►
From YouTube: TAG General Meeting - 2023-03-01
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Ever
since
I
got
logged
in
properly
to
our
Zoom
account,
I
get
a
lot
more
functionality.
When
I
sign
in
here
I
can
pause.
The
recording
I
can
it
gives
me
tag
up.
Delivery
is
my
name
when
I
sign
on.
A
C
Yeah,
it
almost
gives
him
a
couple
of
minutes
to
join.
You
have
the
meeting
notes
in
the
chat
feel
free
to
add
yourself
to
the
list
of
attendees
I
have
to
excuse
most
African
Ultra
and
join
the
first
half
of
the
meeting
today
for
personal
reasons,
but
there's
already
Jennifer
here
as
well
with
other
hosts.
C
Yeah
just
quickly
looking
at
the
agenda,
what
do
we
have
planned
for
today,
obviously
of
the
agenda
document
in
the
future?
If
you
want
to
discuss
something,
if
you
just
added
to
the
agenda
document
ahead
of
time,
first
one
is
discussing
application
definitions
which
yeah
I
will
briefly
speak
about.
C
Then
we
have
the
review
for
clue,
CTL
I,
hope,
I
pronounced
it
properly
and
then
our
cubecon
activities,
if
you
have
planned
for
kubecon
EU,
to
give
some
updates
and
where
we
stand
on
those
yeah
I'd
then
like
to
kick
it
off
and
make
the
first
part
actually
brief
that
we
have
enough
time
for
the
organizational
topics.
C
So
in
the
agenda,
you
will
find
a
link
to
something
that
actually
started
out
as
a
blog
post,
initially
for
some
of
them
for
a
topic
that
we
kind
of
ran
into
and
then
I
shared
it
with
the
tech
app
delivering
other
people,
and
it
then
eventually
triggered
more
interest.
Then
I
initially
anticipated.
C
So
what
is
the
proposal
basically
about?
As
the
name
suggests,
the
question
is:
does
kubernetes
need
or
why
we
think
kubernetes
needs
an
application
object
or
the
kubernetes
API
is
an
application
object
code
background
on
this
one.
When
we
were
working
we
found
out
well,
you
have
deployments
available
in
other
components.
C
Their
is
no
distinct
object
that
defines
all
the
components
and
application
really
consists
of
like
an
overall
description.
This
is
everything
that
makes
up
an
application.
There
are
certain
approaches
that
are
available
today.
One
is
obviously
the
well-defined
or
the
recommended
labels
in
kubernetes
by
the
way
enough
figured
out
who
was
actually
working
on
it.
It's
actually,
our
TLC
liaison
was
a
Metro
Arena.
Who
who
worked
on
this
and
provided
me
some
input
already
on
this
one
and
also
share
the
document
with
him.
C
There
are
some
challenges
with
the
labels.
The
first
one
like
we
ran
into
also
from
an
observability
perspective.
It's
not
really
possible
to
figure
out
whether
actually
all
components
have
been
deployed
successfully.
C
C
Something
was
not
possible
to
reuse
like
components
and
services
between
different
application
versions
and
you'd
like
really
need
to
go
like
each
an
individual
component
in
there.
There's
other
approaches
that
some
of
them
are
already
listed
in
the
document
like
over.
There
is
something
like
an
application
definition
Argo,
which
points
to
repo,
but
then
it
pretty
much
assumes
that
the
application
definition
exists
outside
of
kubernetes,
but
you
kind
of
don't
know
it
inside
of
a
community.
That's
an
easy
way
to
clearly
to
link
metrics
to
it
as
well.
C
Also
one
example
like
I
want
to
get
the
health
of
an
application,
is
an
application
healthy
or
unhealthy,
or
even
want
to
react
by
events
to
certain
things
in
the
life
cycle
like
when
is
an
application.
C
Health
is
a
very
good
one
and
and
relatively
scheduled,
think
of
like
Readiness
and
health
probes,
but
like
on
the
bigger
scale
that
you
could
subscribe
to
and
and
interact
with
and
yeah
long
story
short
is.
