►
From YouTube: Executive, 18 May 2017
Description
AGENDA (To view individual agenda items click on the links below)
1. Declarations of Interest 00:04:30
2. Exclusion of Press and Public 00:04:43
3. Minutes 00:05:25
4. Public Participation 00:05:40
5. Forward Plan 00:19:48
6. Science City York 00:20:01
7. Highways Funding Overview 00:23:10
8. Budget 2017 Discretionary Rate Relief Policy & Enterprise Zone Policy 00:47:16
9. Shared Ownership Affordable Housing Programme 01:06:12
10. Park & Ride Operator Procurement 01:19:00
For full agenda, attendance details and supporting documents visit:
http://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=733&MId=9313
D
Second,
item
is
exclusion
of
press
and
public.
I
don't
think
there
are
any
issues
that
warrant
exclusion,
the
press
and
public
tonight
other
other
annex
to
okay.
Yes,
right
well
I'll
deal
with
that
at
the
time.
It
relates
to
agenda
item
10
and
I'll.
Do
a
preamble
before
we
get
to
that
item
he
does.
It
does
contain
material
information
which
is
commercially
confidential.
So
if
we
need
to
discuss
the
pink
pages
in
this
report
and
I'm
going
to
have
to
exclude
the
press
in
public
I-
think
that's
pretty
standard
procedure,
probably
understood
by
everyone
now.
D
D
E
E
I've
been
requested
to
attend
by
members
of
my
parish
council
to
express
our
concern
of
the
executive
member
for
transporting
planning's
DC,
made
on
the
meeting
of
May
the
11th
to
prove
a
pedestrian
scream
on
your
career,
strengthen
the
decision
was
made
despite
my
colleague,
councillor
Laurence,
Matteson
attending
and
expressing
serious
concerns
about
the
validity
of
the
evidence
provided
by
highway
staff,
in
particular
the
over
estimation
of
the
likely
speeds
of
pedestrian
crossing
the
road
and
the
subsequent
reduction
of
transit
times.
I
also
feel
the
summary
presented
to
the
executive.
Member
of
my
councils.
E
Response
was
somewhat
selective
in
picking
out
any
positives.
The
full
response
indicated
that
were
unanimously
not
supportive,
wanted
a
proper
pedestrian
crossing
stressfull
Parish
Council
raised
the
matter.
Its
annual
parish
meeting,
which
was
attended
by
a
member
of
the
highways
engineering
team
members
of
the
public
from
the
wider
village
questioned
er
and
made
comments.
I
think
it'd
be
fair.
To
conclude,
the
response
to
the
scheme
was
not
favorable
at
all
help
suggest.
The
very
limited
reply
to
the
council's
consultation
suggests
that
this
is
not
representative
of
the
village
as
a
whole.
E
Far
too
few
houses
having
been
consulted,
the
proposed
scheme
costs
from
17,000
up
for
the
basic
model
up
to
34,000
for
the
full
scheme.
While
investments
of
this
kind
of
money
is
welcomed
in
a
village
which
often
seems
neglected
when
facilities
are
allocated
by
the
council
where's,
the
parish
council
feel
this
scheme
gives
the
illusion
of
safety
for
the
girls
crossing
York
Road,
whilst
in
practice
providing
none.
We
feel
the
money
could
be
far
better
spent
for
the
price
of
stage
1
&
2.
E
We
could
get
the
pedestrian
crossing
the
we
acts
want
in
order
to
provide
a
genuinely
safe
crossing
point.
The
Parish
Council
was
generally
surprised
by
the
data
gathered
by
the
council
for
car
use
of
your
curb,
which
is
now
experienced
an
extremely
busy
road
during
both
the
morning
and
evening
rush
hours
during
school
run
times
and
for
through
traffic.
During
the
day,
the
low
level
of
pedestrian
use
was
less
surprising,
as
the
frequent
difficulty
experienced
by
the
elderly
in
crossing
safely
drives
main
to
use
the
cars.
E
E
Stressful
parish,
council
feels
the
presently
approved
scheme
spend
significant
amounts
of
public
money
without
addressing
the
problem
providing
genuine
safety
for
pedestrians.
We
also
feel
it
will
not
benefit
the
street
scene
30
years
ago,
as
a
they're
nervous
young
counselor
attending
my
first
meeting
at
Rydell
District
Council
I
was
given
some
really
good
fatherly
advice
by
most
eminent
counselors
ever
to
serve
the
York
area,
councilor
Bob
Eccles,
who
served
rock
in
50
years
at
all
levels
of
local
governments,
30.
D
E
Officially,
he
advised
me
to
listen
to
the
parish
councils.
They
know
their
area,
it
was
the
best
advice.
I
ever
got
I
urge
you
to
do
the
same
and
voluntarily
refer
this
decision
back
for
further
consideration.
So
we
can
get
a
scheme
that
both
this
council
and
my
council
can
happily
agree
on.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
A
D
F
Thank
you,
chair,
and
also
the
local
York
at
cycle
campaign,
we'd
like
to
express
support
for
the
cycling
elements
of
this
report
proposed
expenditure
and
tonight
I
just
like
to
pick
up
on
two
particular
threads.
Firstly,
it
mentions
an
extension
of
the
pothole
spotting
technology,
which
is
to
be
fitted
to
dustbin
lorries.
The
report
helpfully
confirms
that
coverage
will
include
carriageway
margins
where
cyclists
often
ride
and
which
are
frequently
white
line,
does
advisory
cycle
and
defects
in
these
areas
can
create
considerable
discomfort
and
even
danger
for
cyclists.
F
What
may
appear
to
be
a
shallow
rain
filled.
Puddle
could
actually
be
a
deep
pothole.
Cyclists
have
been
injured
and
killed,
and
local
authorities
sued
because
of
these
defects.
There
may
be
a
case
for
diverting
more
resources
into
improving
carriageway
margins,
particularly
where
these
are
used
for
advisory
cycle
lanes
or
form
part
of
recommended
cycle
routes.
The
photo
which
are
circulated
to
you
shows
the
outbound
advisory
lane
by
the
color
of
burial
ground.
F
The
white
line
markings
have
recently
been
refreshed
and
some
of
these
markings
have
being
painted
onto
the
exposed
base
course
of
the
road
where
the
surface
course
is
degraded
and
be
lost
share.
The
report
also
highlights
a
bid
to
the
Department
for
Transport
challenge
fund
to
repair
and
upgrade
the
Riverside
National
Cycle
Network
route
65
through
York.
We
may
be
the
only
City
to
bid
for
a
cycle
route
upgrade
to
this
fund.
I,
look
through
the
online
documentation
today
and
it's
evident.
F
It
complements,
or
the
projects
like
Scarborough
bridge
and
York
central,
and
if
it's
approved
by
the
DFT,
it
will
maximize
the
opportunity
for
sustainable
travel
by
residents,
and
it
will
also
maintain
York's
potential
to
attract
inward
cycle.
Tourism,
with
its
associated
local,
spend
I
commend
the
report
to
your
members.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
G
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
You,
chair
I'm,
here
once
again
to
challenge
our
the
park-and-ride
report
and
it's
disgraceful
failure
to
advise
the
executive
of
the
implications
of
the
recommended
options
for
the
council's
existing
low
emissions
strategy
and
air
quality
action
plan
3
and
for
the
health
of
York's
residents
and
visitors,
with
an
estimated
93
256
people
dying
each
year
from
air
pollution,
the
largest
proportion
of
which
is
attributable
to
traffic.
G
G
Is
it
because,
if
there's
a
proper
evaluation
of
the
costs
and
benefits
of
different
options,
such
as
electric
buses
as
recent
work
on
air
quality
and
bus
emissions
in
Bradford,
is
showing
the
benefits
of
cleaning
up
the
buses
in
this
city
run
into
the
millions
of
pounds?
And
though
York
is
roughly
half
the
size,
they
can
be
expected
to
be
equally
significant
here.
G
D
B
You
and
you've
heard
some
of
the
dramatic
evidence
as
to
the
implications
of
this
and
I.
Don't
intend
to
repeat
them,
but
I
do
want
to
congratulate
those
involved
in
actually
making
significant
improvements
on
the
original
specification.
