►
From YouTube: CNB Core Team Sync: 2022-01-12
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Looks
like
we're
live
streaming
thanks
for
doing
that,
I
think
javier
any
new
faces.
I
feel
like
emily's
a
new
face
at
least
a
new
face
in
the
last
four
months.
B
C
E
A
I'm
just
kidding
I'll
do
that
to
her
right
for
tomorrow
at
least.
B
Cool
all
right,
I
will
share
my
screen
and
move
on
to
extending
speculars.
B
So,
starting
from
the
bottom,
I
think
these
are
still
dependent
on
anthony's
thing.
I
just
re.
I
just
approved
it
earlier
today.
I
think
and
also
proved
it
so
if
it's
joe
here
joe's
not
here,
if
you
could
take
a
look
emily
since
I
think
you
have
voting
things,
I
need
to
get
that
thing
merged
would
appreciate
the
ad
status
fields
thing
on
the
rfc
repo
and
then
we.
B
Close
out
these
asset
packaging
things,
since
we
put
that
rfc
in
hold,
got
it
this
exception,
spec
vr.
This
is
the
giraffe
for
the
dockerfile
sports
stuff
from
stevens
rfc,
filter,
distribution,
spec.
A
I
think
we've
got
all
the
approvals
except
for
stephen.
Are
we
waiting
for
him
on
this.
D
Add
emily's
name
to
it,
which
one
whichever
one
of
the
two
wins
will
be
another
race.
D
C
D
C
B
It's
fine,
it
still
would
be
nice.
B
Well,
now
that
you're
back,
we
don't
have
to
worry
about
that
problem,
so
yep
wandering
the
bridge
yeah,
I
assume
one
of
youtube
will
get
to
it
or
you'll.
Tell
us
you
don't
need
our
votes
eventually,
when
you
find
the
spreadsheet
by
the
way,
hopefully.
C
B
Close
this
next
week,
it's
been
open
for
two
months
so
would
like
to
the
interns
not
even
interning
or
they're,
not
even
being
mentored
by
javier
anymore,
but
still
would
like
to
see
it
through.
B
So
I
guess
then
tell
me
if
we
actually
need
one
other
votes,
but
I
assume
this
is
also
a
thing.
You
probably
want
to
take
a
look
at
too,
since
it
relates
to
the
platform.
B
Yeah,
just
I
see
me
well
but
just
make
sure
to
read,
I
guess
276,
where
natalie
talks
about
all
this
stuff.
F
C
I
think
app
is
here
is
like
a
historical
thing
that
hasn't
been
true
since
in
api
we
no
longer
support
like
the
first
pre-version
dpi,
but
also,
I
feel,
like
we've
talked
enough
about
renaming
directories
and
used
apps.
I
don't
actually
I'm
okay
with
this
resort
reading
this
word
just
because
you
want
to
use
it.
I
don't
think
we
have
to
take
it
out
to
pull
this
in,
but
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
we
don't
actually
use
it.
B
Okay,
do
you
want
us
to
track
that
somehow
or
you're
okay,
if
it
wasn't
falling
into
either
okay.
B
Cool
man,
it
feels
good
to
merge
stuff
again.
It's
like
we
don't
even
need
stephen
to
come
back,
I'm
still
working
on
this
piece
to
some
degree.
I
know
when
joe
did
this
last
time
he
got
he
was
he
drafted
up
the
release,
notes
as
part
of
the
pr,
but
I
at
least
wanted
to
put
this
up.
B
That's
all
I
have
that's
all.
We
have
for
spec
prs,
moving
on
to
release
planning,
so
we
talked
about
project
scripture.
Point
two:
is
there
other
stuff
that
we
want
to
bring
up
in
release
planning.
A
F
C
F
C
B
E
B
B
E
B
A
B
Cool
is
there
anything
else
on
delpako,
eight.
B
F
So
I
know
we
are
doing
a
bunch
of
work
on
that
docker
files,
rfc
there's
one
part
of
that
functionality.
That
should
be
relatively
easy
to
implement
without,
like
the
whole
mechanical
builder
stuff,
which
is
dynamic,
runtime
emit
selection.
