►
From YouTube: CNCF CI Working Group - 2018-04-24
Description
Join us for KubeCon + CloudNativeCon in Barcelona May 20 - 23, Shanghai June 24 - 26, and San Diego November 18 - 21! Learn more at https://kubecon.io. The conference features presentations from developers and end users of Kubernetes, Prometheus, Envoy and all of the other CNCF-hosted projects.
C
D
C
C
D
D
C
D
Sounds
good:
where
did
you
say
you
heard
about
the
call.
D
I'm
the
mailing
list-
okay,
probably
sounds
good,
but
right
now
this
is
twice
monthly.
The
second
fourth
Tuesday
we
may
be
adjusting
either
the
time
or
frequency
depending
on
attendance
and
stuff.
Sometimes
we
have
and
like
well
a
good
number
of
people,
and
sometimes
it
can
be
just
feel
like
this
will
see.
B
B
A
B
D
Let's
go
in
here
so
we've
had.
We
had
a
call
with
beniker,
looking
at
potentially
using
a
spinning
spinnaker
as
an
alternative
to
get
lab
for
the
runners,
how
we,
where
we
run
everything
for
doing
the
deploys
and
provisioning
everything
and
splitting
off
that
portion
of
the
code,
so
that
we
could
sit
on
top
of
anything
that
could
provide
that
part
of
the
cross
cloud
project
as
well
as
talking
with
vmware
and
oracle
oracle
is
looking
at
helping
with
adding
their
cloud,
which
is
nice.
D
We
added
a
modal
on
the
front
Crona
dashboard.
We've
also
made
some
of
the
the
rest
of
the
source
code
public,
so
the
Brennan
and
dashboard
itself
in
the
status
repository
I,
move
those
over
and
got
everything
in
place
split
some
of
the
coda
and
those
are
now
up
there
in
public.
So
that's
good.
It's
been
a
lot
of
feedback
on
that
and
that
may
be
something
at
cube.
D
As
far
as
the
issues
are
saying,
we
may
have
figured
out
what's
going
on
with
the
allocations,
it
seems
like
something
with
their
API
when
you're
doing
a
lot
of
requests.
At
the
same
time,
you
were
saw
that,
while
adding
110
support
for
kubernetes,
so
that's
in
progress
were
nearly
done
with
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
around
certificates
and
how
authorization
is
handled,
the
our
vac
support
in
Cuba,
Nettie's,
110
and
so
updating
everything
the
templates
to
support
that
it's
all
backwards
compatible.
D
So
we
keep
supporting
older
versions,
but
just
adding
in
that
support
and
finding
differences
on
how
the
different
providers
work
like
the
OpenStack
side
with
sexist
some
DNS
things
there
IBM
cloud
what
we're
doing
there
so
once
that's
in
place,
then
we
should
be
good
for
all
the
110
like,
and
this
was
rich.
I
went
110
0
and
it
looks
good
for
110
1
as
well.
So
the
onf
integration
that
one's
actually
and
looks
good
right
now,
I
believe
that
was
green
as
of
this
morning
and
pull
that
up.
D
So
that's
that
supporting
the
upstream
changes
for
their
head
release
and
it
looks
green
on
the
provision
on
the
providers
that
passed.
We
were
able
to
go
through
so
we'll.
Let
them
know
today
that
that
was
fixed.
So
that's
an
integration
update
with
a
change
on
their
build
server.
So
there
we
go
so
we
will
be
in
Copenhagen
for
Q
Khan
doing
the
intro
and
deep
dives
have
been
preparing
for
that
trying
to
make
the
deep
dive
relevant
tool.
We've
been
hearing
from
the
cube
from
the
community.
D
B
D
Working
with
community
for
the
Indian
Test
and
we
are
hoping
to
gather
a
lot
of
feedback
over
the
next
two
weeks
for
what
cross
Club.
This
project
should
look
like
going
forward,
including
the
API
that
we're
working
on
making
available
so
the
SS
status
repository
and
making
that
most
useful
for
other
projects
to
integrate,
with
for
both
submitting
feedback
as
submitting
status
and
other
information
via
the
API,
as
well
as
pulling
information.
D
C
Terms
of
the
number
of
providers
you
have
is:
are
you?
Is
the
working
group
happy
with
the
number
of
providers,
or
is
there
a
wish
to
expand
it
to
more
clouds?
The
reason
asked
is
before
this
job
I
used
to
run
the
public
cloud
business
that
Ubuntu
so
I
have
I,
have
a
decent
network
of
clouds
inside
the
US
and
outside
the
US
I'm
happy
to
help.
Isn't
that
a
thing.
D
Yeah,
so
we
do
want
to
add
more
clouds
and
having
I
guess,
community
contributed
or
provider
contributed
is
nicest
so
that
we
could
add
more
sooner
so
OpenStack
was
95
percent,
contributed
by
the
some
folks
at
open
sack
on
the
Trinity
and
Oracle
cloud
looks
like
that.
Maybe
another
big
one
that's
contributed
so
anything
there
would
be
the
big
help.
B
Contacts
at
all
the
CN
CF
member
companies,
which
essentially
represent
all
the
biggest
public
clouds
and
and
distres
as
well,
and
so
are
issues
more
about
resources
of
of
trying
to
get
folks
to
do
the
work
as
opposed
to
us.
Have
it
to
do
it
because
you
know,
if
you
look
at
that,
chart
we're
both
trying
to
expand
to
the
right
by
adding
more
clouds
and
all
sorts
down
by
adding
more
projects.