►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment - 2-24-2022
Description
Board of Adjustment - 2-24-2022
A
A
B
D
A
B
A
B
B
If
this
hatched
area
would
be
allowed
to
have
the
conditional
use
of
a
caretaker's
residence,
it
would
be
conditioned
that
it
would
have
to
also
be
rezoned
to
i1
light
industrial,
because
we
don't
allow
caretakers
residences
in
the
i2
district,
and
that
was
just
from
the
recent
ordinance
amendment.
So
it
is
typical.
You
know
that
you
would
have
the
the
i2
and
the
i1
transition
amongst
each
other
and
the
applicant
and
the
owner
of
this
is
grand
guard
construction
and
then
that
would
be
jeremiah
and
heather
grangard.
E
A
E
E
B
E
B
E
E
B
B
A
Yeah,
I
guess
just
looking
at
the
i1
permitted
uses
the
the
use
that
they
do
have
on
the
proposed.
Rezoned
area
does
fit
within
the
permitted
uses
of
an
i1.
So
in
reality
I
think
the
consideration
should
be
you
know,
can
can
the
caretaker
residence
be
appropriate
for
that
use
explicitly,
since
that's
the
lot
under
consideration,
whether
or
not
they
also
support
the
i2
is,
I
think,
irrelevant
in
the
scheme
of
how
we
can
approve
a
conditional
use
for
the
caretaker's
residence.
I'm.
E
Looking
at
from
the
perspective
that
you
know,
we
have
adjoining
residential
property
to
the
south
on
the
fertilizer
plant
and
when
any
changes
to
that
i2
property.
You
know
we
dealt
with
a
very
contentious
issue
last
year
when
we
had
residences
in
close
proximity
to
the
i2
zone,
and
what
we're
doing
here
in
essence,
is
we're
putting
a
residence
in
the
middle
of
an
i2
zone
as
well,
and
so
my
only
biggest
concern
is
going
to
be
is
what
happens
to
the
property?
E
That's
i2
to
the
north
and
east
of
this
someday,
when
the
grand
guards
don't
own
that
property
or
grant
guards
sell
that
house
to
save
me,
and
somebody
else
does
something
on
that
proposed
to
an
i2
intensive
use
to
the
north.
Does
this
easement,
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
read
it
yet?
Does
it
deal
with
that?
That's
my
question.
D
E
F
D
E
E
I'm
not
arguing
against
it.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
city
has
no
exposure
when
the
i2
lands
to
the
north
and
the
east
change
hands.
That
somebody
wants
to
do
something
objectionable
which
would
be
allowed
in
an
i2
zone,
but
in
proximity
to
an
eye
one
caretaker's
residence,
which
maybe
that
business
goes
away
at
some
point
in
time.
And
then
you
do
to
have
just
a
house
and
somebody
with
a
horse
and
using
that
machine
shed
as
a
stable.
E
A
A
A
E
Well,
the
answer
would
be.
The
answer
would
be
no,
but
that's
my
point
again
we're
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
ifs,
ands
and
buts
in
what's
going
on
here
and
we're
treating
this
one
particular
use.
That's
just
going
to
be
a
standalone
use
and
it's
never
going
to
change,
but
things
always
do
change,
and
so
that's
where
I'm
just
making
sure
that
we
are
on
sound
foundation
that
we
don't
have
to
be
telling
somebody
mr
grangard,
sells
it
to
stacy
and
five
years
later.
E
You
know,
stacy
doesn't
have
a
mechanic
shop
there
or
doesn't
intend
to
have
one
of
the
i1
businesses
listed
there,
but
just
still
wants
to
live
in
this
house,
because
it's
not
a
caretaker
residence
can
be
anything.
It
could
be
a
three-quarter
million
dollar
house
or
it
can
be
somebody
living
in
the
shed
right.
B
E
B
E
G
Mr
chair,
this
is
stacy
if
I
could
just
jump
in
for
a
second
here.
Thank
you.
I
understand
where
commissioner
case
is
coming
from,
because
it
it
may
be
a
little
bit
unusual
to
have
a
separately
platted
lot
with
just
a
caretaker's
residence,
so
that
could
be
sold
at
some
point
in
time
without
the
business
on
there.
So
I
think
it
is
a
relative
question
or
relevant
question
rather
to
ask
mr
grangard
if
he
intends
to
have
a
business
on
that
particular
lot,
where
the
caretakers
you
know
will
be
all
right.
D
H
So
I
guess
I'd
be
willing
to
make
it
secure
as
saying
that
we
would
not
be
selling
the
property
oak
valley
is
a
is
a
is
going
to
be
a
business
for
probably
ever
that's
what
that
land
is
out
there.
Our
intentions
are
to
build
more
shops
and
do
more
of
that
activity
out
there,
and
I
we
could
leave
that.
