►
From YouTube: CDEvents / SIG Events Vocabulary Meeting - Mar 22, 2022
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
B
B
Yeah
steve
is
still
here.
He
is
already
in
the
summertime
right.
A
C
Okay,
hopefully
you
can.
You
can
see
okay,
great
so
like
welcome
everyone.
So
this
is
I
at
the
cd
event.
So
this
is
a
cd
event
vocabulary.
Discussion
meeting
today.
C
As
you
mentioned
the
middle
during
our
last
meeting,
these
documents
have
been
relocated
under
the
akandee
cdf
organization,
but
the
link
should
be
the
same.
So
hopefully
everyone
has
access.
C
C
We
might
talk
about
the
contributor
summit
if
you
want,
and
then
I
want
to
discuss,
maybe
about
the
idea.
Potential
idea
for
workshop
updates
on
the
proof
of
concept
that
we're
doing
any.
E
C
Right
for
citycon
yeah
yeah:
that's
we
can
edit
on
the.
C
I
mean
we
can
start
with
that.
If
you
want,
I
don't
mind,
we
do
have
a
submission
that
we
have
done
with
eric
and
myself
for
cd
on
and
we're
still
waiting
on
an
answer
on
that.
But
of
course
I
mean
it
would
be
great
to
have
more
submissions
around
city
events
or
to
seek
events.
So
if
you
have
an
idea
matias
a
topic
that
you
would
like
to
submit
for
cdcon
future
track,
I
think
that
will
be
great.
B
But
you
have
submitted
to
the
in
person
conference
right.
C
C
B
So
I'm
not
intending
to
do
speaking
in
person.
I
was
just
yeah
curious
because
I
I
knew
it
was
a
requirement
to
to
be
in
person.
C
Yeah,
actually,
the
email
is
from
the
linux
foundation.
This
is
an
important
cdcon
update.
C
It's
basically,
maybe
they
sent
only
two
people
who
submitted
to
the
conference,
but
basically
it
says
because
of
the
there
is
this.
C
Discriminatory
legitim
legislative
effort
currently
underway
in
the
state
of
texas.
We
have
decided
that
speakers
acidicon
2022,
can
participate
virtually,
should
they
not
feel
comfortable
joining
in
person
yeah.
It
says
as
well
that
no
action
is
needed
for
you
at
this
time.
If
your
talk
is
accepted,
you
will
be
sent
an
email
asking
you
to
confirm
your
participation
patient,
either
in
person
or
virtually
along
with
other
important
speaker
logistics.
C
So,
in
a
few
days
they
will
let
us
know
if
the
talk
is
accepted
or
not,
and
then
I
guess
we'll
we'll
have
to
decide
whether
to
do
it
in
person
or
not.
I
would
still
be
planning
on
traveling,
probably,
but
I
don't
know
we
need
to
discuss
with
eric
in
case
the
engage.
Our
talk
is
accepted.
What
do
we
want
to
do.
C
C
Right
yeah,
so
if
you
want
to
do
an
extra
submit
another
submission
or
if
you
have
ideas
for
submissions
for
the
visual
track
by
any
means,
I
think
it
would
be
great
the
more
presence
we
have
at
the
at
the
event,
the
better.
C
A
What
about
the
option
to
have
a
panel
discussion
or
the
best
or
feather
session?
How
is
that
going
wrong?
Does
anyone
know.
A
E
A
E
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
don't
think
they
had.
I
don't
think
they
expected
more
than
like
five
or
six
hundred
people
to
start
with
at
the
in-person
one
and
generally
they
do.
I
don't
remember
what
we
did
last
year,
but
I
think
I
want
to
say
five
thousand,
so
it's
just
it's
almost
just
ten
percent
of
an
in
person
in
terms
of
the
number
of
people
who
actually
show
up
to
the
virtual,
I'm
glad
they're
doing
it.
E
E
We
just
got
to
be
uncomfortable
for
people
like
chris
anderson
who
lives
in
austin
and
he's
got
all
these
conferences
in
austin,
because
the
open
source,
the
open
source
summit,
is
in
austin
as
well,
and
the
it's
like
that
is
open.
