►
From YouTube: Planning Committee, 19 December 2018
Description
AGENDA (To view individual agenda items click on the links below)
1. Declarations of Interest 00:02:47
2. Minutes 00:03:27
3. Public Participation 00:03:45
4. Plans List 00:03:49
4a Land To The South Of Field Lane, Heslington [18/01416/REMM] 00:04:07
4b York Dance Works, 11 Redeness Street, York [18/01935/FULM] 02:05:31
4c Plainville Lane, Wigginton, York [18/02178/FUL] 02:26:12
For full agenda, attendance details and supporting documents visit:
https://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=132&MId=10597
A
Afternoon
everybody,
my
watch,
does
it's
half-past
four,
so
we'll
make
a
start.
Welcome
to
this
meeting,
the
planning
committee
I,
have
apologies
from
council,
looker
and
councillor
Flinders
is
here:
I
have
apologies
from
councillor
and
councillor.
Fenton
is
here
counts
to
both
councillor
Cuthbertson
&
korek
are
on
their
way
but
they're
in
traffic
and
then
perhaps
off
and
gets
the
car
back
and
find
there's
no
parking
space
anyway.
They
are
coming.
A
If
the
far
we're
not
expecting
a
fire
alarm,
so
if
it
does
go
off,
we
need
to
we'll
need
to
vacate
the
building
by
going
down
the
stairs
and
out
an
outside
and
round
I'm,
not
quite
sure
where
somebody
will
tell
us.
But
we
have
to
leave
the
building
and
if
anybody
needs
to
lose
their
out
the
door
and,
across
the
other
side
of
the
stairs,
I
remind
people
that
this
meeting
is
being
webcast
and.
A
B
You
chair,
we
should
acquire
a
personal
interest
in
relation
to
agenda
item
for
a
lunch
at
the
South
field
line.
Headland
turn
due
to
being
a
donor.
An
alumnus
of
the
University
of
York
I
have
consulted
with
the
council,
seeing
a
solicitor
who
has
confirmed
this
is
nontraditional,
so
we'll
take
part
in
their
debating
vote.
Thank
you.
A
C
A
D
E
Thank
You,
chair
I'll
just
have
a
brief
overview
of
the
application
and
the
update
will
be
at
the
end.
Services
received
matters,
application
for
approval
of
site
and
design
external
appearance
and
landscaping
to
provide
student
accommodation
for
the
University
of
York
on
the
East
Campus,
the
developmental
performer
to
colleges
north
himself,
North
yourself
down
here
and
then
a
centrally
means
to
suppose
referred
to
his
gateway,
green
and
then
to
immunity
block
to
more
residential
blocks.
Here,
a
total
of
one
thousand
four
hundred
eighty
bed
spaces
will
be
provided.
E
Outline
consent
for
the
development
of
the
site
is
a
campus
for
the
university
was
allowed
following
a
public
inquiry
in
2007,
both
north
and
south
colleges
will
be
accessed
for
it
via
a
central
hub
one
here
and
one
here,
North
College
will
provide
ten
blocks
of
accommodation,
provide
an
870
bed
spaces
and
situated
south
of
the
detention
basin,
which
is
about
here.
South
College
will
provide
490
bed
spaces
arranged
an
eight
blocks
of
accommodation,
haven't
been
reduced
from
10,
and
the
position
of
some
of
the
blocks
to
Lake
have
increased
along
here.
E
Gate
will
Green
Gateway
green
will
foot
take
the
form
of
an
informal
landscape
area
providing
space
for
events
to
accommodation
blocks
will
be
positioned
to
the
eastern
edge
along.
The
proposers
also
involved
the
realignment
of
lakeside
way
to
a
more
northerly
position,
which
is
this
one
here.
So
currently
it
comes
down
around
here
and
it's
section.
E
A
good
width
way
which
follows
along
here
and
comes
down
here
will
be
removed
as
an
update
and
objection
has
been
received
since
the
report
published
additionally,
a
construction
environmental
management
plan
has
been
submitted
by
the
applicants
in
considered
acceptable
by
offices
in
respect
Construction
impacts
upon
biodiversity
conditions
wanted
to
have
therefore
been
updated.
Thank
You
chap
thank.
E
F
Just
to
follow
up
with
that,
then
what
sort
of
area
is
going
to
be
other
public
going
to
be
excluded
from
square
yards
or
a
percentage
of
the
open
space
on
the
campus?
The
reason
I'm
asking
is:
it
was
only
a
few
short
months
ago
that
we
were
Satya
being
encouraged
to
allow
development
on
women,
Lane,
plane,
fails
and
the
pretext
of
that
are
allowed
to
pretext
to
that
was.
F
E
In
terms
of
the
public
accessibility,
there
is
a
balance
in
this
application
in
regards
to
the
biodiversity,
so
particularly
the
detention
basin
and
the
lake
have
increased
over
the
10
years
that
the
university
has
been,
who
developed
the
campus.
That
has
increased
a
lot
of
biodiversity
in
ecology,
and
currently
people
can
access
here,
and
there
will
be
some
barriers
along
here
and
along
here.
E
Mostly,
students
will
be
able
to
access
the
lake
from
these
boardwalk
here,
but
that's
about
it.
It's
it's
a
boardwalk
and
that's
the
reason
for
that.
The
university
of
proposed
ian
that
welfare
of
the
students
they
come
for
a
central
hub
and
then
they
are
retained
in
that.
So
they
can
monitor.
Who
comes
and
goes,
but
also
that
there's
a
requirement
for
the
diversity
to
maintain
that
levels
and
to
improve
and
enhance
that
level.
E
F
E
Know
the
areas
that
will
be
will
still
be
publicly
accessible
will
be
the
lakeside
way
along
here
this
central
green
area
and
the
pathway
at
the
top.
There
is
some
discrete
boundary
treatments
to
enclose
the
the
actual
colleges
themselves
around
the
lake,
but
there's
a
balance
to
allowing
public
to
access
the
site
is
that
it
can
impact
on
the
biodiversity
there,
which
has
increased,
and
we
have
been
taking
measures
in
this
application
to
ensure
that
that's
maintained
by
you
know
not
allowing
students
there
but
author
or
not.
E
So
a
part
of
the
proposals
and
for
the
development
plan
that
is
emerging.
We
as
a
council
would
want
to
see
before
the
the
University
and
the
campus
expands.
Any
further
is
that
accommodations
provided
on
campus
as
the
first
protocol,
so
the
application
is
for
is
to
provide
student
accommodation
for
first-year
students
and
foundation
year,
students
and
overseas
students
to
be
able
to
guarantee
accommodation,
on-site
and
then
any
over.
Overspill
of
that
will
be
given
to
any
of
the
returning
students.
H
G
E
Yet
the
two
oak
trees
will
be
lost
as
part
of
the
proposals.
We
would
try
and
maintain
them.
Unfortunately,
the
layout-
and
there
are
restrictions-
typically
think
it's
one
along
here,
so
with
all
the
development
around
it,
then
they
would
probably
be
quite
impacted
upon,
but,
as
in
detailed
in
the
report
will
be
a
substantial
landscaping
plan
that
will
overcome
the
loss
of
those
and
they
have
advised
that
they
will
be.
You
know
once
they
removed.
They
will
be
on
site
to
allow
that
biodiversity
to
increase
as
well
are
the
TP
owed
they're,
not
them.
E
A
I
A
J
Was
on
three
point
once
at
three
point:
one
eight
he
says
as
with
species
with
grassland
south
of
lakeside,
where
these
will
be
lost.
I've
already
heard
about
this.
What
may
be
and
may
not
be
about
the
habitat?
How
is
that
being
addressed?
The
fact
that
it
is
a
species
rich
rattler,
where
is
that
being
offset
as
a
far
as
it
being
reduced
own.
E
J
K
J
Is
building?
Does
that
then
going
into
Veals,
where
there's
already
rich
biodiversity
and
the
hey
cheese
and
everything
else,
which
is
what
we're
talking
about
the
oak
trees
that
are
part
of
the
original
hedge
lines?
They
seem
to
be
disappearing.
It's
just
a
right!
Well,
that's
good,
but
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
any
evidence
in
here
to
say:
I
was
with
the
office
has
conserved
how
you're
gonna
me
to
get
these
points.
I
mean
if
you
said
well
we're
going
to
create
a
large
piece
of
open
field
somewhere
nearby
to
compensate.
J
L
L
Down
here,
but
as
you've
actually
asked
them
to
move
further
away
so
through
that
again,
we've
ensured
that
Mario
dist
is
retained.
But,
yes,
there
will
be
a
lost
by
the
nature
building
on
that.
But
we
we've
got
to
a
point
where
we
think
it's
acceptable
and
as
much
of
it
will
be
retained
as
possible,
and
it's
for
us
to
make
the
planning
balance
that
were
then
recommended
to
you
is
acknowledging.
Yet
there
will
be
some
form
of
lost,
but
the
provision
that
would
provide
in
the
mitigation
measures
and
imbalance.
J
Given,
given
that
there,
the
presentation
we
had
some
time
ago
that
each
is
going
to
expand
and
expand
working
out
thousands
of
students
on
the
campus,
they
gonna
be
in
this
area,
you
can't
stop
them
so
that
diversity
will
not
work.
So
there
has
to
be
a
point
of
saying,
an
area
of
neighborhood
about
this
water,
something
to
actually
take
that
over
with
you
can
ask
people
to
say:
oh
people
volunteer
to
set
up
nature
reserves
to
offset,
and
that
is
protected
and
that's
made
clear,
but
there's
no
protection
on
these,
so
anything
could
happen.
M
L
Just
worth
pointing
out
that
the
students
won't
be
able
to
access
that
section
there
that
will
baby
was
the
male
just
pointed
in
here.
There
is
a
found
treatment
to
the
back
of
the
student
accommodation
there,
so
it
won't
be
that
the
students
will
be
coming
into
that
area
in
terms
of
biodiversity
idea,
so
he's
my
understanding,
he
might
be
better
direct,
better
dancing,
mats
of
the
agent
in
terms
of
the
being.
