►
From YouTube: CNCF Cooperative Delivery WG 2021-11-10
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Already
three
minutes
passed
I'll
see
if
well
find
the
right
window.
A
Yeah,
if
josh
is
on.
A
All
right
so
josh
is
not
on.
I
know
scott.
A
From
the
githubs
working
group
wanted
to
join
these
meetings,
but
I
think
we
had
a
little
bit
of
issue
with
nod.
You
know
announcing
times
in
a
good
way
or
or
something
it
was.
It
was
a
bit
confusing
to
figure
out
whether
this
meeting
is
happening
today
or
not.
It's
not
in
the
calendar.
A
Right
so
november,
24th
is
in
there
yeah
it's
supposed
to
be
bi-weekly,
and
I
guess
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know
if,
if
it's
not
in
the
calendar
after
buying
I'll
they're
good,
all
right
so.
A
All
right,
we
don't
have
to
do
a
a
long
meeting,
as
you
know,
seems
like
stuff
aren't
totally
I'll
see
if
scott
joins
that
would
be
fun
move
on,
but
obviously
you
know
yeah
short
notice.
A
And
it
doesn't
seem
like
josh
doing
this
on.
Maybe
he
wasn't
even
aware
we
I
I
talked
to
you
so
the
the
thing
is
that
we
me
and
mainly
thomas
kind
of
decided
on
bi-weekly,
and
I
think
he
up
to
the
calendar-
and
we
might
have
you
know
not
after
that
correctly
and
you
know
people
have
been
busy
and
everything
like
that,
so
we're
just
kind
of
off
to
a
slow
start.
A
I
guess-
and
you
know,
speaking
of
slow
starts,
that's
kind
of
why
I
had
on
the
gender
call
to
arms
yet
again,
because
we
have
this
working
group
charter
with
which
has
a
bunch
of
interested
parties,
but
besides
the
first
initial
draft,
where
people
you
know
kind
of,
were
excited
for
this,
it's
besides
that
one
meeting
none
of
them
has
been
in
any
of
these
meetings
and
haven't
you
know
again
if
we're,
if
we're
bad
at
communicating
stuff,
then
obviously
it's
hard
for
people
yeah,
I
I
missed
when
the
charter
was
was
put
in
a
put
together.
A
A
Let's
wait
for
him
to
actually
join
thanks.
God,
hey,
hey,
hey!
What's
up
fancy
seeing
you
here
so
I
was
just.
I
was
just
saying
that
we
we
have
kind
of
done
a
bad
job
at
we
gathered
a
lot
of
interested
parties
for
this
working
group
and
then
we've
been
back
and
forth
and
probably
not
communicated
very
well
when
things
are
when
things
are
happening
and
stuff
like
that.
A
So
we
have
had
a
couple
of
meetings
and
not
many,
but
we
have
two
officially
and
both
times
it's
been
me
and
josh
and
and
thomas
or
yeah
we
had
well
scott
was
in
the
second
meeting
and
not
thomas
so
yeah.
We
had
like
a
change
of
cast
for
these
two
meetings,
so
we
haven't
really
done
anything
in
particular.
We're
gonna
just
talk
about
cool
things
to
do
which
I'll
continue
to
do
so.
A
So
it's
it's
kind
of
sad
that
we're
only
like
three
niche
meetings
and
so
what
did
yeah
it's.
B
B
Yeah,
so
I
had
an
idea,
not
a
brilliant
idea,
but
just
a
thought.
I
guess
I
should
say
to
you,
robert
about
what
you
just
asked:
it's
something
that
we've
been
planning
on
implementing
with
the
get
ups
working
group,
but
have
not
yet
done.
B
And
jump
start
that
here
since
there's
not
a
lot
of
then
move
to
to
community.cncf.io
so
that
the
meetings
can
be
announced
there
and
that
way
they
might
be.
It
might
be
a
little
easier
for
folks
to
find
and
they
could
be
tweeted
out.
What
do
you
think
about
trying
out
bevy
that
way.
