►
From YouTube: Working Group: 2021-01-27
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
C
I
could
speak
to
that.
We
cut
a
life
cycle,
0
10
2
on
monday,
with
a
small
patch
for
a
race
condition
in
the
detector
and
also
bumps
ggcr,
but
as
for
our
work
on
the
next
milestone,
zero,
eleven
zero,
that's
just.
A
A
A
D
A
Sounds
good
move
analyze
phase
before
detect.
A
D
Yeah,
I
think
this
just
needs
people
to
review
and
read
it.
I
know
his
emily
commented
on.
A
It
move
layer,
types
to
new
table
and
layer
tunnel.
C
We
marked
this
one
as
fcp
last
week
because
it
had,
I
guess,
enough
votes.
There
was
still
an
outstanding
question
that
I
responded
to
and
I'm
hoping
can
be
marked
out
of
scope.
But
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
update
that
before
merging.
C
It's
right
above
right
here
on
the
on
standardizing
labels
in
the
image
I
kind
of
raised
that
as
a
question
when
the
rfc
potentially
included
renaming
the
keys.
But
if
we're
cutting
that
out,
I
don't
well
just
for
the
what
I
stated
in
the
comment.
I
don't
see
the
real
pressing
need
to
mess
with
that,
especially
because
it
has
some
backwards
compatibility
like
significance.
D
B
A
What
next
thing
is
group
additions
to
the
builder
order
from
joe.
A
D
A
Sounds
good,
there
are
two
drafts
and
then
the
last
one
is
offline,
build
packages
and
fcp.
Is
this
one
ready
to
merge.
A
E
I
the
it
may
not
be
a
miss.
Can
you
scroll
to
the
top?
For
me,
it's
joe's
name
issues
need
to
be
opened
for
it
before
it
can
exit
out
of
fcp.
E
That
for
the
fact
that
it
has
happened,
yes,
but
it's
the
sherpa's
responsibility
to
open
the
issues
not
to
do
the
work,
but
at
least
to
open
any
like
issues
for
individual
specs
and
the
versions
that
they
need
to
go
against.
And
then
the
merge
rfc
script
asks
you
for
those
numbers
and
does
all
of
the
right
things
with
them.
E
Yeah,
like
alternately
dan,
I
think
you
could
just
open
those
issues
in
the
spec
repo
for
him
and
then
contact
anyone
yeah
to
get
it
all
closed
down.
A
Should
I
add,
I
don't
think
this
should
I
add
more
labels.
E
There,
because
it
it's
not
adjustments
to
any
of
the
other
specs
is
it.
I
don't.