►
From YouTube: GitOps Principles Committee Weekly Meeting 20210630
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
welcome
to
the
events
committee
weekly,
the
date
is
june.
30Th,
I
will
be
your
moderator.
Christian
will
be
taking
notes,
feel
free
to
add
yourself
to
the
attendees
list.
It's
always
nice
to
be
able
to
look
back
and
show
that
you
were
there.
A
Your
kids
will
want
to
know
so
today
on
the
agenda
right
now
we
have
two
topics,
any
other
topics:
we'd
love
for
people
to
add
other
than
that
we're
going
to
open
with
get
ops
con,
and
I
think,
maybe
christian
you
have
something
that
you
might
want
to
share
with
with
the
group
red
hat.
A
B
A
C
A
A
All
right
so
for
get
ops
con.
There
are
more
sponsorships
available,
so
we
do
have
a
diamond
sponsorship.
That's
still
available
up
for
grabs.
If
somebody
else
wants
it,
that's
a
30k
sponsorship
and
they'll
put
your
name
next
to
get
ops
con,
sponsored
by
red
hat
and
potentially
somebody
else.
If
everybody
wants
it
platinum
sponsorship,
which
will
give
you.
A
C
A
Get
recognition
during
the
opening
session
and
then
you've
got
gold
sponsorships,
and
then
there
are
these
diversity.
Sponsorship
is
open.
I
think
that
we
put
in
for
the
session
recording,
but
lunch
sponsors
should
still
be
open
as
well.
Scott.
D
Hey,
do
we
have
this
available
somewhere
that
that's
shareable.
D
And
I
know
that
some
of
the
the
questions
about
exactly
how
this
is
going
to
work
is
is
on
our
discussion
topics
for
today,
but
I
just
wanted
to.
I
was
just
curious.
A
Or
rather
I'll,
why
don't
I
put
it
in
the
events
committee
slack.
B
A
But
feel
free
to
feel
free
to
like
advertise
this
I
mean,
I
think
that
we
would
be
thrilled
to
see
a
bunch
more
people
jump
in
and
sponsor
this,
because
ultimately,
we
feel
like
there's
there's
an
opportunity
to
do
get
ops,
con,
bigger
and
better
next
year
you
know,
and
so
the
more
people
we
get
as
we
head
into
it,
the
better
it'll
be
so
you
know
the
easier
chance
we'll
have
with
that.
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
post
the
pdf
in
the
get
ups
events
channel
on
slack.
A
A
D
It's
funny
we're
almost
there,
but
we
we
just
put
a
prefix
like
wg
dash,
get
ops
in
brackets
in
front
of
the
posts
to
the
the
the
apps
tag.
D
Sorry,
not
the
apps
tag,
my
oh,
my
goodness.
Oh
my
gosh,
the
the
I'm
trying
not
to
say
sig,
apps
delivery,
but
the
apps
delivery
tag
mailing
list
a
little
bit
of
a
mouthful.
But
we
have
that
description.
We
have
the
description
of
that
on
the
how
to
get
involved
page
on
the
get
ups
working
group
too,
for
anyone
else
listening
in
and
wondering
why
I
how
I
messed
that
one
up.
A
The
other,
the
other
thing
to
update
on
here
probably
is
about
the
cfp
for
the
event,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
you
what
that
looks
like
right
now,
so
so
the
cncf
is
gonna.
Send
us
out.
A
And
the
cfp
right
now,
the
there's
this
section-
that's
kind
of
content,
the
overall
theme
we'll
I'll.
I
was
gonna,
write
a
brief
description
here
and
then
I
filled
in
a
bunch
of
suggested
topics.
So
this
is
a
if,
if
we
feel
like
there's
some
other
topics,
we
want
to
accept.
F
And
the
doc
that
dan
is
showing
right
here,
I've
linked
it
in
the
note
stock
under
cncf
get
ops
planning
dock.
So
if
you
have
input,
you
can
put
it
in
directly
to
the
dock,
which
is
where.
E
A
Okay,
well
I'll
I'll,
fill
this
in
at
some
point
later,
but
if
you
have
any
comments
or
thoughts
feel
free
to
throw
them
in
here
or
ping
me
directly,
because
it
does
need
to
be
done
today
and
then
they're,
putting
together
the
site
and
the
they'll
send
out
the
cfp.
I
think,
as
soon
as
the
cfp
is
ready,
we
should
send
out
a
big
message.
Like
hey
get
ops
con
is
happening,
cfp
is
open,
sponsorships
are
available
and
then
kind
of
just
always
promote
those
two
things
together.
A
Users,
so
I'm
going
to
be
thumping
this
pretty
hard
in
the
argo
community
love
to
see
some
flux
representation
in
this
get
ops
con,
since
we
didn't
have
it
in
the
last
one.
