
us
from
utilizing
the
property
in
the
way
we'd
want
to.
One
of
those
instances
was
the
snow
removal
equipment
building
where
we
had
several
different
locations
identified
as
potential
possibilities.
L
We
ended
up
landing
with
one
that
will
work
very
effectively
and
is
not
an
issue,
but
the
not
having
this
study
done
did
limit
our
options.
Another
discussion
recently,
as
you
recall,
is
egg
operator
ariel
spraying
operation
that
would
like
to
start
their
business
being
performed
from
the
airport
property
and
again
we're
out
of
space
to
offer
that
business
operator,
because
we
don't
have
these
clearances
performed.
L
Yet
at
this
point
this
is
one
step
in
the
right
direction
to
meet
those
faa
requirements
in
providing
these
archaeological
clearances
and
again
this
would
impact
and
provide
these
clearances
for
the
entire
airport
property
and
provide
any
level
of
detailed
information
through
this
study
on
any
mitigation
that
may
have
to
occur
with
all
that
being
said,
airport
manager,
todd
cyrus
online,
along
with
I
believe,
representative
from
helms,
is
with
us
too
tonight.
If
you
have
any
questions
we'll
stand
by
for
them.
H
I
L
D
L
L
H
L
Yes,
it
would
and
I'd
refer
to
todd
and
maybe
expand
on
that
component,
a
little
bit
or
brooke
from
helms
just
to
get
a
feel
for
you
know
there
may
be
mitigation
efforts,
but
there
also
just
may
be
clear
prohibition
of
areas
that
we
cannot
touch
or
get
into
as
well
is
minor
standing
but
could
brook
or
todd.
Could
you
please
expand
on
that.
B
A
A
I
B
F
E
B
F
A
A
Item
t
is
authorize
the
mayor
to
sign
a
joint
powers
agreement
with
the
state
of
south
dakota
and
watertown
fire
rescue.
I
have
a
motion
by
councilman
roby
and
a
second
by
redempsky
other
way
around
okay
motion
by
rademski
second,
by
roby,
and
we
have
our
fire
chief
don
roland
here
to
make
the
presentation.
I
G
B
What
this
does
it's
a
15
section
plan
that
kind
of
identifies
how
we
get
activated,
how
we're
alerted,
how
we
demobilize
and
how
we
get
our
money
back
as
well
so,
and
our
finance
officer
likes
that.
So
with
that,
I
just
asked
for
approval
to
sign
it
with
the
mayor,
the
finance
director,
the
department
of
public
safety.
A
A
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Anyone
who
posts
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
U
is
presentation
on
downtown
parking
discussion
and
parking
committee
recommendations
so
we'll
have
the
we
have
police
chief,
tim,
toomey
and
street
superintendent
rob
bainen
here
to
give
the
presentation.
E
All
right
mayor
city
council,
thanks
for
giving
us
an
opportunity
to
talk
about
this.
This
is
a
pretty
exciting
topic
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
getting
your
input
on
the
presentation.
I
want
to
thank
the
committees,
the
committee
members
of
the
downtown
parking
committee.
It's
mayor
karen
councilman,
mike
hugher,
hoyer,
councilwoman,
beth,
manty,
city
attorney,
matt,
roby,
and
rob
and
myself.
E
We
put
some
work
into
this.
So
in
how
this
began
was
in
early
2020,
the
police
department
was
directed
to
the
old
elk
slot
where
there
was
some
abandoned
vehicles.
There
was
a
bus
there's
a
camper.
There
was
several
abandoned
vehicles
left
in
the
parking
lot
and
it
came
to
our
attention.
We
didn't
have
a
time
frame
on
ordinance
for
that
you
could
park
in
a
city
lot.
So
that's
why
we
formed
the
committee
and
that
has
expanded
into
the
downtown
parking
lot.
E
It's
not
a
new
problem,
I'm
sure
all
you
guys
are
well
aware.
This
came
out
in
in
the
h2o
2020
study
as
well,
but
parking
has
been
an
issue
in
the
downtown
or
challenge
in
the
downtown
area
for
many
many
years.
These
are
all
just
news:
articles
from
the
early
60s
of
council
taking
action
on
the
downtown
parking.
E
So
today
I'm
just
going
to
go
over
a
little
bit
of
the
historical.