There
are
certain
approaches.
We
think
this
could
actually
mean
more
work.
C
There's
also
now
a
link
in
there
to
the
to
seek
apps
that
was
working
on
this
a
while
back,
but
that
works
then
kind
of
stalled
at
some
point
and
well
what
started
Mother's
house
as
a
out
as
a
blog
post,
initially
now
became
something
that
more
people
are
interested
in
and
for
me
this
is
like
really
testing
the
voters.
Is
this
something
other
people
think
does
make
sense
as
well.
C
Do
you
see
that
this
problem
exists
so
I
think
it
is
actually
solved,
not
really
a
problem
that
you're?
Having
or
just
do
you
have
other
ideas
about
it?
How
do
we
want
to
to
further
advice
forward?
This
is
pretty
much
a
working
document
so
feel
free
to
comment
on
it.
Give
it
a
reason:
I'm
not
expecting,
obviously
make
it
open
and
say:
q,
a
here
I'm
not
expecting
everybody
to
read
it
right
now.
So
that's
maybe
something
to
collect
the
feedback
in
the
next
tech
meeting.
Then
yeah.
D
So
I'm
wondering:
what's
the
scope
of
that
object
would
be,
would
it
be
just
monitoring
and
grouping,
or
would
it
also
do
something
with
the
grouped
resources
that
belong
to
that
application?
So
would
it
need
a
controller
that
does
something
or
would
it
be
just
a
grouping
for
yes
at
monitoring.
C
The
way
we
are
using
it
right
now,
but
we
mean
the
team
up
the
captain
project,
because
we
have
an
implementation
of
this.
It
does
actually
those
it's
only
one
and
monitoring
like
one
thing.
It
enables
us
to
do
as
well
as
create
a
trades
and
say
that
some
components,
for
example,
fail
to
install,
but
we
also
take
care,
for
example,
by
even
like
having
a
control
and
even
looking
into
a
scheduler,
because
you
might
be,
you
might
want
it
to
have
certain
things
executed
in
a
certain
order.
C
For
example,
You
could
argue
you
don't
need
it
in
kubernetes
if
the
part's
not
ready
and
doesn't
work,
it
crashes.
Yes,
but
it's
not
nice
to
have
a
login
service
crash
just
because
the
SSL
certificate
is
not
yet
ready.
You
could
have
waited
two
or
three
minutes
we're
also
using
the
events
like
that.
The
workload
is
ready
to,
for
example,
check
to
like
run
a
synthetic
test
and
check
whether
it's
actually
working
think
about
it.
C
That
way,
you
want
to
do
an
end-to-end
test
of
all
the
components,
and
you
want
to
verify
whether
your
login
is
working
which
goes
across
15
services.
So
you
want
to
wait
until
everything
is
like
kind
of
up
and
running
so
to
also
create
events
there,
and
do
also
the
same
that
you
might
like
postpone
the
scheduling
or
even
intercept
it
like
you'll
realize.
C
Okay,
you
want
to
upgrade
an
application,
but
the
current
version
that
you're
running
is
not
healthy
right
now
or
you
might
even
run
into
constraints
like
one
version
will
be
using
it
here
outside
of
your
allowed
SLO
of
your
outside
outside
low.
So
now
it's
actually
not
a
good
time
to
deploy
or
or
otherwise
reasons
why
I
want
to
do
it.
So
the
the
short
answer
is
both.
C
D
Sounds
interesting,
it
would
just
be
a
little
bit
worried
that
too
much
stuff
get
into
get
it
gets
involved.
For
example,
you
mentioned
the
the
schedule
already,
since
there
could
be
a
lot
of
stuff
that
would
have
to
interact
which
usually
doesn't
interact
with
the
kubernetes
set
up
or
just
some
random
thoughts.
Yeah.
C
I
mean
we
started
out
honestly
really
with
observability
and
just
knowing
which
components
are
there,
and
at
least
assigning
health
checks
with
them
just
think
about
it.