A
That
makes
that
make
perfect
sense
because
we
haven't
really
done
anything
yet
so
you
know
we
haven't,
we
don't
have
a
cadence
of
you
know
how
we're
doing
these
things
and
I
I
know
I
get
spammed
with
stuff
from
that
particular
page.
So
you
know
it
works.
I
guess
how
do
you
do
that?
So
I
know
there's
they
have
this
chapter
thing
or
you
know,
and
virtual
technical
advisory
groups.
I
guess
that's.
A
B
Yeah,
that's
really
all
yeah.
I
have
not
actually
set
it
up
yet
I
did.
I
was
doing
a
little
bit
of
a
little
test
for
that
for
the
new
york,
the
nyc
kubernetes
meetup,
and
then
we
we
put
it
on
hold
because
there
were
some
things
around
covid
and.
B
A
I'll
put
that
on
the
thing
to
do
for
helm,
for
fluff.
B
Yeah,
okay,
cool
and
I'd
be
willing
to
I'd,
be
happy
to
not
today
and
I'd
be
happy
to
try,
because
I'm
trying
to
get
out
a
deliverable,
that's
important
for
today,
but
but
I'd
be
happy
to
to
to
test
that
out
with
youtube
or
whoever
else
wants
to
do.
It.
A
Yeah,
if
we
can,
if
you
find
out
how
to
actually
just
add
meetings,
hopefully.
B
Tell
me
to
ask:
well
actually
I'm
not
a
maintainer
on
this,
so
they
probably
won't.
Add
me,
but
here's
the
thing
if
you
you,
you
are
correct.
Robert.
A
I'm
a
co-chair
on
this,
but
but
I
don't
you
know,
I
don't
that's
why
I
I
don't
know
preface
this,
but
that
means
because
that
doesn't
make
sense
well
how.
B
About
this
I'll
see
I'll
dm
you
with
someone
from
cncf
and
because
I've
already
had
conversations
like
most
of
the
way
finished
with
setting
this
up,
we
just
put
them
on
hold
because.
B
A
cadence
for
other
projects,
groups,
and
so
on
and
I'll
just
say
that
you
know
you
know
give
please
you
know,
give
robert
the
keys
to
this.
A
It
would
it
would
be
really.
No
not.
You
know
it
would
be
no
fun
if
I
would
have
to
go
through
people
to
get
this
out.
So
if
I
can
just
get
a
button
to
say
next
meeting
will
be
that
that
will
be
the
best.
I
think
yeah.
B
Do
you
have
a
sorry
for
the
working
group?
Do
you
have
a
my
brand's,
a
little
mushy
right
now
service
desk
group
for
the
cooperative
delivery
working
group,
yet.
A
I
don't
think
so.
If
that's
the
case,
then
that's
something
thomas
probably
would
have
fixed
I'm
I'm
guessing,
since
it
is
from
the
from
the
tag
itself.
A
Perfect,
thank
you,
scott
sure.
Oh
cool
put
you
on
the
action
for
the
community.
I
think
just
because.
A
A
A
Yeah,
all
right
so
we'll
we'll
do
that
to
kind
of
get
the
word
out
to
get
more
people
involved
and
you
know
actually
have
good
communication.
That's
you
know
kind
of
key
for
these
things.
A
I
guess
the
other
thing
that
I
had
on
the
agenda
was
just
talk
about
well,
possibly
talk
about,
since
I
I
thought
it
was
just
me
and
josh,
but
apparently
joshua
here
so,
but
the
kubecon
china
tag
app
delivery
presentation
where
we
me
and
josh
sent
the
video
which
was
really
hard
to
do,
because
I
I
don't
like
doing
videos,
especially
not
if
you
write
what
you're
supposed
to
be
saying,
because
I
like
to
just
talk
and
see
what
happens
that
works
for
me.
A
B
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
did
watch
that
I
did
watch
it
because
we
also
added
or
sorry
because
there
was
also
a
video
added
for
the
get
ops
working
group
two
and
they
were
all
combined
in
the
same
tag.
So
it
looked
good.
It
looked
good
from
what
I
could
see
so.