E
J
A
N
To
follow
up
on
this
point,
can
you
just
clarify
that
the
area
within
the
site
boundary
various
shown,
as
greens
miss
of
West
Western
age?
He
sat
condition
to
be
maintained
as
species
rich
grassland,
or
is
that
going
to
be
immunity
space
for
students
to
sit
around
on
you
know
use
this
as
a
means
you
space
to
the
students.
N
E
A
Ok
right,
ok,
thank
you
very
much,
we'll
hold
on-hold
far
for
the
for
those
questions.
If
we
can
find
somebody
or
from
from
highways,
if
not
we'll,
we'll
deal
with
them
after
the
public
speakers,
we've
got
two
three
four
five
public
speakers
I
forgot
to
say
how
this
works
for
those
who
haven't
been
before
each
speaker
will
get
three
minutes
to
address.
A
The
committee
I'll
give
them
a
30-second
warning
and
it
may
or
may
not
be
that
there's
questions
to
you
after
you've
spoken
so
but
then,
after
the
public
speakers,
we
go
back
in
into
debate.
So
the
first
speaker,
I,
have
is
Alan
Richards
who's
here
on
behalf
of
badger
Hill
residents.
Speaking
in
objection.
I
Am
I
on?
Yes,
you
are
great.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
Badger
hill
is
a
small
1960s
estate
stuck
between
campus
East
and
the
hull
road,
and
it's
been
bad.
It's
been
affected
a
lot
over
the
years
as
a
result
of
university
expansion.
The
explosion
of
HMOs,
no
family
houses
on
the
estate
now
really
to
speak
of
overflowing
rubbish.
Bins,
it's
going
to
be
a
bit
of
a
ghost
town
tonight,
with
it
being
near
Christmas.
I
At
the
moment,
parking
is
our
number
one
issue,
and
things
have
definitely
got
worse.
The
last
couple
of
years,
it's
obvious
to
residents
that
more
and
more
cars
are
being
parked
on
narrow
roads,
scruffy
grass
verges
a
number
are
abandoned
for
weeks
literally
weeks
on
junctions,
causing
obstructions
and
blind
turnings
many
of
the
people
illegally
or
badly
parked.
We
know
our
students
or
tutors.
We
asked
them.
One
shooter
was
parked
right
on
a
road
junction
for
five
weeks
last
yeah
every
car
had
to
maneuver
around
onto
the
wrong
side
of
the
road.
I
I've
got
photos
near
that
road
junction,
the
hardest
junction
of
eight
cars
in
a
line
part
some
of
them
illegally
between
two
junctions.
You
can't
see
to
the
next
Junction.
You
can't
see
coming
cars
coming
from
a
hundred
yards
away.
To
be
honest
in
term
time.
You
can't
confidently
cross
that
road
anymore.
It's
farcical
traffic
survey
is
done
kind,
no
problem,
but
they
avoid
key
facts.
I
Nobody's
listen
to
our
group
when
we
point
this
out
and
we're
now
making
our
own
regular
assessments
of
parking
numbers
and
we'll
continue
to
do
so
and
advertise
the
real
issues-
I'm,
not
particularly
optimistic
about
2019,
and
when
it
is
that
you
add
fourteen
hundred
more
undergraduates
on
campus
east
and
have
starts
staff
coming
in
as
well
with
extra
cars.
What
facilities
are
there
for
parking
nearby,
none
that
are
affordable,
students
and
staff
staff.
I
I
Is
not
a
big
ask
of
you,
please
consider
yellow
lines
or
a
sponsored
residence
scheme
or
whatever
makes
sense
interim
the
residence
group
is
going
to
report
illegally
parked
cars
to
the
traffic
hotline
and
do
what
we
can
to
get
the
move
and
we're
also
going
to
glean
advice
from
other
sources
about
what
action
can
be
taken.
Thank
you.
F
Just
like
to
thank
you,
mr.
Richards,
for
mentioning
our
list.
We
see
you,
we
see
a
slight
and
advance
of
this
problem
into
Ozma
with
as
well,
but
obviously
not
as
bad
as
bad
real
there's.
One
thing
that
does
surprise
me
that
you
didn't
mention
there
and
that's
the
one
area
of
land,
that's
remarkably
free
of
Pat
cows,
and
they
are
the
university
care
plaques
that
are
provided
and
I.
Don't
know
whether
you've
anything
to
say
on
that.
Well,.
I
I
O
I
I
O
C
Thank
you
chair
and
announce
your
concerns
on
parking
and
I
just
wondered
if
you
might
be
able
to
clarify
and
no
worries,
if
not
I'll
ask
the
applicant.
If
you
can
answer
this
question,
but
in
paragraph
4.3
of
this
report
I
mean
it
mentions
it
a
couple
of
times
in
the
paper,
but
it
talks
about
how
a
resident
parking
zone
has
been
introduced
in
the
Badger
Hill
area.
Now.
P
I
J
J
I
Mean
my
personal
opinions
are
largely
based
on
me:
walking
a
dog
two
or
three
times
a
day
and
I
can
say
there
are
a
lot
more
cars
part
now
cars,
a
bigger
aren't
they
than
they
were
as
well.
We
have
two
schools
which
have
expanded
substantially
in
our
area
over
a
number
of
years.
My
girls
have
been
to
both
of
them,
so
you
know,
I
know
what
happens
and
they
are
about
parking
at
both
of
them
is
an
issue.
I
Sorry
in
the
council
that
they
were
looking
at
potentially
closing
at
one
stage,
because
she
got
four
or
five
applicants
a
year
from
around
the
estate.
So
because
it's
such
a
good
school,
what
happens
now?
Is
everyone
comes
to
school
by
car?
A
large
number
of
stressed
parents?
Shall
we
say
a
particulate
nine
o'clock
in
the
morning,
pay
no
respect
at
all
the
road
markings
and
that
has
caused
near
misses.
I
believe
there
have
been
accidents
rest
of
the
day
is
not
not
a
particular
issue.
I
I
It's
been
like
that
and
as
we
see
that
at
other
houses
and
people
tell
us,
I
talked
to
people
as
I'm
walking
my
dog
round,
and
they
say
I
can't
get
my
car
out
of
my
drive
a
couple
of
times
a
week,
because
it's
blocked
in
by
parked
cars
I
can't
seem
to
get
out
because,
okay,
these
girls
are
not
parked
illegally
they're,
not
blocking
me,
but
on
such
narrow
little
roads
and
they
are
narrower
than
the
average
mistakes,
and
that
is
a
big
issue,
but
part
of
the
picture.
I
can't
see
to
get
out.
I
I
I
G
I
G
I
No
I
just
don't
see
how
you
can
bring
in
1,500
extra
residents
in
this
day
and
age
without
bringing
in
one
100
cars,
Thank,
You,
T
and
staff.
The
main
thing
that
someone
told
me
was
well
there'll,
be
extra
staff
weren't
there
and
they
will
have
transport
to
work
and
they
want
somewhere
to
go
and
they
won't
want
to
be
paying
for
parking.
Thank.
G
Q
Thank
You
chair
as
you'll
know,
York,
is
a
highly
successful.
University
continues.
Success
for
the
University
will
require
ongoing
development
of
this
part
of
the
campus
and
other
bits
with
the
right
mix
of
academic
office,
leisure
and
living
space.
Currently
about
5,700
of
our
students
live
on
campus,
the
balance
of
a
just
over
12,000
live
in
the
city
or
at
home.
This
project's
aim
is
to
bring
more
of
those
people
onto
the
campus.
The
scheme
is
very
high.
Quality
we've
learnt
from
what
we've
done
in
the
best
of
campus
East
and
from
campus
and
West.
Q
The
scheme
is
entirely
as
a
planning
officer
has
pointed
out
on
land.
That's
previously
been
consented
by
the
Secretary
of
State,
following
the
probably
to
inquiry
where
these
issues
were
foreseen
and
thought
through
and
considered,
and
the
green
buffer
zone
and
the
various
travel
and
transport
obligations
were
a
result
of
that.
The
council
has
also
recently
approved
our
updated
design
brief
and
master
plan
that
establishes
the
principle
of
us
doing.
The
next
phase
of
development
on
this
part
of
the
campus
we've
been
asked
questions
why
we
can't
build
at
the
other
end
of
the
campus.
Q
The
reason
for
this
is
you
want
to
make
a
place.
We
want
to
create
the
right
gateway
coming
into
campus
East
from
campus
West,
and
we
want
to
close
the
gap
between
campus
West
and
campuses,
because
it
feels
a
very
long
way
to
walk
from
one
to
the
other
and
that's
feedback
we've
had
from
students
in
terms
of
mitigation.
The
scheme
is
at
least
250
metres
away
from
the
village,
and
it's
not
built
within
the
buffer
zone.
Q
This
has
gone
very
well
and
we
intend
to
carry
this
on
throughout
the
year
in
terms
of
ecology.
We
are
very
proud
of
the
environmental
quality
in
the
biodiversity
we've
created
on
our
campus.
It
has
green
flag
status
and
my
teams
are
very,
very
proud
of
the
ecology
and
the
biodiversity
they've
created.
We
do
not
intend
to
damage
this
whilst
there'll
be
some
short
term
harm.
Q
While
we
can
strip
the
scheme,
we
believe
the
biodiversity
will
be
of
a
higher
quality
when
this
game
is
finished,
we've
also,
as
the
planning
officer
has
pointed
out,
moved
the
buildings
back
further
from
the
lake
edge
to
allow
further
biodiversity
to
flourish
in
terms
of
transport
and
parking.
The
original
outline
consent
does
require
us
to
do
30-second
things,
we're
required
to
monitor
traffic
flows
and
have
shown,
since
the
creation
of
campuses
that
we've
been
more
successful,
expected
in
moving
modal
shift
from
car
journeys
to
walking
buses
and
cycling.
