►
From YouTube: CDF SIG Events - Jan 30, 2023
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
A
B
C
I,
don't
have
too
much
that
I
prepared
on
a
small
agenda,
but
it's
not
the
dance.
You
can
go
through
it,
but
maybe
we
should
perceive
someone
else.
Okay
to
join
this
one.
C
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
wait
any
longer.
Let's
see
this
might
be
a
quick
meeting
depending
on
the
discussions
of
course.
So
please
add
yourselves
to
the
participants
list.
C
And
action
items
from
last
meeting
I
didn't
notice
any
I,
don't
think
that
we
had
really
any
formal
items.
We
talked
a
bit
about
presentations
that
we
want
to
get
to.
The
group
I
did
reach
out
to
Ole
from
Cube
shop
regarding
a
presentational
test
Cube
and
he
then
proposed
that
I
should
contact
Bruno,
which
is
probably
the
one
who
would
give
the
presentation
and
I
reached
out
to
him
but
too
late.
C
That
was
today
actually
so
he
is
planning
now
to
come
to
our
next
Sig
meeting
in
two
weeks
and
present
the
test
Cube
to
us,
but
no
real
actions
from
last
time.
C
So
I'm
not
sure
Andrea,
you're,
of
course
aware.
But
what
do
you
see?
We
can
just
mention.
I
noted
one
thing
that
I
think
could
be
interesting.
Maybe
for
this
group
that
there
is
a
an
intention
to
write
a
project
benefits
document.
There
is
a
membership
benefits
document
today
which
describes
what
benefits
you
would
have
as
a
member
in
CDF,
but
there
is
no
corresponding
document
for
what
what
the
projects
in
CDF
would
get.
C
A
B
Yeah
I
mean
we
started
working
on
it
with
Melissa
we
expecting
to
put
together
some
draft
and
I
guess
we'll
represent
progress
to
at
least
where
we
got
to,
and
tomorrow
there
is
a
the
next
TLC
meeting
yeah
yeah.
So
it
won't
be
ready
by
tomorrow,
but
we
can
at
least
present
progress,
and
here
we
will
for
sure
I
mean
we.
B
We
can
consider
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
share
it
once
it's
in
once
it's
in
a
more
stable
format,
maybe
to
to
share
it
with
all
the
project
and.
A
B
Know
get
input
of
things
that
seems
to
be
missing
and
also.
A
B
B
Yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
see
any
reason
not
to
either
I
think
the
draft
the
link
to
the
draft
is
there
already.
Oh.
B
If
you
want
to
look
different
and
start
looking
through,
I
mean
the
notes
might
not
necessarily
be
in
a
format
digestible
way
or
self-explaining,
let's
say
because
we
had
some
chat
with
Melissa.
We
got
the
kind
notes,
but.
A
B
C
A
C
Do
you
see
any
other
major
updates
from
the
TOC
Andrea
that
we
should
race
here?
I
haven't
mentioned
the
separate
topic
about
Google
seminal
code
later,
on
which
we
all
know.
We
also
discussed
two
weeks
ago
on
TLC.
B
The
only
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
mention
is
that,
similar
to
what
the
Outreach
committee
has
done,
we
want
to
have
project
representative
joining
the
the
TOC
meetings.
So
it
is
one
person
per
project
to
attend
the
TOC
meeting
on
a
regular
basis,
so
that
we
make
sure
we
keep
the
flow
of
information,
yeah
continuing,
but
I
guess
with
both
of
us
joining
the
TSC
meetings
on
a
regular
basis.
That
requirement
is.
A
B
For
or
City
events.
A
B
C
Thanks
so
I'm
already
on
the
TLC,
so
definitely
that
was
a
good
fit,
but
I
also
did
that
part
and,
as
you
say,
Andrea
you're
you're
there,
as
well
as
a
chair,
so
I
think
we're
quite
good
representation
from
this
project
in
TLC
anyway.
So
we
don't
need
to
have
any
more
mandatory
participation.
I
think.
Do
you
see
when
it
comes
from
from
us.
A
C
Yeah
then,
just
some
comments
from
the
city
events
work
group,
where
we
have
parallel
meetings
to
this
hi
Laura
welcome.
