►
From YouTube: Cloud Custodian Community Meeting 20220315
Description
Our community meeting is public and we encourage users and contributors of Cloud Custodian to attend! You can find the notes for this meeting on our github repo: https://github.com/cloud-custodian/community/discussions
To get an invite to the meeting join the google group and you'll receive one via email: https://groups.google.com/g/cloud-custodian
A
All
right
welcome
everybody.
It
is
march
15th,
and
this
is
the
bi-weekly
cloud
custodian
community
meeting.
This
is
where
we
have
our
high
bandwidth
discussions
with
an
open
and
semi-structured
agenda,
so
we
can
cover
some
of
the
stuff
that
everyone's
working
on
and
get
to
share
tips
and
tricks.
A
So
with
that,
please
keep
in
mind
that
we
do
record
and
publish
these
on
youtube
and,
as
always,
the
cncf
code
of
conduct
is
in
effect.
I
have
the
notes.
Url
in
chat
feel
free
to
dive
in
there.
It's
just
a
markdown
document.
If
you
want
to
add
stuff
at
the
bottom,
the
agenda
and
we
haven't-
and
we
have
time
we
will
cover
it
with
that-
let's
get
started
with
some
of
the
basics
here.
First,
is
we
have
cloud
custodian
102,
which
is
happening
march
16th?
That
is
tomorrow,
click.
B
Coming
together,
no,
it's
gonna
be
good
yeah,
it's
gonna
be
really
good.
In
this
webinar
session
we
will
be
covering
c7n
mailer
in
c7
and
org.
B
It's
not
a
workshop,
so
it's
not
hands-on,
but
we'll
be
going
over
how
to
what
the
tools
are,
what
you
need
to
make
them
work,
what
the
configuration
files
for
them
look
like
what
they
look
like
in
a
policy
config
file,
that's
specific
to
notify
and
c7n
mailer,
and
then
I
will
be
demoing
how
to
use
them.
So
I'm
not
gonna,
say
I'm
still
working
on
the
slides.
C
B
No,
unfortunately,
I
am
at
the
moment,
still
most
proficient
in
aws,
and
since
this
is
the
first
time
I'm
going
to
be
doing
this,
I'm
going
to
be
doing
it
in
with
aws,
and
I
know
that
once
you
start
getting
into
azure,
it
starts
getting
a
little
bit
more
specialized.
B
However,
I
am
we
are
planning
on
supporting
that
in
the
webinars.
It's
also
a
matter
of
me
learning
more
azure
and
spending
more
time
in
there,
so
that
I
feel
confident
than
teaching
should
we
see.
B
Would
also
learn
a
lot
from
him
too
yeah,
because
I
know
that's
and
jameson
and
aj
correct
me
if
I
am
mistaken,
but
as
I
understand
it,
when
it
comes
to
both
mailer
and
c7n
org,
it
gets
a
little
bit
more
specialized
right
when
you're
using
azure.
E
A
little
bit
yeah,
it's
a
little
bit
different
with
how
you
provide
credentials
for
azure
to
authenticate
to
your
different
accounts
in
c7
and
org,
and
the
mailer
setup
is
definitely
different.
B
A
B
Yeah,
no
thanks
for
making
that
point
like
we
definitely
hear
that
and
you're
not
the
first
to
ask
and
what
we'd
also
like
to
start
doing.
B
What
I've
been
trying
to
do
is
kind
of
create
templates
for
these
webinars
too,
and
pushing
them
up
to
a
public
repo,
so
that
the
idea
is
that
eventually,
like
members
of
the
community,
can
also
start
teaching
each
other
so
that
this
becomes
more
of
a
community
resource
that
so
that'd
be
my
hope,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
other
open
source
communities,
kind
of
do
same
things
where
there's
like
community
ambassadors.
B
So
that's
my
hope
with
that,
so
that
we
can
all
like
lift
each
other
up.
So
I'm
also
working
toward
that
like
a
more
sustainable
model
for
how
we
can
teach
each
other
but
yeah.
Thanks
for
that.
