►
From YouTube: CNCF CNF WG Meeting - 2023-02-27
Description
Don't miss out! Join us at our upcoming event: KubeCon + CloudNativeCon Europe in Amsterdam, The Netherlands from 18 - 21 April, 2023. Learn more at https://kubecon.io The conference features presentations from developers and end users of Kubernetes, Prometheus, Envoy, and all of the other CNCF-hosted projects.
A
A
A
Yeah,
okay,
I
think
that
we
kind
of
started
so
feel
free
to
add
I
items
to
include
agenda
in
case
that
you
want
to
discuss
something,
or
at
least
put
your
name
in
the
attendance
list
seems
like
is
something
that
was
brought
from
from
the
last
last.
The
last
meeting.
A
Just
checking
incoming
events,
probably
many
people
are
attending
the
and
you
will
see
in
Barcelona,
so
I
just
want
to
mention
that
the
regarding
the
elephant,
developer
and
testing
Forum
all
most
of
the
recordings
and
slides
are
there.
So
you
want
to
take
a
look,
feel
free
to
check
the
videos
and
everything.
A
A
Yeah
this
is
that
are
completely
okay,
but
most
importantly,
is
the
kubecon
and
the
cloud
thing
the
cloud
native
talk
away.
A
So
any
particular
announcement
Lucina
that
you
have
about
the
cloud
native
Circle
way.
C
B
Additional
sponsorship
opportunity
which
may
have
closed
but
I'll,
check
and
see
if
there
was
an
extension
in
addition
to
the
regular
sponsorships
there
was
a
new
live
stream
option
which,
if
anyone
is
unable
to
travel
to
Amsterdam
this
April,
there
was
a
live
stream
sponsorship.
Option
too
add
excuse
me
add
that
remote
attending
option
that
without
the
sponsorship
it'll
be
in
person
only.
A
A
Any
other
event
that
it
is
is
not
disappear,
and
you
consider
him
interesting
to
attend
or,
like
mention.
A
Okay,
if,
if
you
have
something
or
some
some
event
that
you
you
consider
be
free
to
your
ad
in
this
place,
yeah,
we
really
appreciate
anything
regarding
that.
A
Probably
tailored
the
U
app,
these
particular
items
or.
D
Other
than
that,
are
you
asking
about
the
birds
of
a
feather
session?
Yes,.
A
I
I
told
that
it
is
here,
I
didn't
I.
I
I
didn't
see
that
before
so
it
is,
it
is
something
that
is
a
proposal
or
like
it
is
it's
confirmed
or.
D
It
would
be
no,
it
would
be
informal,
so
nothing
official
on
the
schedule
and
I
I
think
that
there's
enough
interest
in
doing
it
in
person
meeting,
though,
that
we
could
put
something
together
and
then
maybe
Tweed
about
it
and
you
know,
put
it
wherever
LinkedIn
message.
Some
places
saying
that
we're
going
to
have
that
and.
D
Try
to
find
a
location
ahead
of
time,
and
if,
if
we
can,
you
know
have
a
designated
area
great
and
otherwise
you
know
we'll
just
find
something
when
we're
on
site,
but
I
I
figure.
We
can
have
something
like
what
we
do
on
a
weekly
basis
but
open
to
you
know.
Whatever
people
want
to
put
forward
if
we
want
to
use
it
as
a
working
session
to
dig
into
areas
that
we've
been
talking
about.
That's
fine,
too.
A
Okay,
yeah
definitely,
hopefully,
that
people
can
give
us
some
feedback
and
see
what
happened.
Okay,
let
me
open
the
Minister
review
in
the
PRS.
We
have.
Oh
often,
not
close.
So
that's
good
news.
A
So
I
have
created
this
one
yeah
I
did
not.
This
is
something
that
we
discovered
during
the
creation
of
the
draft
right
Taylor.
So
we
consider
like
be
nice
to
have
glossary
term
regarding
this
privilege,
but
I
can
I
come,
can
take
it
as
an
owner
for
this.
A
So
it's
just
a
matter
of
doing
the
proposal
like
it's
very
simple,
like
a
well
the
simple
like
the
content
of
the
the
Dr,
but
definitely
requires
a
lot
of.
A
D
Yeah,
we
do
have
a
good
chunk
of
content
already
as
well.
That
folks
have
worked
on
like
Ian
and
other
effects,
so
we
can
pull
from
that.