The
euro-6
being
a
minimum
in
this
contract
means
it
will
meet
for
government's
criteria
for
a
clean
air
zone,
which
I
hope
the
council
will
move
on
very
quickly
to
get
in
place
in
York
as
a
minimum.
We
should
be
following
the
public
transport
based
model
that
Oxford,
Norwich
and
Brighton
have
already
got
in
place.
B
However,
this
is
not
the
zero
emission
capability
that
we
stated
in
our
government.
Third,
air
quality
option
plan,
2015
submission,
which
also
stated,
incidentally,
under
the
heading
of
challenges
and
I
quote:
there's
still
considerable
uncertainty
about
the
on-road
performance
of
Euro
six
vehicles.
If
Euro
six
vehicles
do
not
perform
as
expected
a
number
of
UK
zones
exceedingly
you
limit
values
by
2020
may
be
greater
than
currently
predicted,
and
that
was
stated
in
our
2015
report.
B
It's
also
disappointing
that,
while
the
fair
price
is
rightly
regulated
through
the
life
of
contract,
there's
no
expectation
to
require
vehicles
to
be
upgraded
to
zero
mission
within
a
set
time
scale,
meaning
that
vehicles
could
be
10
years
old
by
the
end
of
this
contract.
Given
that
hero
6
was
introduced
in
2014
at
the
least,
the
contract
should
state
that
your
clean
air
zone
will
be
will
require
zero
mission
capability,
which
would
include
hybrid
vehicles
by
2020
30.
B
Aspects
that
we
push
for
very
welcome,
such
as
overnight
parking
provision
as
gambar
the
funding
for
marketing
and
the
continued
park
and
pedal
scheme
and
the
Boxing
Day
service.
However,
it's
disappointing
that
late
running
on
a
Friday
and
Saturday
even
evening
hasn't
been
included,
which
again
would
have
helped
the
city
center
evening
economy
and
air
quality.
I
would
hope
that
we
can
still
convince
the
operator
to
trial
this
from
both
northern
and
southern
site
as
part
of
their
launch
package.
Okay,.
D
You
know
comments
will
be
noted
before
we
continue
on
to
the
rest
of
the
agenda.
I
see
that
tonight,
councillors,
Barnes
and
Craig
Hill
are
here
representing
their
respective
parties.
Whilst
I
have
no
desire
to
impede
contributions
from
opposition
parties,
the
invitation
to
attend
executive
is
extended
normally
and
only
to
leaders
of
those
groups.
If
the
leader
cannot
attend
that
I'm
prepared
to
allow
substitutes
to
attend,
but
only
in
special
circumstances,
which
by
definition,
will
be
infrequent
and
only
then
on
the
basis
that
I
am
notified
purse
they
have
their
wish
to
attend.
D
It
should
be
noted
that
executive
members
themselves
are
not
permitted
to
send
substitutes
you're
very
welcome
to
attend
this
evening.
That
is
carry
on
with
the
rest
of
the
meeting
item
five
Ford
plant,
page
nine,
two
members
of
any
comments
or
questions
around
that,
though
okay
can
we
go
on.
Then
next
item
is
science
city
York
on
page
13,.
H
Things
to
say,
essentially
technical
report
asking
the
executive
to
take
the
necessary
steps
so
that
we
may
transfer
the
residue
of
science
city
York
funding
to
make
it
York
when
mega
York
was
established,
the
science
city
functions
and
assets
were
transferred
to
make
it
York.
Apart
from
a
small
residue
that
was
tied
up
because
two
contracts
had
not
yet
been
formally
signed
off
by
DC
LG.
Those
matters
are
now
resolved
and
therefore
we
need
to
take
the
final
steps
to
transfer
the
remainder
of
the
assets,
so
they
can
be
used
for
their
intended
purpose.
I
J
Thank
you
very
much
one
question.
We
appreciate
that
the
skill
strategy
dress
skill
set
strategy
now
sits
with
make
it
York
and
it
actually
came
to
scrutiny
committee
just
last
week
and
we
heard
about
some
of
the
difficulties,
particularly
around
digital
skills,
which
are
identified
as
a
priority
area
and
one
example
given
was
the
very
large
drop-off
in
the
number
of
students
enrolling
in
IT
at
the
college
150
last
year.
J
30
this
year,
despite
the
identified
skills
gap
on
the
priority
for
the
city,
so
completely
recognize
that
the
the
sensibility
of
this
move,
but
just
hope
that
the
priority
will
not
fall
down
the
agenda
because
clearly
there
is
some
an
urgent
problem
there
and-
and
it
was
just
on
page
14-
it
lists
for
objects
from
the
objects,
the
first
three
of
which
very
expressly
state.
This
need
for
investment
in
opportunities
in
and
it's
a
phrase.
That's
used
repeatedly
technology
and
creative
business
option
D
your
object.
D
Okay,
thank
you.
Any
other
comments
or
questions.
No.
Are
members
happy,
then,
to
accept
the
recommendation
in
section
two
that
report
a
set
out
in
the
report?
Yes
good.
Thank
you
very
much.
Indeed,
let
us
move
on
their
agenda
item
7,
which
is
highways
funding
only
at
page,
17
and
Neil.
Your
floor
is
yours.
K
Thank
You
chair
and
this
report
is
outlining
the
detailed
breakdown
of
an
investment
of
4.4
million
pounds
into
the
city's
highway
infrastructure.
That
investment
is
both
for
highway
outcomes
and
economic
outcomes.
The
principal
sources
of
the
the
funding
now
I'm
not
going
to
detail
any
to
the
individual
programs,
I'm
sure
members.
K
If
you
wish
to
further
detail,
you
can
discuss
it
separately
outside
the
meeting,
rather
than
go
through
all
20
skins
but
happy
to
discuss
and
answer
any
questions
if
they
are
forthcoming
this
evening,
but
in
terms
of
the
specific
sources
of
funding,
I
got
six
hundred
and
seventy
six
thousand
pounds
from
the
Lendl
bridge
fund.
So
that's
effectively
the
money
that
has
been
retained
from
the
authority
from
from
the
Lendl
bridge
enforcement
activity.
You've
got
the
national
performance
improvement
fund,
which
is
DFT
money.
That
money
is
six
hundred
and
twenty
six
thousand.
K
That
money
has
been
given
to
the
authority
on
a
block
allocation
based
on
outcomes
looking
at
productivity,
congestion
and
economic
uplift
from
the
investment
we
have,
then
a
DFT
challenge,
for
you
have
a
targeted
highways
fund
within
the
authority's
budget
allocation.
That's
been
put
towards
a
DFT
challenge
from
a
DFT
challenge
fund
match
funding.
That's
the
next
item
below
the
nine
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
pounds.
There
is
a
Challenge
Fund
bid
and
that's
for
the
investment
that
Paul
Hepworth
referred
to
earlier
in
terms
of
the
route
65
in
route.
K
66,
National,
Cycle
work
network,
so
that
money
isn't
money
to
be
spent
or
allocated
tonight.
It's
effectively
to
inform
members
that,
should
we
be
successful
in
the
challenge
from
delving
920,000
allocated
to
that
route.
If
we
are
unsuccessful,
then
obviously
the
300,
the
200,000
that
is
identified
within
this
report
as
much
funding,
will
come
3/4
allocation
by
the
exec
remember
for
transport.
Then
we
move
on
from
the
DFT
challenge
fund
to
a
bachelor
project.
The
factory
project
again
is
a
allocation
by
Council
and
that's
effectively
to
look
at.
K
How
do
we
start
to
use
batteries
that
are
coming
surplus
from
particularly
buses
where
they
need
a
highly
efficient
battery
on
those
buses
for
them
to
operate?
They
can't
build
a
drop
below
80%
efficiency
so
once
they
do,
they
need
replacing
they
get.
That
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
effectively
have
Power
Cells
that
support
the
knee
the
grid
infrastructure
that
has
been
so
far
as
a
society
laid
out
for
the
provision
of
domestic
and
business
use.
It
hasn't
yet
hasn't
been
laid
out
for
the
provision
of
electricity
to
a
significant
domestic
and
commercial
fleet.