So
if
you,
if
scott
you
want
to
go
shout
that
into
flux
community,
I
think
that
would
be
good
too.
A
A
Yeah,
like
hey,
get
ops
con
is
looking
for
speakers
to
talk
about
how
they're
implementing
git
ops,
how
they're
doing
this,
what
tools
they're
using
all
these
kinds
of
things,
so
we'd
love
to
have
flux
community
in
here
we're
gonna,
have
an
argo
community
in
there
come
and
shout.
D
Yeah,
it
was
kind
of
funny
because
I
had,
I
purposely-
did
not
submit
a
cfp
myself
because
hey
we
said
we
were
going
to
specifically
de-prioritize
people
who
are
already
speaking
at
kubecon,
which
I
was,
and
secondly
I
just
I
think
strangely
assumed
that
there
would
be
a
flood
of
proposals
that
related
to
flux
as
well,
so
yeah
I'll
be
promoting
it
across
the
board,
but
also
for
all
the
get
ops
related
projects.
Yeah.
E
Do
you,
I
guess
I
was
trying
to
think
about
getting
the
folks
from
the
cd
foundation,
maybe
involved,
but
I
don't
know
how
other
than
the
fact
that
just
to
email
right.
E
Yeah
yeah
exactly
that's
what
that
actually,
without
what
I
was
thinking
the
folks
over
there
at
the
city
foundation,
we
should
probably
I
could
probably
send
an
email
on
that
and
saying
hey.
I
guess
once
we
get
everything
right,
say:
hey
the
cfp
is
open.
We
would
love
for
you
guys
to
come,
participate,
sort
of
thing.
D
That's
a
great
idea
and
cornelia
reached
out
to
them
before
about
to
try
to
integrate.
You
know
what
I
mean
some
of
their
speakers
and
people
with
with
with
get
optical.
I
know
it
was
a
little
too
rushed
on
their
end,
or
you
know
that
part
of
it
for
for
for
other
people
to
really
get
involved,
but
that's
very
cool.
You
know
it's
nice
that
even
in
last
minute
it
was
like.
Oh,
we
have
enough
talks
to
do
a
a
get
off
summit.
That's
awesome!
D
So
that
was
very
awesome
but
like
but
yeah
like
now
that
we
have
more
notice,
it
would
be
so
great
to
integrate
those
two
communities
more,
maybe
maybe,
like
you
said,
leveraging
or
not
leveraging
them,
but
ask
request
it
kindly
requesting
if
they
would
leverage
their
their
community
messaging
too.
D
Maybe
we
can
maybe
the
communities
themselves
can
connect
like
the
end
user
communities
can
connect,
and
not
only
the
speakers.
You
know.
F
F
A
F
A
D
A
I
like
you're
there
good
yeah,
like
I
said
cfp
should
be
available
like
tuesday,
is
what
we
were
hearing
back
from
the
cncf,
so
should
be
good
to
go.
E
B
D
If
there
are
any
of
us
on
the
events
committee
who
want
to
who
we
need
other
additional
people
to
have
access
to
twitter,
like
let's
just
make
an
issue-
or
let
me
know
we'll
make
an
issue
make
it
happen,
is
it
it's
an
issue
for
transparency
is
what
I
mean
yeah,
it's
the
the
the
actual
logistic
login
is
in
key
base.
Yes
yeah,
but
basically
we
what
we
have
right
now
is
we
have
a
communications
team.
It's
not
really
a
committee.
D
It's
just
a
group
of
people
who
are
responsible
for
the
different
public
faces
the
public
visibility
channels
for
the
group
and
for
open
getups.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
we
stick
with
the
transparency
goal
and
just
make
an
issue
for
it,
so
that
there's
some
tracking
yeah.
A
Yeah
right
now
you-
and
I
are
the
only
ones
in
cubase
on
the
twitter,
but
I
think,
like
chris
short,
has
access
to
it
too.
Doesn't
he.
A
Yeah
he's
not
on
the
the
the.
A
The
what
key
based
team.
D
Yeah
the
communications
team
in
key
base.
That's
right!
Yeah!
It's
like
it's
wg,
it's
good
ops,
underscore
wg.coms
is
the
sub
team.
We
have
to
make
short
names.
D
Yeah,
exactly
chris
short,
was
added
to
that,
and
so
was
sonia
in
in
a
github
issue,
just
not
to
the
key
based
team,
so
I'll
reach
out
to
them.
Thanks
for
that
reminder,.
A
Okay,
the
other
thing
for
get
ops
con
is
just
resourcing,
so
I
wanted
to
check
sarah.
