►
From YouTube: CNCF SIG Storage 2020-01-22
Description
CNCF SIG Storage 2020-01-22
B
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
A
A
Things
that's
selling
to
be
added,
consistently
consistency
and
eventual
consistency.
Do
we
need
to
discuss
that
versus
partition,
tolerance?
So
there's
a
bunch
of
unopened
questions
unanswered
questions
in
here
that
I
think
we
need
to
address.
Maybe
we
can
put
a
timeline
on
dressing
those
in
the
next
two
week.
I,
don't
think
rushing
to
finish
this
when
it
looks
like
there's
still
a
lot
of
open
questions
is
appropriate,
so
I'm
going
to
just
put
a
check
point
that
we
review
at
least
the
considering
these
bullet
points
at
the
very
end
of
the
document.
A
D
C
C
D
I
remember
Louise
and
Alex
said
they
are
going
to
have
a
meeting
to
sync
up
on
the
use
case
document
just
sorted
out
so
that
his
PR
can
be
merged
because
Louise's
PR
has
been
there
for
quite
a
while.
There
are
a
lot
of
comments.
I
thought
they
are
going
to
have
a
meeting
between
the
two
of
them
to
sort
out
things,
but
their.
E
D
E
A
D
E
E
A
We
have
a
pretty
small
attendance
today
Alex,
so
we
don't
really
have
an
update
from
the
database
additions.
There
are
a
bunch
of
bullets
at
the
very
end
for
possible
suggestions.
Clinton
suggested.
Maybe
we
talk
about
you
know,
limiting
scope,
I
think
that's
reasonable,
so
we
can
get
a
version.
One
published
and
I
put
that.
Maybe
we
could
publish
that
by
cube
Connie
you
so
that's
n
de
much
yeah.
E
So,
just
a
quick
update
on
that
soup,
you
had
prepared
to
talk
enough,
just
reviewed
it
and
I'm
and
I've
just
created
a
quick
comparison
table.
I
just
want
to
write
in
so
what
I'd
like
to
suggest
is
that
we
that
we
move
the
contents
that
stupid
created
into
the
white
paper
doc
into
the
storage,
landscape,
doc
and
and
and
republish
the
storage
landscape
as
a
version
two
of
that
doc
and
this
time
gets
get
the
CNC
acted
to
sort
of
run
their
marketing
engine
over
that.
E
The
documents
on
the
website
now
for
that
I
was
just
going
to
quickly
ask
maybe
fishing
if
you
have
some
time
to
to
just
give
a
quick
review
of
the
of
the
currents,
storage,
landscape,
dock
specifically
around
as
the
management
interfaces,
because
I
was
just
reapz
going
through
it's
just
to
make
sure
everything
was
still
up
to
scratch
and
I
think
the
management
interface
is
where
we
talk
about.
You
know,
flex
volumes
and
docker
volume,
plus
I
could
see
things
like
that.
E
A
I
would
love
it
if
I
mean
we
don't
I,
don't
think
we
have
I
mean
we
have
the
comments
in
here,
of
course,
in
the
doc,
but
Alex
I
think
we
need,
like
a
minimum
number
of
tech,
leads
and
co-chairs
to
also
review
it
and
to
notate
that
within
the
document.
So
we
have
consensus
because
it
doesn't
quite
it's
gotten
unless
the
enlist
of
comets
have
all
been
resolved.
I
I
think
it
would
be
worthwhile
to
to
kindly
ask
that
we
all
review
it
in
depth
and
provide
in
approval
chain
yeah.
E
F
A
E
I
I
think
I
think
we
we
should
be
able
to
do
it
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
Honestly,
the
comments
the
super
has
sort
of
reworked
the
doc
based
on
the
comments
already
and
I've
already
gone
through
through
it,
and
it
does
look,
it
does
look
fairly
fairly
ready.
I
think
we
just
need
to
add
one
table
which
which
I'm
just
gonna
suggest,
but
you
know
just
moving
out
and
I
think
we're.
E
Okay,
then
so,
assuming
there
aren't
any
other
sort
of
major
comment
items
I
think
we
can
merge
it
into
the
V
to
talk
into
the
V
to
landscape
talk
and
then,
if
we
updates
the
the
management
interface
section
just
to
sort
of
bring
it
up
to
to
make
it
current,
then
I
think
we're
kind
of
done
on
that.
So
it's
a
lot
would
be
a
nice
thing
to
have
for
a
keeper.
C
C
A
very
good
idea
perhaps
start
getting
the
marketing
machinery
moving.
In
the
meantime,
we
can
have
them
a
final
draft
in
two
weeks
time
it
sounds
like
and
then
hopefully
we
can
have
some
of
the
marketing
stuff
released
well
before
cube
cons,
so
the
by
the
time
people
get
to
keep
from
they've
read
yep.