That
is
that
the
house
would
never
be
sold
with
that
business.
That
would
always
remain
as
what
you
guys
would
accept.
H
And
if
it
did
sell,
that
would
probably
be
more
enticing
for
somebody
to
buy
the
business,
because
there
would
be
so
much
activity
there
that
they
could.
They
would
be
able
to
stay
there,
and
I
mean
we
could.
Maybe,
if
you
guys
would
accept
like
a
rental,
you
know
the
person
could
rent
it.
You
know
also
it
you
know
if
they
didn't
want
to
say
somebody
bought
it
and
they
could
rent
it
to
somebody
that
works
for
them
that
bought
that
company
that
place.
You
know
for
say.
E
I
wouldn't
have
an
issue.
I
think
this
is
a
plausible
solution,
well,
that
you
can
straight
face
say
that
there's
a
long
range
ability
to
handle
those
situations
in
the
future,
on
trent,
on
transfer
of
property
and
if
and
again,
whether
it's,
the
person
that
owns
the
business
or
has
a
worker,
that's
renting,
he's
renting.
It
too.
I
think
that
meets
our
our
rules
right
brandy,.
G
Yep,
mr
chair,
if
I
could
interject
one
more
time,
please
it's
stacy.
I
just
wanted
to
also
just
add
to
the
conversation
that,
even
though
it
would
be
plotted
off
separately,
we
could
use
something
like
a
development
law
agreement
or
restrictive
covenant
that
could
be
filed
basically
saying
that
the
lots
would
transfer
together.
G
F
B
D
C
Now
we're
talking
about
putting
a
standalone
three
bedroom
house
right
next
to
that
three
bedrooms
means
children,
the
water.
There
is
an
attractive
feature,
but
I
think
right
next
to
that
railroad
spur
that
fertilizer
plant.
I
have
a
big
issue
with
safety
concerns
and
it's
also
my
recollection
that
we've
had
other
requests
for
caretaker
residents.
D
F
F
We
have
a
lot
of
other
industrial
plants
in
town
that
aren't
putting
people
living
at
them
because
they're
concerned
about
theft
or
vandalism
or
what
have
you
you
know:
terex,
isn't
putting
up
a
a
caretaker's
home
on
their
property
because
they're
concerned
of
that,
so
where
this
is
situated,
I
guess
I
I'm
I'm
concerned
about.
You
know
the
fertilizer.
B
That
the
three
bedroom
round,
I
think
that
you're
looking
at
in
the
packet
that
was
a
previous
building
permit,
that
was
issued
in
2013
and
it
was
never
completed.
And
then
so
that
was
and
that's
when
it
was
a
permitted
use
in
the
i2
district.
And
then
we
changed
it
just
recently
in
2020
to
have
it
be
the
conditional
use
so
that
we
would
be
able
to
monitor
where
these
were
going.
Because.
F
So,
to
my
point,
a
caretaker
residence
to
me
is
is
someone
that's
standing
guard
24
7,
whatever
you
of
whether
these
people
switch
off,
you
need
a
bed,
you
need
a
kitchenette,
you
know,
and
the
next
guy
takes
his
shift.
That,
to
me
is
a
caretaker
residence.
Not
you
know
full-fledged
living
quarters.
F
H
H
H
Very
important,
you
know,
the
thing
is:
we've
owned
that
place
for
10
12
years
and
our
children
have
been
out
there
and
there's
children
around
that
area.
It
is
kind
of
a
dangerous
area,
maybe
with
the
river
tracks
that
are
ways
away
and
there
is
truck
traffic
there.
I've
never
we've
not
had
any
accidents
per
se.
There
I
mean
yet.
I
guess
I
understand,
there's
a
safety
concern.
D
D
From
a
you
know,
fire
and
safety
standpoint
as
far
as
access
to
that
area,
you
know,
I
said
I've
been
out
there
different
numerous
times
when
it
was
previously
when
oak
valley
farms
was
there
for
different
types
of
calls
as
far
as
access
with
our
ambulances
with
our
trucks,
I
don't
yeah
I've
spoken
with
adam
on
this
and
we
don't
see
any
safety
concerns
as
access
to
that
area
or
you
know
any
type
of
firefighting
activities.
You
know
ambience
as
far
as
any
of
those
duties
out
there.
D
I
said
I
I
I
agree
to
that.
I
mean
there's
obviously
being
in
the
area.
It
is
with
railroad
tracks
fertilizer
plant
across
the
street.
Yes,
sir,
you
know,
there's
obvious
safety
issues
there,
but
you
know,
on
the
other
end
too
agriculture
coming
from
a
farm.
There's
safety
issues
there
all
the
time
so
yeah
we
don't
see
a
problem
as
far
as
access
with
trucks
and
ambulance.