We
were
a
little
bit
worried
about
your
time,
because
I
know
that
you
suddenly
found
yourself
very
overly
committed
in
q4
with
the
cncf
running
it.
Do
we
need
to
ask
for
more
help,
or
are
you
feeling
comfortable
with
it
now?
What
do
you
think?
I.
F
Feel
10
times
more
comfortable
with
cncf,
leading,
I
think,
from
a
collaboration
perspective
if
everybody
can,
if
there
are
areas
where
cncf
tags
is
in
a
dock,
and
you
all
have
an
opinion
case
in
point
like
influencers
in
the
community
in
that
one
docket
says
who
are
people
that
we
think
you
know
should
be
a
part
of
that
I'm
new
to
this
community.
So
if
you
all
have
an
opinion,
I
think
we
should
collaborate
that
way,
but
I
believe
that
they're
going
to
take
the
majority
of
the
heavy
lift
when
it
comes
to
logistics.
F
So
to
that
end,
I'm
feeling
much
better.
Now
that
they've
come
on
board
to
lead
this,
for
us.
B
F
Okay,
yeah
I
mean,
if
you
have
any
other
ideas
that
we
might
be
missing.
I
think
we
should
add
them
to
that
doc.
That
is
linked
here
and
I've
shared
with
everybody.
I
think
at
this
point
and
then
once
I
I
believe,
there'll
be
a
like
a
kickoff
call
or
like
a
a
bi-weekly
with
them.
If
that's
the
case,
we
can
add
in
everybody,
come
if
you
have
an
opinion
you
want
to
participate,
but
I
think
between
all
of
us.
We
can
execute
this
with
their
help.
A
D
Hey
sarah.
C
A
D
Would
you
mind
replying
to
this
issue?
I
don't
need
to
talk
about
it
in
the
meeting,
but
okay,
I
filter
the
issues
on
communications
and.
D
Means
just
for
anyone
else,
yeah
no
problem,
it
just
came
up,
and
so
I
was
about
to
make
some
issues
and
then
I
realized
I
already
did.
A
Cool
so
yeah
right
now,
we've
got
christian
scott
and
myself
as
the
committee
chairs,
and
then
we've
got
sarah
sonia
and
aubry
as
event
leads.
Is
this
everybody?
If
is
everybody
comfortable
with
that?
As
is
right
now.
A
And
then,
on
the
cfp
committee,
we've
got
myself
scott,
leonardo,
cornelia
chris,
henrik
who's
from
the
argo
team,
and
then
we
can
add
some
additional
ones.
So
do
we
feel
like
there
are
some
other
names
we
need
to
add
here
right
now,.
D
E
Well,
originally
we
also
had
like,
but
he
I
think
he
had
to
step
away
from
the
group
because
he
got
busy
with
work,
but
I
don't,
I
think,
that's
it.
I'm
not
sure.
E
E
I
don't
think
we're
missing
anyone.
What
about
rubber?
C
D
That
that
okay,
so
I
think
that's
the
only
person
missing
from
the
list
from
the
list
from
the
what
we
had
for
for
get
ops
con
last
time
from
the
team
list.
Anyway,
from
the
in
the
github's
teams,
the
github
teams
list.
D
I,
I
wonder,
did
we
sarah
you're
you're
asking
you
mentioned
the
cdcon
folks?
Did
anyone
volunteer
to
want
to
be
involved
at
all
in
the
cfp
committee
like
you
know
on
that
level,
or
were
they
just.
F
So
the
note
we
got
from
lindsey
over
at
cncf
is
that
they
were
interested
in
helping
or
supporting
the
the
event
wherever
needed.
That
particular
comment
was
tagged
in
the
cfp
committee
section.
If
we're
looking
for
like
specific
areas
or
names,
I
can
ping
lindsay
back
in
the
dock
or
just
be
a
slack
and
just
ask
her
hey.
What
does
this
look
like
or
who
was
it
or
how
do
we
engage
right?
D
F
D
Maybe
yeah,
let
me
ping
yeah.
Let
me
ping
her
really
quick,
okay!
Well,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
not
to
leave.
You
know
we
would
have
loved
to
have
done
that
last
time
and
now,
if
we
have
lead
time,
we
might
as
well
like
really
try
yeah,
and
I
think
the
idea
was
that
you
know
they
could
be
involved
in
you
know,
in
fact,
these
don't
have
to
stay
a
separate
organizations
that
can
be
crossover.
B
A
A
A
So
I
think
that's
an
action
item
that
I'm
happy
to
take
to
reach
out
to
hashicorp
and
ambassador
labs,
and
then
anybody
else
that
that
you
see
out
there.
