►
From YouTube: CDEvents Working Group - Dec 13, 2022
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
C
C
C
B
B
B
And
the
other
thing
we
discussed
last
time
was
the
top
three
priorities.
So
this
was
after
the
presentation
of
the
DLC.
Previously,
requests
have
to
have
like
a
list
of
top
three
priorities
for
when
asking
for
new
contributors
to
join
the
project,
and
so
we
discussed
three
things:
python
SDK,
Java,
SDK,.
B
And
kind
of
surface
existing
POC
migrate
them
to
cdmi
0.1,
so
I
created
this
top
free
label
with
the
stock
free,
unwanted
view
in
the
existing
CD
events,
releases,
project
and
I've
put
in
here
the
free
items
we
discussed
so
for
the
PLC.
There
was
no
issue
so
I
created
a
new
issue
specifically
points
to
the
existing
pocs
and
seek
events
so
and
yeah
so
make
sure
it's
okay,
they're
hosted
in
sick
events.
They
use
an
old
version
of
the
SDK.
B
B
B
A
D
B
B
B
B
B
C
B
C
A
B
C
C
B
B
B
D
B
B
D
Could
we
maybe
revisit
also
the
scope
of
the
zero
two
release?
What
we
want
to
be
want
to
get
in
there,
this
the
people
on
this
call,
if
there
are
any
any
preferences
on
what
to
prioritize.
Of
course,
connecting
events
is
something
we
have
discussed
that
might
end
up
there,
unless
it
will
take
too
long
to
discuss
it,
but.
D
B
D
D
B
D
Today,
but
there
should
be
a
milestone
as
well
yeah
and
then
you
could
get
yeah
there.
You
get
zero
two,
so
we
can
see
if
anything
from
the
rest
of
the
roadmap
should
also
be
in
zero
two
or
if
we
should
move
things
away
from
conservative,
because
we
don't
think
it
will
be
possible
to
have
it
there
and
I'm
not
sure
which
way
to
do
this,
if
we
should
do
it
from
the
roadmap
or
from
the
other
and
and
also
in
the
roadwork.
D
D
B
D
C
B
D
C
D
C
D
D
C
D
B
D
C
B
A
D
B
D
B
B
D
D
D
Or
do
you
see
them
that
we
should
use
that
of
GitHub
as
a
template
repo
in
some
way,
because
I
don't
think
it's
done
that
way
by
default?
And
if
you
would,
then
they
would.
Of
course
those
Superstars
will
get
the
same
files
as
dot
GitHub
has
and
we
don't
I,
don't
want
the
profile,
for
example,
to
be
analogs
today
in
all
repositories
that
were
created
on
the
door.
D
C
D
D
D
Exactly
so,
that's
not
what
we
are
to
hear.
That's
yeah,
so
I
think
a
synchronization
thing
or
a
Global
configuration
external
thing.
I
think
that
there
are
at
least
two
different
GitHub
projects
which
can
handle
this
kind
of
configuration
as
code
on
top
of
all
your
repositories
in
organization.
Somehow.
D
I,
don't
know,
maybe
not
in
your
roadmap,
yet
okay,
it
I
think
it
requires
someone
to
be
interested
in
working
right
and
if
there
is
no
one
yet
well,
I
wouldn't
like
to
remove
it
to
close
it.
So
that's
the
option
then
I
think
we
should
have
to
enrollment,
but
I
wouldn't
say
that
it
would
happen
anytime,
coming
in
six
month,
sales.
B
D
C
B
D
D
D
B
B
C
B
B
D
D
A
D
D
B
D
C
B
D
D
A
I
think
so
too,
I
think
and
also,
as
we
mentioned
before,
like
the
I'm.
Definitely
the
kind
of
person
who
works
best
with
some
sort
of
deadline.
I,
don't
work
really
well,
either
but
or
anyway,
but
the
best
with
the
deadline
so
having
semi-frequent
deadlines
and
I
think
every
quarter
is
a
reasonable.
We
don't
need
to
set
a
fixed
Cadence,
but
we
have
like
a
rough
roughly
every
quarter,
something
but.