Source
summit
is
june
21st
through
the
24th
and
cd
econ
is
june,
7th
through
the
8th.
E
A
lot
of
time
in
austin,
so
hey
well
we're
on
this
topic,
so
I
finally
have
the
organizational
credentials
for
the
cdf
online
meetup.
Do
we
want
to
do
a
cdf
online
meetup
talk.
E
We
talked
about
this
and
then
I
think
there
was
some
discussion
about
a
webinar,
so
there
was
confusion
as
what.
If
there
was
a
separate
two
two
things
and
yes,
there
would
be.
The
cdf
online
meetup
has
about
500
members
and
we
usually
get
around
40
people.
At
least
we
were
before
we
stopped
it
about
40
people
per
session
would
join
and
a
lot
more
post
views.
E
That's
up
to
you
completely
up
to
you
guys.
We
can
schedule
it
for
may
giving
us
plenty
of
time
to
get
the
information
out
and
I
apologize.
I
have
been
a
bit
tardy
from
our
event
absent
from
this
group,
because
our
we
had
it.
I
had
a
conflict,
but
now
that
the
time
change,
I
don't
have
a
conflict
anymore.
E
Hoping
it
we're
not
they've
we're
not
going
to
have
to
put
ourselves
through
this
again,
which
would
be
brilliant,
but
anyway
we
can
do
that.
We
can
do
it
anytime.
You
want
to
do
it
since
I
I'm
the
organizer.
Now
we
can
put
it
on
the
schedule
for
any
time
and
do
we
have
our
proper
announcement
out
about
us
becoming
an
actual
project?
C
Not
yet
no,
no,
I
mean
we've
been
working
on
the
getting
some.
What
was
the
quotes
for
the
pr
document
exactly
but
yeah,
so
we're
still
missing
some
and
yeah.
I
don't
know
when
we
want
to
do
it.
If
you
want
to
put
like
a
deadline
before
some
of
the
conferences
coming
up
or
after
I
think
it
might
be
nice
to
have
it
maybe
before
cd
pawn
at
least.
E
So
there's
you
know,
I'm
working
with
the
devops
institute
for
putting
together
a
community
a
real,
actually
a
real
community
that
people
can
go
and
post
questions,
and
I
listed
out
five
or
about
15
different
topics
for
community
discussion
boards
and
the
third
most
popular
one
was
cd
events
and
that
that
went
out
to
all
of
the
cd
the
devops
institute
ambassadors.
I
was
actually
shocked
by
that
git
lab
is
got
two
people
who
want
to
co
co-co-monitor
that
cd
events
discussion
board.
E
The
reason
why
I
bring
it
up
is
because
of
the
interest
I
was
surprised.
I
threw
it
out
there
and
wondering
if
people
would
respond
back
and
it
beat
get
ops,
it
beat.
It
beat
a
lot
of
things.
It
came
third
under
kubernetes
and
aws
or
cd
events
yeah.
So
I
believe
that
there's
interest
in
there
there.
On
that
note,
there
are
it's,
there's
still
opportunities
to
speak
at
the
this
april,
cicd
skill
up
day.
E
You
still
can
submit
talks
for
that.
If
anybody's
interested
in
submitting
a
talk
for
for
cd
events,
let
me
get
you
that.
Let
me
pull
that
up,
so
I
think
that
there,
the
word's
starting
to
get
out,
I
think,
there's
it's.
I
was
really
surprised
that
that
came
up
as
the
one
of
the
top
ones
that
people
wanted
to
have
a
learning
discussion
board
around.
E
Yet
available
as
soon
as
it's
available
as
soon
as
that
that
is
published,
they
haven't,
announced
it.
Yet,
since
I'm
working
with
them,
I'm
and
I
was
the
one
who
gave
them
some
of
the
topics.
E
I
know
that
that
topic
was
selected
as
one
of
the
early
events
or
the
early
discussion
boards,
and
I
even
went
back
and
I
went
back
to-
I
went
back
to
the
ambassadors
and
said:
are
we
sure
that
you
guys
don't
think
this
is
cd
events,
meaning
things
to
do
and
not
and
not
a
natural
platform
for
orchestrating
activities,
and
they
were
like?
No?
