►
Description
CNCF SIG Contributor Strategy-Contributor Growth WG 2020-09-15
B
C
E
F
A
A
So
I
can
see
my
friends
even
though
I
don't
work
at
the
same
company
so
for
the
agenda
like
I
didn't
want
to
like
guilt-trip
people
and
like
dig
through
what
people
said
they
were
working
on
two
months
ago
or
whatever
I'd
rather
talk
about.
If
people
have
spoons
or
forks
or
cutlery
to
work
on
something
now
and
it's
okay
to
say
no
and
what
that
is
like.
I
had
time
today,
which
was
really
exciting
to
finally
open
that
pr.
A
A
C
C
This
is
like
the
advice
that
we
would
give
to
any
project.
That
would
that's
interested
in
the
whole
like
well,
who
takes
care
of
my
people
and
how
do
we
do
this
element?
Someone
started
that
and
then
I'm
also
going
to
start
on
recruiting
contributors
document
just
some
like
high
level
stuff
there,
because
there's
a
lot
of
resources
and
then
also
like
all
the
stuff
in
our
heads,
but
that's
it
for
me.
C
D
A
D
C
Know
I
was
kind
of
hoping
that,
like
bogdan,
could
could
like
come
school
us
on
that
part,
because
I
feel
like
we're
all
kind
of
like
batman
in
the
dark,
but
we're
all
like
this
sounds
great
so
anyway,
I'm
sorry
to
get
off
topic
that
just
excites
the
hell
out
of
me
out
of
everything
that
we're
doing
on
the
governance
side.
I
don't
know
why,
but
when
I
saw
that
I
was
like
so
anyway,
all
right.
A
A
What
I
want
to
do
is
take
what
I
had
there
and
kind
of
take
some
of
the
other
things
that
jennifer
and
I
have
been
working
on
for
porter
and
putting
that
up
at
the
cncf
level
somewhere
and
just
open
a
pr,
and
then
I
don't
know
like
the
google
doc
things.
I
think
it's
stalled
really
easy
because
they
get
piled
on
with
a
lot
of
things
that
aren't
immediately
actionable.
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
was
thinking
a
very
similar
because
watching
your
experience
and
and
josh's
experience,
I
was
thinking
the
same
thing
of
more
like
well.
Let
me
pr
the
framework
of
the
doc
in
so
people
get
like
where
we're
gonna
go
with
this
yeah
and
then
like
we
all
just
kind
of
collaboratively
fill
in
the
holes
together.
C
That's
where
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
thinking
too
just
based
on
like
because
it
also
it's
just
a
lot
of
information,
a
review
too.
So
it's
almost
like
you
know
like
giving
somebody
some
large
code
piece.
So
it's
like
because
you
want
like,
as
I'm
a
reviewer
like,
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
giving
you
my
whole
time.
C
A
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
I
understood
why
we
originally
thought
we
wanted
to
do
it
that
way,
yeah
of
course,
but
having
gone
through
it.
I
know
for
me
personally:
it's
not
it's
not
working.
It
makes
me
feel
really
stuck
yeah,
you
know,
so
I'm
gonna
try
something
different
awesome.
I
hope
people
are
okay
with
it.
Yeah.
C
A
C
C
A
A
D
We
do
not
want
to
pre-record
it
whether
or
not
we
will
get
that
option
is
another
question
entirely
because
it
only
occurred
to
me
after
I
submitted
it
that
what
I
submitted
will
work
very
poorly
as
a
pre-recorded
thing,
because
what
we
need
to
do
is
we
need
to
find
out
who's
in
the
audience
right.
I'm
expecting
a
small
audience
for
this,
because
the
only
appropriate
audience
are
basically
project
leads
for
cnc
of
projects
or
projects
that
want
to
join
cncf.
A
D
D
C
C
A
E
E
D
D
C
A
One
I'm
happy
to
talk
to
anybody
about
anything
but
we'll
just
prioritize,
what's
relevant
to
the
talk
at
hand.
Yeah,
you
know
that's
fine
and
I
think
also,
let's
not
be
afraid
to
redirect
people
to
the
right
thing.
