►
Description
CNCF SIG Contributor Strategy Contributor Growth WG 2020-01-05
A
Yeah,
I'm
I
ca.
I
I
I'm
pretty
far
along
with
the
framework,
which
is
pretty
cool
and,
as
you
know,
scott
volunteered
to
help
so
he's
gonna
interview
a
few
other
people
and
I
think
once
we
have
that
it's
already
kind
of
massive,
but
it's
good.
I
think
we
can
interviews
yet
four,
oh
cool
yeah
and
I
think
four,
let
me
see.
A
And
yeah,
I
I
think
there
is
really
good
intel
and
scott
wanted
to
speak
with
someone
from
container
d
and
prometheus.
So
I
think
that's
good.
I
just.
A
Like
the
bigger
projects
have
a
lot
more
in
so
it's
it's,
it's
good
right,
like
the
smaller
projects.
They
have
bits
and
pieces
here
that
are
interesting,
but
they're
also
just
trying
to
figure
it
out
so,
but
the
big
ones
have
already
figured
it
out
which
which
is
so
useful
to
get
their
info.
Oh
yeah,
so.
A
A
A
Yeah
yeah
and
I
think
scott
is
on
pto
still
do
you
know
that
karen
I
think
like
I
was
talking
to
him.
He
hasn't
told
me
anything
so
I
could
probably
check
let's
see
yeah,
because
I
I
pinked
him
and
he
was
going
to
me
during
his
vacation.
I
was
like
no,
no
just
take
your
vacation,
I
think
but
yeah
I
don't
know
when
he's
going
to
come
back,
but
I
think
like
yeah
once
I.
D
Wanted
to
do
kind
of
the
I
don't
think
he's
he's
like
not
online.
As
far
as
I
can
tell
on
teams,
so
he's
probably
out
yeah
yeah,
I
think
so
he
was
gonna.
Take.
A
B
B
D
As
far
as
I
can
tell
like,
I
don't
think
anything's
happened
to
the
to
like
the
file.
It's
just
kind
of
still
sitting
there.
I
don't
know
if
like
they
would
have
done
anything
on
github
or
if
it
was
more
of
just
like
approval
during
a
meeting
but
not
yeah.
No,
I
don't
think
anything's
changed.
B
C
A
D
A
And
here
I
I'm
just
wondering
what
is
the
like
wait,
because
I
don't
really
know
the
flow
and
I've
seen
that
karen
was
super
white,
like
already
in
the
almost
done
with
the
sharing.
So
we
have
it
now
in
a
google
doc,
and
I
want
to
do
like
the
what's.
It
called
the
handover
to
scott,
so
he
can
interview
his
people
and
then,
ideally,
I
think
it's
ready
to
share
it
with
other
people,
so
they
can
put
like
so
we
would
have
to
put
it
on
github
somehow.
A
B
B
Okay,
so
katherine,
what
you
would
want
to
do
is
make
something
like
that.
If
it's
a
template,
we
have
like
special
comments.
If
it's
a
pure
content
like
advisory
thing,
you
can
just
write
it
mark
down
and
not
worry
about
it.
Just
what
you
can
just
write
mark
down
and
not
have
to
worry
about.
B
We
have
like
a
special
way
of
telling
people
like
they
may
need
to
edit
one
of
their
files,
but
you
should
be
able
to
submit
it
to
that
same
spot
like
in
that
directory
the
drafts
directory
right
there,
and
that
would
give
us
a
way
to
collaborate
on
it
and
when
we're
ready
to
say
this
is
a
recommendation
and
everyone
can
look
at
it
and
there's
no
like
caveats,
like
oh.
B
Don't
look
at
it
then
we'll
do
a
pr
and
we'll
move
it
to
a
different
directory.
Okay,
cool
one
directory
up
and
just
be
like
this
is
real
content.
This
is
happening.
D
B
Does
that
make
sense,
though,
how
to
do
it?
Your
pr
doesn't
have
to
be
perfect.