No,
no,
we
understand
what
it
is
and
we
want
that
that
they
they
chose.
They
still
chose
it.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
was
clear.
E
So
I
just
put
in
the
chat
the
the
page
where
you
can
find
the
speaker
information,
and
I
would
highly
recommend
that
we
have
somebody
talk
about
cd
events
at
that
conference
and
then
the
other
thing
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
might
want
to
do
is,
if
you
guys
haven't
heard
they
will
be
doing
awards
community
awards
at
cdcon,
and
you
can
select
your
or
nominate
your
favorite
contributor.
E
So
you
guys
should
nominate
each
other
for
under
the
cdf
contributor,
not
under
a
project
contribution,
but
as
a
cdf
contributor,
because
this
team
and
of
all
the
teams
should
be
getting
recognized
for
that
work
and
that's
just
do
it
creating
a
github
it's
already
out
there.
All
you
have
to
do
is
reply
to
the
stream
and
nominate
each
other.
E
So
on
the
online
meetup,
you
guys
just
tell
me
when,
and
I
will
get
it
scheduled,
we
can
do
a
panel
panels
are
always
great
to
do.
I
think
it's
the
easiest
thing
to
do
and
we've
done
them
before
and
you
guys
do
a
great
job
of
them.
So
I
think
we
could
put
together
a
panel
discussion
pretty
quickly
and
you
guys
give
me
a
date
and
I
will
make
it
happen.
A
E
E
And
for
a
panel,
what
we
could
do
is
I
can
moderate
it.
We
can
get
a
shared
google
doc
going
come
up
with
questions
that
you
want
me
to
round
robin
between
you
and
that
keeps
everybody
from
having
to
do
a
proper
presentation
or
try
to
do
a
demo
or
anything
like
that.
C
A
E
C
Okay,
then,
for
the
sorry
just
quickly
going
back
to
the
virtual
track
for
a
cd
con,
do
we
want
to
do
a
panel
submission
there
as
well?
Anyone?
And
if,
yes,
anyone
I
would
be
volunteering
to
do
that.
E
A
A
E
And
we
can
work
the
pad.
You
can
use
the
same
dock
for
this
for
both
panels.
For
that
matter,
okay,
there
is
the
link,
so
it's
out
there
just
has
a
title
right
now,
but
we
can
at
least
start
collaborating
around
it
from
then.
C
C
All
right
thanks
tracy,
so
for
the
google
so
for
the
devops
institute.
We
have
the
cfp
open
if
anyone's
interested
to
submit
there
and
yeah.
Personally,
I
won't
be
able
to
do
that.
I'm
away
I'm
on
pto
for
some
time
in
april,
so
I
won't
be
around.
C
Right
so
in
terms
of
cd
con
cd
events
gone
sorry,
I
don't
know
if
you've
seen
that
we
have
an
event.
Page
looks
like
this
now.
C
And
yeah
learn
more
points
to
the
website.
For
now,
and
hopefully
we
can
get
sorry,
that's
embarrassing,
yeah.
Hopefully
we
can
get
an
rsvp
at
some
point.
I
was
discussing
with
cara
so
that
we
can
get
an
idea
of
who
is
going
to
how
many
people
are
going
to
be
there,
but
yeah.
C
It
is
live,
but
last
time
I
checked
it
was
not
yet
in
the
in
the
in
the
shed
page
yeah.
So
let
me
check.
Let
me
check
with
cara
when
I
get
the
confirmation
from
her.
I
will
tell
you
we
can
push
it
then
on
the
media.
Sorry,
I'm
trying
to
look
for
something
and
talking
at
the
same
time
and
doesn't
work.
C
C
C
Still
not
there
on
the
shadow
page,
so
maybe
as
soon
as
we
we
have
it
on
the
chat
page.
Maybe
we
can.
We
can
get
the
rsvp
button
as
well
and
then
we
can
start
promoting
it.
A
A
C
A
C
All
right
so
in
terms
of
content
planning
yeah,
we
still
need
more
content
for
this,
so
we
need
keynotes
and
we
need
several
talks
and
possibly
panel
workshops
and
yeah.
I
wanted
to
to
ask
you
tracy
if
you
were
going
to
be
there,
if
you
were
interested,
maybe
setting
up
a
nice
panel
but
you're
not
unfortunate.