It
might
be
good
to.
D
As
related
to
this,
we
could
take
a
look
at
the
glossary
and
see
what
are
some
important
things
that
may
be
missing
when
we
think
about
conversations
that
are
happening
or
confusion.
When
we're
talking
about
the
difference
in
how
networking
is
discussed
for
kubernetes
usage
in
general
versus
Health
Telecom.
Networking
is
a
lot
of
and
those
type
of
terms,
or
it
might
be
built
a
list
of
here,
so
here's
three
or
three
to
five
things
that
we
could
contribute
and
then
start
drafting
those
and
get
input
from
folks.
A
Okay,
I
will
try
to
work
on
this,
but
if
you
want
to
help
me
on
that,
more
than
welcome
so
obviously
is
just
getting
that
PR
and
work
with
it
that
the
community
members
there
and
trying
to
finance
more
broadly
an
understandable
way.
A
A
This
is
something
that
slug
or
hunting
secret
ownership,
something
that
we
have
received
any
response
from
him.
D
D
Update
all
of
the
links
across
the
board
and
move
that
stuff
in.
A
Yeah,
this
is
same
regarding
glossary,
so
my
probably
my
major
concern
is
about
CNF,
because
you
saw
a
term
that
we
haven't
clearly
defined
in
the
sense
that
I
have
seen
people
like
sometimes
repairing
at
the
container
native
function.
So
they're
saying
you
know,
maybe
so,
and
even
as
Cloud
native
Network
function
we
have
to.
A
Surely
you
find
all
the
the
details
about
these?
Just
just
give
you
an
example.
Let
me
fix
Tom
some
arbitrary
terms
like
you
see,
for
example,
health
engineering,
that's
the
way
that
they
are
defined
things
so
first
of
all,
is
without
plain
English.
A
What
is
what
is
this
concept
trying
to
avoid
any
cross
references
or
like
the
next
part,
is
what
is
the
problem?
That
is
others
in
this
particular
term.
We
also
have
to
really
Define
the
the
problem
statement
in
particular,
and
the
last
section,
obviously
is:
how
did
this
helps
so
normally
defining
the
concept
is
also
like
trying
to
provide
a
value
that
this
particular
Technologies,
offering
in
particular,.
A
They
have
different
status,
I,
don't
remember
exactly
which
are
there
but
yeah.
You
can
do
a
proposal.
You
can
keep
as
a
feedback
appreciated
with
this
like
waiting
for
others
to
verify
certain
things
and
I,
don't
know
which
triggers
or
what
triggers
the
the
different
the
change
of
the
status,
but
eventually
when
the
status
is
seen
completely
started,
the
the
term
is
going
to
be
polished
or
available
in
the
website.
A
A
So
what
we
have
to
keep
in
mind
is
particularly
this,
these
three
particular
sections
in
the
term,
so
for
every
single
term,
we
have
to
think
about
it.
There
are
few
exceptions
like,
for
example.
Maybe
abstraction
is
one
of
them
which
doesn't
require
like
those
those
sections,
but
it
is
because
it's
more
like
a
property
and
behaves
like
a
different
like
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
split
it
in
those
three
things,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
this
is
her
case
like
they
think
that,
for
us
is
going
to
be.
A
Obviously,
if
we
need
like
to
refer
on
other
things
like,
for
example,
Cloud
native
apps,
we
can
do
cross
reference
between
the
the
glossary
terms.
D
Yeah,
it
seems
like
Cloud
native
Network
function
should
directly
refer
to
that
one
and
that's
the
definition
we
have
been
using
is
similar.
As
far
as
what
is
a
cloud
native
Network
function,
it
is
a
a
cloud
native
application.
That's
providing
networking
functionality
at
the
simplest
term
that
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
put
it
in
there,
I
mean,
especially
since
we're
saying
this
is
census
glossary
and
they
have
a
CNF
certification.
I,
think
that
wouldn't
be
a
good
one
to
put
in
their
main
glossary
and
get
it
published.
A
Yeah
the
only
thing
that
I
have
in
the
city.
We
have
these
particular
two
sessions:
six
sections,
sorry,
but
yeah,
it's
just
a
matter
of
thinking
about
it
right.
D
Yeah
and
because
it
would
be
good
to
be
able
to
communicate
it
in
those
three
parts.