F
F
B
F
Yeah,
I
I
mean
that
would
be
amazingly
useful
for
a
bunch
of
like
it'll
unlock
a
bunch
of
features.
I
think
I
think
both
on
our
side
and
right
outside,
like
they've,
also
wanted
that
for
a
while.
Even
if
you
can't
extend
things
if
you
can
just
have
a
bunch
of
different
drone
images
with
the
required
packages
and
select
between
them,
that
would
also
be
great.
F
Yeah
you
can
try,
what
are
others
do.
Others
think
that's
a
good
plan.
B
I
need
to,
I
definitely
need
to
revisit
like
it's
been
a
while,
since
I've
read
that
rfc,
I
don't
know
what
the
state
of
it's
in
I'm
sure
others
are
probably
similar,
see
javier
nunning,
but
I
like
off
the
cuff,
I'm
not
like
opposed
to
the
concept
of
runtime
image
selection.
F
Because
that
the
implementation
of
the
rfc
is
different,
I
at
some
point
suggested
that
we
could
just
do
it
from
the
dockerfiles
rfc
like
if
you
just
use
the
from
instruction
and
that
will
give
you
a
run-time
limit
selection.
So
that's
why
the
other
rc
was
cropped.
I'm
just
saying
we
restrict
the
dock
of
lrc
to
just
allow
from
instructions.
F
A
F
Based
on
that
extensions,
rfc,
it's
supposed
to
work
so
and
kaliko
supports
that
as
well.
I
think
soldiers
will
live,
but
in
our
case
doesn't
matter,
we
ignore
all
the
previous
form
instructions
take
the
last
form
instruction
and
use
that
to
save
an
image
like
in
in
terms
of
implementation.
It's
true
right,
interesting.
B
F
So
that's
a
large
pull
request
that
works,
but
they're
missing
some
edge
cases,
which
is
why
they've
not
merged
it
and
we
might
be
able
to
get
away
without
it
as
well,
because
I
opened
some
issues
on
the
image
scanners
that
are
aware
of
the
build
pack
and
cosine
spawn
format
and
can
merge
things
on
their
side.
So.
B
F
A
I
am
curious,
even
if
it
did
work,
are
we
concerned
about
not
having
parody
with
the
other
formats?
You
know
spdx
swift,
not
at
all.
F
A
B
A
Probably
not
not
this
week
I
mean
the
the
life
cycle.
Pr
is
still
making
its
way
through.
So
you
know.
B
Cool
anything
else
for
milestone
releases.
A
I
I
guess
this
is
maybe
also
a
good
time
to
bring
up
a
question
that
we
had
on
the
s
bomb
stock,
actually
more
effects
for
the
bill
pack
api,
but
we
have
matt
here.
I
guess
there's
some
difficulty
that
has
been
created
in
not
allowing
gold
pack
to
output,
old,
moms
and
new
bombs
at
the
same
time-
and
I
wonder
if
you
know
like
after
we've
all
discussed
it,
you
know
whether
any
actions
from
that
could
make
it
into
a
a
new
spec
matt.
E
Yeah
hoping
to
speak
more
so
tomorrow,
but
the
way
that
the
build
pack,
the
current
o7
build
pack
api
prevents
release
as
implemented,
prevents
the
writing
of
the
legacy
bomb
format
right
now.
Buildpack
implements
that
format,
which
means
all
of
our
current
users
that
are
executing
their
build
packs.
On
our
previous
platform,
api.
E
E
A
The
platforms
mitigate
the
migration
from
new
format
to
old
format,.
D
No
because
there
was
no
standardized
old
format
like
there
is
stuff
crammed
into
labels.
That
then
were
by
convention
red,
but
there
was
no
mechanical
transformation
between
those
two
like
I'm,
not
arguing
for
one
side
or
the
other,
especially
since
this
deeply
affects
me
specifically
but
like
by
by
design
the
move
from
zero,
seven
to
zero,
eight
or
zero
six,
two
zero
seven.
Whenever
this
broke
was
intended
to
be
non-compatible
right,
it's
you
know,
pre-100.
D
There
is
no
guarantee
about
deprecation
policies
or
anything
like
that.
So
I
don't
think
that
there's
a
mandate
that
we
do
this,
that
we
go
back
and
allow
both
to
coexist
for
some
period
of
time,
but
at
the
same
time,
boy
it'd
make
my
life
easier.