C
So
in
the
last
meetings
we
have
heard,
we
have
mostly
talked
about
incident
events
and
testing
events,
so
testing
events
come
from
or
is
it
a
proposal
from
the
test?
Cube
people
Cube
shop,
where
we
have
had
representation
on
those
meetings
discussing
a
new
bucket
of
events,
which
is
then
called
testing
events?
Currently
so
the
pull
request?
Is
there
you're
free,
of
course,
to
come
there
and
share
your
thoughts
and
contribute
your
input
to
those
events?
C
We
don't
have
any
any
release
date
or
so
planned
for
this
this
bucket,
but
we'll
see
if
it
would
make
the
next
release
of
the
events
or
not
increments,
to
PC
Patrick.
On
the
incident
events,
that's
one
of
the
major
things
we
would
like
to
have
in
the
02
version
of
Siri
events,
and
there
is
work
on
going
on
that.
One
and
you'll,
of
course,
also
welcome
to
go
there
and
look
at
that.
C
C
When
it
comes
to
other
sigs,
the
Sig
interoperability,
the
very
couple
of
interesting
meetings.
Last
week
there
one
was
the
actual
recording
of
the
the
latest
text
on
TV
episode
on
the
CD
pipeline.
C
C
So
there's
a
link
here
to
that
episode.
If
you're
interested,
then
there
was
as
well
a
meeting
about
value
stream
mapping
with
people
from
the
Valley
Stream,
nothing
Consortium,
so
value
stream.
Nothing
is
something
that
we
have
really
discussed
much
in
relation
to
CD,
Foundation
or
CD
Pipelines,
but
it
turns
out
that
they,
the
previousm
Consortium,
has
a
an
interoperability.
C
Tc
I
think
they
call
themselves
that
is
discussing
interoperability
in
tools
related
to
Value
stream
mapping
and
the
scope
of
LSG
mapping
seems
to
to
overlap
quite
a
lot
with
the
CD
pipeline
or
the
seed
continuous
delivery
scope,
except
that
it
actually
starts
a
lot
earlier
in
the
process.
I
would
say
than
the
CD
pipeline
does.
C
So
there
was
quite
a
short
meeting
last
week,
but
anyway
the
the
group.
There
are
interested
in
continuing
the
the
collaboration
with
us
so
as
I
understood
it
from
that
meeting,
they
will
set
up
continuing
meeting
meetings,
meeting
series
with
what
we
would
be
invited
to
discuss
interoperability
and
for
us.
Then,
of
course
you
could
focus
on
events
for
this
to
solve
this
interoperability.
C
B
No,
not
not
yet
I
haven't
heard
from
her
yet
like,
as
you
said,
I
think
the
that's
the
next
type
of
day
for
them
to
discuss
within
the
group
and
yeah
and
set
up
some
kind
of
recurring
meeting
their.
E
C
C
Okay,
that's
about
other
groups.
I
didn't
mention
anything
about
supply,
chain
security
or
best
practices.
Is
there
anything
I,
don't
know
Leo
right,
I
think
there
was
no
supply
chain
security
meeting
last
week
was
there
at
least
not
in
the
Stig,
but
maybe
there
was
a
the
meeting
for
the
maturity
model.
C
E
One
comment
here:
I:
don't
think
that
the
supply
chain
seek
was
initially
intended
to
handle
security,
stuff
I,
think
it
evolved
to
that
yeah.
So
this
is
something
that
I
will
need
to
discuss
with
the
with
the
colleagues
to
understand
where
it.
Where
this
you
know,
this
sig
is
going
to
so
right
now,
I'm,
just
only
lurking
on
your
meetings
to
hear
what
you're
doing,
but
not
representing
the
what
the
Sikh
is
doing.
Yeah.
C
C
C
That
was
also
discussed
on
the
TOC
meeting
two
weeks
ago
and
it
was
discussed
how
that
is
handed
I
mean
we,
as
City
events,
haven't
been
part
of
any
such
activity
explicitly
before
there
was
a
Jenkins
project
with
Cloud
events
or
a
theater
version
of
CD
events,
very
early
version
of
Dylan's
protocol
two
years
ago,
or
one
and
a
half
years
ago
now
and
I
actually
asked
before
this
meeting
reached
out
to
Mark
Waite
to
see
if
they
have
already
started
to
propose
anything
for
this.
