►
From YouTube: Local Plan 18.12.19 Day 5 (4 of 4)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Thank
you,
sir.
We
very
brief
I
mean
I,
think
the
overarching
they
really
from
the
contributions
around
the
table
is
that
in
the
vast
majority
of
what
you've
heard,
what
is
really
to
the
application
of
the
methodology
rather
than
the
methodology
itself,
and
that
applies
with
particular
reference
to
the
allocated
sites
that
can
be
considered
at
fears
too.
B
We
accept
that
mr.
Kersey,
a
for
example,
has
raised
points
about
that
methodology,
but
a
number
of
contributors,
including
mr.
Smith
I,
think
mr.
Johnson
in
the
end
and
mr.
Butler
T
were
prepared
to
say
that
a
lot
of
this
is
related
to
the
application
of
the
methodology
rather
than
the
methodology
itself.
B
And
to
that
extent
we
say
that's
really
largely
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
or
of
application
individual
cases,
but
as
far
as
mr.
Kershaw's
points
are
concerned,
really
his
complaint
is
that
the
green
belt
wasn't
properly
assessed
at
the
outset,
and
he
goes
back
to
his
figure.
Seven
point:
I:
don't
want
to
labor
this,
but
again
mr.
Kersey,
looking
at
a
figure
that
was
prepared
for
strategic
purposes
as
the
endpoint
of
a
layering
of
constraints,
which
is
entirely
appropriate
at
that
level
of
assessment
and
the
assessment
proceeded
in
all
cases
to
more
localized
work.
B
B
Of
the
fundamental
aspect
in
knitting,
a
willing
landowner,
so
the
suggestion
that
the
council
needed
to
move
beyond
looking
at
a
thousand
parcels
of
land
through
the
site
selection
process
to
some
failed
by
failure
parcel
by
parcel
review
the
entire
Greenbelt.
Beyond
the
approach
that
took
a
strategic
level
that
we
say
is
not
right.
B
C
Thank
you
seeing
in
considering
the
land
that
needed
to
be
released
in
the
Greenbelt
in
line
with
the
exceptional
circumstances,
we
look
to
the
principles
of
their
heritage
type
of
paper
and
the
Heritage
impact
appraisals
to
inform
what
those
boundaries
should
be
with
specific
reference
to
sd7
arrest
sta.
In
both
those
cases,
it
was
identified
that
it
was
important
in,
according
with
those
principles
that
separation
was
required
to
ensure
that
the
original
districts
and
that
those
of
the
new
district
retained
separate
identities.
C
B
B
A
B
Mayor
thanks,
sir,
with
that
in
mind,
we'd
seen
three
point:
eight
and
three
point:
nine
as
being
capable,
hopefully
being
addressed
briefly,
knowing
that
you'd
be
returning
to
these
sites
of
stage
two,
but
in
short,
three
point:
eight
or
responses.
Yes,
the
proposed
boundary
for
each
site
allocated
for
removal
has
been
assessed
in
terms
of
openness
and
permanence.
B
Using
a
sim
approach
is
applied
to
the
inner
and
outer
boundaries,
albeit
addressed
more
briefly
9x5,
because
under
each
of
the
entries
on
the
detailed
boundary
issues,
that
is
where
permanence
has
been
taken
into
account,
and
we
sought
to
ensure
that
defensible
boundaries
contributed
delivering
a
permanent
Greenbelt.
In
that
sense,
under
each
of
those,
our
next
five
entries.
A
B
B
Very
well,
sir,
if
we,
if
we
do
that,
then
yes,
assuming
at
three
point
nine
years,
annex
five,
we
have
set
out
the
alterations
and
each
of
the
individual
entries
and
we've
done
that
by
identifying
exceptional
circumstances.
First
of
all,
we've
then
gone
through
the
individual
at
Greenbelt
purposes,
as
we've
discussed
already,
and
we
have
identified
the
detailed
boundary
considerations
and
we've
done
that
on
a
site-by-site
basis.
That's
to
be
read
alongside
the
strategic
approach
to
exceptional
circumstances.
Satellite
and
the
TP
addendum
I
was
already
discuss
today
and
I
max
five
also
takes
into
account.
B
A
D
Thank
you,
sir
and
you'll
recall
that
yesterday
mr.
Bewley
trailered,
our
answer
to
three
point.
