►
From YouTube: CNCF CNF WG Meeting - 2022-08-15
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
C
C
A
I
just
put
it
them,
so
obviously
there
is
going
to
be
an
opening
for
a
days,
mexico,
all
right.
A
few
of
the
sessions
are
going
to
be
related
with
telcos,
but
and
obviously
I
guess
indicator
doesn't
speak
spanish,
so
more
likely.
C
Accelerated
the
nvp
envy
sorry
nfv
data
plane
is
that
one
part
of
open
end
for
days.
A
Yeah
yeah,
so
probably
the
title
is
in
the
top
like
yeah.
A
Exactly
so,
most
of
the
sessions
are
going
to
be
in
spanish,
some,
but
there
are
a
few
of
them
which
are
going
to
be
in
english
and
they
are
related
with
them,
the
telco
so
and
yeah
those
are
free.
So
if
you
want
to
see
something
or
any
topic
that
you
get
interested,
that
you
can
join
and.
C
It's
good
to
know:
thanks
is
this
going
to
be
recorded.
A
Those
decisions
are
pre-recorded,
but
the
the
band
is
going
to
be
open.
A
Yeah
but
overall
yeah,
maybe
maybe
that
one
is
going
to
be
in
spanish,
I'm
not
sure
because
at
least
the
speaker
seems
to
be.
A
Or
maybe
maybe
I
can
contact
later
like
the
the
speakers
and
maybe
he
can.
He
can
do
something.
A
Oh,
I'm
just
going
to
explain
like
to
understand
the
workflow,
like
you
have
internally
kubernetes
when
cubelet
is
consuming
the
cni
and
a
few
things,
but
it
is
the
same
I
mean
my
presentation
is
in
spanish,
so.
C
A
Yeah
it's
a
similar
thing.
I
just
collect
some
of
the
telco
sessions,
for
example,
the
first
one
is
from
yeah
and
the
other
one
is
from
ronnie.
So
I.
C
C
Maybe
reaching
out
to
folks
saying
they're
interested
in
talking
with
the
working
group-
and
maybe
you
know
this
is
maybe
they
have
some
best
practices
related
to
the
networking
layer
yeah
how
to
break
a
network
all
right.
C
One
summit
in
seattle-
I
do
sorry
apologizes-
took
a
second
to
get
off
mute
there.
I
am
planning
on
being
there
all
right.
What
about
kubecon?
North
america?
Yes?
C
B
Yeah
so
victor
suggested
some
changes
which
I've
made.
I
wanted
to
ask
a
question
about
the
checks,
so
one
of
the
checks,
that's
failing,
is
on
a
broken
link
in
a
page
that
isn't
affected
by
this
pr.
So
are
we
okay
making
the
change
in
this
pr,
even
though
it's
about
the
glossary
which
isn't
in
scope
of
this
pr,
otherwise.
C
I
think
so,
maybe
something
to
do
when
we
see
these
so
don't
be
blocked.
If
it's
unrelated
to
your
changes,
someone
else
is
doing
something
but
open
a
issue
to
fix
the
one
that
you
see.
A
I
think
that
I
open
up,
you
are
fixing
the
broken
link.
I
remember
correctly,
but
yeah,
I'm
great
with
taylor
like
let's
prove
this
and
fix
the
broken
link
in
rpr.
B
Okay,
cool
and
the
other
question
was
there's
a
few
spell
check
errors,
and
I
wondered
whether
it
was
okay
just
to
chuck
stuff
in
the
spell
checklist.
B
It's
a
bit
weird,
some
of
the
things
it's
a
top
one.
For
example,
a
issue-
that's
that's
kind
of
the
middle
of
and
an
html
url.
So
the.
C
B
C
C
B
B
C
Yeah
and
if
we
can
just
get
it
in
as
a
first
run
version
and
then
we
can
update
so
as
long
as
there's
nothing
major
to
change.
Okay
sounds
good.
C
And
drew
lucina
watts
and
anybody
else,
just
if
you
can
give
it
a
review
and
comment
or
thumbs
up
if
it's
ready
to
go.
Oh,
I
see
someone
else
join
muhammad
hi,
mohammed.