What
is
it
a
problem
set
address
and
and
how
it
helps
I
think
that's
useful
for
conversations
with
anyone
that
will
you
know
we're
wanting
to
be
involved
in
the
community,
so
they
understand
as
well.
A
D
A
A
It's
not
yeah,
do
you
have
a
link,
the
or
the
draft
I
think
they
have
it
somewhere.
A
So
you
want
to
navigate
to
discuss
a
particular
section
or
just
in
general
mention.
D
A
D
A
I
think
well,
yeah
we
spend
a
couple
hours
on
these
and
I
guess
it's
been
a
good
shape
to
do
that.
I
haven't
seen
any
other
feedback
from
rollers,
so
probably
it's
time
to
move
it
to
the
next
phase
and
within
it's
a
PR,
I
I.
Think
on
that
it
it
has
a
lot
of
good
stuff,
discover
most
of
the
things
like
goals
and
the
definition.
The
summary
so
maybe
I
think
it's
good
time
to
move
forward.
C
A
A
It's
going
to
be
hard
to
deal
with
all
the
painting
can
I
do
offline,
because
yeah
I
would
like
to
cover
all
the
markdown
things.
B
A
And
also
run
all
the
CI
check
that
we
have
like
a
LinkedIn
and
spell
check
and
all
these
things.
D
D
Or
you
know,
some
editors
can
automatically
hit
a
button
or
whatever
and
it'll
start
formatting
for
whatever
language
they
support.
I'm,
not
sure.
If
I
have
one
that'll
automatically
do
that
in
the
markdown.
But
let
me
I
can
try
to
see
I
mean
we
could
do
it
offline
if,
if
we
want
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
this
out.
A
Yeah,
and
also
if
you
haven't,
checked
this
document
and
you
want
to
use
list
of
the
the
latest-
try
yeah,
try
and
just
review
it,
and
let
us
know
if
we
are
keeping
something
or
like
is
nothing
clear.
A
So
it's
going
to
be
easier
to
make
changes
here,
instead
of
the
pr
or
in
the
pr
as
well.
It's
like
once.
It
is
in
the
pr,
hopefully
receive
a
lot
of
reviews
on
on
that.
D
Can
you
add
the
link
to
this
Google
doc
into
the
GitHub
is
sure
oh
yeah.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
any
other
issue
or
the
pr
that
you
want
opr
doesn't
have
the
hours,
but
anything
that
you
want
to
discuss
or
get
deeper
conversation.
E
D
Yeah,
can
you
add
a
just
add
something
into
the
Google
Docs
as
an
agenda
item.
E
A
Yeah,
let
me
please
do
this
link.
This
laid
of
link
is
with
the
agenda.
B
A
The
way
Oliver
I
saw
that,
among
your
colleagues,
put
some
comment
from
the
list.
Previous,
oh,
no,
the
only
one
one
yeah
these
one
process
protect.
C
Oh
yeah,
okay,
good
because
I
know
I
had
asked
I
haven't
seen
them
myself,
but
I
had
asked
them
to
comment
on
there,
so
who's
that.
C
E
Yeah
and
I
post
CNF
landscape
tried
products
yep.
B
A
B
A
A
D
What
are
you're
running
as
far
as
what?
What
do
you
mean
by
CNF
landscape,
yeah,.
E
Did
I
I
watched
quite
a
few
of
your
videos
that
are
interesting
and
older
videos
on
YouTube
them?
For
example,
I
I've
had
a
question
about
I,
said
I.
The
freedom
of
service
match
I
was
having
a
question
about
that
and
then
the
silver
smash
group
recommended.
That's
like
join
this
group
about
that.
Ask
about
the
like
differences
and
current
status
between
the
the.
E
Multis-M
I
think
I
think
this
different
network
options
I
think
you're
supposed
to
discussed
in
your
previous
those
in
CNN
sessions,
so
yeah
just
trying
to
understand
like,
for
example,
there's
just
so
many
activities
going
on
so
those
maltes
DNS
analog
service.
Now
that's
a
different
network
options
that
was
tested
before,
but
I
believe
by
this
group
and
I.
Also
newer
initiatives
around
for
the
istio
is
creating
a
new
layer
for
option.
That's
a
nbm
mass
foreign.
E
Network
Foundation:
what's
the
active
I
said
it's
not
as
active
as
before,
but
it's
hard
to
actually
was
creating
a
lot
of
standing,
including
a
lot
of
projects,
including,
like
stratum.