You
know
I'm
kind
of
of
the
mind
very
much
so
right
now
that
the
bigger
we
make
this,
the
better
it
is,
and
the
more
companies
involved
the
better
it
is.
I
think
the
pie
can
get
very,
very,
very
large
and
we'd
all
be
very
happy.
You
know
with
our
participation
any
any
objections
to
that
line
of
thinking.
G
Seems
good,
the
only
thing
is,
if
you
want
me
to
help
it,
you
know,
unless
you
know
someone
specifically
and
how
she
work,
then
you
know
being
an
ambassador.
I
have
the
community
team,
pretty
close.
Oh.
A
Sure
yeah,
if
yeah,
please
engage
them
and
send
them
my
way
all
right.
D
That's
awesome:
cool
yeah.
The
list
should
we,
you
know
dan.
I
know
that
you
have
often
at
times
represented
interests
related
to
that
part.
Go
cd.
Do
you
want?
Do
you
think
we
ought
to
also
invite
the
intuit
folks
to
someone
to
be
more
directly
involved.
A
Yeah
that
so
I
invited
henrik
who's
who's.
One
of
the.
A
There,
because
I
think
that
alexander
and
jesse,
like
probably
wouldn't
want
to
review
cfps,
I
think
they'd
just
send
henrique
in
and
be
happy
with
it,
but
but
yeah
I'll
loop
them
in
and
and
keep
them
keep
them
aware
of.
What's
going
on.
D
D
Yeah,
I'm
asking
with
a
question
mark
because
I
know
that
because
I
know
that
intuits
has
has
supported
that
project
or
you
know,
runs
the
project
but
yeah,
but
but
I
hadn't
seen
any
any
sponsorship
from
them
in
open
source
stuff.
Otherwise
I
was
just
curious
if
maybe
they
would
be
like
this
sounds
cool.
A
Okay,
cool
yeah
so
well
I'll.
Take
an
action
item
in
the
meantime
to
just
do
some
outreach
and
go
from
there.
I
think
for
get
ops
con.
A
E
You
had
mentioned
something
in
the
chat
about
the
crosstalk.
Do
we
talk?
Sorry
because
I
I
had
to
take
a
a
call
again
half
emergency.
You
said
in
the
in
the
slack
channel.
You
said
there
was
a
something
about.
I'm
rereading
it
here,
just
kind
of
loud,
oh
about
us
running
the
entire
event
versus
help
from
the
cncf.
A
Yeah,
well,
you
made
the
decision
on
that
already:
okay
cool,
because
you
gave
the
cnc
up
30
grand
yeah,
nice
cool.
The
decisions
been
made.
That
was
I
was
I
was
thinking
about.
A
Maybe
us
trying
to
run
get
ops
con
ourselves,
which
is
like
it's
like
a
5k
sponsorship,
but
they
list
it
and
they'll
take
registrations
for
you,
but
then
you
just
have
to
find
your
own
venue
and
run
your
own
whole
own
thing,
and
there
are
some
advantages
to
that,
because
we
could
answer
offer
a
lot
more
sponsorship
packages,
though
looking
at
the
sponsorship
packages
that
they've
given
us.
A
A
A
A
D
Yeah-
and
it
might
just
be
that
you
know
some
of
I
know-
a
lot
has
been
up
in
the
air
with
with
post
covet
and
whether
or
not
there's
gonna
be
a
hybrid
event
or
it's
all
gonna
be
remote
if
there's
another
spike
or
whatever.
So
I
I'm
imagining
they
probably
had
some.
I
mean
I'm
not
trying
to
justify
anyone
else's
communication
because
I
don't
know
the
answer,
but
I'm
just
giving
the
benefit
of
the
doubt.
Yes,
oh.
D
A
I'm
actually
just
a
straw
poll
here,
like
I
think
all
of
you
have
seen
that
the
cncf
is
requiring
everybody
to
provide
proof
of
vaccination
in
order
to
attend
the
event.
Do
you
guys
think
we
we're
of
a
split
mind
internally?
I
think
that
we're
gonna
have
a
really
big
physical
presence,
and
some
of
the
team
thinks
that
we're
not
gonna
have
a
big
physical
presence.
What's
the
straw
poll
here,
what
are
you?
What
are
you
thinking.
E
I
personally
think
it's
gonna
be
a
big
presence,
especially
since
it's
gonna
be
in
la
we're.
Gonna
get,
I
think,
a
lot
of
people
from
the
bay
area.
I
would,
I
would
imagine,
we're
gonna
get
a
large
people
from
the
bay
area,
because
it'll
just
be
in
state
it'll,
be
easier
and
then
people
from
the
west
coast
right.
So
like
seattle
portland
at
some
of
those
big
tech
hubs,
I
think
we're
gonna
get.