K
The
battery
project
is
intended
to
start
to
look
at.
How
might
we
look
at
energy
supply
across
the
network
and
cover
off
gaps
in
terms
of
the
infrastructure
that
we've
got
there?
It's
very
early
stage
and
I
think
it's
very,
very
cutting
edge
accommodation
on
this
Authority
that
is
effectively
at
that
cutting
edge
of
that
technology.
K
In
respect
of
the
next
items
there,
the
built
environment
fund,
that's
2.2
million
pounds
or
2.0
2
million
pounds
allocated
by
yourselves
out
of
council
capital
program
and
I'll
just
highlight
a
couple
of
items
in
there,
which
is
the
the
Fosgate
investment
which
is
proposed
at
half
a
million
pounds.
That
consultation
has
started
with
phosphate
businesses
in
residence,
because
that
also
includes
the
up
at
the
consideration
or
reversal
of
the
traffic
flow
for
for
Fosgate,
as
well
as
an
investment
in
the
actual
infrastructure
itself.
K
The
reversal
of
the
traffic
flow
intended
to
reduce
the
through
traffic
and
increase
the
sort
of
general
ambiance
of
the
Fosgate
area,
then
I'll
move
down
to
the
final
one
I
just
want
to
touch
upon,
which
is
the
city
center
outlined
business
case,
which
is
1.1
million.
The
1.1
million
in
tow
is
not
for
the
development
of
the
business
case,
alias
cell,
so
we
won't
be
spending
1.1
million
pounds
to
develop
in
a
business
case.
It's
the
concept
is
that
a
proportion
of
that
money
will
be
used
to
develop
a
business
case
for
the
holes.
K
Should
the
executive
choose
to
proceed
with
the
outlet
with
the
with
the
redevelopment
of
the
city
center,
I
will
also
highlight
that
the
same
concept
is
to
be
applied
to
tax
bein
a
come
from
street
and
have
to
be
high
street.
So
again
it's
a
it's
a
concept
and
Haxby
shopping
area
specifically
in
order
to
invest
in
those
areas
to
increase
economic
activity,
so
those
that
formed
is
present
predominantly
targeted
at
economic
uplift.
Okay,.
D
A
They,
like
the
road
markings,
you
know
renewing
the
yellow
box
junctions
in
the
white
lining,
which
hopefully
will
help
on
traffic
flow
and
going
on
back
onto
the
perhaps
me
and
Nathan,
two
totally
different
places,
and
that
this
is
necessarily
the
highway
as
such,
it
is
more
the
economic
development
of
the
yes
of
those
areas,
so
I
think
with
the
potholes
and
the
all
the
rest
of
it
goes
and
I
welcome
it.
Yes,.
M
Because
I
can
comment
that
I
think
this
report
needs
to
be
taken
in
the
context
of
our
whole
project.
We're
obviously
you've
seen
the
commitment
to
about
twenty
million
pounds
over
the
next
five
years
in
roads
and
highways,
and
so
in
this
sense
this
is
a
small
part
of
that
overall
commitment
into
some
of
those
schemes
that
council
gillies
was
just
talking
about
and
obviously
I
are
particularly
forward
to
seeing
the
results
of
that.
K
So
that
we're
a
very
initial
stages
in
respect
to
those
Pro
exercises
and
they
will
come
to
back
to
the
executive
member
for
the
transport,
the
detailed
approval
of
these
specific
schemes.
However,
I
would
reflect
that
we
are
the
third
highest
cycling
city
in
the
country
after
Cambridge
and
Oxford,
but
so
my
objective
is
to
raise
that
so
that
we
are
exceeding
Cambridge.
We
are
a
relatively
small
flat
city,
ideally
suited
for
cyclists.
I.
K
Think
the
investment
in
cycling
as
an
alternative
to
commuting
in
the
car
is
a
fantastic
investment
and
is
effectively
one
of
the
few
levers
that
we
can
put
apply
as
an
authority
to
deal
with
our
transport
and
air
quality
issues.
We're
not
going
to
be
building
new
and
dual
carriageways
new
highways
infrastructure.
Within
our
you
know,
beautiful
ancient
city
walls,
and
neither
are
we
in
the
position
to
effectively
ban
vehicles
from
the
city
centre
in
their
totality.
K
Because,
again,
you
know
the
economic
activity
that
that
brings
so
we
want
to
actually
encourage
behavioural
change
and
this
cycling
investment.
It
certainly
means
that
we've
got
the
infrastructure
in
place
to
encourage
that,
but
not
only
that
if
we
look
at
the
increase
in
the
access
fund
in
the
access
funding
complements
1.4
million
pounds
of
investment
by
the
DFT,
which
is
all
about
behavioral
change,
going
into
schools
going
into
businesses,
and
this
additional
contribution
that
you
should
you
choose
to
make
it
well,
it
ibly
grow
that
program
to
talk
to
our
residents
to
our
commuters.
K
N
N
When
I
appreciate
the
campaign
that
the
police
are
running
with
the
foreign
rescue
authority
to
get
motorists
to
provide
more
space
when
they
are
overtaking
cyclists,
and
therefore
that
small
amount
of
spaces
is
critical
and
the
infrastructure
includes
cycled
parking
in
the
city
centre,
which
has
suffered
in
recent
years.
I
think
that
the
investment
in
economic
generation
and
the
potential
investment
in
Aitkin
there's
a
lot
of
in
interest
in
city
center
large
schemes.
But
I
think
we
need
to
ensure
that
there's
a
balance.
N
I
think
residents
expect
that,
and
it
in
many
ways
responds
to
the
petition
that
councillor
hunter
who's
sitting
at
the
back,
who
runs
a
business
in
areum.
It
sure
it
responds
to
the
wishes
of
residents
to
see
a
public
realm
that
is
attractive
to
people
coming
and
setting
up
businesses
there.
There
is
a
reference
in
the
next
item
to
business
rates.
N
I
think
that's
something
that
we
as
an
authority
have
to
address
more
because,
as
the
government
grant
disappears,
we
are
even
more
dependent
upon
there
being
a
flourishing
business
rate
income
to
ensure
that
we
are
able
to
provide
basic
services.
I
welcome
the
battery
project
that
have
been
pushing
for
some
time.
The
utilization
of
improvement
in
battery
technology
to
ensure
the
greater
use
of
renewable
power
and
clean
energy
is
something
that
will
save
this
Authority
money
in
time
and
I.
N
O
Thank
You
chair,
yes,
I,
have
a
brief
comments
and
then
a
few
questions
on
this
I
do
think.
There
is
quite
a
lot
to
welcome
in
all
of
this
there's
some
very
interesting
projects
and
some
projects
were
writing
for
a
long
time
at
last,
coming
forward
at
the
risk
of
putting
too
much
emphasis
on
one
small
thing.
I
do
think
the
battery
projects
is
is
a
good
idea,
not
just
because
of
what
it's
doing,
but
because
of
the
way
you're
doing
it.
By
taking
the
initiative
to
work
with
researchers,
its
intensity.
B
O
I
think
that's
something
as
a
council,
we
should
look
at
doing
more
in
other
areas
where
we
need
to
develop
a
way
forward
and
take
a
lead,
so
I
do
think.
That's
a
good
thing.
I'm
also
pleased
to
see
that,
under
the
recommendations
for
the
whole
thing,
it
says
that
the
reason
for
a
lot
of
this
is
the
need
to
implement.
O
The
council's
transport
policy
is
identified
in
the
third
local
transport
plan
and
I
just
hope
that
you
do
intend
to
move
on
after
this
to
implement
other
parts
of
the
3rd
local
transport
plan
and
to
develop
it
further
and
to
implement
our
low
emissions
strategy.
Make
progress
with
the
transshipment
Depot,
despite
the
difficulties
that
we're
told
about,
so
we
can
keep
heavy
vehicles
out
of
the
center
do
more
to
improve
bus
services.
O
You
know
there's
things
in
here,
but
not
really
this
improve
evening
or
weekend
services
that
much
so
I
think.
There's
this
more
to
be
done.
On
that
my
specific
questions
one
was
about
Fosgate.
It
was
simply
to
ask
you
the
consultations
going
on
at
the
moment.