This
way,
this
is
something
you
would
immediately
want
to
do
like
give
me
a
health
check
for
when
I
think
that
whole
thing
is
actually
there
yeah.
D
C
There's
like
four
blue
green
diploma
that
want
to
switch
over
I
think
we
have
kind
of
taken
it
to
an
extreme
and
I
think
we
are
not
yet
at
the
point
to
see
what
the
application
definition
is
all
should
be
capable
of
actually
doing,
but
health
checks
for
me
are
I,
think
a
very
natural
like
health
checks
and
Readiness
checks
on
the
scale
it
goes
beyond
the
single
service
would
be
something
that's
really
going
to
be
useful.
There.
C
Answer
it
depends
from
what
we
learned
in
the
past.
We
were
like
very
much
looking
into
like
limiting
stuff
to
name
spaces,
realizing
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
always
work
yeah,
especially
when
you
have
shared
services
and
shared
components,
then
you
would
have
to
actually
go
beyond
namespace
boundaries.
F
E
C
G
C
Think
of
the
episode
party
service
that
you're
using
say
you.
We
created
a
dnf
route
which
is
kind
of
part
of
our
application,
but
maybe
not
under
our
control,
we'll
be
using
a
third
party
server
which
we're
using
a
messaging
service
that's
used
by,
but
as
well.
We
needed
to
have
the
application
work
properly,
but
we're
not
even
responsible
for
actually
deploying
it.
So
you
might
even
say
this
application
cannot
be
deployed
because
certain
prerequisites
in
the
classes
do
not
even
exist.
C
C
Okay,
so
the
application
America
could
be
a
simple
synthetic
test
and
also
checking
okay
if
they
have
a
dependency
on
it's
another
service
that
is
running
in
that
cluster
or
might
even
be
running
totally
externally.
I
think,
okay,
this
service
is
not
available
to
the
entire
application.
Kind
of
is
not
ready
to
work
right
now.
E
F
E
D
Another
thing
that
came
to
my
mind
is:
is
application
the
correct
name
for
that,
because
it
I
would
assume
that
it's
not
always
an
application
that
you
are
talking
about,
that
you
want
to
group
together.
D
C
Yeah,
maybe
that's
another
name,
it's
just
started
off
these
applications
for
the
time
being.
C
Now
there
was
already
Works
we're
not
the
first
ones
ever
thinking
about
it,
because
they're
I
think
there's
a
link
in
the
document,
and
there
is
a
link
in
the
document,
but
it's
not
in
the
agenda
about
the
work
that
was
actually
done
by
cgaps,
but
I
think
it's
an
awkward
question
I
think
they're
all
very
valid.
C
C
C
C
The
deflux
is
not
going
to
use
it
if
it's
not
being
used
as
part
for
also,
maybe
that's
part
of
service
mesh
just
depending
on
what
we
want
to
Define,
then
it's
not
going
to
be
super
helpful,
yeah
backstage
as
well
and
then
and
address
so
that's
but
I
think
right
now
it's
only
agreement.
Yes,
this
is
the
pro.
This
is
the
problem.
We
agree
that
actually
exists.
We
equated
existing
Solutions
are
not
exactly
what
we
want
them
to
be,
or
we
need
them
to
be
to
evolve,
and
then
we
take
it
from
there.
A
Eloise,
because
backstage
has
this
concept
of
an
entity
which
is
declared
statically
with
like
a
catalog
info
in
your
repo
and
then
basically
it
you
know
you
put
down
that
one
anchor
and
then
it
crawls
the
rest
of
your
kubernetes
stuff.
But
if
we
it's
not
the
best
source
of
Truth,
maybe
I
don't
know.
We
could
debate
that.
But
if
we
added
applications
back
in
kubernetes,
you
know
backstage
could
create
an
entity
based
on
that
it'll
be
kind
of
nifty
I.
E
Think
that's
the
heart
of
of
our
problem
right
now,
because
we
use
Argo
CD
we
use
backstage.