E
I
think
it's
gonna
be
bigger
than
I
think
than
it
would
that
we
anticipate.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
people
in
person.
The
only
people
I
think
that
will
be
remote
are
unfortunately
people
from
like
outside
the
country.
I
would
think,
and
then
people
who
are
wary
of
showing
vaccination
records-
I
guess,
would
be
another
one
so,
but
I
do
think
we'll
be
having
since,
since
it's
on
in
la,
I
think
we're
gonna
have
a
big
presence
from
the
bay
area.
A
D
Oh,
my
my
my
straw
poll
is,
I
agree.
It's
probably
well,
I'm
just
gonna
crystal
the
wallet
right
now
and
say.
I
think
I
think
it's
gonna
be
bigger,
because
people
are
just
as
long
as
it
can
remain
safe
and
as
long
as
people
feel
assured
that
it
can
be
as
safe
as
possible.
You
know,
like
the
vaccination.
Excuse
me
vaccination
cards.
While
it
may
un
accidentally
exclude
some
people
who
didn't
have
access
to
vaccination.
It
will,
for
the
most
part,
help
the
people.
People
feel
safe.
D
Who
are
on
the
fence,
and
you
know
we
just
want
to
hang
out
with
each
other
as
well.
So
you
know
you
can
get
all
the
rest
of
it
through
virtually,
but
you
cannot
get
the
facetime
the
face
to
face.
So
I'm
hoping
anyway.
E
Yeah
I
was
at
I
was
I
was
at
a
bar
last
week
and
it
was
really
weird
to
hang
out
with
my
friends
at
the
bar,
so
it
was
just
there's
people
that
are
still
starving
for
that
interaction.
It's
all
so
great.
A
Yeah,
okay,
I
agree
well
we'll
see
awesome
anything
else
with
get
off
con.
We
need
to
cover
today.
A
I'm
gonna
say
we're
gonna,
move
on
to
the
next
topic
and
then
feel
free
to
interrupt
me
as
that
triggers
the
last
remaining
thought
that
you
have
to.
We
have
to
get
out
the
next
topic
that
we
have
is
the
open,
get
ops
website.
A
A
So
I
was
kind
of
so
I
got
that
feedback
and
I
don't
know,
there's
there's
maybe
some
others,
but
at
the
same
time
and
somebody
somebody
mentioned
they
didn't
love
the
buttons
design
which,
like
I
kind
of
think
the
priority
right
now
is:
let's
get
a
website
up
and
then
we
can,
we
can
go
and
make
changes
and
stuff,
but
just
to
share
with
you
it's
actually
sitting
up
right
now,
just
in
a
netlify
for
oh,
it's
already
been
changed
to
blue
look
at
that
wasn't
even
watching.
Okay,.
D
E
Just
coming.
D
A
This
website
up
and
and
then
we
should
make
changes
so
like
right
now,
like
we
we're
missing
some
quotes,
I
was
going
to
go
and
fill
in
some
stuff
that
I
just
I
was
just
going
to
go
google
around
and
do
the
copy
editing
and
make
the
pull
request.
A
Get
offs
principles
you
know,
I
think
right
now,
it's
like
do.
We
have
any
show
stoppers
because,
like
we
don't
have
a
website
so
like
a
bad
website
is
probably
better
than
no
website,
but
I
might
be
alone
in
that.
So
this
is
the
next
point
of
discussion.
I.
D
Sorry,
I
I
thought
you
were
finished
with
that
sentence,
my
bad,
I
am
yeah.
I
feel
fairly
strongly
that
we
should
make
the
principles
reflect
all
the
work
that
we
put
into
this
as
a
group,
because
it's
kind
of
it's
one
of
the
major
things
that
we
have
to
show
for
what
we've
done
so
far.
D
And
you
know,
I
think
we
have
the
issue
to
simplify
that
first
sentence
already
or
the
pr.
Rather,
let's
go
ahead
and.
D
Yeah
yeah,
we
have
the
principles
meeting
directly
after
this,
but
I
would
say
you
know
one
good
way
to
show
the
need
for
it
is
to
just
write
it
as
the
version
0.1.0
is,
you
know
and
it'll
just
simply
say
the
principle
of
blah
blah
blah
and
just
see
it
on
the
whip,
sit
and
say
well
folks.
This
is
what
it
looks
like
right
now.
You
know.
E
I
so
first
of
all
I
I
I
completely
agree
sarah
put
in
the
chat.
I
love
this
website.
I
just
like
the
way
it
looks.
I
also
like
the
buttons
how
they
animate
when
you,
when
you
scroll
over
them,
that's
actually
pretty
pretty
clever.