Q
A
F
In
terms
of
the
travel
plan
on
the
modal
shift,
would
it
be
fair
to
say
that
that
is
it
the
expense
of
residential
surrounding
residential
areas
being
turned
into
carfax,
while
students
may
well
walk
insightful
from
those
areas?
The
second
part
of
this
question
will
be
have
you
got
any
occupancy
level
figures
for
the
cap
acts
on
the
university
yeah.
Q
The
university
car
parks,
particular
the
ones
at
the
core
of
the
campus,
are
generally
full
by
9:30
in
the
morning
the
ones
that
are
further
away.
We
have
some
car
parks
on
the
periphery
over
towards
the
Sports
Center
on
campus
East
they're,
not
always
as
full,
but
the
core
car
parks
are
full
most
days,
including
to
a
man
long
term
time,
I.
F
Q
Clearly
that,
if
that's,
if
that's
what's
happening
and
we're
only
just
getting
to
know
mr.
Richards
he's
come
along
to
our
group,
we
have
a
resident
parking
scheme,
your
part
in
badger
hill,
and
if
that
became
that
we
put
him
put
that
in
place
in
response
to
concerns
that
were
made
at
the
time.
We're
happy
to
have
those
conversations
and
to
work
with
residents
and
the
council
to
see
if
things
need
to
be
done
to
improve
matters.
But
the
travel
surveys
are
done
every
year.
J
Q
Vast
majority
of
car
parking
is
taken
up
by
staff.
There
are
very
few
students
that
park
their
cars
at
University.
There
are
several
hundred
that
have
a
permit,
and
that's
generally
for
medical
reasons
all
because
they
have
the
kind
of
course
which
Tanglers
takes
them
on
a
placement,
so
they're
a
nurse
there's
partly
in
the
university
and
then
partly
on
work
experience
and
the
charge
for
a
student
is
very,
very
small.
It's
about
35
pounds
of
years,
so
I
don't
think.
J
If
they
can't
get
into
the
car
park,
well
makes
the
difference.
Does
it
because
it's
nice,
the
K
I'd
love
to
do
this
as
it
as
the
point
that's
been
raised
within
this
about
your
future
intentions
that
these
beds
will
be
for
the
first
years
and
then,
if
there
are
any
vacancy,
then
they
will
be
offered
to
the
additional
students,
which
means
those
students
are
going
to
be
out
and
about
again,
but.
Q
The
point
I'd
make
is
that
having
1480
beds
does
not
mean
you
get
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
cars
that
there's
no
correlation
between
the
two
students
generally
do
not
have
cars
and
there,
and
we
would
be
supporting
people
to
move
into
these
into
these
beds
because
they
can
walk
and
cycle
around
the
campus.
So
I
don't
see
a
correlation
between
building
more
beds
and
necessarily
getting
more
cars.
How.
Q
J
You're
making
a
statement,
but
actually
you
don't
know
because
you
don't
know
how
many
vehicles
are
out
there
for
second
years
in
third
years
you've
only
given
plug
you
get
permits
because
of
certain
conditions.
You
have
accepted
that
the
majority
of
the
parking
is
for
staff,
so
we're
how
do
they
get
there
where's
these
clowns
that
said
well,
they're
gonna
come
on.
This
would
provide
so
they
can
meet
at
certain
points.
Whatever
we
see,
students
Arliss
has
been
said,
there
are
students
with
vehicles
outside
their
properties.
A
J
A
J
Is
if
we
know
that
second
year,
having
asked
to
go
into
private
accommodation,
if
I,
whether
it
well
being
York,
there
could
be
anywhere
there's
a
question
about
why
nobody
knows
how
they
actually
travel
there
to
say
well,
actually,
most
of
them
have
a
vehicle
and
therefore
we're
creating
an
issue
because
they
will
travel
to
the
University
and
go
I
can't
park.
We
stand
the
girl
I'll
go
back
over
here.
J
A
Q
O
Q
Been
with
the
university
two
years,
I
believe
it's
been
going
much
longer
than
that
I
took
it
over
and
began
to
chair
it
when
I
joined
in
November
16.
There
was
another
group
which
also
used
to
meet
there
oversaw
between
University
and
the
residents
and
the
community,
the
development
of
campus
East.
We
put
that
group
back
together
in
the
summer
of
this
year,
particularly
to
bring
this
scheme
to
their
attention.
We
intend
for
that
group
to
meet
more
often
throughout
the
whole
of
this
development
and
as
we
continue
to
develop
the
campus.
N
Just
to
clarify
you
did
say
that,
although
this
would
be
primarily
for
first
years
them,
whatever
vacancies
would
be
offered
to
second
or
other
other
year,
students,
so
I'm
just
wanting
to
know
if
some
of
those
students
require
a
car
because
there,
as
you
said,
they're
going
on
placement
doing
where
would
they
park
that
would
that
be
provision
being
made
for
them
within
some
of
the
campus
heading
to
Lisa's
car
park?
Yes,.
Q
I
think
that
would
be
the
way
the
way
forward
if
there
was
sort
of
second
or
third,
your
students,
so
we're
going
on
placement
and
how
to
leave
the
car
there's
a
certain
number
of
disabled
traces.
They
provided
within
the
scheme
if
it
needs
to
park
their
car
somewhere
on
campus
adapter
pocket
and
one
of
the
other
car
parks.
N
And
is
the
we
know
the
the
outline
application
had
a
travel
plan,
which
is
what
you're
working
to
in
terms
of
monitoring
displacement
parking
and
the
the
residence
parking
scheme
that's
in
place
at
the
moment
was
funded
by
the
University
as
a
consequence
of
that
this
place
may
be.
Would
you
be
looking
to
me
if,
if
residents
felt
that
this
was
a
solution,
would
you
be
looking
to
extend
that
to
other
parts
of
East
eight?
H
Q
If
that
was
shown
to
be
a
problem
through
dialogue
with
residents
and
with
the
City
Council
we'd
be
prepared
to
consider
what
mitigations
need
to
be
put
in
place.
I
couldn't
give
a
firm
commitment,
but
I
wouldn't
want
that
to
be
tied
to
the
conversation
we're
having
today
about
whether
the
scheme
should
be
consented
because
I
don't
think
the
two
things
are
necessarily
aligned.
N
N
Now,
to
my
knowledge,
part
of
the
original
clever
plan
was
never
implemented.
That
is
the
cycle.
Route
between
hearing
be
hesitant
and
West
Campus.
Is
that
something
else
that
would
be
looked
at
to
try
and
I?
Think
that's
resset
I
mean
obviously,
if
he's
gonna
be
over,
a
thousand
more
students
say
yeah
yeah
who
need
to
travel
to
private.
We
have
a
campus
or
into
the
city,
but
it's
gonna
have
an
impact.
Well,.
Q
I
think
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
missions
that
respond
to
and
I
think
the
first
one
is.
We
have
a
bus
that
links
the
two
campuses
together.
It
runs
very
frequently
it's
very,
very
well
used.
We
also,
of
course,
after
66
and
it's
variations
that
run
from
the
campus
into
the
city
and
back
and
again,
it's
very
well
used
and
comes
out
to
this
part
of
the
campus.
So
a
lot
of
people
use
the
bus
equally
a
lot
of
people
cycle,
but
there
is
a
cycle
way
along
the
road
next
to
badger
Hill.
Q
This
road
is
currently
excite.
Way
is
used
by
cyclists
and
would
continue
to
be
so
once
the
scheme
is
completed
and
I
think
the
scheme
you
refer
to
that
links
in
true
Heslington
I,
think
was
quite
contentious
and
whilst
the
university
will
be
prepared
to
look
at
that,
I'm
not
sure
the
residents
were
that
keen
so
I
think
that's
where
it
here
they
were
stalemate.
C
Q
Has
been
born,
that's
the
other
group
I
referred
to,
so
we've
got
the
good
neighbors
group
and
has
met
continuously
over
last
number
of
years.
Heslington
East
forum
stop
meeting
when
the
vast
majority
of
campuses
have
been
developed.
What
we're
suggesting
is
that
that
group,
which
we
met
previously
in
the
summer
to
discuss
this,
would
meet
more
regularly
to
be
able
to
deal
with
some
of
the
issues
that
the
previous
group
used
to
deal
with.
Q
C
Thank
you
and
and
I
guess
this
is,
for
my
colleagues
benefit
again
for
clarity,
you're,
absolutely
right
and
for
my
end
it's
noted
that
there's
efforts
being
made
to
accommodate
more
students
on
campus
and
but
I
suppose
it
is
relevant
for
us
to
think
about
the
bigger
picture
and,
if
we're
talking
an
extra
one
thousand
four
hundred
and
eighty
beds
on
campus,
which
is
welcome.
How
does
that
compare
to
the
overall
plans
to
expand
overall
student
numbers?
C
Q
A
really
slow
difference,
you
know:
well,
that's
a
really
good
question,
because,
with
the
current
economic
context,
we
find
ourselves
in
with
brexit
and
the
student
review
student
fee
review
by
Order
and
the
USS
pension
and
some
other
things
we're
not
quite
we're
not
sure
what
the
future
looks
like
to
some
extent.
So
we.
C
Mean
colleagues
might
want
to
build
on
those
questions,
but
very
very
lastly,
this
guarantee
to
first
years
and
accommodation.
This
guarantee
definitely
applies
to
on-campus
accommodation,
because
previously
we've
had
guarantees
where
the
guarantee
was.
We
will
find
you
somewhere,
but
sometimes
that
has
meant
you
have
gone
off
campus
yeah.
Is
it
definitely
on
campus.
Q
Is
it
I
think
I
think
it's
been
interpreted
in
the
past
in
a
number
of
ways
and
for
example,
we
have
a
nominations:
agreement
at
student
Castle
at
the
moment
where
we
have
about
300
students
that
live
there
and
we
try
to
create
the
right
kind
of
community
for
them
to
feel
that
there
is
it's
as
if
they're
on
campus,
but
obviously
they're
they're
not
but
going
forward.
We
really
mean
we'd
like
to
bring
students
on
campus.