No.
E
C
Yeah
I
mean
I
content
steve
mentioned
that
we
might
be
able
to
get
some
talk
from
hoteliers
team,
but
I
haven't
heard.
E
You
know
we
just
had
our
out
our
community
outreach.
I
let
me
shoot
that
over.
Let
me
send
it
out
to
the
group.
C
Yeah,
if
there
is
anyone
on
from
the
aquilo
community
who
would
be
interested
in
talking
that's
great
also,
I
mean
it
would
be
great
to
to
keep
our
speakers
diverse.
So
if
you
have
any
known
male
speaker
in
mind,
that's
always
great
right.
Now
that
don't
have
any
many
diverse
options.
C
So
my
idea
for
the
for
the
content,
but
was,
is
to
basically
in
the
keynotes,
some
introduction
about
events
and
what
events
where
events
are
now
in
cicd,
we
give
some
numbers
there
making
interesting
presentation
and
about
how
events
are
used
and
the
problems
that
exist
in
the
missing
interoperability
and
then
to
have
talks
from
different
projects,
possibly
that
how
they
use
events
today,
because
we
don't.
We
cannot
really
have
talks
about
implementation
of
cd
events
much
because
they're
not
implemented
very
much
out
there
yet.
C
Today,
how
captain
are
using
events
yeah
so
for
captain?
There
is
a
captain
event
happening
in
the
in
the
afternoon,
but
in
the
morning
the
captain
folks
might
be
available.
So
I'm
also
waiting
for
a
confirmation
for
a
talk.
There
are
some
candidates
there
protecton.
I
have
a
talk
confirmed
from
vpaf
who
is
interested
in
presenting
the
work
that
we've
done
on
technocide
to
implement
cd
events
there
and
how
we
use
events
there
we
reached
out
to
the
spinnaker
community
and
ready
for
a
response
there.
C
Also
it
would
be
good
to
get
someone
from
jenkins
and
I'm
also
waiting
on
a
response
on
that
front
and
yeah.
There
was
mentioned
by
matthias
in
the
middle
that
we
might
have
a
eiffel
presentation
if
travel
becomes
possible
for
them
and
that's
in
terms
of
talks,
the
options
that
are
on
the
table
today
and
in
terms
of
demos.
C
Yes
and
other
things
that
we
could
do
in
terms
of
content.
We
could
organize
a
panel
or
a
workshop,
and
one
idea
that
I
had
for
workshop
would
be
developing.
C
C
A
C
A
A
C
C
So
is
anyone
interested
in
contributing
to
any
content
for
the
conference
from
from
this
group.
E
You
know
what
I
believe
that
brad
mccoy
out
of
australia
would
be
an
excellent
person
to
present
on
you
know
kind
of
a
demo
of
the
work
we've
done
with
artelias.
I
don't
know
if
he
can
be,
I
don't
know
if
he
can
get
funding
to
make
it
to
spain.
Can
we
do
something
like
that?
C
I
don't
know,
I
think
the
the
plan,
as
till
now
has
been
to
to
to
do
everything
in.
E
C
We're
going
to
have
like
a
room
with
60
space
for
60
attendees,
so
I
don't
know
if
they,
if
they
plan
for
remote
speakers,.
C
Why
not
yeah
yeah?
I
mean
if
that's
the
only
way
to
get
good
content.
If
the
right
people
is
not
going
to
be
there
then
yeah
sure
I
mean
that
yeah.
C
Yes,
that's
a
very
good
point.
I
will
ask
kara
what
what
the
kind
of
facility
we
would
have
there
and
yeah.
E
If
it's
a
room
for
like
60
people,
it's
probably
already
a
meeting
room,
it's
already
set
up
with
the
at
least
a
way
to
project
on
a
screen.
C
To
do
some,
I
felt
presentation
that
would
make
it
easier
for
that
as
well.
C
Okay,
so
I
will
check
in
terms
of
remote
attendees,
and
I
will.
C
F
F
C
Yeah
that'd
be
great,
I
think
at
least
from
what
I've
heard
from
from
you
on
the
volvo
use
case.
