►
From YouTube: Cloud Custodian Community Meeting 2023-05-02
Description
Our community meeting is public and we encourage users and contributors of Cloud Custodian to attend! You can find the notes for this meeting on our github repo: https://github.com/orgs/cloud-custodian/discussions
Check out our Slack for more info! http://slack.cloudcustodian.io
A
A
So,
hey
everybody
officially
welcome
to
the
May
2nd
community
meeting
for
South
custodian
hello,
these.
If
anyone
if
it's
anyone's
first
meeting
or
if
it's
been
a
while
since
you
joined
in
you,
can
jump
in
and
say
hello
do
some
intros
before
we
get
started,
we
should
say
we
are
subject
to
the
cncf
code
of
conduct
which,
in
honor
of
George
just
be
excellent
to
each
other,
is
the
the
name
of
the
game
there?
Does
anyone
want
to
jump
in
with
some
intros.
B
A
C
A
All
right,
so
what
we've
got
in
the
meeting
link
here,
I
will
put
the
you
know:
I
usually
put
the
meeting
Link
in
the
chat,
put
it
in
here,
so
that
it
gets
so
that
it
gets
into
our
recording.
Here.
We've
got
a
weekly
report
here.
This
is
just
what's
been
going
on
issues
and
PR's
open
and
closed.
Since
last
time
we
got
together.
A
D
D
D
It's
mostly
just
like
a
review
on
PRS
and
some
of
the
things
that
we've
had
done.
I've
done
a
lot
of
work
in
release
engineering,
new
providers
and
C7
left
and
intensive
Cloud
and
wrote
that,
on
some
of
the
things
with
regards
to
doing
preventative
controls
for
what
cloudformation
hooks
for
AWS
and
slowing.
D
A
Thanks
I,
don't
see
any
so
if
anybody
sees
a
other
than
other
than
that
stuff
is
there?
Is
there
any
particular
issues
or
PR's
that
seem
particularly
interesting
to
folks
or
you
have
questions
about
them?
Feel
free
to
stay
at
the
mop,
feel
free
to
jump
in
or
you
all
should
be
able
to
to
reference
specific
issues
here,
and
we
can
talk
about
it
more.
Otherwise,
we
can
go
to
the
one
that
Ryan
was
asking
about,
which
I
guess
sounds
like
you
already
took.
A
look
at
it.
A
B
D
There's
like
a
technique
as
well
for
like
if
I,
don't
know
how
many
parameters
there
are,
but
there's
like
50
parameters
and
then
they
potentially
change.
We
do
this
thing
where
we
like,
let
like
basically
pass
them
like
a
Json
arbitrary
map,
but
we
use
the
sdks
shape
to
validate
I'll,
see
if
I
can
find
an
example.
I,
don't
know
how
many
parameters
there
are
there's
only
like
a
couple,
then
you
know
you
just
enumerate
them
in
the
schema,
but
I.
F
E
A
A
A
F
Aj
I
will
jump
in.
My
name
is
Sonia
Guardian
I.
This
is
the
first
meeting
I
attend,
so
I've
been
using
custodian
for
I
guess
almost
three
years
you
participate
sometimes
on
this
lack
conversation
being
annoying
to
you
guys,
but
so
not
know
what
to
expect
I'm
here,
Make
Me
Maybe
entertain.
Let's
see.
A
A
A
Welcome
if
you're
not
sure
how
to
get
to
the
point
where
you
can
submit
a
doc
PR
asking
in
slack
and
saying
I'd
like
to
contribute
a
doc
update
is
probably
the
easiest
way
to
get
some
help,
because
making
the
docs
better
is
happy
time
for
everybody
and
the
questions
that
feed
into
those
stock
updates
are
great
too
and
Sonia.
Thanks
for
your
your
help,
because
I
know,
you've
asked
questions
but
also
answered
plenty.
E
It
was
kind
of
meaning
to
ask
you
how
to
go
about
the
test
case
on
that,
because
the
test
would
have
to
be
pulling
data
from
cash.
I
saw
there
was
a
setting
that
said,
cash
is
true
that
I
think
might
be
worth
taking
a
look
at,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
to
add
a
test
that
would
look
up
things
from
the
cache
itself
to
fill.
A
A
B
A
Okay
but
yeah
we
will
I'll
try.
So
if
I
get
a
I,
try
to
get
a
failing
test
or
get
a
test
committed
for
that
one
that
would
have
reproduced
the
issue
without
the
change.
Maybe
that's
a
good
start
and
then
hopefully,
with
this
change,
it
fixes
it
but
in
your
environment,
is
this
thing
working
now
as
is
or
are
you
still
running
some
running
some
tests.