So
we
now
have
two
definitions
for
the
same
thing
and
we
have
the
backside
entity.
We
have
the
August
application.
We
have
the
GitHub
repository
itself,
Visa
Helm
chart
and
we
have
synthetics
checks
somewhere
else
completely,
not
in
line
with
that
and
yeah
like
a
lot
of
projects
solve
that
problem,
but
they
won't
glue
that
together.
C
Philosophy
like
to
post
them
in
there
as
well
again
I
shared
a
document
right
now
to
not
have
like
too
many
editors
on
it.
If
you
want
edit
right
simply
request
them,
I
just
want
to
make
it
publicly
editable,
because
this
makes
tracking,
usually
a
bit
hard
I
mean
you
can
obviously
propose
changes,
but
if
you
think
you
want
to
like
edit
something
in
just,
let
me
know,
and
you
get
edit
right.
F
C
Yeah,
let's
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
time,
bring
your
questions,
throw
in
some
of
your
comments
and
we'll
prepare
in
a
more
detailed
discussion
on
this
one
right
now,
which
is
already
a
good
sign.
If
it
would
be
all
clear
and
everybody
would
say
yeah,
why
are
we
even
talking
about
this?
So
go
for
a
step.
C
A
Was
added
I
guess
just
to
introduce
you
Alex
this,
the
the
the
technical
oversight
committee
reviewed
sandbox
projects
yesterday
and
they.
A
Recommendations
for
Alex
so
he's
coming
to
us
to
just
briefly
talk,
because
it
was
last
minute
so
yeah.
D
Yeah,
so
the
current
state
of
the
project
is
I
submitted
an
application
to
as
a
Sandbox
project.
D
C
D
That's
what
I
wanted
to
bring
to
this
meeting
today
and
regarding
reapplication
I,
said
I
will
reapproach
cncf
and
ctag
app
delivery
in
the
future.
Regarding
that.
F
A
F
C
D
Yeah
I
tried
to
I
tried
to
document
it
as
as
good
as
possible,
try
to
split
it
up
and
commit
all
the
different
changes.
D
There's
a
test
also
running,
so
it
does
all
this
stuff
automatically
while
running
the
workflow.
If
you
have
questions
or
it's
not
running
for
whatever
reason
locally.
Just
being
me.
C
And
any
other
help
from
Tech
at
delivery
like
regarding
the
sandbox
application,
it
was
I,
didn't
watch
the
last
sandbox
meeting
to
be
fair.
What's
the
main,
what
were
the
main
questions
really
about
that?
Getting
contributors.
D
Yeah,
so
it's
two
things:
one
thing
is
getting
adopters.
This
is
happening
slowly,
of
course,
it's
still
a
fresh
project
and
bound
to
that
is
also
contributors.
So
I'm
doing
all
this
alone,
I,
don't
kind
of
have
a
company
behind
me
to
promote
it
to
other
colleagues
or
something
like
that,
so
it's
of
course
hard
to
get
contributors.
So
if
stuff
changes,
if
more
people
come
in
I'll
reapply.
A
D
D
C
I
think
what
we
could
do
if
we
want
to
like
do
then,
maybe
next
time
to
like
a
short
10
minute,
maybe
walk
through,
like
even
of
the
Potato
Head
example,
because
obviously
the
meeting
recordings
are
sent
out
and
not
everybody
can
obviously
join
the
meetings
due
to
like
another
time,
commitments
that
people
have
yeah,
then
we
like,
we
have
the
Twitter
account
like
we
could
share
it
out
as
well.
Maybe
it
was
okay.
This
was
presented,
so
that
gives
you
at
least
more
visibility
that
that
you
have
right
now.
C
I
think,
there's
nothing
like
against
doing
this
and
finding
people
that
help
on
the
project
who
might
be
interested
in
sharing.
It
is
also
what
what
we
can
do
as
a
tech
to
support
you
I
would
just
keep
it
short
because
people
don't
watch
like
half
an
hour
type
of
presentation,
usually.