If
you
wanted
a
history
review,
but
we
did
have
parking
meters
back
in
the
60s
until
the
late
70s
and
then
we
removed
those
after
jcpenney's
moved
out
moved
over
to
the
watertown
mall.
We
had
the
two
to
five
parking.
We
had
some
chiefs
police
made
it
a
sign
complaint.
Some
had
people
hired
to
go
around
checking
for
violations.
E
E
So
what
are
the
business
owners
saying?
These
are
taken
off
of
social
media
as
well
as
in
person,
but
they
had
a
lot
of
great
comments
and
a
lot
of
great
ideas.
This
one
particular
person
thought
sprucing
up
the
public
lots.
It
would
be
a
big
plus,
better
signage
striping,
maybe
make
the
they're
cleaned
occasionally
and
adding
a
little
landscaping.
E
E
E
So
here's
some
pictures
of
the
downtown
this
should
be
changed
to
downtown
parking
lots.
But
this
is
an
example
of
what
the
signs
look
like.
If
you
can
see
this
little
sign
over
here,
if
you're
driving
around
looking
for
a
parking
spot,
you're
not
going
to
look
up
and
see
that
little
sign
and
that's
what
is
indicative
of
all
our
parking
lots,
we
identified
nine
different
public
parking
lots
in
the
downtown
area,
which
was
more
than
I
expected.
E
I
know
there's
some
development
going
on
we're
going
to
maybe
lose
a
couple,
but
we're
having
other
plans
for
that.
This
is
the
10
block
of
third
street
by
the
city
senior
citizen
center.
That's
one
of
the
parking
lots
that
are
probably
going
to
be
consumed
by
that
park
and
have
some
different
opportunities
there.
E
This
is
a
little
parking
lot.
If
you
added
up
all
these
spots,
there's
hundreds
of
parking
spots
in
these
public
parking
lots
that
aren't
being
used
to
their
full
potential,
and
you
can
see
these
little
parking
signs
that
really
don't
draw
your
attention.
If
you're
driving
around
here's,
one
of
the
10
block
south
broadway
10
block
first
avenue
northeast,
that's
by
doc's
bar.
E
E
A
E
Lightsaber
all
right
we'll
be
talking
we'll
get
you
a
ladder,
so
just
some
examples
of
what
the
parking
lots
this
one's
well
lit,
but
there
are
some
around
that
are
rather
dark.
This
person
pointed
out,
or
not
this
one,
but
this
one
could
use
some
more
lighting
and
feel
free
to
stop
me
if
you
want
to
look
at
any
of
these
pictures
closer.
E
E
G
Not
a
bad
idea,
let
me
look
at
it
a
different
way.
Every
time,
I'm
in
a
big
city
where
I'm
going,
I
look
for
the
blue
sign
with
the
white
p
on
it.
That's
that's
almost,
I
won't
say
international,
but
it's
a
national
parking
sign
and
I
look
for
that.
Every
time
I'm
traveling
somewhere
kind
of
a
universal
sign.
G
I
would
consider
something
like
that
because
they
don't
have
to
educate
people
on
it
and
you
may
be
getting
to
this.
The
other
thing
is,
I
think
that
there
ought
to
be
a
real
inexpensive
flyer,
put
together
with
a
very
clear
colored
map
that
each
business
can
hand
out
and
start
training
the
public.
It's
a
great.
E
G
I
E
We're
going
to
show
you
a
couple
examples
that
rob
found
that
might
strike
your
interest,
but
we
they
also
talked
about
striping
all
the
parking
lots
in
the
arrow
purple
paint.
We
just
discussed
that
and
I
don't
know
if
we
can
get
that
light
of
a
purple
to
show
up
on
the
asphalt
and
rob
can
touch
base
on
that.
But
I
thought
that
was
also
a
clever
idea
that
if
you
had
the
park
public
parking
lot
striped
in
purple
it's.
It
would
be
blatantly
obvious
that
that's
your
public
lot.
J
E
N
N
We
were
looking
at
something
kind
of
unique
to
watertown,
with
possibly
doing
public
parking
lots
in
purple,
and
that
would
just
be
basically
a
way
that
people
locally
could
tell
people
come
to
town,
just
look
for
the
purple
lot
and
the
stripes.
