►
From YouTube: Platform Sync: 2021-06-16
Description
Meeting notes: https://bit.ly/38pal2Z
A
B
B
You
will
be,
you
will
be
still
hosting
these
meetings
right,
even
you're,
not
in
the
cmb.
Okay,.
A
A
All
right,
as
far
as
status
updates,
I
can
go
on
my
part
and
say
that
there
really
hasn't
been
a
lot.
I've
been
focusing
on
on
the
platform
side
of
things.
There
is
one
thing
that
I'm
looking
for
volunteers
and
that
is
the
build
kit
stuff
right.
So
the
build
kit
kind
of
hit
some
implementation
details
in
regards
to
the
life
cycle,
changes,
and
so
at
this
point
I
don't
really
have
the
time
to
focus
on
it.
A
So
I'm
looking
around
to
see
if
anybody
could
take
it
on-
and
you
know
I'll-
just
transfer,
whatever
knowledge
and
branches
and
pieces
of
work
there.
B
Okay-
and
there
are
some-
there
are
some
issues
ending
to
be
solved-
features
to
be
added,
something
that
it's
already
documented.
A
For
build
kit,
it's
more
of
a
exploration
right
now:
it's
exploring
what
possible
integration
there
can
be
between
the
lifestyle
and
build
kit
itself
right,
and
I
think
to
be
clear.
This
is
what
would
enable
you
to
be
able
to
do
docker,
build
and-
and
it
would
just
work
right-
it
would
just
use
clarinetic
book
packs
behind
the
scenes.
A
A
B
Not
not
really,
I
believe
I
believe
I
yeah,
I
believe
the
ticket
that
the
issue
I
was
doing
for
pac
was
already
merged,
should
be
ready.
Yeah
yeah,
the
group
id
adding
the
group
maybe
flag
to
the
command
line
too.
Yes,
that
that's
that's
all
I
did
related
to
the
platform
stuff,
so
I
believe
that
was
already
measured.
It's
ready
to
to
go
so
I
don't
know
when
will
be
released,
that
one
should
be
probably
the
next
thing
we
should
talk
here
with
the
british
planning.
A
So
let
me
see
what
looks
appropriate
there.
A
I
would
say
wednesday:
the
14th
would
be
a
pretty
decent
date,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
set
that
as
the
due
date
for
the
milestone
of
o20.
B
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Next
item
is,
I
don't
know
how
much
we'd
be
able
to
do
here,
but
there
is
a
discussion
going
on
about
some
of
the
permission
changes
based
on
a
pr
where
we
made
the
workspace
configurable,
meaning
that
you
could
point
to
a
different
location
or
place
it
in
a
different
location
as
miners
and
one
of
dan's
changes
was
to
include
the
root
directory,
the
workspace
directory
in
the
tar
file,
and
because
of
that,
I
believe,
is
the
reason
why
the
permissions
are
also
changing.
A
A
I
think
that's
where
we're
at
right.
Now,
I'm
not
entirely
sure
what
other
things
we
can
do
to
move
this
along.
B
A
There
was
no
issue
created
just
a
slack
thread.
What
I
did
do
is
I
commented
on
the
pr
itself,
so
there
is
that,
but
yeah
I
do
wonder
if,
if
an
issue
would
be
the
appropriate
way
to
go
about
it,.
A
A
A
All
right-
and
the
last
thing
I
added
to
the
agenda-
was
this
discussion,
which
started
today
about
basically
limits.
A
I
don't
know
how
much
insight
or
knowledge
you
have
of
linux,
but
basically
there's
s
e
linux
right,
which
is
a
kind
of
security
feature
within
linux,
where
you
know
you
can
have
very-
or
I
guess,
more
complex,
robust
policies
and
one
of
the
things
that
the
somewhat
like
typical
default
settings
for
hd
linux
prevent
pack
from
properly
binding
to
the
docker
socket,
which
it
uses
to
kind
of
integrate
with
the
dr
damon
right
and
do
that
in
the
container.
A
So
there
there
is
a
route
in
which
users
could
customize
the
policy
or
like
set
it
properly
or
like
overall,
just
disable
se
se
linux,
which
I
think
is
probably
like
the
worst
option
right
and
one
of
the
possible.
So
I
think
there's
three
options:
option.
One
is
disable
sc
linux
option.
Two
is
create
a
policy
to
allow
pac
to
get
access
to
the
docker
data.
A
That's
like
a
user
burden
and
then
option
three
is
make
it
so
that
pack
itself
kind
of
disables
sd
linux,
for
this
particular
container
in
when
we're
seeing
this
particular
container,
it
would
be
the
containers
that
need
dr
damon
access
right.
So
we're
thinking
like
the
analyzer,
the
exporter
and
what
is
the
other
one
and
creator
right.
A
So
the
fix
itself
seems
very
simple
and
I
I
feel
comfortable,
especially
given
that
the
the
linux
experts
right
in
this
thread.
I
also
agree
with
that.
A
Yeah
and
then,
with
the
caveat
that,
if
you
know
there
is
somebody,
that's
more
securely
conscious
or
wants
granular
control,
then
we
can
discuss
adding
the
flag
to
be
able
to
toggle
that
feature
on
or
off
anyway,
that's
more
or
less
the
the
context
there
again.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
opinions
or
thoughts
on
that.
B
A
Yeah,
so
I
you
know,
I
kind
of
left
it
open
for
that,
hopefully
them
to
create
the
pr
but
yeah
without
david
to
see
if
he
has
any
opinions
there.
A
B
No,
no
on
the
back
side,
not
really,
I
think,
yeah
not
for
now,
honestly,
I
think
it's
okay
to
leave
it
like
this.