D
C
So
you
have
to
get
them
excited
in
10
minutes,
and
then
we
have
like
almost
like
catching
two
birds
with
one
stone
like
we
have
like
a
review
of
the.
We
see
the
Potato
Head
example
that
they're
running
and
at
the
same
time
you
have
a
video
where
you
can
showcase
the
project
again
in
a
way
that
you're
also
like
confident
within
sharing
with
the
entire
internet.
D
Yeah
I'm
comfortable
with
that
I
there's.
If
people
are
already
interested
there
is
a
video
recording.
We
see
rockhold
Academy
YouTube
channel
I
linked
it
in
the
agenda
when
we
did
the
November
call
so
whatever
so
you
can
look
it
up
there,
but
yeah.
It's
just
I
just
need
to
prepare.
That's
what
I
learned
from
the
last
time.
D
H
Yes,
so
many
of
many
of
us
are
are
at
cucumbers
here
so
in
in
Amsterdam,
and
we
as
a
tag
we
applied
for
several
activities.
So
at
first
we
applied
for
a
project
meeting
which
is
approved,
so
we
will
have
for
our
project
meeting
where
we
can
discuss
some
things.
H
The
the
second
thing
we
have
is,
we
will
have
a
booth,
so
there
will
be
a
problem
of
ours
in
the
maintenance
base
and
there's
some
some
people
of
us
should
be
there
to
to
be
able
to
talk
with
the
people
and
and
so
on.
And
the
third
thing
we
also
have
is
is
a
maintainer
track.
Talk
where
Jennifer
George
and
me
will
talk
about
anything
we
are
doing
here.
H
Hopefully,
yes,
so
there's
much
much
things
about
around
cubecon
and
what
I
would
like
to
discuss
today
is
what
what
you
so
every
one
of
you
would
expect
from
a
pack
to
do
at
at
a
project
meeting
or
on
the
booth.
So
what
would
you
like
to
see
there
because
then
we
can
plan
it
somehow
and
if
you
want
to
volunteer
for
some
of
the
activities
you
always
read.
Also,
we
are
also
more
than
happy
to
see
you
there
Josh
I,
think
you
have
had
years
around
around
magic
meeting
right.
A
Yeah
I
put
a
bunch
of
stuff
down
in
both
areas.
I've
been
thinking
about
this
a
lot
yeah
because
because
we
could
I
mean
I
love
these
events
because
they
like
it's
like
you
all,
are
my
co-workers
and
I.
Don't
ever
get
to
see
you
and
here's
the
one
chance
and
it
you
really
facilitates
work
later
in
the
year.
That's
how
I
see
this
stuff
so
I
mean
Thomas
mentioned.
You
know
we
could
talk
about
our
work
in
progress.
A
You
know
the
the
platforms,
work
or
operators
work,
but
I
was
also
thinking
like
it
might
be
a
good
place.
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
maintainers
project
maintainers
here,
just
to
learn
the
latest
like
a
five
to
seven
minute.
What's
the
latest
that
you've
been,
you
know,
added
to
Argo
or
the
latest.
A
You
know
project
that
you've
created
to
do
a
portal
or
do
an
API
I
mean
we're
all
pretty
Advanced
so
like
we
don't
need
like
a
half
hour,
introduction
to
containers
and
kubernetes
but
like
if
we
could
just
get
that
like
five
to
ten
minute,
like
here's,
the
the
latest
and
greatest
that
I
want
you
all
to
know
about.
You
know
that
would
be
pretty
cool,
so
that
was
one
of
you
know.
I
wanted
to
put
that
out
there.
A
If
maybe
we
mix
it
up
a
little
bit
of
review
of
the
of
the
tags
work
and
a
little
bit
of
like.
Let's
get
you
know,
a
series
of
five
or
five
maintainers
or
leaders
to
to
you
know,
spend
five
or
seven
minutes
to
talk
about
something
you
know
really
concrete.
B
Well,
just
thought
after
you
said
that
that
meeting
up
since
we
have
this
opportunity,
that's
really
great.