Nine,
because
three
point
nine
is
dealing
specifically
with
an
X
6
and
an
X
sixth
to
the
addendum
to
TP.
One
focuses
exclusively
on
the
proposed
mods
I
want
to
do
no
more
today
than
just
to
highlight
again
the
fact
that
we
have
some
serious
concerns
about
the
justification
such
as
it
is
that
sits
within
an
X
six
for
the
proposed
modification
to
the
boundary
on
the
southern
edge
of
strength
or
village.
But
I'm.
E
It's
nearly
Christmas,
sir,
and
you
I
just
really
want
to
flag
up
that.
So
far
as
our
issues
with
the
council
about
boundaries
are
concerned,
we
take
the
view
that
that's
really
a
part
to
matter
and
tempting
it
as
it
has
been
at
certain
points.
During
the
day
we
hold
our
fire.
Therefore,
for
part,
two.
F
G
A
B
This
just
after
lunch,
I
think,
sir.
We
we
just
want
to
speak
to
Selby,
to
check
that
we've
got
consent
to
release
the
relevant
email
and,
as
part
of
doing
that,
we
knew
now.
We
need
to
speak
to
Selby
about
this
correspondence
that
ought
have
made
its
way
to
you,
so
we
want
to
wrapped
up
wrap,
wrap
that
up
and
speaking
with
Salvi
we'll
get
that
on
to
the
website
as
soon
as
we
can
through
those
discussions
and
then
update
you
as
part
of
our
homework
list,
sir.
B
B
The
approach
to
site
selection
assignment
has
been
conducted
on
a
properly
comparable
basis,
and
the
approach
to
alternatives
is
signed
for
the
reason
we've
we've,
given
the
methodology
for
the
release
of
individual
sites
has
been
set
out,
a
nun
x5
and
expressly
accords
with
Greenbelt
purposes
as
dolls,
the
review
of
the
only
royal
inner
and
outer
boundaries
which
has
been
discussed
previously,
and
so
for
all
the
reasons
we've
given
in
response
to
mr.
Gandhi's
previous
submissions,
we
say
that
the
process
fold
in
this
case
is
signed.
A
B
A
A
The
hearing
sessions
thought
the
contributions
they've
made,
and
but
many
of
us
sitting
around
the
table
are
frankly
paid
to
be
here
so
we'd
like
to
give
our
special
thanks
unto
to
local
residents
and
other
people
who
have
given
up
their
own
time
to
join
in
the
debate
and
discussions
I'd
like
to
thank
the
council's
team
for
the
hard
work
throughout
these
phase
1
hearings,
and
also
to
mrs.
crooks
for
helping
to
make
sure
that
the
phase
1
hearings
run
as
smoothly
I
think
at
least
as
they
possibly
could
yeah
mr.
A
mckormick
and
I
do,
for
which
we
thank.
You
very
much,
have
a
great
deal
to
consider
and
a
lot
of
things
to
make
decisions
about,
not
least
of
all,
and
what
the
way
forward
might
so.
As
a
consequence,
we
aren't
able
here
today
to
say
what
what
that
will
be,
whether
there
will
be
further
hearings
where
the
examination
will
continue
or
not,
and
if
it
does
precisely
what
form
that
will
take
we
need
to
think
about
and
that
amongst,
amongst
other
things,
I.
Think.
The
general
message,
though,
is
that
look.
A
Rest
assured
we're
going
to
undertake
our
very
best
endeavors
to
move
things
along
one
way
or
the
other
as
as
quickly
as
we
can,
so
that
everyone
knows
where
they
stand
as
soon
as
they
possibly
can.
I,
don't
think
unfortunate
as
anything
else
that
I
can
I
can
say
about
that
at
the
moment.
Yeah,
if
we
could
have
from
the
council
an
updated
list
of
proposed
main
modifications
would
be
very
grateful
and
also
we'd.
A
Ask
the
council
to
prepare
a
homework
schedule,
which
we
can
then
check
against
our
notes,
just
to
make
sure
that
you've
you've
got
everything
and
everything's
being
covered
and
as
well.
It
might
be
helpful
just
just
to
indicate
on
that
schedule
that
the
likely
timescales
for
getting
that
to
us
I
think
that's
about
all
I.
Can
all
I
can
say
really?