►
From YouTube: CNCF Storage WG Meeting - 2018-10-10
Description
Join us for Kubernetes Forums Seoul, Sydney, Bengaluru and Delhi - learn more at kubecon.io
Don't miss KubeCon + CloudNativeCon 2020 events in Amsterdam March 30 - April 2, Shanghai July 28-30 and Boston November 17-20! Learn more at kubecon.io. The conference features presentations from developers and end users of Kubernetes, Prometheus, Envoy, and all of the other CNCF-hosted projects
B
Fleshing
out
my
sections
so
that
a
few
hours
won't
work
to
do
to
get
to
get
them
in
a
decent
format,
but
but
for
the
later
on
today,
I'll
get
most
of
that
done
and
we
have
Singh
has
fallen
to
ICU.
Singh
has
volunteered
to
help
with
theta,
with
the
key/value
access
doors,
but
I
don't
haven't
had
any
interaction
with
him
specifically,
so
he
needs
to
invite
him
to
this
call
or
to
this
theta
something's
wrong
with
you
next
week,.
A
B
C
Will
I
just
started
working
on
the
block
this
morning
and
to
flush
it
out
this
week,
I've
got
I,
think
I'm,
starting
with
the
tables,
because
I
feel
like
I'm
filling
in
the
tables,
will
help
me
kind
of
fill
out.
You
know,
what's
what's
the
right
at
type
of
more
detail,
information
to
put
in
the
descriptions
and
I
went
through
the
first
some
of
the
block
table
this
morning
and
then
I
was
going
to
do
the
fosston
table
this
afternoon.
C
Is
there
time
for
me
they
kind
of
asked
feedback
on
on
with
one
quick
thing
in
the
block
table
to
see
what
people
think
sure
yeah
I
I,
guess
I'm
curious
on
on
how
we
think
that
this
should
hold
up
like
against
what
type
of
possibly
against
what
type
of
technology,
and
this
is
where
it
always
gets
more
subjective.
But
you
know
if
we
create
this
table.
I
look
at
one
box
right.
C
If
we
look
at
the
the
local
and
in
the
performance
box,
I
put,
as
you
know
in
that
box,
that
you
know
it's
limited
by
local
components
and
it
can
benefit
little
agency
applications.
I.
Think
that
the
obvious
statement
is
it's
limited
by
local
components,
but
it
sounds.
It
sounds
negative
and
the
way
that
that's
you
know
said,
but
in
reality
it
can
be
like
the
right
thing
like
and
so
I
tied
in
with
that
subjective
statement
of
like
hey.
This
can
be
good
for
certain
apps.
A
Yeah
I
don't
feel
too
strongly
about
it.
I
mean
it
does
strike
me
that
each
one
of
the
cells
in
that
table
could
justify
a
whole
paragraph,
almost
ready,
as
you
say,
there's
quite
a
bit
more
to
say
there
about
performance
of
local
disks
and
maybe
maybe
that's
something
we
want
to
add
in
the
second
pass
or
you
know
later,
I
think
what
you
have
in
that
particular
cell
right
now.
A
Is
it's
good
enough
for
the
size
of
the
cell
I'm
sure
it
could
be
done
differently
or
better,
but
we
had
limited
space,
and
the
intention
at
this
table
was
that
you
could
scan
through
it
and
you
could
tell
what
is
how
does
the
difference
or
how
does
the
performance
of
local
versus
remote?
This
is
distributed
box
stores
compared
I
can
just
read.
You
know
three
sentences
in
the
bottom
row
of
the
table
and
I
get
a
reasonable
idea
of
some
generalities
that
may
apply.
A
C
A
C
A
C
So
my
expectation
is
that
all
I'll
be
working
through
this
and
I
think
I'll
skip
over
to
the
mass
table
and
then
I'll
start
writing
more
details
and
the
descriptions
in
the
appropriate
sections
so
I
feel
like
it
all,
makes
a
good
progress
this
week.
B
B
C
B
B
We
we
do
have
so
we
have
one
more
session
on
the
18th
of
October
and
then
we're
sending
out
to
Commons
to
the
wider
to
the
storage
record
group
on
the
26th.
So
we
do.
We
want
to
try
and
three
want
to
try
and
target
the
18th
or
the
19th
as
the
as
when
we
send
out
the
emails
that
we
give
a
few
days
to
Elaine's
feedback
and
we
can
discuss
at
the
working
group.
B
A
Would
love
to
target
that
date,
I'm
just
whizzing
through
the
document
it's
difficult
to
read
it
cuz
cuz.
It
changes
every
time.
