►
From YouTube: CNB Team Leads Sync
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
So
I
added
some
stuff
to
the
documents.
Basically
for
docker
files.
The
story
is
the
same.
As
the
last
few
weeks
we
got
some
good
feedback
and
working
group
on
some
of
the
like
remaining
open
questions
that
were
brought
up
in
the
rfc.
C
Yeah,
let
me
let
me
okay,
yes,
oh
here
we
are
okay
here
yeah,
so
nothing
really
more
to
say
about
docker
files
except
please
go
review.
Those
are
like
the
open
pr's,
because
I
think
that
I've
all
the
changes
you
know
that
we
talked
about
have
made
their
way
into
github.
So
I
would
love
if
everyone
could
give
their
approval
and
just
a
quick
update
that
we're
working
on
pack
the
pack
changes
that
are
required.
C
A
Thanks
natalie,
that
sounds
great.
Should
we
move
on
to
bat
team.
D
Yeah
I,
the
skeleton
for
the
profile
pack
is
ready.
I
spoke
with
gabe
yesterday
and
he
is
going
to
create
a
pr
with
the
implementation.
Hopefully
this
week.
A
C
A
E
Yeah
just
trying
to
squash
some
bugs
on
the
repo
are
some
issues
on
the
repo
and
we've
got
the
two
videos
that
demonstrate
using
pack
with
on
a
python
project
and
a
node.js
project
that
we
surfaced
on
the
chat.
E
Any
feedback
on
those
would
be
great
because
we
want
to
put
those
up
so
that
people
see
them
early
in
their
build
packs
journey.
So
they
can
see
precisely
what
we
do.
A
A
You
have
that
new
rfc
about
stack
upgrades
natalie.
Is
that
something
you'd
like
to
like
intro
to
everyone
tomorrow
in
the
working
group.
A
A
A
Who
has
access
to
fix
the
team
up?
That's
the
next
thing
I
put
on
this,
so
we
can
assign
someone
to
fix
the
calendar.
B
B
Yeah,
I
can't
find
it
in
one
password,
so
I've
done.
D
B
I
can
take
a
look
at
it.
If
not,
I
will
reach
out
for
help.
A
This
next
attract
an
agenda
item
came
out
of
our
discussion,
as
we
were
all
mingling
around
before
the
meeting.
Do
we
want
to
schedule
a
separate
toc
public,
toc
meeting,
probably
at
a
less
frequent
cadence,
or
are
we
happy
with
this
leads
channel
being
the
forum
to
have
those
discussions.
B
A
I
think,
maybe
part
of
the
reason
I'm
warm
on
the
idea
is
sort
of
in
this
governance.
Refactor
we've
done
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
thought
in
sort
of
like
how
team
leads
roles
have
changed
and
what
responsibilities
we're
delegating.
But
I
don't
know
if
we
spent
as
much
time
talking
about
what
responsibilities
we've
retained
as
the
toc
and
what
efforts
we
want
to
lead
like
if
we've
assigned
ourselves
in
governance,
you
know
stewardship
of
the
road
map
or
stewardship
of
sort
of
like
broad
categories
like.
F
F
The
kind
of
longer
term
right,
I
think
it
would
be-
you
know,
easier
to
find
time,
and
also
you
know
something
that
I
could.
A
Practical
at
times
like
you
know,
we
need
to
do
things
like
set
the
working
group
agenda
and
you
know,
go
through
status,
updates
and
stuff
like
that,
and
I
think
more
strategic
stuff.
It's
sometimes
not
clear
where
the
right
place
for
that
is
like
sometimes
we're
shoehorning
it
into
the
last
five
minutes
here.
But
it's
not
a
great
fit
or
we're
trying
to
do
in
the
private
meeting.
Maybe
it
should
be
public
just
because
that's
where
time
exists.
B
I
think
once
a
month
is
probably
a
good
starting
point.
I
guess
my
concern
is:
do
we
actually
have
stuff
we
want
to
talk
about
at
that
cadence
I
mean
to,
I
guess
the
steven's
point
of
like
trying
to
be
more
strategic
and
think
about
long-term
things.