We've
been
wanting
to
have
like
a
road
map
for
the
tag
for
a
while.
We
could
like
brainstorm
that
as
well
and
like
as
an
objective
to
come
up
with
some
at
least
like
Heathers
of
maybe
elaborating,
even
if
we
have
time
like
some
something
and
yeah
use
use
their
time
to.
A
Yeah,
actually
on
that,
like
maybe
we
talk
about
I've,
been
wanting
to
kind
of
do
this,
like
review
together
the
objectives
of
the
tag
like
I
think
our
objectives
are
serve.
Our
users
serve
our
projects,
Advance
conventions
and
standards,
but
like
maybe
maybe
we
could
do
that,
make
sure
we're
all
aligned
on
our
objectives.
C
C
Oh
when
it
was
the
last
time
we
looked
at
the
chart,
I'm
always
surprised,
but
all
the
things
that
were
in
the
chart
over
there
haven't
been
looking
at
it
for
like
a
year
or
so,
but
that
was
like
I
think,
maybe
combining
that
this,
like
what
the
what
you
said,
Josh,
but
also
you
Jennifer,
like
like
work
on
a
road
map,
go
with
your
objective,
see
where
we're
contributing
and
what
we're
going
to
contribute.
There
I
think
it's
also
going
to
help
us.
C
So
that's
what
I
might
want
to
to
try,
because
people
type
in
the
type
into
the
search
stuff
that
they
were
interested
about.
Data
typing
githubs
that
happen
I,
don't
know
like
operators,
whatever
we're
going
to
look
in
or
platform
engineering,
and
then
we
would
have
dedicated
points
in
data
that
it
might
be
something
that
I
do
think.
C
If
this
kind
of
comes
up
or
other
topics
we
have
and
then
once
dedicated
for
as
we're
there
like
really
working
on
roadmap
and
other
topics,
but
I
would
assume
that
this
is
rather
a
smaller
round
and
honestly
I
would
like
to
back
to
Alexander's
point
or
like
actively
invite
projects
to
talk
to
us
other
people
who
might
want
to
submit
sandbox
which
are
not
yet
yet
there
I
think
it
really
boils
down
to.
Can
we
break
it
down
into
smaller
sessions,
I
mean
technically.
We
can,
because
the
platform
can
do
it.
B
So
so
I
don't
know
like
exactly
how
this
works,
but
that
on
the
17th
there's
a
project
meeting
and
we
have
four
hours
and
during
the
conference
the
rest
of
the
conference,
we
have
a
booze
and
then
it's
like
we
we
get
together
there
whenever
we
want.
Is
that
how
it
works?
B
B
G
But
I
still
think
I
still
think
that's
a
good
idea,
because
the
people
who
will
potentially
be
you
know
part
of
discussions
on
certain
topics,
might
still
have
like
the
zero
day
tickets
and
might
want
to
go
to
different
Syria
events
and
see
different
talks.
So
just
having
that
invisible
like
it
I
just
see
like
if
I
wasn't
in
this
tag
and
doing
stuff
I
would
I
would
like
to
have
had
that
on
the
schedule.
So
I
could
more
easily
plan
stuff.
G
To
come,
yeah
more
or
less
just
so
just
so
we
you
know
when
you
we
look
at
the
entire
day.
You
can
kind
of
like
pick
and
choose,
and
one
of
the
things
you
could
choose
is
part
four
of
Tag
app
delivery
is.
G
And
I'm
not
officially,
but
at
the
same
time
yes,
so
the
the
getups
com
got
shifted
to
the
open
source
Summit,
but
there.
The
last
thing
I
heard,
is
that
we
have
some
sort
of
opportunity
to
do
something.
A
G
H
G
A
That's
interesting
actually
too,
like
we
could
like
get
Ops
if
you
wanted
to
split
off
like
if
we
wanted
to
discuss
app
delivery
generally,
like
CDF,
is
another
one
that
comes
to
mind
for
me,
like
it's
another
group
working
on
app
delivery,
but
not
quite
us.