C
C
But
the
thing
that
we
need
to
do,
then,
is
that
we
need
to
provide
a
mentor
for
such
a
project
or
we
need
to
appoint
someone
that
could
Mentor.
It's
today,
let's
put
it
into
this
project
ideas
list
I
reached
out
to
vibhav
as
well,
who
was
I,
think
mentoring,
artistic
co-mentoring,
the
previous
projector,
with
the
cloud
events
or
City
events
haven't
got
any
replies
from
him.
Yet,
if
he's
interested
to
be
there
I
think
Sala
boy
was
there
as
well.
C
Mauricio
I'm,
not
sure
how
active
he
is
in
this
area
and
if
he
might
be
interestingly
Mentor
it,
but
that's
just
for
the
Jenkins
part,
I.
Think,
of
course,
any
any
project
could
could
even
a
City
events,
integration
which
we
might
be
interested
into
in
following
and
helping
out.
So
of
course,
as
well
so
I
don't
know,
for
example,
with
the
now
we
have
representative
from
tecton
here.
Is
there
anything
ongoing
there
in
discussions
within
techton
on
setting
up
a
Google
summer
code
project?
B
So
basically,
the
Jenkins
folks
kind
of
introduced
the
work
they
do
for
gsoc
and
it's
for
them.
It's
a
six-month
preparation
work
well
before
the
actually
get
to
the
well
I
think
it
was
something
days
ago,
some
a
week
ago,
they
proposal
for
the
organization.
So
basically
you
propose
as
a
localization
to
G-Shock
and
to
be
accepted.
B
You
need
to
be
well
prepared
at
least
understood,
so
you
need
to
have
a
good
number
of
project
mentors
and
yeah
so
that
it's
basically
you,
you
present
your
organization
as
I
get
a
host
for
for
this
project.
B
So
for
tecton,
that's
definitely
too
late
to
start
our
own
project.
So
when
we
discuss
this
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
there
were
only
a
few
days
left
before
the
organization.
B
B
What
we
discussed
with
with
the
Jenkins
folks
and
what
I
would
like,
also
for
the
TOC
there
to
help
in
future,
making
sure
that
we
have
some
guidelines
and
helpful
a
project
to
be
notified
in
time
when,
if
they
want
to
participate
such
initiatives
so
that
they
start
preparing
on
time-
and
you
know
finding
the
people
and
resources,
but
there
still
might
be
a
possibility
for,
for
the
first
thing
you
mentioned
I,
think
to
to
propose
a
project.
C
Oh
yeah,
oh
yeah,
so
so
I
discussed
that
with
Mark
as
well-
and
there
is
I
mean
the
deadline
for
that
is
not
not
February
7th
but
but
later.
Okay.
B
C
If
so,
but
then
I
believe
it's
around
April
4th
or
something
where
the
deadline
is
for
the
the
contributors
to
Json
is
and
by
then
there
needs
to
have
been
I
mean.
The
project
needs
to
be
obviously
in
place
so
that
the
contributors
can
be
assigned
to
them.
So
I
think
still.
There
is
some
time
to
to
get
in
projects
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
actually
April
4th
or
probably
sometime
earlier,
but
but
at
least
not
after
it
before
but
I'm,
pretty
sure.
C
A
B
B
I
I
know
that
Fidelity
they're
still
definitely
interested
in
having
the
Jenkins
plus
City
events,
functionality
and
last
I
heard
there
was
planning
on
doing
the
implementation,
but
that's
something
that
we
could
also
discuss
with
them,
depending
on
what
the
timeline
that
they
have
in
mind
and
the
resource
of
availability
that
might
be
interested
in
mentoring,
a
gsup
project
about
that
as
well,
so
yeah.
C
I
assume
that
it
means
that
you
need
to
be
available
during
the
summer,
at
least,
and
probably
as
I
said
as
well
before
some
some
decent
preparation
before
the
work
is
started,
so
that
it's
the
task
is
clear
and,
and
so
but
yeah
it
will
be
great
if
it's
some
project
that
would
work
on
home,
City
events
to
some
extent,
I
think
that
also
it
was
mentioned,
he
looked
into
Jenkins
text
and
their
similar
corresponding
project
page
for
2022
I,
think
it
was
embarrassed.