We
were
looking
at
doing
having
colors
mixed
just
to
do
a
specific
purple
for
the
lots
which
would
have
to
be
a
lighter
purple.
I
think
for
them
to
show
up
on
newer
or
old
asphalt
or
concrete
parking
lots
as
well.
N
What
we
have
here
on
the
left
sign.
It
was
just
basically
a
more
a
public
parking,
but
talking
about
naming
the
lots
in
town
because
there's
a
lot
of
times.
People
refer
to
like
sparky's
lot
or
you
know
the
auditorium
lot
or
something
like
that.
But
we
don't
have
any
official
name
that
I
know
of
for
any
of
these
lots,
so
that
would
help
local
people
and
possibly
people
if
we
do
flyers
like
that,
if
you
name
the
lots,
you
see
on
the
sign.
N
Okay,
that's
midway
lot
right
there,
that's
the
one
I'm
looking
for
and
then
the
center
one
was
just
basically
a
public
parking
sign
and
then
on
the
right
one.
I
saw
a
lot
of
signs
in
online.
That
said,
free
public
parking,
so
people
weren't
it
was
just
they
didn't-
have
to
worry
about
paying
or
anything
like
that.
It
was
on
the
sign
then
below.
N
Basically,
we
would
have
the
72
hour
parking
and
then
the
ordinance
number,
which
that
is
not
the
ordinance
number,
that's
just
a
dummy
number
but
and
then,
as
far
as
sizes,
we
were
looking
at,
probably
the
the
minimum
size
size
you
would
want
to
sign
like
that
is
two
foot
by
three
foot.
We
think,
if
you're
driving
down-
let's
say,
you're
driving
down
first
avenue
north
here
and
you're,
looking
for
public
parking
halfway
down
the
block,
we
think
you
could
see
those
signs
at
150
feet
away.
N
K
N
N
You
know
at
an
intersection
when
you're
trying
to
find
it
down
the
block,
because
a
lot
of
people
drive
by
slow
and
see
if
they
can
see
a
sign
or
something
down
the
way,
and
we
would
put
them
back
to
back
out
into
the
sidewalk
area
by
possibly
you
know
it
can't
be
directly
in
the
center
of
the
sidewalk
area,
but
maybe
near
the
light
poles
in
line
with
those
or
somewhat
in
line.
So
you
could
see
them
from
down
the
block.
E
Yeah,
so
for
a
low
cost,
I
mean
we
can
encourage
people
to
start
using
these
public
lots
and
and
clear
some
spots
for
the
businesses
that
need
them.
That
was
phase
one
so
phase
one
was
again
to
strike
the
parking
lots,
put
up
the
signs
and
the
hour
limit
phase
two
is
to
repair,
improve
and
add
lighting
to
the
parking
lots
that
need
it.
A
L
A
N
I
B
B
E
A
I
I'll
toss
out
too
some
of
the
concerns
that
came
up
with
it
and
why
some
of
the
folks
were
parking
on
the
street,
like
that
was
the
pursuit
perceived
not
being
safe
in
the
public
lots.
A
lot
of
them
were
talking
about
the
lighting
not
being
quite
right.
There
was
a
big
number
of
them
who
just
didn't
know
there
were
public
lots
or
where
to
go
to
get
to
them.
I
So
that
was
some
of
the
issue
that
was
going
on
our
main
streets
like
camp
broadway,
maple
they're
well
lit,
but
once
you
tuck
through
alleys
and
stuff,
it
gets
a
little
dark
and
there's
some
perceived
risk
there.
So
we're
trying
to
find
the
remedies
to
kind
of
make
that
a
little
more
comfortable
for
people
and
give
them
a
solution
to
it.
N
Right
now
we're
working
on
finding
out
if
we
can
get
these
signs
done
through
our
sign
vendor
that
we
get
most
of
our
regulatory
signs
through,
but
we're
still
waiting
to
hear
back
from
there's
two
of
them
we
deal
with
and
we're
still
waiting
to
hear
back
from
one
of
them
and
then
this
type
of
sign.
You
know
when
you
look
like
locally.
I
think
a
lot
are
two
sign
vendors
in
town
that
I'm
aware
of
work
on
vendor
type
signage,
but
this
type
of
signage.
They
could
probably
do
it.