R
Following
on
from
councillor
Taylor's
question
just
by
way
of
context,
so
the
1480
bed
spaces,
this
does
not
equate
to
1480
additional
students,
we're
looking
at
providing
on-site
on-site
accommodation
of
students
who
otherwise
would
live
in
the
community.
So
it's
not
a
case
of
university
expanding
by
1
for
a
0,
therefore,
we're
building
this
accommodation
for
that
expansion
in
numbers.
So
what
I
heard
was
no
it's
in
that
there's
not
that
correlation
is
that
am
I
correct
in
in
that.
Q
Q
Think
we
expect
that
some
some
of
this
will
be
filled
by
first-years,
who
may
be
new
students
we
didn't
have,
or
students
new
in
number
that
wouldn't
have
had
before
some
could
be
returners.
But
equally
some
of
this
space
will
be
filled
up
potentially
by
students
who
might
currently
live
on
campus
West,
where
we
need
to
do
some
refurbishment
work.
So
there's
a
whole
complicated
picture
to
work
out
the
supply
and
demand.
G
On
paragraph
four
point:
three
one:
it
talks
about
the
an
agreed
outlined
stage
is
a
car-free
development
and
then
it
goes
on
to
say
that
the
university
encourages
students
not
to
access
the
campus
in
private
vehicles
in
line
with
their
travel
plan.
Can
you
give
us
an
idea
of
what
the
travel
plan
says.
D
H
D
The
second
survey
is
campus
car
parking,
so
how
many
spaces
are
there
on
each
campus?
The
third
survey
is
related
to
off
campus
parking,
in
other
words
on
street
parking.
These
are
done
each
year
by
a
transport
consultant.
The
results
come
to
us
from
to
the
University,
and
then
we
submit
them
each
year
to
the
case
officer
at
the
council.
So
they're
done
they're
all
done
each
year,
but
they're
done
at
different
times
of
year,
depending
on
whether
you
want
to
do
them
during
the
time
when
the
students
around.
D
A
A
Q
A
T
Check
the
proposals
represent
cluster
four
of
the
phased
delivery
of
campus
East
granted
outline
commissioned
in
2007.
The
application
site
is
wholly
within
the
area
allocated
for
development
by
the
outline
permission
and
student
residences
are
unacceptable
and
approved
use
within
the
campus.
As
part
of
that
outline
consent,
the
earlier
phases
have
concentrated
development
towards
the
center
in
East
and
side
of
the
campus,
but
this
is
resulted
in
students
feeling
too
far
from
the
facilities
at
campus
West.
T
The
recently
approved
master
plan
for
cluster
four
identifies
development
to
the
west
of
n
at
West
End
of
campus
East
as
an
opportunity
to
improve
the
connectivity
between
the
two
campuses
while
creating
a
new
gateway
to
campus
East
as
you'll
ever
appreciate
it
from
your
site.
Visit
campus
East
currently
lacks
a
sense
of
arrival,
which
the
proposals
have
sought
to
address.
T
In
response
to
consultation
feedback,
the
original
proposals
for
South
College
were
reduced
in
density
and
moved
further
from
the
lake
as
you've
heard,
to
lessen
the
ecological
impact
of
the
development.
Increasing
the
distance
between
the
buildings
and
Lake
edge
has
provided
space
for
over
5,000
square
meters
of
new
planting
appropriate
to
the
waterside
location,
to
increase
the
biodiversity
of
the
site.
This
will
extend
the
breeding
and
foraging
habits
along
the
northern
edge
of
the
lake
to
the
benefits
of
birds
like
the
potage
to
north
college.
There
are
similarly
extensive
biodiversity
hunt.
T
T
Further
details
of
these
measures
will
be
secured
by
condition
for
a
construction
management
plan
has
also
been
provided,
which
sets
out
how,
by
diversity
other
two
segments
will
be
protected
during
the
construction
phase,
and
we
were
pleased
to
note
that
the
amendments
have
resulted
in
the
council
ecologist
supporting
the
proposals
and
the
withdrawal
of
the
yorkshire
Wildlife
Trust
subjection
development
of
new
student
housing
on
campus
is
supported
by
emerging
policy
d1,
and
we
hope,
therefore,
you
can
support
your
office's
recommendation
to
approve
the
application
linkie
chair.
Thank.
A
T
Not
the
specimen
trees
you
might
be
imagining.
The
development
requires
some
alterations
to
the
levels
within
the
site.
It
would
result
in
the
land
being
lifted
around
the
tree
to
the
entrance
to
the
site
to
the
edge
of
a
gateway
green
which
would
prevent
that
tree
from
being
retained.
It
would
just
it
wouldn't
be
viable
for
that
tree
to
be
retained
in
that
location
with
the
land
raised
around
it.
The
tree,
the
other
tree
is
located
on
the
edge
of
North
College.
T
So
again
it
would
affect
the
position
of
those
buildings
and,
as
I
said,
they're
not
specimen
trees
that
are
beautiful,
huge
oak
tree.
So
the
compromise
is
that
the
significant
open
woodland
planting
between
the
edge
of
north
college
and
the
detention
basin
and
the
two
trunks
that
would
be
removed
would
be
placed
within
that
area
to
maintain
the
habitat
value
associated
with
those
trunks.
J
T
J
T
T
J
Hence
that's
why
I
was
saying
about
a
different
area,
away
from
the
camera
to
balance
out
the
loss,
which
is
then
the
taxi
did
say
it
could
be
deemed
as
an
area
for
trust.
To
me,
somebody
to
take
you
over
or
whatever,
but
the
risks
do
not
think
the
risk.
Given
that
people
like
water,
they
are
there,
they
very
close
to
it
and.
T
We're
very
confident
that
they
buy
a
fantasy
enhancements
will
replicate
what
might
be
lost
and
the
whole
of
the
the
site
was
formerly
a
cultural
land
with
minimal
to
no
biodiversity
value.
Everything
that's
currently
on
site
has
been
put
there
as
a
result
of
measures
taken
by
the
University
as
you've
heard
from
mr.
tallboys.
The
university
take
those
responsibilities
very
seriously.
They
have
a
university-wide
ecological
master
plan,
which
this
proposal
sits
within
the
application.
Proposals
themselves
include
significant
landscape
enhancements
and
biodiversity
improvements
as
I've
outlined.
T
J
Have
to
bring
that
the
point
about
the
area.
Yes,
he's
open
agricultural
land,
but
there
is
a
was
a
historic
Lane
there
that
was
used
for
many
years
by
travellers
and
various
things.
The
hedge
is
very
ancient.
Those
fields
have
been
plowed
and
planted
for
many
many
many
years.
It
has
a
diversity
that
is
unique
to
areas.
It
also
encourages
the
kestrels
around
there.
I
cannot
see
the
cash
flows
being
you
might.
A
Think
I
think
you've
overdone
this
and
she's
given
to
be
a
very
good
answer
and
I
was
just
actually
thinking
the
very
same
thing
that
before
the
university
was
there,
there
was
no
water,
so
it
was.
There
was
nothing
related
to
that.
So
a
lot
of
the
above
biodiversity
come
about
because,
as
you
say,
if
they
of
what's
gone
on
there,
so
thank
you
very
much.
I
think
you've
got
tender
questions
there,
so
we
move
on
to
councillor
aspirin
who's.
One
of
the
war
counselors
will
be,
will
cancel
this
much
three
minutes
as
well.
U
Second,
one
chair,
as
you
mentioned
I'm
here
speaking,
is
the
the
city
councillor
for
Heslington
village.
Well,
I
should
also
say
that
Heslington
parish
council
has
asked
me
to
speak
on
their
behalf
today
and
Heslington
parish.
Council
has
now
responded
to
the
the
application
and
I
understand.
That's
been
included
in
the
three
published
papers,
but
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
little
bit
to
the
objection
from
from
headington
Parish
Council.
Primarily,
their
objection
is
to
the
siting
of
the
accommodation
and
which
involves
building
the
new
undergraduate
student
accommodation.
U
U
If
you
don't
consider
that
which
I
support
I
should
say,
if
you
don't
consider
that
there
are
for
me,
three
areas
of
additions
or
the
Heslington
parish
council
would
like
you
to
look
at
the
first.
One
is
around
mitigation
of
traffic
congestion
and
parking
nuisance.
We
don't
believe
it's
been
sufficiently
addressed
in
the
application.
U
This
may
already
be
a
condition,
but
if
it
is
in
seconds
to
ensure
that
that
regularly
continues
for
residents
contractors
and
the
university
throughout
this
two-year
build
period,
but
to
actually
condition
that
and
then
thirdly,
and
how
the
university
will
continue
to
mitigate
the
impact
primarily
of
anti-social
behavior,
there
are
schemes
like
night,
safe
and
bus
wardens
that
do
make
a
difference,
but
can
anything
be
done
through
planning
to
insist
that
the
University
continues
not
just
to
put
resource
on
campus
but
also
off
campus?
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any.
N
Two
questions:
firstly,
residents
obviously
were
aware
in
the
outline
plan
that
this
was
going
to
be
developed.
Is
this
sort
of
phase
of
it?
Has
I
changed
from
what
was
in
the
original
outline,
or
was
it
just
the
cat
fact
that
the
curse
has
been
this?
This
gap
before
it
actually
developed
for
food
residents
are
now
concerned
about
something
that
was
always
going
to
happen.
Anyhow,
I.
U
Yes
and
and
that
broad
it
was
the
third,
the
third
point
that
I
was
trying
trying
to
get
in
there
in
the
two
minutes
there.
There
is
a
lot
of
concern
about
no
level
antisocial,
behavior,
primarily
at
the
moment
students
walking
to
Halifax
College
in
terms
of
the
impact
on
on
Heslington
village,
but
but
elsewhere.
U
I
think
there
is
an
acknowledgement
that
there
are
schemes
that
do
occasionally
make
a
difference,
but
they
want
more
of
those
schemes
and
the
commitment
to
ensure
that
they
continue
throughout
term
time
all
year
every
year
and
don't
dip
in
and
out
and
there's
no
doubt
in
my
mind
that
this,
if,
if
approved,
would
make
those
schemes
even
more
important
I,
don't
know
whether
you
can
do
anything
through
planning
about
that.