If
we
did
yes.
E
E
B
Think
yeah,
that
makes
sense,
do
you
want
to
did
you?
Have
you
opened
an
issue
on
spec
about
this,
for
oh
wait.
E
I
have
not,
it
was
unclear
the
best
way
to
handle
this.
I
was
thinking
to
begin
directing
at
rc.
B
Yeah,
an
rfc
is
also
fine.
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
it?
You're
mentioning
one
talk
about
more
tomorrow.
B
Cool
anything
else
on
release
planning
before
we
move
on.
B
We
don't
need
read
only
layers
force
between
build
packs.
It's
still
blocked
is
that
right,
natalie.
B
Docker
files-
I
know
some
work
still
being
done
on
this
and
there's
basically
poc
work.
That
is
happening,
I
believe,
from
the
red
hat
side.
B
Okay,
spacey
next
week.
B
He
has
exploral
layers
sam.
B
B
They
see
all
the
project
descriptors
stuff
together,
including
the
converter.
Does
that
sound
right
to
you,
javier
and
natalie?
Unless
you
want
to
push
this
forward
natalie.
B
Okay,
so
this
is,
you
are
tying
all
this
stuff
with
javier
joe's
cool
rum
run
image
s-bomb.
A
B
Okay,
I
will
add
emily
since
she's
back
to
this,
and
then
I
can
also
ping
joe
to
take
a
look
that
sounds
like
you
guys
had
a
chance
to
touch
base
on
stuff
since
last
week,.
B
Image
table,
I
think,
there's
some
open
stuff
here.
We
have
not
labeled
this,
which
is
why
no
one's
a
sign
is
that
right,
ben.
B
D
D
B
Cool,
I
feel,
like
you,
had
a
bunch
of
open
questions
here
as
well.
Javier
right.
A
Yeah,
I
think
what
was
it
joe
summarized
it,
and
I
haven't
looked
at
the
answers
provided
by
the
original
poster.
Okay.
B
Status
fields,
I
think
this
looks
good.
Do
I
just
need
yeah?
I
just
need
one
more
person
to
approve
basically
without
forcing
this,
so
if
I
can
con
you
into
doing
it
that
way,
I
would
be
this.
B
An
action
item
from
an
rfc
pack,
tom
all
all
right,
so
replace
positional
arts.
B
So
this
might
have
to
wait.
I
guess
until
stephen
comes
back
in
force
next
week,
I
imagine
he'll
be
busy.
The
week
gets
back
too.
B
F
F
B
All
right,
so
this
is
just
waiting
on
reviews.
Basically,
this
is
what
you're
saying
sam.
E
B
All
right,
propulsive
move
to
cncf
slack.
F
Hey,
I
don't
know
if
I
need
to
re-request
reviews,
but
cncf
team
said
that
they
will
not
be
able
to
move
channels
that
are
outside
of
the
project,
to
the
slack
instance,
but
don't
create.
We
can
create
them,
though
right
yeah,
but
they
will
not
do
it
as
part
of
the
migration
they'll.
You
can,
like,
I
think,
you'll
have
to
request
a
new
channel.
A
F
F
A
B
B
F
B
B
F
B
B
Oh,
that
one
here
too
take
a
look
cool.
I
think
that's
rc
review.
Are
there
things
you
want
to
talk
about
for
agenda
tomorrow?
I
know
matt
mentioned
the
migration
for
kind
of
the
s
bomb
or
bomb
slash
bomb
stuff
for
fieldpack
08.
B
As
a
topic,
I
feel
like
there's
something
else.
Someone
else
mentioned.
A
I'm
guessing
something
was
it
sam's
run
image
selector.
B
Yeah
are
there
any
of
these
rfc
that
we
want
to
talk
about
before
steven
gets
back.
B
A
B
A
Have
extra
time
I
might
try
to
eat
it
up
with
some
of
the
project.
Descriptor
conversation.
B
B
Cool
we'll
get
this
copied
over
for
the
gen
tomorrow.
Anything
else
before
we
close.
B
I'll
take
the
silences
and
now
see
everyone
here
tomorrow
for
working
group
thanks,
everyone.