You
know
all
those
different
kinds
of
their
options
and
and
also
Livingston
never
foundation
and
also
things
like.
A
And
you're
talking
about
in
the
in
the
developer
side
or
in
the
structure,
side
of
or
just
in
general,
like,
for
example,
one
of
the
initiatives
that,
in
the
infrastructure
side,
we
Define
also
those
Technologies.
As
is
anarchy.
Animal
kit
is
providing
reference
architecture
documents
and,
in
some
cases,
implementation
for
those
reference.
E
In
general,
obviously
yeah,
it's
also
just
like
you
know:
cncf
has
a
landscape.
I
wonder
is
easier,
like
Telecom
specific
landscape.
So,
what's
going
on
in
the
anything
related
to
what
this
group
covers.
Basically,.
D
So
just
a
high
level
what's
happening
with
Cloud
native
and
Telecom
at
a
across
in
the
world,
not
just
it
in
one
project
or
one
yes
organization,
but
just
everywhere
there
so
I,
don't
know
of
anything
like
that.
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
different
people
that
are
putting
stuff
together
and
I've.
Seen
slides
that
kind
of
reference,
different
ones.
D
D
Maybe
a
topic
for
the
either
the
birds
of
a
feather
or
something
to
show
here's
all
the
different
things
or
I
know
it
would
be
the
for
the
kubecon
CNF
working
group
birds
of
feather
or
it
could
be.
You
know
just
a
general
thing
to
put
out
Victor.
You
know:
we've
we
talked
about
maybe
having
some
other
white
papers
or
documents
in
the
working
group
outside
of
just
the
best
practices
like
the
highlighting
best
practices
from
other
projects
and
groups
and
looking
at
what
they
have
as
part
of
stuff.
D
That
would
be
relevant,
but
you
know
having
having
the
material
with
an
analysis
would
be
good
and
maybe
something
around.
This
would
be
something
that
we
could
look
at
anyways,
I,
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
out
there
that
I
know
of
that's
specifically
giving
like
a
a
landscape.
So
saying
here
is
what
the
onf
is
doing
and
over
an
alliance.
D
There's
when
you
say
o
ran,
you
usually
think
of
just
one
main
project,
but
there's
a
sub
pieces,
and
what
are
they
like?
You
know
what
are
they
doing
and
how
does
it
overlap
might
be
a
useful
thing.
We
would
want
to
have
what
is
the
purpose.
E
E
Just
understanding
the
like
the
trend
so,
for
example,
the
the
Telecom
industry
was
pretty
openstack,
focused
for
quite
a
while,
but
recent
years
the
trend
seems
to
be
too
kubernetes
container
and,
and
so
all
those
different,
regardless
of
which
Foundation
kubernetes
seems
to
be
the
trend.
So
so
what
is
the
common
theme
like
among
all
this
different
foundations
and
and
projects?
Is
there
any
common
theme
like
what
does
the?
What
is
the
network
technology
choices?
That's
available
that
it'll
be
great
to
understand
the
the
landscape,
yeah.
D
If
you
look
at
the
market
like
where
is
where
is
the
Telecom
Market
going
this
year
and
the
next,
you
know
two
to
three
years
and
out
that
if
you
look
at
the
analysis
that
are
happening
on
that,
then
you
see
clarification
is
one
of
the
words,
so
everybody
move
into
the
cloud
and
then
kubernetes
would
be
a
set
of
Technologies
and
a
I
would
say
methodologies
or
the
practices
on
using
the
Technologies.
D
When
people
say
cloudification,
it's
it's
and
you
look
into
what
the
other
words
that
are
used
around,
that
it's,
it's
more
about
designing
the
software
and
changing
how
you
manage
the
software
do
deployments
and
that
sort
of
thing
to
be
created
from
the
start
to
take
advantage
of
running
on
cloud-like
infrastructure,
and
the
other
thing
that
you'll
see
is
the
interoperability,
so
it
in
the
past.
You
would
say
we
want
these
applications
or
software
to
run
on
any
different
cloud
provider
or
private
and
public
Cloud.
D
D
So,
instead
of
in
it,
you
can
see
this
in
different
domains,
but
it's
been
staying
pretty
strong
for
a
long
time
in
the
Telecom
vertical,
where
applications
would
sometimes
expect
to
be
in
their
own
private,
essentially
like
a
a
mini
Cloud,
we
have
access
to
it.
