►
From YouTube: CNB Core Team Sync
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Should
we
get
started,
I
think,
since
he
missed
us
a
month,
we
should
let
terrence
run
the
meeting.
A
I
think
we
could
survive
without
one
of
you,
but
it
was
a
it's
been
a
nobody.
B
A
B
A
B
Where
I
I
feel
like
joe,
never
comes
to
these
because
he
another
meeting
during
this
time,
I'm
happy
to
run
it.
Are
we
doing
the
is
the
agenda
still
the
same?
Has
that
not
changed.
A
It
is
still
the
same.
I
pasted
it
in
to
our
notes
for
today.
B
B
Stack
pull
request;
rather
your
screen.
B
C
A
I
was
trying
to
leave
some
feedback.
I
did
have
one
suggestion
for
a
new
terminology
that
I
was
going
to
maybe
put
in
here,
but
I
think
we
call
like
the
plan
that
a
build
pack
generates
the
build
plan
and
we
also
call
the
plan
that
the
life
cycle
generates
the
build
plan
which
is
sort
of
like
taking
components,
a
resolved,
build
plan
from
all
the
build
packs.
I
was
wondering
if
we
would
like
to
call
the
life
cycle
generated
one
like
a
resolved,
build
plan.
Maybe.
A
B
A
If
you
will,
are
you
suggesting
that
we
call
it
the
super
plan?
No.
B
A
Like
you
know,
because
they're
compared
against
each
other
for
compatibility
and
then
a
build
plan
that
all
the
bill
packs
can
agree
on
is
resolved
from
the
different
options
they
give.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
also
not
necessarily
do
that
bike
shed
in
this
particular
pull
requests,
but.
A
A
C
Use
some
feedback
I've
gone
ahead
and
started
writing
the
implementation,
assuming
that
this
or
something
close
to
it
is
going
to
be
the
thing
that
we
ship
but.
B
Yes-
and
this
is
just
the
platform-
the
colon
changes
of
the
same
thing
right.
B
Cool
every
word
to
that
sorry,
sorry,
I
missed
what
you
were
saying
reviewer
to
that.
E
Just
for
the
platform,
I
I
trust
everybody
else
on
stuff.
I
don't
know
anything
about.
B
Awesome:
okay,
cool
moving
on
to
release
planning.
B
Yeah
any
objection
of
me
closing
it.
B
E
I
don't
know
casey
if
you
have
more
contacts
on
that.
I'm
sorry,
I
just
called
you
casey
and
that's
emily.
A
A
Black
hole
terence
fell
into,
so
maybe
we.
B
A
B
Yeah,
that
would
be
my
recommendation
if
there's
something
that's
blocked
on
jesse,
that
we
want
to
actually
get
done
within
the
next
month
or
so,
or
at
least
make
some
progress
on.
We
should
definitely
offload
it
off
of
his
plate.
A
Is
there
any
dependency
between
stack
removal
and
the
docker
file
stuff
as
well?
I
feel
like
some
of
the
things
like
mix-ins,
don't
really
make
sense
with
image
extensions
right-
and
I
don't
know
if
I've
refreshed
myself
with
the
details
lately,
but
there
could
be
parts
of
the
files
themselves
that
presuppose
a
stackless
world.
C
B
C
A
A
B
B
B
B
I
mean
maybe
we
can
find
some
time
after
that
meeting
on
tuesday.
I
don't
think
I
have
anything
particular
I
need
to
do,
but.
B
E
E
B
A
E
Yeah
and
I
guess
what
maybe
I'm,
having
trouble
understanding
how
we're
going
to
end
or
come
to
a
resolution
is,
I
know,
you're
planning
to
have
conversations,
but
I
think
jesse
was
owning
a
certain
part
of
it
and
he
is
no
longer
like
do
we
have
somebody
else,
that's
owning
it
now,
aside
from
saying
hey
we're
gonna
meet
about
this.
Like
do
we
have
a
champion.
E
Unfortunately,
but
I
guess
it
depends
on
how
critical
this
is
right
to
stack
removals.
C
I
don't
think
so.