E
E
B
And
that
we've
seen
before
that,
it's
basically
the
conditional
conditional
use
because
for
the
applicant
to
know
to
move
forward
they
they
need
to
know
if
the
use
is
allowed
for
one.
Otherwise,
then
they
might,
they
would
have
other
plans
for
the
property
and
so
we've
we
have
seen
those
we've
we've
done
this
before.
E
E
C
B
It
does
it
does
in
the
comp
plan,
it's
just
specified
as
industrial,
so
you
know
we
can
have
the
transitional
zoning
or
intermix
of
industrial
with
the
i1
and
i2,
and
the
i2
is
basically
it
is
the
i1
district,
but
that
it
has
allowances
for
conditional
uses
which
then
the
board
would
have
to
approve
everything.
That's
a
permitted
use
in
the
i1
is
only
a
permitted
use
in
the
i2.
Then
everything
else
an
i2
has
to
get
a
conditional
use
for.
C
So
the
bottom
line
is,
I
see
it
is
that
we're
talking
about
pocket
zoning
i1
and
we
have
them
tentative
agreement
from
some
of
the
speakers
that
there
are
some
safety
issues
out
there
with
railroad
tracks
and
fertilizer
plants.
Notwithstanding
that
you
would
also
find
that
on
a
farm.
We,
as
as
my
vote,
goes
I'm
voting
on
this
specific
property,
not
what
a
farmer
does
on
his
farm
and
what
the
city
looks
at
when
it
relates
to
safety.
B
And
for
diana
and
blake
online,
I
shared
I
passed
this
and
just
anyone
else.
Online
too,
I
shared
the
industrial,
easement
and
waiver,
a
setback
from
existing
i2
heavy
industrial
district
uses,
and
that's
what
I
passed
out
to
the
board
just
for
full
awareness
of
language
that
could
that
could
be
implemented
as
well
to
run
with
the
property.
C
A
D
A
So
from
a
standpoint
of
how
many
i1
lots,
you
could
plat
in
there
you're
talking
seven
plus
meeting
the
minimum
lot
square
square
area
requirements
for
the
I-1
district.
So
I
don't
know
that
I
can
constitute
that
as
pocket
zoning
in
that
standpoint,
but
that
doesn't
alleviate
the
the
other
concerns
that
you
raised.
C
E
A
H
I
just
want
to
make
one
note:
the
railroad
tracks
are
quite
a
ways
from
that
property.
Right
I
mean
there's
a
slough
there,
a
road
there
is
farm
houses
that
are
further
down
the
road
that
are
near
there,
the
children,
whoever
did
live
there
or
how
it
would
be
for
us
were
out
there.
Anyway.
I
mean
I've
lived
there,
we've
pretty
much,
not
lived
there,
but
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time
out
there,
regardless
of
the
railroad
tracks.
The
truck
traffic
in
front
you
know
there
are.
There
is
trucks
that
drive
by
there.
H
H
B
And
was
that
to
incorporate
the
mechanic
shop
so
that
it
would?
And
if
we
do,
if
you
guys
want
to
do
that,
the
deed
restriction
or
the
covenant
that
the
properties
would
run
together,
type
of
thing
too.
But
I
was
thinking
that
it
was
so
that
the
mechanic
shop,
the
business,
would
be
on
that
property.
A
I
I
have
a
question
if
that's
okay,
blake
yeah,
so
I'm
reading
the
caretaker's
residence-
and
I
know
brandy-
read
it
out
loud,
but
it
just
kind
of
got.
Has
me
confused
a
little
bit
because
the
the
definition
is
two
sentences
and
the
first
sentence
says
a
single
family
dwelling
unit
and
the
second
sentence
starts
with
the
individual
residing
at
this
residence.
So
I
guess
is
our
thoughts
for
what
a
caretaker's
residence
is.
Is
it
for
a
single
family
or
is
it
for
an
individual?
I
E
F
Well,
I
guess
getting
back
to
what
I'm
that's,
what
I'm
saying
it
to
me,
a
caretaker
when
you
say
a
caretaker.
It
is
the
guard
man
at
the
door
at
the
gate,
not
a
family,
not
him
and
his
buddies.
Not
it's
someone
in
hired
that
works
for
me
that
lives
in
the
house.
The
little
apartment
I'm
going
to
call
an
apartment,
I'm
going
to
call
it
a
kitchenette
and
a
cot.
It
is
not
his
permanent
residence
when
I'm
on
duty,
I'm
watching
the
gate.
F
That's
caretaker
to
me-
and
I
think
that
this
and
nothing
I
mean
they
said
down
the
road
we're
going
to
have
more
we've
had
these
already.
So
I
think
we
need
to.