This
is
why
I'm
not
a
designer,
I
would
never
would
have
thought
of
that
anyway.
I
I
just
want
to
echo
what
scott
was
saying.
E
I
think
the
only
quote,
unquote
issue
I
have
this
page
is
the
principles,
doesn't
necessarily
line
up
with
what
we
have
on
on
github
and
what
we
committed,
but
I
do
think
you're
right
dan.
That
needs
to
play
out.
However,
it
plays
out,
but
that's
like
I
guess
the
only
thing
one
and
then
a
follow-up
question
is-
and
this
may
not
be
pertinent
to
this
committee,
but
maybe
I'll
open
an
issue.
E
Do
we
have
so
we
we
decided
like
on
colors
and
like
logos
and
all
of
that,
but
I
think
we
still
need
to
eventually
create,
like
a
press
kit
to
where
we
actually
have
the
hex
number
right.
It's
like
hey.
If
you're
using
you
know,
openshift
get
out.
Sorry,
the
open
get
ops,
so
many
opens
in
my
in
my
world
open
getups,
you
know
here's
a
hex,
you
know
here.
Here's
the
certified
logos.
Things
like
that.
E
Maybe
would
have
avoided
some
of
this,
but
you
know
just
that's
just
me
picking
nets
at
this
point
in
general
I,
like
it
and
in
general
I
think
we
should
as
soon
as
okay.
So
let
me
preface
this
yeah,
I
agree
with
you
dan.
We
should
have
something
better
than
nothing,
but
I
I
do
want
to
reflect
on
the.
A
Okay,
so
I'll
I'll
update
the
the
copy
here
to
reflect
that,
and
I
think
in
terms
of
member
companies,
do
we
have
a
larger
list
of
companies
we
can
put
in
here
at
this
point?
Is
there
a
place
where
people
have
been
publicly
declared.
D
We
we
have
a
so
so
two
things.
In
fact,
I
linked
to
the
svg
for
the
style
guide
just
to
quickly
respond
to
christian.
The
readme
is
a
little
bit
nicer
there,
so
it
has.
It
has
the
the
color
so
right
before
I
respond
to
what
you
said
dan,
it
has
the
color
hashes
and
stuff,
but
I
do
personally
think
that
the
the
person
who
worked
on
this
design
really
nailed
it
with
finding
some
other
colors
that
look
really
great
together.
D
You've
never
used
it
before
yeah
we've
never
used
it
before,
so
it
was
kind
of
guest
work
by
the
original
logo
designer.
So
let's
my
vote
anyway
is
like.
Let's
do
it
because
it
looks
boss,
you
know,
and
then
yeah,
okay,
so
secondly,
dan
about
the
about
the
list
of
of
companies.
D
D
We
have
wait,
I
believe
it's
inside
the
charter,
my
mistake,
maybe
it's
inside
the
readme
or
the
governance,
perhaps
or
just
give
me
a
moment
here:
parties
somewhere
we
have
somewhere.
We
have
a
list
of
the
people
who
oh
never
mind.
No,
I'm
sorry.
On
the
read
me:
we
have
the
timeline
of
the
of
the
initial
companies
who
founded
the
ops
working
group
or
who
started
it,
but
then,
but
then,
yes,
we
have
the
interested
parties
document
that
we
added
in
the
in
the
charter.
D
Pr
that
lists
the
people
who
at
least
have
said
hey,
they
were
interested.
It
doesn't
mean
necessarily
that
hey
we're
super
involved
in
the
get
ups
working
group
or
that
there
they've
there
has
been
sustained
involvement
yet
or
or
that
we've
even
defined
what
it
means
to
be
a
member
as
an
organization.
Besides
this
that's
pretty
much
what
we
have.
A
A
D
The
most
important
yeah,
the
most
important
thing,
I
think,
is
that
you
know
we
get
approval
from
each
company
to
list
their
load
to
to
show
their
their
logos,
and
you
know
to
have
some
sort
of
an
issue
there,
whether
it's
in
a
pull
request
with
all
of
them
or
whether
they're
separate.
That
just
says
you
know
this
is
what
my
involvement
means
and,
yes,
I'm
you
know
I
want
to
be
listed
as
a
as
a
member
company
or
supporting
company.
E
Yeah,
it's
like
ask
us
for
forgiveness,
not
for
permission.
I
mean.
D
I
don't
I
don't
mean
to
be
like
the
the
annoying
stick
in
the
mud.
You
know
what
I
mean
like
on
this
one.
I
just
feel
that
there's
some
kind
of
protocol
that
we
have
to
follow
and
we
probably
at
least
for
things
like
this-
I
mean
I
just
know
when
I
worked
in
enterprise.