I
do
find
there's
value,
at
least
in
this
meeting,
at
least
in
the
first
part
of
just
not
needing
to
go
to
all
the
I
guess
like
sub
team,
or
I
guess
we'll
call
something,
but
the
other
syncs
and
kind
of
just
getting
status
updates.
B
I
guess
I
feel
a
little
selfish
in
that
respect,
that
I
get
to
leverage
other
people's
kind
of
time
and
effort
in
that
sense,
and
so
having
some
flow
of.
I
wouldn't
want
to
repeat
that
necessarily
in
a
toc
meeting,
but
I
imagine
if,
for
instance,
you
are
not
attending
these
weekly
ones
and
just
attending
the
monthly
ones
because
of
time
or
whatever
constraints
it
might
be
harder
to
connect,
I
think,
to
some
degree
the
longer
term
in
the
day-to-day
strategy.
B
So
that's
the
thing
I
think
we'll
have
to
figure
out
how
to
solve
for
that
case,
but
I
I
do
think
like
road
map
and
things
are
emily's
point
things
that
get
shoved
into
the
last
five
minutes
of
these
30
minute
meetings
and
just
is
not
enough
time,
like
we've,
had
in
our
agenda
right
to
like
review
the
road
map
once
a
quarter
or
whatever,
and
that
just
never
happens
right,
so
I
think
creating
space.
So
that
would
be
good.
A
F
B
Yeah,
do
you
have
concerns
about
trying
to
set
a
room
up
for
the
two's
evening
with
a
monthly
cadence,
though,
like
I
feel
like
it's
probably
one
of
those
things
where
maybe
you
kick
it
off
at
the
toc
meeting,
but
there's
probably
hopefully
more
frequent
cadence
until
it
gets
done?
It's
not
like
it's
the
end
of
the
year.
We've
now
finally
established
the
roadmap.
B
A
Good
cadence
for
checking
in
on
an
established
roadmap
yeah
we'll
probably
need
to
schedule
some
sort
of
one-off
right.
I
think
in
the
past,
we've
had
to
do
a
longer
working
session,
but
we
can
at
least
like
this
will
at
least
give
us
a
place
to
start
that
conversation
figure
out
what
to
do
with
the
roadmap
is
the
first
agenda
item
and
then
more
things
might
need
to
get
scheduled
after
that.
F
We
could
start
bi-weekly
on
the
toc
meeting
instead
of
monthly.
That
would
give
us
more
of
a
cadence
to
deal
with
the
road
map.
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
mind
doing
it
a
little
more
often.
B
F
F
More
of
the
execution
like
this
rfc
that
rfc
right
and
focus
on,
but
you
know
still,
you
know,
contribute
at
the
high
level
right
focus
on
bigger
technical
decisions
and
things
like
that,
and
so
I
think
it
bi-weekly
and
I
attend
that
meeting
and
attend
less
of
the
other.
Other
things
would
be
good
monthly
and
I
still
pop
into
some
of
the
other
ones,
but
also
be
good.
F
So
it's
not
a
not
a
strong
preference,
but
maybe
I'd
lean
a
little
towards
the
bi-weekly
so
that
I'm
not
sometimes
showing
up
to
something
and
sometimes
not,
and
you
know
having
people
pick
up
something
and
then
expect
me
to
be
there
and
then
worry
that
I'm
not
there
if
that
makes
sense.
A
It's
always
easier
easier
to
cancel
meetings
than
to
schedule
them,
so
maybe
we
just
carve
out
the
bi-weekly
time
and
then
we
can
reduce
it.
If
we
want
to.
F
A
D
B
Yeah,
I'm
fine
with
bi-weekly.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
one.
It's
the
right,
cadence
and
then
two
that
it's
not.
We
show
up
every
other
week
and
it's
like
awkward
silence
right
because
there
isn't
stuff
to
talk
about.
So
I
don't
think
we'll
have
that
problem,
but.