►
From YouTube: App Runtime Platform Working Group [Nov 2, 2022]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
One
very
exciting
thing
that
we've
been
working
on
is
ripping
out
console
clients.
I
think
you
all
have
been
around
long
enough
that
you
remember
like
years
ago,
we
ripped
out
console
agents,
but
we
still
had
things
that
used
to
use
console
and
then
they,
you
still
had
to
provide
client
console
clients
to
them
to
instantiate
them
as
an
option.
So
we're
ripping
all
that
out
and
it's
been
very
exciting
and
we're
aware
of
this
Dynamic
ASG
issue.
A
That
sap
has
commented
you
to
do
this.
One
I,
don't
remember
who
wrote
the
slack
yeah.
B
From
our
team,
Vladimir
yeah
he's
currently
working
on
the
issue
more
or
less
investigating
it,
and
we
are
basically
trying
to
to
reproduce
and
to
provide
to
get
as
much
as
details
as
possible,
but
yeah
at
the
end.
Currently,
we
Face
some
performance
issues
and
the
feature
itself
is
disabled
on
all
our
now
Cloud
Foundry
environments.
Basically,
we
see
this
on
large-scale
landscapes
with
the
watch,
Diego
sales
and
the
tenths
of
case
of
one
cleaning
application
long
running
process.
A
Yeah
yeah,
all
the
information
you
can
get
us
is
great,
obviously
you're
the
largest
landscape
that
I
know
of
so
all
that
information
is
really
good.
Yeah.
B
So,
unfortunately,
what
is
on
vacation
this
week
previous
previous
week,
I
was
not
able
to
attend
the
investigation
due
to
the
summit.
Hopefully,
when
Once
he's
back
next
week,
we'll
kind
of
have
a
short
sync
with
him
and
either
provide
details
or
even
join
the
with
a
some
sort
of
fixes
needed
or
water.
A
A
A
And
from
the
TOC
they
passed
an
RFC,
that's
going
to
require
PR's
and
reviews
for
all
of
the
open
source
repos
soon,
so
I'm
not
sure
when
that
will
be
baked
into
the
automation
that
affects
all
the
pipelines.
I
suspect.
Just
one
day
you
will
have
to
something
will
fail
when
you
try
to
push
to
your
main
branch
and
it
doesn't
work.
A
Until
then
I
know,
my
team
has
started
doing
PR's,
just
like
as
a
preemptive
measure,
but
until
then
my
opinion
is
like
if
you
can
still
merge.
Whichever
way
you
can
merge
like
feel
free
to
do
that,
don't
feel
like
you
yeah.
Whatever
permissions
you
have
now,
that's
fine
for
you
to
use
them
cool
and
Stefan.
C
Oh
no
I,
don't
think
so.
Okay,
so
also,
maybe
only
a
short
one.
So
approached
us
also
from
talk,
because
you
approached
him,
but
the
sap
has
not
has
no
reviews
or
approvals
in
Diego
and
blogging
and
metrics.
C
In
my
team
we
are
working
and
logging
in
metrics
and
for
one
or
two
years
now
and
I
think
we
should
try
to
bring
up
some
people
who
are
working
more
on
the
Upstream
topics.
C
So
I
thought
we
are
not
yet
qualified
for
the
approval
role,
but
we
would
start
with
a
reviewer
role
and
we
discussed
internally,
who
can
do
it
and
I
think
the
Jovan
and
also
Felix
our
best
candidates?
I
think
Jovan
did
participate
a
lot
in
in
discussions
in
the
last
time
in
the
last
months
and
and
Felix
he's
a
main
contributor
to
this
new
feature
of
mtns
for
the
syslog
train,
so
I
just
put
them
both
into
one
project
fence.
Hopefully
that's
I
hope,
that's
fine,
yeah
and
I
hope.
C
There's
no
yeah
I
hope
it's!
It's
fine
for
you
that
we
just
nominate
them,
as
my
viewer
I
also
saw
that
we
don't
have
yet
another
viewer
team
for
our
working
group,
not
sure
if
we,
if
it's
automatically
created
what
we
have
reviewer
in
this
file
yeah.
So
that's
our
proposal
so
and
then
I
hope.
Also,
if
you
currently,
the
issue
is
that
there
are
not
so
many
pull
requests
feature
advice,
so
they
cannot
review
a
lot
of
new,
exciting
things,
but
also
if
they
review
the
version
bumps.
C
A
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much
for
submitting
this
that'll
be
great
yeah
you're
right.
We
don't
have
reviewers
yet
so
I.
C
A
That
the
team
will
be
created
automatically
ones
that
exists,
but
they'll,
be
our
guinea
pigs
for
figuring
out
how
to
make
it
work
and
I
think
this
will
paired
nicely
with.
When
we're
forced
to
do
PRS.