►
From YouTube: Staffing Matters & Urgency Committee, 1 April 2019
Description
AGENDA
1. Declarations of Interest
2. Exclusion of Press and Public
3. Minutes
4. Public Participation
5. Pension or Exit Discretion(Press & public excluded)
6. Redundancy (Press & public excluded)
7. Complaint Investigation (Press & public excluded)
8. Urgent Business
For full agenda, attendance details and supporting documents visit:
https://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=120&MId=11294
A
B
If
those
statements
are
true-
and
there
is
no
defamation,
stop
defamatory
and
what
I'm
about
to
say
next
people,
the
truth,
they're
filming
me
into
the
stage
he
meeting
of
the
22nd
of
February
I
asked
the
chief
executive,
who
was
president
meeting
five
questions
of
clarification
about
that
meeting
and
many
workers.
Many
people
copy
to
know.
That's
a
basic
response.
The
jeep
negatives
adventures
once
on
the
fifth
of
May
was
I.
C
C
B
Your
accusations
regarding
my
professional
integrity
and
consider
these
at
million
comments
to
be
defamatory.
Bearing
in
mind,
ask
questions.
I've
managed
to
be
astounding.
Coming
from
the
chief
executive
and
presumably
following
legal
advice.
She
then
we
got
to
say
he
will
get
to
be
engaged
in
a
prolonged
and
sustained
personal
attack
on
the
integrity
of
officers
and
I
am
not
prepared
to
tolerate
this
any
longer.
I
am
therefore
seeking
independent
legal
advice
on
the
actions.
The
counsel
can
take
the
protective
staff
from
unwarranted
accusations.
B
These
are
serious
statements
to
make
about
me
by
the
head
of
the
Council,
backed
up
by
the
legal
department,
so
it
took
them
very
seriously
and
waited
for
my
day
in
court.
It
took
months
chasing
to
find
and
receive
the
message
that
no
further
action
was
to
be
taken.
There
was
no
apology
for
making
these
baseless
threats
and,
of
course,
still
there
was
to
the
original
questions.
These
actions
by
the
genes
significant
caught
me
and
my
family
message
stress
and
cost
in
2000.
B
What
I
had
done
that
the
soda
family
that
had
injured
their
professional
integrity?
It's
also
wasted
countless
hours
of
staff
and
counselors
time
in
having
to
read
my
letters
and
to
deal
with
a
formal
complaint
which
is
also
taking
but
still
concluded,
holding
hypothesis
quite
a
professional
knowledge
and
ethic
which
does
not
allow
you
to
go
around
threatening
people
with
legal
action
where
they
ask
questions
you
may
not
like.
Nevertheless,
when
you
make
a
mistake,
you
apologize
and
a
small
in
the
end
of
it,
the
chief
not
once
apologized.
B
So
that
is
why
we
are
here
again
wasting
the
more
counsel
time.
The
very
it
is
your
job
with
respect
to
ensure
the
poor
judgments
and
the
consequent
contact
that
I
have
just
described.
It's
not
allowed
to
happen
in
the
first
place
and
to
ensure
that
if
it
does
that
complaints,
the
thoroughly
investigated
with
proper
communication
back
to
the
complainants
actions,
they
ensure
this
never
happens
again.
If
an
apology
is
required,
then
that
is
given.
This
will
probably
not
be
the
last
complaint
about
senior
officers
that
he
will
have
to
deal
with.
So
let's
get.
A
D
Considering
entirely
of
complaints
against
chief
officer
conduct
to
date,
I'm
glad
formalin
member
in
volunteer
and
refreshing.
In
fact,
when
I
say
revolutionary
change,
whilst
I
recognize
that
complaints
by
countless
against
Chief
and
especially
statutory
officers,
should
be
prioritized
over
citizen
complaints
and.
B
D
Is
the
worst
in
terms
of
delay?
I
can
see
that
reflects
us
being
apart
after
mr.
Hummel
that
committees,
before
the
threats
of
defamation,
made
quite
a
head
of
pay
service
to
him
out
to
me.
This
was
very
very
good
months
ago
and
he's
shocking
that,
after
multiple
attempts
by
him,
this
case
has
yet
to
be
presented
to
huge
is
almost
to
the
citizens
were
expected
to
give
up
now,
I
inserted
to
the
serious,
complicated
interest
complaint
against
the
same
officer.
Only
after
13
days,
three
reminders
and
two
interventions,
I
will
close.
D
The
gillies
was
I
even
presented
with
mythology.
I
hate,
my
complaint
disability,
the
same
as
his
promise
I
appreciate
that
little
can
be
done
in
terms
of
process
with
the
next
administration.
At
that
time,
accounts
of
wrangling
leads
to
self
sustained
and
she
officer
investigations
and
disciplinary
committee.
Many.
D
Difficulties
of
leading
members
having
to
directly
address
conduct
matters
of
their
closest
advisors
protocols
had
been
in
place.
We
could
have
saved
ourselves,
I
save
millions
of
pounds
and
loss
of
reputation.
Chief
officers
should
have
be
brought
to
book
all
the
ground.
A
party
outraged
the
language
fiasco,
the
expensive
is
learning
of
propagates
and
the
public
interest
with
what's
wrong
during
all
these
inherited
problems
will
be
asked
to
make
the
regime
more
recently.
We
have
more
insidious
order
in
governance,
2017
and
18
and
standard
sportscasters,
where.