C
C
Okay,
that's
about
it
for
the
gsoc,
unless
you
have
any
other
comments
there
so
presentations.
There
are
no
presentations
planned
today,
but,
as
I
said
in
the
beginning,
next
week
or
sorry
in
two
weeks,
we
should
hopefully
have
a
presentation
on
test
Cube
what
this
cube
is
and
how
it
relates
to
how
it
could
relate
to
CD
events.
People
from
test
Cube
are
quite
active
right
now,
at
least
in
posting
the
testing
events
here.
C
Looking
forward
to
that,
then
just
wanted
to
mention
the
conferences
that
are
upcoming
and
have
cfp
closing
soon,
our
own
silicon
cfp
clock
is
there
on
February
10th
in
a
bit
more
than
a
week,
it's
in
Vancouver
Canada
and
then
related
to
that
the
same
week
in
Vancouver
as
well.
It's
the
open
source
Summit,
not
America,
and
the
cfp,
for
that
controls
is
already
on
February
5th
in
less
than
a
week
now.
So,
if
you
plan
to
go
to
Silicon
right
away,
I
would
suggest
that
you
also
propose
something
to
open
source
Summit.
C
I
think
that
the
cubecon,
which
is
in
Amsterdam,
has
not
yet
had
its
schedule,
announced
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
there
is
any
interesting
topics
from
our
perspective
there.
Let's
see
when
that
comes
out.
A
A
C
So
that
was
the
end
of
my
small
prepared
agenda.
There.
Is
there
anything
yeah
now,
since
jalander
is
here
sorry
about
the
Spinnaker
proposal,
there
are
there
any
updates
on
that.
One.
D
D
Yeah
we'll
be
meeting
there,
I
think
yeah
we'll
discuss
what
we
need
more
clarifications
or
what
actually
the
things
need
to
be
discussed.
C
D
And
the
updates
to
the
Java
SDK
to
have
the
latest
specification,
so
that
is
also
like
most
of
the
things
are
in
place.
I
think
if
someone
reviews
that
all
right,
if
you
can
go
ahead,
I
think
so
there
are
I
think
quite
a
lot
of
changes.
I
think,
based
on
the
latest
specification
that
has
changed
from
previous
one
yeah
I
have
given
some
a
couple
of
comments
there
and
I
think
Adam
at
rest,
most
of
them.
D
C
Is
there
a
yeah,
it's
the
player
up
there
I,
don't
know
what
I
looked
at
it
I,
don't
know
I'm,
not
sure
yeah.
C
B
So
on
that
one
jalander
I
won't
try
to
to
comment
on
the
on
the
Java,
because
last
time
I
did
Java
development
was
maybe
15
years
ago,
as
I'm
a
bit
out
of
date.
B
B
D
Yeah,
so
not
done
any
validations
as
of
now
I
think
yeah.
So
if
if
specification
is
I,
think
it's
it's
come
to
one
place,
so
we
can
definitely
we
can
add
some
schema.
Validation,
I
think
I
think
we
need
to
take
that,
so
we
have
not
considered
it
at
any
stage
of
this
creation
of
SDK.
B
Yes,
yes,
so
we
we
have
some
some
tests
that
goes
against
the
the
schema
in
the
yeah
in
the
spec
repo
me
see.
If
I
can
hold
it.
A
C
C
To
that
point,
I,
don't
think
that
we
ever
wrote
any
like
requirements
on
what
the
sdks
need
to
fulfill,
to
be
able
to
be
up
to
date
with
a
certain
version
of
the
protocol.
But
obviously
it's
it's
valuable
to
validate
towards
the
recent
the
latest,
whether
the
current
scheme
or
the
citizens
that
we
were
intending
to
support.
C
So
it
just
to
prove
that
the
demonstrated
are
actually
in
line
with
the
schema.
But
as
I
said
that
there's
I
don't
think
we
wrote
any
such
rules
anywhere.
Maybe
we
we
should
do
what
it
means
to
be
compliant
with
a
version
of
civil
events,
but
yeah
I.
B
Yeah
I,
absolutely
I,
agree
I,
don't
think
it's
a
requirement
for
for
the
pr
to
go
out
at
all.
It
was
just.