People
can
iterate
on
it
and
add
their
own
things
so,
like
you
could
even
put
it
right
now
in
there
and
then
invite
scott
to
make
changes
using
his
own
pull
request
so
that
you
don't
have
to
be
like
the
aggregator
of
everyone's
comments
and
edits.
B
A
B
B
The
idea
is
that
this
would
become
contribute.cncf.io,
I'm
just
waiting
for
people
to
say
I
can
put
it
there,
and
so
we
have
one
which
is.
I
want
to
be
a
contributor,
and
this
is
the
existing
content.
That
is,
if
you
go
to
contribute
at
cncf.io.
B
The
contribution
guides
the
ecosystem
list
of
the
projects,
but
it's
now
in
the
website.
So
it's
you're
not
like.
A
B
So
if
I
click
on
incubated
here
on
the
right
hand,
side
there's
a
nav
for
all
the
headers.
D
B
We'll
be
able
to
see
some
more
projects,
cool
and
some
sandbox
projects.
This
isn't
content
that
any
of
us
wrote.
This
is
just
existing
stuff.
So
if
you
want
to
change
it,
you
can
click
edit.
This
page
and
it'll
give
you
a
chance
to
edit
it,
but
because
this
isn't
a
live
site,
yet
I
don't
recommend
doing
that
because
you'll
be
editing.
I
think
my
fork
right
now.
B
B
Sure
like
how
it
hides
chat
every
time,
you're
like
that's
the
one
button,
I
want
to
see.
Okay,
so
that's
where
that
content
is
and
then,
if
you
go
to
the
main
you
know
I
want
to
be
a
maintainer.
This
is
all
of
our
content.
B
That's
in
the
sig
contributor
strategy
repository
and
like,
for
example,
the
contributor
growth
framework
or
the
contribution
ladder
when
it's
ready,
you'll
be
able
to
find
it
on
this
when
this
is
all
up
so,
for
example,
project
health
is
one
of
ours
that
actually
is
finished,
so
you'd
be
able
to
get
things
in
here.
B
B
B
B
It
exists
she's
like
let
me
make
it
go,
live
immediately,
but
I
wasn't
really
sure
who
got
to
say
that,
because
there
is
an
existing
like
the
domain
we
want
to
use
is
an
existing
domain
yeah
and
it
points
somewhere
and
yeah.
People
have
already
demonstrated
that,
like
I,
I
can't
just
mess
with
it.
Yeah.
B
B
Yeah,
I
don't
know
I
mean
at
the
moment
that,
like
I
said
it
just
redirects
to
this
right
and
what
we
need
to
make
sure
is
that
we
don't
re,
redirect
it
to
something:
that's
broken
right.
So
it's
an
important
thing.
So
if
we
switch
it,
it
needs
to
need
to
be
done
enough
that
we
don't
move
backwards
in
terms
of
you
know,
what's
here.
B
B
Okay,
so
I'll
follow
up
with
her
today
and
figure
figure
that
out,
like,
I
imagine,
if
anything,
it's
just
a
matter
of
making
sure
it's
clearly
documented
how
to
edit
the
site
yeah.
D
B
Is
in
this
footer
here
and
it
links
to
our
trademarks
if
we
need
more
branding
than
that
to
make
it
to
uncf
cool,
I
think
the
cncf
has
got
to
pay
somebody,
because
I
I
don't
have
like
extensive.
A
B
Every
time
I've
shown
her
the
site
she's
never
been
like
this
needs
to
get
spiffed
up,
but
I'll
I'll,
I
don't
know
we'll
see.
That's,
I
think,
that's
the
thing,
because
no
one
really
understands
who
owns
a
scientist
to
make
decisions
about
it
yeah.
This
is
why
I
really
didn't
want
to
use
the
existing
domain
name
wanted
us
to
just
make
a
new
one,
but
you
know
that's
fine,
we'll
get
it
figured
out
eventually
just
moves
a
little
slower.
This
way,
I
don't
know
that's
all
I
had
so
it
sounds
like
that's.