D
B
B
B
D
D
C
B
B
D
D
C
B
A
A
D
I
have
a
question
that
related
to
this
top
three
assignment
so
top
three
that
we
said
there.
If
someone
looks
at
our
top
three
list
and
sees
that,
oh,
that
ticket
is
already
taken
by
Eric.
Will
that
mean
that
they
don't
want
to
to
contribute
I,
think
or
what?
How
will
people
see?
That's
the
link
or
will.
A
C
B
B
I
I
mean
we
can't
clarify
I
guess
this
is
just
an
initial
attempt.
The
idea
is
when
we
maybe
did
you
see-
to
provide
a
kind
of
template
or
format
for
for
projects
to
provide
this
information.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
like
contact
person
associated
to
the
issue,
so
at
least
some
of
the
wants
to
contribute.
They
know
who
to
talk
to
and
ASMR
they
can
reach
out
reach
out
to
and
say.
Okay
I
would
like
to
contribute
to
these
I
mean,
of
course
they
can
contribute
to
that.
B
D
D
But
couldn't
we
have
to
do
it?
The
simple
way
to
say:
I
mean
in
text,
along
with
the
table
or
whatever,
where
these
top
three
tickets
are
shown
on
some
CDF
site
that
could
it
could
be
said
that
if
you
want
to
contribute
and
the
ticket
is
already
assigned
to
someone,
please
reach
out
to
that
person
to
see
how
you
can
help
out.
B
D
C
D
C
C
B
B
B
D
D
B
D
D
B
B
B
D
Yeah
I
believe
real
estate
is
something
in
a
documentation
saying
that
we
aim
to
be
aligned,
but
we
might
not
be
yet
something
like
that.
We
have
stated
in
the
documentation
or-
and
that's
still
true,
but
it's
not
enforced,
neither
from
us
nor
from
seek
interoperability,
but
it
needs
to
be
fully
aligned.
Yet.
D
B
C
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
B
That
looks
when
the
pipe
the
build
is
done
and
it
goes
and
signs
the
artifacts,
and
then
it
adds
some
annotations
to
the
the
build
information
to
say:
okay
yeah
this
is
signed
now,
and
so
what
I
want
to
do
there
is
to
send
an
event
so
that
someone
could
capture
that
event
and
react
to
that,
as
opposed
as
reacting
to
the
artifact
was
built
because
yeah
you,
if
you
want
to
assign
an
artifact,
you
want
to
react
to
those.
So
that's
something
that
I
was.
C
D
Yeah,
it's
probably
higher
not
highest
priority
for
zero
two,
but
we
could
try
to
have
something.
Maybe
it's
zero,
two
I
guess
this
would
be
like,
as
I
said
before,
like
an
epic
level
thing
which
could
contain
sub
it's
sub
issues
and
some
sub
issues
might
be
sold
in
this
area,
but
for
sure
not
the
whole
thing.
B
D
B
C
B
You
find
different
type
of
tests
tests
in
City
events,
so
this
is
also
partially
related
to
software
supply
chain
aspects.
We
have
anything
events
like
security,
scans
and
so
forth,
but
there
are
also
other
type
of
events
like
unit
tests,
end-to-end
tests
and
classic
test
and
so
forth,
and
maybe
there's
some
chat
with
a
cube
test.
Folks,
if
you're
interested
in
what
City
events
could
do
for
them,
but
there's
been
no
no
follow-up.
After
the
initial
discussion.
B
C
B
D
It's
fine
for
me
and
I
think
once
we
have
a
fixed
list
of
things,
we
want
to
work
on
towards
serial
two.
It's
also
easier
to
to
sell
that
so
to
the
community
or
to
to
publish
that
so
that
other
other
people
can
see
where
they
can
contribute
if
they
want
to
help
out
in
zero.
Two,
so
I
think
it's
valuable
that
we
do
this
now
or
not.
Today,
then,
of
course,
obviously,
but
maybe
continuing
on
the
Sig
meeting
on
Monday.