I
mean
we
have
so
many
different
forums
for
talking
to
people
who
are
interested
about
engaging
with
the
community
that
the
fact
that
they
show
up
means
are
interested,
let's
just
find
the
right
way
to
like
keep
them
talking
to
us
in
some
appropriate
fashion.
A
A
A
D
Okay,
can
I
ask
you
something
on
a
completely
different
topic,
of
course,
for
governance.
I'm
currently
working
on
the
section
of
that
sort
of
a
summary
of
here
are
all
the
bits
of
paperwork
that
your
project
needs
to
have
in
a
general
sense,
yeah,
and
I
wanted
to
find
out
which
ones
of
these
somebody
in
contributor
growth
was
working
on.
So
I
can
just
stub
those
out
and
say
link
to
link
to
other
document
here.
A
D
A
E
C
A
Yeah
we
we
made
the
assumption
for
when
I
wrote
that
contributing
guide
that
it
was
somewhere
on
the
readme
and
we
just
kind
of
like
hand
waved
if
there's
an
official
like
it's
always
going
to
be
in
x
document
that'd
be
helpful,
because
then
we
could
just
link
to
something
called.
You
know
comms.md
or
whatever.
It
is
okay.
D
C
D
Okay,
so
that's
one
that
we
need
to
generate
yeah
and
one
of
the
I
mean
honestly.
My
main
point
in
that
is
whatever
your
release
process
is.
It
should
be
written
down
yeah,
which
is
for
two
reasons.
One
is
for
managing
expectations
and
the
second
reason
is,
you
know:
people
leave
and
I
cannot
tell
you
the
number
of
projects
I
have
been
on
where
you
know,
release
x
was
delayed
for
six
months,
because
nobody
knew
how
to
build
the
packages
so
yeah
do
you
want.
D
Yeah,
the
I
don't
have
a
strong
opinion,
I
mean
yeah.
Eventually
I
I
mean
I
think
the
template
should
be
the
templates.
The
templates
aren't
really
contributor
growth
is
writing
more
of
the
templates,
but
the
templates
aren't
like
a
specific
working
group.
You
follow
me
yep.
That's
fine,
because,
like
we're
going
to
be
writing
templates
for
these
purely
governance,
things
like
leadership,
selection,
the
so,
but
also
I
want
for
each
one
of
these.
I
want
some
narrative
in
a
template.
E
C
D
C
Because,
like
a
template
could
be
like,
you
know,
one
step
talk
to
cncf
about
xyz
thing.
You
know
they
can
help
you
with
this.
You
know
number
two,
you
know
do
xy
like
that
kind
of
thing,
so
I
think
that's
where
people
get
lost
with
the
like,
where
cncf
can
come
in
because
they
can
actually
come
in
everywhere.
It
seems
like
in
like,
but
in
weird
ways
and
like
they'll,
only
do
so
much
in
like
I
mean-
and
I
don't
mean
this
in
any
negative
way
by
the
way
by
recording.
A
This
seems
to
be
pretty
standard
and
she
goes
through
like
pretty
exhaustively
like
everything
that
needs
to
happen
all
the
documents
how
trademark
works?
What
are
all
the
services
that
cncf
offers?
How
to
study?
That's
all
new
and
awesome,
so
yeah,
and
so
it's
like
I
mean
obviously
after
our
sig
has
created
more
content,
we'll
be
more
involved
in
this
and
it'll
be
start
referencing,
our
templates,
but
I
don't
know
like
this.
This
is
actually
incredibly
helpful,
yeah
and
understand
what
projects
there
are
and
what
they
can
offer
and
like.
A
C
No,
no,
no,
I'm
just
saying
like
in
areas
where
we
can
highlight
or
should
highlight
like
we
can
like
even
like
you
know,
like
the
recruiting
contributors
doc
like
people,
don't
know
that
you
know
they'll
pay
for
certain,
like
services
or
or
whatnot,
or
even
contractors
in
certain
cases.
So
it's
just
kind
of
like
just
informing
them
of
hey
talk
to
you
know,
don't
forget
to
talk
to
you,
know
amy
or
your
cncf
rep,
about
what
they
could
do
for
you
or
something
like
that.