I
read
it
so
not
quite
sure
which
path
I
read,
but
it
strikes
me
there's
a
lot
of
content
missing
still
and
maybe
that's
just
subjective,
but
so
volumes.
Are
you
doing
that
this
week?
Flint
did
you
say.
B
B
D
A
B
B
C
B
Like
that,
it
was
like
who's
assigned
to
that.
This
is
no.
This
is
this.
Is
me
I'm
gonna
fill
in
this
yeah,
so
you
had
the
blocks
in
the
file
system.
Section
correct
check
the
storage
layers.
That's
me
as
well,
and
I'm
filling
in
these
sections.
I
think
I
need
there's
about
probably
half
the
page
of
contents
for
each
of
these.
That
I
need
to
finish
off
so
there's
six
sections
here
which
needs
filling
in
six
or
seven
sections.
B
D
B
D
B
D
B
A
A
We
only
mentioned
frameworks
that
are
in
the
CN
CF
or
we
have
to
say
we
only
mentioned
frameworks
that
called
called
some
other
properties,
or
we
have
limits
and
all
the
frameworks
that
people
want
mentioned
in
the
document
and
I
think
I'm
just
telling
you
that
you're
gonna
run
into
that
problem,
I'm
pretty
sure
they
know
what
it's
like
or
experience
and
I
have
with
us.
But
that
would
be
my
prediction.
B
We're
never
gonna
make
everybody
happy
here,
whether
it's
on
the
orchestration
and
so
the
framework
tools
or
whether
it's
and
the
examples
we
give
in
the
blog
section
or
in
the
file
system
section
or
at
your
text
or
section
I,
think
we
have
to
I
think
we
have
to
be
pragmatic
and
focus
on
some
of
the
some
of
the
main
things,
and
possibly
we
can
here's
the
CN
CF
landscape
as
sort
of
criteria
as
to
whether
read
with
would
stay
tuned
or
not,
but
again
you're
right.
We
can't
put
every
single
system
in
it's
it's.
C
Like
devil's
advocate
side
now,
people
like
if
we
took
certain
things
out,
people
are
gonna,
look
at
it
as
it
incompletely
possibly
enough
we're
describing
what's
going
on
cod
native,
we
don't
list
any
projects,
and
people
may
think
that
we're
just
missing
the
boat
completely
like
yes,
I,
think
we're
doing.
If
we
do,
then,
if
we
don't
on
any
side
of
it,
so
it's
really
tough
and
so
I
would
go
with
some
type
of
a
description
like
Quinton
and
suggested,
and
you
know
maybe
it's
the
Thera
ciencia
project.
C
D
A
A
C
C
C
A
D
B
We
can
never
debates
on
is
gonna,
definitely
make
this
right,
I,
don't
I,
don't
think.
That's
saying
that
it's
the
same
project
is
is
a
useful
criteria,
because
I
think
you
know
something
about
all
drug
stores,
and
you
know
not
mentioning
the
object.
Services
like
us,
three
or
whatever
it
from
from
providers,
is
kind
of
crazy,
so
so
I
would
strongly
focus
on
making
this
making
some
pragmatic
decisions.
So
we
choose
things
which
are
in
wine
to
use
to
some
definition
of
white
ears,
whatever
that
makes
sense,
but
not
be
discriminatory
I.
B
If
somebody
really
feels
that
their
project
should
be
included
well,
they
can
write
the
whole
paragraph
and
we
can
choose
to
include
those
other
features
for
the
link
to
it.
But
I,
don't
think
we
you
know,
I,
don't
think
we.
We
should
ignore
the
fact
that
the
audience
for
this
is
end
users
and
they
wants
to
be
able
to
find
out
what
the
pragmatic
solutions
are
right.
It's
the
son
of
act
is
this.
This
isn't
that
sort
of
being
the
most
fully
comprehensive
list,
and
it's
not
about
restricting
who
gets
into
the
document.
B
C
If
we
just
take
the
amount
well,
the
part
about
that
state
knowledge
which
worries
me
is
allowing
them
to
write
their
own
paragraph,
because
I
think
that
you
know
that
they
have
the
ability
to
stay
what
they
want,
and
then
it
can
turn
into
a
bunch
of
marketing.
And
then
we
have
to
go
back
and
forth
about
what
them
about
what
they're
gonna
say
and
I
mean
what,
if
we
just
break
down
the
the
current
storage
landscape,
that
we
have
published
by
a
CNC
F?
C
And
we
just
you
know,
list
like
where
those
projects
fit,
and
we
just
do
a
link
to
their
project
page.
So
we
take
the
kind
of
the
framework
of
you
know
whether
they're
a
framework,
an
interface.
It's
not
sharing
tool
and
we
just
classify.