Maybe
we
gather
together
and
then
you
know,
there's
a
track
for
get
Ops
and
a
track
for
platforms
and
a
track
for
I.
Don't
know
other
projects
over
the
next
couple
hours.
G
Right
and,
and
if
we
I
can
we
can
talk
about
that
in
the
the
open
get
UPS
meeting,
we
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
there's
anything
concrete
planned
also
here,
but
if,
for
instance,
Tag
app
delivery
were
to
talk
about
something
related
to
get
Ops,
you
could
arrange.
So
we
could
kind
of
like
merge
together
at
some
points
like
we're,
we're
not
going
to
go
together
and
talk
about
this
particular
thing.
That
is,
that
is,
you
know,
hitting
both
get
UPS
specifically
about
Tag
app
delivery
in
general.
H
G
G
H
They
don't
have
anything,
they
are
still
a
working
group
under
the
ticket
delivery.
Therefore
they
should
also
have
time
as
the
platform
working
group
to
present
something
or
do
something
yeah,
but
if
they
have
their
own
space
then
it's
then
then
we
have
more
time
for
the
other
working
group
and
the
other
topics.
Yeah.
G
And
I
think,
like
from
from
from
my
point
of
view,
things
that
I
could
contribute
to.
We
talked
a
little
bit
on
slack
about
those
kind
of
things,
but.
G
But
I
could
also
do
stuff
with
it
from
like
the
open,
get
UPS
perspective
and
bring
Christian
or
some
whoever
is
going
to
be
there
I
think
most
of
them
is
going
to
be
there.
So
we
can
have
several
maintainers
perfect.
H
Previously
she
had
the
document
for
the
for
the
whole
organization,
the
staff
of
the
of
of
our
Cube
connected
activities
in
the
in
the
zoom
chat
here.
So
we
also
proposed
some
kind
of
a
of
a
schedule
for
the
project
meeting,
but
this
is
not
set
in
stone
at
the
moment.
So
if
someone
has
better
ideas
or
better
topics
to
talk
about,
feel
free
to
comment-
and
yes,
it
add
things
to.
However,
you
want.
C
C
C
C
So
we
could
adjust
the
schedule
that
if
there
is
some
slot,
where
you
might
be
available,
at
least
for
a
student,
get
you
into
that
meeting.
If
you
want
to
discuss
Europe
map,
because
you
should
definitely
be
there,
yeah.
A
Should
we
talk
about
the
booth
a
little
bit,
one
of
I
mean
the
booth
is
again
like.
What's
our
objective
there
I
guess
it's
to
support
users,
support
projects,
support
standards,
I,
guess,
there's,
there's
the
the
long
tail
of
projects
products
they
don't
have
their
own
booth
like
I,
don't
know
if
there's
folks
here
that
might
even
be
in
this
situation.
You
know
this
is
a
place
where
you
could
we
could
list
those,
especially
if
you
have
people
around
I
guess
we
could
also
talk
about
cross
project
stuff.
A
Obviously
this
Falls
in
my
bucket
platforms
and
things
where
we're
you
know
trying
to
rationalize
how
how
projects
fit
together.
A
A
I
did
have
an
idea,
you
know
if
we
have
some
slideshows,
especially
from
projects
that
aren't
having
their
own
booths
that
want
to
you
know
a
slide
or
two.
We
could
run
that
the
whole
time.
H
Goes
up
all
such
things
as
step
definition
things.
So
when
about
the
topics
we
as
a
tech
are
doing
so.
C
The
challenge
for
people
that
you
don't
know
when
people
actually
show
up
I
think
they're,
really
relevant
timings
the
really
relevant
times
I.
Usually
when
you
have
like
the
evening
events
during
the
day,
people
might
step
stop
by
or
might
not
stop
by.
That's
why
inviting
projects
to
present?
We
should
do
it,
maybe
in
the
way
you
did
it.
The
last
time
actually
Josh
like
invited.