Doors
perhaps
just
finished
I
think,
but
the
consultation
doesn't
make
any
reference
to
the
highway
works
with
the
500-thousand
and
which
seemed
a
little
bit
of
a
surprise
when
it
came
out
and
how
do
you
see
those
two
parts
of
the
project
fitting
together?
O
K
K
The
consultation
come
back
with
positive
response
from
businesses
that
they
would
like
to
see
that,
because
of
the
the
flow
of
the
traffic,
the
quantum
of
the
traffic
will
will
influence
what
we
ultimately
end
up
putting
down
on
Fosgate
in
terms
of
that
investment.
So
there
is
an
absolute
there
is
a
relationship,
and
it
is
sequential,
so
obviously
started
the
consultation,
because
there
we
want
to
get
on
with
it
as
much
as
anything
else.
K
O
Thank
you,
I
think
it
might
be
a
bit
chicken-and-egg,
because
if
people
can
see
what
can
be
done
physically,
it
might,
you
know,
be
relevant
for
people
to
know
that
when
they're
responding
to
the
consultation
and
the
second,
my
second
question
was
about
buses
and
the
smart
ticketing.
It
was
just
really
to
say
that
I
think
we
still
have
quite
a
long
way
to
go
on
the
smart,
ticketing.
I,
don't
think
we're
there.
Yet
you
know
as
a
bus,
frequent
bus
user.
O
What
I
need
to
be
able
to
do
is
to
buy
10
bus
journeys
for
the
price
of
8
and
use
them
on
any
bus
anytime
for
any
period
of
time
like
an
oyster
card
or
the
our
karne
system.
But
we
don't
really
have
that.
Yet
do
we
and
are
we?
Are
we
still
going
to
move
towards
that
to
really
encourage
people
to
use
buses
who
don't
use
them
at
the
moment?.
P
We've
still
got
a
long
way
to
go,
and
we
continue
to
work
on
that
and
that's
why,
in
many
respects,
I'm
really
pleased
that
contactless
ticketing,
that's
using
your
bank
card
to
be
able
to
board
the
bus
and
pay
with
your
bank
card
will
be
will
be
coming
on
the
stream
on
York's
buses
over
the
next
12
to
18
months.
You
see.
O
I
did
liquid
this
up
on
the
I
travel
website
before
I
came
out
and
to
me
it's
very
confusing
and
I
was
trying
hard
to
understand
what's
available,
how
you
get
it
and
I
still
couldn't
see
that
I
could
buy
something
that
I
could
use.
I
could
keep
in
my
purse
for
four
five
six
seven
weeks
that
I
could
use
one
day
but
not
another
day
and
would
still
save
me
money.
Okay,.
O
O
Yeah
I'm
sure
and-
and
you
have
kind
of
answered
my
last
question
when
you
talked
about
the
1.1
million,
because
it
did
kind
of
read
that
that
was
for
the
business
case,
so
I
think
that's
very
interesting
money,
that's
coming
forward.
I.
Think
people
would
probably
like
to
see
more
of
a
rationale
for
how
you
know,
what's
behind
all
that
and
that
it's
not
going
to
duplicate
things,
that
we
would
those
have
already
been
underway
in
the
city
center.
C
Thank
you,
chair,
chair,
our
just
briefly
some
comments.
If
I
may
I
think
it's
so
welcoming
to
get
a
report
that
pulls
together
all
the
different
funds
and
all
the
amounts
of
money
and
actually
give
some
direction
in
how
we're
going
to
spend
it,
I
actually
think
there's
very
little
value
with
this
meeting
in
drilling
down
to
the
individual
items
since
they're
going
to
go
to
the
executive
members
decision
and
everybody
can
register
to
speak
and
have
an
input
at
that
point.
C
As
the
process
is
developed
and
maybe
that's
a
more
appropriate
place
for
that
level
of
scrutiny
in
questions
to
be
asked
and
clearly
we
could
all
come
up
with
a
different
list
of
wonts
or
ass
in
here,
but
it's
really
nice
to
see
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
everything
I
see
in
front
of
me
is
focused
on
congestion,
pollution
or
economic
development.
I'd
like
to
thank
offices
for
bringing
that
focus
towards
committee.
Thank
you.
Obviously,
I
support
it.
Thank.
D
J
J
Nevertheless,
it's
that
there's
five
percent
of
this
overall
built
environment
fund
proposed
allocated
to
specific
non
city
center
investments,
and
you
know
I,
would
question
whether
perhaps
more
could
be
done
to
try
and
strike
a
more
effective
balance,
and
my
question
if
I
may
was
about
the
fiber
reinstatement
funding
and
just
whether
or
not
this
is
50k
that
we
are
investing,
because
the
easiest
thing
to
do
is
for
us
to
fix
the
errors
of
contractors
or
infrastructure
owners,
which
section
is
that
I
beg
your
pardon
page
21.
It's
the
productivity,
investment
funding
and
I.
J
K
Can
reassure
lenders
that
effectively,
we
know
picking
up
the
obligations
of
statutory
Undertaker's.
It
is
effectively
a
deficiency
in
the
regulatory
regime
that
statutory
under
the
Undertaker's
only
have
to
replace
what
they
take
up
and
also,
to
the
extent
that
we
have
an
aging
highway
infrastructure
where
they
undertake
a
repair
undertake
to
put
a
channel
within
a
through,
say
an
aged
footpath,
for
example,
and
that
causes
the
broader
footpath
to
start
to
fail
more
rapidly.
They
are
only
obliged
effectively
to
reinstate
the
trench
that
they've
dug.
K
K
So
it
ensures
that
when
the
contractors
are
reinstating,
for
example,
pavers
we
provide
them
with
new
brand-new
pavers
to
relay
so
we
don't
have
the
cost
of
laying
those
pavers,
but
for
the
resident
they
end
up
with
a
street
with
no
broken
panes
on
it,
whereas
if
we
just
left
it
to
the
the
regulatory
regime,
though
they
would
have
had
to
do,
was
reinstate
the
broken
pavers
to
a
satisfactory
standard.
So
I
think
that's
wrong
and
reflects
it.
But
I
don't
underestimate
the
issues
that
are
thrown
up
within
communities
by
a
statutory
Undertaker's
coming
in.
D
D
Good,
thank
you.
I
think
that
wraps
up
the
debate
on,
though
it's
been
a
comprehensive
run
through
that
report.
It's
a
very
good
report,
if
I
may
say
so,
Neil
and
our
members
happy
to
having
accepted
the
report
to
delegate
the
detail
of
implementation
to
the
executive
member
transport
and
to
the
director
of
economy
and
plays
and
unhappy
Aadhaar.
Okay,.
K
Yeah
sorry
chair
just
to
be
clear,
exactly
I,
think
the
recommendations
throughout
the
report.
You
end
up
with
a
number
of
executive
members,
so
the
battery
project,
for
example,
is
delegated
to
the
council.
Waller.
The
economic
regeneration
is
to
councillor
and
gasping.
So
it's
a
variety
of
members
site.
You.
D
Are
you're
absolutely
right,
for
example,
there's
director
that
the
executive
or
economic
development
in
regard
to
Haxby
and
an
a
come?
Yes,
yes,
I'll,
correct
myself!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that.
Okay!
Moving
on
then
item.
The
next
item
is
item
8,
which
is
to
do
with
a
discretionary
rate
relief
policy,
and
that's
at
page
31,
DNA,
youth
to
the
DA,
okay,
Pauline
and
David
over
to
you.
Okay,.
Q
Q
We
need
an
approved
scheme
which
is
attached
to
annex
a
and
you
can
see
the
criteria
which
is
set
down
in
paragraphs
seven
and
eight
sorry,
eight
and
nine,
a
agenda
page
34,
which
are
a
fairly
simplistic
to
apply
in
respect
of
the
Enterprise
Zone,
the
new
policy
at
annex
B
for
business
rate
relief.
The
applies
a
relief
for
five
years
from
the
first
of
April
this
year,
when
the
enterprise
zone
was
set
up
to
provide
up
to
100
percent
relief
for
businesses
moving
into
the
area.