We
have
on
landscape
and
provide
links
to
the
project
pages
to
get
the
description.
I.
A
Actually
prefer
Alex's
proposal
and
that's
essentially
what
I
was
trying
to
say
and
Alex
said
it
much
more
eloquently
than
I
did,
which
is
we
need
a
criteria.
Otherwise,
it's
random
and
we're
gonna
have
meaningless
arguments
with
people
about
why
we
included
one
and
not
another
thing.
So
the
the
criteria
that
alex
criterion
that
LX
suggested
is
most
widely
used
and
that's
objective.
A
The
following
are
some
of
the
most
widely
used
storage
systems,
and
then
we,
you
know,
perhaps
give
a
brief
description
about
each
one
and
then
one
way
of
doing
a
catch-all
for
the
rest
is
to
say
other
systems
that
we're
aware
of
are
the
follow
and
just
have
a
you
know,
a
list,
a
comma-separated
list
of
links
to
you
know
other
stuff.
So
and
if
anybody
wants
to
claim
that
their
thing
exists-
and
we
could
just
put
it
in
that
list
and
that
way,
they
can
feel
they've
been
included
in
the
doc.
A
A
C
Believe
in
like
the
the
source
and
I
was
thinking
about,
was
what
CN
CF
is
already
published.
I
wouldn't
say
everything,
but
if
they
anesthesia
has
decided
they
want
to
sing
on
the
landscape,
then,
and
you
know
we
can
tell
people
why
it's
all
landscape,
that's
the
only
thing
that
I
was
thinking
about,
and
so.
A
B
A
Yes,
so
I
think
we
have
a
duty
to
do
that
if
somebody
can
find
out
a
more
compelling
reason
why
the
landscape
is,
has
a
curation
as
to
what
gets
up
to
the
landscape
and
what
doesn't,
and
if
that
curation
principle
is.
These
are
commonly
used
things
that
people
want
to
know
about,
then
we
can
use
it
I,
don't
think
that
is
the
criterion
and
practice,
and
so
therefore,
we
should
just
do
a
our
own
one.
A
C
A
B
B
B
So
then
we
have,
you
know
a
box
store
section
which
which
currently
is
filling
in
and
we
have
the
file
systems,
and
then
we
have
the
object
stores.
So
can
somebody
remind
me
only
Devon
was
doing
that
the
objects
are
opting
him
and
then
of
being
seen
as
well
parens
the
key
value
stores
we
agreed
last
time,
then
that's
the
today.
Today's
section
will
probably
take
care
of
the
first
version
of
the
draft,
see.
D
D
A
I
did
already,
and
he
did
reply
to
it
and
he
did
copy
you
on
the
reply.
So
maybe
it's
actually
easier.
If
you
just
chase
him
up,
reading
being
sort
of
coordinating
all
the
people
and
getting
the
doc
finished
side,
I
want
to
be
out
on
the
side.
Roads
somewhere,
see
I
just
reply
to
that
email
that
you
copied
on
and
I've,
given
the
timelines
and
deadlines
and
things.
Okay,.
B
A
B
A
Yeah
I
guess
my
my
big
concern
is
that
the
actual
body
of
the
doc
is
largely
empty.
There
were
many
pages
we
scrolled
past
there
that
are
completely
empty
and
I'm
becoming
increasing
in
or
even
Erickson's
may,
I
guess
and
arguably
the
really
important
parts
are
totally
missing
so
yeah.
We
just
need
to
it's
not
unachievable
in
the
next
week,
but
we're
rapidly
running
out
of
time.
B
C
C
C
C
B
B
A
B
A
No
I
was
just
I
was
thinking
of
personally
actually
reading
through
the
doc
like
the
day
before
next
Thursday,
but
because
by
then
it
should
be
mostly
complete
and
largely
in
the
state
that
it
will
be
when
we
sent
it
out
to
the
rest
of
the
group.
But
I
was
also
wondering
whether
yeah
I
mean
we
need
to
have
some
internal
real
review
before
we
send
it
out.
I
think
so.
A
Maybe
others
want
to
do
roughly
the
same
thing
just
go
through
all
the
content
as
it
is,
ideally
as
it
is
by
next
Wednesday,
but
you
might
only
append
for
that
and
at
least
make
sure
that
you're
comfortable
with
what's
in
the
document,
so
all
provide
any
input.
If
this
egregious
stuff
there
I
think
there
is,
but
you
know,
I
haven't
read
it
all
in
detail.
All
I've
really
been
doing
is
keeping
track
of
roughly
what's
been,
and
what's
not
done
and
I
flipped
through
the
first
draft.
But
it's
changed
a
lot
since
then.