If
you
can
condition
it,
please
do,
but,
but
if
not,
it's
certainly
something
that
I'm
sure
the
university
will
hear
and
keep
working
on.
A
J
U
I
can't
off
the
top
of
my
head
to
give
you
a
specific
number,
but
what
I
can
say
is
that
there
are
a
whole
host
of
parking.
Complaints
from
Fulford.
You've
obviously
got
the
lines.
We've
now
extended,
all
the
way
to
Broadway
and
fishy
game
due
to
impact
there.
Headington
village.
Obviously
now
is
res
part,
but
there
are
all
sorts
of
problems
in
the
time
limited
phase
in
the
res
park
zones
with,
for
example,
university
parking
that
was
appearing
along
university
roads
towards
Lawrence
Street
creep
previously,
so
ongoing
complaints,
always
always
a
lot
of
things.
J
J
Secondly,
what
the
what's
your
opinion
about
the
bio,
divided
diversity,
sections
that
have
been
puts
alongside?
Do
you
not?
Would
you
prefer
a
actual
dedicated
site
that
is
set
there
to
balance
out
away
from
the
college,
so
they
can
be
protected?
Maybe
parish,
council
members
at
the
community
could
take
it
up,
but
a
natural
area
specifically
like
we
know
we
can
offset
things
and.
J
F
F
Well,
yes,
I
see
today's
to
simply
provide
to
mark
packing
on
the
University
and
encourage
the
students
to
pack
on
it,
because
we've
seen
as
we're
being
told
today
that
during
the
working
week
the
parents
fall
when
I
say
these
cowpox
on
the
weekend,
they're
empty,
which
implies
to
me
each
loudly
fall
at
the
workforce
and
the
displaced
children.
Packing
is
still
in
the
residential
areas,
certainly
on
the
weekend
as
well.
F
U
F
F
U
S
This
is
a
joint
submission
from
myself
and
council
Neal
Barnes.
We
do
not
oppose
this
development
in
principle,
but
Aras
requesting
extra
conditions
to
mitigate
the
impact
of
resident
parking
in
the
areas
surrounding
it.
In
2006,
this
committee
imposed
a
section
106
condition
requiring
the
university
to
undertake
regular
traffic
surveys
of
the
neighborhood
for
a
period
of
15
years.
This
will
therefore
end
in
2021.
I
have
a
document
outlining
the
results
of
these
surveys,
but,
despite
requesting
an
update,
it
ends
in
2013.
S
Nonetheless,
this
document
shows
that
using
the
methodology
outlined
in
your
report
of
paragraph
3.2
that
University
of
York
related
parking
exceeds
the
threshold
in
zones,
1
7,
8,
9,
10,
11
and
12.
Since
that
time
the
university
has
expanded
student
and
staff
numbers,
so
it's
reasonable
to
assume
that
the
parking
problem
is
at
best
the
same.
However,
the
parking
restrictions
in
place
in
the
res
park
scheme
mentioned
in
your
report
covers
only
part
of
zone
9,
which
is
badger
Hill
and
therein
lies
part
of
the
problem.
S
Whilst
a
few
streets
covered
by
the
university
funded
scheme
helps
those
streets,
the
parking
issues
are
displaced
into
the
neighboring
neighboring
streets
and
estates.
Members
of
this
committee
need
to
know
what
the
actual
position
is
and
at
present
neither
you
nor
week,
not
ward
councillors.
Do
this
committee
is
acted
in
the
past
to
mitigate
the
impact
of
university
expansion
and
I'm
sure
would
do
again
if
it
was
clear
that
there
is
both
an
existing
problem
and
in
a
potential
future
problem
caused
by
granting
this
application.
S
The
impact
of
the
existing
scheme
is
that
the
streets
in
badger,
Hill
and
Newman
park
that
do
not
have
schemes
will
clearly
suffer
from
parking
by
staff
and
non-resident
students
who
leave
their
cars
for
the
day
and
walk
into
the
university
to
avoid
paying
the
pay
and
display
carpark.
The
university
has
a
cap
of
1500
onsite
parking
spaces
imposed
when
the
staff
and
student
numbers
were
markedly
below
their
current
levels
in
2013
they
were
operating
at
ninety
one
point:
two
percent
capacity.
S
Complaints
about
non
resident
parking
constitute
a
significant
part
of
ward
councillors
with
caseloads.
The
in
fact,
in
the
effect
of
this,
has
been
recognized
in
recent
planning
refusals
for
her
Chalmers
due
to
the
lack
of
off
street
parking
in
a
congested
area
within
badger,
hill
and
Newland
past.
S
These
refusals
have
been
supported
when
appeals
have
been
dismissed
this
ship.
This
shows
that
residents
are
concerned
for
valid
reasons.
I
have
discussed
this
with
the
council
parking
team,
who
also
feel
like
developments
like
this
do
have
an
impact
on
neighboring
areas.
I
feel
these
views
should
have
been
reflected
in
the
report.
I
would
therefore
ask
for
a
further
deferment
of
this
application
in
order
for
members
of
this
committee
to
see
the
updated.
S
S
Think
many
of
the
questions
that
have
been
raised
by
committee
today
would
be
addressed
by
a
detailed
traffic
survey
results
with
the
impact
of
university
expansion
and
we're
not
just
talking
about
students
there,
albeit
1500
students
I,
would
dispute
that
it
will
have
no
impact
on
additional
car
parking,
but
we're
also
talking
about
two
additional
college
box,
so
you're
talking
about
additional
staff
parking
there
you've
already
heard
for
that.
The
car
parks
are
full.
S
You
add
students,
you
are
additional
staff.
The
car
parks
are
full:
we've
put
a
limit
of
1,500
on
car
parking
spaces.
Where
are
they
going
to
go?
That's
what
we
need
to
know
and
if
we
know
that,
then
we
can
put
additional
conditions
in
place.
We
don't
know
that,
because
we
haven't
seen
the
survey
results,
I've
got
2013,
we've
we've
asked
and
haven't
had
access
to
the
more
updated
I
think
is
number
eight,
with
the
counselor
asked
and
for
supply.
In
these
figures.
R
Just
on
the
issue
of
a
condition
walk
given
that
there
is
a
gap
in
knowledge
and
information.
What
do
you
think
a
condition
might
look
like
well
because
then
we
don't
defer
and
then
just
have
a
discussion
and
say
we're
not
no
further
forward
in
identifying
what
an
appropriate
condition
might
be.
But
given
what
we
do
know,
what?
What
do
you
think?
A
robust,
an
appropriate
condition
might
be
that
we
could
either
agree
here
or
at
a
future
meeting.
B
A
S
As
I
pointed
out
in
my
submission
in
those
streets
where
res
park
exists,
there
isn't
an
additional
parking
problem.
I
would
look
at
res
parking,
the
whole
of
Badger
Hill
and
the
whole
of
Newlin
Park
and
a
suspect
council.
Raspbian
would
also
ask
for
the
bits
of
Heslington
village
that
aren't
already
res
parked.
S
F
I
was
just
going
to
bring
up
the
simple
solution
again
in
the.
If
this
traffic
survey
shows,
the
current
state
of
play
is
bad
and
the
projected
state
of
play
is
bad.
What
would
you
do
rather
than
just
simply
rest
park
or
double
yellow
lines
which
is
just
chasing
the
problem
away
further
away
because
it'll
just
displace
it
somewhere
else?
S
S
A
S
J
This
parking
issue
do
you
think,
actually
having
the
cash
share
policy
would
work
and
that's
not
just
for
the
students,
but
also
for
staff.
Absa,
try
and
reduce
the
number
of
car
parking
spaces
that
are
used
at
this
present
time
and
that
there
is
a
policy
that
we
could
maybe
put
into
say.
There
has
to
be
X
amount
of
cash,
a
car.
A
Very
much
right,
that's
all
the
speakers
before
we
go
into
debate,
can
I
remind
members
that
this
at
this,
the
university
is
governed
by
very
extensive
outline
permission
that
was
granted
on
appeal
and
by
the
secretary
of
state.
So
some
of
the
things
that
have
been
mentioned
today,
we
cannot
influence.
We
can't
suddenly
decide
to
allow
them
three
times
as
many
car
parks
as
they've
got.
A
Those
kind
of
things
are
governed
by
the
outline,
so
there
are
some
things
that
I
don't
think
that
we
can
resolve
necessarily
and
I
also
think
that
this
application
cannot
be
used
to
try
and
solve
all
the
parking
ills
associated
with
the
University.
However
far
it
goes,
I
have
a
question
I'd
like
to
ask
to
councillor
Taylor
before
we
start
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
answer
this,
but
being
as
you're
the
one
who's
been
at
university
most
recently
around
this
table.
A
A
G
Chair
I'd
like
to
ask
for
a
deferment
on
this
until
we
get
some
up-to-date
information
on
the
traffic
surveys
and
to
request
the
highways
officer
to
attend
the
next
time
that
we
look
at
this
application.
If
the
committee
is
minded
to
approve
this
I'd
like
to
look
at
a
planning
condition,
that's
in
the
body
of
the
survey
that
could
be
used
as
part
of
the
basis
for
a
planning
condition
on
this
application
and
also
in
respect
to
the
section
106,
which
is
which
was
first
created
in
2006
and
the
bill.
G
L
G
L
You
can't
ask
for
well
the
original
outline
Commission
had
a
legal
agreement
with
it
and
that's
a
point
where
you
need
to
secure.
If
you
can't
then
ask
for
another
legal
agreement
for
a
reserved
matters
that
was
secured
as
part
of
the
outline
permission,
the
outline
permission
was
your
permission.
In
principle.
It
looks
of
all
these
things.
Your
outline
permission,
ask
for
your
traffic
service
and
everything
extra
that
you're
asking
now
has
already
been
covered.
As
part
of
the
outline
permission.