That's
all
nothing.
E
A
D
I
I
think
that
actually
makes
a
lot
of
sense
because,
like
I'm
planning
to
put
the
things
into
the
individual
sections
where
they
make
sense,
but
it
would
be
super
useful
to
also
have
hey
here's,
this
list
of
things
that
cncf
does
yeah.
You
know
and
here's
a
link
to
the
current
course
on
cncf
services,
yep.
D
E
C
Like
read
this
documentation,
so
that's
why
it's
cool
if
it's
like
hey
by
the
way.
This
is
also
now
like
a
service
of
cncf
or
something
like
where
we
can.
I'm
not
saying,
and
I'm
not
saying
that
we're
pushing
that
it's
just
if
there's,
if
there's
ever
any
point
in
like
our
templates
or
whatever,
where
we
can
like
say,
hey,
there's
extra
hands
for
you.
I
just
think
we
should
do
it.
That's
all,
especially
with
the
ambiguous
stuff.
C
A
So
the
template
repo
is
supposed
to
be
like
porter
somebody
who's
like
brand
new,
wants
to
make
something,
that's
destined
for
the
scenes
yeah,
for
they
just
want
to
follow.
Cncf
recommended
guidelines
right.
They
could
clone
this
repo
and
hopefully
not
be
deleting
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff
that
doesn't
belong
in
their
repo
going
forward
right.
They
shouldn't
be
carrying
around
copies
of
our
docs.
A
Essentially,
so
the
templates
make
sense
they
edit
and
they're
theirs
forever
right,
like
the
contributing
guide,
the
governance,
the
latter
owner
code
owners
owners
files,
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
like
our
guidance,
docs
that
they're
not
going
to
edit
and
have
nothing
to
do
with
their
project.
And
it's
really
just
our
content.
D
C
D
A
A
C
Yeah
that
would
actually
help
us
with
the
whole
idea
of
you
know
what
carolyn's
saying
of
just
pr
and
iterate.
If
we
could
just
pr
it
into
a
drafts
folder,
because
then
the
intention
is
clearly
a
draft
and
then
it
would
just
like
the
pr
would
land
and
then
I
could
you
know,
then
we
could
collaborate
on
it.
I
don't
know
yeah.
A
C
E
E
E
D
D
D
The
yeah
sorry
we
just
we
started
on
the
advice,
end
of
things
yeah
and
have
been
getting
that
knocked
out.
Rather
than
than
on
the
template
end
of
things
and
the
governance.
The
governance
template
is
going
to
be
complicated
because,
basically,
we're
going
to
have
like
six
different
ones
for
the
six
major
sort
of
governance
structures.
D
A
D
D
D
A
A
C
C
A
C
C
G
A
D
A
D
G
A
A
A
C
C
A
D
D
D
D
Did
you
pre-record
your
video
or
did
it
yeah,
in
which
case
right
like
if
that's
going
to
be
stalled?
For
some
reason,
I
can
just
put
it
up
myself.
There
you
go.
The
pre-recording
thing
is
just
so
weird
because
you
know
it's
weird
to
be
a
case
of
I'm
used
to
like
the
night.
Before
the
talk.
I
don't
do
anything
because
I'm
rehearsing
and
and
now
I'm
like-
I
did
all
that
three
weeks
ago,
I'm
just
showing
up
for
the
q
a.
D
Oh
see,
I
do
so
much
better
with
an
audience
like
one
of
the
things
they
were
like
you
know,
can
you
do
the
little
inset
video
thing
and
I'm
like?
Well,
I
really
actually
can't,
because
I
can't
do
this
talk
unless
I
get
up
and
walk
around
yeah,
I
might
actually
buy
this
little
camera
tracking
thing.
They
make
this
device
for
people
who
do
sports
that
automatically
tracks
you,
oh
yeah,
the.
A
D
A
D
A
D
It
was
fun
and
I
think
it
really
helped
people
understand
how
it
was
supposed
to
work.