This
was
it
was
like
a
big
deal
for
some
companies.
You
know
like
people
get
they
could
like,
they
could
like
mess
up
their
jobs.
D
You
know
because
they're,
like
hey,
you
told
you
said
you
signed
up
for
the
interest
of
parties,
things
that
was
fine,
but
now
they've
got
our
logo,
you
know
etc.
So
I
just
think
it's
important
to
do
that,
but
maybe
in
the
meantime
we
could
say
because
we
don't
want
to
just
like
make
the
section
anemic
unnecessarily
right.
Maybe
in
the
meantime
we
could
say
we
we
could.
We
could
reach
out
to
people
to
just
ask
right
and,
and
then
we
could
add
a
link
to
say
see.
E
Yeah,
what's
so,
okay,
I
have
a.
I
have
a
question:
what's
the
if
you
go
back
to
the
to
the
site
dan,
the
the
community
tab
that
you
have
there,
so
so
one,
what
what
do
we
want
to
show
here
in
terms
of
members
right
versus
so
like
why?
What
what
are?
What's
the
differentiating
be
the
differentiating
factor
and
I'm
being
almost
purposely
obtuse
of
member
companies
versus
interested
parties
right
like
what
what's?
What's
that
and
and
is?
Is
it
important
to
show
interested
members
versus
member
companies.
A
Well,
I
think
the
goal
is
we
want
to
show
all
of
the
companies
that
have
some
involvement,
not
only
because
we
want
to
give
them
credit,
but
also
because
it
gives
more
legitimacy
to
open,
get
ops
as
a
standard.
It's
like
oh
look,
there's
75
companies
that
are
involved
in
this.
It's
you
know,
that's
that's
significant.
A
This
isn't
something
I
can
ignore
and
right
now
looking
at
it
like,
I
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
authority
on
the
page,
because
it's
like
well
amazon,
azure,
red
hat,
github
and,
of
course,
the
largest
of
the
orgs
code
fresh
and
weave
works.
You
know
everybody's
gonna,
look
at
this
and
be
like
okay,
yeah
there's
like
some
real
people
behind
this,
and
I
definitely
want
people
to
be
looking
here
and
thinking
like
wait.
How
do
we
get
our
logo
there
like?
We
want
to
be
involved.
E
F
I
was
just
I
was
wondering
about
that-
maybe
third
or
fourth
tan
tab
dan,
which
is
like,
is
there,
could
we
say
something
like
our
growing
ecosystem
and
then
drop
all
those
logos
there.
You
know
what
I
mean
and
just
do.
D
F
F
Think
about
that
from
the
partner
perspective
like
my
day,
job
is
not
events
well,
my
day,
job
is
events
but
as
partners
right-
and
I
just
think
about
like
how
do
you
gain
that,
like
dannon
and
team
always
talk
about
like
thought,
leadership
and
domain
authority,
and
I'm
like
you,
do
it
with
a
growing
partner
ecosystem
man,
so.
D
Yeah
or
just
partners,
or
whatever
you
think
right
around
that
that
that
all
yeah,
because
I
think
your
point
stands
that
make
a
a
less
specific
claim
because
folks
are
already
want
to
be
involved
and
have
already
signed
up
for
their
support.
The
details
are
forthcoming,
but
we
can
still
show
that
yeah.
A
Yeah,
okay,
lazy
consensus,
be
it
enacted
I'll
I'll
I'll
make
the
edit
and,
as
put
it
as
part
of
the
pr
that
we
open.
F
F
E
E
E
E
D
Okay,
I'd
like
to
I'm
going
to
reach
out
to
some
folks
at
weaveworks
for
some
quotes
on
on
get
ops,
because
I
know
that
there
have
been
a
growing
list
of
those
over
the
years
and
we
can
look
together
as
a
team
and
see
which
ones
feel
like
they
represent
our.
You
know
like
all
of
our
interests
and
they
sound
good
together.
Maybe.
D
Okay,
is
anyone
taking
notes
by
the
way.
E
D
E
Oh
for
we've,
works
quotes
right.
D
Or
just
I'm
going
to
ask
weave
works
for
general
quotes
on
git,
not
not
necessarily
from
weaveworks
but
from
other
people
as
well,
because
because,
since
that's
something,
you
know
that
it's
been
in
the
works
for
a
long
time,
I
know
that
the
marketing
team-
and
everyone
has
collected
things
like
that.
D
You
know
there
are
some
funny
ones
like
anyway.
Someone
said
that
git
ops
is
the
worst
name
for
the
best
process.
D
You
know
we
could
probably
find
something
good
yeah,
oh
dan,
there's
one
other
point
that
we
mentioned
in
the
last
in
the
last
meeting.