There's
surveys
that
are
required
as
part
of
the
outline
there
are
ongoing.
L
G
Understand
what
you're
saying
yes
but
I,
don't
think
that's
been
brought
to
the
committee's
attention.
I
don't
have
had
a
chance
to
to
look
at
the
section
106
and
to
see
the
correlation
between
the
two.
So
so
in
respect
of
a
deferment
that
could
be
furnished
with
a
copy
of
the
section
runners,
yeah.
L
Just
for
my
understanding,
you
want
to
see
a
copy
of
the
section
106
for
the
original
outline
permission.
If
you
were
to
defer
it,
you
want
that
information
put
as
part
of
your
reserve
as
part
of
the
reserve
masters
pack
of
information.
Is
that
what
you're
asking
for
and
as
you
can
I
focus
the
offsite
parking
missions
yet,
but
that's
fine
that
dances
are
the
offsite
parking
measures,
but
you
can
amend
it
as
part
of
the
reserve
matters.
No.
A
O
You,
chair
I
think
it
might
be
making
much
the
same
point,
but
can
I
just
say
a
few
words.
I
would
agree
that
to
provide
accommodation
on
campus
I'd,
really
mister
tell
boys
he's
on
the
whole
a
better
alternative
and
accommodating
students
in
a
proliferation
of
HMOs,
particularly
in
the
budget
hill
and
hole
road
areas
of
the
city
as
one
town
cabinet.
Member
for
housing
I'm.
O
Only
too
well
aware
of
the
difficulties
which
can
arise
when
a
substantial
number
of
young
people
away
from
home
for
the
first
time
or
even
constraints
of
home
impact
on
an
established
community,
I'm
encouraged
by
the
commitment,
mr.
Tarr
boys,
to
beefing
up
the
good
neighbors
group,
something
which
perhaps
has
not
received
the
pro
rotation
by
the
university
in
the
past.
But
I
would
like
to
see
that
commitment,
backed
up
by
some
form
of
conditional
section,
106
agreements
and
that's
where
I
do
the
counselors
Shepherd
to
govern
the
management
of
the
campus.
O
That
measurement
obligation
on
the
university
should
cover
parking
noise,
litter
waste
and
general
student
activity
has
indicated
in
Para
3.22
in
the
public
protection
section
of
the
report.
These
are
overriding
lis,
important
considerations
which
have
a
detrimental
impact
which
can
have
a
detrimental
impact
on
amenity
and
quality
of
life
of
adjoining
residents,
as
we've
heard
from
local
councilors
and
the
residents
here
tonight,
I
would
support
a
deferment
to
explore
a
solution
which
offers
a
management
regime
obligation
on
the
University.
A
N
I
think
I
agree
with
the
point
that
was
insufficient
answer
in
here.
We've
heard
the
wall
counselor
say
that
there
was
about
half
a
dozen
sectors
which,
in
the
information
that
he
had,
that
was
available
up
to
2013,
was
in
breach
of
exceeding
the
conditions
set
out
in
the
section
106
C
dreamed
about
offsite
parking.
Now
it
seems
to
me
that
if
the
ward
council
has
been
unable
to
access
information
for
that
5-year
period
between
2013
and
2018,
how
are
we
supposed
to
make
a
decision
on
whether
or
not
that
section
106
agreement
is
working?
N
N
A
Okay,
just
to
remind
you,
though,
again,
though,
that
the
cat
is
part
of
the
outline
I'm
talking
about
okay,
no,
no,
okay,
I'm
just
just
remembers
remind
other
members
that
you
know.
Some
of
these
are,
you
know,
were
put
on.
The
conditions
that
were
put
on
an
outline
were,
with
the
full
knowledge
of
how
many
people
there
will
event
would
eventually
be
on
campus.
These
aren't
extra
people
on
top
of
what
was
approved
at
the
outline
council,
Thank.
F
You
chair
I'd
like
to
support
colleagues
with
the
request
for
deferment
as
much
as
anyone
I'd
like
to
see
a
higher
percentage
of
accommodation
on-site,
but
not
at
the
expense
of
packing
chaos
in
the
surrounding
areas.
So
I'd
like
to
say
that
the
traffic
surveys
at
certain
electracy
highways
officer
a
year
which
I
thought
was
very
remiss
bearing
in
mind
that
one
of
the
issues
that
everybody
wanted
to
raise
in
the
last
time
when
it
was
deferred,
was.
F
I,
don't
want
to
say
is
when
the
surveyor
comes
back.
Is
that
we
all
look
at
it
and
say:
yes,
it
hasn't
worked
and
nobody
addresses
the
simple
solution,
because
I
appreciate
what
you've
said
about
the
very
stringent
outline
permission,
but
that
was,
in
my
opinion,
largely
blown
out
of
the
water
in
June
2015
when
we
approved
the
retail
development
and
the
surgery
in
the
landscape
buffer
zone,
which
was
equally
stringently
applied
in
the
outline
permission.
F
A
R
You
sure,
if,
if
we,
if
there
is
support
for
deferring
the
application,
I'm
still
not
clear
even
with
having
had
sight
of
the
the
transport
surveys,
will
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
nature
of
the
problem
which
I
think
from
the
speakers.
They've
they've
certainly
brought
its
life,
but
given
that
we're
being
told
that
things
were
agreed
in
2007,
which
we
cannot
reopen,
I'm,
not
sure
we
will
be
really
in
in
any
better
position
than
we
are
now
to
make
a
decision.
R
I'm
a
I'm,
a
miss,
misunderstood
or
misinterpreted
that,
but
it
we
may
be
coming
back
to
to
discuss
the
same
issues
and
come
to
the
conclusion
that
there's
very
little.
We
can
do
about
it
because
of
conditions
and
section
106
agreements
that
were
agreed
upwards
of
10
years
ago.
So
I'm
genuinely
undecided,
because
I'm
not
really
sure
what
value
it
would
bring.
W
A
W
Apologies
and
a
section
106
crewman
can
be
varied,
but
it
can
only
be
varied,
provided
that
each
party
T
Agreement
consents
to
variation.
Moreover,
any
obligation
comprised
within
a
section
106
group
as
varied,
are,
as
in
the
original
is
constrained.
It
must
relate
to
the
principles
of
the
development
and
normal
rules
regarding
playing
obligations.
So
the
straight
answer
is
yes:
it
can
be
varied.
K
H
W
Excuse
me
now,
if
the
cancer
seeking
to
impose
a
variation
on
that
agreement
that
relates
to
the
original
consent.
So
it's
the
existing
consented
scheme,
albeit
an
outline
form
concern,
so
I,
would
caution
against
using
the
reserved
matters
application
as
a
means
of
revisiting
the
principle
of
the
development
which
was
established
and
sanctioned
following
the
process
ten
years
ago.
W
C
L
Just
to
advise
members
further
in
terms
of
the
traffic
surveys
that
you're
talking
about
they
are
excuse
me.
They
are
covered
under
the
outline
permission
and
we
will
be
getting
them
in
the
early
New
Year
in
terms
of
what
that.
So,
we
know
that
they've
happened
and
we
know
that
they're
ongoing,
and
we
know
that
if
there
are
potential
things
that
are
happening
in
cars
and
issues
that
we
work
with
the
university
to
resolve
those.
L
But
we
can
do
that
as
part
of
the
outline
permission
as
it
stands,
and
there
are
ways
and
means,
through
those
conditions
that
were
set
there,
that
we
can
look
and
reassess
if
needs
be,
if
anything
needs
doing
in
terms
of
the
residents
parking
permit
and
other
measures.
So
they
were
covered
under
the
outline.
L
But
the
outline
gave
permission
for
these
amount
of
students
and
more
I,
don't
know
exactly
what's
up
in
my
head,
the
students
to
be
present
at
the
site,
so
it
was
assessed
as
part
of
the
outline
permission,
how
many
students
were
going
to
be
on
site
and
that
was
taken
into
account.
Hence
the
condition
for
the
review
of
the
parking
permits.
We
had
sorry
we
clicked
yearly,
and
that
is
happening
and
we
are
aware
of
it
and
we
working
with
it
and
the
map.
L
There
has
been
changes
through
that
in
terms
of
the
residents
parking
in
the
area.
So,
yes,
we're
aware
of
it
and
yes
we're
doing
it,
but
we're
doing
it
as
part
of
the
outline,
rather
than
this
permission.
So
it's
not
that
things
aren't
being
done.
It's
just
that,
it's
being
done
to
a
condition
of
the
outline.
A
G
B
You
share
once
again
I
wish
to
support
the
comments
made
by
councillor
Fenton
well.
Size,
share
members,
frustration;
the
fact
that
we
don't
have
highways
officer
here
I,
don't
believe
that
the
information
within
the
traffic
surveys
will
provide
us
any
any
information
which
would
be
relevant
to
deciding
upon
the
reserved
matters
application
in
front
of
us.
So
I'd
like
to
praise
that
and
make
decision
this
evening.
I'll.
V
Just
interested
that
we
keep
talking
about
extra
huge
numbers
of
students,
this
is
part
of
the
normal
students
coming
and
and
lots
and
lots
of
students
graduating.
So
if
they're
not
in
this
accommodation,
then
they're
out
in
the
city,
and
so
the
problem
will
continue
in
this
tiny
city
with
too
many
vehicles,
whether
they're
living
on
campus
or
not.
So,
I
really
don't
understand
what
this
seems
like
a
better
way
of
resolving
it,
then
they're
not
having
accommodation
on
the
campus
councillor,
Galvin.
M
German
I
don't
want
to
prolong
this
any
longer.
I've
sat
in
this
committee
now
for
a
number
of
years
and
there's
been
a
constant
complaint
that
students
accommodation
should
be
accommodated
on
the
campus.
We
shouldn't
have
any
HMOs.
We
shouldn't
have
any
stirs
student
halls
of
residence.
They
should
all
be
accommodated
in
the
campus,
and
this
at
least,
is
an
attempt
to
accommodate
fifteen
hundred
fourteen
hundred
and
eleven
t
three
or
whatever,
to
do
just
that.