D
E
Yeah,
so
that's
why
I'm
off
video.
B
A
A
B
A
A
Yeah
I
mean
like
there's
so
much
stuff
when
people
start
talking.
You
know
it's
like
it's
all
good.
Some
things
are
kind
of
interesting,
because
people
contradict
themselves
a
little
bit
like
different
people,
say
different
things,
so
it's
like
so
I
had
like
I
flacked
that,
and
so
we
have
to
see
how
we
address
that,
but
I
I
wanted
it
to
be
like
it's
really
like
kind
of
like
this
is
the
advice
what
people
had,
but
I
also
wanted
to
have
like
a
section.
These
are
the
tools,
efficiency
tools
that
people
use.
A
You
know
so
one
of
things
that
we
had
like.
How
do
you
make
the?
What's
it
called
the?
Oh
god?
Where
is
it?
I
forgot
the
word
that
I.
A
Anyways,
like
how
do
you
make
the
whole
thing
like
really
the
whole
flow
like
really
easy
and
like
eliminate
steps,
and
some
people
have
mentioned
different
tools
that
you
can
use,
and
so
ideally,
I
would
like
to
have
like
one
section
where
it's
like.
These
are
the
tools
for
this,
for
that,
for
that,
like
so,
people
can
just
go
and
find
like
a
hub
for
different.
You
know
things
that
people
have
used,
bots
and
and-
and
so
I
mean
and
and
the
idea.
A
I
think
this
is
like
the
overarching
thing
and
I
plugged
in
at
some
point
it's
going
to
if,
when
it
talks
about
the
letter,
it
has
a
link
to
the
latter,
which
is
like
a
very
specific
thing
right,
also
at
some
points
like
if
you
want
to
have
like
recruitment
ideas
like
actual
like
how
to
do
that,
it
links
to
to
paris's
recruitment
book
and
things
like
that.
A
B
I
was
just
gonna
suggest
because
it's
eventually
gonna
be
on
a
website
where
you
have
the
freedom
to
break
it
up
into
maybe
like
us,
its
own
directory
with
multiple
like
web
pages
inside
of
it.
You
know
like
feel
free
when
you
submit
the
pr
to
to
if
you
want
to
proactively,
just
make
like
maybe
a
page
for
the
tools
that
was
like
one
thing,
that
kind
of
popped
in
my
head.
I
mean
definitely
feel
free
to
do
that.
A
Oh
no
yeah
and
like
that's
the
easiest
one,
you
have
a
navigation
and
you
can
click
and
just
see
what
you
want
to
see
so
otherwise
yeah
it's
it's
it's.
I
think
that's
easier
right,
like
you
click
on
it
and
then
you
can
see
it.
I
mean
it
makes
it
more
user-friendly
than
just
you
know,
being
having
the
whole
thing
in
front
of
you
and
you're
like.
Oh,
my
god,
it's
overwhelming,
but
not.
B
In
a
bad
way,
but
just
you
know,
I
think
people
will
feel
a
little
more
like
I
can
handle
reading
through
this.
If.
A
Little
bit
like
the
dots
where
you
kind
of
like
click
on
things
and
it
opens
the
different
sections-
you're,
not
you,
don't
have
to
necessarily
see
everything
you
know
kind
of
so
I
don't
know
make
it
more.
You
know
bit
by
bit
stuff,
but
I
just
started
writing
and
putting
stuff
there.
So
I
don't
know
so
that's
why.
B
Yeah,
charles,
we
were
just
kind
of
going
through
what
anyone
had
that
was
kind
of
ongoing
work
that
they're
willing
to
say
that
they're
doing,
I
don't
know
if
you've
been
on
anything.
E
I
I
I'm
still
I'm
I'm
working
on
them
by
working
on
I'm
thinking
a
lot
about
the
contributor
or
the
onboarding
template
so
yeah.
