►
From YouTube: CNB Core Team Sync
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Please
sign
in
if
you
haven't,
I
guess
I'll
do
meeting
today
since
I
will
be
jess
and
I
will
be
out
next
week.
A
Seeing
wait
now,
that's
inspectors.
A
Awesome
spec
changes
for
image
sentence.
B
We
can
maybe
put
this
into
draft
pending
some
further
conversations.
I
don't
think
this
is
actually
ready
to
be
voted
on.
I
thought
the
feedback
that
I
needed,
which
is
good.
A
Cool
terminology:
did
you
all
move
this?
The
0.9
is
that
true,
this
wasn't
0.8
right.
A
I
think
this
is
awesome
thanks
for
doing
this
natalie.
I
just
put
a
few
comments
earlier
today,
happy
to
bike
shed
further
on
morning,
stuff
async,
I
don't
know
other
folks
have
had
a
chance
to
look.
C
A
Awesome,
a
nice
merch
conflict.
Oh
this
requires
you,
okay,
finalize
build
pack
08.
C
A
Oh
sorry,
I
have
like
less
good
when
I
see
him
where
I
can't
see
everyone
who's
on
the
call.
What's
up,
you
want
the
list
cmb
bill,
pactor
other
licensed
provider.
C
We
created
a
pr
that
had
a
list
of
all
the
environment
variables,
but
it
didn't
have
bill
pector,
which
was
still
off
in
its
own
section,
so
this
moves
build
hector
in
with
the
other
ones.
I
think
there's
still
refactoring
to
be
done
to
make
this
all
make
sense
globally,
but
this
seems
like
the
minimum
amount
of
refactoring-
that's
not
making
things
worse
in
this
version.
A
That
makes
sense.
This
is
304.
C
C
A
Okay,
yes,
we
can
haggle
better
jail
at
some
point.
A
Assuming
stephen
doesn't
have
changes
he
wants
on
that.
Okay,
so
once
that
gets
done,
we
can
kind
of
get
el
paco8
sorted.
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
last
blocking
thing
right.
C
A
C
A
C
I
don't
have
strong
preferences
here,
I
think.
Usually
we
cut
the
release
as
soon
as
we
merge.
Okay,
we
can
cut
this
one.
If
you
want
to
cut
it
right
now,
I
think
it's
ready
right.
We
have
draft
release,
notes
that
natalie
wrote.
A
Okay,
does
natalie
have
permission
to
do
that
stuff
once
I
merge
this
then,
or
do
you
need
to
do
that.
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
It's
like
feels
like
a
real
spread
thing
over
here,
but
they.
A
Shipped
it
and
left
it
yeah,
I'm
sure
it's
unfunded
somewhere
cool,
so
bill
pack
away
it's
about
to
come
out,
barring
basie
one
approval
and
then.
A
Billpacco9
is
getting
the
show,
removal
stuff
is
that
that's
true,
and
that
also
includes
utility
bill
pack.
Our
first
utility
bill
packages.
A
C
A
A
Cool
starting
from
bottom,
hopefully
12
min
10
minutes
to
go
through
all
this
stuff
support,
doc
files.
I
heard
you
all
talked
about
this
a
bunch.
Last
week
I
was
out.
B
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
do
think
at
this
point.
It
would
be
helpful
to
update
the
proof
of
concept
to
do
some
of
this
stuff,
because
then
we
can
maybe
feel
a
little
bit
more
confident
that
we
like
the
direction
if
we
can
see
it
in
action.
A
I
saw
javier
added
a
comment
on
here.
A
B
A
A
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
almost
wonder,
does
probably
a
separate
discussion,
but
like
project
descriptor.
Should
that
be
a
thing
that
has
to
think
about
some
of
the
stuff
like
that
is
more
owned
by
probably
platform
than
anything
else,
because
it,
I
think,
with
platform
kind
of
being
stupid,
representing
a
bunch
of
platforms,
they
see
that
interaction
there
cool
support
for
pack
tumble.
A
This
is
like
joe's
thing.
Yeah
is
this
still
considered
stuff
team
are
saying
so.
A
Yep,
this
is
also
team.
Rc
I'll
fix
that
I
think.
A
A
Yeah
script:
okay:
I
guess.
C
A
Was
interested
in
basically
this
comment
from
you.
I
wonder
if
we
want
to
expand
on
that
more
tomorrow,.
A
Okay,
propose
alternative
products,
f1
and
that's
another
stuff
you
might
have
seen
and
that
the
supplement
cache
is
also
subject.
Rc
awesome.
A
No,
I
mean
there's
this
one
utility
and
the
scaffolding
stuff.
That
was
pretty
actually
the.
C
C
C
A
I'm
not
here
to
blame
anyone
I
am
for
tomorrow
did
we
want
to
talk
about
the
run
image
s-bomb
stuff,
namely,
if
we
want
to
open
this
can
of
worms
up
again
of
just
like
industry
standards,
how
we
want
to
attach
or
associate
s-bomb
stuff?
I
know
we've
talked
about
it
before.
C
The
disagreement,
so
we
can
focus
on
it
because
I
feel
like
at
least
in
my
mind.
I
just
end
up
opining
upon
this.
Whenever
we
talk
about
it,
because
I
feel
obligated
to
say
something,
the
truth
is,
I
really
just
don't
care
that
much
which
of
the
formats
we
bring
it
in
from.
So
if
there
is
a
disagreement,
I'd
love
to
figure
out
what
it
is
exactly
and
who's
disagreeing.
C
A
A
Running
just
bomb
samus
in
here-
I
I
don't
this
may
have-
or
I
don't
want
to
spend
too
much
time
on
this
but
natalie
when
we
chatted
at
the
extra
long
working
group
where
I
couldn't
make
the
working
group
we
did
an
hour
afterwards
did
were
there
still
disagreements
between
the
conclusion
of
that
and
what
sam
wants
is
that,
where
we're
at.
B
A
Yeah
you
mean
not
not
like
a
unified
spawn
but
having
the
snippets
of
each
s-bomb
layer
actually
survive
or
like
actually
stick
in
the
image
at
all.
As
something
you're
worried
about
item,
I
think
the
hard
part
is:
how
do
do
you
do
a
rebuild?
That's
the
only
thing
I'm
worried
about
is
we
have
to
save
the
s-bomb
information
for
you
know
like
so
when
you
rebuild
based
on
the
previous
image,
it
gets
recovered.
B
A
I
don't
think
I
have
a
very
strong
opinion.
Can
we
can?
We
just
have
one
final
like
we'll
just
spend
yeah,
let's
say
unbox
it
tomorrow,
time
box.
It
says
time
box
for
15
minutes
and
actually
I
I
will
call
it
if
we
hit
that
time.
We
don't
come
to
decisions,
so
we
can
not
talk
about
forever,
but
sam's,
not
here,
and
we
have
two
minutes
left
in
this
meeting
and
I
would
like
to
end
on
time.
So,
let's
put
this
on
deck
for
tomorrow.
A
I
know
sam
wanted
to
do
launcher
stuff
with
the
bloomberg
folks
again.
A
A
C
A
I'll
play
my
life,
it's
broken
yeah,
please
do
cool
and
then
you're
gonna
go.
Do
that
emily
natalie.
A
Okay,
I
guess
just
hang
us
on
slack
and
then
I
can
review
and
thumbs
up
once
again.