We
may
be
using
these
common
apis
and
other
things,
but
we
expect
to
have
full
access
to
the
machine
underneath
so
not
really
treated
commodity
and
being
able
to
work
with
others
and
I.
Think
you
have
more
of
the
push
now
to
know.
D
We
want
them
to
to
to
work
better
together
and
not
expect
to
own
or
be
isolated
or
be
one
specific
set
of
software
that
be
more
compatible
with
multiple
options.
So
the
flexibility
is
is
being
requested
along
with
interoperability,
and
a
lot
of
that
ends
up
leaning,
I,
think
why
you're
seeing
kubernetes
that
the
software
and
the
I
would
say
like
the
way
that
the
practices
on
using
the
technology
they're
designed
from
the
ground
up
to
work
together
as
components
that
you
can
exchange
with
other
options,
so
they're
designed
that
way
from
the
ground
up.
D
And
if
you
look
at
like
all
the
different
cncf
projects,
including
say
BNS,
which
a
core
part
of
kubernetes
you
can
plug
in
it's.
It
was
designed
where
you
could
plug
in
different
DNS
providers.
You
know
the
whole
storage
infrastructure
and
when
you
look
at
stuff
like
the
networking,
so
multis
being
one
of
those
with
cni,
we
also
have
different
things
that
are
being
thought
of
more
recently
with
Sig
multi-network,
where
they're
trying
to
make
it.
D
The
multiple
interfaces
and
connections
be
native
objects
and
then,
as
long
as
you're
designing
your
technology
to
work
with
those
objects,
then
you
have
different
options
and
I
would
say
you
know
the
kubernetes
and
the
cncf
projects
that
are
focusing
on
being
native
to
the
cloud
they're
being
designed
with
that
stuff
in
mind,
and
that's
the
driver
behind
a
lot
of
what
you're
saying,
even
in
other
areas
like
nephio,
there's
a
Linux
Foundation
project
for
automating
deployments
and
the
management
of
that
initial
onboarding
and
and
making
those
sort
of
things
native
as
well.
I.
A
Yeah
yeah
I
mean
in
general
I
like
the
idea
like
having
a
CNF
landscape,
but
there
are
two
teams
that
came
to
my
mind
when
I
was
thinking
about
the
particular
topic.
The
first
one
is
Define
the
correct
the
criteria
like
we
have
to
be
sure
what
is
going
to
be
the
criteria
to
consider
technology
part
of
that
landscape,
so
I
mean,
for
example,
a
CNF
can
use
a.
A
Yeah.
The
same
applies
for
all
the
working
groups
and
even
for
the
closely
I
remember
having
similar
discussion.
So
we
can.
We
can
specify
as
a
working
group
we
can
say.
Well,
we
have
we
require
multi-network
or
or
to
achieve
certain
performance
performance
requirements.
We
need
like
a.
A
We
have
that
multi-networking
capability
in
place,
but
I
am
not
sure
if
we
have
to
specify
the
Technologies,
because
maybe
we
can
we
can.
A
We
can
end
it
in
in
certain
I
mean,
given
that
we
have
a
interesting
ecosystem
is
going
to
be
very
hard
to
not
promote
certain
Technologies,
for
example,
in
in
multi
multinational
area,
we
have
monitors,
we
have
genus,
we
have
nfm
as
Technologies
and
and
done
as
well.
So
so
just
it's
great
to
list
all
the
Technologies
but
try
to
avoid
to
recommend
something
in
particular.
E
Yeah,
so
so
the
the
one
is
bigger
texture
to
understand
like
what's
going
on
overall
in
Industry,
as
well
as
I,
guess,
a
list
of
all
the
projects
without
recommending
any
that's
one
area,
and
the
second
area
is
to
understand
what
each
product
does
will
be
grade.
Two,
for
example,
istio
is
going
deeper
right.
It's
going
to
layer
four,
whereas
psyllium
is,
is
creating
their
own
service
mesh.
E
So
so,
when
it
comes
to
having
Solutions
how
to
define
like
if
I
like,
if
I
want
to
create
a
a
private
5G
network
like
what
is
what
is
required,
is
there
any
like
generic,
like
components
needed
just
based
on
the
OSI
Network
layer,
not
specific
product
yeah
things
like
that
and,
of
course,
in
an
individual
discussion
like
going
into
the
actual
product?