A
All
right,
I
will,
I
will
get
back
to
you
o'keefe
on
that
one.
Thank
you,
because
I'd
be
very
interested
in
that
as
well.
Moving
on
pycon
sprint,
we
are
planning
on
a
few
of
us,
are
planning
on
attending
pycon.
That's
in
salt
lake
city,
in
the
u.s
april,
27th
through
may
3rd,
and
that
weekend
we're
hoping
to
run
a
hack
sprint,
basically
just
grab
a
room,
a
bunch
of
laptops
get
in
there
and
get
some
work
done.
A
So,
if
you're
attending,
please
contact
me
and
we'd
love
to
hang
out,
hang
out
with
you
and
lastly,
before
we
get
on
to
the
other
stuff,
our
first,
this
monthly
cloud
custodian
newsletter
is
out.
This
is
everything.
That's
happened
in
february,
highlighting
some
of
the
work
that
a
lot
of
you
in
this
call
have
been
doing
if
you've
been
coming
to.
These
calls
is
basically
a
summary
of
all
the
at
that
month's
calls.
A
So
if
you're
looking
for
a
higher
level
thing-
and
maybe
you
can
attend
all
the
meetings
and
the
the
kind
of
show
notes
that
we're
taking
or
a
little
bit
too
much
for
you-
you
can
subscribe
to
this
on
the
on
the
saclet
site
and
you'll
get
this
in
your
inbox
here
below
so
good
stuff.
Thanks
to
everyone
for
all
the
work
they've
been
doing,
it
makes
generating
that
content
easy
all
right
pr
and
issue
so
that
that
kind
of
handles
the
the
formal
agenda
items.
A
F
Sure
yeah
hi
good
afternoon,
everyone.
So
in
the
last
community
meeting
I
had
a
question.
This
is
regarding
one
of
the
policy
which
we
wanted
to
create
to
check
if
the
ec2
lies
within
the
subnet
and
couple
gives
gave
us
some
useful
links
and
we
were
able
to
create
the
policy
and
it
worked
successfully.
Thanks
to
you
guys,
one
small
thing
which
came
up
is
while
comparing
the
tags
for
ec2
and
subnet,
we
got
to
know
that
the
ec2
instance
has
a
tag
name
application,
whereas
the
subnet
has
the
tag
name,
application
ci.
G
Okay
yeah,
so
we
we
did
have
a
question
in
getter
about
this
and-
and
I
would
say,
good
question
because
a
lot
of
times
we
are
looking
we're
using
regex
to
match
values
rather
than
keys
and
the
keys.
Are
we
typically
assume
they're
going
to
be
consistent,
even
though
they're
sometimes
not?
I
put
a
couple
ideas
in
getter
and
tried
to
be
honest
that
I
have
not
tested
them.
It
was
one
of
those
this
this
should
work
worth
a
shot.
G
I
I
would
need
time
because
I
don't
know
how
to
how
to
do
that,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
question.
I
think
it's
something
that
we
can
follow
up
if
you're
in
getter
also
mentorship,
we
could
try
to
to
go
through
it
together
and
if
it's
not
possible,
get
an
issue
filed
and
if
it
is
possible,
but
awkward
then
note
for
future
improvement,
but
at
least
we
we
get
you
rolling
in
the
short
term.
F
Yeah,
I'm
also
in
that
getter
I'll
just
reply
to
that
question
and
yeah.
The
thing
is
right:
now
all
the
instances
have
been
marked
as
non-compliant
because
of
the
tags,
unmatching
inconsistent
tags,
so
we
could
do
it
programmatically.
G
Great
yeah,
I
think
I
saw
another
question
come
in
on
that
that
I
haven't
gotten
back
to
because
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
possible,
which
is,
he
was
talking
about
case,
insensitive
matches
for
that,
and
I
think
we
had
to
piece
things
together.
Yeah.
I
guess
let's
take
it
to
the
getter
thread
and
I'll
link,
george
I'll,
find
that
get
her
thread
and
link
it
from
the
notes
so
that
we
can.