Q
The
scheme
it
scheme
criteria
is
much
more
detailed,
as
you
can
see
at
paragraph
7
at
annex
B,
and
the
purpose
of
that
scheme
in
particular,
is
to
attract
new
and
growing
businesses
into
the
enterprise
loan,
and
the
benefits
for
the
council
is
that
it
retains
100%
of
the
business
rates.
Growth
from
the
end
of
March
of
the
1st
of
april
should
I,
say
baseline
levels
for
a
25
year
period
and
is
compensated
by
central
government
for
any
business
rate
relief
granted.
Q
The
information
in
front
of
you,
if
you
turn
to
agenda
page
45
at
the
bottom,
there
is
a
clear
paragraph
there
around
decision
making
in
relation
to
the
first
policy,
we
wish
to
apply
the
same
decision-making
process
to
the
second
policy
as
well.
They'll
follow
the
same
process
but
I'm
sorry
that
paragraph
was
missing
in
the
second
policy,
so
that
will
mean
that
all
decisions
will
be
made
by
the
director
of
customer
and
corporate
services
in
consultation
with
the
executive
member.
Q
Those
decisions
will
be
published
monthly
and
summarized
in
a
quarterly
report
in
public
at
the
executive
members
decision
session,
we're
suggesting
monthly,
because
if
we
published
all
the
time
because
we're
anticipating
in
the
first
few
weeks
and
months,
we'll
get
quite
a
lot
of
these
applications.
So
we
don't
want
to
hold
the
process
up
for
publication
of
decisions.
M
M
But
I
suspect
they
know
who
to
talk
to
or
who
to
lobby,
but
in
particular
paragraph
10,
and
obviously
it
shows
us
how
quickly
the
funding,
the
discretionary
funding
that
that's
been
given
by
the
government
tapers
that
tapers
down
and
do
we
have
any
any
sense
as
to
how
we're
going
to
manage
that
situation
year-on-year
with
businesses
and
those
businesses
who
obviously
will
continue
to
be
affected.
Or
is
that
the
guidance
that
we're
waiting
for
from
from
the
government.
L
L
So
while
some
businesses
interested
in
claiming
the
discretionary
ray
relief
was
acknowledgement
in
the
consultation
that
the
government
did
with
us
that
they
might
be
a
request
by
authorities
carry
forward
some
of
the
initial
first
year
spend
into
second
and
third
years,
because
you
may
not
spend
it
all
in
the
first
year,
which
would
kind
of
manage
some
of
that.
Equally,
the
other
bit
in
the
consultation
was
the
government
expects
that
you,
any
business,
will
be
in
a
position
by
year.
Four
to
meet
its
new
business
rate,
demands
the
the
funding.
L
Wasn't
there
specifically
to
support
for
a
business
if
it
was
failing?
It
was
a
small
business
that
was
going
to
grow
and
able
to
meet
the
radom
and
in
future
years,
so
they
tapered
it
in
that
way.
We're
still
waiting
for
clarification
as
to
whether
we
can
carry
forward
any
of
that
funding,
but
hopefully
we
will
be
able
to
for
don't
spend
it,
so
it
would
increase
the
money
available
in
future
years.
If
that
was
the
case,.
C
You
chair
chair,
just
to
echo
a
couple
of
points
and
thank
offices
for
being
in
this
report
forward
so
speedily.
There
are
businesses
out
there
who
who
are
likely
to
struggle
as
a
result
of
Lee
of
the
the
new
rating
structure
and
the
funding.
That's
now
coming
through
I
think
it's
important
that
we
address
that
we've
does
small
businesses,
particularly
as
soon
as
possible.
So
the
first
half
of
the
report
I
fully
fully
fully
support
I.
R
R
R
C
Thank
you,
I
think
that
was
very
articulate
and
to
actually
explains
why
that
boundary
is
put
together,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
The
only
other
comment
then
I
would
make.
Finally
is
whilst
and
pleased
to
see
the
first
annex
and
the
vit
support
come
forward
so
quickly.
This
one
has
come
forward.
A
little
slower
than
I
would
hoped.
We've
got
an
implementation
date
for
the
five-year
actually
from
the
1st
of
April
and
we're
already
past
that
mark.
O
Future
I
just
have
a
question
and
then
a
comment
questions
rather
a
simple
one
in
what's
probably
quite
complicated
situation
really,
but
on
the
enterprise
zone.
Am
I
right
in
reading
that
the
smallest
businesses
will
get
up
to
100%
rate
relief
and
the
largest
businesses
will
only
get
around
four
to
five
percent
and
they'll
be
a
gradations
in
between?
Is
that?
Is
that
a
correct
reading
of
the
paper
I've
I
made
it
too
simple,
have.
Q
I
R
O
O
The
effective
outcome,
because
of
other
things,
okay,
that
sounds
so
I-
don't
have
any
problem
with
them.
You
know
the
schemes
here,
I
did
just
chair
want
to
reiterate
the
concerns
we've
heard
about
the
the
other
scheme,
the
discussion,
discretionary
business
rate
scheme
just
to
underline
that
it
is
a
concern.
O
This
money
is
mainly
for
the
first
year
if
it
can
perhaps
be
carried
forward
a
bit,
but
it
is
going
to
run
out
and
it
businesses
are
still
going
to
suffer
from
from
some
businesses
because
for
some
of
them
are
very,
very
big
increase
in
their
business
rates
and
they're,
not
necessarily
going
to
be
able
to
grow,
as
you
said
sufficiently
to
meet
that
you
know
to
bridge
that
gap.
So
I
think
we
do
have
to
keep
in
mind
if
there's
anything
else
that
we
can
do
as
a
council
about
that.
Yes,.
L
Want
to
is
yet
I
was
just
going
to
comment
on
that.
One
of
the
issues
around
business
rates
is
only
one
time
something
around
80%
of
our
liabilities
in
appeal.
So
all
the
business
is
affected
by
this
increase
have
the
ability
to
appeal,
so
things
have
been
rated
wrongly
and
incorrectly,
then
they
can
appeal
against
that
so
Wells
with
mei-fun
businesses.
If
the
calculation
of
the
business
rates
is
incorrect,
they
will
get
a
refund
so
because
that
would
feed
to
hopefully
within
12
months
of
the
appeal
process.
L
L
Appeal
evaluation
because
evaluations
based
on
the
rental
charges,
it's
based
on
the
turnover
etc.
So
in
some
cases
the
highest
increase,
rateable
value
in
the
city
was
a
well-known
national,
international
coffee,
company
and
theirs
has
been
wrong
for
some
time.
So
I
don't
think
that'd
be
coming
to
us
on
this
day.
I'd
was
nice
for
hardship,
but
there
are
others
that
maybes
incorrect,
so
it
swings
around
about
so
overall
the
liability
didn't
increase
not
nationally,
but
it's
how
it's
been
distributed
across
the
businesses.
D
Yeah
I
mean
revaluations
tend
to
reflect.
What's
going
on
in
the
market,
some
areas
go
up.
Some
areas
go
down,
I
think
the
recent
revaluation
has
thrown
up
winners
and
losers.
All
those
you
say,
some
national
companies,
it
probably
balances
out
actually
and
obviously
the
transitional
relief
arrangements
are
designed
to
take
some
of
the
sting
out
of
those
particular
increases.
This
is
a
very
complex
paper
and
I
think
you've
done
very
well
actually
in
pulling
it
all
together.
I
thought
we
probably
need
a
PhD
in
mathematics
to
understand
it.
J
You
are
someone
just
getting
really
briefing
and
it
was
a
question
page
34
references.
The
fact
that
the
government
has
given
a
steer
on
the
criteria
for
the
the
drr
and
it
talks
about
the
200
KRV
and
the
percentage
increase
of
12.5
percent,
and
it
just
struck
me
that
maybe
if
there
was
any
discretion,
if
it's
a
steer
as
opposed
to
a
something
hard
and
fast
but
I
wonder
whether
we
could
have
a
sliding
scale.
J
Perhaps
because
you
could
have
two
businesses
in
the
same
street,
one
of
which
has
an
RV
of
200
in
10k
and
an
increase
of
30%.
The
other
has
meets
the
criteria,
one
nine,
nine
and
twelve
and
a
half
percent.