No
additional
students
I
do
understand
the
issue
of
car
parking.
M
I
have
a
very
good
friend
lives
on
budget
Hill,
and
let
me
tell
you
Ben's
my
ear.
Every
time
you
see
him,
but
unfortunately,
whatever
we
do.
This
is
ultimately
an
insoluble
problem,
because
this
mark
water,
cess,
council
water,
says
you're.
Just
movie
town
people
buy
cars
and
they're
going
to
use
them
and
I
do
understand,
because
I'm
and
I
would
say
in
a
similar
situation,
but
where
I
live
the
used
to
be
no
cars
parked
on
the
road
now
have
an
evening.
M
It's
chock-full
all
the
waitresses
three
and
four
car
households,
so
in
essence
that
universities
damned
if
they
do
and
damned.
If
they
don't,
there
was
the
public
enquiry
in
two
thousand
whenever
it
was
2007
that
set
out
fairly
stringent
conditions
and
I'm
2006,
alright
I'm
twelve
months
out,
I'm
relatively
relaxed
it.
We
can't
do
much
about
those.
M
Quite
frankly,
in
my
book
it's
a
very
simple
issue.
If
you
think
there
is
a
problem
with
car
parking,
if
you
think
there's
a
problem
because
two
oak
trees
are
gonna,
be
cooked
down
and
I
happen
to
be
one
of
these
people
that
believes
that
big
trees
and
houses
don't
go
together.
If
you
believe
that
biodiversity
is
going
to
be
damaged,
if
you
believe
that
setter
etcetera
then
vote
against
it.
If
you
don't
believe
that
those
are
the
serious
issues,
then
vote
for
it
and
I'm
I'd
always
been
moved
and
seconded
to
be
deferred.
A
A
C
You
chair
and
sort
of
put
on
record
and
because
it's
worth
saying
and
I
think
most
members
around
here
would
agree
that
you
know
we.
We
support
the
growth
and
success
of
the
university,
but
it's
crucial
that
it's
managed
properly
and
are
largely
buy
into
your
approach.
It
just
says
you
know
we
need
to
be
a
bit
more
simplistic
about
this
and
just
see
it
for
what
it
is,
but
the
fact
that
these
last
results
went
well,
it's
been
20
since
2013,
since
we've
had
information
from
the
survey
since
two.
C
You
know
that
that
might
well
be
the
case,
but
we've
only
got
up
to
2013
and
since
then,
since
it
since,
since
then,
a
new
college
is
opened
in
constant
time,
developing
the
piazza
building
on
Heslington
East,
and
there
is
the
very
much
needed
and
much
welcomed
retail
provision
on
the
site
which
that
camp
was
desperately
needed.
So
that
has
been
considerate
change
on
that
campus
and
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
and
useful
to
know
what
the
situation
is
now
following
now
is
free,
quite
significant
changes
since
2013
I.
Don't
think
that
some
reasonable.
V
L
Sorry,
members
just
members
just
to
clarify
just
to
clarify:
we
have
HUD
servers
from
them
since
2013
it
was.
We
were
asked
for
an
example
of
a
survey,
and
that
was
from
2013.
We
have
been.
There
has
been
surveys,
it
was
just
the
one
that
we
were
asked
to
given
as
an
example
was
from
2013.
We
have
had
them
since
then
for
clarification.
Okay,.
F
Just
in
relation
to
what
was
set
from
the
floor
and
a
fully
agree
with
the
Planning
Council,
we
should
be
asking
the
officer,
but
because
there's
nobody
here,
absolutely
not
going
to
approve
something
when
the
current
parking
situation
of
bad
real
clearly
doesn't
work
and
we've
nobody
to
question
about
it.
Okay,.
A
Well
from
the
chair
of
I:
it's
quite
right.
We
want
we
want
BISM.
We
want
more
people
living
on
campus
students
living
on
campus
rather
than
off
campus.
That's
a
continual
complaint
around
this
room
has
been
for
a
number
of
years
and
as
councillor
Gavin
said,
you
know
when
they
do
it,
then
we
we
still,
we
still
aren't
happy
I,
think
we've
councillor
Taylor
did
say
that
minority
of
these
first
year
students
have
cars
and
I
would
say
from
my
experience
with
I.
A
Don't
know
many
students
now,
but
we
do
work
with
them
and
hardly
any
of
them
have
cars
in
the
first
year.
So
it's
not
as
if
we're
going
to
have
1400
extra
cars.
If
this,
if
this
development
goes
ahead,
I
think
that
members
around
I'm
afraid
that
members
around
the
table
are
trying
to
solve
the
the
existing
problems
in
the
residential
streets.
A
Extra
double
area
lines
is
that
it
gives
a
process
for
the
university
and
our
officers
to
follow,
and
we
would
not
expect
this
committee
to
be
looking
at
the
results
of
those
all
the
time.
That
is
what
officers
are
there
to
do
to
look
at
those.
Those
results.
I
think
that
if
we
do
defer,
this
I
am
sure
we
will
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
we
do
the
results
of
those
surveys.
We
will
be
saying
to
officers.
Well,
it's
all
for
we're
going
to
go
away
and
introduce
a
risk
park
zone.
Well.
A
If,
though,
if
those
surveys
show
that
that's
what's
needed,
that's
what
officers
will
do
they
won't
need
us
to
do
it.
So
therefore,
I
I
think
that,
on
the
basis
of
what's
in
front
of
us,
we
should
be
determining
this
today.
It
is
been.
It's
been
moved
by
Councillor,
Shepherd
and
seconded
by
Councillor
car
I'm.
A
J
The
thing
is
these:
yes,
the
106
you
stare
does
various
things
that
being
agreed,
but
it's
about
making
sure
there
is
a
commitment
from
both
sides
that
both
members
of
the
public
who
are
affected
by
whatever
means
have
a
voice
within
a
system
at
the
same
time,
something
that
is
affecting
somewhere.
As
is
this
development.
Whatever
you
look
at
it,
it
is
a
development
and
will
have
an
outcome.
Therefore,
there
has
to
be
some
way
of
having
the
discussion
with
the
locals.
That's
what
I
think
we
should
be
trying
to
get
from
this.
J
That's
the
whole
point,
but
you've
got
a
situation
where
you
going
Reza
parks
who
pays
for
that?
The
residents
don't
and
they'll
say,
but
why
should
I
be
how
they
doing
it?
Oh
well,
that's
all
right
then,
but
it
still
has
Park
and
it's
still
a
problem
and
it's
still
the
same.
Oh
I
can't
build
a
sack
out
built
out
and
of
everything
else.
So
again,
it's
an
effect,
I'm,
not
sure.
We've,
we've
heard
a
lot
of
evidence.
It's
just
said
that
there
is
a
good
commitment
between
the
tone
to
discuss
throughout
the
parish
councils.
J
J
K
You
chair,
it's
a
quick
question
which
may
help
me
to
decide
which
way
to
vote
its
relation
to
parking
and
I
appreciate.
What's
been
said
about
not
using
the
reserved
matters
to
deal
with
various
issues.
Is
it
still
open
for
council
discussion
with
the
applicants
about
looking
at
the
cap
for
parking
on
site?
Is
this
something
that
could
still
continue
following
the
ordinary
service
that
take
place.
L
A
I'm
sure
that
those
kind
of
discussions
could
take
place
out
with
this
outside
this
application.
If
members
felt
strongly
enough
that
that
we
wanted
to
look
at
the
cap
overall,
but
I
think
the
problem
with
with
doing
that
within
this
application
is
the
cap
applies
to
the
whole
the
whole
of
the
university.
It's
far
bigger
than
this
application,
but
if
there,
if
there,
if,
if
there
was
a
will,
if
there
was
a
napping
right
to
ask
officers
to
talk
to
the
University,
it.
A
L
Sure
from
our
well
we're
more
than
willing
to
work
on
discussions
with
the
applicant
and
the
edge
of
which
I'm
sure
they'll
be
more
than
happy
to
do
through
the
process
outside
of
this
application.
We
can't
even
members
say
that
something
that
that
was
concerned
we'd,
take
it
away
and
discuss
that
with
them,
but
not
as
part
of
this
application
be
sitting
in
front
of
you
now
well.
A
A
A
I've
just
had
a
quick
word
with
the
officer
about
some
of
the
requests
for
possible
extra
conditions,
and
again
we
have
the
problem
that
some
of
the
week
you
know
we
have
the
problem
that
that
some
of
them
are
set
down.
So
my
suggestion
would
be
to
add
to
in
formatives
one
was
about
ensuring
that
the
that
there
are
appropriate
and
meaningful
discussions
with
residents
through
whatever
they
called
the
forum.
I,
don't
remember
what
it
was,
because
I
think
and
also
to
request
that
they
look.
A
The
University
looks
at
introducing
the
Knights
say
for
a
similar
scheme,
because
the
problem
with
putting
it
on
as
a
condition
is
that
the
police
are
happy
they're
happy
with
the
with
the
actual
the
building
as
it
is.
But
obviously
there
is
concerns
about
what
happens
to
those
students
when
they,
then
they
go
out,
and
it's
a
similar
problem
that
we
have
a
licensing
with
pubs.
A
A
Yeah,
yes,
the
usual
change
to
the
landscaping
to
be
the
lifetime
of
the
development
right
so
with
with,
with
the
additional
condition
the
variations
on
the
sheet
that
variation
and
the
two
in
formatives.
Are
we
ready
to
vote
or
Pradhan
opposed
that?
Second,
it,
the
second
it
counselor
Flinders
right,
all
in
favor
of
the
recommendations,
be
sure.
W
A
A
A
A
A
In
order
for
the
minutes,
counselor
colwich
came
in
and
then
went
again
because
he
declared
an
interest
last
month
as
because
he
has
an
interest
in
student
accommodation.
So
so
he
said,
we've
got
another
student
accommodation
one
on
now,
so
for
the
for
the
for
consistency
he
has.