We
can
all
jump
over
there.
Whoever's
interested.
A
Regex
rules
are
the
same
in
the
documentation.
Is
it
you
day,
1921
yeah.
F
Yeah
this
one,
that's
it
and
also
in
the
last
community
meeting.
I
brought
up
a
question
regarding
the
c7
and
mailer
that
also
from
the
solutions
you
all
provided.
We
were
able
to
find
out
the
issue
and
now
I'm
able
to
send
emails
to
the
correct
audience.
But
I'm
hoping
that
tomorrow
session
would
be
more
helpful
and
we
would
like
to
get
some
more
new
things
so
that
we
can
make
a
make
that
code
more
effective.
A
A
Similar
to
the
azure
question:
if
how
many
are
there,
is
there
like
one
or
two
of
you
or
cause
it?
Might?
It
might
make
sense
for
us
just
to
grab
like
your
three
or
four
people
put
something
on
the
calendar
and
then
just
have
you,
pepper,
pepper,
aj,
with
all
the
questions
at
once
aj,
that
was
a
theoretical,
I'm
not
saying
it
would
be.
You.
B
A
F
You
actually,
we
are
using
custodian
to
provide
the
security
framework
for
all
the
instances.
Sorry
for
all
the
aws
services.
As
of
now
so
picking
up,
rds
now
shifted
to
ec2
soon
we'll
be
moving
on
to
s3.
So
yeah
you'll
see
my
face,
and
probably
all
the
meetings
over
here.
A
No
worries
akief,
it's
your
turn.
C
Yes,
so
this
is
everything
about
the
azure
pace,
so
we
deployed
the
policy
back
in
march
2021
and
with
the
help
of
stefan
gordon,
I
think
he
helped
me.
You
know
with
all
the
instructions
and
stuff
and
and
I
was
able
to
successfully
deploy,
the
policy
was
working
fine,
but
the
output
that
we
get
from
the
student
is
in
the
gz
file
and
the
you
know
we
inject
the
logs
into
the
same
solution
and
the
sim
doesn't
consume
the
gz
file.
So
we
wrote
another
function
to
convert.
C
Gz
to
you
know
the
consumable
version,
so
that
all
makes
you
know
us
to
change
the
output
directory.
You
know
where
the
custodian
is
is
storing
the
data,
so
I
modified
the
existing
policy
with
with
just
the
output.
You
know,
output,
directory
structure
and
and
everything
stopped.
You
know
working
and
I
did
some
kind
of
a
troubleshooting.
You
know
back
and
forth.
C
I
changed
few
things
and
see,
but
then
what
I'm
observing
is
whenever
I
deploy
things
in
the
debug,
it
shows
me
everything
is
getting
in
the
in
the
azure,
but
when
I
actually
go
in
the
function
and
I
see
the
function,
there
is
no
code
over
there
and
I'm
making
this
policy
run
every
five
minutes.
You
know
that
custodian
runs
and
throws
something
out,
but
it
isn't
doing
anything
so
I
have
created
the
the
github
issue
also
that
7160
and
I
also
posted
in
the
community.
C
You
know,
like
you
know
this
is
like
we
want
to
solve
this
thing
and
I
need
the
help
from
the
community.
You
know
is
this
something
with
the
new
version.
You
know
that
something
went
wrong
or
is
it
something
just
for
me.
G
C
Yes,
so
when
I
initially
did
in
march
2021
that
was
version
0.9.11
and
it
worked
at
that
time,
but
the
when
I
modified
the
output
directly
under
the
execution
options.
When
I
did
this
change,
I
had
the
new
version
of
the
custodian
that
is
9
15.
I
think,
with
this
version
when
I
deploy
you
can
see
in
the
in
the
debug
messages.
Everything
looks
good,
you
know,
but
I
don't
see
the
actual
code
going
into
the
function
and
running
you
know.
C
A
And
you're
in
the
gear:
okay,
so
carol's
like
yeah
sorry,
I
didn't
have
time
last
week,
I'll
check
it
out
now
and
and
you're
already
in
the
getter.