Now
one
would
benefit
from
the
drr,
the
other
would
and
I.
Just
wonder
whether
we
might
be
able
to
put
some
parameters
on
a
sliding
scale
in
there
or
guess
by
the
smile.
This
has
been
considered
and
isn't
possible.
L
Think
what
we
need
to
be
clear
with
is
quite
quickly
the
government's
a
role
scheme
out
what
I
have
to
point
out.
It's
a
discretionary
scheme.
You
can't
fit
your
judgment,
so
these
are
general
guidelines.
You
have
to
judge
each
case
on
its
own
merits
coming
forward.
So
whichever
business
comes
forward,
you
have
to
consider
it.
We
use
those
guidelines
because
you
know
clearly
you've
got
to
have
a
substantial
increase
and
clearly,
if
you've
got
over
2,000
rateable
value
might
be
a
big
multinational
company.
L
N
To
yeah
Thank
You
chair
just
a
brief
point,
I
think
it
does
still
leave
us
with
a
fundamental
issue
that
the
total
take
from
high
street.
Businesses
is
the
same
as
it
was
before:
internet
shopping
and
the
out-of-town
shopping,
and
it
does.
It
still
got
that
impact
on
me
on
the
range
of
shops
in
High
Street,
which
have
been
under
under
Parrish
for
some
time.
N
I
just
wanted
to
raise
a
specific
point
that,
whilst
most
valuations
they
bump
along
you
could
compare
at
one
year
on
the
next
missile
is
changed
slightly
playing
fields
playing
fields
have
in
Flook
increased
by
50%,
which
seems
an
incredible
jump
for
what
are
relatively
small
businesses
that
around
the
city.
It
seems
a
rather
steep
jump
for
them
to
absorb
within
their
business
planet.
In
the
overall
fact
factors,
it's
probably
not
a
huge
amount,
but
for
a
Sports
Club
operating
on
the
margins,
it's
going
to
make
a
significant
difference.
L
The
answer
is
no
not
in
specific
detail
valuation
office
agency
set
the
criteria
for
calculating
the
writable
value,
so
they've
increased
the
rate
of
value.
Hence
the
the
rates
have
gone
up.
There's
a
rationale
around
how
they
do
all
that
I
couldn't
explain
how
to
do
with
playing
fields,
but
you
know
clearly,
if
we
think
it's
wrong
or
the
the
sports
associate
think
is
wrong.
They
can
appeal
their
rateable
value
if
they
think
it's.
If
the
appeal
fails,
we
can't
influence
because
it's
a
government
dependent
we
can
influence
how
they're
there
our
works
just.
N
D
The
answer
to
that
will
prolong
the
method,
evaluation
and
clearly
we're
not
privy
to
that.
Yes,
indeed,
indeed,
okay.
Does
that
conclude
the
debate
on
this,
then?
Are
members
happy,
then,
to
accept
the
recommendations
in
Section
two
of
that
report
which
effectively
delegates
the
various
decisions
to
me
and
to
the
director
of
customer
and
corporate
services?
Yes,
we
agreed
thank
you
very
much
indeed,
the
next
and
Thank
You,
Pauline
and
David.
The
next
item
is
shared
ownership,
affordable
housing
program,
Tom,
Cole,.
S
The
the
the
approach
that
we're
taking
here
clearly
supports
the
wider
aspirations
that
were
approved
in
March
around
the
partnership
with
the
HCA
and
our
program
to
accelerate
delivery
of
homes
in
the
city.
At
the
time
of
the
application,
95%
of
the
the
national
funding
that
was
available
was
prioritized
around
homeownership.
Clearly
that
landscape
has
now
changed
and
may
change
further
after
the
election
Paul's
going
to
the
some
detail
about
what
shared
ownership
is
about,
which
I
think
it's
fairly
self-explanatory,
but
Paul
is
going
to
say
a
bit
about
what
the
two
offers
are.
T
Thank
you,
Tom
Thank,
You,
chair,
really,
to
reiterate,
I,
think
what
Thomas
said
when
we
pitched
for
this
scheme
of
the
Homes
and
Communities
agency,
we
thought
to
elements
of
the
program
would
be
worthwhile.
One
for
20
and
I
will
come
on
to
the
flexibility
around
the
program
late
in
it
in
a
little
bit
one
for
twenty
five
homes,
essentially
customer
led
purchased,
probably
from
the
second-hand
market
where
the
customer
can
choose
a
home.
T
There
will
be
a
framework
and
parameters
around
that
clearly,
which
we
will
be
working
up
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
but
within
that
there
could
be
new,
build
homes
included
as
well,
and
particularly
flats
I
would
probably
suggest
in
terms
of
a
price
range,
but
that
part
of
the
program
very
much
focus
on
that
customer
having
choice
about
where
they
buy
and
what
they
buy
within,
as
I
say,
a
framework
and
then
the
second
element
was
for
40
homes.
Both
of
these
scheme
programs
by
the
way
have
the
same
ground
raised.
T
There's
no
difference,
it's
purely
about
that.
Just
the
focus
of
the
delivery
would
be
40
homes
which,
essentially
initially
at
least
we
saw
as
a
providing
a
top-up
to
the
affordable
housing
provision
on
larger
new
build
developments
that
have
a
requirement
to
provide
affordable
housing
and
particularly
on
those
developments,
the
poor
viability
reasons
because
of
high
costs
or
remediation
or
whatever,
whatever
will
not
meet
that
affordable
housing
target
and
therefore,
by
putting
buying
new
homes
at
what
would
be
market
value.
Essentially.
T
But
using
this
funding
we'd
be
able
to
push
up
that
affordable
housing
provision
closer
to
the
to
perhaps
the
target
that
isn't
the
only
route
through
new
build
homes.
It
could
also
be
that
they
are
indeed
meeting
the
target
for
planning
gain
or
their
or
their
new
building
schemes
that
don't
have
a
requirement
for
affordable
housing,
but
the
scheme
could
still
deliver
homes
on
that
on
those
sites
and
I.
Think
and
I
hope
that,
from
what
I've
just
said,
one
of
the
messages
coming
across
really
and
I
think
is
really
important.
T
Is
that
yes,
there's
two
broad
elements
and
to
this
program,
but
there's
an
awful
lot
of
flexibility
between
them.
I
think
it's
really
key.
This
is
clearly
a
new
thing
for
the
local
authority
to
be
doing
and
I
think
what
we
do
need,
and
we
will
be
following
keenly-
is
a
sort
of
flexibility
between
those
two
programs
over
the
over
the
course
of
the
of
this
scheme,
which
is
pretty
much
going
to
be
I
would
say,
guided
by
popularity
with
customers.
T
I
U
Thank
you,
Joe,
just
a
few
brief
comments.
If
I
may,
first
I'd
like
to
thank
Tom
and
Paula
team,
obviously
for
putting
this
this
paper
together,
this
is
clearly
a
brilliant
result
for
low-income
households
who
would
love
to
own
their
own
home
and
obviously
haven't
been
able
to,
or
on
the
open
market.
I
think.
What's
so
good
about
the
report
is,
if
you
look
at
the
annexes,
you
can
see
how
the
open
market
offer
stacked
up
versus
the
shared
ownership
off
and
I.
U
Think
that
really
demonstrates
how
valuable
this
will
be
to
low
income
households
now
clearly
homeownership
is.
It
is
only
achievable
if
you're
able
to
actually
raise
that
deposit
and
that's
always
the
difficult
thing:
it's
not
actually
the
the
monthly
repayments
a
lot
of
the
time
and
also
I
can
speak
from
personal
experience,
actually
in
saving
for
a
deposit
and
trying
to
get
on
the
housing
ladder.
And,
what's
so
good
about
about
this
scheme,
for
me,
is
that,
after
that,
initial
purchase
is
made
of.
U
Obviously,
the
customer
and
the
owner
of
that
property
can
then
what's
called
staircase
and
buy
additional
chunks
of
equity
in
that
house
own
more
of
that
of
that
property,
but
during
in
that
process,
they'll
obviously
be
paying
a
rent
to
the
council
who
own
part
of
that
property.