He
has
declared
that
again
and
it
will
be
minuted,
but
I'm
not
sure
yeah
anyway.
Just
so,
you
know
why
he
came
and
when
and
for
the
minutes
has
an
interest.
A
X
Was
a
circulated,
it
just
relates
the
conditions
and
some
amendments
we've
made
and
are
quickly
room
through
those
and
the
approved
bundles
list.
There
was
a
correction
to
one
of
the
plan
references
there.
You
change
your
construction
management
plan
just
to
make
it
slightly
more
precise
and
those
who
change
the
condition
on
cycle
parking
just
to
make
it
more
flexible.
So
we
could
agree
any
changes
over
time
if
we
need
it
to
that's.
X
The
extent
of
the
updates
you've
got
the
scheme
on
the
on
the
on
the
monitor
there,
and
the
colored
up
area
shows
that
the
site
plan,
the
area
just
to
the
north,
is
where
we've
approved
a
building
of
similar
scale.
Previously,
it's
waiting
to
be
built
and
there's
an
area
trees
there
that
are
are
not
colored
in
that.
That
would
be
sort
of
interlinked
and
related
to
the
landscaping
with
the
application
site.
Leox.
The
the
anticipation
is
that
this
becomes
a
extension
of
the
student.
What
to
the
east?
X
X
A
Y
Y
A
Y
Mean
this
this
came
about
my
involvement
in
this
came
about
as
it
was
it's
the
same
sort
of
company
and
team,
and
it
will
be
the
same
occupants
of
the
adjoining
brickwork
scheme
so
that
that's
how
this
has
come
around.
So
in
terms
of
my
involvement
and
it's
been
very
much
focused
on
linking
into
the
existing
student
accommodation
scheme.
So
through
my
involvement
there
hasn't
been
that's
nuts,
not
to
say
that
you
know
there
davon
look
to
alternative
residential
options
beforehand,.
A
Was
just
going
to
ask
you
when
we
were
on
site
there
were
an
awful
lot
of
motor
factor
vans
art
on
the
pavement,
all
the
way
around
which
I
was
quite
concerned
about
actually
I.
Don't
know
whether
whether
that's
whether
you've
noticed
that
as
a
problem.
But
there
is
a
problem
and
whether,
if
we
not
as
part
of
this
development,
but
if
we
say
eyes
accounts.
H
Y
I,
don't
understand
him
as
I
understand
it.
They
are
looking
at
consolidating
their
operations,
but
what
that
means
in
terms
of,
as
you
say,
all
of
the
vans
and
everything
else,
and
not
only
operator,
don't
know
because,
as
I
understand
it,
this
car
parking
will
be
sort
of
car
car
parking
for
certain
work
as
a
style
write.
Y
A
But
I
mean
I
was
concerned
because
currently
there's
probably
not
very
many
pedestrians,
but
once
you've
got
people
you
having
both
in
the
flats
that
we've
commissioned
and
in
here
it's
gonna
be
a
lot
more
foot.
But
pedestrians
walked
about
yes
and
they
were
all
over
the
place.
Okay,
pardon
yeah,
so
it
counts
the
Richardson
and
cancel
Erdogan.
Thank.
J
You
going
back
to
the
accommodation.
Is
this
going
to
be
a
fact
where
it's,
the
units
will
be
sold
off
to
somebody,
a
private
investor
who
will
then
be
expected
to
provide
them
for
the
students?
Or
is
this
going
to
be
actually
a
student
campus
that
properly
run
by
some
organization?
That
is
not
either
students?
It's.
Y
It
is
going
to
be
operated
by
the
same
people
who
want
to
operate
the
adjoining
development,
the
brickworks,
so
it
will
be
IQ
student
accommodation
will
be
taking
on
the
operation
and
management
of
the
scheme.
Will
will
they
or
they
won't?
They
won't
own
it
its
foot.
It
will
be
affirmed
that
or
is
it
private?
Yes?
So
in
other
words,
it
goes
out
and
underwent
a
map.
Yeah
IQ
will
have
a
long
interest
as
they
have
with
the
brick.
J
Y
J
Y
Y
It's
limited
area
of
sight,
whilst
we've
got
quite
you
know
a
relatively
expansive
area
of
amenity,
space
and
landscapes
area
they
want.
The
aim
was
to
be
able
to
provide
as
much
of
that
for
actual
residents
amenity
until
the
usable
space,
rather
than
giving
it
over
to
softer
swords
and
swales,
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
that's.
What's
driven
it
right,
but
if
you've.
J
Y
N
What
gone
I
mean
it
may
be
so
the
applicant
or
two
offices
mentioned
about
the
parking
and
the
track
travel
on
paragraph
four
point:
two
seven
here
refers
to
a
travel
plan
for
the
adjoining
scheme,
which,
where
demonstrates
the
majority
of
offense.
Ninety
percent
are
traveling
by
thought
and
right.
I'm
thinking
that
it's
intended,
that
would
be
the
same
management
for
both
sites.
Would
it
be?
N
Would
it
be
possible
for
us
to
include
because
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
condition
about
a
travel
plan
for
it,
whether
it
to
be
a
travel
plan
that
covers
both
forward
travel
arrangements
for
this
site
to
be
incorporated
within
the
travel
plan
for
the
existing
site,
just
assume
that
it
was
going
to
be
some
interchange
between
the
two
facilities?
And
the
second
point
is
given
that
this
application
includes
parking
for
eight
vehicles.
N
Can
we
condition
that
whether
he's
benefiting
from
that
parking
has
their
own
travel
plan
so
that
we
can
be
reassured
that
it
is
actually
being
used
to
maximum
efficiency
in
terms
of
parking
available?
Given
what
has
been
said
about
the
situation,
we
saw
on
the
site
visit
with
a
lot
of
the
company's
vehicles
being
parked
on
the
street,
presumably
because
there's
not
enough
space
in
the
existing
layout.
N
N
Y
Don't
think
well,
we
aren't
in
a
position
and
through
this
we
won't
be
able
to
impose
travel
or
travel
plan
and
restrictions
on
on
your
boat
factors,
and
you
know,
as
I
said,
to
the
best
of
my
understanding
that
date
now
looking
at
consolidating
so
actually
reducing
in
scale
their
operational
time
here
and
hence
why
there's
absolutely
reduction
in
their
car
parking
from
what
they've
got
at
the
moment
on
its
sides
of
the
eight
spaces.
So
they
they
would
probably
argue
that
in
travel
planning
terms
that
they're
doing
their
bit.
H
H
J
Mean
the
point
this
is
where
there
are
always
issues
when
you
bring
in
accommodation
into
what
is
an
industrial
area.
I
know
that
area.
Well,
those
fans
are
actually
bands
of
trouble.
Look
across
the
whole
of
the
county,
all
orbits.
They
have
to
come
at
certain
point
to
transfer
over
there
good
to
then
go
on.
If
we
start
interfering
with
businesses,
they'll
be
our
business.
The
electrical
company
where
it
says
Burt
will
be
our
business
because
they
have
balance
down
there.
This
is
where
and
the
glass
people
at
the
top
look.
A
F
Y
Yeah
I'm,
not
in
a
position
on
behalf
of
IQ
Thank
You
aunt,
my
compliant
to
confirm
what
they
will
I
won't
be
doing.
I.
Think
I,
don't
know,
I'm,
not
aware
that
there
were
any
particular
bun
issues
with
this
original
scheme.
In
that
sense,
but
again
I
wasn't
directly
involved
in
it.
That's
anecdotal!
F
W
F
Usual
way
that
works,
then
is
the
advert
goes
on.
Somebody
then
reports
it.
The
enforcement
action
takes
months
then
precipitates
into
a
planning
application,
by
which
time
there
yeah,
but
still
up
there.
It
may
then
be
refused.
May
then
be
appealed,
sounds
very
familiar
with
the
Piccadilly
issue,
but
you
see
how
it
works.
I.
A
P
M
Those
that
went
on
site
yesterday
were
quite
happy
about
this.
It's
not
why
Emma
might
call
a
beauty
spot
of
York
and
so
I'm
going
to
move
the
offices
recommendation
chair
when
people
talk
about
travel
plans
each
as
they
say
in
West.
Yorkshire
he's
never
to
split
away
from
the
college
from
the
University
and
I
can't
see
anybody
having
cars
and
big
vehicles
travelling
backwards
and
forwards
cos
there's
nowhere
to
park
when
they
get
to
the
other
end.
So
I've
great
pleasure
in
moving
the
officers
recommendation.
Sure,
okay,.
N
It
was
a
question
that
followed
on
from
the
question
officers
to
the
point
about
the
conditions.
Can
we
add
a
condition
about
the
travel
plan
being
part
of
of
that
for
the
wider
site,
so
they
obviously
be
incorporated
we've
before
the
operator,
whether
the
operates
is
to
have
a
travel
plan,
and
secondly,
can
we
condition
that
use
of
these
parking
spaces,
which
we
are
told,
is
a
requirement
of
the
current
site
operates
a
committee?
X
X
So
we
didn't
see
it
necessary
to
one
on
this
site
as
well,
when
all
the
evidence
suggests
that
were
in
the
targets
in
any
event,
so
I
wouldn't
achieve
that
much,
but
we
can
do
there's
no
reason
why
we
can't
and
the
other
in
terms
of
looking
at
the
issue
of
the
existing
premises.
It's
not
not
really
within
the
remit
of
this
because
he's
not
related
to
this
development
itself.
It's
it's
an
existing
building
somewhere
else,
though.
X
N
N
A
A
M
A
W
A
H
A
L
A
No
landscaping
there's
no
landscaping
on
this
one,
so
we're
all
right.
Second,
it
any
questions.
Comments
register
vote,
all
those
in
favor,
please
show
any
against
I.
Think
that's
approved.
Oh
sorry,
did
you
once,
but
in
future
not
win
these
in
future
because
of
the
changes
we
made
at
Council
last
week,
small
applications
like
this
in
the
Greenbelt
will
only
will
be
officer
approved
unless
it
right.