I
think
it's
a
very,
very
powerful
story
that
you.
C
So
I
think
it
would
be
great
content
for,
for
the
events,
come.
C
We
could
do
that.
Yes,
but
it
depends.
I
mean
if
you
want
to
do
a
talk
specific
on
the
on
the
volvo
use
case.
You
don't
want
to
have
too
much
overlap
in
terms
of
content,
so
we
can.
We
can
do
a
talk
together
and
let's
say
that
we
are
done
with
them
like
introduction
to
cd
events
yeah
or
we
could
adapt
that
we
could
use
some
of
that
to
to
build
the
keynote
as
well.
That's
an
option,
maybe
at
some.
F
B
I
think
it's
more
important
that
if,
if
you
feel
that
you
could
take
the
presentation
as
it
is
and
present
it
do
that,
rather
than
like
trying
to
make
up
something
new,
because
I
think
it's
more
important
to
actually
get
to
something
percent
than
actually
squeezing
yourself
to
produce
something
unique,
even
though
there
might
be
overlap
by
between
presentations.
F
C
Yeah
I
mean
for
the
keynote
my
idea
is:
we
should
have
something
not
too
long,
maybe
10,
15
minutes
and
something
that
like
makes
a
strong
point,
why
we
need
interoperability
in
ci
cd
and
why
events
so
maybe
talk
about
how
events
are
kind
of
ubiquitous
and
they're
used
everywhere
in
csd
already.
But
there
is
no
like
common
format
and
yeah
provide
some
some
examples.
Some
data
about
this
and
introduce
the
cd
events
project.
B
C
B
C
Okay
cool,
I
mean,
if
you
think
about
anything
else,
that
and
or
anyone
else
that
might
be
interested
in
presenting
or
any
content
that
you
think
would
be
good
to
have
here.
Please
let
me
know
I've
I've
put
in
mind
filling
a
good,
almost
part
of
the
schedule
between
keynotes
and
some
demos.
C
C
But
my
my
current
thinking
is
that
for
that
maybe
the
the
cd
con
event
like
it's
more
of
a
contributor
summit,
there
would
be
a
better
place
to
do
that
and
if
you
have
like,
if
we
have
a
few
people
signing
up
for
the
event,
I
think
it
would
be
difficult
to
hold
like
design
specification
session
with
a
large
group
of.
C
People,
so
I
think
if
we
have
like
a
room,
we
could
do
things
like
talks,
demos,
maybe
a
workshop.
If
anyone
is
available
to
to
build
one.
C
Oh,
we
could
try
one.
Another
idea
is
sorry
you're
going
to
say.
B
Well,
I
guess
that
also
depends
on
the
how
many
people
are
yeah
there,
or
did
you
think
of
doing
the
workshop
in
the
contributor
summits
virtually
or.
C
No,
I
was
just
thinking
the
type
of
content
I
would
fit
for
for
the
event.
So
I
think
if
we
have,
if
you
are
able
to
prepare
a
workshop,
that
might
be
a
good
way
to
to
use
some
of
the
time
of
the
of
the
event,
because
if
you
have
people
contributors
from
different
projects
in
the.
A
C
C
C
Yeah
we
might
skip
on
that,
but
yeah
we
could
have
worked.
I
mean
if
we
prepare
a
workshop
for
that
event
or
in
general
it's
something
that
we
can
then
reuse
for
different
events.
So
we
could.
C
C
Okay,
well
anything
else
on
this
cd
event,
con.
E
F
C
We
need
one
for
workshop,
but
I
think
we
mentioned
this
already
in
terms
of
proof
of
concepts
for
canadian
pocs.
Ishar
is
not
here.
I
know
I
was
chatting
with
him
this
morning,
he's
working
on
the
on
the
plc,
making
some
progress
on
it.
So,
but
I
don't
have
any
specific
updates
for
the
metrics
plc.
I
got
some
feedback
from
matthias,
so
thanks
for
reviewing
and
from
emil
as
well.
C
So
thanks
for
your
comments
on
that
yeah,
so
I
will
try
to
get
some
more
concrete
work
done
on
these
in
the
upcoming
days,
and
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
further
comments
or
if
you
think
you
have.