E
A
E
Yes,
that's
right,
I
did
also
have
another.
Just
another
quick
update,
so
I
took
on
sort
of
would
suddenly
take
intro
to
review
to
the
Dragonfly
project
and
provide
some
some
something
back
because
she
hang
on
to
talk
about.
If,
if
we
could,
if
we
could
produce
and
feedback,
so
I
went
through
and
rereads
the
presentation
that
they
had
given
us
and
went
through
the
YouTube
video
I
also
spent
some
time
so
they've
been
storing
it
and
doing
some
basic
testing.
E
E
E
And
I
think
I
think
we
can
cross
that
off
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
action
points
so
I
will
I
will
I
will
raise
those
points
on
the
PR.
It
would
be
nice,
it's
just
somebody
double-check
the
points
that
I
raised
and
make
just
make
sure
I
wasn't
saying
anything
to
obviously
ridiculous,
but
I
think
we
can
close
that
off
and
I.
Also
then
notice
that
Michael
Michael
is
on
the
call.
So
we
we
have
had
a
request
to
help
with
the
to
help
with
the
graduation
of
of
Harbor.
E
Now
Harbor
is
is
a
very
complex
project
through
the
lot
of
living
parts
and
there
was
consensus
to
maybe
split
science
different
components
of
the
project
to
be
reviewed
by
by
different
stakes,
the
first
secret
that
the
review
was
the
was
to
seek
runtime
I
believe
a
few
days
ago.
That
is
correct
Alex.
So
it's
the
so
Michael
since
you're
on
the
call.
We
just
said
that
maybe
you
just
give
us
a
brief
outline
of
what
we
think
is
needed,
we're
and
then
maybe
in
the
next
meeting
we
might,
we
might
shed.
F
So
John
was
the
initial
person
that
did
the
reviewed
our
due
diligence
talk
from
from
the
TOC
and
you
know,
I,
don't
know
who
got
the
thumbs
up
or
not,
but
you
know
he
agreed
with
the
content
that
was
there
and
called
the
DD
solid.
So
now
the
next
step
was
to
look
at
sick,
runtime,
sick
storage,
as
well
as
potential
security
to
also
go
ahead
and
beat
our
documentation
that
you
have
provided
and
give
some
answers
in
due
diligence
document
that
Quinton
created.
So
what
you're?
F
Looking
for
from
from
the
from
from
your
interest
group
is
potentially
a
point
person
that
would
be
the
dedicate
some
of
their
time
to
go
through
both
the
due
diligence
document,
which
is
about
30
pages
some
diagrams
in
there,
but
definitely
a
lot
of
content
and
and
start
looking
into
you.
If
there
is
anything
that
storage
has
questions,
concerns
or
or
anything
that
they
want
to
discuss
further
and
potentially
deep
dive
into
that
so
circus.
F
That
that's
the
first
step,
we're
more
than
happy
to
show
up
at
your
next
meeting
and
do
a
short
presentation
on
Harbor
already
done
in
a
couple
of
times,
so
other
you
guys
might
be
able
to
get
it
from
the
TOC
meeting
as
well.
But
we
don't
have
a
problem
to
to
show
up
it's
up
to
you
guys
in
terms
of
how
you
want
to
proceed.
C
C
F
Good
enduring
the
you
know,
it
was
yeah.
It
was
bad
timing
because
you
had
Kubek
on
then
there
was
Thanksgiving
and
Christmas
holiday
season,
so
we're
just
picking
it
up
right
now,
making
sure
that
you
know
we
basically
do
our
finish.
A
due
diligence
so
can
go
back
to
the
TOC,
either
a
thumbs
up
or
thumbs
down
or
whatever
ends
up
happening.
E
F
E
Okay,
so
so
we'll
we
need
to
find
quality
exactly
it's
that
that
can
that
can
have
a
look
at
the
document
from
a
from
us
from
a
storage
perspective,
and
then
perhaps,
if
there
are,
if
there
are
questions,
I
mean
honestly.
Even
if
there
aren't
questions
it
might
be
a
good
idea
Michael
if
we
could
for
the
next
six
door
each
meeting
if
we
could,
if
we
could
share,
maybe
a
like
a
twenty
minutes
or
half
an
hour
presentation
to
just
go
through
it.
C
A
C
C
E
E
H
So
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
asking
for
work
is
to
be
able
to
have
them
put
in
a
request
for
review
from
you
guys.
So
at
this
point
it's
basically
kind
of
up
to
the
projects
to
be
able
to
come
to
you
and
be
able
to
say,
hey
we'd
like
you
to
review
us.
If
you
want
to
be
able
to
change
that,
if
you
want
to
make
it
slightly
more
scheduled,
we
can,
but
at
the
moment
I'm
kind
of
leaving
it
towards
whenever
the
projects
think
they're
ready
for
review.