They're
therefore
generates
a
revenue
stream
for
the
council,
but
in
addition
to
that,
when
they
do
purchase
those
equity
chunks,
then
the
council
receives
a
capital
receipt
which
can
then
be
reinvested
into
affordable
housing
in
future.
U
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
touch
on
the
prioritization
and
eligibility
points
made
in
the
obviously.
A
lot
of
these
are
set
nationally.
We're
not
actually
allowed
to
amend
them
as
a
local
authority,
but
what
we
can
do
is
market
this
offer
to
certain
areas
of
the
job
market
effectively
and
what
we've
said
that
we
will
do
in
this
paper,
which
I
think
should
be
absolutely
welcomed
and
fits
in
with
the
previous
report,
which,
which
Tom
mentioned
from
back
in
March.
U
Is
that
we'll
be
able
to
to
market
this
in
key
local
recruitment
areas
where
there
are
challenging
market
conditions
are
actually
getting
on
the
housing
market?
So
we're
talking
specifically
about
NHS
workers,
social
care
and
children's
services,
staff
and
teachers,
so
people
that
really
matter
to
the
local
economy,
but
sometimes
can
struggle
when
we
have
affordability,
affordability,
issues
in
areas
like
York,
so
in
some
very,
very
supportive
of
this
and
delighted
to
support
the
recommendation
on
page
56.
I
think
it
shows
this
administration's
commitment
to
affordable
housing
and
encouraging
homeownership
and
I
would
also
say.
U
D
J
Sit
so
so
clinic
where
it's
due
this
is,
you
know
sixty
five
or
forty
rather
new
homes
and
twenty
five
shared
ownership
opportunities.
In
addition,
and
notwithstanding
what
councilor
Lyle
has
said
about
marketing
to
do,
NHS
and
other
key
workers,
which
is,
is
positive
and
I
appreciate
it
as
much
as
we
can
realistically
do.
Nevertheless,
I
do
think.
That's
you
know.
Obviously
one
of
the
weaknesses
with
the
scheme
is
that
lack
of
ability
to
locally
determine
priorities.
J
Welcome
the
Armed
Forces
commitment.
As
someone
who's,
you
know
parents
both
served,
but
nevertheless
you
know
there
are
other
key
workers
here
who,
given
that
the
number
of
units
against
the
identified
need
of
115
units
per
year
of
this
tenure
type
compared
to
the
65
that
will
be
delivered
over.
So
in
a
bit
years,
there's
clearly
going
to
be
a
gap
and
how
how
able
this
scheme
is
to
serve
those
key
workers
and
clear
and
desperate
need
in
York
remains
very
much
in
question,
and
so
just
one
question.
J
The
exact
member,
if
I'm
Matty
on
that
and
barley
is
happy
to
sleep
with
you
in
another
from,
but
you
did
recently
say
at
the
council
that
you
would
be
looking
at
options
for
a
dev
code
which
might
be
able
to
then
set
some
of
these
some
priorities
more
locally.
Is
that
something
that
has
taken
a
backseat
as
a
result
of
this?
Is
it
still
being
considered
by
officers
and
options
being
prepared?
You
just
figure
to
know
where
we
are
with
that
yeah.
U
Absolutely
still
big
work,
so
I
think
we're
looking
at
I.
Think
I
mentioned
a
full
council.
Some
I
think
probably
looking
around
September
now
I
think.
If
that's,
if
that's
right
but
obvious,
it
works
so
I'm
going
on
that
it's
a
very
big
project
and
a
lot
of
resources
are
going
into
it.
But
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
emphasize
with
this
is
that
we've
talked
about
the
partnership
that
we've
established
with
the
Homes
and
Communities
agency.
This
sits
outside
of
that,
but
obviously
is
is
works
in
tandem
with.
O
Thank
you,
yes,
I
just
had
I,
suppose
a
question
really
obviously
any
affordable
housing
is
very
welcome
and
this
this
schemes
are
welcome,
but
what
affordable
means
is
is
that
you
know
means
different
things
to
different
people.
Doesn't
it
and
I
just
wondered
if
you
could
clarify
who
who
will
be
able
to
afford
these
houses
and
I
may
I
may
not
have
understood
in
councilor
Lyle
referred
to
the
deposit,
but
just
the
purchase.
U
You
I'm
happy
to
start
start
off
with
an
answer
on
that.
If
you
actually
look
at
the
annexes
that
I
mentioned
Alex
one
and
annex
especially
annex
two
of
the
backing
details,
exactly
what
the
monthly
costs
are,
the
minimum
household
incomes
for
both
in
a
comparative
level
of
shared
ownership
versus
open
market,
but
actually
on
page
seventy
four.
You
can
see
approximate
monthly
in
monthly
housing
costs,
as
well
as
the
deposit
levels
that
are
actually
required
to
raise
so
effectively.
U
What
you've
got
is
the
the
buyer
will
purchase
between
25
and
75
percent
of
the
cost
of
the
house.
Then
the
sister
of
your
council,
in
partnership
with
the
Homes
and
Communities
agency,
will
pay
for
the
rest
of
it,
receive
a
below
market
rent
from
the
customer
for
that,
and
then
that
obviously
significantly
reduces
the
deposit
amount
that
that
customer
needs
to
get
because
they'll
be
getting
a
mortgage
on
between
25
and
75
percent
of
the
cost
of
that
property.
If
that
helps.
D
D
Clearly,
this
will
be
dwarfed
by
the
greater
Homes
and
Communities
agency
joint
venture,
but
this
initiative
doesn't
able
an
early
start
to
be
made
and
I
think
that's
all
important.
Any
initiative
that
can
come
up
with
a
open
up
home
ownership
to
more
people,
particularly
younger
people
and
to
key
workers,
has
to
be
welcomed
and
I.
Think
members
will
join
with
me
in
accepting
the
recommendation
at
section.
7
of
this
report
am
I
correct.
D
K
D
May
I
interrupt
you
there
I
just
realized
that
this
is
the
report.
That's
got.
The
pink
pages
on
can
I
just
remind
all
members
that
the
information
in
that
annex
in
that
pink
page
annex
is
confidentially
commercially
confidential.
So
if
anyone
feels
a
need
to
discuss
that
detail,
will
you
please
tell
me
now
and
I
can
ask
the
press
and
the
public
to
to
leave?
If
you
don't
want
to
discuss
it,
if
you're
happy
to
accept
it
at
face
value,
then
fine,
the
press
and
public
can
stay.
C
K
I
would
just
also
to
replay
back
to
members,
because
some
of
the
comments
that
were
made
during
the
public
speaking
session,
the
air
quality
strategy
makes
recommendations
in
respect
of
the
transition
to
you
lead
it
does
the
ultra
low
emission
vehicles
in
respect
to
the
park
and
right
there
isn't
a
decision
of
the
authority
that
committed
to
introducing
those
those
vehicles.
So
this
report
doesn't
contradict
any
previous
decision
of
the
authority.
Thank
you
to
Andy
for
detail.
Thanks.
P
The
service
will
deliver
a
step
change
in
city's
air
quality,
with
the
same
high
frequency
and
quality
of
service,
which
York's,
Park
and
Ride
users
have
come
to
expect
the
summary
of
the
key
features
of
the
winning
suppliers.
Proposals
can
be
found
at
Table
three
of
the
report,
in
addition
to
the
key
features
and
the
core
requirements
that
were
set
out
in
specification
of
the
invitation
to
tender.
P
Ie
on
days
when
we
have
specific
events
in
the
city
where
we
have
found
on
occasion,
the
Park
and
Ride
has
finished
before
the
event
has
cleared
out
in
respect
of
those
items,
the
executive
is
recommended
to
approve
option
a
which
includes
the
overnight
parking
and
enhanced
Sunday
operating
hours
on
a
maximum
of
five
days
per
annum.
Thank
You
chair
thank.
A
Think,
as
Andrew
said,
it's
been
a
long,
I'll
say:
turgid
journey
this,
particularly
after
thee
after
the
first
procurement
exercise
and
I
think
it's
showing
what
we
can
do.