Then
right!
Yes,
sorry!
I
know
I
just
asked
you
that.
A
I
got
a
bunch
of
slack
windows
open
but
looks
like
like
carol's
gonna,
take
a
look,
and
hopefully
that
that
will
work.
Okay
sounds
good.
That's
all!
I
have
all
right
awesome.
Any
other
questions
before
we
move
on.
H
H
We,
I
have
helped
him
clean
it
up
a
little
bit,
but
just
want
to
make
sure
that
what
we're
doing
here
is
it's
not
something
that's
already
supported,
and
we
just
don't
know
about
it
or
not,
but
the
idea
here
is
we
need
to
be
able
to,
I
guess,
filter
on
cider
but
being
able
to
pass
in
a
list
of
ciders
that
we
want
to
match
rather
than
just
one
single
cider.
H
I
think,
if
you
look
at
the
description,
I
think
it's
best
described
with
the
policy
example
that
we're
trying
to
do
here
right
so
right
now,
the
first
policy
we
can
do
right
now
right.
We
can
check
that
hey.
Is
this
a
security
group?
Does
it
have
an
ingress
rule
that
is
not
in
this
cider
right
now
that
is
supported,
but
for
our
use
case
we
have
a
list
of
siters
that
we
want
to
filter
on.
H
So
I
guess
the
first
question
is,
you
know:
is
this
something
that's
already
supported?
If
not-
and
you
know,
then
this
pr
won't
make
sense.
Otherwise
you
know
this
appear
wouldn't
make
sense.
H
I
Mean
if
so,
if
someone
adds
10
dot
like
you
know,
10.10.10.
I
32.,
it's
it's
allowed
right
and
it's
not.
H
It's
not
just
doing
string
string
match
if
it's
one
cider
it
actually
do
cited.
The
correct
side
verification
check
is,
is
only
do
the
string
check
once
we
start
doing
a
list
here
because
it
doesn't
understand
cider.
I
guess
a
list
of
ciders.
E
I
think
I
need
to
double
check,
but
I
believe
I
did
a
regex
of
ciders
in
the
past.
I
That
we
tried
as
well
that
that
it's
not
you
know
we
if
regex
is
not
going
to
work.
As
you
know,
the
insider
operations
works
slightly
differently.
So,
as
you
see
the
code
in
our
pr
change
the
changing
code,
it
will
support
you
know.
Just
a
few
lines
of
code
will
support
cider
match
if
no
it's
a
subset
of
smaller
sliders,
then
it'll
match
and
then
delete
or
whatever
action.
G
Yeah
I
mean
this
one
seems
reasonable
to
me.
I
would
want
to
go,
take
a
look
at
it
and
run
through
your
test
cases,
but
that
sounds
right
and
I
think
darren.
What
you
were
getting
at
too
is
that
if
we,
if
we
have
a
single
sider-
and
it's
not
it's
not
a
one
item
array,
but
if
it's
a
single
cell
there's
a
string,
then
it
does
that
network
in
check
the
way
you'd.
H
G
G
Yeah,
but
with
the
with
the
array,
then
it's
then
it's
gonna.
Do
it's
not
gonna.
Do
the
right
match
yeah.
H
With
the
array
it
will
try
to
see
if
the
if
the
the
ip
is
one
of
the
member
of
the
list,
rather
than.
E
G
Yep
right
on
you
got
it
so
yeah.
So
I
think
this
is.
This
is
good.
Sorry
for
letting
us
hang
out
without
a
response
so
long,
but
we'll
have
to
yeah
yeah.
A
That
was
the
note
written
there
when
I
brought
it
up
to
kapil.
He
was
like,
I
totally
totally
missed
this
one,
so
let
him
know
I'm
going
to
take
a
look
at
it
so
that
I
was
hoping
he'd
be
here
today,
but
he's
not
so
I
I
will
try
to
get
you
like
an
actual
comment
from
him
in
here.
G
G
To
put
so
many
together
to
cover
all
the
all
the
cases
so.