I
would
like
to
to
collaborate
to
contribute
to
this
just
reach
out
to
me.
C
F
For
the
python,
I
guess
no,
I'm
thinking
a
little
bit
so
matthias
has
been
discussing
having
schemas
for
our
messages
and
I'm
I'm
wondering
which
should
come
first
so
to
say,
because
obviously
it
would
be
easier
to
create
sdks
if
we
have
defined
schemas.
It's
not
a
requirement,
but
it's
sort
of
a
nice
to
have.
B
But
because
there
are
tools
to
generate
code
out
of
schemas,
so
it
I
don't
know
how
pretty
they
are
actually,
but
you
can.
You
can
use
schemas
to
generate
a
code,
so
you
can
actually
have
something
to
start
with.
C
Into
the
cloud
events
right,
so
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
to
have
at
least
some
scaffolding
for
the
for
how
the
sdk
will
look
like
I.
I.
C
Okay,
well,
I
wanted
to
understand
if
schemas
are
like
locker
for
any
work
to
be
done
on
the
sdks
or
if
it's,
if
you
have
any,
I
mean
what
what
kind
of
availability.
In
terms
of
time
you
have
to
work
on
the
sdks.
C
C
Okay,
yeah
I'll
continue
working,
I'm
working
on
the
spec.
I've
got
a
pr
that
I
started
down
below
I've,
not
edited
the
schemas
yet,
but
that's
part
of
the
work
that
I'm
doing
so
as
soon
as
this
that
is
done.
Hopefully,
we
can
start
getting
some
work
on
the
sdks
as
well
all
right.
B
Yeah
I
wanted
to
like
do
some
kind
of
of
background
introduction
for
people
that
were
kind
of
like
new
to
cloud
events
or
to
new
to
seed.
Events
was
like
what
this
is
actually
doing.
So
that's
trying
to
flesh
out
a
bit
on
that
subject,
and
I
didn't
know
really
where
to
put
it.
So
I
put
it
in
the
yeah
first.
B
I
wanted
to
put
it
in
a
speck,
but
maybe
it
was
better
in
the
read
me
so
I
put
it
in
read
me
and
then
try
to
to
figure
out
a
common
denominator
in
the
and
the
messages
we
sent
out
when
starting
both
sig
events
and
seed
events
and
try
to
comprise
that
and
add
in
some
of
my
own
ideas
into
it
so
feel
free
to
to
question
any
things.
If
you
think
it's
too
controversial
or
things
we
should
add,
and
so
on.
C
C
C
C
But
yeah
so
mainly,
I
think
if
you
look
at
cloud
events,
I
think
web
books
is
one
of
the
options
for
transporting
the
events,
so
I
wasn't
sure
I
wanted
you
to
make
like
a
strong
statement
against
my
web
books
on
the
the
main
read
me,
I
mean.
B
But
I
wasn't
100
sure
that
one
either
yeah.
So
that's
why
I
said
if
it's
too
controversial,
so
I'm
I'm
practicing.
If
you
feel
about
that
yeah,
we
should
not
put
that
in.
I
can
remove
that
part.
C
All
right:
well,
if
you
don't
have
a
strong
yeah
case
for
for
this,
maybe
we
could
remove
the.
Why
not
we're
books,
part
but
yeah.
Otherwise
it
looks
good.
Maybe
we
can
have.
I
think
there
are
a
few
comments
if
you
want
to
address
the
comments.
Yeah.
B
C
Okay,
six
minutes
left
so
the
next
one
is
service
published.
So
this
is
for
the
k
native,
but
yeah
ishen
is
not
here,
so
I
don't
think
there
is
much
we
can
discuss
on
this
yeah.
I
know
you
requested
some
more
information,
but
yes,
and
hopefully
we'll
come
back
on
this.
C
C
Okay,
so
for
the
core
documents,
apart
from
the
table
of
contents,
I
added
a
section
called
types
saying:
okay,
that
we
use
the
type
system
from
cloud
events,
but
we
have
some
more
more
types
of
our
own.
One
is
the
annum,
which
is
same
as
strings,
but
constrained
to
a
fixed
set
of
options
for
cases
where
we
have
fixed
values
that
we
want
to
to
specify
and
then
list
an
object.