Everything
is
not
bound
up
in
the
beginning
and
hopefully
we'll
get
better
over
the
over
the
term
of
this
whole
contract
with
electric
and
low
emission
vehicles
and
as
you
were
there
last
night
chair,
we
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
the
minister
to
transport
and
who
is
very
supportive
of
both
the
park-and-ride
and
what
our
what
our
conditions
were.
N
This
came
out
of
the
very
recent
publication
from
government,
including
air
quality
and
the
even
larger
scientific
appendix
this
does
discuss
the
information
which
was
required
from
the
client
earth
case
and
earlier
this
year,
I
was
able
to
at
a
conference
of
speaking
at
and
they
were
to
thank
Anna
s,
lob
and
and
really
for
the
work
that
they
had
done
in
pushing
the
case
for
ensuring
that
the
government
responded
to
this
very
serious
health
issue.
The
technology
exists,
it's
a
matter
of
getting
it
on
the
street.
N
So
the
the
government
report
which
came
out
after
you
will
have
written
this
report,
so
it
could
have
been
included,
but
that
does
relate
to
the
additional
funding
on
page
86,
talking
about
the
the
air
quality
of
procurement
and
then
additional
funding,
100
million
from
the
2016
Autumn
Statement
the
government,
yet
to
announce
how
the
funding
will
be
distributed,
and
therefore
there
does
need
to
be
the
flexible
to
push
for
as
much
as
possible
an
electric
fleet
as
the
executive
member
responsible
for
air
quality.
Of
course,
I
would
push
for
that.
N
But
if
it's
in
your
bus,
it's
quite
an
expensive
thing
to
go
wrong
and
it
would
have
been
a
good
thing
for
a
green
investment
bank
to
take
on
that
global
risk,
absorbing
aspect
so
that
operators
didn't
feel
that
they
were
taking
a
bit
of
a
risk.
Now
the
the
issue
of
euro-6
we've
got
to
see
what
that
will
deliver
towards
the
end
of
its
lifespan
if
it
continues
to
be
clean
than
that,
that's
brilliant,
but
if
there
are
technology,
changes
that
need
to
be
implemented
to
maintain
that
and
I
think
it
was
very
interesting.
N
We
shall
have
to
wait
and
see,
but
I
think
it's
an
important
aspect
that
we
ultimately
want
to
improve
the
air
quality
in
the
city
and
on
page
182
of
the
technical
appendix
it
spells
out
the
commitments
to
the
legally
binding
commitments
to
reducing
nitrogen
by
of
production
nationally
in
2020
in
2030,
which
inevitably
means
much
more
application
of
technology
and
I
would
want
to
see
that
included
in
the
procurement
of
any
vehicles
that
stick
around
a
long
time
on
our
streets.
Therefore,
I
would
urge
that
this.
N
D
N
D
O
O
No
I
think
it
depends
which
way
you
look
actually,
but
thank
you
chair,
yes,
I
mainly
I
have
questions
but
just
first
to
say,
and
just
a
few,
not
too
many
council,
chair
and
I
think
there
has
been
progress
with
this
in
terms
of
a
contract
that
will
help
to
tackle
air
quality
and
I
do
hope.
This
extra
information
means
that
we
can
push
for
as
many
electric
buses
on
these
routes
as
possible,
but
I
do
think.
K
Obviously
underwent
the
previous
procured
exercise
and
effectively
from
the
authority's
perspective,
came
back
without
any
anybody
willing
to
bid
on
the
authority's
contract.
So
we've
had
to
go
back
out
to
the
marketplace
with
a
revised
specification
and
increase
flexibilities
from
our
previous
specification
that
we
operated
and
we've
come
back
with
a
contract
that
is
effectively
financially
tightly
balanced.
K
As
far
as
the
authorities
concerned,
any
revenue
we,
obviously
that
is
generated
on
it
cost
associated
with
the
delivery
of
park-and-ride,
is
revenue
that
has
to
go
into
this
service,
as
opposed
to
the
many
other
commitments
that
the
authorities
got
and
the
results.
But
there
is
a
social
cost.
You
know
in
all
of
the
decisions
that
the
executive
made
and
the
council
has
to
make
these
decisions
on
a
day
to
day
basis
in
balancing
those
services.
K
What
we've
looked
for
is
to
the
effectively
as
editor
of
the
report
is
to
deliver
a
financially
viable
park-and-ride
service
within
the
boundaries
of
the
budget
that
the
full
council
is
set
and
in
order
that
we
have
to
consider
and
balance
those
issues.
We've
looked
through
that
and
they
outcome
is
a
park-and-ride
services,
a
service
to
this
authority
that
not,
as
far
as
I'm,
aware
of
another
authority
in
the
country
that
benefits
from
a
service
that
of
this
type
at
that
at
the
cost.
K
That
is
it's
going
to
incur,
and
it
delivers
four
million
people
to
do
to
the
heart
of
the
city
every
year
which
helps
with
the
economic
benefits
of
the
city
so,
and
that
is
done
in
a
way
that
is
minimal
in
terms
of
the
environmental
impact
of
those
four
million
users
they're
not
coming
in
cars.
They're
coming
on
our
Parker
ride
buses.
So
a
specific
analysis
that
I,
don't
think,
is
capable
of
being
done
because
effectively
having
gone
going
to
the
market,
it's
a
judgment
call
and
his
counselor
Wallace
said.
K
The
the
actual
judgment
call
is
not
so
much
about
the
absolute
cost,
but
will
might
will
the
battery
in
that
bus
fail
halfway
through
the
contract
and
therefore
I
have
a
hidden
cost
as
an
operator.
So
therefore,
what
do
they
choose
to?
How
do
they
choose
to
price
that
risking
when
they
come
back
to
us,
so
I
think
the
absolute
calculation
will
be
incredibly
difficult
to
do.
O
O
D
D
O
U
You
Jo
is
just
a
wider
comment.
I
know
this
is
an
issue
that
obviously
exercises
the
Green
Party
and
rightly
so.
Air
quality
is
very
important
in
York
and
I
just
asked
the
executive
whether
they
want
to
reflect
on
the
perhaps
great
opportunity
that
the
Green
Party
might
have
had
to
raise
this
very
important
issue
and
what
platform
they
might
have
had
if
they
decided
that
perhaps
they
aren't
a
part
time
party
in
York.
D
O
My
question
was
specifically
about
the
anti-idling
that
can
cause
the
dipole
mentioned
when
he
spoke.
It
does
just
seem
shame
that's.
Although
the
contract
is
extremely
detailed,
it
doesn't
actually
include
any
anything
in
it,
which
might
have
been
quite
a
small
and
specific
sort
of
thing
compared
to
the
previous
question
that
could
have
been
included
to
require
drivers
to
switch
off
and
to
have
a
policy
for
switching
off
and
to
implement
that
okay.
P
The
other
thing
is
that
the
technology
has
and
continues
to
move
on
at
a
pace,
we're
in
a
situation
now
where
all
modern
buses
will
cut
out
after
a
given
period
when
they
are
stopped
and
so
combined
with
the
increased
introduction
of
more
electric
buses.
I
think
idling
will
decrease
as
an
issue
as
time
goes
along,
so
so
I
think
we
will.
We
will
get
to
an
improved
situation
over
where
we
are
at
present,
specifically.
D
We
can
we
draw
this
discussion
to
an
end
now.
Are
you
ok
good?
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
other
members?
No
okay,
I
think
you've
worked
very
hard
on
this
Andrew,
certainly
and
others
in
the
team
I
think
the
process,
if
you'll
excuse
the
analogy,
had
many
stops
along
the
way,
but
probably
inside,
of
the
terminus.
D
Our
own
okay,
I
think
we
had
a
very
constructive
and
sympathetic
discussion
with
the
Transport
Minister
last
night
and
depending
of
course
on
the
results
of
the
elections
and
that's
anyone's
guess,
we
could
be
pushing
it
an
open
door
for
further
funding
in
New
York.
On
that
basis,
our
members
happy
to
accept
the
additional
recommendation,
as
proposed
by
councilor
wallet
as
little
f2b
overall
recommendation
in
item
in
section
2,
the
report
and
our
members
happy
to
agree
the
report
on
that
basis.
Yes,
okay,
thank
you
that
I
believe
there's
no
urgent
business.