►
From YouTube: CNCF Contributor Strategy Governance WG 2021-03-16
Description
CNCF Contributor Strategy Governance WG 2021-03-16
C
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
C
A
C
A
Absolutely
so
I
did
get
some
good
feedback
from
dems,
which
I
think
I've
incorporated
most
of
that
the
so
the
direction
I
decided
to
go
with
this
was
looking
looking
around.
So
none
of
the
graduated
projects
have
a
quote
charter
document,
but
what
they
do
have
is
they
have
those
components,
and
so
what
what
I
tried
to
do
was
steer
people
towards
including
certain
things
in
their
documentation.
A
So
with
the
idea
that,
having
you
know
having
some
of
this
like
a
scope
and
a
mission,
helps
avoid
issues
and
misunderstandings.
Later
people
don't
actually
understand
what
you
do
and
there's
also
lots
of
complexity,
overlapping
technologies.
That
sort
of
thing
so
so
this
helps
people
fit
their
project
into
the
overall
ecosystem
and
what
functionality
it
has
and
it
doesn't
have.
What
are
they
trying
to
do
and
not
do
so.
A
A
B
B
I
don't
think
I
would
use
the
same
words
here
like
I'm,
I'm
struggling
with
being
able
to
call
it
a
project
charter
because,
like
as
we've
seen,
it's
not
called
a
charter
at
all
and
it
doesn't
follow
the
same
kind
of
thing
and
being
able
to
set
the
expectation
that
will
have
the
same
level
of
robustness
as
the
big
charters
like
the
cncf
charter
and
the
sig
charters
is
probably
not
something
that
a
tiny
little
baby
project
is
going
to
be
able
to
like
meet
those
goals.
Yeah
do
we
have.
A
A
A
A
I
think
another
one
too
yeah
yeah
this
is
this?
Isn't
the
one
I'm
thinking
of
there
was
another
one
that
was
really
good,
that
I
will
dig
up.
That
was
a
very
much
a
technical
scope.
It
was
this
project.
Does
these
things
and
not
these
things,
and
it
was.
It
was
quite
well
written
I'll,
dig
up
an
example.
B
C
B
D
A
C
I'm
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
can
see
it
being
in
either
place
so
yeah
the
I
mean
it's.
It's
kind
of
traded
because,
like
for
some
of
the
stuff,
like
I've,
just
been
working
on
conveyors
governance
document
again
and
for
conveyor,
they
really
need
scope
to
be
part
of
the
governance
documentation
because
that's
where
the
procedure
is
on
accepting
new
sub
projects
are
and
that's
when
you
really
need
to
know
scope
yeah
via,
but
for
other
projects.
C
A
A
C
I'd
like
to
actually
spell
out
the
sort
of
three
different
sections
that
we've
identified
so
mission,
scope
and
values
and
principles
to
to
explain
what
those
are
because
right.
This
is
the
advisory
document
right
yep
and
it's
going
to
accompany
the
changes
that
we
make
to
the
templates,
and
so
explanations
are
in
order.
C
C
C
A
B
A
E
E
B
A
C
A
A
C
A
A
C
C
C
C
A
C
Bm,
oh
well,
how
long
have
I
had
the
the
initial
bullet
point
version
of
the
definition
of
open
governance
sitting
in
a
hackmd
document,
yeah,
true,
so
the
okay
and
speaking
of
long-term
things.
I
have
finally
gotten
all
comments
incorporated
into
the
subprojects
template
so,
if
possible,
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
vote
to
merge
that
it
has
been
reviewed
by
sod
not
by
our
new
tse
liaison.
C
A
C
A
C
C
C
A
C
So
yeah,
and
I'm
just
saying
the
other
two,
the
other
two
did
not
quite
get
the
same
level
of
scrutiny,
which
probably
means
that
they
could
use
it
at
some
point
down
the
line.
Okay,
the
so
I
mean
the
two
are
in
some
ways:
less
complicated
or
have
more
field
examples
right,
because,
like
steering
committee
elections,
we
have
lots
and
lots
of
examples
of
the
and-
and
you
know,
maintainer
council
is
not
that
complicated
of
a
model
plus.
A
B
B
D
Okay
time
zones:
okay,
I
mean,
like
the
day
daylight
savings
time
zones
yeah.
I
expected
that
this
hour
this
meeting
will
start
in
a
few
in
half
an
hour.
So
keller
was
waiting
for
my
review
on
the
website.
I
completed
it
last
week
and
let's
check
if
anything
else
is
there,
but
as
far
as
she
had
to
address
a
few
minor
issues,
then
that's
it.