That's
about
the
website
is
that
there's
a
concern
that
I
raise
that
it
seems
like
others
I
could,
and
I
don't
want
to.
D
I
don't
want
to
make
this
website
any
harder
than
it
has
to
be,
but
but
the
concern
is
getting
out
of
sync
with
our
documents
that
we
already
have
in
potentially
getting
out
of
sync
with
the
documents
we
already
have
in
the
in
the
different
repos.
D
Is
there
a
do?
You
think
that
there
it
would
be
a
big
lift
to
to
work
together
on
some
quick
automation
to
to
slurp
in
those
documents
you
know
in
whatever
metadata
files
we
need.
We
can
add
somewhere,
that's
canonical,
so
it's
not
just
like
the
websites,
all
the
website,
content
and
then
everything
else
that
should
be
on
the
website.
Hopefully
they
stay
in
sync.
A
Yeah,
so
I
think
you're
right
that
we
should
do
that.
I
I
wouldn't
want
to
put
it
before
just
getting
the
website
up.
So
I
think
if
I
just
manually,
did
it
and
threw
it
up
and
then
we
could
work
on
some
automation
to
make
that
happen
automatically.
D
Okay,
yeah
that
that
sounds.
That
sounds
great.
The
other
thing
dan
is
if
just
like
in
terms
of
housekeeping,
since
this
is
in
your
repo
right
now
before
we
move
this
stuff
over
to
the
website's
repo.
Can
we
work
together
to
make
sure
that
all
the
the
cncf
boxes
are
ticked?
You
know
to
make
sure
that,
like
the
dco
is
all
there
and
the
license
is
all
up
to
date
and
all
that
crap.
A
Yeah
so
I
was,
I
was
going
to
open
a
pr
because
we
have.
We
have
a
repo
for
the
website
and
open
github.
So
I
was
going
to
open
a
pr
there
and
then.
A
D
D
That
I
might
go
ahead
because
it
was
my
action
item
from
last
week
to
make
an,
I
think,
an
events,
format.
E
D
Events,
repo,
so
that
we
could
have
you
know,
events
something
that
stand
on
their
own,
even
though
the
website
is
probably
the
biggest
vehicle
for
it.
There
will
probably
be
you
know,
other
other
things
that
use
that.
So
what
I
was
gonna
do
with
that,
and
also
probably
the
website
is
what
we've
done
with
these
other
repos
was
where
we
set
our
our
licenses,
and
you
know
just
the
basic
stuff
before
then
do
you
want
me
to
do
that
before
your
pr?
So
you
have
something
to
actually
pull
against
yeah.
D
Good,
okay
sounds
good.
We
can
collaborate
on
that
offline,
then
perfect,
fantastic.
Also,
I
don't
want
to
override
anyone.
I
just
want
to
say
this
looks
awesome
and
I
really
feel
appreciative
of
all
the
effort
you
put
into
the
stand
and
the
and
sarah
and
the
other
people
that
have
worked
on
the
design.
I
want
to
know
who
the
person
is
so
I
can
like
shout
out
their
name
directly.
A
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
post
the
one
my
copy
of
it,
because
his
is
private.
Oh.
A
And
I'll
be
making
the
pr
and
stuff
so
but
yeah
I'll,
throw
it
in
the.
D
D
Still,
looking
for
the
person
to
do
that
and
working
with
github
to
correct
anyway,
all
good.
G
A
All
right
well,
looking
at
the
agenda,
those
were
the
two
items
that
we
had
anything
else.
We
need
to
bring
up.
We've
got
nine
minutes
left
in
case
we
have
any
other
discussion.
We
want
to
do.
D
No,
except
for
just,
I
just
wanted
to
tell
you
timing
dan,
basically
after
the
get
ups
guide
to
the
galaxy
talk
which
which,
if
the
website
was
up,
we
should
put
that
on
the
events
list,
but
it's
not
yet
so
after
that
is,
is
after
I'm
done
with
hanging
out
with
christian
and
chris
there
I
can,
then
I
want
to
wait
till
after
that
to
get
the
repo
stuff
set
up.
If
that's
okay
timing,
for
you.
A
E
There
was
one
action
item
that
we
brought
up,
that
I
guess
no
one
took
I
I
don't
mind
taking
it
as
unless
someone
else
has
better
contact
about
talking
to
the
whoever
from
the
cd
foundation
to
ask
them
if
they
wanted
to
was
it
was
that
you,
sarah,
okay,.
F
A
D
A
All
right
so
just
assignments
for
next
week.
I
think
I
might
be
traveling
next
week
what
yes
I'll,
be
out
of
the
office
next
week.
So
I
won't
be
here
so
any
volunteers
to
moderate.