I
think
with
the
I
think,
maybe
at
the
point
where
dockerfiles
is
ready
to
graduate
from
experimental
to
like
fully
in
the
spec.
We'll
probably
want
to
figure
this
out
right,
because
there
will
be
some
weirdness.
We
want
to
make
sure
if
you're,
using
dockerfiles
that
you're
fully
in
compliance
with
sorry
when
we're
ready
to
graduate
from
experimental,
and
we
have
stack
removal
in
our
other
spec
or
so
non-experimental
spec
right.
C
We
want
to
make
sure
that
they
can
play
like
be
fully
compliant
right,
if
you're,
using
docker
files
to
be
fully
compliant
with
the
rest
of
the
spec,
but
that
time
has
not
come
yet,
and
so
because
I've
been
focusing
on
just
getting
something
out
with
docker
files.
I
have
not
cared
to
pick
it
up
yet,
but
if
we
get
to
that
point
and
no
one
else
has
picked
it
up,
I
will
pick
it
up.
D
I
agree,
I
think,
if
it's
just
switching
the
base
image,
it
shouldn't
require
stack
id
removal
and
data
like
just
switching
the
base
image
on
based
on
buildback
outputs,
I
think,
is
good
enough
value
proposition
for
the
next
release
like
if
I
don't
wanna
like
there's
no
rush
for
this,
for
the
next
release
so
like.
If
you
want
to
find
a
time
where
more
people
are
there,
wait.
A
I
think,
given
this
complicated
tangle
of
dependencies,
the
priorities
that
I
think
we're
enacting
in
the
real
world
or
that
we
care
about
docker
files,
then
stack
removal
and
the
distribution
changes
are
more
cosmetic
and
less
causing
problems
in
the
real
world.
So
I
would
feel
comfortable
just
you
know
icing
the
distribution
changes
until
we
sort
out
the
first
two
and
then
maybe
we
could
deal
with
moving
things
between
apis
separately
after
we've
already
put
stack
removal
in
in
its
existing
place.
B
Yeah,
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
I
just
want
to
take
advantage
of
being
in
the
same
place
together.
Even
if
it's
not
everyone
like,
I
feel
like
some
difficulties,
natalie
has
expressed
that
I
fail
to
do,
is
just
just
trying
to
get
the
ball
rolling,
because
I
think
stack.
Removal
will
not
be
a
thing
we
will
solve
even
at
like
a
cube
count
eu
right,
but
I
I
think
it's
a
thing.
We
have
to
make
conscious
effort
to
kind
of
continue
to
push
independent
of
even
the
file
stuff.
B
Like
I
it's,
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
probably
it's
a
very
big
backwards,
breaking
change,
kind
of
thing,
so.
A
A
B
B
And
move
on
to
rfcs
in
the
last
five
minutes.
B
Are
these
two?
I
know
I
had
my
name
on
this.
Are
you
still
planning
on
merging
this
one
emily
when
I
pawned
it
off
on
you
yeah,
I'm
sorry.
I
forgot
to.
B
Are
there
any
of
these?
We
want
to
talk
about.
B
And
get
what
the
sound
says
now:
sport
dark
files-
that's
that's
still
moving
along.
It
sounds
like
with
implantation
and
stuff.
I
definitely
not
checked
this
one.
Do
you
know
what,
where
we
stand
on
this.
B
E
Tried
to
recall
no,
I
think
I
made
a
call
for
the
original
author
to
see
where
their
mindset
was
at.
B
B
Do
we
want
to
close
this
at
some
some
ttl
point
of?
If
we
do
not
hear
back
or
is
it
something
we
want
to
take
over.
E
From
a
project
priority
standpoint,
I
don't
know
that
we've
heard
a
lot
of
requests
for
this
other
than
the
original
author,
so
I
would
be
in
favor
of
a
ttl
to
close.
B
Okay,
I
think
joe
is
potentially
interested
in
that,
so
maybe
I
will.
B
D
B
Yep
yeah,
we
could
probably
also
tweet
some
stuff
out-
is
joe,
the
one
who
has
access
to
that
twitter
account.