
►
Description
AGENDA
1. Declarations of Interest
2. Minutes
3. Public Participation
4. Renewal of Sex Establishment Licence for Black Orchid (1st floor Tokyo), 3-5 Toft Green, York, YO1 6JT
5. Council's Constitution - Licensing Appeals
6. Urgent Business
For full agenda, attendance details and supporting documents visit:
http://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=606&MId=10526
A
A
His
meetings,
they
gathered
licensing
and
regulation
committee
monthly
in
September.
A
few
housekeeping
things
toilets,
are
at
the
dorm
on
right.
They
may
seem
state
facilities,
don't
believe
quiet
drug
plan,
dialer
first
I
see
visitors,
declarations
of
interest
to
a
council
to
have
any
additional
declarations.
C
A
D
You
chair:
this
is
an
application
for
the
new
intersect
establishment
license
for
a
sex
sexual
entertainment
venue.
A
black
bar
clip
first
loss
rates,
nice
soft,
green
york.
The
copy
of
the
application
can
be
found
Alex.
One
of
the
report
they
authorized
opening
hours
on
the
current
license
are
Monday
to
Sunday
2100
hours
until
3:30
hours
and
on
your.
D
And
the
Eucharist
is
from
1800
hours
to
over
30
hours.
A
sex
establishment
license
is
valid
for
a
period
of
12
months
and
a
license
all
that
must
submit
an
application
to
renew
the
license
before
the
existing
license
expires
if
they
wish
to
continue
operating
as
sexual
entertainment
venue,
a
copy
of
the
current
license
can
be
found
at
Alex
two
of
the
reports.
The
premise.
D
Of
the
legislation
relating
to
sex
establishment,
licensing
and
the
council,
writing
policy
was
adopted
on
the
27th
of
April
2017.
The
standard
conditions
for
sexual
entertainment
venues
were
proved
as
part
of
that
policy
and
can
be
found
at
an
expo.
I
can
confirm
that
the
consultation
has
been
carried
out
correctly
and
objection
has
been
received
from
North
Yorkshire
police
in
detail.
There
objection
can
be
found
at
some
paragraph
14
and
they
relate
to
the
operating
hours.
The
police
do
not
oppose
the
renewal
of
the
license.
However.
D
They
are
opposed
to
the
extension
of
hours
for
your
races,
especially
allowing
the
sex
selection
experiment
venue
to
begin
at
1800
hours.
The
police
has
have
committed
to
her
tea
to
the
council
policy
and
prevent
sexual
interference
in
place
spraying
2100
hours.
The
police's
objection
is
attached
and
X
5
a
map
showing
the
general
location
around
the
compasses
is
attached
and
X
6
when
considering
them
a
new
application.
The
council
does
not
have
an
unfettered
discretion
as
to
whether
to
refuse
the
application
our
grant
that
we
knew
the
mandatory
discretionary
grants.
A
B
A
G
D
A
B
A
A
H
Message
premises
in
this
is
here:
well
give
some
pulses
a
second.
Is
it
a
while
ago
I
think
the
problem
with
the
policy
is
that
the
SME
licenses
that
are
posted
didn't
pick
up
on
the
fact
that
we
have
these
attended
training
hours.
So
if
this
only
comment
really
was
in
regards
to
that
muscle,
so
it
only
really
relates
to
these
registered
specialists,
which
only
kind
of
qualify
on
the
previous
oppression
and
I'm,
not
aware
of
any
other
objections
as
I
think
it
was
more
with
crime
disorder.
Please
will
be
attending
today.
B
H
F
E
A
A
F
Happy
to
chair
I
think
ended
last
time
and
I
think
that
if
I
think
there's
even
less
reason
to
refuse
this
application
understand
this
establishment
already
if
their
perceptions
already
were
operating
these
hours,
wherever
the
policy
says
it
can't,
possibly,
you
can't
possibly
backdate
it
and
I
the
police
haven't
offered
any
objections.
Apart
from
the
fact
it's
it's
against
a
policy
was
adopted
after
this
establishment
was
gone
two
days
hours,
so
I
can
see
absolutely
no
reason
for
not
renewing
the
license,
as
supplied
for
and
I'm
happy
to
move
that.
B
A
Objectives
on
the
statement
with
regards
to
the
policy
that
we
have
there
as
now,
they
have
demonstrated
no
reason
why
the
current
arrangement
is
negative
or
disclose
any
problems.
It
is
within
the
policy
that
we
have
them.
We
have
discretion
with
regard
to
changes
and
deviations
from
that
and,
as
suppose,
we've
already
clarified.
This
is
an
Australian
renewal
so
with
us
to
support
Richard
just.
D
A
I
Within
relevant
legislation
is
provision
for
applicants
or
license
holder,
whose
grief
by
a
decision
made
by
officer
to
appeal
that
decision
to
the
magistrate's
court.