Okay,.
H
A
A
E
So
so
then,
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
on
the
benchmarking
and
performance,
so
that
did
sort
of
stole
over
Christmas
we've
started
to
put
some
work
into
it
and
I'm
hoping
the
certainty
of
McConnell
is
just
your
blinds.
We're
hoping
to
have
I
call
this
week
to
to
sort
of
jump
start
the
document
again
so
hopefully
we'll
have
an
update
for
the
meeting.
E
E
A
E
Because,
ironically,
one
of
the
one
of
the
other
things
that
that
subbu
did
as
part
of
the
database
document
is
actually
write
up,
quite
a
chronic
current
section
of
what
I
would
say
should
go
into
the
database
use
case
example,
so
I
I'm
thinking.
We
can
actually
have
like
a
database
case
example
as
a
as
a
template
using
using
all
of
that
content.
So
we
should.
We
should
try
with
our
favorite.
A
E
H
So
I'm
actually
pulling
together
Mike's
pieces
for
that
today
and
part
of
that
is
being
able
to
have
a
week.
Sorry,
a
monthly,
not
a
weekly
call
around
space
for
both
the
TOC
members
and
the
sig
chairs
and
conversations
about
hey.
What
is
our
process
anyways
like
being
able
to
review?
We've
got
a
couple
different
kind
of
project
flow
charts
right
now
with
like
how
do
we
get
towards
like
being
able
to
have
each
so?
H
You
have
the
same
answer
so
that's
part
of
the
agenda
tomorrow,
as
well
and
frankly,
any
other
items
of
business
that
all
of
you
want
to
be
able
to
cover
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
had
like
a
scheduled
time
to
be
able
to
meet
for
that
and
that'll
be
repeating
every
month
on
the
fourth
Thursday
good
overview.
Anything
else.
C
E
H
Of
it
is
also
just
being
able
to
surface
questions
that
have
come
up
as
we've
gone
through
the
process
of
being
able
to
form
saying
this
like,
for
example,
one
question
is:
do
we
have
process
of
performing
working
groups
and
like
within
the
SIG's,
and
the
answer
right
now
is
no?
No,
we
really
don't
I
know
people
want
to
do
that,
that's
cool!
H
E
Okay,
so
actually
I
just
didn't,
have
one
last
updates,
then
or
one
last
question
for
the
group.
So
we
have
a
number
of
the
sponsors
and
end
users
are
reorganizing.
The
planet
of
storage
day
in
for
the
amsterdam
cube
con
and
I'm
working
on
putting
some
of
the
content
together
and
sort
of
content
plan
for
it.
E
For
the
for
the
group
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
I'd
really
like
to
do
is
is
it's
perhaps
for
the
sake
or
or
some
community
members
to
to
have
either
somebody
talks
or
a
full
sort
of
half
an
hour
session
to
to
go
through,
perhaps
an
update
in
cns
day.
So
I
was
wondering
if,
if
anybody
had
any
any
specific
ideas
which
which
we
could
discuss
now,
otherwise
maybe
razors
ideas
in
the
in
the
in
the
mail
eNOS
on
the
slack
Channel,
and
it
would
be
really
good
to
have
some
some
representation.
E
I
know
that
there
are
some
sort
of
logistical
issues,
because
there's
obviously
are
a
number
of
sort
of
communities
they
faced
faces
and
things
like
that
which
which
are
happening
at
the
same
time
but
I
think
I.
Think
if
we
can
get
the
CNCs
a
to
to
be
represented
and
maybe
talk
about
the
updated
landscape
documents
or
talk
about,
maybe
you
know
to
benchmark
documents
or
the
use
case-
supplements,
for
example,
that
are
in
play,
or
even
just
to
give
maybe
an
overview
of
the
projects.
That's
that's.
A
And
it
might
be
worthwhile
if
we
would
go
back
and
maybe
look
at
some
of
the
questions
that
were
asked
in
San
Diego
to
make
sure
you
know,
we've
addressed
those
from
the
last
time.
I
don't
know,
I
mean
I,
think
I
think
we
should
do
if
we
have
a
use
case.
Talk
and
I
think
it's
ready.
I
think
that
would
be
immensely
helpful
because
that
was
I
asked
I
was
asked
that
question
many
many
times
how
do
I
even
get
started?
What
am
what
do
I
know
to
use
and
not
just
for
storage.
A
You
know
I
heard
that
in
a
lot
of
talks
and
if
we
can
give
an
update
on
the
landscape.
Well,
I
think
those
are
all
great
ideas,
but
yeah
we
could
collaborate
in
the
slack
channel
and
everyone
can
weigh
in
I've
added
those
two
suggestions
to
the
agenda,
but
people
who
have
edit
rights
please
feel
free
to
drop
things
in
there.
You
think
we
should
cover.