D
B
D
I
think
what
we
want
to
do
is
just
pass
in
like
pass
through
on
the
dash
R
region
flag
to
gcp
and
then
speaking
with
the
Alias
on
all
what
that's
going
to
mean
for
existing
resources
that
are
that
are,
is
a
little
bit
unclear.
So
I
think
most
of
them
will
be
fine
like
it
will
have
compatibility
like
if
questions
is.
D
And
you
don't
pass
over
again:
we
changes
to
Magic
on
an
existing
one
that
was
treated
as
Global
and
we
switched
to
Regional.
How
does
that
affect
Banks?
And
it's
still
not
100
clear
but
effectively?
We're
gonna
have
to
document
it,
and
maybe
we
use
this
opportunity
to
earn
against
the
docs.
We
saw
the
gcp
provider
labels
beta,
so
we
can
also
use
this
to
help
debate
label
as
we
do
this
change.
That
was
the
only
thing
that
sort
of
came
up
as
as
significant
behind.
A
E
A
D
D
A
E
A
E
A
E
A
D
D
Currently
it's
like
a
it's
wired
in
its
Global
effective
way,
so
it'd
be
nice
to
the
these
instruments
were
able
to
customize
it
on
the
provided
basis,
so
we're
not
leaking
in
to
other
providers
that
that's
actually
been
an
issue
somewhat.
Recently,
in
the
last
few
months
we've
had
we've
been
picking
up
photo
dependencies,
especially
for
the
other
providers,
and
we
want
to
try
to
turn
down
on
that.
The
actual
term
down
on
the
plan
is
actually
it's
going
to
be.
A
D
As
questions
like
how
to
what's
the
wiring
you
look
like,
is
it
could
it
be
like?
Do
we
let
the
providers
like
poke
the
type
as
they
get
registered,
to
sort
of
like
inject?
That
type
of
thing
might
be
the
easiest
way
to
do
it
and
yeah
right
now,
it's
hard
coded
into
the
base
registry,
if
I
want
to
correctly
so
yeah
mechanics.
A
A
Anything
else-
oh
I,
did
have
a
question
for
the
group
about
sort
of
related
to
this
now
thing
do.
Does
anyone
on
this
call
use
now
as
a
tag
value
to
in
real-time
policies?
You
do
you
do
production,
okay,
yeah,
just
to
show
like
a
last
modified
or
something
like
that.
So
do
you
you
use
those
you
run
those
out
of
like
cloudtrail
mode
or
something
yep,
okay,
you're
running
out
of
cloudtrail
mode
and
where
you
set
the
the
now
do
you
have
just
the
the
curly
braces
now?
A
E
A
That's
I
I
was
curious
if
people
have
been
sort
of
organically
coming
across
that
I
know.
It's
come
up
in
a
couple
issues
or
discussions
too
that
if
you
have
a
Lambda,
Mode
Policy
and
you
have
that
now
it's
getting
interpolated
when
you
provision
so
it
would.
It
would
be
kind
of
like
populating
with
your
your
provision
time
instead
of
the
runtime
yeah.
A
E
C
A
Didn't
know
so,
if
there
was,
would
there
ever
be
a
time
that
you
or
anyone
else
on
this
call
can
imagine
actually
wanting
the
existing
Behavior,
where
the
the
single
brace
interpolates
like
the
the
provision
time
of
the
function?
Can
you
think
of
a
time
when
you
would
want
that
or
you
pretty
much
if
you're
doing
it,
you
always
want
that
run
time.
A
C
A
A
A
I
think
so
I
would
be
curious
to
see
if
the
the
pr
as
it
stands
right
now
works
in
your
environment
and
actually
and
and
avoids
the
issue
that
you
were
running
into
yep
and
I'm
also
going
to
try
to
get
a
test
in
that
uses.
It
in
memory
cache
to
to
kind
of
recreate
the
issue
that
you
were
seeing
without
the
change
and
hopefully
fix
it
with
the
change
just
to
confirm
that
it's
doing
what
we
think
it's
doing.
A
E
A
D
D
A
D
Like
I
think,
the
fix
up
got
originally
proposed,
for
this
was
trying
to
fix
it
and
specific
to
RDS,
but
it
might
be
better
for
us
to
try
to
fix
it
lower
lower
down
inside
of
query.py
like
if
we
get.
If
we
know
it's
a
scalar
Service
app
filter
that
we
just
and
we
haven't
explosive
identities
that
we
just
looked
through
them.