However,
the
city
of
your
council
also
offers
the
a
Greek
person
the
right
appeal
to
the
subcommittee
of
this
community.
Therefore,
the
three
party
has
two
weeks
of
appeal
to
the
avoidance
of
doubt,
and
the
importance
of
a
right
of
appeal
from
person
aggrieved
by
decision
is
not
an
issue.
This
report
is
simply
a
to
reflect
again
on
whether
it
is
appropriate
to
have.
I
Meeting
three
three-person
subcommittee,
which
went
to
magistrates
the
recommendation
here,
is
that
you
asked
for
counsel
to
change
concentration
to
the
single
appeal
procedure
for
dealing
with
licensing
appeals
by
a
statutory
route,
and
this
analysis
will
ensure
that
I
suppose
still
have
the
right
to
appeal.
However,
removing
the
right
they
go
to
the
subcommittee
incredible
vision
system,
avoiding
duplication
across
the
wider
public
sector
and
ensuring
that
our
justice
system
authorities
in
Regent.
He
also
removing
Greece
processes.
Something
needs
to
be
challenged.
Absolute
judicial
review
and
applying
the
council's
risk.
Metrics
scoring
the
approach
to
the.
I
C
Efficiency,
consistency
and
managing
risk
far
more
effectively.
I
guess,
I.
Think
I
would
just
appreciate
a
bit
of
background
as
to
why
wearing
in
this
position.
Is
it
some
sort-
and
you
know
just
a
sort
of
historical
resolution
or
a
minute
of
having
two
processes
sat
next
to
each
other
or
is
it?
Was
there
a
bit
more
behind
it
than
not?
A
B
B
Beings
of
both
processes
with
various
actions
and
appeals
I
want
to
see
the
advantage
of
the
junii,
but,
however,
I
still
think.
The
fact
that
you
can
appeal
to
members
from
a
subgroup
of
dis
committee,
as
well
as
the
option
of
going
to
college
and
would
have
anyway,
gives
the
person,
hopefully
a
better
feeling
of
justice.
H
B
A
The
real
as
chair
and
committee
I've
been
attending
meetings
with
other
licensing
chairs
as
the
other
West
Yorkshire
authorities,
as
the
real
reason.
Why
we're
so
keen
to
standardize
the
licensing
process
and
come
more
in
the
mid
mining
with
each
other
is
that
they
have
in
the
past
being
examples
where
individuals.
A
A
B
A
To
make
a
judgment
on
any
of
the
cancers
that
may
sit
on
a
subcommittee,
but
if
you've
got
a
applicant
who's,
hurt
their
application
or
refused
at
the
end
of
the
day
there
are.
There
will
be
reasons
given
for
that
and
if
the
members
decide
that
actually
there
they
want
brunt
license
instead,
malice
spoken
about
some
of
the
risks
may
be
through
a
more
prep
for
a
more
individual.
There
are
saying:
there's
a
political
risk
in
there
as
well,
because.
A
Reaffirmed
then
it
will
be
the
orchard
person,
radio
bringing
out
the
councilors
who
make
a
decision
to
grant
that
personalizes.
So
I
am
I
strongly
feel
you
know,
given
them
some
of
the
experiences
that
we've
seen
up
and
down
the
country
in
the
last
five
six
years.
With
regard
to
things
like
child
sexual
exploitation,
we
need
to
absolutely.
A
I
B
The
fact
that
one
can
go
to
another
authority
and
apply
for
a
license
and
it
could
be
granted,
are
not
the
same
price
tires
to
come
in
here,
the
things
with
whether
we've
got
the
information
flowing
that
says
this
person
is
applying.
Anyone
has
the
expenses
if
we
change
this
appeal
system
and
we
haven't
got
that
process
in
place
that
says
well.
Actually,
we
have
access
to
the
background
check
on
a
person
who
shows
up
and
they've
changed
their
name
and
Espenson
written
pieces.
B
D
See
you
aware
and
that
we
the
reason
now,
thankfully,
a
national
database
that
local
authorities
can
register
to
sign
up
to
that
we
can
put
on
refusals
or
replications
to
deal
with
taxi
drivers,
not
every
local
authorities.
I
talked
about.
We
are
under
the
authorities
that
are
so
wrong
with
the
West
York
authorities.
D
B
D
Cementum
apposition,
it
doesn't
give
any
more
information
because
of
caustics
protection.
It's
not
allowed
to
give
any
more
information.
As
a
West
Georgia
group,
we
have
looked
at
regarding
the
sharing
information
of
cyber
things
and
we
have
to
stick
with
in-depth
protection
requirements.
We
can
were
restricted
to
the
information
we
can't
share.
B
D
One
of
the
things
that
you
never
know
because
we
have
had
fretfully
we're
not
aware
of
there.