You
know
wondering
that
it's
something
that
is
considered
yeah
I,
think
it
it's
there.
I
think
indeed,
I
remember
doing
something
about
that,
but
I'll.
B
No,
we
didn't,
we
didn't
create
requirements
for
those.
C
B
No,
unfortunately,
I
haven't
heard
from
Eric
I
think
he
could
not
join
the
last
couple
of
meetings.
So.
C
C
Think,
of
course,
that
depends
on
if
we
have
something
valuable
to
to
include
in
it
and
currently
I,
don't
think
we
have
Morris
anything
too
valuable,
so
we
can
release
it
today,
but
I
think
the
incident
events
are
the
ones
that
are
closest
to
the
there
I'm,
not
sure
Andrea
what
you
think
if
it
would
be
feasible,
we
think
to
to
have
those
done
within
two
weeks
and
also
prepare
for
the
release
itself
or
I.
Guess,
there's
quite
high
risk
that
we
will
delay
during
race
sometime.
B
Yeah,
yes,
I
guess
it
depends,
I
mean
we.
We
do
have
a
kind
of
weekly
meeting
for
City
events,
which
allows
them
a
bit
faster
progress,
but
yeah.
B
C
A
A
C
D
One
thing
is
I
one
thing
I
wanted
to
check.
Actually,
so
we
have
this.
We
in
the
use
case
also,
we
mentioned
like
CD
events,
observability
right,
so
where
we
show
the
end-to-end
workflow
of
code
commit
to
deployment
in
these
stages
like
what
is
the
visualization
kind
of
thing.
D
So
any
thoughts
on
that
like
how
to
start
on
that
or
anyone
like
started
with
that
any
of
the
kind
of
prototype
kind
of
thing
or
any
any
suggestions
or
any
thoughts
how
to
start
with
that
like
if
you
want
them
to
come
up
with
any
POC.
B
B
Yeah,
so
for
the
in
that
area
we
started
the
durometric
plc
and
we
will
continue
on
that
now
when
we
introduce
the
incident
events
yeah,
that's
I,
think
the
the
other
thing
that
that
we
have
at
the
moment,
but
we
don't
have
so
that
that
POC
is
basically
about
you
know
having
the
the
events
sent
by
different
platforms
through
adapters
and
collecting
them
and
say:
okay.
Well
with
this
data,
we
could
create
the
dura
metrics,
but
we
don't
have
a
proper
visualization
as
such,
yet
in
place.
B
So
if
you
have
any
idea,
if
you
have
ideas
about
something
we
could
start
or
reuse
in
that
area,
that's
for
sure
it
would
be
welcome.
I,
guess
what
one
of
the
ideas
for
this
romantic
specifically
was
to
try
and
integrate
with
the
the
Four
Keys
approach
it
and
Google.
B
So
we
treat
we
try
to
reach
out
to
both
myself
and
celebrate
to
Dave
on
Google's
site,
but
he
did
not
reply
anymore
to
either
of
us,
so
I'm
not
sure
I
will
be
able
to
to
continue
on
that
unless
we
get
some
reply
from
from
them.
Also
that
relies
on
the
python
SDK
being
available,
because
that
that
project
is
written
in
Python,
but
there
might
be
there
might
be
other
options.
We
can.
C
Almost
to
that
I
remember,
having
heard
some
discussions
was
it
from
the
CD.
It
wasn't
called
CD
Summit
in
in
Austin
I
said
Microsoft
to
raise
that
or
who
did
race
the
thought
on
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
was
visualization
or
metrics
or
something
related
am
I.
Miss.
B
Yeah
on
the
during
the
the
to
the
event
Summit
there
in
I
think
Dave
from
Google
I
found
the
four
key
project
was
there,
so
we
discussed
about
working
together
on
on
devops
metrics,
but
yeah.
Okay,.
C
B
C
Okay,
that's
a
good
question
get
under
and
it
would
be
great
to
I
mean
it's
obviously
easier
to
show
something
that
is
special
and
currently
the
students.
Spec
is
more
assisted,
dry
spec,
with
of
course,
sdks
attached
to
it,
but
it
it
would
be
great
to
be
able
to
show
when
we
have
demos
and
such
on
this
protocol
and
talk
about
it
to
show
some
some
kind
of
visualization
based
on
these
events.