C
F
C
Think
that
would
be
I
think
the
best,
because
all
people
are
then
because
then
people
would
show
up
because
they
want
to
avoid
that
people
go
there
or
present
their
project
and
there's
nobody.
There
they're
not
talking
to
you
to
anybody,
but
if
you
have
a
couple
of
projects
getting
together,
we
could
actually
do
it
during
the
one
of
the
evening.
Events
where
there's
usually
like
food
and
drinks
anyways
in
the
exhibition
area.
We
invite
some
projects
where
they
can
briefly
speak
about.
It.
C
I
think
you,
you
did
a
really
great
job,
the
last
time,
so
maybe
having
this
format
and
then
during
the
day,
it
would
just
maybe
be
somebody
being
there
and
telling
about
their
delivery
does
if
they
have
a
Sandbox
project
if
they
wanted
to
have
some
input
or
discuss
some
of
the
ongoing
work
we
have
I
would
not
have
a
slideshow
of
projects
when
the
maintainers
are
not
there
or
nobody
from
the
project.
But
what
would
we
say
yeah
what
we've
been
talking
about
like
okay?
This
is
pro
super.
C
They
can
tell
you
anything
so,
even
if
you
have
to
do
at
a
full
time,
that's.
H
H
At
the
moment
we
have
one
even
Niche
slot,
so
it
seems
like
on
Wednesday.
We
have
to
float
between
10,
30
and
4pm.
H
So
we
don't
have
any
evening
slot
because
they
were
already
booked
out.
A
H
F
C
Yeah,
but
maybe
it
really
try
to
get
like
an
event
like
this
together,
I
think
we
don't
have
to
force
ourselves,
not
using
it.
The
entire
time
we
can
I
think
lunch
breaks
would
work
as
well,
because
people
could
grab
lunch
and
we
can
have
a
discussion
there,
like
maybe
if
two
or
three
slots
that
we
that
that
we're
using
where
people
are
most
likely
going
to
be
available
because
their
obviously
not
going
to
be
available
during
sessions.
C
Some
might
be,
but
it's
very
unlikely
to
be
here
in
the
breaks
they're
there
might
people
not
doing
sessions
and
having
maybe
like
two
or
three
like
these
meetups
topic,
related
I,
think
that's
totally
fine
and
then
maybe
one
on
talk
to
Tech
app
delivery
about
your
sandbox
project
and
because
then
we
would
have
one
talking
about
our
activities,
one
where
people
can
present
their
projects
and
one
stuff
which
is
app.
Delivery
related
I.
Think
that's
already
a
lot
for
us
to
cover
to
be
fair.
C
A
C
Yeah
I
think
we
shouldn't,
because
it's
very
unrealistic
that
we
won't
spend
the
entire
time
there.
And
it's
also
not
very
frankly,
not
really
worth
our
time,
because
if
nobody
is
showing
up
quite
spend
time.
A
A
H
Yeah,
so
we
could,
what
we
could
do
was
would
be
at
the
Boost
that
we
do
some
kind
of
office
hours
for
one
hour
or
whatever,
and
the
second
part
that
we
let
them
make
some
some
use
case,
presentations,
project
presentations
and
so
on.
G
Mean
yeah
I,
just
like
we,
we
could
you
know
as
long
as
we
have
something
very
specific
happening
at
specific
times.
It
is
possible
for
people
to
kind
of
just
drop
by
and
hang
out
there.
So
if
people
from
Target
delivery,
you
know
go
past
the
booth
and
kind
of
just
hang
around
there
for
a
while.
If,
if
there's
stuff,
that's
you
know,
you
have
some
free
time
or
just
want
to
relax.
H
G
Know
so
it's
kind
of
to
just
represent
Tag
app
delivery,
I
think
that
would
be
cool
but
but
I
like
the
idea
of
having
specific
talks
happening
at
specific
times,
just
because
it
makes
it
so
there's
so
much
stuff
going
on.
B
I
guess
that's
it's
for
today,
then
we've
got
another
five
minutes
at
your
time
back.
Thank
you
so
much
anything
else
to
us
or
Josh
sure.