We
need
to
clean
our
books
and
say
what
are
we
opening
ourselves
up
for?
If
we
want
kids
living
everywhere,
then
why
do
we
have
any
rules?
Let's
just
you
know,
open
the
gates
and
let
everybody
live
in
their
their
contractor
shops.
F
I
I
I'm
just
I'm
having
a
real
issue
just
like
diana.
We
need
to
make
a
definition
here.
I'm
sure
he
does
a
great
business.
It's
nothing
personal!
It's
I
just
don't
want
to
see
us
up
here
every
other
week
allowing
children
to
live
in
industrial
settings.
That
is
not
what
we're
here
for
I
get
it
there's
farms.
I
grew
up
on
a
farm.
I
grew
up
in
an
industrial
setting
and
that
maybe
would
explain
a
lot
of
things.
H
I
And
when
I
ask
the
question
I
just
kind
of
liked
how
to
say
looking
into
perpetuity,
I
mean
if
we
build
a
house
there,
you
know
we
don't
know
who
the
next
person
will
be
or
people
will
be.
You
know,
and
so
that's
kind
of
how
I
look
at
I
mean
I,
you
know
you'll
probably
be
there,
for
you
know
20
30,
40
years,
who
knows,
but
you
know
at
some
point,
someone
else
will
be
there
and
if
it
is
a
house,
they
are
more
likely
to
have.
You
know
a
different
family
too.
A
E
I
I
guess
to
me:
I
look
at
it
when
I'm
looking
at
that
definition,
I'm
looking
at
two
things.
The
structure
itself
is
the
single
family
dwelling
unit.
That's
how
I
read
that
this
first
sentence
is
that
I'm
I'm
not
building
a
duplex.
Now,
I'm
not
building
a
triplex,
I'm
building
a
single
family
unit
and
then
who
lives
in
that
unit
is
the
second,
and
that
has
to
be
somebody,
that's
related
to
the
work
to
the
business.
E
E
And
again
back
to
where
I'm
at
you
know
the
safety
aspect,
it's
not
that
I'm
not
concerned
about
the
safety
aspect
of
it.
I'm
looking
at
more
of
how
this
moves
forward
in
perpetuity
and
if,
when
we
get
to
the
point
of
of
making
a
motion,
I
will
make
a
motion
or
support
a
motion
to
approve,
subject
to
some
sort
of
legal
piece
of
paper.
E
That
says
those
properties
will
be
sold
together
or
that
there
has
or
if
there
has
to
be
a
business
associated
with
this
single-family
dwelling
unit
forever
or
the
single-family
dwelling
unit
goes
away.
How
that
language
is
crafted
in
a
legal
form.
That's
you
know
they
can
withstand
the
test
of
time.
That's
beyond
me,
but
that's
that's
something
that
I
would
support.
E
I
move
approval
of
the
request,
as
submitted
subject
to
the
applicant
signing
at
least
a
document
containing
the
information
provided
in
the
industrial,
easement
and
waiver
of
setback
from
existing
i2
heavy
industrial
district
uses
with
an
additional
codicil
to
be
constructed
by
staff
that
stipulates
the
building
dwelling
unit
caretaker
residence
has
to
be
transferred
in
tandem
with
a
business
or
one
of
the
a
piece
of
the
property
of
the
adjoining
i2.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
on
that
i2.
A
E
B
I
B
I
D
A
D
B
A
A
A
G
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
this
board
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
allow
me
to
serve
as
your
manager
for
the
past
year
and
a
half.
It's
meant
a
lot
to
me.
I
have
accepted
another
position
in
ada
oklahoma
and
I
will
be
leaving
my
last
day
will
be
march
4th,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
and
I
really
appreciate
all
of
your
dedication
that
you
have
for
this
community.
G
It's
been
an
absolute
pleasure
to
work
with
you
and
just
wanted
to
encourage
you
to
keep
serving
your
community
as
you
as
you
are
you're.
You've
done
a
fantastic
job
and
I
just
feel
very
honored
and
blessed
to
have
been
a
part
of
it.
There
have
been
a
lot
of
accomplishments
that
we
couldn't
have
done
without
this
board
and
staff
and
the
city
council
and
everyone.
So
it
definitely
was
the
toughest
decision
of
my
career,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
so
much.
I
very
much
appreciate
it.
We.
G
G
You
it's
been
an
absolute
honor
and
privilege
to
be
able
to
work
with
the
staff
here
and
the
boards
and
and
everyone
because
I've
just
never.
I've
worked
in
multiple
city
governments
and
I
in
multiple
states
now,
and
I
just
have
never
seen
such
a
hard-working,
dedicated
bunch
of
people
that
really
want
to
serve
their
community.
So
it's
just
been
an
honor
for
me
to
be
a
part
of
that.
So
thank
you.