N
N
I
A
little
off
topic
from
that,
but
the
other
thing
we're
pursuing
is
integration
with
google
maps
so
that
you
can
just
google
where
these
are,
and
you
can
find
it
on
your
phone
just
to
help
it
out.
It'll,
be
nice
too.
If
we
get
a
naming
convention
going
to
plug
that
in,
but
a
lot
of
times
you
can
designate
these
locations
pretty
easily.
A
B
C
Other
advantage-
and
maybe
it
was
obvious
but
not,
but
when
you
have
a
name
on
your
lot,
so
if
you're
having
an
event
or
you're
having
a
party
or
you're
going
to
do
something
you
can
put
right
in
the
brochure
or
your
invitation
or
whatever
park
in
the
midway
lot
right
on
the
corner
whatever,
so
that
the
naming
the
lots
is
really.
I
think,
an
important
part
of
this,
and
you
know
if
we
can't
duke
it
out
for
the
bots.
Maybe
we
can
have
an
even
a
naming
contest.
C
B
J
B
O
B
E
L
M
L
Okay,
heath.
Thank
you,
mayor,
platt
of
river
ridge,
eighth
edition
I've
shared
my
screen
to
show
the
platte
extents
just
another
phase
up
in
river
ridge
on
the
north
end
of
town
and
pretty
straightforward
plat
approval
here.
The
corresponding
development
agreement
is,
with
this
plat
that's
been
reviewed
by
staff
and
includes
all
the
pertinent
items
regarding
the
public
infrastructure
components.
L
So
we
left
it
as
a
private
ownership
and
maintenance
in
the
meantime
for
the
developer
to
maintain
they
will
be
building
out
2nd
street
northwest
in
a
similar
fashion.
As
to
what
was
built
south
of
here,
it'll
be
an
extension
of
that
half
street
section
and
meet
the
city's
engineering
design,
design
standards
for
half
road
construction,
otherwise
pretty
straightforward
and
we'll
stand
by
for
any
questions.
A
We
do
have
a
collector
road
and
I
I
don't
think
we
should
be
vague
about
which
street,
when
we
have
corner
lots
that
I
think
that
should
be
memorialized,
that
people
don't
get
access
onto
the
collector
routes,
so
it
just.
This
is
a
basic,
doesn't
even
say
the
road
just
says
when
you
get
a
building
permit,
that's
when
your
access
will
be
determined
I'd
prefer
it
to
be
more
explicit
unless
it's,
unless
it
doesn't
matter
in
this
case
it
matters
because
we
have
a
collector
out.
A
Not
get
access
on
the
second
street
right,
so
the
the
way
the
access
certificate
could
be
written
is
each
lot
will
be
allowed
to
have
one
access
point
onto
riley
drive,
except
for
lots,
1
and
23,
which
may
have
two
accesses
one
on
to
riley,
one
on
to
cheyenne
and
lot
12
has
one
access
on
the
cheyenne.
I
mean:
that's
that's
how
we've
written
them
in
the
past.
A
L
A
A
And
then
I
this
just
a
question
on
how
you
check
on
I
like
that
you've
got
in
the
development
agreement
that
the
developer
shall
complete
the
grading
of
all
utility,
easements
and
drainage
ways
to
within
two-tenths
feet
of
the
elevation,
as
shown
on
the
approved
final
grading
plan.
I
know
that's
been
a
big
problem
for
utilities
when
the
grading
is
not
close
to
the
grading
plan
they
put
in
maybe
a
gas
service,
and
then
the
law
either
gets
cut
down
and
exposes
a
service
or
four
feet
of
fill
goes
on
it
and
it's
too
deep.
A
L
L
Now
these
are
components
that
we've
gotten
hit
or
miss
in
the
past,
but
getting
a
good
set
of
record
drawings
that
show
how
the
development
was
built
and
how
it
was
graded
out
helps
make
this
process
easy.
You
check
that
off
then
against
the
design.
Excuse
me
the
design
plans
just
to
ensure
that
all
the
everything
was
built
as
it
was
approved
to
be
so
that's
what
I
can
envision
doing
in
the
future.
But
right
now
it's
a
matter
of
field
inspection.
L
The
staff
are
going
out
walking
through
the
site
with
the
developers
engineer
they
are.
They
have
the
approved
set
of
plans
with
them.