I
know
what
the
basic
framework
looks
like,
and
I
myself
need
to
put
this
into
a
pr
just
like
the
first,
like
a
draft
pr
basically
get
that
first
round
going
through
and
then
like
start
working
on
it
piece
by
piece,
but
I
I
actually
got
away
from
the
computer
more
than
I
thought
I
would
over
the
last
couple
of
weeks
so
yeah.
E
So
but
that's
that's
the
part
that
I'm
working
on.
B
E
And
this
is
it's
been
an
interesting
day
in
terms
of
like
contributor
growth,
because
in
the
governance
working
group
we
talked
a
lot.
As
you
know,
about
the
contributor
ladder
there
was.
E
Some
in
paris
talked
about
just
the
different
categories
of
of
contributors,
and
so
it
turns
out
that
we're
updating
our
governance
stocks
today,
there's
a
pr
that
came
out
like
right
after
that
that
I
knew
there
was
some
work
going
on
there,
but
I
didn't
realize
that
it
was
happening
like
today,
so
that
is
interesting
and
then,
as
part
of
part
of
that
governance
stock,
there
was
a
note
in
there
about
like,
should
we
add
a
how
to
become
a
maintainer
section
which
ties
in
with
what
we're
talking
about
here.
B
That's
great,
can
you
give
me
your
github
username,
just.
B
D
B
D
So
I
assume
the
ones
I
don't
have
names
are
the
ones
that,
like
haven't,
been
started.
Yeah
so
like.
If,
if
we
look
at
the
issue,
there's.
B
D
So
is
the
reviewing
one
that
would
that
be
a
template,
yeah
yeah,
it
would
be
a
template.
B
Some
some
projects
smoosh
it
all
together
with
the
contributing
guide
or
they
call
it
something
else
like.
Sometimes
they
recall
they
call
it
like
for
the
maintainers,
like
everyone
has
a
different
name
for
it,
but
I
think
we
named
it
after
what
porter
did
it,
because
I
wrote
this
and
it's
just
it's
just
guidelines
for
when
you
do
a
review.
D
Do
you
think
that
it
should
do
you
think
it
should
be
separate,
or
do
you
think
it
should
be
combined
with
the
contributing
one?
Just
in
the
sense
that,
like
if
you're
contributing,
you
might
also
want
to
know
what
the
reading
process
is
going
to
look
like
on
the
other
side?
So
I
document
it
from.
B
Both
sides,
because
they're
different
audiences
sure
so
like
here's
here
this
was
the
idea
for
we'd
like
to
have
something
like
this
in
the
template.
Repo.
B
The
reason
why
I
didn't
put
it
in
the
contributing
guide
for
porter
is
because
people
who
come
to
the
contributing
guide
are
brand
new
contributors
and
us
extolling
what
a
reviewer
should
be
doing.
Maybe
they
need
to
be
checking
extra
things
or
running
manual
steps
or
how
to
not
be
a
jerk.
You
know
it
kind
of
like
makes
that
new
contributor
guide
so
big
that
it's
overwhelming
to
have
like
it
become
this
catch-all
bucket
for
content
and,
at
the
same
time,
we
kind
of
document
it
two
different
ways.
B
We
say
if
you're
a
new
person
right.
This
is
the
process
as
far
as
you're
concerned,
and
this
is
what
you
can
do
to
move
things
along
if
you
need
to
ping
someone.
This
is
what
you
can
expect.
These
are
your
rights,
basically
as
a
from
the
contributor
side
and
then
from
the
reviewer
side.
We
put
what
are
your
responsibilities
or,
like
you
know,
honestly,
like
porter
like
we'll
kick
you
out?
If
you
don't,
if
you're,
not
a
nice
person,
you
know
character,
maintainer
or
not.
B
You
know
so
there's
things
like
that
in
there.
That
kind
of
lay
all
this
out
that
I
think,
if
a
new
contributor
saw
it
they'd,
be
like
how
much
of
this
does
it
apply
to
me
et
cetera,
okay,
but
I
mean
I'm
open
to
different
structures.