A
A
Can
you
take
an
item
to
just
leave
a
comment
there?
Yes
yeah.
A
I
I've
noticed
that
it's
it's
best
to
always
leave
a
comment
because
then
we
forgot
to
come,
go
back
and
leave
a
comment
and
then
we
do
it
again
all
right
anything
else.
On
this
one.
I
H
I
think
two
or
three
of
them
actually
have
been
merged.
I
would
say
the
next
one
really,
the
next
big
one
is
the
manage
config
rule,
one,
that's
the
one
that
has
been
out
there
for
a
while,
too
again
just
waiting
for,
I
guess,
response
from
kapil.
H
We
have
several
conversation
on
this
and
I
believe
we
came
to
an
agreement
on
how
it
should
be
implemented.
So
I
have
updated
the
code
to
to
do
what
kapil
said
that,
how
it
should
be
so
just
waiting
for
for
kpo
or
whoever
else
can
actually
review
it.
Now.
A
A
H
I
would
say
is
a
big
one.
We
have
quite
a
few
policies
right
now
that
use
manage
config
rule
so
having
this
merge
in.
H
Version
here
that
will
help
us
with
our
migrations
over
to
using
the
upstream
version
of
clock,
australian
here
and
then
the
rest,
I
think
just
waiting
for
pr,
but
not
not
to
yeah.
H
Just
those
two
pr,
I
would
say
higher
priority
and
then
for
the
issue,
one
that
this
one
is
of
of
interest
here.
H
H
In
getter
didn't
get
any
response
trying
to
search
and
look
for.
You
know
different
people
see
if
anyone
has
tried
to
have
tried
to
do
this
before.
I
don't
think
anyone.
H
To
do
this
before,
but
high
summary
is
a
high
level
summary
is
trying
to
deploy
a
gcp
policy
but
from
aws
environment
and
the
idea
is,
you
know
we
are
a
shopping
into
it
and
sure
we
want
to
have
different
policies
for
different
cloud
providers
and
but.
G
H
To
deploy
it
from
a
single
place
right
in
our
case,
aws
is
our
main,
where
our
main
workload
runs.
So
we
have
set
up
what
is
called
workload:
identity
federation,
which
is
a
feature
in
gcp
that
allows
you
to.
I
guess:
exchange
aws
credential
for
gcp
credential.
H
H
Right
then,
unable
to
acquire
impressive
potential
blah
blah
blah.
I've
opened
a
support
ticket
on
the
tcp
side
to
dig
deeper
into
this,
but
I
believe
the
the
root
of
the
issue
is
the
this
one
api
call
that
is
made
to
gcp
this
one
right
here
post.
If
you
this
one.
H
If
that
thing
is
not
there,
then
it
works
fine
and
that
header
is
set
because
of
this
line
right
here
in
client.py
of
custodian.
H
So
I
verify
that
if
I
take
out
the
quota
project
id,
if
I
don't
set
the
quota
project
id
everything
works.
Fine,
I
need
to
I'm
still
waiting
for
confirmation
from
the
gcp
side
that
we
should
not
be
setting
that
header
we're
making
that
gen
access.
Token.
H
I
think
api
call,
so
I'm
waiting
for
them
to
hear
back
from
them,
but
I
believe
that
is
the
root
of
the
issue
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
because
we're
trying
to
get
the
credentials
so
so
you
cannot
really
set
the
the
quota
project
id.
Yet
that
is
something
that
you
set
when
you
make
the
actual
api
call
after
you
have
been
authenticated.
H
H
Whether
it's
the
right
that
we
should
not
be
sending
that
that
the
header
got
you
and
right
now
we
are
sending
the
header
because
of
our
code.
In
our
code,
you
see
how
the
google.default
it.
E
H
Called
a
project
id,
it
works
fine
for
other
setup,
but
for
the
setup
where
we're
doing
it
from
aws.