They
also
have
a
final
approved
copy
of
the
development
agreement
with
them
and
they're
checking
off
each
of
these
components
as
they
walk
through
the
site.
At
the
time
of
the
completion
of
the
improvements,
and
so
that's
that's
how
I'd
summarize,
how
we've
been
doing
it
in
the
recent
past.
A
L
Part
of
we
receive
a
grading
plan
at
the
preliminary
phase,
where
you
get
some
overlap,
grading
type
of
ideas
on
what
how
it's
going
to
be
graded.
We
also
get
a
more
specific
or
detailed
grading
plan.
What
the
construction
plans
and
those
that
full
set
of
construction
plan
is
what
we
target
to
have
approved
before
the
plan
is
approved.
A
B
I
just
have
a
question:
maybe
it's
for
tim
toomey,
but
as
the
summer
rolls
in
it
seems
like.
Drivers
also
have
a
little
tendency
to
speed
up
and
a
couple
weeks
ago,
glenn
brought
up
that
there
was
some
he
had
specifically
mentioned
out
by
sharp
chevrolet.
There
was
kind
of
a
speeding
issue,
changing
of
the
speeds
and
so
on.
B
Well,
since
that
it
prompted
a
couple
people
around
my
area
to
especially
talk
about
the
dangerous
parts
over
northwest
lake
compesca,
where
that
speed
zone
is
40
miles
an
hour
there,
but
it's
pretty
easy
to
get
a
good
head
of
steam
there
and
go
more
than
40,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
just
maybe
it's
just.
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
a
question
of
what
can
be
done
or
just
an
awareness
that
a
couple
of
people
have
mentioned
to
me
that
there
are
really
concerns.
E
Yeah,
I
I
share
those
same
concerns
and
I
appreciate
the
comment
or
question.
We
are
doing
a
lot
more
there.
It's
part
of
our
strategic
plan.
It
was
just
today
that
we
had
an
officer
out
there
right
on
highway,
139
they're
making
stops
in
in
the
40
and
we're
like
I'll
leave.
I
mean
how
fast
are
they
going
if
they're
going
making
stops
in
the
40s?
So
we
have
increased
enforcement
around
the
lake
specific
enforcement.
E
I
A
E
I
I
I
B
I
A
That's
an
excellent
idea.
We
did
talk
about
that
and
I
think
that
chris
shilkin,
when
he
was
the
director
of
watertown
development
company,
did
bring
that
up
a
little
bit
and
chris
and
I
talked
about
it
at
length
about
you
know.
If
we
were
to
develop
some
city
land
into
affordable
housing
that
we
would
do
an
rfp.
I
think
that
would
be
an
excellent
thing
to
do.
I.
I
I
A
A
I
A
I
Then
second
thing
was
just:
does
anyone
know
what
we
would
need
to
do
to
get
some
recycling
options
at
a
community?
Events
such
as
thursday
night
live
because
we've
got
a
lot
of
aluminum
cans
appearing
and
so
right
now
we're
just
they're
getting
thrown
away
it'd
be
good
to
see
them
just
going
to
recycling
instead.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
could
get
some
recycling
bins
down
there
or
something
yeah.
I
L
L
A
L
Mayor
I
had
a
brief
update
on
the
airport
items
sure
if
I
could
just
a
quick
update
to
the
council,
because
you'll
be
seeing
some
advertisements
for
bids
coming
out
here
this
week.
If
you
recall,
we've
got
two
main
components
left
for
the
airport
terminal
project.
One
is
the
civil
site
work
kind
of
the
phase
two
of
the
main
terminal
project,
we've
gotten
direction
from
the
faa
to
go
ahead
and
proceed
with
bidding
that
phase
of
the
work
they
wanted
us
to.
L
So
come
june,
8th
and
15th
we'll
have
advertising
for
those
bids
june
22nd
we'll
have
a
pre-bid
meeting
here
at
city
hall
and
june.
24Th
is
the
cut-off
date
for
bitter
questions,
and
then
that
gets
us
set
up
for
june
29th
bid
opening
date
for
the
phase
two
of
the
terminal
and
a
july
1st
bid
opening
date
for
the
snow
removal
equipment
and
just
wanted
to
provide
that
update
to
the
council.
So
when
you
see
that
information
coming
out,
you
know
what
it's
about.