A
B
All
giving
it
just
it
just
shows
that
there's
an
actual
coordination
which
which
I
think
is
part
of
the
vision
of
cnc
in
the
first
place,
and
it's
just
it's
it's
maybe
I
should
just
say
it's
encouraging
to
see,
and
I
hope
it
will
be
encouraging
to
end
users,
because
I
think
they
have
good
reason
to
feel
encouraged
by
it.
I
think
because
we
do
have
current
and
future
collaborations
planned
and
integrations
planned
yeah.
A
It's
good
that
we're.
You
know,
you
know
not
only
just
having
working
groups
that
are
doing
all
these
separate
things,
but
also
you
know,
talk
talking
between
each
other
and
do
stuff
together
and
obviously
most
of
us
are
in
different
work
groups.
Just
some
happen
to
leave
some
and
some
don't
so
in
some
groups
one
are
more
involved
than
others,
but
we're
we're
all
on
the
same
team.
A
I
guess
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
say
so
yeah,
so
that
happened
obviously
there's
cfp
stuff
for
kubecon
europe
2022,
which
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
a
talk,
because
I
want
to
get
free
tickets
in,
but
I
thought
I
might
show
up
there
anyway,
just
because
that
would
be
cool
to
actually
be
able
to
do
that
after
call
it
and
everything
like
that,
but
and
we'll
see
what
happens
then
about
that.
So
that's
cucumber
china.
I
guess
that's
the
closest
to
china.
A
We're
gonna,
get
this
video,
so
works
pretty
well
and
then
the
only
thing
that
we
actually
have
planned
to
do
so
far
actually
well
have
concrete
plants
do
and
that's
the
that's
the
survey.
So
the
the
idea
is
to
ask
people
questions
related
to
how
they,
how
are
they,
you
know,
delivered
in
the
entire
stack,
so
to
speak?
How
are
they
do?
Are
they
doing
app
delivery
in
a
certain
way
and
infrastructure
things
in
a
different
workflow?
Are
they
doing
together?
A
You
know
how
what
tools
are
using
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
just
to
get
information
to
to
have
something
to
to
to
work
against
and
see
what
people
are
doing
now
and
see
if
we
can
see
if
anyone
has
any
like
there's
something
missing
like
out
there,
it's
something
that
people
might
not
understand
or
have
troubles
with,
so
I'm
I'm.
A
I
was
supposed
to
talk
to
cncf
about
distributing
a
survey
and
now
that
you're
here
since
you've
been
doing
more
of
these
things-
maybe
you
know
but
does
cncf,
have
a
survey
like
tool
that
one
can
utilize,
instead
of
just
sending
out
forms
or.
B
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
About
that,
I
it's
probably
my
internet.
What
I
was
saying
is
that
there's
a
link
to
resources
that
are
given
for
cncf
projects
that
I'm
going
to
find
right
now
and
send
to
you
and
that
there's
not
as
far
as
I
know,
a
similar
page
for
for
the
technical
advisory
groups
and
the
working
groups
under
those,
but
but
but
most
of
those
same
most
of
those
same
services
are
available
for
the
working
groups
as
well,
and
the
tags
so
I'll
send
that
along.
B
A
Right
yeah,
so
so
it
might
be
when,
when
I
have
to
when
I
can
send
stuff
in
for
tickets,
I
might
just
ask
if
they
have
a
server
tool,
because
I
don't
think
it's,
I
don't
think
it's
a
you
know.
A
It
doesn't
really
matter
that
much
as
long
as
we
just
have
a
you
know,
a
google
form
or
whatever,
and
the
most
important
thing
is
to
have
cncf
social
media
accounts.
You
know,
spamming
it
out
or
or
things
like
any
waveform
that
that
can
get
distributed
out
is
good.
A
You
know
in
in
what
way
the
the
the
survey
is
represented.
I
don't
really
think
cared.
I
don't
really
care.
As
long
as
you
know,
the
questions
get
out
there.
B
I
see
there
is
actually
a
so
the
link
that
I
just
said
there.
There
is
a
now.
This
is
for
projects,
so
this
is
pretty
much
what
I
was
saying.