This
is
back
when
postcode's
replication
was
new
and
people
really
understand
the
mechanism
right,
and
so
the
hats
showed
whether
you
were
currently
the
primary
or
a
replica
and
the
the
bungee
cords
were
network
connections
between
the
nodes
and
the
playing
cards
were
we
were
passing
around
disc
blocks.
A
D
That's
one
of
the
things
I
always
wondered
about
these
online
talks
is
okay.
How
many
of
the
people
who
are
logged
in
are
actually
listening
to
this
and
how
I'm
not
in
another
town,
yeah
yep,
the
I
mean,
because
you
always
know
I
mean
you
know
when
you're
giving
a
talk
live
right.
You've
got
that
certain
crew
who
are
in
the
back
three
rows,
reading
their
email
and
and
they're.
D
A
Know
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
affect
you
if
they're
doing
that,
so
you
can't
let
it.
I
can't
let
that
bother
me
right.
If
they're
streaming
me
and
not
listening
yeah,
it
ultimately
doesn't
hurt
me
at
all.
You
know
so
again,
I'm
always
looking
just
to
have
a
conversation
with
someone
like
that's
what
these
talks
are
for.
D
A
I
went
to
devops
state
chicago
and
they
ran
it
on
a
different
platform.
Did
you
go
or
no
okay?
They
did.
They
did
a
different
platform.
They
did,
oh,
which
I
call
discord.
I
think
so
there
was
like
breakout
rooms
for
our
channels
or
whatever
for
every
single
speaker.
I
really
like
that.
It'd
be
nice.
A
If
kubecon
could
do
that
as
well,
it
was
awkward
when
we
wanted
to
chat
in
slack
afterwards
from
a
for
a
talk
because,
like
there
was
a
channel
in
slack
for
every
track
and
like
the
community
track
was
getting
overwhelmed,
it
was
really
hard
to
be
like
no.
I
want
to
speak
about
this
topic
with
people.
A
No
one
seemed
to
understand
threads
because
slack
and
it
was
hard
to
engage
with
people
about
the
talk
after
the
talk,
you
know
what
I
mean
and
it
worked
better
when
there
was
pre-created
little
places
where
you
could
talk
for
an
hour
or
two
after
the
talk
was
over
actually
and
still
get
the
speaker
and
get
other
people
who
are
who
are
keen
to
talk
about.
I
think
we
were
talking
about
like
built.
A
community
building
in
for
was
it
devops
days
in
brazil.
A
I
was
faster
than
that
speaker
for
like
an
hour.
You
know
stuff
like
that,
whereas
you
can't
really
have
that
sustained
level
of
engagement
with
somebody
even
for
like
two
minutes
after
the
talk,
because
the
net
talk
has
started
and
and
like
three
other
talks
finished
in
that
track,
and
everyone's
talking
over
each
other
in
slack
and
you're
all
trying
to
share
the
same
channel,
which
is
hard.
D
Open
source
summit
for
linux
foundation
open
source
summit,
the
community
track
channel,
ended
up
being
its
own
thing
yeah.
It
ended
up
being
like
this
running
discussion
from
community
managers
about
stuff
that
was
going
on,
and
that
was
only
10
generally
related
to
any
of
the
talks
that
were
being
given.
A
D
C
C
C
C
G
C
C
So
anyway,
this
is
just
something
meta
that
has
been
literally
in
my
folder
for
months.
I'm
not
kidding
you
months
that
I
have
yet
to
ship
that
I
also
am
like
wow,
I'm
blocking
myself
at
this
point,
but
this
is,
if
you
all
had
it,
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
show
it
to
you
all,
because
it's
like,
if
you
have
any
thoughts
or
anything,
I
would
love
to
hear
them.
So
that's
really.
It.
A
D
A
A
C
A
I
would
say
that
when
I've
invited
people
to
contribute
to
this
with
me,
it
has
people's
hesitation
has
had
less
to
do
with
the
name.
Sig
though,
and
more
to
do
with.
People
are
interested
to
contribute
to
kubernetes,
because
they
perceive
of
value
to
like
their
resume
and
network
to
be
associated
with
kubernetes,
that
they
don't
feel
they
get
just
being
associated
with
cncf.