But
definitely
you
know
that's
the
tricky
part
I
guess
how
to
not
talk
about
solution
without
talking
about
a
project
that
is
the
truthy
there.
A
D
Think
it's
a
pretty
big
I
think
it'd
be
a
pretty
big
ass
to
have
detailed
descriptions
and
even
like
a
good
high
level
other
than
what
you
could
pull
for
all
of
the
options,
because
there's
so
many
unless
you're
gonna
get
other
people
involved.
Ideally
you
know
we
get
people
that
are
part
of
that
onf
and
on
different
projects
and
other
things
to
come
in
and
and
contribute
to
that
when
we're
talking
about
a
a
landscape.
D
That
also
is
communicating
with
each
of
those
where
it's
the
value
and
then
of
course
you
have
well,
then
what
are
the
overlaps?
So
now
someone
has
to
do
and
then
I'll
analysis
on
that
and
then,
as
you
know,
Victor's
saying
at
some
point
it
has
to
be
up
to
whoever's.
You
know
making
that
final
decision.
Even
if
it's
someone
helping
the
you
know
the
purchaser
whoever's
going
to
use
it
they're
going
to
have
to
make
that
decision.
D
I
would
I'd
be
happy
to
see
something
like
that
even
work
on
it.
But
ideally
we
have
a
group
of
people
that
are
contributing.
We
did
have
something
that
maybe
would
be
complementary
to
this.
It
was
more
specific
to
sancia
projects,
but
it
makes
me
think
of
it.
We
had
yep
I
think
it
was
a
one
Summit.
D
Many
years
ago
we
put
together
essentially
many
conference
where
we
had
a
lot
of
different
projects,
speak
to
use
cases,
Telecom
use
cases
and
how
those
projects
could
be
used
to
solve
different
problems.
So
it
gave
it
context.
D
It
would
be
really
I,
think
nice
and
useful
if
we
had
different
representatives
from
all
these
different
projects
and
stuff
come
together
in
something
and
have
here's.
You
know
they
were
short
presentations
like
20
minutes,
I,
think
20,
30,
minutes,
shorter,
I
should
say,
and
something
like
that
being
able
to
speak
to
specific
use
cases
and
how
you
know,
give
people
an
idea,
but
it's
a
it's
a
big
undertaking,
even
Within
one
large
Foundation
or
where
you
have
a
lot
of
projects
to
get
them
to
talk.
E
D
We
do
have
overlap
with
some
Victor
has
spent
a
good
deal
of
time
over
in,
like
the
nephio
you
mentioned
Anakin
earlier,
we
have
experienced
collaboration,
work
there
and
representation.
Both
directions
happening,
the
project
Silva,
that's
a
the
Linux
Foundation
Europe
project.
D
They
have
there's
I,
guess
people
that
are
involved
in
that
which
were
either
and
some
in
the
past
directly
involved
with
some
of
these
other
groups
or
their
colleagues
or
someone
else.
So
there
is
overlap.
But
if,
if
we're
going
to
actually
have
a
a
landscape,
it
can
be
an
analysis
from
one
point
of
view,
but
if
you're
wanting
to
have
more
details
on
the
project-
and
it
would
be
good
to
have.
E
Just
a
maybe
a
smaller
scope,
to
start
with,
for
example,
like
like
network
service,
match
versus
notice,
this
options,
as
it's
for
me,
is
kind
of
a
kind
of
the
list.
E
I
don't
have
a
very
clear
idea,
you
know,
what's
the
use
use
cases
and
the
strong
point,
Etc
so
yeah
and
how
they
get
applied
to
what
Telecom,
whether
it's
Coral,
Edge
yeah
I,
think
it
might
be
good
to
even
just
reading
the
links
Foundation
your
Regency
on
CF,
what
what
is
the
available
Telecom
related
Solutions
in
the
network
area.
D
A
Well,
we
have
six
minutes
left,
so
I
I
would
like
to
keep
applying
to
others
any
other
into
this
calls
about
the
the
issues
or
any.
A
Well,
here
none
I
guess
we
have
covered
all
the
things
in
this
meeting,
so
we
can
continue
offline.
A
All
right,
I'm,
sorry,
one
for
participant,
and
we
will
see
you
next
week.