What
I
was
saying
you
could
find
out,
but
it
says
it
pretty
straightforwardly
for
projects
that
the
cncf
marketing
team
can
help
create
surveys
for
your
project
to
help
ascertain
adoption
or
other
interests.
A
prominent
example
is
our
annual
cncf
survey
is
for
smaller,
more
targeted
surveys.
We
can
assist,
submit
a
request
via
the
cncf
service
desk.
A
A
So
you
we
would,
you
know,
have
infrastructure
and
application
delivery
work
together,
cooperatively
going
forward
so,
which
is
why
I
kind
of
wanted
to
have
a
a
recurring
survey
and
not
just
like
a
one-time
thing
and
then,
after
a
while
after
a
couple
years,
we'll
have
some
sort
of
like
you
know.
You
know
our
yearly
update
to
see
where
we
at-
and
you
know
what
you
know,
trends
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think
that
that
could
be
a
a
good,
a
good
tool
going
forward.
A
So
so,
if
cncf
have
any
way
to
officially
host
that
like
they
already
do
with
a
lot
of
the
recurring
service,
then
you
know.
That
would
be
great.
I
think.
A
Yeah
all
right
so
so
far
the
action
items
we
have
is
just
I
I
couldn't
get
access
to
tag
app
delivery
repository
because
right
now
I
don't
and
I
don't
think
josh
has
either
so
one
thing
is
having
setting
setting
up
the
code,
owners
and
stuff
like
that,
but
you're
you're,
not
even
in
the
organization.
So
I
guess
or
maybe
you
don't
need
to
have
that
for
extra-
I
don't
I
don't
know
whatever
cncf
or
the
tag
app
delivery.
People
want
to
do
I'll.
Just
ask
and
see.
A
A
I
guess,
let's
see,
wait
to
look
at
it
and,
besides
that,
we
are
been
talking
back
and
forth
about
doing
patterns
and,
and
things
like
that,
but
I
don't
think
we
kind
of
landed
on
one
thing
that
we
want
to
do
with
that.
If
we
want
to
have
a
place
where
we
store
documents
or
if
you
want
to
create
something
to
kind
of
explore
patterns,
or
you
know
how
we're
going
to
do
that,
we,
I
know
that
josh
do
a
lot
of
work
with
the
potato
head.
A
A
Got
it,
and
obviously
you
know
again,
we
can
cooperate
with
through
you
know
across
the
the
working
groups
there
with
the
github's
working
group,
for
instance,
because
there's
a
lot
get
ops
related
when
you
also
include
infrastructure,
which
is
something
people
are
always
asking
about,
so
you
know
being
having
having
clarified
some
things
there
or
help.
B
Okay,
oh
and
robert
quick
question
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
updated
is.
B
A
A
A
It's
it's
me
and
it's
josh,
josh
gavins.
B
One
quick
question
is
so
so
I
noticed
that
under
the
cooperative,
let's
see
under
in
in
the
tag
after
delivery
repo
in
the
code
owner's
file
under
the
cooperative
delivery
working
group
directory,
there's
alex
jones
and
yeah
th
th
shoe.
A
Yeah,
that's
thomas,
oh
right,
yeah,
so
alex
and
thomas
kind
of
started
rolling,
but
again
they
have
a
a
a
higher
role.
Whatever
you
want
to
call
it
in
the
tag
app
delivery,
so
they
can't
be
a
chairs
for
the
working
group,
but
I
I
suspect
both
of
them
are
going
to
be
really
really
really
involved
in
this.
We
just
need
to
get
stuff
rolling
a
little
bit
because
everyone's
busy.
B
So,
interestingly,
just
so
you
know
I
we
for
the
this.
Would
this
would
relate
to
tag
up
delivery
directory
like
you
were,
except
you
were
talking
about.
Inside
of
the
sorry
sorry,
the
cooperative
delivery
working
group
directory
underneath
the
tag
cncf
slash
tag
after
delivery,
repo
that
conor
nurse
file
should
should
give
permissions
for
these
users
to
to
own
anything
within
that
and
to
be
able
to
submit
reviews
and
to.