A
H
If
so,
if
they
confirm
that,
hey,
when
you're
trying
to
make
the
the
api
call
to
get
the
token
you
we
should
not
be
setting
the
header,
then
we
have
to
figure
out
how,
in
our
code,
to
determine
that
hey
we're
doing
this
special
case
for
aws
right
here.
Right,
yeah.
A
A
A
All
right,
I
will
make
a
note
of
that,
then
in
the
notes,
any
any
of
these
other
things
jumping
out
at
anybody.
I
do
have
a
few
here
that
we
wanted
to
review.
I
I
did
one
I
put
a
smiley
face
on
this
one.
Just
letting
people
know
that
if
you
do
find
spelling
mistakes
in
like
policies
and
stuff,
we
100
want
those
fixes.
A
So
I
know
a
lot
of
open
source
projects
are
like
trying
not
to
fix
spelling
mistakes,
but
in
these
cases
they're
crucially
important,
so
we
definitely
encourage
those.
So,
thanks
to
those
that
are
doing
that,
do
we
want
to
talk
about
mailer
or
any
of
the
other
bits,
while
we're
here
aj
looking
lovingly
in
your
direction,
I
think
you
had
one
or
two
in
here.
G
G
Yeah
that
one's
just
we
had
some
we're
just
looking
at
running
some
policies
against.
It
was
a
little
bit
of
a
weird
resource
I
mean
and
to
be
totally
upfront.
I
don't
do
a
whole
lot
with
azure,
so
yeah.
A
A
G
Yeah
the
client
just
the
way
it
comes.
The
the
way
that
we
create
a
client
is
a
little
bit
different,
but
we
just
get
a
couple
defender
properties
in
now,
so
we
can
write
some
policies
against
those
those
resources
we'll
be
adding
more
more
azure
support,
but
just
a
little
bit
there.
E
A
Obviously
I
don't
want
to
take
the
whole
meeting
with
everyone
reading
reading
everybody's
individual
issues,
but
I
did
add
the
examples
repo
to
the
bottom
there.
So,
if
you're
interested
in
keeping
track
of
what
the
workshop
examples
and
stuff
are,
that
will
be
there
other
than
that.
Does
anybody
have
anything
else?
Let
me
read
off
my
to-do
list
here,
as
your
community
manager,
the
stuff
that
you
want
me
to
do
so.
A
I'm
gonna
have
I'm
gonna
investigate
about
doing
a
c7n
workshop
just
for
azure
to
get
those
azure
stuff,
specifically
that
I
got
here
about
identity
and
setting
up
those
creds
and
stuff
like
that
seems
to
be
a
pain
point.
Does
that
sound,
accurate.
A
Two
pr's
you'd
like
to
see
prioritize
darren
for
kapil
and
then
just
general
feedback
on
the
gcp
when
using
in
is
that,
like
an
aws
jump
host
or
whatever
it
is
you're
using
whatever
resource
you
use
to
manage
from
an
aws
instance
or.
G
I'd
say
we
had
a
couple
people
coming
in
with
a
with
an
issue
around
checking
permissions,
and
it
was
the
one
that
we
have
logged
there
from
christian
on.
Let
fawn
in.
A
I'm
letting
fawn
in
is
it
a
pr
or.
G
7112
is
the
I
just
saw
an
update
on
it
this
morning,
but
I
owe
another
one.
G
It's
a
good
long,
I'm
just
bringing
it
up
just
in
case.
Anyone
has
hit
this
issue
if
you,
if
you've,
hit
something
where
it
says
too
many
principles
when
you're
trying
to
check
where
you're
trying
to
run
a
check
against
it's
the
check
permissions,
I'm.
G
Yeah
this
is
this,
is
one
of
those
pr's
that
it's
pulling
in
a
couple
different
things
and
we've
had
related
other
related
issues
and
pr
has
come
up.
I
owe
christian
a
failing
test.
I
think
a
couple
pieces
in
here,
so
you
know,
and
at
least
showing
how
it
can
break
so
that
one's
going
to
be
on
me
and
then
he's
talking
about
trying
to
pull
out
part
of
this
fix
because
there's
there's
part
of
it.
