►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
the
foundational
infrastructure
working
group
meeting,
yeah,
not
a
lot
of
pr's
currently
to
discuss
this
one
has
been
open
for
a
long
time.
A
I
think
constantine
was
on
vacation,
but
he's
back
now
I'll
bring
him
again.
A
Okay,
actually,
I
think
matthias.
You
are
now
an
official
reviewer
right.
B
B
A
B
A
Yeah,
no,
so
what
we
did
on
the
community
side
is.
There
was
a
whole
thing
where
we
went
through
the
we
added
a
new
role
right,
so
there's
roles
and
then
there's
like
an
official
reviewer
role
and
the
idea
of
a
reviewer
is
that
you're
you're,
not
you
cannot
approve
or
you
cannot
merge
something,
but
you
can
be
assigned
as
a
reviewer
to
get
to.
A
At
it,
so
this
is
like
a
way
to
get
the
required
credits
to
become
an
approval,
but
previously
you
you
as
a
contrib
contributor.
You
are
just
part
of
the
art,
but
you
wouldn't
be
allowed.
You
couldn't
be
assigned
to
the
pr
because
of
how
the
arc
is
set
up
and
now
you
can,
because
you
have
read
access
or
something
you
ever
it's
open
source,
but
I
I
think
you
needed
some
other
permission.
B
A
But
this
is
just
yeah
and
also
reviewers
now
show
up
in
the
working
group
destination
right.
So
we
have
working
groups.
You
know
we
have
foundational
infrastructure
area.
A
A
So
yeah,
that's
all
the
overvr,
so
that's
not
much
yeah.
It
has
been
a
bit
probably
notification
period,
but
the
one
big
thing
that
we
have
merged
in
the
previous
few
weeks
is
the
the
net
2.0
thing,
as
you
might
all
be
aware,
have
you
been
able
to
test
that
or
use.
B
This
well,
we
tested
it
but
did
change.
Let.
B
We
missed
the
configuration
change
for
vm
bus
that
was
done,
post
deployment
in
may,
and
now
we
bring
this
into
our
landscapes.
We
have
to
ensure
vm
recreation
and
then
we
will
give
274
a
try
and
I
just
saw
yesterday
there
was
another
another
fix
for
it.
So
maybe
it's
good
that
we're
not
the
first
ones
but
yeah
yeah,
then,
hopefully,
into
two
or
three
weeks.
A
B
Yeah-
and
I
remember
regarding
scale
and
nets
we
had
a
few
years
ago
to
change
the
maths,
library,
the
director's
side,
and
we
were
the
only
one
who
saw
those
issues
where
basically
the
event
machine
variant
was
losing
messages
and
that
really
happened
at
high
scale.
So
I
guess
we
can
put
that
scale
test.
Then.
A
B
A
And
we
introduced
a
sync
gem,
so
there's
like
a
nat
sync
gem
that
syncs
the
state
of
the
director
with
the
nets
process
for
the
authentication,
because
previously
the
authentication
was
done
based
on
the
like
the
third
name,
the
common
name
in
the
certificate
right.
The
agent
was
there,
the
agent
id
was
extracted
from
that,
and
that
corresponds
to
like
a
channel
something
right.
A
So
there's
like
this
already
sold
rules
in
the
net
configuration
about
agents,
although
only
being
allowed
to
post
things
to
a
channel
with
their
agent
id
in
it,
and
that
was
that
was
done
through
a
fork
of
nets
right.
So
that
was
not
something
that
was
in
upstream
nets
so
to
go
to
up
upstream
nets.
We
had
to
find
a
way
to
keep
that
same
security
model
and
the
only
way
we
could
do
that
is
by
adding
users
for
each
agent.
B
A
A
A
A
B
A
That
is
also
interesting.
This
is
the
feature
cpi
again.
A
79
is
that,
but
that's
what
I
tried
so
they
should
try
with
the
latest
version.
B
B
B
Sorry
I
was
muted,
so
I
I
was
asking
when
who,
who
does
actually
receive
this
certificate
error,
it's
the
director
when
it
tries
to
download
the
stem
cell
from
bosch
io.
Doesn't
it.
A
Okay
or
it
could
be,
okay,
wait,
so
it's
downloading
the
stamp
set
yeah.
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
B
B
B
A
That's
a
long
time
ago
just
want
to
commit.
A
A
I'm
not
that
familiar
with
the
windows
stuff
does
somebody
know.
A
Okay
and
I'm
gonna,
look
at
at
this
for
a
later
time
seems
like
we
should
just
probably
bump
this,
but
I
don't
know
where
we
define,
which
version
of
this
we
actually
include.
B
B
B
Not
that
we
saw
any
issues,
I'm
not
sure
what
they,
what
kind
of
network
components
they
have,
maybe
our
infrastructures
can
just
handle
it.
So
we
don't
know.
A
B
And
when
was
it
introduced?
Do
we
know
that
they
mentioned
some
commit.
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
B
Yeah,
so
I
already
gave
you
some
heads
up
that
I
will
step
down
as
product
owner
for
the
bosch
team
at
sap,
and
I
would
like
to
introduce
max
this,
who
is
basically
from
our
area
with
an
sap
and
he
will
take
over
now
during
september,
and
so
I
expect
that
he
will
regularly
join
the
meeting
as
well
to
then
yeah
stay
in
contact
and
yeah
yeah
yeah.
Maybe
you
need
some
time
to
understand
everything
but
yeah.
This
will
be
there.
Of
course.
Recent
months.
A
Okay,
yeah
sad
to
see
you
go
but
congrats
on
the
new
opportunity
practically.
Does
that
mean
you're
stepping
down
as
an
approver.
B
Probably
yes,
so
that
would
mean
I
at
least
would
create
a
pr
for
that.
Right,
yes
and
then
yeah.
A
And
it's
max:
are
you
interested
in
like
becoming
a
reviewer
to
become
an
improver?
Eventually,
I
don't
know
if
that's.
B
B
B
Maybe
but
maybe
we
should
suggest
the
review
opportunity
to
untrade.