B
You
know
tip
to
emerge
code
to
merge,
vr's
working
group,
and
I
do
not
have
permission
to
do
that,
so
I
suspect
that
I
need
to
be
added
as
a
if
I
remember
right.
I
could
be
wrong
about
this,
but
I
suspect
I
need
to
be
added
as
a
a
collaborator
to
this
repo
or
to
a
team
within
within
the
I
guess,
within
the
org.
In
this
case
it's
cncf
that.
A
Yeah
that
that
is
that
is
correct.
I
I
just
literally
today
sat
with
a
cold
owner's
file
trying
to
to
figure
some
stuff
out
and
yeah.
If,
if,
if
you
aren't
added
to
the
repository
with
the
right
access,
you
don't
get
those
pull
requests
yeah.
A
So
so
you
need
to
be
added
to
at
least
the
you
probably
could
do
out,
and
you
know
outside
collaborators.
So
you
don't
need
to
be
in
the
cncf
organization,
but
at
least
on
the
tag,
app
delivery
repository.
You
could
be
needed
to
be
there
with
right
access,
because
you
can't
write
to
the
to
the
master
branch
which
gotcha
in.
B
That
case,
we
should
probably
exclude.
A
A
B
This
is
what
we
did
for,
for
example.
This
is
what
we
did
for
for
the
prometheus
community.
B
Since
I
said
that,
but
it
does.
A
So
again,
you're
you
kind
of
fell
out
a
bit
there,
which
is
why
we're
standing
silently
staring
out
in
in
there
waiting
for
you
to
finish.
But
so
I
heard
yeah
that's
what
you
did
for
prometheus
community.
I
guess
that's
yeah!
That's
what
you
link
to
the
home
charts.
A
Yeah
so
that
yeah,
that
makes
sense,
I
think
I
think
that's
just
something
we
need
to
be
adding.
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
we
can
do,
but
obviously
again,
both
alex
thomas
or
luis
or
whoever,
who
actually
has
access
there
could
need
to
be
adding
the
everyone
that
has
any
sort
of
chair
position
into
the
tag,
app
delivery,
repo
with
right
access
and
then
make
sure
that
the
branch
protections
are
correct.
A
A
Let's
again
I'll
I'll
I'll
talk
to
you.
A
I
think
we
could
just
talk
to
thomas
or
alex
or
any
one
of
the
people
that
actually
have
a
more
involved
role
in
the
tag
to
get
that
worked
on
so
hong
chow,
louis
jennifer,
alex
or
thomas,
and
they
probably
could
just
fix
it,
and
it's
probably
mostly
fixed.
I
just
don't
know
because
I
can't
see
anything
so
I
guess
works
at
that.
At
this
point
we
ever
get
that
we
can
obviously
then
again
in
the
corporate
delivery.
A
Work
group
just
update
stuff
a
little
bit
faster
because
me
and
josh
would
be
able
to
to
to
deal
with
the
pull
requests
and
stuff
like
that,
but
also
we
could
then
have
start
setting
up
some
sort
of
patterns
repository
or
a
shared
document
or
whatever
we
figure
out
at
that
point,
and
you
know
at
that
point.
Obviously
people
can
then
start
submitting
stuff
and
we'll
everything's
gonna
start
rolling.
At
that
point,.
A
A
B
Yes,
do
you,
can
you
pass
me
josh's,
github
user
name,
so
I
can
finish
these
issues.
Real,
quick.
A
A
A
All
right,
thank
you
cool.
I
I
think
I
think
that's
all
for
now,
and
and
hopefully
we
can
get
some
get
the
word
out
in
the
in
the
different
channels
and
and
get
more
people
involved,
but
again
since
we're
so
early
on.
A
Nothing
is
really
worked
on
at
the
moment
in
particular.
So
it's
fine,
that's
there's
not
a
lot
of
people,
but
obviously
more
people
would
need
more
ideas
for
things
to
do
going
forward.
So
that
alone
is
is
a
great
thing
but
yeah,
so
where
the
survey
and
all
this
administrative
figure
out
all
the
technical
stuff.
So
that's
that's.
Basically,
what's
going
on
it's
a
short
version.