That's
pretty
straightforward
and
there's
part
of
it
that's
a
little
squirrely.
G
So
we
we
may
do
that
or
we
may
just
try
to
sort
it
out
and
get
it
all
fixed
together.
But
just.
A
A
G
That's
the
best
and
then
one
other
one
just
publicly
hold
myself
a
cannibal
thing.
7138
is
a
contribution
from
a
first
time
contributor.
All.
G
Yes,
kent
so
valid
issue,
oh
at
least
a
comment,
but
we
may
need
to
tweak
the
fix
a
little
bit.
Oh
that's
just
sure,
okay,
but
it
ties
into
some
other
work
in
the
service
quota
area
worth
bringing
up
here
only
in
case
anyone
else.
Any
of
you
have
run
into
service
quota
throttling
issues
if,
in
case
of
funds,
funds
landing
along.
So
okay,
yeah.
A
J
Yeah,
I
think
something
to
add.
There
is
what
jameson
also
mentioned
in
the
chat.
Do
not
run
this
thing.
You
know
more
than
once
a
week
because
you'll
get
your
time
get
real
angry.
J
G
D
G
This
is
yeah.
I
would
say
that
one,
the
most
immediate
issue
for
this
pr
is
that
we're
hitting
the
api
and
the
api
is
saying
like
hold
up.
I
can't
give
you
all
of
these
back
and
we
need
to.
We
need
to
batch
the
responses
and
we
need
to
retry,
which
it
looks
like
we're
not
doing
for
this
one
call:
that's
that's
a
code
fix
we
can.
We
can
help
with
that.
The
other.
G
Font
is
talking
about
which
is
related.
Is
that
if
we're
checking
and
submitting
service
requests
to
increase,
if
we're
submitting
customer
cases
to
increase
limits
on
the
aws
side,
it
takes
some
time
for
that
to
go
through
the
customer.
The
customer.
G
A
A
A
So,
according
to
kapil-
and
we
haven't
like
gone
and
like
gotten
on
the
schedule
or
anything.
G
A
Thing
and
then
they
they
say
you
know
custodian.
You
were
going
to
meet
in
this
room
and
you
know
or
that
table
or
whatever
we
haven't
gone
through
that
process,
but
we
are
definitely
going
to
go
to
pycon
as
a
group
and
do
this
event
the
exact
details
the
times
to
show
up
and
all
that
stuff
we
don't
have
yet.
J
A
J
A
Yeah,
do
you
have
my
contact
info,
I'm
just
jorge
at
stacklit
dot
io.
If
you.
G
A
A
J
C
Yeah,
I
think,
last
time
when
we
talked
about
this
topic,
we
said
we
are
going
to
develop
some
kind
of
a
guide
for
the
contributors,
something
in
that
related.
We
have
talked
last
time,
I'm
I'm
still
not
sure
if
that
is
still.
A
A
J
Okay,
so
aj
I've
never
done
this
before
these
sprints
development
sprints,
so
it
says
monday
to
tuesday
right.
I
I
presume
so
that
happened
those
days
right
now
on
the
weekend
correct.
G
I
I
would
say
I
I
have
that
link.
I
have
essentially
zero
knowledge
or
understanding
about
how
these
things
work.
I've
never
run
one
or
attended
one
myself,
so
yeah,
it
sounds
cool
is
about
all.
I
can
say,
that's
useful.
A
J
G
A
A
A
J
Too,
which
day
to
travel?
Because,
honestly,
you
know,
I
probably
won't
be
able
to
stay
a
whole
week.
So
I
want
to
be
there
when
we
have
this
sprint,
because
this
would
be
really
meaningful.
A
Yeah
and
it's
my
first
pycon,
so
I'm
absolutely
looking
forward
to
going
I've
heard
so
much
so
all
right
and
with
that
we
will
give
everyone
14
minutes
back
thanks
so
much
everyone
for
coming.
The
recording
and
notes
will
be
in
the
right
place
and
we'll
follow
up
on
all
these
items
over
the
course
of
the
week.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thanks.