I
think
we
already
had
a.
C
C
Tuples,
where
keys
are
strings
and
values
can
be
any
of
the
other
kind
and
the
list
we
don't
have
any
list
yet,
but
we
could
edit
or
it
could
remote,
remove
it
for
now
until
it's
used,
but
at
least
there's
a
value,
a
list
of
values
of
the
same
type,
and
I
think
this
will
be
useful.
When
we
introduce
links,
then
we
can
have
multiple
links,
so
you
can
have
a
list
of
things
of
the
same
type.
There.
A
Commenter,
should
we
have
any
restrictions
on
the
key
structure
I
mean,
should
it
be,
for
example,
the
camel
case
or
something
on
those
keys,
or
should
it
be
could
be
whatever
I
think,
or
would
it
make
sense
to
have
some.
C
D
C
Oh
yeah,
nice
thanks.
So
basically
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
in
the
top
of
the
document
like
the
core
md,
to
identify.
What
are
the
subjects
we
have
so.
A
C
A
D
C
Case
we
have
pipeline
run
and
task
run,
the
description
and
the
link
to
the
different
predicates
for
each
and
then
for
each
of
the
subject
have
a
table
which
specifies
what
are
the
different
attributes
with
a
description
and
examples,
and
so
in
case
of
the
pipeline
run.
So
we
have
the
id
and
with
some
more
content
so
like
what
is
an
id,
so
it
must
be.
For
instance,
you
need
to
identify
the
subject
within
the
source
and
some
example
to
give
an
idea
of
how
to
fill
this
in
same
for
task.
C
One
is
not
done
yet
and
then
for
the
events
going
into
the
events.
This
is
still
working
progress
but
like
for
python,
run
queued
some
description
about
the
event.
What
is
the
event
type,
the
predicate
the
subject
and
then
for
each
of
the
field
that
was
defined
here
say,
which
one
is
mandatory,
which
one
is
permitted.
So
let's
say
we
are
sending
python
right
cute
event.
We
still
want
to
have
the
id
the
pipeline
name,
but
we
might
not
have.
C
We
will
not
have
like
errors
or
details
about
the
failure
of
the
pipeline
because
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
them
there
and
I'm
doing
this
for
all
the
events
and
the
idea
is
that
then,
based
on
these
tables,
then
we
can
generate
a
schema
so
transform
this
in.
In
the
cloud
event,
binding
document
basically
write
this
information
in
a
json
schema
format
or
something
similar.
B
Good
yeah,
so
when
you're
talking
the
stream
and
documentation
just
a
reflection
here
so
in
in
eiffel,
we
have
had
both
json
schemas
and
the
documentation
in
two
different
places,
and
but
we
found
it's
sometimes
a
bit
difficult
to
to
make
sure
that
you
correlate
both
of
them
documentation
on
the
schema.
B
And
so
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
basically
we're
trying
to
centralize
documentation
schema.
So
we
have
defined
a
custom
format
where
we
are
intending
to
generate
out
schemas
and
documentation
from
a
custom
or
a
central
format.
B
So
I
just
wanted
to
raise
that
yeah
just
that
idea
or
what
we're
doing
there
right
now.
So
people
are
at
least
aware
of
it.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
go
that
path,
but
just
raise
awareness
of
it.
C
It's
a
very
good
point.
I
had
some
thoughts
about
it
as
well,
but
yeah
right
now.
C
I
would
like
to
to
try
and
get
this
finished,
and
I
think
that
would
be
hopefully
sufficient
to
to
to
create
a
0.1
version
that
we
could
have
in
time
for
the
conference.
C
But
I
totally
agree
that,
in
terms
of
maintaining
this
over
time,
we
might
want
to
have
some
like
machine,
readable
format
or
so
that
we
used
to
generate
this.
A
B
C
A
C
C
Idea
all
right,
we
are
at
time,
but
thanks
a
lot
and
good
to
see
you.
E
E
E
E
E
A
E
Are
and
brad
mccoy
who
runs
our
ortilius
open
source
project
from
australia
is
who
I
is
now.
I
recall
who
who
asked
me
if
I
had
ever
heard
of
them.