E
I'm
going
to
share
a
link
here
that
one
of
the
people
who
does
the
majority
of
our
reviews
says
that
he
loved
everything
that
was
in
this
code
review.
It's
called
how
to
make
your
code
reviewer
fall
in
love
with
you,
so
it's
kind
of
the
flipped
flip
side.
Well,
I
guess
not
it's
from
the
contributors
perspective,
but
it
also
gives
advice
to
reviewers
as
well,
so
he
spoke
really
highly
about
about
it.
I
read
through
it,
and
I
mean
it.
There's
really
some
important
points
that
resonate.
E
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that
for
the
reviewing
thing
as
well,
this
probably
should
have
a
companion
advisory
guide
where
we
link
to
stuff
like
this,
and
we
just
talk
about
what
we
recommend
in
general.
That
may
not
actually
be
in
the
template
and
maybe
just
be
things
that
people
think
about
when
they're
saying
how
do
we
want
to
run?
You
know,
reviews
for
our
project
and
then
we
can
link,
because
I
think
I've
seen
something
like
this,
not
the
same
content,
but
the
same
like
topic
of
just.
B
D
Yeah,
I
mean
I'm
kind
of
planning
on
just
like
approaching
this,
like
I
did
the
contributor
ladder
and
hoping.
B
A
Okay,
and
at
some
point
I
would
love
you
to
have
a
look,
so
I
don't
know,
probably
if
once
we
have
the
other
info
in
there,
but
it's
like
if
you
want
to
have
a
look
at
the
growth
framework
at
some
point,
that
would
be
like
yeah.
The
more
people
look
at
it
and
for
me,
like
I'm,
totally
new
to
the
open
source
part
something
like
yeah,
so
any
feedback
would
be
highly
appreciated.
A
B
D
D
D
B
A
I
don't
know,
should
we
wait
until
because
it
is
super
long
but
yeah,
as
I
mentioned,
scott
had
already
kind
of
gotten
people
from
link
container
d
and
and
prometheus
to
agree
for
for
an
interview.
So
I'm
wondering
if
we
should
get
that
info
first
and
then
see
and
probably
then
cut
things
that
are
not,
as
I
don't
know,
if
it
may
yeah.
Probably
we
should
get
that
info
in
there
first,
because
people
are
not
gonna.
Look
at
it
twice.
They're
just
gonna.
Look
at
it
once
right.
B
No,
I
was
just
saying
like
we
can
look
at
it
and
review
the
document.
That's
there
and
if
you
wanted
more
feedback
than
just
us,
you
know
you
can
you
can
link
it
there
and
get
you
know
josh
and
everyone
else
looking
at
it.
Yeah.
E
I
do
like
the
idea
of
putting
it
in
getting
the
pr
in
sooner
and
having
people
make
comments
in
github
just
for
the
posterity,
and
you
know
you
can
tag
people
in
github
as
well
just
as
easily
as
you
can
in
a
google
doc,
but
either
way
as
long
as
we're
getting
eyes
on
it.
That's
the
important
thing:
yeah.
A
Yeah,
I
don't
want
to
burn
the
you
know
like
and
then
after
when
we
have
like
the
like
other
information
that
people
say
like.
Oh,
I
looked
at
it
already,
so
I
don't
know
I,
but
I
don't
know
what
the
best
process
is
right
like
I
want
like
the
more
people
can
look
at
it
and
the
more
people
can
tweak
and
comment
and-
and
you
know
the
better
right,
but
I'm
happy
to
do
whatever
you
guys
say
is
like
if
earlier
is
better
my
experience.
B
Is
that
people
are
more
likely
to
leave
a
rando
little
comment
on
the
the
google
doc
you
know
and
they're
less
likely
to
do
large,
edits
in
in
your
existing
poll
request.
Does
that
make
sense.
A
B
You
know
it's
up
to
you
you're
really
really
far
along.
You
have
a
ton
there.
If
you
like
what
you
have
there,
I
mean
I
would
encourage
you
just
to
get
it
out
there
and
have
people
look
at
it.