We
are,
but
some
other
authorities
have
been
aware
that
an
applicant
has
been
refused
in
one
area
and
then
has
changed
their
name
when
they
applied
in
another
authority
area
and
happens
it.
The
Box
just
said:
they've
had
an
application
refused
or
revoked
thanks.
B
But
I
remember
a
situation
where
we've
had
during
the
conversations
with
members
that
something
came
out.
It
was
then
picked
up.
So
it's
a
way
of
actually
saying
well,
we
can
actually
go
in
there
find
out
certain
information,
so
it's
protected
in
one
sense,
because
members
will
then
look
at
the
evidence
and
question
and
stuff,
and
we
did
we
found
out
that
that
was
certainly
discrepancies,
shall
we
say,
but
I
can't
see
how
much
gonna
change
if
we're
talking
about
just
taking
a
process
that
says
you've
got
two
options.
B
You
can
either
lots
of
members
of
this
committee
who
then
will
listen
to
the
appeal
and
decide
whether
the
appeal
is
right
or
wrong,
whatever
the
offices
and
what
is
supposed
to
do
or
whatever
or
they
go
to
car.
That
is
just
that
little
section
within
that
so
I
just
talk
about.
How
is
this
going
to
change?
Is
information
that
protecting
by
thickness
I'm,
not
saying
that
you've
got
to
go
I.
A
Not
only
are
you
standardizing
that
process
with
public
authorities,
but
you
are
potentially
reducing
the
possibility
of
someone
who
shouldn't
be
granted
a
license
actually
getting
one
on
appeal
and
that's,
whilst
that
is
unlikely
and
I
have
every
faith
in
members
of
this
committee
to
make
the
right
decision
if
it
was
if
it
came
to
that
ultimately
I
think
members,
when
we
make
this
decision,
whether
we
should
change
the
council's
Constitution
or
ask
for
counsel
changes.
Constitutional
with
regards
as
licensing
appeals
need.
B
F
Am
I
right
when
I
think
that,
in
fact,
because
it's
a
twin
track,
if
they,
if
they
go
to
majesty,
if
they
come
here
and
still
refused
when
they
go
to
magistrates,
they're,
actually
appealing
against
the
officer
decision
a
lot?
The
subcommittee
decision,
yeah
right
in
that
case,
I
I-
would
say
it
is
a
historical
thing.
I've
sat
on
taxi
licensing,
appeals
on
and
off
for
the
whole
time
with
Mina
counselor.
F
F
Given
them,
some
of
the
reasons
for
the
original
refusal
but
I
have
to
say
I
always
assumed
that
they
had
had
never
asked
the
question
that
they
had
the
right
of
appeal
to
magistrates
after
we
made
the
decision,
so
they
were
appealing
against
the
subcommittee
decision
rather
than
appealing
against
the
office
decision.
I've
never
asked
a
question
in
nobody,
though
it
was
always
well.
F
They've
got
right
of
appeal
to
magistrate
this
kind
of
thing
and
you
sort
of
don't
necessarily
push
them,
given
that
I
set
out
to
see
absolutely
no
reason
why
we
should
keep
our
appeals
process.
There's
some
other
over
the
years
says
some
other
extra
people's
processes
that
we
have
removed
used
to
be
something
called
the
ranked
appeals
panel,
which
was
very
interesting
but
didn't
actually
actually
do
anything.
F
People
still
didn't
pay
the
rent
and
they'd
already
been
to
court,
so
you
know
I
think
I
think
to
double-up
something
we
don't
need
to
I.
Think
it
really.
It
helps
us
in
removing
a
layer
of
bureaucracy
that
we
don't
need
to
do,
but
also
the
the
as
they've
said
it
doesn't
remove
that
they're
up
their
right
to
appeal,
but
they
still
have
that
democratic
right
to
appeal
again
to
the
magistrates
and
if
they're
not
appealing
against
the
subcommittee's
decision,
then
why
do
we
do
it.
G
And
their
processes
that
can
be
circumvented,
if
you
I
think
you
mentioned
the
various
reasons
in
which
a
refusal
in
my
area
isn't
necessarily
then
relate
to
other
areas,
and
my
understanding
of
taxi
licensing
up
is
that
there
has
to
be
so
many.
Lastly,
some
identification
checks
to
people
changing
their
names,
so
I
suppose
that's
that's,
really
a
question
about
its
visible
or
weakness
inheritance
in
the
National
system.
That's
the
taxi
licensing
berths.
G
A
A
A
I
was
made
aware
that
some
men
that
may
be
aware
that
their
wallets
of
tax
advice
to
see
this
games
to
the
Audion
government's
Committee
on
Wednesday,
sometimes
obviously
a
kind
of
way
out
of
that.
So
that
has
a
the
same
after
I
also
sit
on
board
any
governments
it
I
am
often
here,
I,
don't
know
what
the
views
of
the
rest
of
the
committee
that's.
The
report
should
be
seen
by
gambling.