►
From YouTube: Foundational Infrastructure Working Group [Mar 31, 2022]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yes,
first
off,
I
started
experimenting
with
this
thing:
static
code
analysis.
It
has
been
acquired
by
github.
So
probably
it's
going
to
be
more
integrated
at
some
point
but
yeah
I
thought
maybe
that's
useful
to
have
on
some
vr.
So
I've
enabled
it
for
bosch
and
bosch
agents
for
now.
A
Around
matching
of
host
names
in
some
something
in
a
test
and
something
in
a
a
death
package
or
something
so
nothing
really
severe.
I
thought
it
would
be
nice
to
to
see
what
it
gives
us.
Some
vrs
yeah
open,
pr's
this
one
I'm
currently,
so
I
reviewed
this
together
with
constantine
they're.
Never.
A
A
A
This
one
requires
a
rebase.
I've
asked
for
that,
but
it
is,
it
should
be
a
once
rebased.
It
should
be
ready
for
review
because
it
has
been
tested
by
soft
layer
and
it
fixes
their
issue,
so
we
should
be
able
to
get
this
merged
pretty
soon.
A
A
So
it
feels
like
we
should
install
the
normal
kernel
in
the
os
image
and
then
later
in,
like
a
stem
cell
stage
like
stem
cell
aws
and
then
aws
vips
right,
that's
where
we
want
to
like
start
diverging
so
yeah
just
refactoring
it
a
bit,
but
it
doesn't
feel
like
if
I'm
gonna
do
that
through
review
comments.
It's
gonna
be
too
much
because
that
I
don't
know
it
has
already
been
open
for
so
long.
A
So
I'm
just
gonna
make
it
fix
it
and
then
make
a
pr
against
his
pr
or
something
and
then
we'll
go
from
there.
A
A
C
C
C
A
Would
be
good
to
for
maybe
if
you
could
do
that
on
monday,
then
we
can
get
these
results.
D
There
was
a
interesting
question.
B
And
then
there's
extended
report
support.
Yes,.
A
A
I
I
think
I
got
an
email
last
week
or
something
that
they
are
still
on
it.
It's
just
they
are
really
busy
with
their
finalizing
the
gemmy
release.
So
that's
why
they're
a
bit
slow
with
everything
but
yeah-
and
I
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
this.
It's
a
good
question,
though,
but
this
like
we
want.
Basically,
if
we're
gonna
do
fibs,
so
there's
the
technical
side,
which
is
this
pr
and
then
there's
the
v1
support
from
canonical
right
and
how
is
canonical
gonna
support
this
work
going
forward
and
that's
the
business
side.
C
Yeah,
I
also
would
wonder
what
it
actually
means.
So,
given
that
people
who
buy
for
the
advantage
package,
they
would
also
buy
for
the
extended
support.
I
guess-
and
the
question
then,
would
just
be:
how
would
we
keep
these
things
here
stable
so
that
bionic
bills
will
still
work
in
some
private
setups.
A
A
It's
just
about
like
keep
cut
that
we
need
to
keep
cutting
stem
cells
for
bionic
till
that
date,
and
then
we,
I
don't
know
who
he
we
is
in
this
case
right,
like
who's
gonna,
be
responsible
for
taking
care
of
that
pipeline
and
looking
after
it,
I
think
that's
the
main
question,
and
that
also
depends
on
who
is
using
it
right.
A
I
guess,
if,
like
sap
is
gonna,
adopt
this
stem
cell,
then
you're
probably
more
inclined
to
start
help
with
that,
and
if
it's
just
other
canonical
customers,
then
maybe
canonical
can
look
after
that
pipeline
or
something.
A
A
This
one
just
need
to
review
tests
were
added
four
days
ago,
so
it's
now
ready
for
review.
I've
assigned
reviewers
or
I've
asked
github
to
assign
with
yours
and
ramon,
and
benjamin
are
the
chosen
ones.
A
A
But
it
will
do
but
ramona
will
come
up
in
your
weekly
or
no
monthly
review.
Oh,
if
you
do
assign
yourself.
A
Yeah,
that's
it!
Let's
go
over
the
issues.
I
I
was
able
to
merge
a
few
pr's.
Oh,
and
there
was
a
something
postgresql
coming
up
right.
Was
that
not
no?
There
was
already.
A
A
On
what
you
you,
there
were
people
on
your
team
gonna
work
on
bombing
postgres
in
the
postgres
release;
right,
oh,
no!
No.
C
A
C
Persistence,
team
and
I
guess
it's
him.
A
D
A
Yeah,
it's
an
option,
I
know
about
it
because
it
bro
it
was
not
compatible
with
ruby
3.1,
so
vermont
had
to
bump
it,
and
then
I
had
to
figure
out
how
to
release
a
new
version
which
has
not
happened
in,
like
I
don't
know
a
few
years,
so
I
did
it
manually,
but
it
can
be
used
to
like
test
your
porsche
releases,
so
you
can
like
make
unit
tests
for
the
templates
in
there
good
to
know
yeah.
It's
quite
neat
for
that.
A
C
Maybe
we
can
ask
that
for
some
source
and
target
example
files
so
that
we
better
understand
yeah
what
exactly
they
want
to
convert.
A
Something
like
that,
what
else
wait
this
is
now
in
discussion,
face.
B
So
what
I
read
this
issue,
but
I
don't
understand
why
this
has
anything
to
do
with
the
fee:
switch
cpi
release.
C
Okay,
well
so
I
remember
it's
super
long
ago,
but
in
2016
I
was
in
the
cpi
team
doing
my
dojo
and
I
remember
that
the
mess
with
the
vsphere
cpi,
including
some
data
about
disks
into
the
id
that
was
returned
by
the
cpi.
Maybe
it's
something
like
this
so
that
the
data
returned
by
the
cpi.
It
has
a
certain
format
which
is
not
easy
to
write
into
the
database.
B
Yeah
but
I
mean
I
deployed
a
bosch
with
vsphere
like
yesterday
with
the
latest
cpi,
so
it
worked
perfectly
fine.
So
I
think
it's
an
upgrade
issue
like
maybe
one
from
postgres
9
4
to
13
or.
A
A
Okay,
I
don't
know
what
to
do
here.
Let's
continue
when
I
will
get
back
to
it.
I
will
probably
ask
connie
because
mostly.
B
A
C
And
maybe
one
thing
I
today
updated
this
errand
issue,
so
what
we
will
do
is
we
will
work
on
a
deprecation
flag
and
get
some
internal
discussions
and
have
clear
timelines
that
we
can
get
rid
of
it
2023.
A
C
Like
flag
support
old
iron
behavior,
or
something
like
that,
all
right.
B
And
do
we
want
did
do
we
want
to
make
this
like
a
hidden
flag
or
just
out
in
the
open,
and
just
I
mean.
B
Yeah,
I
thought
we
were
talking
about
porsche
errands
and
then,
when
you
run
that
and
then.
A
C
Yeah
so
so
in
the
coming
days
I
would
yeah
provide
more
details
from
the
interface
like
flag
name
and
where
it
would
live.
Then
that's
clear
before
we
start
the
work
sure.