People
are
way
more
likely
to
look
at
follow-up
prs
that
are
much
smaller
and
targeted
like
and
here's
the
feedback
we
got
from
these
two
interviews,
so
we
decided
to
update
the
doc
in
this
way,
because
then
it's
a
five
minute
review
instead
of
oh.
D
A
B
Why
I'm
saying
in
a
in
a
pull
request,
we
can
put
it
out
there.
We
can
do
a
light
review
for
major
edits
like
spelling
stuff,
like
whatever
like
major
problems
and
then
just
get
emerged,
and
then,
when
scott
does
his
interview,
he
could
do
a
second
pr
and
more
stuff,
and
then
you
don't
have
to
call
out
what's
new
it'll
be
obvious
from
the
pr
okay
but
whatever
you're
comfortable
with,
and
you
know,
I
was
just
saying
that
you'll
get
more
people
trying
to
change
your
text
in
a
google
doc
because
it
feels
less.
B
You
know
what
farther
along
it's
just
kind
of
easier
to
massively
change
your
text
than
a
google
doc.
I
guess
in
a
pr
it's
a
little
harder
because
you're
like
composing
in
a
text
box.
A
Okay,
let
me
I
think
I
may
yeah,
let's
just
brainstorm
with
charles
because,
like
charles
hasn't
read
the
latest
version,
so,
okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
not
total
like.
Oh,
this
is
far
too
long
and
it's
like
not
really
useful
before
I
put
it
out
there,
so
I
have
like
some
kind
of
feedback
before
it's.
No,
whatever
you're
comfortable
with,
I
was
just
giving
you
an
opportunity.
E
E
I
say
this
is
somebody
who
values
like
if
I
have
a
an
end
date
for
something
I'm
much
more
likely
to
like
work
on
it,
but
at
the
same
time
since
we're
this
is
like,
in
addition
to
the
work
that
we're
already
doing,
I
hate
to
put
a
like
a
date
on
something
for
other
folks,
so
I
think
the
solution.
There
is
probably
me
just
putting
my
own
timelines
on
myself,
but.
B
Occasionally,
we
do
have
dates,
for
example,
if
we
need
to
get
advice
and
recommendations
to
the
tfc
on,
for
example,
graduation
requirements,
that's
really
more
the
governance,
a
working
group,
though
I
think
they
have
a
more
of
a
fire
lit
under
them
to
do
that
yeah.
B
E
Yeah,
I
think
what
I'll
do
is
I'll,
just
dump
what's
in
my
head
and
do
a
pr
and
then
then
draw
out
a
working
or
working
group
with
folks
after
that
or
working
session
yeah.
B
E
Yeah
that
made
sense,
as
I
was
talking
through
it
so
yeah.
Those
were
the
only
things
that
I
had
so
I
continue
to
find
this
group
useful.
So
it's
great
good
good.
A
I
like
it
that,
like
without
pressure
we're
getting
stuff
done,
which
is
pretty
cool,
yeah
and
valuable
stuff.
I
feel,
like
all
all
the
things
that
are,
that
I've
seen
so
far
the
things
that
are
in
the
pipeline
and
it's
all
super
valuable.
So
so
that's
kind
of
exciting
to
get
that
all
in
that
website,
which
we
all
cannot
wait
to
see,
live
so
keep
us
up
to
date.
When
you
find
out
yeah.
A
Like
right
after
this
meeting,
you
shouldn't,
if
she
doesn't
know
she
should
know
who,
because
like
yeah,
that's
the
cncf,
someone
at
the
cncf
must
be
able,
to,
you
know,
say
yeah
yeah.
So.
B
Well,
it's
just
that
I
have
forks
right
now
of
these
content
repositories
and
I'd
love
to
just
have
it
be
in
the
real
repository.
So
I
don't
have
to
maintain
like
merging
and
stuff
like
that,
because
those
people
write
new
things.
I
have
to
keep
on
top
of
that
to
make
the
preview
look
right.